hyperphantasia
{{Short description|Condition of having extremely vivid mental imagery}}
Hyperphantasia is the condition of having extremely vivid mental imagery.{{Cite web| vauthors = Cossins D |date=5 June 2019|title=How people with extreme imagination are helping explain consciousness|url=https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg24232330-300-how-people-with-extreme-imagination-are-helping-explain-consciousness/|access-date=2021-03-10|website=New Scientist|language=en-US}} It is the opposite condition to aphantasia, where mental visual imagery is not present.{{cite journal | vauthors = Zeman A, Milton F, Della Sala S, Dewar M, Frayling T, Gaddum J, Hattersley A, Heuerman-Williamson B, Jones K, MacKisack M, Winlove C | display-authors = 6 | title = Phantasia–The psychological significance of lifelong visual imagery vividness extremes | journal = Cortex; A Journal Devoted to the Study of the Nervous System and Behavior | volume = 130 | pages = 426–440 | date = September 2020 | pmid = 32446532 | doi = 10.1016/j.cortex.2020.04.003 | hdl-access = free | hdl = 20.500.11820/1ff69a7f-ca92-4745-8165-26f8ca62d6d4 | s2cid = 218486387 }}{{Citation |last1=Keogh |first1=Rebecca |date=2021 |url=https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/B978012821377300012X |series=Handbook of Clinical Neurology |volume=178 |pages=277–296 |access-date=2023-05-09 |publisher=Elsevier |language=en |doi=10.1016/b978-0-12-821377-3.00012-x |isbn=978-0-12-821377-3 |last2=Pearson |first2=Joel |last3=Zeman |first3=Adam|title=Neurology of Vision and Visual Disorders |chapter=Aphantasia: The science of visual imagery extremes |pmid=33832681 |s2cid=233193117 |url-access=subscription }} The experience of hyperphantasia is more common than aphantasia{{Cite web| vauthors = Maddox L |date=14 November 2019|title=Aphantasia: what it's like to live with no mind's eye|url=https://www.sciencefocus.com/the-human-body/aphantasia-life-with-no-minds-eye/|access-date=2021-03-14|website=BBC Science Focus Magazine|language=en}} and has been described as being "as vivid as real seeing".{{Cite web | vauthors = Zeman A |title=An update on 'extreme imagination' – aphantasia / hyperphantasia | work = The Eye's Mind | publisher = University of Exeter |url=http://sites.exeter.ac.uk/eyesmind/2020/05/04/an-update-on-extreme-imagination-aphantasiahyperphantasia/ | access-date = 13 March 2021 | date = 4 May 2020 }} Hyperphantasia constitutes all five senses within vivid mental imagery, although literature on the subject is dominated by "visual" mental imagery research, with a lack of research on the other four senses.{{cite journal | vauthors = Pearson J | title = The human imagination: the cognitive neuroscience of visual mental imagery | journal = Nature Reviews. Neuroscience | volume = 20 | issue = 10 | pages = 624–634 | date = October 2019 | pmid = 31384033 | doi = 10.1038/s41583-019-0202-9 | s2cid = 199449027 }}
Research into hyperphantasia is most commonly completed by self-report questionnaires, such as the Vividness of Visual Imagery Questionnaire (VVIQ), developed by David Marks in 1973, which evaluates the vividness of an individual's mental imagery out of a score of 80. Individuals scoring from 75 to 80 are deemed hyperphantasics and are estimated to constitute around 2.5% of the population.
Mechanism
There is no reliably specific mental imagery cortical network; the formation of mental imagery involves many regions of the brain, as mental imagery shares many common brain regions with other cognitive functions.{{cite journal | vauthors = Mellet E, Petit L, Mazoyer B, Denis M, Tzourio N | title = Reopening the mental imagery debate: lessons from functional anatomy | journal = NeuroImage | volume = 8 | issue = 2 | pages = 129–139 | date = August 1998 | pmid = 9740756 | doi = 10.1006/nimg.1998.0355 | s2cid = 44704704}} Neurological evidence has shown that in the creation of imagery, neural activity spans prefrontal, parietal, temporal and visual areas.{{cite journal | vauthors = Keogh R, Bergmann J, Pearson J | title = Cortical excitability controls the strength of mental imagery | journal = eLife | volume = 9 | pages = e50232 | date = May 2020 | pmid = 32369016 | pmc = 7200162 | doi = 10.7554/eLife.50232 | doi-access = free }} Within the neuroscience of imagery, it is often split into three primary aspects: the triggering of imagery, its generation/manipulation, and the underlying vividness of the imagery.{{cite journal | vauthors = Kosslyn SM, Ganis G, Thompson WL | title = Neural foundations of imagery | journal = Nature Reviews. Neuroscience | volume = 2 | issue = 9 | pages = 635–642 | date = September 2001 | pmid = 11533731 | doi = 10.1038/35090055 | s2cid = 605234 }}
The mechanism underlying the vividness of imagery which may explain conditions like hyperphantasia is controversial amongst the literature.{{cite journal | vauthors = Milton F, Fulford J, Dance C, Gaddum J, Heuerman-Williamson B, Jones K, Knight KF, MacKisack M, Winlove C, Zeman A | display-authors = 6 | title = Behavioral and Neural Signatures of Visual Imagery Vividness Extremes: Aphantasia versus Hyperphantasia | journal = Cerebral Cortex Communications | volume = 2 | issue = 2 | pages = tgab035 | date = 2021-04-01 | pmid = 34296179 | pmc = 8186241 | doi = 10.1093/texcom/tgab035 }} The current findings of the mechanism of hyperphantasia are related to two regions of the brain: the early visual cortex and the frontal cortex.
Recent research has shown the relationship between the size (surface area) of the early visual cortex (V1-V3), specifically V1 and to a lesser degree V2 (but not V3), negatively predicts imagery strength within individuals.{{cite journal | vauthors = Bergmann J, Genç E, Kohler A, Singer W, Pearson J | title = Smaller Primary Visual Cortex Is Associated with Stronger, but Less Precise Mental Imagery | journal = Cerebral Cortex | volume = 26 | issue = 9 | pages = 3838–3850 | date = September 2016 | pmid = 26286919 | doi = 10.1093/cercor/bhv186 | doi-access = free }} This relationship is evidenced across both clinical and non-clinical populations [see {{section link||Co-morbidity}} below].
In contrast, there is a positive relationship between the surface area of the frontal cortex and visual imagery strength. This aligns with the reciprocal relationship between the size of primary visual cortices and frontal cortices, with a smaller V1 correlating to a larger frontal cortex.{{cite journal | vauthors = Song C, Schwarzkopf DS, Kanai R, Rees G | title = Reciprocal anatomical relationship between primary sensory and prefrontal cortices in the human brain | journal = The Journal of Neuroscience | volume = 31 | issue = 26 | pages = 9472–9480 | date = June 2011 | pmid = 21715612 | pmc = 3202235 | doi = 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0308-11.2011 }} Within the general principle of human cortical organization, there is an anatomical trade-off between primary sensory cortices such as the primary visual cortex and frontal areas. Several lines of evidence suggest that the respective sizes of these areas within individuals predict their vividness of imagery. Additionally, genetics play a part in determining the surface area of V1, suggesting that genetics may indirectly contribute to hyperphantasia.
Beyond the size of these regions, there is evidence that lower resting activity and excitability levels within the primary visual cortex predicts stronger mental imagery and vice versa. This has been confirmed by artificially lowering the excitability of the visual cortex, which subsequently led to increased imagery strength. The relationship between the frontal lobe and the visual cortex form an 'imagery network' where the ratio in size and excitability of these two areas relate to imagery strength amongst individuals.
Neuroimaging studies using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) have additionally demonstrated that hyperphantasics have significantly stronger connectivity between their prefrontal cortices (Brodmann's areas 9, 10, 11 in particular) and their visual cortex in comparison to aphantasics.
The mechanism behind vivid imagery appears to come down to the size and excitability of the visual-occipital network and the frontal areas as well as the strength of connectivity between these brain regions. However, these factors can only explain the variations in mental imagery; the specific mechanisms that cause hyperphantasia are still not well documented.
Impacts
= Memory =
{{See also|Hyperthymesia}}
Vivid mental imagery as observed in hyperphantasia impacts people's ability for "mental time travel", or the ability to remember past events as well as imagine future events.{{cite journal | vauthors = D'Argembeau A, Van der Linden M | title = Individual differences in the phenomenology of mental time travel: The effect of vivid visual imagery and emotion regulation strategies | journal = Consciousness and Cognition | volume = 15 | issue = 2 | pages = 342–350 | date = June 2006 | pmid = 16230028 | doi = 10.1016/j.concog.2005.09.001 | hdl = 2268/2916 | s2cid = 10299410 | hdl-access = free }} Hyperphantasics have reported more sensory details of episodic memories and future event constructions.{{cite journal | vauthors = Greenberg DL, Knowlton BJ | title = The role of visual imagery in autobiographical memory | journal = Memory & Cognition | volume = 42 | issue = 6 | pages = 922–934 | date = August 2014 | pmid = 24554279 | doi = 10.3758/s13421-014-0402-5 | s2cid = 4089873 | url = http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/1bc1921g }}
Episodic and autobiographical memories are reliant on sensory-perceptual data such as visual imagery. Concepts such as "flashbulb memories", which are powerful autobiographical memories that we often relive, are often built on vivid visual snapshots. Evidence has shown that individuals exhibiting increased imagery vividness also often recall autobiographical memories with richer descriptions as well as with more fluency. Additionally, disorders that affect vision and visual imagery such as aphantasia have been linked to autobiographical amnesia, depicting the importance of visual imagery to autobiographical recall. This relationship of imagery vividness and improved autobiographical memory recall is evidenced across both clinical and non-clinical populations.
There is a lack of research on the impacts of vivid mental imagery on imagining future events and possible scenarios (episodic future thinking); however, research has shown that increased vivid imagery will predict the "clarity of spatial context, the feeling of emotions, and the intensity and personal importance of the events". This implies that hyperphantasics may be better at planning for the future and predicting how events may impact them. Additionally, this explains why vivid imagery helps with perceptual acuity. Research has shown that higher VVIQ scores predict rapid and more precise decision-making in the face of a threat.{{cite journal | vauthors = Imbriano G, Sussman TJ, Jin J, Mohanty A | title = The role of imagery in threat-related perceptual decision making | journal = Emotion | volume = 20 | issue = 8 | pages = 1495–1501 | date = December 2020 | pmid = 31192666 | pmc = 6908763 | doi = 10.1037/emo0000610 }}
= Personality =
Hyperphantasia has been shown to be associated with higher levels of "openness" in the Big Five personality traits, using the NEO personality inventory. This entails more openness to "new experiences, broad interests, an active imagination and a likelihood of experiencing positive and negative emotions more keenly than other people".
Co-morbidity
Vivid imagery has been correlated to several mood disorders, particularly anxiety, obsessive–compulsive disorder, major depressive disorder, and bipolar disorder, and having hyperphantasia may exacerbate symptoms of such disorders by subserving ruminating thoughts as well as acting as an "emotional amplifier".{{cite journal | vauthors = O'Donnell C, Di Simplicio M, Brown R, Holmes EA, Burnett Heyes S | title = The role of mental imagery in mood amplification: An investigation across subclinical features of bipolar disorders | journal = Cortex; A Journal Devoted to the Study of the Nervous System and Behavior | volume = 105 | pages = 104–117 | date = August 2018 | pmid = 28912037 | doi = 10.1016/j.cortex.2017.08.010 | s2cid = 2109953 | doi-access = free }} For example, vivid "flash-forwards" to suicidal acts may increase occurrences of suicide.
The vividness of mental imagery has a key role in the development and continuation of intrusive memories, so for those with PTSD, having hyperphantasia is a substantial risk factor.{{cite journal | vauthors = Morina N, Leibold E, Ehring T | title = Vividness of general mental imagery is associated with the occurrence of intrusive memories | journal = Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry | volume = 44 | issue = 2 | pages = 221–226 | date = June 2013 | pmid = 23228560 | doi = 10.1016/j.jbtep.2012.11.004 }} Both schizophrenia and Parkinson's disease also may be aggravated by hyperphantasia, as high levels of vivid imagery predict the severity of visual hallucinations. In fact, it is possible that hyperphantasia is a "trait maker" for schizophrenia, with both disorders being associated with a smaller primary visual cortex. Individuals with schizophrenia have a 25% volume reduction of their primary visual cortex (V1) and its total number of neurons.{{cite journal | vauthors = Dorph-Petersen KA, Pierri JN, Wu Q, Sampson AR, Lewis DA | title = Primary visual cortex volume and total neuron number are reduced in schizophrenia | journal = The Journal of Comparative Neurology | volume = 501 | issue = 2 | pages = 290–301 | date = March 2007 | pmid = 17226750 | doi = 10.1002/cne.21243 | s2cid = 27305379 }}
Additionally, a 2008 study found a connection between hyperphantasia and synesthesia. Sampling a large group of synesthetes, they found that individuals with synesthesia reported more vivid mental images than control groups.{{cite journal | vauthors = Barnett KJ, Newell FN | title = Synaesthesia is associated with enhanced, self-rated visual imagery | journal = Consciousness and Cognition | volume = 17 | issue = 3 | pages = 1032–1039 | date = September 2008 | pmid = 17627844 | doi = 10.1016/j.concog.2007.05.011 | s2cid = 23812834 }}