decommissioning in Northern Ireland

{{Short description|Agreed decommissioning of weapons}}

{{update|date=February 2020}}

{{EngvarB|date=October 2013}}

{{Use dmy dates|date=May 2024}}

Decommissioning in Northern Ireland was a process in the Belfast Agreement as part of the Northern Ireland peace process. Under the Good Friday Agreement/Belfast Agreement, all paramilitary groups fighting in the Troubles would be subject to decommission.{{cite news

| last = Purdy

| first = Martina

| title = Q&A: Decommissioning in Northern Ireland

| work =

| pages =

| language =

| publisher = BBC

| date = 2 February 2000

| url = http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/northern_ireland/627685.stm

| accessdate = 9 November 2008

| archive-date = 5 March 2016

| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20160305220454/http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/northern_ireland/627685.stm

| url-status = live

}} Decommissioning was a defining issue in the effort to negotiate peace in Northern Ireland.{{cite news

| last = Hoge

| first = Warren

| title = Ulster Talks Miss Goal But Blair Sees Gains

| work =

| pages =

| language =

| publisher = NYT

| date = 2 April 1999

| url = https://www.nytimes.com/1999/04/02/world/ulster-talks-miss-goal-but-blair-sees-gains.html?sq=Arms+decommissioning+in+Northern+Ireland&scp=4&st=cse

| accessdate = 9 November 2008

| archive-date = 29 July 2018

| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20180729081756/https://www.nytimes.com/1999/04/02/world/ulster-talks-miss-goal-but-blair-sees-gains.html?sq=Arms+decommissioning+in+Northern+Ireland&scp=4&st=cse

| url-status = live

}}

Belfast Agreement/Good Friday Agreement

{{main|The Troubles|Belfast Agreement}}

The Belfast Agreement, or Good Friday Agreement, was signed in Belfast on 10 April 1998 (Good Friday) by the British and Irish governments and endorsed by most Northern Ireland political parties.

It contained provisions for a government involving both Catholics and Protestants, whose traditional aspirations, expressed as nationalism on one side and unionism on the other, had often clashed over the years. The Agreement recognised the legitimacy of both aspirations.{{cite news

| last = Holland

| first = Jack

| title = I.R.A. Guns and the Irish Impasse

| work =

| pages =

| language =

| publisher = NYT

| date = 8 July 2001

| url = https://www.nytimes.com/2001/07/08/opinion/ira-guns-and-the-irish-impasse-139378.html?sq=Arms+decommissioning+in+Northern+Ireland&scp=6&st=cse

| accessdate = 9 November 2008}} One of the provisions of the Agreement was that the parties agree to collectively use their influence to achieve decommissioning within two years, by May 2000.

Independent International Commission on Decommissioning

{{main|Independent International Commission on Decommissioning}}

The Independent International Commission on Decommissioning (IICD) was established to oversee the decommissioning. Its objective was to facilitate the decommissioning of firearms, ammunition and explosives.

Decommissioning problems

Into late 2001, the Provisional Irish Republican Army (IRA) was reluctant to disarm, and went on to refuse disarmament, saying that the British government had reneged on its side of the bargain,: specifically:

After the original (May 2000) deadline for decommissioning passed, the Independent International Commission on Decommissioning set 30 June 2001; that date passed, as well, without full disarmament.Hoge, Warren. [https://www.nytimes.com/2000/01/29/world/standoff-on-arms-poses-new-threat-to-ulster-accord.html?sq=Arms+decommissioning+in+Northern+Ireland&scp=9&st=cse STANDOFF ON ARMS POSES NEW THREAT TO ULSTER ACCORD] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180729085048/https://www.nytimes.com/2000/01/29/world/standoff-on-arms-poses-new-threat-to-ulster-accord.html?sq=Arms+decommissioning+in+Northern+Ireland&scp=9&st=cse |date=29 July 2018 }}

The crisis reached its climax in July 2001, as David Trimble, the Ulster Unionist Party leader, resigned as first minister of the power-sharing Northern Ireland Executive, in protest against the IRA's failure to redeem its pledge to put its weapons "completely and verifiably beyond use". (He would later be re-elected.){{cite news

| last = Brown

| first = Derek

| title = Arms decommissioning in Northern Ireland

| work =

| pages =

| language =

| publisher = NYT

| date = 2 July 2001

| url = https://www.theguardian.com/world/2001/jul/02/qanda.northernireland

| accessdate = 9 November 2008

| archive-date = 7 April 2020

| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20200407072047/https://www.theguardian.com/world/2001/jul/02/qanda.northernireland

| url-status = live

}} The peace process was on the brink of collapse again, after the Provisional IRA failed to convince either the UK Government, or the Ulster Unionists, that they had made "sufficient progress towards decommissioning".

Breakthrough

On 7 August 2001, the IRA agreed on a method of destroying its arsenal. Tony Blair, Prime Minister of the United Kingdom at the time, described the breakthrough as "significant" and "historic". General John de Chastelain of Canada, chairman of the Independent International Commission on Decommissioning, said the proposals had been accepted by the panel as ones that would "put IRA arms completely and verifiably beyond use." The Ulster Unionists had said they would no longer take part in the Northern Ireland Assembly if the IRA did not begin disarming. The announcement came after meetings between the commission and a representative of the IRA.{{cite news

| last = Hoge

| first = Warren

| title = NEW IRA STANCE ON ARMS IS HAILED AS BREAKTHROUGH

| work =

| pages =

| language =

| publisher = NYT

| date = 7 August 2001

| url = https://www.nytimes.com/2001/08/07/world/new-ira-stance-on-arms-is-hailed-as-breakthrough.html?sq=Arms+decommissioning+in+Northern+Ireland&scp=5&st=cse

| accessdate = 9 November 2008

| archive-date = 29 July 2018

| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20180729082044/https://www.nytimes.com/2001/08/07/world/new-ira-stance-on-arms-is-hailed-as-breakthrough.html?sq=Arms+decommissioning+in+Northern+Ireland&scp=5&st=cse

| url-status = live

}}

During the process of decommissioning the Democratic Unionist Party demanded that the IRA release photographs of the decommissioning process in order to satisfy the unionist "man in the street".{{cite web |title=Paisley decommissioning claims 'bizarre', says SF |url=https://www.irishtimes.com/news/paisley-decommissioning-claims-bizarre-says-sf-1.1280409 |website=Irish Times |access-date=9 August 2021}} The IRA rejected these claims, claiming it would amount to "humiliation" , and that two clergymen would oversee the process instead.{{cite news |title=IRA says photos 'never possible' |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/northern_ireland/4080697.stm |website=BBC News |date=9 December 2004 |access-date=9 August 2021 |archive-date=8 March 2006 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060308213047/http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/northern_ireland/4080697.stm |url-status=live }}

In June 2009, both the Ulster Volunteer Force and Red Hand Commando announced that they had completed a process of decommissioning. The UDA said it had started a process that would lead to the destruction of all its arms.[http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/northern_ireland/8122375.stm NI decommissioning timetable] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210923161345/http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/northern_ireland/8122375.stm |date=23 September 2021 }}. BBC. 27 June 2009 Originally, both organisations had refused to decommission, claiming that copying the IRA's action would amount to "dancing to their tune".{{cite web |title=Loyalists rule out surrender of arms |url=https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2005/oct/02/uk.northernireland |website=The Guardian |date=2 October 2005 |access-date=9 August 2021 |archive-date=17 April 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210417193725/https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2005/oct/02/uk.northernireland |url-status=live }}

Timeline

See also

References