pseudogroup

A pseudogroup imposes several conditions on sets of homeomorphisms (respectively, diffeomorphisms) defined on open sets {{math|U}} of a given Euclidean space or more generally of a fixed topological space (respectively, smooth manifold). Since two homeomorphisms {{math|h : U → V}} and {{math|g : V → W}} compose to a homeomorphism from {{math|U}} to {{math|W}}, one asks that the pseudogroup is closed under composition and inversion. However, unlike those for a group, the axioms defining a pseudogroup are not purely algebraic; the further requirements are related to the possibility of restricting and of patching homeomorphisms (similar to the gluing axiom for sections of a sheaf).

More precisely, a pseudogroup on a topological space {{math|S}} is a collection {{math|Γ}} of homeomorphisms between open subsets of {{math|S}} satisfying the following properties:{{cite book|last1=Kobayashi|first1= Shoshichi |last2= Nomizu|first2=Katsumi|title=Foundations of Differential Geometry, Volume I|series= Wiley Classics Library|publisher=John Wiley & Sons Inc.|location= New York|year= 1963|pages=1–2|isbn=0470496487}}{{cite book |mr=1435975 |last=Thurston |first= William P. |author-link=William Thurston |title=Three-dimensional geometry and topology |editor=Silvio Levy |series=Princeton Mathematical Series |volume=35 |publisher=Princeton University Press |year=1997 |doi=10.1515/9781400865321 |isbn=0-691-08304-5 |url=https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/9781400865321/html?lang=en }}

1. The domains of the elements {{math|g}} in {{math|Γ}} cover {{math|S}} ("cover").
2. The restriction of an element {{math|g}} in {{math|Γ}} to any open set contained in its domain is also in {{math|Γ}} ("restriction").
3. The composition {{math|g ∘ h}} of two elements of {{math|Γ}}, when defined, is in {{math|Γ}} ("composition").
4. The inverse of an element of {{math|g}} is in {{math|Γ}} ("inverse").
5. The property of lying in {{math|Γ}} is local, i.e. if {{math|g : U → V}} is a homeomorphism between open sets of {{math|S}} and {{math|U}} is covered by open sets {{math|U_i}} with {{math|g}} restricted to {{math|U_i}} lying in {{math|Γ}} for each {{math|i}}, then {{math|g}} also lies in {{math|Γ}} ("local").

As a consequence the identity homeomorphism of any open subset of {{math|S}} lies in {{math|Γ}}.

Similarly, a pseudogroup on a smooth manifold {{math|X}} is defined as a collection {{math|Γ}} of diffeomorphisms between open subsets of {{math|X}} satisfying analogous properties (where we replace homeomorphisms with diffeomorphisms).{{cite book |first1=Lynn |last1=Loomis |author1-link=Lynn Loomis |first2=Shlomo |last2=Sternberg |author2-link=Shlomo Sternberg |title=Advanced Calculus |edition=Revised |year=2014 |publisher=World Scientific |isbn=978-981-4583-93-0 |mr=3222280 |chapter=Differentiable manifolds |pages=364–372 }}

Two points in {{math|X}} are said to be in the same orbit if an element of {{math|Γ}} sends one to the other. Orbits of a pseudogroup clearly form a partition of {{math|X}}; a pseudogroup is called transitive if it has only one orbit.

A widespread class of examples is given by pseudogroups preserving a given geometric structure. For instance, if {{math|(X, g)}} is a Riemannian manifold, one has the pseudogroup of its local isometries; if {{math|(X, ω)}} is a symplectic manifold, one has the pseudogroup of its local symplectomorphisms; etc. These pseudogroups should be thought as the set of the local symmetries of these structures.

Manifolds with additional structures can often be defined using the pseudogroups of symmetries of a fixed local model. More precisely, given a pseudogroup {{math|Γ}}, a Atlas (topology) on a topological space {{math|S}} consists of a standard atlas on {{math|S}} such that the changes of coordinates (i.e. the transition maps) belong to {{math|Γ}}. An equivalent class of Γ-atlases is also called a {{math|Γ}}-structure on {{math|S}}.

In particular, when {{math|Γ}} is the pseudogroup of all locally defined diffeomorphisms of {{math|Rⁿ}}, one recovers the standard notion of a smooth atlas and a smooth structure. More generally, one can define the following objects as {{math|Γ}}-structures on a topological space {{math|S}}:

• flat Riemannian structures, for {{math|Γ}} pseudogroups of isometries of {{math|Rⁿ}} with the canonical Euclidean metric;
• symplectic structures, for {{math|Γ}} the pseudogroup of symplectomorphisms of {{math|R²ⁿ}} with the canonical symplectic form;
• analytic structures, for {{math|Γ}} the pseudogroup of (real-)analytic diffeomorphisms of {{math|Rⁿ}};
• Riemann surfaces, for {{math|Γ}} the pseudogroup of invertible holomorphic functions of a complex variable.

More generally, any integrable G-structure on a manifold and any (G,X)-manifold are special cases of {{math|Γ}}-structures, for suitable pseudogroups {{math|Γ}}.

In general, pseudogroups were studied as a possible theory of infinite-dimensional Lie groups. The concept of a local Lie group, namely a pseudogroup of functions defined in neighbourhoods of the origin of a Euclidean space {{math|E}}, is actually closer to Lie's original concept of Lie group, in the case where the transformations involved depend on a finite number of parameters, than the contemporary definition via manifolds. One of Cartan's achievements was to clarify the points involved, including the point that a local Lie group always gives rise to a global group, in the current sense (an analogue of Lie's third theorem, on Lie algebras determining a group). The formal group is yet another approach to the specification of Lie groups, infinitesimally. It is known, however, that local topological groups do not necessarily have global counterparts.

Examples of infinite-dimensional pseudogroups abound, beginning with the pseudogroup of all diffeomorphisms of {{math|E}}. The interest is mainly in sub-pseudogroups of the diffeomorphisms, and therefore with objects that have a Lie algebra analogue of vector fields. Methods proposed by Lie and by Cartan for studying these objects have become more practical given the progress of computer algebra.

In the 1950s, Cartan's theory was reformulated by Shiing-Shen Chern, and a general deformation theory for pseudogroups was developed by Kunihiko Kodaira{{Cite journal |last=Kodaira |first=K. |date=1960 |title=On Deformations of Some Complex Pseudo-Group Structures |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1970083 |journal=Annals of Mathematics |volume=71 |issue=2 |pages=224–302 |doi=10.2307/1970083 |jstor=1970083 |issn=0003-486X }} and D. C. Spencer.{{Cite journal |last1=Guillemin |first1=Victor |last2=Sternberg |first2=Shlomo |date=1966 |title=Deformation theory of pseudogroup structures |journal=Memoirs of the American Mathematical Society |issue=64 |pages=0 |doi=10.1090/memo/0064 |issn=0065-9266 |doi-access=free}} In the 1960s homological algebra was applied to the basic PDE questions involved, of over-determination; this though revealed that the algebra of the theory is potentially very heavy. In the same decade the interest for theoretical physics of infinite-dimensional Lie theory appeared for the first time, in the shape of current algebra.

Intuitively, a Lie pseudogroup should be a pseudogroup which "originates" from a system of PDEs. There are many similar but inequivalent notions in the literature;{{Cite book |last1=Kumpera |first1=Antonio|url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9781400881734 |title=Lie Equations, Vol. I |last2=Spencer |first2=Donald Clayton |date=1973-01-01 |publisher=Princeton University Press |doi=10.1515/9781400881734 |isbn=978-1-4008-8173-4 }}{{Cite journal |last1=Singer |first1=I. M. |last2=Sternberg |first2=Shlomo |date=1965 |title=The infinite groups of Lie and Cartan Part I, (The transitive groups) |journal=Journal d'Analyse Mathématique |volume=15 |issue=1 |pages=1–114 |doi=10.1007/bf02787690 |doi-access= |s2cid=123124081 |issn=0021-7670 }}{{Cite book |last=Claude. |first=Albert |url=http://worldcat.org/oclc/715985799 |title=Pseudogroupes de Lie transitifs |date=1984–1987 |publisher=Hermann |oclc=715985799 }}{{Cite journal |last=Kuranishi |first=Masatake |date=1959 |title=On the Local Theory of Continuous Infinite Pseudo Groups I |journal=Nagoya Mathematical Journal |volume=15 |pages=225–260 |doi=10.1017/s0027763000006747 |issn=0027-7630 |doi-access=free }}{{Cite journal |last1=Olver |first1=Peter J. |last2=Pohjanpelto |first2=Juha |date=2005 |title=Maurer–Cartan forms and the structure of Lie pseudo-groups |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00029-005-0008-7 |journal=Selecta Mathematica |volume=11 |issue=1 |pages=99–126 |doi=10.1007/s00029-005-0008-7 |s2cid=14712181 |issn=1022-1824 }} the "right" one depends on which application one has in mind. However, all these various approaches involve the (finite- or infinite-dimensional) jet bundles of {{math|Γ}}, which are asked to be a Lie groupoid. In particular, a Lie pseudogroup is called of finite order {{math|k}} if it can be "reconstructed" from the space of its {{math|k}}-jets.

{{reflist}}

• {{cite journal | author=St. Golab | title=Über den Begriff der "Pseudogruppe von Transformationen" | journal=Mathematische Annalen | year=1939 | volume=116 | pages=768–780 | doi=10.1007/BF01597390| s2cid=124962440 }}

• {{springer|id=p/p075710|title=Pseudo-groups|author=Alekseevskii, D.V.}}

Category:Lie groups

Category:Algebraic structures

Category:Differential geometry

Category:Differential topology