revisionist just war theory

Revisionist just war theory is a development of just war theory that, unlike traditional just war theory, seeks to integrate jus ad bellum and jus in bello, therefore rejecting many traditional beliefs such as moral equality of combatants.{{cite journal |last1=Kirkpatrick |first1=Jesse |title=Moral Injury and Revisionist Just War Theory |journal=Ethics & International Affairs |date=2022 |volume=36 |issue=1 |pages=27–35 |doi=10.1017/S0892679422000041}}{{cite journal |last1=Chehtman |first1=Alejandro |title=Revisionist Just War Theory and the Concept of War Crimes |journal=Leiden Journal of International Law |date=2018 |volume=31 |issue=1 |pages=171–194 |doi=10.1017/S0922156517000498|hdl=11336/74488 |hdl-access=free }} Opposing traditionalists such as Michael Walzer,{{cite journal |last1=Lazar |first1=Seth |title=Just War Theory: Revisionists Versus Traditionalists |journal=Annual Review of Political Science |date=2017 |volume=20 |issue=1 |pages=37–54 |doi=10.1146/annurev-polisci-060314-112706|doi-access=free }} revisionists include Jeff McMahan, Cécile Fabre, Bradley J. Strawser, and David Rodin.{{cite book |last1=Meireis |first1=Torsten |title=Handbuch Friedensethik |date=2017 |publisher=Springer Fachmedien |isbn=978-3-658-14686-3 |pages=327–339 |language=de |chapter=Die Revisionist Just War Theory: Jeff McMahan}}