contingency (electrical grid)

The contingency analysis application periodically runs on the computers at the operations centers providing suggestions to the operators based on the current state of the grid and the contingency selection.{{sfn|Wood|Wollenberg|1984|p=357}} The software provides answers to the "what if" scenarios in the form of "alarms": "Loss of component X will result in overload of Y by Z%".{{sfn|Balu|Bertram|Bose|Brandwajn|1992|p=268}} By the 1990s analysis of a large interconnected system involved testing of many thousands of contingency events (millions if double contingencies were considered). An effect of each contingency requires performing a power flow calculation. Due to the rapid change of the state of a power system the run of the application shall complete in minutes (up to 30{{sfn|Hadjsaid|2017|p=24-3}}) for the results to be useful.{{sfn|Balu|Bertram|Bose|Brandwajn|1992|p=269}} Typically only selected contingencies, mostly single ones with some double ones are considered to speed up the process. The selection of contingencies is using engineering judgment to choose the ones most likely to cause problems.{{sfn|Hadjsaid|2017|p=24-3}}

The foreseen and analyzed contingencies are called credible. Examples of these are failures of:{{sfn|Heylen|De Boeck|Ovaere|Ergun|2018|p=25}}

• a transmission line or tie line / HVDC link;
• a generator;
• a transformer;
• a variable renewable energy cluster;
• a voltage compensation device.

In continental Europe these contingencies are considered "normal", with "exceptional" credible contingencies being the failures of:{{sfn|Heylen|De Boeck|Ovaere|Ergun|2018|p=25}}

• a double circuit transmission line;
• two generators;
• a bus bar.

Non-credible (also called "out-of-range") contingencies are not used in planning, as they are rare and their effects are hard to predict, for example, failures of:{{sfn|Heylen|De Boeck|Ovaere|Ergun|2018|p=25}}

• an entire electrical substation;
• a transmission tower that carries more than two lines.

Reliability of the energy supply usually requires that any single major unit failure leaves the system with enough resources to supply the current load. The system that satisfies this requirement is described as meeting the N-1 contingency criterion (N designates the number of pieces of equipment). The N-2 and N-3 contingency refers to planning for a simultaneous loss of, respectively, 2 or 3 major units; this is sometimes done for the critical area (e.g. downtown).{{sfn|Willis|2004|p=499}} The term "N-1 security assessment" is also used.{{sfn|IBRR|2016|pp=65-66}}

The N-1 requirement is used throughout the network, from generation to substations. At the distribution level, however, the planners frequently allow a more relaxed interpretation: a single failure should ensure uninterrupted delivery of power to almost all the customers at least at the "emergency level" (Range B of the ANSI C84.1{{cite book |last1=ANSI |title=American National Standard for Electric Power Systems and Equipment — Voltage Ratings (60 Hertz) |publisher=American National Standards Institute |url=https://durastudio.com/sites/default/files/ansi_c84-1-20xx_2016_revision_draft_2019-02-15.pdf |chapter=Table 1}}), but a small section of the network that contains the original fault might require manual switching with a service interruption for about an hour.{{sfn|Willis|2004|p=499}}

The popularity of contingency planning is based on its advantages:

• each of the N elements in the system is analyzed separately, limiting the amount of work to be done and simplifying the failure options (e.g., generator failure, short circuit);
• the process inherently provides a way to deal with the contingency if and when it will happen.{{sfn|Willis|2004|p=499}}

The N-1 contingency planning is typically sufficient for the systems with the usual ratio of peak load to capacity (below 70%). For a system with a substantially higher ratio, the N-1 planning will not deliver satisfactory reliability, and even N-2 and N-3 criteria might not be sufficient; therefore the reliability-based planning is used that considers the probabilities of the individual contingencies.{{sfn|Willis|2004|p=499}}

N-1-1 contingency is defined as a single fault followed by manual recovery procedures, with another fault occurring after the successful recovery from the first failure. Normal operating conditions are sometimes referred to as N-0.{{sfn|Wang|Lin|Howell|Morison|2016|p=268}}

• Power system protection

{{Reflist}}

• {{cite book | first1 = H. Lee | last1 = Willis | date = 1 March 2004 | title = Power Distribution Planning Reference Book, Second Edition | edition = 2 | publisher = CRC Press | chapter=Contingency-based planning criteria | pages = 499–500 | isbn = 978-1-4200-3031-0 | chapter-url = https://books.google.com/books?id=9EShPwTRnoUC&pg=PA499}}
• {{cite book | first1 = Allen J. | last1=Wood | first2 = Bruce F. | last2 = Wollenberg | date = 1984 | title = Power Generation, Operation, and Control | publisher = John Wiley & Sons | pages = | isbn = 978-0-471-09182-0 | oclc = 1085785794 | url = https://books.google.com/books?id=dwRtAAAAIAAJ}}
• {{cite book | first1 = Mania | last1 = Pavella | first2 = Damien | last2 = Ernst | first3 = Daniel | last3 = Ruiz-Vega | date = 6 December 2012 | title = Transient Stability of Power Systems: A Unified Approach to Assessment and Control | publisher = Springer Science & Business Media | pages = 6– | isbn = 978-1-4615-4319-0 | oclc = 44650996 | url = https://books.google.com/books?id=3hPpBwAAQBAJ&pg=PA6}}
• {{cite journal | last1 = Balu | first1 = N. | last2 = Bertram | first2 = T. | last3 = Bose | first3 = A. | last4 = Brandwajn | first4 = V. | last5 = Cauley | first5 = G. | last6 = Curtice | first6 = D. | last7 = Fouad | first7 = A. | last8 = Fink | first8 = L. | last9 = Lauby | first9 = M.G. | last10 = Wollenberg | first10 = B.F. | last11 = Wrubel | first11 = J.N. | title = On-line power system security analysis | journal = Proceedings of the IEEE | date = 1992 | volume = 80 | issue = 2 | pages = 262–282 | issn = 0018-9219 | doi = 10.1109/5.123296 | pmid = | url = https://home.engineering.iastate.edu/~jdm/ee554/Security1992.pdf }}
• {{cite book | editor = Leonard L. Grigsby | date = 19 December 2017 | title = Power System Stability and Control | first1 = Nouredine | last1 = Hadjsaid | edition = 3 | publisher = CRC Press | pages = 24-1 to 24-? | isbn = 978-1-4398-8321-1 | chapter = Security Analysis | chapter-url = https://books.google.com/books?id=zrPMBQAAQBAJ&pg=SA24-PA1}}
• {{cite book | title = Dynamic Vulnerability Assessment and Intelligent Control for Sustainable Power Systems | last1 = Heylen | first1 = Evelyn | last2 = De Boeck | first2 = Steven | last3 = Ovaere | first3 = Marten | last4 = Ergun | first4 = Hakan | last5 = Van Hertem | first5 = Dirk | chapter = Steady-State Security | date = 26 January 2018 | pages = 21–40 | publisher = John Wiley & Sons, Ltd | doi = 10.1002/9781119214984.ch2 | isbn = 978-1-119-21495-3 | chapter-url = https://books.google.com/books?id=YbVIDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA21}}
• {{cite book | last1 = Wang | first1 = Lei | last2 = Lin | first2 = Xi | last3 = Howell | first3 = Fred | last4 = Morison | first4 = Kip | chapter = Dynamic Security Assessment | date = 2016 | pages = 265–287 | publisher = John Wiley & Sons, Ltd | doi = 10.1002/9781118755471.sgd090 | chapter-url = https://books.google.com/books?id=iBUWCgAAQBAJ&pg=PA268 | title = Smart Grid Handbook, 3 Volume Set | isbn = 978-1-118-75548-8 }}
• {{cite book |last1=IBRR |title=Smart Grid to Enhance Power Transmission in Vietnam |date=2016 |publisher=International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank |location=Washington, DC |pages=65-66 |url=https://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/779591468187450158/pdf/103719-WP-P131558-PUBLIC-VN-Smart-Grid-Book-2-21-16.pdf |chapter=State Estimation and N-1 Security Assessment}}

{{Electricity delivery}}

Category:Power engineering