sun protective clothing#UPF rating

Although clothing has been used for protection against solar exposure for thousands of years, modern sun protective clothing was popularized (but not exclusively used) in Australia as an option or adjunct to sunscreen lotions and sunblock creams. Sun protective clothing and UV protective fabrics in Australia now follow a lab-testing procedure regulated by a Commonwealth agency: ARPANSA.{{cite web |url=http://www.arpansa.gov.au/services/upf/ |title=Ultraviolet Protection Factor (UPF) Testing |publisher=Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency (ARPANSA) |accessdate=November 29, 2014}} This standard was established in 1996 after work by Australian swimwear companies. The British standard was established in 1998 by the National Radiological Protection Board and the British Standards Institute. Using the Australian method as a model, the US standard was formally established in 2001, and now employs a more-stringent testing protocol that includes fabric longevity, abrasion/wear and washability. UPF testing is now widely used on clothing for outdoor activities.

The original UPF rating system was enhanced in the United States by the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) Committee D13.65, at the behest of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the Consumer Product Safety Commission, to qualify and standardize the emerging sun protective clothing and textile industry. When the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) discontinued regulating sun-protective clothing, the Solar Protective Factory (whose CEO chaired the ASTM Committee) took the lead in developing the UPF testing protocols and labeling standards that are presently used in the United States.{{cite web|title=About Us|url=http://www.spfstore.com/aboutus.asp|publisher=Solar Protective Factory|accessdate=July 5, 2014}}

In 1992, the FDA reviewed clothing that was being marketed with claims of sun protection (SPF, % UV blockage, or skin cancer prevention). Only one brand of sun protective clothing, Solumbra, was cleared under medical device regulations. The FDA initially regulated sun protective clothing as a medical device, but later transferred oversight for general sun protective clothing to the FTC. The UPF rating system may eventually be adopted by interested apparel/textile/fabric manufacturers as a "value added" program for consumer safety and awareness. Before UPF standards were in place (which directly measure a fabric's ability to block UV radiation), clothing was previously rated using SPF standards (which measure how long a person's skin takes to redden).

Factors that affect the level of sun protection provided by a fabric, in approximate order of importance, include weave, color, weight, stretch, and wetness. The less open or more dense the fabric (weave, weight, stretch), the better the protection. Getting a fabric wet reduces the protection as much as half, except for silk and viscose which can get more protective when wet. Polyester contains a benzene ring that absorbs UV light. In addition, UV absorbers may be added at various points in the manufacturing process to enhance protection levels. In 2003, chemical company BASF embedded nanoparticles of titanium dioxide into a nylon fabric, which can be used for sun protective clothing that maintains its UV protection when wet.[https://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/3312307/Sunblock-without-the-mess...-wear-a-nano-bikini-and-hat-on-the-beach.html "Sunblock without the mess: Wear a nano bikini and hat on the beach"], The Daily Telegraph, April 10, 2003. Retrieved April 13, 2015.

There is some indication that washing fabrics in detergents containing fabric brighteners, which absorb UV radiation, might increase their protective capability. Studies at the University of Alberta also indicate that darker-colored fabrics offer more protection than lighter-colored fabrics."Safe in the sun", Consumer Reports, 00107174, July 2000, Vol. 65, Issue 7

While there is some correlation between the percentages of visible light and UV that pass through the same fabric, it is not a strong relationship. With new-technology textiles designed for the sole purpose of UV blocking, it is not always possible to judge the UV protection level simply by holding up the fabric and examining how much visible light passes through.{{Citation needed|date=May 2009}}

Provide more protection: {{Citation needed|date=October 2021}}

• specially manufactured fabrics
• cotton viscose fabrics
• black or dark blue denim jeans
• wool garments
• satin-finished silk of any weight
• tightly woven Bamboo/Lycra fabric
• polyacrylonitrile
• 100% polyester
• shiny polyester blends
• tightly woven fabrics
• REPREVE fabric
• unbleached cotton (most cotton sold is bleached) {{Cite web |title=Sun Protection in the Garden: The Benefits of UPF Clothing |url=https://farmersdefense.com/blogs/news/benefits-of-upf-clothing-while-gardening |access-date=2022-12-27 |website=Farmers Defense |language=en}}
• bamboo/cotton blend

Provide less protection: {{Citation needed|date=October 2021}}

• polyester crepe
• bleached cotton
• viscose
• knits
• undyed/white jeans
• worn/old fabric

A relatively new rating designation for sun protective textiles and clothing is UPF (ultraviolet protection factor), which represents the ratio of sunburn-causing UV measured without and with the protection of the fabric. For example, a fabric rated UPF 30 means that, if 30 units of UV fall on the fabric, only 1 unit will pass through to the skin. A UPF 30 fabric that blocks 29 out of 30 units of UV is therefore blocking 96.7%. Unlike SPF (sun protection factor) measurements that traditionally use human sunburn testing, UPF is measured using a laboratory instrument (spectrophotometer or spectroradiometer) and an artificial light source, and then applying a sunburn weighting curve (erythemal action spectrum) across the relevant UV wavelengths. Theoretically, human SPF testing and instrument UPF testing both generate comparable measurements of a product's ability to protect against sunburn.

Below is the ASTM Standard for Sun Protective Clothing and Swimwear:

According to testing by Consumer Reports, UPF 30+ is typical for protective fabrics, while UPF 20 is typical for standard summer fabrics.{{cn|date=July 2020}}

Developed in 1998 by Committee RA106, the testing standard for sun protective fabrics in the United States is the American Association of Textile Chemists and Colorists (AATCC) Test Method 183.{{cite web |url=http://www.aatcc.org/Technical/Test_Methods/scopes/tm183.cfm |publisher=American Association of Textile Chemists and Colorists (AATCC) |title=Test Method 183 |access-date=November 29, 2014 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150128014343/http://www.aatcc.org/Technical/Test_Methods/scopes/tm183.cfm |archive-date=January 28, 2015 }} This method is based on the original guidelines established in Australia in 1994.

AATCC 183 should be used in conjunction with other related standards including ASTM D 6544{{cite web |url=http://www.astm.org/Standards/D6544.htm |title=ASTM D6544 – Standard Practice for Preparation of Textiles Prior to Ultraviolet (UV) Transmission Testing |publisher=American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) |accessdate=November 29, 2014}} and ASTM D 6603.{{cite web |url=http://www.astm.org/Standards/D6603.htm |title=ASTM D6603 – Standard Specification for Labeling of UV-Protective Textiles |publisher=American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) |accessdate=November 29, 2014}} ASTM D 6544 specifies simulating the life cycle of a fabric so that a UPF test can be done near the end of the fabric's life, when it typically provides the least UV protection. ASTM D 6603 is a consumer format recommended for visible hangtag and care labeling of sun protective clothing and textiles. A manufacturer may publish a test result to a maximum of UPF 50+.

Sun protective clothing and textile/fabric manufacturers are currently a self-regulating industry in North America, prescribed by the AATCC and ASTM methods of testing.

{{col div|colwidth=30em}}

• Dress code
• Hemline
• Rash guard
• Sunglasses
• Sun hat
• Sunlight
• Umbrellas
• UV index

{{colend}}

{{Reflist}}

• {{cite journal | author=Gies, H.P., Roy, C.R., Elliot, G., & Zongli, W. | title=Ultraviolet Radiation Protection Factors for Clothing | journal=Health Physics | year=1994 | volume=67 | issue=2 | pages=131–139 | url=http://www.health-physics.com/pt/re/healthphys/abstract.00004032-199408000-00003.htm | doi=10.1097/00004032-199408000-00003 | pmid=8026966 | s2cid=6620158 }}
• {{cite journal | author=Gambichler, T., Rotterdam, Altmeyer, P., & Hoffmann, K. | title=Protection against ultraviolet radiation by commercial summer clothing: need for standardized testing and labelling | journal=BMC Dermatology | year=2001 | volume=I | pages=6–9 | url= | doi=10.1186/1471-5945-1-6 | pmid=11710968 | pmc=59842 | doi-access=free }}
• {{cite journal | author=Stanford, Duncan G., Georgouras, Katherine E. & Pailthorpe, Michael T. | title=Rating clothing for sun protection: current status in Australia | journal=Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology | year=1997 | volume=8 | issue=1 | pages=12–17 | doi=10.1016/S0926-9959(96)00101-8 }}

{{sunscreening agents}}

Category:Safety clothing

Category:Sun tanning