Yapese Empire

File:Yap.png, including the islands and atolls that made up the former Yapese Empire.]]

The Empire covered over 1,300 kilometres of the north-western Pacific and included a vast number of island groups and low-lying coral atolls. The territory consists of both ruling and constituent islands, and they are indicated below.{{Cite journal |last=Petersen |first=Glenn |date=2000 |title=Indigenous Island Empires: Yap and Tonga Considered |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/25169463#metadata_info_tab_contents |journal=The Journal of Pacific History |volume=35 |issue=1 |pages=5–27 |issn=0022-3344|jstor=25169463}} The Yapese Empire consists of islands stretching from Yap main island in modern-day Yap State to some atolls in the western part of Chuuk State.

{{See also|Woleai script}}

File:Woleai script.gif.]]A variety of languages were spoken in the Empire. Yapese was spoken on the main islands while Ulithian, Woleaian, Satawalese, Nguluwan and Puluwat languages were spoken on the constituent islands and atoll groups.

The Woleaian script, also sometimes known as the Caroline Islands script, was the only indigenous writing system developed in the region. It was a syllabary used in Woleai until the mid-20th century. Some of the characters were based on Latin letters whereas the origins of other characters are not known. It was used by an estimated 1,600 people.{{Cite web |title=Caroline Island Script (Woleai) |url=https://omniglot.com/writing/woleai.htm |access-date=2024-11-28 |website=omniglot.com}}

Before the arrival of Western colonial powers in the Micronesian region, Yap and all of its constituent islands and atolls practised traditional animistic religions with different sets of mythologies, customs, practices, and rituals. Yapese mythology bears some resemblance to Chuukic mythology although the direction of diffusion is unknown.{{cite book | last=Dobbin | first=Jay D. | title=Summoning the powers beyond : traditional religions in Micronesia | publisher=University of Hawaiʻi Press | publication-place=Honolulu | date=2011 | isbn=978-0-8248-6011-0 | oclc=794925375}}

File:Satawal boat - Sesario Sawralur arrives in Saipan.png, similar to the ones used centuries ago to deliver tributes to Gagil.]]

The Empire had a form of tribute system known as sawey. According to the sawey system, the Empire demanded regular tributes known as pitigil tamol to be presented to the chief of Wanyan Village and the chief of Gatchaper, who is also the paramount chief of Gagil.{{Cite web |title=Political Relationship Between Yap and the Outer Islands |url=https://press-files.anu.edu.au/downloads/press/p63701/html/ch04s05.html |access-date=2024-11-28 |website=press-files.anu.edu.au}} The tributes would travel from the east to the west from as far Namonuito to Ulithi and finally to Yap. The tributes took the form of various items such as lavalava (bagiiy), mats, shells, coconut rope, and coconut oil. In return, the chiefs and people of Gagil such as Sunsigma von Yaplett would reciprocate by providing gifts such as yams, bananas, sweet potatoes, bamboo, red soil pigment, pots, and other manufactured items not found in the low-lying islands and atolls. These offerings to the chiefs of Gatchaper and Gagil were believed to have originated from Yangolap, the mythical Yapese founder of the sawey.{{Cite web|title=Political Relationship Between Yap and the Outer Islands|url=https://press-files.anu.edu.au/downloads/press/p63701/html/ch04s05.html|access-date=2022-02-13|website=press-files.anu.edu.au}}{{Cite book|last=Sudo |first=Ken-ichi |title=Rank, Hierarchy and Routes of Migration: Chieftainship in the Central Caroline Islands of Micronesia |chapter=Rank, Hierarchy and Routes of Migration |date=2006 |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt2jbjs3.7 |work=Origins, Ancestry and Alliance |pages=57–72 |editor-last=Fox |editor-first=James J. |series=Explorations in Austronesian Ethnography |publisher=ANU Press |jstor=j.ctt2jbjs3.7 |isbn=978-0-7315-2432-7 |access-date=2022-03-09 |editor2-last=Sather |editor2-first=Clifford}}

File:Yapese Social Caste System.jpg

The Yapese sociopolitical structure was based on a land tenure system which delegated the social rank of individual land parcels, determining its placement in a hierarchical structure.{{Cite journal |last=Marksbury |first=Richard A. |date=1982 |title=Legislating Social Order: An Example from the Yap Islands |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/40332266#metadata_info_tab_contents |journal=Oceania |volume=53 |issue=1 |pages=19–28 |issn=0029-8077}} Social classes were divided into two groups based on their two factors: land parcel rankings and control of resources.{{Cite journal |last=Marksbury |first=Richard A. |date=1982 |title=Legislating Social Order: An Example from the Yap Islands |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/40332266#metadata_info_tab_contents |journal=Oceania |volume=53 |issue=1 |pages=19–28 |issn=0029-8077|jstor=40332266}}

Each village has its own class ranking within its municipal chiefdom based on its number of military victories, and each village also has its own internal set of social classes exclusive to that group for its people. All low classes and low-class villages were under the authority of villages that were ranked higher since the latter had considerable power and voice (lungun).{{Cite journal|last=Marksbury|first=Richard A.|date=1982|title=Legislating Social Order: An Example from the Yap Islands|url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/40332266|journal=Oceania|volume=53|issue=1|pages=19–28|doi=10.1002/j.1834-4461.1982.tb01524.x |jstor=40332266 |issn=0029-8077|url-access=subscription}} Villages and municipal chiefdoms were continuously at war amongst one another, and as a result, village and personal social ranks fluctuated based on military outcomes.

The Yapese Empire was a supra-island political system linked by trade and ceremonial relationships. The ideology of the sawey maintained that the villages of Wanyan and Gatchaper held suzerainty over the islands and atolls to the east, stretching from Ngulu to Ulithi and from Fais to Namonuito.Fox, J & Sather, C (ed.) (1996). Origins, ancestry and alliance: Explorations in Austronesian ethnography. "Ch.4: Rank, hierarchy and routes of migration: Chieftainship in the central Caroline Islands of Micronesia", para. 1. Australia: Australian National University Press. Retrieved from https://press-files.anu.edu.au/downloads/press/p63701/html/ch04s05.html The system stipulated that the relationship was akin to that of the analogous "parent and child" relationship with Yap holding dominion and the responsibility to give assistance to the outer islanders should the need arise.{{Cite web|title=Political Relationship Between Yap and the Outer Islands|url=https://press-files.anu.edu.au/downloads/press/p63701/html/ch04s05.html|access-date=2022-02-14|website=press-files.anu.edu.au}}{{Cite journal |last=Lessa |first=William A. |date=1950 |title=The Place of Ulithi in the Yap Empire |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/44124303 |journal=Human Organization |volume=9 |issue=1 |pages=16–18 |doi=10.17730/humo.9.1.y271x91u0850g612 |jstor=44124303 |issn=0018-7259|url-access=subscription }}

Although this unique relationship with Gagil and the outer islands may appear exploitative, researchers such as Lessa and Lingenfelter maintain that the relationship was mostly mutual and, in most cases, was more beneficial to the Carolinians than to the Yapese. Some also suggested that the so-called empire was formed out of conquest and "blackmail" through sorcery and economics.Petersen, G (2000). Indigenous island empires: Yap and Tonga considered. The Journal of Pacific History, 35(1) p. 14 para. 2. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/25169463.pdf?refreqid=excelsior%3A940a5cd783d60539625e4b2646c2fa49&ab_segments=0%2Fbasic_search_gsv2%2Fcontrol&origin=&initiator=

There are also oral accounts that may have indicated that Ifalik entered the supra-island political system through invasion. However, there is little archaeological or linguistic evidence that indicates signs of forced military invasion.Fox, J & Sather, C (ed.) (1996). Origins, ancestry and alliance: Explorations in Austronesian ethnography. "Ch.4: Rank, hierarchy and routes of migration: Chieftainship in the central Caroline Islands of Micronesia", para. 7. Australia: Australian National University Press. Retrieved from https://press-files.anu.edu.au/downloads/press/p63701/html/ch04s05.html

The outer islands from the east were essentially considered members of the Yapese lower castes. As such, even chiefs were from the east had the same social ranking as that of Yapese serfs on the main islands. These outer islanders were therefore expected to show deference to their Yapese overlords and were not permitted to marry Yapese.Fox, J & Sather, C (ed.) (1996). Origins, ancestry and alliance: Explorations in Austronesian ethnography. "Ch. 4: Rank, hierarchy and routes of migration: Chieftainship in the central Caroline Islands of Micronesia", para. 5. Australia: Australian National University Press. Retrieved from https://press-files.anu.edu.au/downloads/press/p63701/html/ch04s05.html

In addition to the larger sawey tribute system, smaller and more localised system of trade and tribute was practised among Lamotrek, Satawal and Elato until the 1950s. This relationship was known as the ke ("fish hook") system. Lamotrek was considered to be the dominant island and controlled the other two. As such, Satawal and Elato were required to present semi-annual tributes to Lamotrek as a sign of deference.Fox, J & Sather, C (ed.) (1996). Origins, ancestry and alliance: Explorations in Austronesian ethnography. "Ch.4: Rank, hierarchy and routes of migration: Chieftainship in the central Caroline Islands of Micronesia", para. 9-11. Australia: Australian National University Press. Retrieved from https://press-files.anu.edu.au/downloads/press/p63701/html/ch04s05.html

The United States administration of the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands after the Second World War found it challenging to operate through the Yapese institution due to the lack of cooperation and engagement on the part of the Yapese.Lessa, W (1950). The place of Ulithi in the Yap Empire. Human Organization, 9(1) p. 14 para. 5. Society for Applied Anthropology. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/44124303.pdf?refreqid=excelsior%3Ad3d6abd02f4817ee6268f0eedb2b7b4a&ab_segments=0%2Fbasic_search_gsv2%2Fcontrol&origin=&initiator=

The Empire was also bound to disintegrate due to multiple other factors. One such factor was through the spread of Christianity, particularly Catholicism, and modern education. These acted as a wedge between Yap, which was mostly pagan during the Spanish and German periods of colonisation, and the other islands of the Empire, which were mostly Catholic. The Japanese imperial administration and US administration of the islands also built and maintained schools which further challenged the Empire's institutions, acting as an equaliser.Lessa, W (1950). The place of Ulithi in the Yap Empire. Human Organization, 9(1) p. 18 para. 1. Society for Applied Anthropology. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/44124303.pdf?refreqid=excelsior%3Ad3d6abd02f4817ee6268f0eedb2b7b4a&ab_segments=0%2Fbasic_search_gsv2%2Fcontrol&origin=&initiator=

Modern Western and Japanese modes of transport also helped disintegrate the Empire. The Japanese restricted traditional forms of inter-island transport through native canoes. This meant that the historically large canoe fleets that were bound to assemble in Ulithi for Yap to make the tribute payments could no longer do so, resulting in a decline in the art and use of traditional navigation methods. Traditional canoes were replaced with more modern naval vessels.Lessa, W (1950). The place of Ulithi in the Yap Empire. Human Organization, 9(1) p. 18 para. 2. Society for Applied Anthropology. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/44124303.pdf?refreqid=excelsior%3Ad3d6abd02f4817ee6268f0eedb2b7b4a&ab_segments=0%2Fbasic_search_gsv2%2Fcontrol&origin=&initiator=

Category:Former territorial entities in Oceania

Category:States and territories established in the 10th century

Category:10th-century establishments in Oceania

Category:History of Micronesia

Category:Overseas empires