nanobe

{{Short description|Rock and sediment microstructure}}{{use dmy dates|date=July 2023}}

File:ALH84001 structures.jpg are similar to the structures found in nanobes]]

{{distinguish|Nanobacteria|Ultramicrobacteria}}

A nanobe ({{IPAc-en|ˈ|n|æ|n|oʊ|b|,_|ˈ|n|eɪ|n|oʊ|b}}){{cite dictionary |title=nanobe |dictionary=Lexico U.S. English Dictionary |publisher=Oxford University Press |url=http://www.lexico.com/en/definition/nanobe |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190731214907/https://www.lexico.com/en/definition/nanobe |archive-date=July 31, 2019}} is a tiny filamental structure first found in some rocks and sediments. Some scientists hypothesize that nanobes are the smallest form of life, {{sfrac|1| 10 }} the size of the smallest known bacteria.{{cite journal | last = Nanjundiah | first = V. | year = 2000 | title = The smallest form of life yet? | journal = Journal of Biosciences | volume = 25 | issue = 1 | pages = 9–10 | url = http://eprints.iisc.ernet.in/archive/00001799/01/25smallest25(1)-9to10mar2000.pdf | doi = 10.1007/BF02985175 | pmid = 10824192 | s2cid = 29030837 }}

No conclusive evidence exists that these structures are, or are not, living organisms, so their classification is controversial.

The 1996 discovery of nanobes was published in 1998{{cite journal |author1=Uwins, Philippa J.R. |display-authors=etal |year=1998 |title=Novel nano-organisms from Australian sandstones |journal=American Mineralogist | volume=83 |issue=11-12 |pages=1541–1550, Part 2 |doi=10.2138/am-1998-11-1242

|bibcode=1998AmMin..83.1541U |url=http://www.microscopy-uk.org.uk/nanobes/nanobes.pdf }} by Uwins et al.,{{cite news |title=Nanobes: About Philippa Uwins and the discovery team |website=microscopy-uk.org.uk |url=http://www.microscopy-uk.org.uk/nanobes/nanophil.html }} from the University of Queensland, Australia. They were found growing from rock samples (both full-diameter and sidewall cores) of Jurassic and Triassic sandstones, originally retrieved from an unspecified number of oil exploration wells off Australia's west coast. Depths of retrieval were between {{convert|3400|m|mi|1}} and {{convert|5100|m|mi|1}} below the sea bed. While Uwins et al. present assertions against it, they do not exclude the possibility that the nanobes are from a surface contaminant, not from the rock units cited.

The smallest are just 20 nanometers in diameter. Some researchers believe that these structures are crystal growths, but the staining of these structures with dyes that bind to DNA might indicate that they are living organisms.{{cite web |title=Nanobacteria and nanobes – Are they alive? |website=Carlton.edu |series=Science Education Resource Center |publisher=Carlton College |place=Northfield, MN |url=http://serc.carleton.edu/microbelife/topics/nanobes/index.html}}

They are similar to the structures found in ALH84001, a Mars meteorite found in the Antarctic. A 2022 study concluded that ALH84001 did not contain Martian life; the discovered organic molecules were found to be associated with abiotic processes (ie, "serpentinization and carbonation reactions that occurred during the aqueous alteration of basalt rock by hydrothermal fluids") produced on the very early Mars four billion years ago instead.{{cite news |last=Dunn |first=Marcia |date=13 January 2022 |title=Study nixes Mars life in meteorite found in Antarctica |agency=Associated Press |website=apnews.com |url=https://apnews.com/article/space-exploration-science-business-planets-mars-33dc55ce0ebced0b65322b03ae06feda |access-date=13 January 2022}}{{cite journal |author=Steele, A. |display-authors=et al. |title=Organic synthesis associated with serpentinization and carbonation on early Mars |date=13 January 2022 |journal=Science |volume=375 |issue=6577 |pages=172–177 |doi=10.1126/science.abg7905 |pmid=35025630 |bibcode=2022Sci...375..172S |s2cid=245933224 }}

Nanobes are similar in size to nanobacteria, which are also structures that had been proposed to be extremely small living organisms. However, these two should not be confused: Nanobacteria were thought to be cellular organisms, while nanobes are hypothesized (by some) to be a previously unknown form of life or protocells.{{Citation needed|date=March 2014}}

Claims

  • It is a living organism (contains DNA or some analogue, and reproduces).
  • Has a morphology similar to Actinomycetes and fungi.
  • Nanobes are about 20 nm in diameter, which may be too small to contain the basic elements for an organism to exist (DNA, ribosomes, etc.), suggesting that if they grow and reproduce they would need to do so in an unconventional way.
  • The Martian meteorite ALH84001, discovered in 1984 in the Antarctic, contained similar tubular structures which some astrobiologists suggested could be evidence of life at an earlier time on Mars.{{cite journal |author=McSween, H. Y. |title=Evidence for life in a martian meteorite? |journal=GSA Today |volume=7 |issue=7 |pages=1–7 |year=1997 |pmid=11541665}}

Responses

A review in Microbes and Environments{{cite journal | author = Velimirov, B. | year = 2001 | title = Nanobacteria, Ultramicrobacteria and Starvation Forms: A Search for the Smallest Metabolizing Bacterium | journal = Microbes and Environments | volume = 16 | issue = 2 | pages = 67–77 | doi = 10.1264/jsme2.2001.67 | doi-access = free | url = https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jsme2/16/2/16_2_67/_pdf | access-date = 2008-06-23 }} of the various ultra-small forms of proposed life states that the main criticism of nanobes is that they appear too small to contain the biochemical machinery needed to sustain life. The review also states that there is no evidence that nanobes are organisms in themselves and not fragments of larger organisms.

Tony Taylor was one of the authors of the original nanobe paper. He argues that the conspicuous lack of phosphorus in the X-ray spectroscopy data and the failure to find DNA using various DNA amplification techniques demonstrates that nanobes do not have any DNA or RNA. He also argues that they may have a completely different mechanism for heredity, which would account for many of their unusual chemical and physical properties.

Size scale context

::

+ {{big|Sizes of micro-organisms and infectious agents}}

! Agent !! Description !! Size
(nm)

Pithoviruslargest known virusalign=right| 1,500 nm
Pandoravirus one of the largest known virusesalign=right| 1,000 nm
Nanoarchaeum smallest known archaeumalign=right|  400 nm
Mycoplasmasmallest known bacteriumalign=right| 300 nm
Nanobacteriaformer proposed class of lifeforms smaller than bacteriaalign=right| {{nobr|< 200 nm}}
Parvovirussmallest known virusesalign=right| 18–28 nm
Nanobeshypothetical lifeforms smaller than virusesalign=right| ≈20 nm
Prionsmallest known infectious agent (protein)align=right| ≈10 nm

See also

References

{{reflist|25em}}