talk:Solar Physics (journal)

:The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved. Number 57 11:57, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

----

:Solar Physics (journal) → {{no redirect|Solar Physics}} – letter case suffices for disambiguation – Fgnievinski (talk) 04:42, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

:This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:36, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

• Oppose Solar physics and Solar Physics could easily be mistaken. This is a (journal) so being labelled as one does no harm and makes article easier to locate in a bunch of search results. In ictu oculi (talk) 10:09, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
• Oppose Agree with In ictu oculi. --Randykitty (talk) 14:32, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
• Oppose per above. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 15:00, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
• Oppose per above.TR 15:54, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
• Oppose per above. Primefac (talk) 17:49, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
• Oppose as a different case for one letter does not suffice for disambiguation. Modest Genius ^talk 22:28, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
• You guys are wrong according to WP:DIFFCAPS and WP:PRECISE. Fgnievinski (talk) 02:40, 27 September 2014 (UTC)
• Oppose Agreed that WP:DIFFCAPS is relevant here. The last paragraph there says "this form of disambiguation may not be sufficient if one article is far more likely a primary topic than the other." I think this is the case here--the field of solar physics is much more of a primary topic than the journal. Thus I support Solar Physics being a redirect to Solar physics, and Solar physics having a hatnote pointing to Solar Physics (journal). --Mark viking (talk) 04:07, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

:The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Not moved. (non-admin closure) Adumbrativus (talk) 02:00, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

----

:Solar Physics (journal) → {{no redirect|Solar Physics}} – capitalization already offers enough distinction from solar physics. fgnievinski (talk) 00:46, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

:This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 06:09, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

• {{ping|Fgnievinski|Randy Kryn}} queried move request Anthony Appleyard (talk) 06:11, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
• Would respectfully disagree, the capitalized form should go to the Solar physics page, an easy search mistake which isn't actually that much of a mistake. Randy Kryn (talk) 04:05, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
• Oppose per the other Randy K. :-)
• Oppose and why was it attempted as a technical request with previous RM? In ictu oculi (talk) 14:27, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
• Oppose per the above. BD2412 T 00:48, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
• Oppose per others, just Solar Physics would not be clear enough. SunDawn (talk) 12:28, 30 June 2021 (UTC)