context
{{Short description|Non-language factors that enhance understanding of communication}}
{{other uses}}
{{redirects here|Focal event|focal seizural events|focal seizure}}
In semiotics, linguistics, sociology and anthropology, context refers to those objects or entities which surround a focal event, in these disciplines typically a communicative event, of some kind. Context is "a frame that surrounds the event and provides resources for its appropriate interpretation".{{cite encyclopedia |editor1-first=Charles |editor1-last=Goodwin|editor2-last=Duranti |editor2-first=Alessandro |encyclopedia=Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon |title=Rethinking context: an introduction |url=http://www.sscnet.ucla.edu/anthro/faculty/duranti/reprints/rethco.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20030312200748/http://www.sscnet.ucla.edu/anthro/faculty/duranti/reprints/rethco.pdf |url-status=dead |archive-date=March 12, 2003 |access-date=February 19, 2017 |year=1992 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |location=Cambridge |pages=1–42}}{{rp|2–3}} It is thus a relative concept, only definable with respect to some focal event within a frame, not independently of that frame.
In linguistics
In the 19th century, it was debated whether the most fundamental principle in language was contextuality or compositionality, and compositionality was usually preferred.Janssen, T. M. (2012) [https://pure.uva.nl/ws/files/1159272/105371_HandbookJanssen.pdf Compositionality: Its historic context], in M. Werning, W. Hinzen, & E. Machery (Eds.), [https://books.google.com/books?id=-UYfAQAAQBAJ&pg=PA655 The Oxford handbook of compositionality], pp. 19-46, Oxford University Press. Verbal context refers to the text or speech surrounding an expression (word, sentence, or speech act). Verbal context influences the way an expression is understood; hence the norm of not citing people out of context. Since much contemporary linguistics takes texts, discourses, or conversations as the object of analysis, the modern study of verbal context takes place in terms of the analysis of discourse structures and their mutual relationships, for instance the coherence relation between sentences.
Neurolinguistic analysis of context has shown that the interaction between interlocutors defined as parsers creates a reaction in the brain that reflects predictive and interpretative reactions. It can be said then that mutual knowledge, co-text, genre, speakers, hearers create a neurolinguistic composition of context.{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=gcl-N7FZPA4C&q=what+is+context+linguistics|title=What is a Context?: Linguistic Approaches and Challenges|last1=Finkbeiner|first1=Rita|last2=Meibauer|first2=Jörg|last3=Schumacher|first3=Petra B.|date=2012|publisher=John Benjamins Publishing|isbn=978-9027255792|language=en}}
Traditionally, in sociolinguistics, social contexts were defined in terms of objective social variables, such as those of class, gender, age or race. More recently, social contexts tend to be defined in terms of the social identity being construed and displayed in text and talk by language users.{{cn|date=October 2024}}
The influence of context parameters on language use or discourse is usually studied in terms of language variation, style or register (see Stylistics). The basic assumption here is that language users adapt the properties of their language use (such as intonation, lexical choice, syntax, and other aspects of formulation) to the current communicative situation. In this sense, language use or discourse may be called more or less 'appropriate' in a given context.{{cn|date=October 2024}}
In linguistic anthropology
In the theory of sign phenomena, adapted from that of Charles Sanders Peirce, which forms the basis for much contemporary work in linguistic anthropology, the concept of context is integral to the definition of the index, one of the three classes of signs comprising Peirce's second trichotomy. An index is a sign which signifies by virtue of "pointing to" some component in its context, or in other words an indexical sign is related to its object by virtue of their co-occurrence within some kind of contextual frame.{{cite encyclopedia |last=Silverstein |first=Michael |author-link=Michael Silverstein |editor1-last=Auer |editor1-first=Peter |editor2-last=Di Luzio |editor2-first=Aldo |encyclopedia=The Contextualization of Language |title=The Indeterminacy of Contextualization: When Is Enough Enough? |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=lhq7IN0IAUAC&q=%22indeterminacy+of+contextualization%22&pg=PA55 |access-date=February 19, 2017 |year=1992 |publisher=John Benjamins Publishing Company |location=Amsterdam |pages=55–76|isbn=978-9027250346 }}
In natural language processing
In word-sense disambiguation, the meanings of words are inferred from the context where they occur.{{cite book|author1=Anind Dey|author2=Boicho Kokinov|author3=David Leake|author4=Roy Turner|title=Modeling and Using Context: 5th International and Interdisciplinary Conference, CONTEXT 2005, Paris, France, July 5-8, 2005, Proceedings|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=_OOap9Ui9JAC&q=disambiguation|date=24 June 2005|publisher=Springer Science & Business Media|isbn=978-3-540-26924-3}}
Contextual variables
Communicative systems presuppose contexts that are structured in terms of particular physical and communicative dimensions, for instance time, location, and communicative role.{{citation needed|date=December 2019}}
See also
References
{{Reflist}}
Further reading
- For a review of the history of the principle of contextuality in linguistics, see Scholtz, Oliver Robert (1999) Verstehen und Rationalität: Untersuchungen zu den Grundlagen von Hermeneutik und Sprachphilosophie
{{Formal semantics}}
{{Authority control}}