model-driven engineering

{{Short description|Software development methodology}}

{{more footnotes|date=August 2014}}

{{Software development process}}

Model-driven engineering (MDE) is a software development methodology that focuses on creating and exploiting domain models, which are conceptual models of all the topics related to a specific problem. Hence, it highlights and aims at abstract representations of the knowledge and activities that govern a particular application domain, rather than the computing (i.e. algorithmic) concepts.

MDE is a subfield of a software design approach referred as round-trip engineering. The scope of the MDE is much wider than that of the Model-Driven Architecture.{{Cite web |title=8 Reasons Why Model-Driven Approaches (will) Fail |url=https://www.infoq.com/articles/8-reasons-why-MDE-fails/ |access-date=2023-07-26 |website=InfoQ |language=en}}

Overview

The MDE approach is meant to increase productivity by maximizing compatibility between systems (via reuse of standardized models), simplifying the process of design (via models of recurring design patterns in the application domain), and promoting communication between individuals and teams working on the system (via a standardization of the terminology and the best practices used in the application domain). For instance, in model-driven development, technical artifacts such as source code, documentation, tests, and more are generated algorithmically from a domain model.{{Cite book |last=Flatt |first=Amelie |title=Model-Driven Development of Akoma Ntoso Application Profiles - A Conceptual Framework for Model-Based Generation of XML Subschemas |last2=Langner |first2=Arne |last3=Leps |first3=Olof |publisher=Sprinter Nature |year=2022 |isbn=978-3-031-14131-7 |edition=1st |location=Heidelberg |language=en}}

A modeling paradigm for MDE is considered effective if its models make sense from the point of view of a user that is familiar with the domain, and if they can serve as a basis for implementing systems. The models are developed through extensive communication among product managers, designers, developers and users of the application domain. As the models approach completion, they enable the development of software and systems.

Some of the better known MDE initiatives are:

  • The Object Management Group (OMG) initiative Model-Driven Architecture (MDA) which is leveraged by several of their standards such as Meta-Object Facility, XMI, CWM, CORBA, Unified Modeling Language (to be more precise, the OMG currently promotes the use of a subset of UML called fUML together with its action language, ALF, for model-driven architecture; a former approach relied on Executable UML and OCL, instead), and QVT.{{cite web|author=Object Management Group|author-link=Object Management Group|title=OMG Trademarks|url=https://www.omg.org/legal/tm_list.htm|access-date=2008-02-26|date=2006-05-24}}
  • The Eclipse "eco-system" of programming and modelling tools represented in general terms by the (Eclipse Modeling Framework). This framework allows the creation of tools implementing the MDA standards of the OMG; but, it is also possible to use it to implement other modeling-related tools.

History

File:Métamodèle, modèle et original.pngThe first tools to support MDE were the Computer-Aided Software Engineering (CASE) tools developed in the 1980s. Companies like Integrated Development Environments (IDE – StP), Higher Order Software (now Hamilton Technologies, Inc., HTI), Cadre Technologies, Bachman Information Systems, and Logic Works (BP-Win and ER-Win) were pioneers in the field.

The US government got involved in the modeling definitions creating the IDEF specifications. With several variations of the modeling definitions (see Booch, Rumbaugh, Jacobson, Gane and Sarson, Harel, Shlaer and Mellor, and others) they were eventually joined creating the Unified Modeling Language (UML). Rational Rose, a product for UML implementation, was done by Rational Corporation (Booch) responding automation yield higher levels of abstraction in software development. This abstraction promotes simpler models with a greater focus on problem space. Combined with executable semantics this elevates the total level of automation possible. The Object Management Group (OMG) has developed a set of standards called Model-Driven Architecture (MDA), building a foundation for this advanced architecture-focused approach.

Advantages

According to Douglas C. Schmidt, model-driven engineering technologies offer a promising approach to address the inability of third-generation languages to alleviate the complexity of platforms and express domain concepts effectively.{{cite journal|last=Schmidt|first=D.C.|title=Model-Driven Engineering|journal=IEEE Computer|volume=39|issue=2|date=February 2006|doi=10.1109/MC.2006.58|s2cid=10006139|url=https://www.cs.wustl.edu/~schmidt/PDF/GEI.pdf|access-date=2006-05-16|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060909034327/http://www.cs.wustl.edu/%7Eschmidt/PDF/GEI.pdf|archive-date=2006-09-09|url-status=dead}}, "A promising approach to address platform complexity—and the inability of third-generation languages to alleviate this complexity and express domain concepts effectively—is to develop Model-Driven Engineering (MDE) technologies..."

Tools

Notable software tools for model-driven engineering include:

{{div col|colwidth=27em}}

{{div col end}}

See also

References

{{Reflist}}

Further reading

  • David S. Frankel, Model Driven Architecture: Applying MDA to Enterprise Computing, John Wiley & Sons, {{ISBN|0-471-31920-1}}
  • Marco Brambilla, Jordi Cabot, Manuel Wimmer, Model Driven Software Engineering in Practice, foreword by Richard Soley (OMG Chairman), Morgan & Claypool, USA, 2012, Synthesis Lectures on Software Engineering #1. 182 pages. {{ISBN|9781608458820}} (paperback), {{ISBN|9781608458837}} (ebook). https://www.mdse-book.com
  • {{cite journal|first=Alberto Rodrigues |last=da Silva |title=Model-Driven Engineering: A Survey Supported by a Unified Conceptual Model |journal=Computer Languages, Systems & Structures |volume=43 |pages=139–155 |number=43 |date=2015|doi=10.1016/j.cl.2015.06.001 |doi-access=free }}