thrownness

{{Short description|Heideggerian ontological conception of the human condition}}

Thrownness ({{Langx|de|Geworfenheit}}) is a concept introduced by German philosopher Martin Heidegger (1889–1976) to describe humans' individual existences as being 'thrown' (geworfen) into the world.

Overview

Geworfen denotes the arbitrary character of Dasein{{'s}} experience in the sense of its having been born into a specific family in a particular culture at a given moment of human history. The past, through Being-toward-death, becomes a part of Dasein. Awareness and acknowledgment of the arbitrariness of Dasein is characterized as a state of "thrown-ness" in the present with all its attendant frustrations, sufferings, and demands that one does not choose, such as social conventions or ties of kinship and duty. The very fact of one's own existence is a manifestation of thrown-ness. The idea of the past as a matrix not chosen, but at the same time not utterly binding or deterministic, results in the notion of Geworfenheit—a kind of alienation that human beings struggle against, and that leaves a paradoxical opening for freedom:

{{quote|The thrower of the project is thrown in his own throw. How can we account for this freedom? We cannot. It is simply a fact, not caused or grounded, but the condition of all causation and grounding.

}}

For William J. Richardson, Geworfenheit "must be understood in a purely ontological sense as wishing to signify the matter-of-fact character of human finitude".{{rp|37}} That's why "thrownness" is the best English word for Geworfenheit. Richardson: "[Other] attractive translations such as 'abandon,' 'dereliction,' 'dejection,' etc. [...] are [dangerous because they are] too rich with ontic, anthropological connotations. We retain 'thrown-ness' as closest to the original and, perhaps, least misleading."{{rp|37}}

In his main work The Principle of Hope (1954–1959), the anti-Heideggerian author Ernst Bloch has correlated the thrownness into the world with a dog's life: hope "will not tolerate a dog's life which feels itself only passively thrown into What Is, which is not seen through, even wretchedly recognized."

Legacy

In their 1986 book Understanding Computers and Cognition. A New Foundation for Design, authors Terry Winograd and Fernando Flores applied Heidegger's concept of thrownness to the field of software design.

See also

References

{{cite book |author=Ernst Bloch |title=The Principle of Hope |date=1954 |volume=1 |page=3 |lang=de |quote=Sie erträgt kein Hundeleben, das sich ins Seiende nur passiv geworfen fühlt, in undurchschautes, gar jämmerlich anerkanntes.}}

{{cite news |author=Simon Critchley |title=Being and Time, part 4: Thrown into this world |url=https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/belief/2009/jun/29/religion-philosophy |date=June 29, 2009 |access-date=May 27, 2013 |journal=The Guardian |location=Manchester |quote=As Jim Morrison intoned many decades ago, 'Into this world we're thrown'. Thrownness (Geworfenheit) is the simple awareness that we always find ourselves somewhere, namely delivered over to a world.}}

{{cite book |author=Daniel O. Dahlstrom |title=The Heidegger Dictionary |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=lUtMAQAAQBAJ |chapter=Thrownness (Geworfenheit) (pp. 212–215) |year=2013 |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=lUtMAQAAQBAJ&dq=%22Thrownness+(Geworfenheit)%22&pg=PA212 |publisher=A & C Black |location=London |isbn=978-1-847-06514-8 }}

{{cite book |title=The Doors - Sounds for Your Soul - Die Musik Der Doors |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=8xk_-cOcPH4C&pg=196 |author=Heinz Gerstenmeyer |date=2001 |page=196 | publisher=BoD – Books on Demand |isbn=978-3-831-12057-4 |lang=de}}

{{cite book |author=Michael J. Inwood |title=A Heidegger Dictionary |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=OfHJke63FNkC |publisher=Wiley |location=Hoboken, New Jersey |date=1999 |isbn=978-0-631-19095-0}} Now quoted in {{cite book |first=Naresh Kumar |last=Agarwal |others=Contributor Gary Marchionini |title=Exploring Context in Information Behavior. Seeker, Situation, Surroundings, and Shared Identities |journal=Synthesis Lectures on Information Concepts, Retrieval, and Services |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=nuZCDwAAQBAJ |publisher=Morgan & Claypool Publishers |location=San Rafael, California |date=2017 |volume=9 |issue=7 |isbn=978-1-681-73082-0 |page=[https://books.google.com/books?id=nuZCDwAAQBAJ&dq=%22The+thrower+of+the+project+is+thrown+in+his+own+throw.+How+can+we+account+for+this+freedom&pg=PA11 11] |doi=10.2200/S00807ED1V01Y201710ICR061}}

{{cite book |title=Listening for Utopia in Ernst Bloch's Musical Philosophy |author=Benjamin M. Korstvedt |date=2010 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |page=44 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=SinUwMlJZbsC&pg=PA44 |isbn=978-0-521-89615-3 |quote=Bloch specifically criticized the futile quiescence inherent in Heidegger's 'mist of illusionary problems and hopeless subjectivism' and made the point that any future 'concrete utopia' will emerge from 'active hope' and 'conscious human work on it,' not end in poetic metaphysics.}}

{{cite book |author=William J. Richardson |title=Heidegger: Through Phenomenology to Thought |publisher=Martinus Nijhoff Publishers |location=The Hague |year=1963 |page=37 |isbn=9780823222551 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=C0cf3q3NJuwC&pg=PA37}} {{ISBN|978-0-823-22255-1}}. {{ISBN|0-82322255-1}}.

{{cite book |title=Understanding Computers and Cognition. A New Foundation for Design |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=2sRC8vcDYNEC |chapter=3.3. An Illustration of thrownness (pp. 33ff.) |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=2sRC8vcDYNEC&pg=PA33 |author1=Terry Winograd |author2=Fernando Flores |year=1988 |publisher=Intellect Books |location=Bristol |isbn=978-0-893-91050-1}}