differential K theory
{{DISPLAYTITLE:Differential K theory}}
In psychology and criminology, Differential K theory is a debunked hypothesis first proposed by Canadian psychologist J. Philippe Rushton in 1985,{{cite journal|last=Rushton|first=J. Philippe|authorlink=J. Philippe Rushton|title=Differential K theory: The sociobiology of individual and group differences|journal=Personality and Individual Differences|date=January 1985|volume=6|issue=4|pages=441–452|doi=10.1016/0191-8869(85)90137-0}} which attempts to apply r/K selection theory to human races.{{Cite web |title=Statement from the Department of Psychology regarding research conducted by Dr. J. Philippe Rushton |url=https://psychology.uwo.ca/people/faculty/remembrance/rushton.html |website=Department of Psychology, University of Western Ontario}} According to Rushton, this theory explains race differences in fertility, IQ, criminality, and sexual anatomy and behavior.{{cite journal|last1=Weizmann|first1=Fredric|last2=Wiener|first2=Neil I.|last3=Wiesenthal|first3=David L.|last4=Ziegler|first4=Michael|title=Differential K theory and racial hierarchies.|journal=Canadian Psychology|date=1990|volume=31|issue=1|pages=1–13|doi=10.1037/h0078934}} The theory also hypothesizes that a single factor, the "K factor", affects multiple population statistics Rushton referred to as "life-history traits".{{cite journal|last=Templer|first=Donald I.|authorlink=Donald Templer|title=Correlational and factor analytic support for Rushton's differential K life history theory|journal=Personality and Individual Differences|date=October 2008|volume=45|issue=6|pages=440–444|doi=10.1016/j.paid.2008.05.010}} It has been criticized as a key example of scientific racism and devoid of empirical basis.{{Cite web |last=Winston |first=Andrew S. |date=29 May 2020 |title=Scientific Racism and North American Psychology |url=https://oxfordre.com/psychology/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190236557.001.0001/acrefore-9780190236557-e-516; |website=Oxford Research Encyclopedias: Psychology|doi=10.1093/acrefore/9780190236557.013.516 |isbn=978-0-19-023655-7 }}{{Cite journal |last1=Weizmann |first1=Frederic |last2=Wiener |first2=Neil I. |last3=Wiesenthal |first3=David L. |last4=Ziegler |first4=Michael |date=1989 |title=Scientific racism in contemporary psychology |url=https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1997-72991-001 |journal=International Journal of Dynamic Assessment & Instruction |volume=1 |issue=1 |pages=81–93}}
Reception
As Andrew Winston summarizes, "Rushton's work was heavily criticized by psychologists, evolutionary biologists, anthropologists, and geneticists for severe scientific inadequacies, fundamental errors, inappropriate conceptualization of race, inappropriate statistical comparisons, misuse of sources, and serious logical errors and flaws." Differential K theory in particular was described in a 2020 statement by Rushton's former department at Western Ontario University as "thoroughly debunked."
Weizmann et al. argued that Rushton attempted to validate this hypothesis by use of "selective citation and misrepresentation of the research literature and by the use of unreliable sources" and that Rushton's methodology "indicates a lack of familiarity with ecological thinking and scientific method in general."{{cite journal|last1=Anderson|first1=Judith L.|title=Rushton's racial comparisons: An ecological critique of theory and method.|journal=Canadian Psychology|date=1991|volume=32|issue=1|pages=51–62|doi=10.1037/h0078956}}
See also
References
{{Reflist}}
Category:Psychological theories
Category:Race and intelligence controversy
{{Psychology-stub}}