bakhar
{{Short description|Marathi-language historical narrative}}
{{Other uses}}
File:Page_from_Sabahsad_bakhar_(1).jpg
Bakhar is a form of historical narrative written in Marathi prose. {{Transliteration|mr|Bakhars}} are one of the earliest genres of medieval Marathi literature. More than 200 bakhars were written in the seventeenth to nineteenth centuries, the most important of them chronicling the deeds of the Maratha ruler Shivaji.{{Citation needed|date=November 2022}} Bakhars are considered valuable resources depicting the Maratha view of history .
Etymology
Most scholars believe that the word {{Transliteration|mr|bakhar}} is a metathesis of the Arabic-origin word khabar ("information"). S. N. Joshi argues that the word is derived from the Persian word khair or bakhair ("all is well", the end salutation in a letter), since it appears at the end of most texts. Bapuji Sankpal argued that the word is derived from the Sanskrit-origin word akhyayika ("story") or it could be bhyaakh ( bhiyakhya).{{cite book|last=Deshpande|first=Prachi |title=Creative pasts: historical memory and identity in western India, 1700-1960|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=U5FdJnnDhSwC&pg=PA78|accessdate=3 June 2011|year=2007|publisher=Columbia University Press|isbn=978-0-231-12486-7|pages=19–39}}
Style
The principal characteristics of {{Transliteration|mr|bakhars}} are that they were written in prose, had a forceful style of writing, were of political historical nature which appealed to Maratha patriotism, were often commissioned by a patron, displayed an acceptance of tradition and also a belief in the supernatural. Early {{Transliteration|mr|bakhars}} were sparsely written and contained a number of words of Persian derivation, later works tended to be voluminous and contained Sanskritised prose.
History
The earliest dates associated with a {{Transliteration|mr|bakhar}} are 1448 or 1455, by different authors, being considered as the year that the prose part of "Mahikavatichi Bakhar", comprising the second and third chapters, was written by Keshavacharya.{{cite book|last=Tulpule|first=Shankar Gopal|title=Classical Marāṭhī literature: from the beginning to A.D. 1818|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=hAQTcWmz5nUC&pg=PA443|accessdate=28 July 2011|year=1979|publisher=Otto Harrassowitz Verlag|isbn=978-3-447-02047-3|pages=443–446}} The {{Transliteration|mr|bakhar}}, which is the compilation of three authors of the 15th and 16th centuries - Bhagwan, Datta and Keshavacharya - is significant as the earliest attempt at uniting the Marathi-speaking populace against oppressive Bahmani rule.
There are around 200 known {{Transliteration|mr|bakhars}}, fifty or so of which are considered to be notable, while some others have not been published at all.{{cite book|last=Datta|first=Amaresh|title=The Encyclopaedia Of Indian Literature (Volume One (A To Devo)|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ObFCT5_taSgC&pg=PA330|accessdate=28 July 2011|date=1 January 2006|publisher=Sahitya Akademi|isbn=978-81-260-1803-1|pages=329–331}} All the {{Transliteration|mr|bakhars}} except for the early works, such as Sabhasad Bakhar, 91 Kalmi Bakhar and the Ajnyapatra Bakhar besides others, are considered to be written between 1760 and 1850 during the heyday of the Peshwas.
At least eleven {{Transliteration|mr|bakhars}} have been written principally about Shivaji's life and rule, of which Sabhasad Bakhar, 91 Kalmi Bakhar are the most important, some others being derivations of Sabhasad Bakhar of varying reliability. These have been valuable resource material for historians chronicling Shivali's life and achievements.
List of {{Transliteration|mr|bakhars}}
Some of the {{Transliteration|mr|bakhars}} include:
Reliability
Most historians have long neglected as unreliable, due to their colourful literary style with elements of Marathi, Sanskrit aphorisms and Persian administrative jargon. However, {{Transliteration|mr|bakhars}} are recently being investigated for their historical content.
James Grant Duff relied on {{Transliteration|mr|bakhars}} in the making of his "History of the Marathas". Shankar Gopal Tulpule described the {{Transliteration|mr|bakhars}} as a reliable source of history, while the Indian nationalist historian Vishwanath Kashinath Rajwade (1864–1926) described them as "full of meaningless verbosity" and "fragmented, contradictory, vague and unreliable". Jadunath Sarkar (1870–1958) also described them as "collections of gossip and tradition, sometimes no better than opium-eaters' tales".