complete algebraic curve

{{more footnotes|date=June 2025}}

In algebraic geometry, a complete algebraic curve is an algebraic curve that is complete as an algebraic variety.

A projective curve, a dimension-one projective variety, is a complete curve. A complete curve (over an algebraically closed field) is projective.{{harvnb|Hartshorne|loc=Ch. III., Exercise 5.8.}} Because of this, over an algebraically closed field, the terms "projective curve" and "complete curve" are usually used interchangeably. Over a more general base scheme, the distinction still matters.

A curve in \mathbb{P}^3 is called an (algebraic) space curve, while a curve in \mathbb{P}^2 is called a plane curve. By means of a projection from a point, any smooth projective curve can be embedded into \mathbb{P}^3;{{harvnb|Hartshorne|loc=Ch. IV., Corollay 3.6.}} thus, up to a projection, every (smooth) curve is a space curve. Up to a birational morphism, every (smooth) curve can be embedded into \mathbb{P}^2 as a nodal curve.{{harvnb|Hartshorne|loc=Ch. IV., Theorem 3.10.}}

Riemann's existence theorem says that the category of compact Riemann surfaces is equivalent to that of smooth projective curves over the complex numbers.

Throughout the article, a curve mean a complete curve (but not necessarily smooth).

Abstract complete curve

Let k be an algebrically closed field. By a function field K over k, we mean a finitely generated field extension of k that is typically not algebraic (i.e., a transcendental extension). The function field of an algebraic variety is a basic example. For a function field of transcendence degree one, the converse holds by the following construction.{{harvnb|Hartshorne|1977|loc=Ch. I, § 6.}} Let C_K denote the set of all discrete valuation rings of K/k. We put the topology on C_K so that the closed subsets are either finite subsets or the whole space. We then make it a locally ringed space by taking \mathcal{O}(U) to be the intersection \cap_{R \in U} R. Then the C_K for various function fields K of transcendence degree one form a category that is equivalent to the category of smooth projective curves.{{harvnb|Hartshorne|1977|loc=Ch. I, § 6. Corollary 6.12.}}

One consequence of the above construction is that a complete smooth curve is projective (since a complete smooth curve of C corresponds to C_K, K = k(C), which corresponds to a projective smooth curve.)

Smooth completion of an affine curve

{{expand section|date=June 2025}}

Let C_0 = V(f) \subset \mathbb{A}^2 be a smooth affine curve given by a polynomial f in two variables. The closure \overline{C_0} in \mathbb{P}^2, the projective completion of it, may or may not be smooth. The normalization C of \overline{C_0} is smooth and contains C_0 as an open dense subset. Then the curve C is called the smooth completion of C_0.{{harvnb|ACGH|1985|loc=Ch I, Exercise A.}} (Note the smooth completion of C_0 is unique up to isomorphism since two smooth curves are isomorphic if they are birational to each other.)

For example, if f = y^2 - x^3 + 1, then \overline{C_0} is given by y^2 z = x^3 - z^3, which is smooth (by a Jacobian computation). On the other hand, consider f = y^2 - x^6 + 1. Then, by a Jacobian computation, \overline{C_0} is not smooth. In fact, C_0 is an (affine) hyperelliptic curve and a hyperelliptic curve is not a plane curve (since a hyperelliptic curve is never a complete intersection in a projective space).

Over the complex numbers, C is a compact Riemann surface that is classically called the Riemann surface associated to the algebraic function y(x) when f(x, y(x)) \equiv 0. Conversely, each compact Riemann surface is of that form;{{fact|date=June 2025}} this is known as the Riemann existence theorem.

A map from a curve to a projective space

{{main|Linear system of divisors}}

To give a rational map from a (projective) curve C to a projective space is to give a linear system of divisors V on C, up to the fixed part of the system? (need to be clarified); namely, when B is the base locus (the common zero sets of the nonzero sections in V), there is:

:f: C - B \to \mathbb{P}(V^*)

that maps each point P in C - B to the hyperplane \{ s \in V | s(P) = 0 \}. Conversely, given a rational map f from C to a projective space,

In particular, one can take the linear system to be the canonical linear system |K| = \mathbb{P}(\Gamma(C, \omega_C)) and the corresponding map is called the canonical map.

Let g be the genus of a smooth curve C. If g = 0, then |K| is empty while if g = 1, then |K| = 0. If g \ge 2, then the canonical linear system |K| can be shown to have no base point and thus determines the morphism f : C \to \mathbb{P}^{g-1}. If the degree of f or equivalently the degree of the linear system is 2, then C is called a hyperelliptic curve.

Max Noether's theorem implies that a non-hyperelliptic curve is projectively normal when it is embedded into a projective space by the canonical divisor.

Classification of smooth algebraic curves in <math>\mathbb{P}^3</math>

The classification of a smooth projective curve begins with specifying a genus. For genus zero, there is only one: the projective line \mathbb{P}^1 (up to isomorphism). A genus-one curve is precisely an elliptic curve and isomorphism classes of elliptic curves are specified by a j-invariant (which is an element of the base field). The classification of genus-2 curves is much more complicated; here is some partial result over an algebraically closed field of characteristic not two:{{harvnb|Hartshorne|loc=Ch. IV., Exercise 2.2.}}

  • Each genus-two curve X comes with the map f: X \to \mathbb{P}^1 determined by the canonical divisor; called the canonical map. The canonical map has exactly 6 ramified points of index 2.
  • Conversely, given distinct 6 points a_1, \dots, a_6, let K be the field extension of k(x), x a variable, given by the equation y^2 = (x-a_1) \cdots (x-a_6) and f : X \to \mathbb{P}^1 the map corresponding to the extension. Then X is a genus-two curve and f ramifies exactly over those six points.

For genus \ge 3, the following terminology is used:{{cn|date=June 2025}}

  • Given a smooth curve C, a divisor D on it and a vector subspace V \subset H^0(C, \mathcal{O}(D)), one says the linear system \mathbb{P}(V) is a grd if V has dimension r+1 and D has degree d. One says C has a grd if there is such a linear system.

Fundamental group

Let X be a smooth complete algebraic curve.{{clarify|"smooth" and "complete" are unnecessary?|date=June 2025}} Then the étale fundamental group of X is defined as:

:\pi_1(X) = \varprojlim_{L/K} \operatorname{Gal}(L/K)

where K is the function field of X and L/K is a Galois extension.{{harvnb|Hartshorne|1977|loc=Ch. IV., Exercise 4.8.}}

Specific curves

= Canonical curve =

If X is a nonhyperelliptic curve of genus \ge 3, then the linear system |K| associated to the canonical divisor is very ample; i.e., it gives an embedding into the projective space. The image of that embedding is then called a canonical curve.{{harvnb|Hartshorne|1977|loc=Ch. IV., § 5.}}

= Stable curve =

A stable curve is a connected nodal curve with finite automorphism group.{{cn|date=June 2025}}

= Spectral curve =

{{empty section|date=July 2022}}

Vector bundles on a curve

= Line bundles and dual graph =

Let X be a possibly singular curve over complex numbers. Then

:0 \to \mathbb{C}^* \to (\mathbb{C}^*)^r \to \Gamma(X, \mathcal{F}) \to \operatorname{Pic}(X) \to \operatorname{Pic}(\widetilde{X}) \to 0.

where r is the number of irreducible components of X, \pi:\widetilde{X} \to X is the normalization and \mathcal{F} = \pi_* \mathcal{O}_{\widetilde{X}}/\mathcal{O}_X. (To get this use the fact \operatorname{Pic}(X) = \operatorname{H}^1(X, \mathcal{O}_X^*) and \operatorname{Pic}(\widetilde{X}) = \operatorname{H}^1(\widetilde{X}, \mathcal{O}_{\widetilde{X}}^*) = \operatorname{H}^1(X, \pi_* \mathcal{O}_{\widetilde{X}}^*).)

Taking the long exact sequence of the exponential sheaf sequence gives the degree map:

:\deg: \operatorname{Pic}(X) \to \operatorname{H}^2(X; \mathbb{Z}) \simeq \mathbb{Z}^r.

By definition, the Jacobian variety J(X) of X is the identity component of the kernel of this map. Then the previous exact sequence gives:

:0 \to \mathbb{C}^* \to (\mathbb{C}^*)^r \to \Gamma(\widetilde{X}, \mathcal{F}) \to J(X) \to J(\widetilde{X}) \to 0.

We next define the dual graph of X; a one-dimensional CW complex defined as follows. (related to whether a curve is of compact type or not)

= The Jacobian of a curve =

Let C be a smooth connected curve. Given an integer d, let \operatorname{Pic}^d C denote the set of isomorphism classes of line bundles on C of degree d. It can be shown to have a structure of an algebraic variety.

For each integer d > 0, let C^d, C_d denote respectively the d-th fold Cartesian and symmetric product of C; by definition, C_d is the quotient of C^d by the symmetric group permuting the factors.

Fix a base point p_0 of C. Then there is the map

:u: C_d \to J(C).

= Stable bundles on a curve =

{{main|stable bundle}}

The Jacobian of a curve can be generalized to higher-rank vector bundles; a key notion introduced by Mumford that allows for a moduli construction is that of stability.

Let C be a connected smooth curve. A rank-2 vector bundle E on C is said to be stable if for every line subbundle L of E,

:\operatorname{deg} L < {1 \over 2} \operatorname{deg} E.

Given some line bundle L on C, let SU_C(2, L) denote the set of isomorphism classes of rank-2 stable bundles E on C whose determinants are isomorphic to L.

= Generalization: <math>\operatorname{Bun}_G(C)</math> =

{{main|moduli stack of principal bundles}}

The osculating behavior of a curve

{{unreferenced section|date=June 2025}}

= Vanishing sequence =

Given a linear series V on a curve X, the image of it under \operatorname{ord}_p is a finite set and following the tradition we write it as

:a_0(V, p) < a_1(V, p) < \cdots < a_r(V, p).

This sequence is called the vanishing sequence. For example, a_0(V, p) is the multiplicity of a base point p. We think of higher a_i(V, p) as encoding information about inflection of the Kodaira map \varphi_V. The ramification sequence is then

:b_i(V, p) = a_i(V, p) - i.

Their sum is called the ramification index of p. The global ramification is given by the following formula:

{{math theorem|name=Plücker formula|

:\sum_{p \in X} \sum_0^r b_i(V, p) = (r+1)(d + r(g-1)).}}

= Bundle of principal parts =

{{main|Bundle of principal parts}}

{{empty section|date=June 2025}}

Uniformization

{{expand section|date=June 2025}}

An elliptic curve X over the complex numbers has a uniformization

\mathbb{C} \to X

given by taking the quotient by a lattice.{{cn|date=June 2025}}

Relative curve

A relative curve or a curve over a scheme S or a relative curve is a flat morphism of schemes X \to S such that each geometric fiber is an algebraic curve; in other words, it is a family of curves parametrized by the base scheme S.{{cn|date=June 2025}}

See also Semistable reduction theorem.

= The Mumford–Tate uniformization =

This generalizes the classical construction due to Tate (cf. Tate curve){{cite book | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=bTJ8CwAAQBAJ&pg=PR3 | title=Schottky Groups and Mumford Curves | isbn=9783540383048 | last1=Gerritzen | first1=L. | last2=Van Der Put | first2=M. | date=14 November 2006 | publisher=Springer }} Given a smooth projective curve of genus at least two and has a split degeneration.{{harvnb|Mumford|1972}}

See also

Notes

{{reflist}}

References

  • E. Arbarello, M. Cornalba, P.A. Griffiths, and J. Harris, Geometry of algebraic curves. Vol. I, Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften, vol. 267, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1985. MR0770932
  • E. Arbarello, M. Cornalba, and P.A. Griffiths, Geometry of algebraic curves. Vol. II, with a contribution by Joseph Daniel Harris, Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften, vol. 268, Springer, Heidelberg, 2011. MR-2807457
  • {{Hartshorne AG}}
  • {{cite book

| last = Mukai

| first = S.

| year = 2002

| title = An introduction to invariants and moduli

| series = Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics

| volume = 81

| isbn = 978-0-521-80906-1

| url = http://www.cambridge.org/catalogue/catalogue.asp?isbn=0521809061

}}

  • Mumford, D.: An analytic construction of degenerating curves over complete local rings. Compos. Math. 24, 129–174 (1972)
  • {{cite journal |last1=McMcallum |first1=W. |last2=Poonen |first2=B. |title= The method of Chabauty and Coleman |volume=32 |date=2012 |journal=Panoramas et Synthèses |pages= 99–117}}
  • {{cite book |last1=Shimura |first1=Gorō |title=Introduction to the Arithmetic Theory of Automorphic Functions |date=21 August 1971 |publisher=Princeton University Press |isbn=978-0-691-08092-5 |url= https://books.google.com/books?id=-PFtGa9fZooC}}
  • {{cite arXiv |last1=Voight |first1=John |last2=Zureick-Brown |first2=David |title=The canonical ring of a stacky curve |date=16 March 2022 |class=math.AG |eprint=1501.04657 }}
  • {{cite book |url={{Google books|U-UlBQAAQBAJ|pg=281|plainurl=yes}} | isbn=978-1-4757-2189-8 | title=Algebraic Geometry: A First Course | date=11 November 2013 | publisher=Springer }}

Further reading

  • {{cite book

| last1=Griffiths | first1=Phillip | authorlink1=Phillip Griffiths

| last2=Harris | first2=Joe | authorlink2=Joe Harris (mathematician)

| year = 1994

| title = Principles of Algebraic Geometry

| publisher = Wiley-Interscience

| isbn = 978-0-471-05059-9

| zbl = 0836.14001

}}

  • {{cite book |url={{Google books|CiXyBwAAQBAJ|page=16|plainurl=yes}} |doi=10.1007/978-3-0348-8617-8_4 |chapter=The Riemann Surface of an Algebraic Function |title=Compact Riemann Surfaces |year=1992 |last1=Narasimhan |first1=Raghavan |pages=15–16 |isbn=978-3-7643-2742-2 }}
  • {{cite web|title=Riemann Surfaces §4.2.3 The Riemann surface of an algebraic function |url=http://www.math.tifr.res.in/~publ/pamphlets/riemann.pdf}}

Category:Algebraic curves