software framework

Software frameworks differ from standard libraries in key ways:

• Inversion of control: Unlike libraries, where user code controls the program’s flow of execution, frameworks dictate the program’s structure, calling user code at specific points (e.g., through predefined templates or hooks). This is usually achieved with the Template Method Pattern.
• Default behaviour: Frameworks provide pre-implemented functionality (e.g., standard features or workflows) that works out-of-the-box and can be used as-is or lightly customized, often within a predefined structure. Libraries, by contrast, require user code to build and configure functionality from scratch. A framework's default behavior can be provided with the invariant methods of the Template Method Pattern in an abstract class.
• Extensibility: Frameworks enable developers to add new functionality or significantly modify (or override) behavior through structured mechanisms like hooks or APIs. Libraries allow extensibility, but it is unstructured, relying on user code to integrate functions without predefined integration points. A framework's extensibility is usually achieved by a hook method in a subclass that overrides a template method in the superclass
• Non-modifiable framework code: Framework core code is generally fixed, accepting user extensions (e.g., plugins or subclasses) without allowing modifications to the framework itself.

{{Multiple issues|section=yes|

{{More citations needed|section|date=April 2011}}

{{Summarize section|date=April 2020}}

{{Weasel|section|date=April 2020}}

{{Essay-like|section|date=April 2020}}

}}

The designers of software frameworks aim to facilitate software developments by allowing designers and programmers to devote their time to meeting software requirements rather than dealing with the more standard low-level details of providing a working system, thereby reducing overall development time.{{cite web |url=http://docforge.com/wiki/Framework |title=Framework |accessdate=15 December 2008 |work=DocForge |archive-date=7 October 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181007003315/http://www.docforge.com/wiki/Framework |url-status=dead }} For example, a team using a web framework to develop a banking website can focus on writing code particular to banking rather than the mechanics of request handling and state management.

Frameworks often add to the size of programs, a phenomenon termed "code bloat". Due to customer-demand-driven applications needs, both competing and complementary frameworks sometimes end up in a product. Further, due to the complexity of their APIs, the intended reduction in overall development time may not be achieved due to the need to spend additional time learning to use the framework; this criticism is clearly valid when a special or new framework is first encountered by development staff.{{citation needed|date=April 2011}} If such a framework is not used in subsequent job taskings, the time invested in learning the framework can cost more than purpose-written code familiar to the project's staff; many programmers keep copies of useful boilerplate code for common needs.

However, once a framework is learned, future projects can be faster and easier to complete; the concept of a framework is to make a one-size-fits-all solution set, and with familiarity, code production should logically rise. There are no such claims made about the size of the code eventually bundled with the output product, nor its relative efficiency and conciseness. Using any library solution necessarily pulls in extras and unused extraneous assets unless the software is a compiler-object linker making a tight (small, wholly controlled, and specified) executable module.

The issue continues, but a decade-plus of industry experience{{citation needed|date=April 2011}} has shown that the most effective frameworks turn out to be those that evolve from re-factoring the common code of the enterprise, instead of using a generic "one-size-fits-all" framework developed by third parties for general purposes. An example of that would be how the user interface in such an application package as an office suite grows to have common look, feel, and data-sharing attributes and methods, as the once disparate bundled applications, grow unified into a suite that is tighter and smaller; the newer/evolved suite can be a product that shares integral utility libraries and user interfaces.

This trend in the controversy brings up an important issue about frameworks. Creating a framework that is elegant, versus one that merely solves a problem, is still rather a craft than a science. "Software elegance" implies clarity, conciseness, and little waste (extra or extraneous functionality, much of which is user-defined). For those frameworks that generate code, for example, "elegance" would imply the creation of code that is clean and comprehensible to a reasonably knowledgeable programmer (and which is therefore readily modifiable), versus one that merely generates correct code. The elegance issue is why relatively few software frameworks have stood the test of time: the best frameworks have been able to evolve gracefully as the underlying technology on which they were built advanced. Even there, having evolved, many such packages will retain legacy capabilities bloating the final software as otherwise replaced methods have been retained in parallel with the newer methods.

Software frameworks typically contain considerable housekeeping and utility code in order to help bootstrap user applications, but generally focus on specific problem domains, such as:

• Artistic drawing, music composition, and mechanical CAD{{citation|doi = 10.1145/98188.98197|last1 = Vlissides|first1 = J M|last2 = Linton|first2 = M A|year = 1990|title = Unidraw: a framework for building domain-specific graphical editors|journal = ACM Transactions on Information Systems|volume = 8|issue = 3|pages =237–268|s2cid = 11248368|doi-access = free}}{{citation|last = Johnson|first = R E| title=Conference proceedings on Object-oriented programming systems, languages, and applications - OOPSLA '92 | chapter=Documenting frameworks using patterns | date=1992 |publisher = ACM Press|pages = 63–76| doi=10.1145/141936.141943 | isbn=0201533723 | s2cid=604969 | doi-access=free }}
• Financial modeling applications{{citation|last1 = Birrer|first1 = A|first2 = T|last2 = Eggenschwiler|year = 1993|work = Frameworks in the financial engineering domain: an experience report|publisher = Springer-Verlag|title = Proceedings of the European conference on object-oriented programming|pages = 21–35}}
• Earth system modeling applications{{citation|last1 = Hill|first1 = C|first2 = C|last2 = DeLuca|first3 = V|last3 = Balaji|first4 = M|last4 = Suarez|first5 = A|last5 = da Silva|title = Architecture of the Earth System Modeling Framework (ESMF)|journal = Computing in Science and Engineering|volume = 6|year = 2004|pages = 18–28|title-link = ESMF|doi = 10.1109/MCISE.2004.1255817|s2cid = 9311752}}
• Decision support systems{{citation|last = Gachet|first = A|year = 2003|title = Software Frameworks for Developing Decision Support Systems – A New Component in the Classification of DSS Development Tools|journal = Journal of Decision Systems|volume = 12|issue = 3|pages = 271–281|doi = 10.3166/jds.12.271-280|s2cid = 29690836}}
• Media playback and authoring
• Web framework
• Middleware
• Cactus Framework – High performance scientific computing.
• Application framework – General GUI applications.
• Enterprise Architecture framework
• Oracle Application Development Framework
• Laravel (PHP Framework)
• Malware, for example Pipedream
• Php4delphi
• OpenSilver - enables legacy applications based on Microsoft Silverlight, WPF, and LightSwitch to be ported into WebAssembly applications.

According to Pree,{{citation|title = Meta Patterns: A Means for Capturing the Essentials of Reusable Object-Oriented Design |author = Pree, W |journal = Proceedings of the 8th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming |volume = 821 |pages = 150–162 |year = 1994 |publisher = Springer-Verlag|doi = 10.1007/BFb0052181 |citeseerx = 10.1.1.74.7935 |series = Lecture Notes in Computer Science |isbn = 978-3-540-58202-1 }} software frameworks consist of frozen spots and hot spots. Frozen spots define the overall architecture of a software system, that is to say its basic components and the relationships between them. These remain unchanged (frozen) in any instantiation of the application framework. Hot spots represent those parts where the programmers using the framework add their own code to add the functionality specific to their own project.

In an object-oriented environment, a framework consists of abstract and concrete classes. Instantiation of such a framework consists of composing and subclassing the existing classes.{{citation|last = Buschmann|first = F|year = 1996|title = Pattern-Oriented Software Architecture Volume 1: A System of Patterns. Chichester|publisher = Wiley|isbn = 978-0-471-95869-7}}

The necessary functionality can be implemented by using the Template Method Pattern in which the frozen spots are known as invariant methods and the hot spots are known as variant or hook methods. The invariant methods in the superclass provide default behaviour while the hook methods in each subclass provide custom behaviour.

When developing a concrete software system with a software framework, developers utilize the hot spots according to the specific needs and requirements of the system. Software frameworks rely on the Hollywood Principle: "Don't call us, we'll call you."{{citation|last = Larman|first = C|year = 2001|title = Applying UML and Patterns: An Introduction to Object-Oriented Analysis and Design and the Unified Process|isbn = 978-0-13-092569-5|publisher = Prentice Hall|edition = 2nd}}{{cite book|title=Design Patterns|last1=Gamma|first1=Erich|last2=Helm|first2=Richard|last3=Johnson|first3=Ralph|last4=Vlissides|first4=John|publisher=Addison-Wesley|year=1994|isbn=0-201-63361-2|authorlink1=Erich Gamma|authorlink2=Richard Helm|authorlink3=Ralph Johnson (computer scientist)|authorlink4=John Vlissides|title-link=Design Patterns}} This means that the user-defined classes (for example, new subclasses) receive messages from the predefined framework classes. Developers usually handle this by implementing superclass abstract methods.

• Class (computer programming)
• Software design pattern
• Don't repeat yourself
• Implicit invocation
• Software engine

{{Reflist}}

• {{Wiktionary inline|software framework}}
• {{Commons category inline|Software frameworks}}

{{Authority control}}

{{Computer science}}

Category:Object-oriented programming

Category:Software architecture