moment of inertia factor
{{Short description|Distribution of mass in a celestial body}}
In planetary sciences, the moment of inertia factor or normalized polar moment of inertia is a dimensionless quantity that characterizes the radial distribution of mass inside a planet or satellite. Since a moment of inertia has dimensions of mass times length squared, the moment of inertia factor is the coefficient that multiplies these.
Definition
For a planetary body with principal moments of inertia
:,
where C is the first principal moment of inertia of the body, M is the mass of the body, and R is the mean radius of the body. For a sphere with uniform density, .{{refn |For a sphere with uniform density we can calculate the moment of inertia and the mass by integrating over disks from the "south pole" to the "north pole". Using a density of 1, a disk of radius {{mvar|r}} has a moment of inertia of
:
whereas the mass is
:
Letting and integrating over we get:
:
\frac C{R^5}&=\frac\pi 2\int_{-1}^1\cos^4\theta\ d\sin\theta\\
& = \frac\pi 2\int_{-1}^1(1-\sin^2\theta)^2\ d\sin\theta\\
& = \frac\pi 2\int_{-1}^1(1-2\sin^2\theta+\sin^4\theta)d\sin\theta\\
& = \frac\pi 2\int_{-1}^1(d\sin\theta-\frac 23d\sin^3\theta+\frac 15d\sin^5\theta)\\
& = \frac 8{15}\pi
\end{align}
:
\frac M{R^3}&=\pi\int_{-1}^1\cos^2\theta\ d\sin\theta\\
& = \pi\int_{-1}^1(1-\sin^2\theta)d\sin\theta\\
& = \pi\int_{-1}^1(d\sin\theta-\frac 13d\sin^3\theta)\\
& = \frac 43\pi
\end{align}
This gives .|group = note}}{{refn |For several other examples (in which the rotation axis is the axis of symmetry if not otherwise specified), a solid cone has a factor of 3/10; a uniform thin rod (rotating about its center perpendicularly to its axis, so R is length/2) has a factor of 1/3; a hollow cone or a solid cylinder has a factor of 1/2; a hollow sphere has factor of 2/3; a hollow open-ended cylinder has a factor of 1.| group = note}} For a differentiated planet or satellite, where there is an increase of density with depth, . The quantity is a useful indicator of the presence and extent of a planetary core, because a greater departure from the uniform-density value of 2/5 conveys a greater degree of concentration of dense materials towards the center.
Solar System values
The Sun has by far the lowest moment of inertia factor value among Solar System bodies; it has by far the highest central density ({{val|162|u=g/cm3}},{{refn |A star's central density tends to increase over the course of its lifetime, aside from during brief core nuclear fusion ignition events like the helium flash.| group = note}} compared to ~13 for Earth{{cite web |last1=Robertson |first1=Eugene C. |date=26 July 2001 |url=http://pubs.usgs.gov/gip/interior/ |title=The Interior of the Earth |publisher=USGS |accessdate=24 March 2007}}{{cite book|author1=Hazlett, James S. |author2=Monroe, Reed |author3=Wicander, Richard |title=Physical geology : exploring the earth|year= 2006|publisher= Thomson|location= Belmont|isbn= 9780495011484|page= 346|edition= 6.}}) and a relatively low average density (1.41 g/cm3 versus 5.5 for Earth). Saturn has the lowest value among the gas giants in part because it has the lowest bulk density ({{val|0.687|u=g/cm3}}).{{cite web |url=http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/planetary/factsheet/saturnfact.html |title=Saturn Fact Sheet |publisher=NASA |last=Williams |first=David R. |accessdate=31 July 2007 |date=7 September 2006 |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20140414074059/http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/planetary/factsheet/saturnfact.html |archivedate=14 April 2014 |url-status=live}} Ganymede has the lowest moment of inertia factor among solid bodies in the Solar System because of its fully differentiated interior,{{cite journal |last1=Showman |first1=Adam P. |last2=Malhotra |first2=Renu |title=The Galilean Satellites |date=1999-10-01 |journal=Science |volume=286 |pages=77–84 |doi=10.1126/science.286.5437.77 |url=http://www.lpl.arizona.edu/~showman/publications/showman-malhotra-1999.pdf |pmid=10506564 |issue=5437 }}{{cite journal |last1=Sohl |first1=F. |last2=Spohn |first2=T |last3=Breuer |first3=D. |last4=Nagel |first4=K. |title=Implications from Galileo Observations on the Interior Structure and Chemistry of the Galilean Satellites |journal=Icarus |date=2002 |volume=157 |issue=1 |pages=104–119 |doi=10.1006/icar.2002.6828 |bibcode=2002Icar..157..104S }} a result in part of tidal heating due to the Laplace resonance,{{cite journal |last1=Showman |first1=Adam P. |last2=Stevenson |first2=David J. |last3=Malhotra |first3=Renu |title=Coupled Orbital and Thermal Evolution of Ganymede |journal=Icarus |date=1997 |volume=129 |issue=2 |pages=367–383 |doi=10.1006/icar.1997.5778 |url=http://www.lpl.arizona.edu/~showman/publications/showman-etal-1997.pdf |bibcode=1997Icar..129..367S }} as well as its substantial component of low density water ice. Callisto is similar in size and bulk composition to Ganymede, but is not part of the orbital resonance and is less differentiated. The Moon is thought to have a small core, but its interior is otherwise relatively homogenous.{{cite web |last1= Brown| first1= D.| last2= Anderson|first2= J.|website= NASA|url= http://www.nasa.gov/topics/moonmars/features/lunar_core.html |title= NASA Research Team Reveals Moon Has Earth-Like Core |publisher=NASA |date= 6 January 2011}}{{cite journal|last1= Weber|first1= R. C.|last2= Lin|first2= P.-Y.|last3= Garnero|first3= E. J.|last4= Williams|first4= Q.|last5= Lognonne|first5= P.|title= Seismic Detection of the Lunar Core|journal= Science|volume= 331|issue= 6015|date= 2011-01-21|pages= 309–312|url= http://www.earth.northwestern.edu/people/seth/351/lunarcore.2011.pdf|doi= 10.1126/science.1199375|pmid= 21212323|bibcode= 2011Sci...331..309W|s2cid= 206530647|access-date= 2017-04-10|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20151015035756/http://www.earth.northwestern.edu/people/seth/351/lunarcore.2011.pdf|archive-date= 2015-10-15|url-status= dead}}
class="wikitable sortable" | |||
width="40" |Body
! width="120" |Value ! class=unsortable|Source ! class=unsortable|Notes | |||
---|---|---|---|
{{hs|00}} Sun | {{hs|0070}} 0.070 | Not measured | |
{{hs|01}} Mercury | {{hs|0346}} 0.346 ± 0.014 | ||
{{hs|02}} Venus | {{hs|0338}} 0.337 ± 0.024 | {{Cite journal|last1=Margot|first1=Jean-Luc|last2=Campbell|first2=Donald B.|last3=Giorgini|first3=Jon D.|last4=Jao|first4=Joseph S.|last5=Snedeker|first5=Lawrence G.|last6=Ghigo|first6=Frank D.|last7=Bonsall|first7=Amber|date=2021-04-29|title=Spin state and moment of inertia of Venus|url=https://www.nature.com/articles/s41550-021-01339-7|journal=Nature Astronomy|volume=5|issue=7|language=en|pages=676–683|doi=10.1038/s41550-021-01339-7|issn=2397-3366|arxiv=2103.01504|bibcode=2021NatAs...5..676M|s2cid=232092194}} | |
{{hs|03}} Earth | {{hs|0331}} 0.3307 | ||
{{hs|04}} Moon | {{hs|0393}} 0.3929 ± 0.0009 | ||
{{hs|05}} Mars | {{hs|0364}} 0.3644 ± 0.0005 | ||
{{hs|06}} Ceres | {{hs|0360}} 0.36 ± 0.15{{refn |The value given for Ceres is the mean moment of inertia, which is thought to better represent its interior structure than the polar moment of inertia, due to its high polar flattening.| group = note}} | Not measured (range reflects different assumptions for original spin rate) | |
{{hs|07}} Jupiter | {{hs|0276}} 0.2756 ± 0.0006 | Not measured (two-layer model calculations constrained by Juno gravity data) | |
{{hs|08}} Io | {{hs|0378}} 0.37824 ± 0.00022 | Not measured (Darwin-Radau relation) | |
{{hs|09}} Europa | {{hs|0346}} 0.346 ± 0.005 | Not measured (Darwin-Radau relation) | |
{{hs|10}} Ganymede | {{hs|0311}} 0.3115 ± 0.0028 | Not measured (Darwin-Radau relation) | |
{{hs|11}} Callisto | {{hs|0355}} 0.3549 ± 0.0042 | Not measured (Darwin-Radau relation) | |
{{hs|12}} Saturn | {{hs|0220}} 0.22 | Not measured (Darwin-Radau relation) | |
{{hs|13}} Enceladus | {{hs|0330}} 0.3305 ± 0.0025 | Not measured (Darwin-Radau relation) | |
{{hs|13}} Rhea | {{hs|0391}} 0.3911 ± 0.0045 | Not measured (Darwin-Radau relation) | |
{{hs|13}} Titan | {{hs|0341}} 0.341 | Not measured (Darwin-Radau relation) | |
{{hs|14}} Uranus | {{hs|0230}} 0.23 | Not measured (approximate solution to Clairaut's equation) | |
{{hs|15}} Neptune | {{hs|0230}} 0.23 | Not measured (approximate solution to Clairaut's equation) |
Measurement
The polar moment of inertia is traditionally determined by combining measurements of spin quantities (spin precession rate and/or obliquity) with gravity quantities (coefficients of a spherical harmonic representation of the gravity field). These geodetic data usually require an orbiting spacecraft to collect.
Approximation
For bodies in hydrostatic equilibrium, the Darwin–Radau relation can provide estimates of the moment of inertia factor on the basis of shape, spin, and gravity quantities.
Role in interior models
The moment of inertia factor provides an important constraint for models representing the interior structure of a planet or satellite. At a minimum, acceptable models of the density profile must match the volumetric mass density and moment of inertia factor of the body.
Gallery of internal structure models
Notes
{{reflist
| group = note
}}
References
{{reflist
|refs=
{{cite book|last2=Lissauer|first2=Jack J.|last1=de Pater|first1=Imke|title=Planetary sciences|date=2015|url= https://books.google.com/books?id=stFpBgAAQBAJ&pg=PA250|publisher=Cambridge University Press|location=New York|isbn= 978-0521853712|edition=2nd updated|oclc= 903194732}}
{{cite web | url = http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/planetary/factsheet/sunfact.html | title = Sun Fact Sheet | last = Williams | first = D. R. | date = | website = Planetary Fact Sheets | publisher = NASA | access-date = 2017-01-26}}
}}