talk:Dragon's Crown

{{GA|07:25, 10 March 2020 (UTC)|topic=Video games|page=1|oldid=944842209}}

{{WikiProject banner shell|class=GA|

{{WikiProject Video games|class=GA|importance=low}}

}}

{{refideas

|1=https://www.timeextension.com/guides/best-beat-em-ups-of-all-time

|2=https://archive.org/details/dreamcast-es-4/page/n39/mode/2up

}}

{{Archives|auto=yes|search=yes}}

Characters

No section on Characters? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.0.70.62 (talk) 07:55, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

Proposed merge of [[:Sorceress (Dragon's Crown)]] into [[:Dragon's Crown]]

Is this character really notable enough for an article? I can understand a character being notable partially on account of their design, but the Sorceress only received attention due to her design. This controversy can easily be added in a "Controversy" section in the main Dragon's Crown article, since that's pretty much all this article is. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 16:26, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

:Hey, I've still got some sources to implement, but it's a fair point. I'm away from home right now, so could you gimme a week+ to do the work and, failing the article not overcoming the issues, I'll be fine with merging. - Bryn (talk) (contributions) 17:21, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

::If she got mentioned for any other reason about her character besides her sexualization, then I wouldn't see a problem. However, literally all the critical comments appear to be either criticizing how large her breasts are, or defending the design, hence the problem with it being one-note. (There is also a problem with WP:SUSTAINED since all the articles about that appear to be from around the same time, rather than continuing discussion about the character). ZXCVBNM (TALK) 19:13, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

:::I haven't seen anything about the Sorceress besides press comments on her design. Even Kamitani hasn't talked about her that much except in the context of being surprised by the reaction from the Western press. I should know, I've been neck-deep in Vanillaware info during an expansion/rewrite of the company article. I don't think that article's notable enough to stand up. Plus, Dragon's Crown doesn't have much of a story, as per its design, so she doesn't have anything substantial in that regard either. In fact, pun and reference intended, there's an overlarge bias towards one part of her. And that can be covered by commentary in the main article. --ProtoDrake (talk) 22:36, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

{{Talk:Dragon's Crown/GA1}}