rational fideism

Rational fideism is the philosophical view that considers faith to be precursor for any reliable knowledge. Every paradigmatic system, whether one considers rationalism or empiricism, is based on axioms that are neither self-founding nor self-evident (see the Münchhausen trilemma), so it appeals to assumptions accepted as belief (in reason or experience respectively). Thus, faith is basic to knowability. On the other hand, such a conclusion is reached not with an act of faith but with reasoning, a rational argumentation.

Definitions

"Rational fideism" has been defined variously. The following are some definitions.

For Joseph Glanvill rational fideism is the view that "Faith, and faith alone, is the basis for our belief in our reason. We believe in our reason because we believe in God's veracity. We do not try to prove that God is truthful; we believe this. Thus, faith in God gives us faith in reason, which in turn "justifies" our belief that God is no deceiver."Richard H. Popkin, The History of Scepticism, Oxford University Press, 2003, p. 213.

Richard Popkin sees rational fideism as the opposite of "pure, blind, fideism".Ira O.Wade, Intellectual Origins of the French Enlightenment, Princeton University Press, 1971, p. 552.

Similarly, Domenic Marbaniang sees rational fideism as "the view that the knowledge of God can be certified through faith alone that is based on a revelation that is rationally verified."{{cite thesis |type=PhD |last=Marbaniang |first=Domenic Savio |year=2007 |institution=ACTS Academy of Higher Education |title=Epistemics of Divine Reality |url=https://www.academia.edu/38226207}} Observing that the way of both rationalism and empiricism towards the knowledge of ultimate or transcendent reality is bleak, he thinks that while fideism is the view that truth in religion rests solely on faith and not on a reasoning process, rational fideism "holds that truth in religion rests solely on faith; not blind faith, but faith that can give rational and cogent answers or reason to warrant the belief."

According to C. Stephen Evans, rational fideism involves the possibility of reason becoming self-critical. Seeing it as the kind of responsible fideism, he states, "If human reason has limitations and also has some ability to recognise those limitations, then the possibility of responsible fideism emerges."{{cite book |first=Charles Stephen |last=Evans |author-link=C. Stephen Evans |title=Faith Beyond Reason |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=wVi5wAEACAAJ |publisher=Edinburgh University Press |year=1998 |page=55 |isbn=9780748607945}} Evans states that not only does reason have limitations, it is also tainted by sin making one entitled to faith where reason fails.{{cite thesis |type=PhD |last=Butcher |first=Matthew P. |year=2013 |institution=Loyola University Chicago |title=Fideism, Evidentialism, and the Epistemology of Religious Belief|url=https://ecommons.luc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1507&context=luc_diss}}

Patrick J. Clarke defines rational fideism as the approach that sees "reason as capable of providing the intellectual foundation of faith, not a priori but a posteriori, much as philosophy provides an intellectual foundation to theology."{{cite book |first=Patrick J. |last=Clarke |title=Examining Philosophy and Ethics. Answers for A Level Nelson |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=6oquI2LG5UMC |publisher=Nelson Thornes |location=Cheltenham |year=2002 |page=[https://books.google.com/books?id=6oquI2LG5UMC&dq=%22reason+as+capable+of+providing+the+intellectual+foundation+of+faith,+not+a+priori+but+a+posteriori,+much+as+philosophy+provides+an+intellectual+foundation+to+theology%22&pg=PA28 28] |isbn=9780748760091}}

Arguments for rational fideism

Brendan Sweetman notes a type of rational fideism as a view developed by some thinkers who hold that the pragmatic spiritual and moral success of believing in God on faith alone could be used as an "indirect argument for the truth of fideism."{{cite book |editor-last1=Copan |editor-first1=Paul |editor-link1=Paul Copan |editor-last2=Longman III |editor-first2=Tremper |editor-link2=Tremper Longman |editor-last3=Reese |editor-first3=Christopher L. |editor-last4=Strauss |editor-first4=Michael |last=Sweetman |first=Brendan |authorlink=Brendan Sweetman |title=Dictionary of Christianity and Science. The Definitive Reference for the Intersection of Christian Faith and Contemporary Science |publisher=Zondervan |location=Grand Rapids, Michigan |year=2017 |page=[https://books.google.com/books?id=rUxsDAAAQBAJ&pg=PA282 282] |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=rUxsDAAAQBAJ |isbn=9780310496069}}

Arguments against rational fideism

R.C. Sproul, John Gerstner, and Arthur Lindsley argue that "Rational fideism is a contradiction in terms" since requiring a criterion for belief is non-fideistic as fideism begins with belief; that is, fideistic belief proceeds from faith rather than reaching faith as a result of rational query.{{cite book |last1=Sproul |first1=R.C. |last2=Gerstner |first2=John |last3=Lindsey |first3=Arthur |title=Classical Apologetics |date=1984 |publisher=Harper Collins Publishers |location=Grand Rapids |isbn=0310449510 |page=336}}

References

External links

{{cite encyclopedia |last=Amesbury |first=Richard |editor-last=Zalta |editor-first=Edward N. |editor-link=Edward N. Zalta |chapter=4. A Rational Fideism? |chapter-url=https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2022/entries/fideism/#4 |title=Fideism |encyclopedia=Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy |edition=Summer 2022}}
{{cite journal |last=Insole |first=Christopher |title='Kierkegaard': A Reasonable Fideist? |journal=The Heythrop Journal |date=October 1998 |volume=39 |issue=4 |pages=363–378 |doi=10.1111/1468-2265.00084|doi-access=free }}

Category:Epistemics

Category:Epistemology of religion

Category:Foundationalism

Category:History of logic

Category:Theories of justification