coastwise slave trade
{{Slavery}}
File:View of the Port at New Orleans circa 1855 by Scattergood.jpg]]
The coastwise slave trade existed along the southern and eastern coastal areas of the United States in the antebellum years prior to 1861. Hundreds of vessels of various capacities domestically traded loads of slaves along waterways, generally from the Upper South which had a surplus of slaves to the Deep South where new cotton plantations created high demand for labor.
International tensions developed when ships were forced by weather or incident into ports in Bermuda and the British West Indies, as the British freed the slaves as part of the banned trade on the high seas, even before its abolition of slavery in its territories in 1834. There were several cases: Comet (1830), Encomium (1833), Enterprise (1835), Hermosa (1840), and, most notably, the Creole case of 1841, the result of a ship slave revolt that forced the vessel into Nassau, Bahamas. British officials freed the 128 slaves who chose to stay in the Bahamas.
Legal rights
Prior to 1807, the 1787 United States Constitution and the 1793 Fugitive Slave Act were the only national United States laws on slavery. Individual states had enacted laws authorizing and regulating slavery within their boundaries.
The multi-faceted 1807 Act Prohibiting Importation of Slaves abolished the "importation of slaves" from Africa, effective in 1808. The United States and Great Britain patrolled to create an international Blockade of Africa, trying to suppress the slave trade. In addition, American and British ships patrolled the Caribbean, where illegal slaves were generally brought for sale to the sugar plantations and smuggling into the United States.
The 1807 Act also regulated the United States' "coastwise slave trade"; it protected shipping by domestic slave traders between markets along the other slave trading coasts. Attorneys argued that ships at sea were an extension of United States sovereignty, which permitted domestic slave trade among the states.
Conflict between the United States and Britain in the Caribbean
Complications developed between the United States and Great Britain from their differing interpretations of the application of laws against the slave trade in the Caribbean colonies. When American merchant ships were forced by weather or incident into ports in Bermuda and the British West Indies, the British freed the slaves as part of the banned trade on the high seas, even before its abolition of slavery in its territories in 1834. As early as 1825, the Home Office in London had ruled that "any slave brought to the Bahamas from outside the British West Indies would be manumitted, which led to 300 slaves owned by U.S. nationals being freed."[https://books.google.com/books?id=XTLFKrmJPgcC&q=%22children+of+the+enterprise%22+musson Gerald Horne, Negro Comrades of the Crown: African Americans and the British Empire Fight the U.S. Before Emancipation], New York University (NYU) Press, 2012, p. 103 In addition, slaves who escaped to the Bahamas from Florida became free.
Several cases occurred as anti-slavery agitation increased and abolition was passed: Comet (1830), Encomium (1833), Enterprise (1835), and Hermosa (1840) In each case, the British freed the slaves from the ships that had put into ports in Bermuda and the Bahamas, whether by weather or accident.Horne (2012), pp. 107-108
The most notable case was the 1841 Creole, the result of a ship slave revolt that forced the vessel into Nassau, Bahamas. One of the slave leaders had heard of slaves being freed from the Hermosa there the previous year.[https://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/2717095?uid=3738032&uid=2129&uid=2134&uid=2&uid=70&uid=4&sid=56236344963 Jervey, Edward D. and Huber, C. Harold. "The Creole Affair"], The Journal of Negro History, Vol. 65, No. 3 (Summer 1980), pp. 196–211, accessed 8 April 2013
Holding that the slaves were free persons illegally detained in slavery, British officials ultimately freed the 128 of 135 slaves from the Creole who chose to stay in the Bahamas. It has been termed the "most successful slave revolt in U.S. history".{{cite news|title=Brig Creole slaves|first=Michael Paul|last=Williams|url=http://www.timesdispatch.com/special-section/black-history/brig-creole-slaves/article_11391522-9222-5006-95eb-c1db7f61f9b4.html|newspaper=Richmond Times-Dispatch|location=Richmond, VA|date=February 11, 2002|accessdate=February 2, 2010}} The US slaveholders feared this would encourage other slave ship revolts.
Selected list of laws and court rulings
The following are generally considered the most important United States statutory laws and case laws on slavery, in the order of their enactment:{{citation needed|date=April 2013}}
:1787: United States Constitution
:1793: Fugitive Slave Act
:1807: Act Prohibiting Importation of Slaves
:1841: United States v. The Amistad[http://muse.jhu.edu/login?auth=0&type=summary&url=/journals/civil_war_history/v034/34.1.cornish.pdf Dudley T. Cornish, Mutiny on the Amistad: The Saga of a Slave Revolt and Its Impact on American Abolition, Law, and Diplomacy (review)], Civil War History, Volume 34, Number 1, March 1988, pp. 79-80, Project Muse 10.1353/cwh.1988.0011, accessed 30 March 2013. Note: The historian Samuel Eliot Morison in 1965 described the Amistad case as the most important court case involving slavery before being eclipsed by that of Dred Scott.
:1850: Fugitive Slave Act
:1857: Dred Scott v. Sandford
Cabotage
See also
References
{{reflist}}
{{Slavery in Virginia}}
{{DEFAULTSORT:Coastwise Slave Trade}}
Category:Slavery in the United States