post-merger integration
{{Use American English|date=February 2023}}
{{Multiple issues|
{{Advert|article use of references leads to impression that the article is being used as vehicle for promotion|date=May 2019}}
{{Refimprove|date=May 2019}}}}
Post-merger integration or PMI is the process of combining and rearranging businesses to materialize potential efficiencies and synergies that usually motivate mergers and acquisitions. The PMI is a critical aspect of mergers; it involves combining the original logistical-socio-technical systems of the merging organizations into one newly combined system.
Overview
The process of combining two or more organizations into a single organization involves several organizational systems, such as assets, people, resources, tasks, and the supporting information technology.{{cite book|title= The human side of mergers and acquisitions: Managing collisions between people, cultures, and organizations|last= Anthony F.|first= Buono|author2= Bowditch, James L.|year= 1989|publisher= Jossey-Bass Publishers|location= San Francisco|isbn= 1-55542-135-0|url-access= registration|url= https://archive.org/details/humansideofmerge00buon}}{{pages needed|date=June 2019}} The process of combining these systems is known as 'integration'. Integration Planning is one of the most challenging areas to address pre-close during a merger or acquisition. Even though culture clash between companies can cause integration problems, only 4% of the executives in a survey by Pritchett, LP reported that their organizations include culture-specific questions in their due diligence checklists.{{cite web|url=https://www.mergerintegration.com/corporate-culture-x-factor-merger-success-and-failure|title=Corporate Culture: The "X Factor" in Merger Success and Failure|website=Mergerintegration.com|access-date=26 June 2019}} Culture-specific due diligence may include cultural screening and creating a cultural profile of the target firm. GE Capital conducts a cultural assessment of prospective candidates against metrics such as trust in existing managers, language barriers, and operating processes to then facilitate a culture work out session between both sides.{{cite journal |last1= Lee Marks|first1= Mitchell |last2= H. Mirvis|first2= Philip |date= December 2011 |title= A framework for the human resource role in managing culture in Mergers and Acquisitions |journal= Human Resource Management |volume= 50 |issue= 6|pages= 859–877|doi= 10.1002/hrm.20445}}
An example of a typical structure for an integration consists of three layers: a steering committee, an integration management office (led by an integration manager) and a variety of additional teams organized by function (i.e. sales, human resources, finance, and information technology, etc.) and/or by business unit, product line, process, or geographic location.{{cite web|url=https://www.mergerintegration.com/strategy-planning/post-merger-integration-plan-merging-businesses|title=The 5 Critical Elements of an M&A Integration Plan|website=Mergerintegration.com|access-date=26 June 2019}}
More communication to employees is usually necessary during post merger integrations than during day-to-day operations.{{cite web|url=https://www.mergerintegration.com/post-merger-management/merging-companies-reasons-employee-communication|title=Top 10 Reasons Why More Employee Communication Is Necessary When Merging Companies|website=Mergerintegration.com|access-date=26 June 2019}} Fortunately, many of the questions from employees can be anticipated.{{cite web|url=https://www.mergerintegration.com/post-merger-management/planning-mergers-questions-employees-customers-media|title=M&A Common Questions from Employees, Customers, and Media|website=Mergerintegration.com|access-date=26 June 2019}}
Achieving successes early in an integration can help build confidence in a deal and quiet skeptics.{{cite web|url=https://www.mergerintegration.com/engineer-early-success-your-merger|title=Engineer Early Success in Your Merger|website=Mergerintegration.com|access-date=26 June 2019}}
Common problems that may be encountered during post merger integrations include resistance to change, divided loyalties, issues with employee trust in leaders, blurred roles and responsibilities, unclear reporting relationships, communication tangles, job insecurity, unusual employee turnover, and infighting. {{Cite book|url=https://www.mergerintegration.com/sites/default/files/Smart-Moves_0.pdf|title=Smart Moves: A Crash Course on Merger Integration Management|last1=Price|first1=Pritchett|last2=Pound|first2=Ron|publisher=Pritchett, LP|year=2018|isbn=978-0944002032|location=Dallas, Texas|pages=8}}{{cite journal |doi=10.1016/j.leaqua.2019.101365 |title=Merger-specific trust cues in the development of trust in new supervisors during an organizational merger: A naturally occurring quasi-experiment |year=2020 |last1=Lipponen |first1=Jukka |last2=Kaltiainen |first2=Janne |last3=Van Der Werff |first3=Lisa |last4=Steffens |first4=Niklas K. |journal=The Leadership Quarterly |volume=31 |issue=4 |page=101365 |s2cid=212957211 |doi-access=free |hdl=10138/318274 |hdl-access=free }}
Organizational lifecycle
{{refimprove|section|date=May 2019}}
Integration fits within an organizational lifecycle or specific business mergers and acquisitions cycle where businesses buy, integrate, then dispose of businesses:
- Definition of vision & strategy
- Selection of growth method: organic vs inorganic
- Target identification
- Pre-deal evaluation & due diligence
- Negotiation & deal completion
- Post-merger integration
- Acquisition integration
- Ongoing improvement
- Disposal
See also
References
{{Reflist}}
{{corporate finance and investment banking}}
{{DEFAULTSORT:Merger Integration}}