padrino system
{{Short description|Filipino cultural trait}}
{{Use Philippine English|date=January 2021}}
{{Use mdy dates|date=January 2021}}
{{More citations needed|date=October 2012}}
The padrino system, or patronage in Filipino culture and politics, is a value system in which individuals gain favor, promotion, or political appointment through family affiliation (nepotism) or friendship (cronyism), rather than on the basis of merit. The system traces its origins to the Spanish colonial period, when Filipinos were often required to obtain the favor of a Spanish official or a wealthy Filipino, typically a friar, in order to secure a government position or improve their social or economic standing.{{cite book |last1=Sriwarakuel |first1=Warayuth |title=Cultural Traditions and Contemporary Challenges in Southeast Asia: Hindu and Buddhist |date=2005 |publisher=The Council for Research in Values and Philosophy |isbn=978-1-56518-213-4 |page=[https://books.google.com/books?id=BnxpmvgAwcQC&pg=PA294 294] |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=BnxpmvgAwcQC |access-date=March 18, 2023}} At the center of this system is the padrino, a sponsor or influential backer who uses their power or connections to secure opportunities for others. The padrino system has also been a source of numerous controversies and is widely associated with corruption.{{Cite journal |last=Agaton |first=Sheldon Ives Go |title=The Padrino System in Philippine Politics and Society |journal=Social Ethics Society Journal of Applied Philosophy |volume=Special Issue |pages=193–209 |date=February 2024 |url=https://ses-journal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/SES-Journal_Special-Issue_Feb-2024_Article-8_final.pdf}}
In the executive
In the executive branch, the padrino system can be observed in the appointment of officials, where loyalty to the president's political party, supporters, or campaign contributors often plays a significant role. This practice has raised concerns about its impact on meritocracy and the professionalism of the civil service.{{Cite book |last=Villamejor-Mendoza |first=Maria Fe |title=Patronage Appointments in the Philippine Public Service |chapter=Chapter 9 |editor-last=Peters |editor-first=B. Guy |editor2-last=Knox |editor2-first=Colin |editor3-last=Kim |editor3-first=Byeong Seob |publisher=Cambridge University Press |date=October 5, 2023 |url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/political-patronage-in-asian-bureaucracies/patronage-appointments-in-the-philippine-public-service/E85045435F0204F1704CACD2193BEEEF}}
In the legislative
The Constitution of the Philippines, in many ways, laid down the foundations against nepotism, cronyism, and oligarchical rule of the few.
The issue of political dynasties has always been touched, especially during elections, but the subject has been much avoided by politicians alike who have a wife, son, daughter, or a relative sitting in office as well.
When the pork barrel scam broke out, Senator Jinggoy Estrada claimed that Pres. Benigno Aquino III used the Disbursement Acceleration Program to influence the 188 Congressional Representatives and 20 Senators to approve the impeachment complaint against Renato Corona. On July 2, 2014, the Supreme Court decision on DAP was ruled as unconstitutional.
In the military
The Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP) was known as one of the best in the post-World War geopolitical scene in Southeast Asia, if not the whole of Asia. The majority of the officers were graduates from the West Point-styled Philippine Military Academy.
In order to get a higher rank or office, one must have at least known or befriended a high-ranking official to be promoted.{{citation needed|date=November 2020}}
In society
= Efforts to combat the padrino system =
In September 2008, Senator Miriam Defensor-Santiago passed Senate Bill No. 2616, or the "Anti-Political Recommendation Act", however this as usual has been shelved for the time being and is currently pending at the Committee level.{{Cite web |title=Bills/Resolutions - Senate of the Philippines |url=http://legacy.senate.gov.ph/lis/bill_res.aspx |access-date=January 22, 2021 |website=legacy.senate.gov.ph}} She once again urged its passage in 2013, in response to accounts of the so-called "three kings" of the Bureau of Customs being supported by influential backers – Carlos So (backed by Iglesia ni Cristo), Rogel Gatchalian (claimed to be an associate of then-Senate Minority Leader Juan Ponce Enrile), and Ricardo Belmonte (then-House Speaker Feliciano Belmonte Jr.'s soon-to-retire brother) – during that year.{{cite news|title=Bill aims to stop 'padrino' setup |url=https://newsinfo.inquirer.net/458513/santiago-files-bill-to-stop-padrino-system-in-govt-appointments |last1=Yamsuan |first1=Cathy |date=August 5, 2013 |access-date=January 22, 2021 |work=Philippine Daily Inquirer}}
Senatorial candidate Diosdado Valeroso, a former police chief superintendent, in Rappler's senatorial debate on April 22, 2016, proposed a meritocracy bill that would shield law enforcement agencies and government employees from political influence, most especially from the padrino system.{{cite news|url=https://www.rappler.com/nation/elections/diosdado-valeroso-meritocracy-bill-vs-padrino-system |title=Valeroso pushes for meritocracy bill vs padrino system |last1=Francisco |first1=Katerina |date=April 22, 2016 |access-date=January 22, 2021 |work=Rappler}}
See also
- Corruption in the Philippines
- Spoils system, 19th century American equivalent