treaty establishing the European Defence Community
{{Short description|1952 agreement on common security protocols}}
{{use dmy dates|date=May 2024}}
{{Infobox Treaty
| long_name = {{EU-institution in official languages
|name =Treaty establishing the European Defence Community
|width =
|font-size =
|nl = Verdrag tot oprichting van de Europese Defensiegemeenschap
|fr = Traité instituant la Communauté européenne de défense
|de = Vertrag zur Gründung der Europäischen Verteidigungsgemeinschaft
|it = Trattato istitutivo della Comunità Europea di Difesa
}}
| name = Treaty of Paris
| image = EDC ratification 2025.svg
| image_width = 260px
| caption = Ratification statuses in signatory states: Green (ratified), Blue (signed)
| type = Military pact
| context = European integration
| date_drafted = 24 October 1950
| location_signed = Paris
| date_signed = 27 May 1952
| condition_effective = Ratification by all founding states
| depositor = Government of France
| date_expiry = 50 years after entry into effect
| date_effective =
| parties = {{Collapsible list | title = 6
| {{Flagu|Belgium}}
| {{Flagu|France}}
| {{Flagu|West Germany}}
| {{Flagu|Italy}}
| {{Flagu|Luxembourg}}
| {{Flagu|Netherlands}}
}}
| ratifiers = {{Composition bar|4|6|hex=#003366}}
| languages =
| wikisource = fr:Traité instituant la Communauté européenne de défense
}}
The Treaty establishing the European Defence Community (EDC), also known as the Treaty of Paris,{{cite journal |last=Pastor-Castro |first=Rogelia |date=2006 |title=The Quai d'Orsay and the European Defence Community Crisis of 1954 |journal=History |volume=91 |number=3 |pages=386–400 |doi=10.1111/j.1468-229X.2006.00371.x |jstor=24427965 |jstor-access=free}} is a treaty of European integration, which upon entry into force would create a European defence force, with shared budget and joint procurement. This force would operate as an autonomous European pillar within the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO).
The treaty was signed on 27 May 1952 by Belgium, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, France, Italy, and West Germany. Article 129 of the treaty allows for additional countries to join the community.
By 1954, four out of the six signatories had ratified the treaty. Ratification by France and Italy was not completed, after the French National Assembly voted for indefinite postponement of the process in 1954.{{Cite web |title=Getting Serious about European Defence Integration: The European Defence Community Precedent |url=https://alcideproject.eu/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/ALCIDE-Policy-Brief.pdf |website=alcideproject.eu}} The treaty was never formally annulled and ratification remains technically open for completion.{{Cite journal|url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eulj.12531|title=European defence integration after Trump's re-election: A proposal to revive the European Defense Community Treaty and its legal feasibility|first=Federico|last=Fabbrini|journal=European Law Journal|date=2024 |volume=n/a|issue=n/a|via=Wiley Online Library|doi=10.1111/eulj.12531}} Recent geopolitical developments—including the Russian invasion of Ukraine in 2022 and the re-election of U.S. President Donald Trump in 2024—have renewed interest in the treaty. On 3 April 2025, a bill to ratify the EDC was introduced in both chambers of the Italian Parliament.{{Cite web|url=https://www.senato.it/leg/19/BGT/Schede/Ddliter/59054.htm|title=Parlamento Italiano - Disegno di legge C. 2342 - 19ª Legislatura|website=www.senato.it}}{{Cite web|url=https://podcasts.apple.com/no/podcast/policy-voices-getting-serious-about-european-defence/id958963646?i=1000703979473&l=nb|title=Policy Voices | Getting serious about European defence integration|website=Apple Podcasts}}.
Provisions
The EDC would entail a unified defence, divided into national components, funded by a common budget, common arms, centralized military procurement, and institutions.
Diagram showing the functioning of the institutions outlined in the treaty, the placing of the European Defence Forces at the disposal of the Community, and the link between the EDC and the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO, with reference to this organisation's Supreme Allied Commander Europe and Council):
=Preamble=
Establishes the intent to strengthen peace and unity in Europe, ensure security, and lay the groundwork for eventual political federation.
= Title I – Fundamental Provisions=
==Chapter I – The European Defence Community==
Articles 1–7: Legal foundation, aims, principles (e.g., peaceful purpose, equal treatment, NATO cooperation), juridical personality.
==Chapter II – The European Defence Forces==
Articles 8–12: Establishment of integrated armed forces; restrictions and exceptions for national forces (e.g., police, UN missions, royal guards).
=Title II – Institutions of the Community=
==Chapter I – General Provisions==
Articles 13–20: Overview of the four institutions: Council of Ministers, Commissariat, Assembly, Court of Justice. Defines legal powers and responsibilities.
==Chapter II – The Council of Ministers==
Articles 21–30: Composition, voting rules, responsibilities in policy, defense, finance, and inter-institutional cooperation.
==Chapter III – The Commissariat==
Articles 31–40: Executive arm of the Community, responsible for administration, budget execution, operational command, and reporting.
==Chapter IV – The Assembly==
Articles 41–48: Legislative and supervisory body; representatives from member states; powers include approval of budget and motions of censure.
==Chapter V – The Court of Justice==
Articles 49–60: Judicial authority to interpret and ensure uniform application of the treaty; jurisdiction over institutions and member states.
=Title III – The Military Organization of the Community=
Articles 61–71: Details the military command structure, staff organization, training standards, and integration procedures.
=Title IV – Financial Provisions=
Articles 72–84: Establishes Community budget, financial contributions, auditing, and control of expenditures.
=Title V – General Obligations of Member States=
Articles 85–90: Obligations regarding treaty compliance, cooperation, enforcement of Community decisions, and prohibition of conflicting agreements.
=Title VI – Relations with Other Organizations=
Articles 91–95: Outlines relations with NATO, the UN, and other international organizations to ensure coordination and consistency.
=Title VII – Personnel of the Community=
Articles 96–104: Legal status, discipline, and rights of military and civilian personnel under the Community's jurisdiction.
=Title VIII – Property and Procurement=
Articles 105–113: Rules on armaments, shared resources, procurement procedures, and allocation of infrastructure.
=Title IX – Transitional and Special Provisions=
Articles 114–120: Transitional arrangements for integrating national forces and institutions; special protocols for initial phases.
=Title X – Final Provisions=
Articles 121–132:
- Signature and Ratification: Procedures for treaty adoption.
- Entry into Force: Conditions for the treaty to become active.
- Amendment Procedures
- Accession of New States
- Authentic Texts
=Annexes and Protocols=
- Military Protocol
- Financial Protocol
- Protocol on Jurisdiction
- Convention on the Status of Forces
- Protocols related to NATO and the UN
Ratification
File:EDC ratification 2025.svg
The table below summarizes the status of ratification of the treaty by the signatory states. By 1954 4 states had completed ratification, with the process in the remaining 2 states on hold.
class="wikitable" style="white-space:nowrap"
|+ National ratification processes !scope="col"| Signatory !scope="col" class="unsortable" | Institution !scope="col"| Date !scope="col" class="unsortable" | File:Symbol thumbs up.svg !scope="col" class="unsortable" | File:Symbol thumbs down.svg !scope="col" class="unsortable" | AB !scope="col"| Deposited !scope="col" class="unsortable" style="width:2em" | {{abbr|Ref.|Reference}} |
rowspan="2" style="background:#F0F0F0" | {{flag|Belgium}}
| style="background:#76FF7A" | Senate | style="background:#76FF7A" | 12 March 1954 | style="background:#76FF7A; text-align:center" | 125 | style="background:#76FF7A; text-align:center" | 40 | style="background:#76FF7A; text-align:center" | 2 | style="background:#76FF7A; text-align:center" | ? |
style="background:#76FF7A" | Chamber of Representatives
| style="background:#76FF7A" | 26 November 1953 | style="background:#76FF7A; text-align:center" | 148 | style="background:#76FF7A; text-align:center" | 49 | style="background:#76FF7A; text-align:center" | 3 | style="background:#76FF7A; text-align:center" | ? |
rowspan="2" style="background:#F0F0F0; text-align:left" | {{flag|France}}
| | style="text-align:center" | | style="text-align:center" | | style="text-align:center" | | style="text-align:center" | ! |
Council of the Republic
| | | | | ! |
rowspan="2" style="background:#F0F0F0; text-align:left" | {{flag|West Germany}}
| style="background:#76FF7A" | Federal Diet | style="background:#76FF7A" | 19 March 1953 | style="background:#76FF7A; text-align:center" | 224 | style="background:#76FF7A; text-align:center" | 165 | style="background:#76FF7A; text-align:center" | ? | style="background:#76FF7A; text-align:center" | ? |
style="background:#76FF7A" | Federal Council
| style="background:#76FF7A" | 15 May 1953 | style="background:#76FF7A; text-align:center" | ? | style="background:#76FF7A; text-align:center" | ? | style="background:#76FF7A; text-align:center" | ? | style="background:#76FF7A; text-align:center" | ? |
rowspan="2" style="background:#F0F0F0" | {{flag|Italy}}
| Senate | ? | | | | |
Chamber of Deputies
| ? | | | | |
style="background:#F0F0F0" | {{flag|Luxembourg}}
| style="background:#76FF7A" | Chamber of Deputies | style="background:#76FF7A" | 7 April 1954 | style="background:#76FF7A; text-align:center" | 47 | style="background:#76FF7A; text-align:center" | 3 | style="background:#76FF7A; text-align:center" | 1 | style="background:#76FF7A; text-align:center" | ? ! The European Defence Community: Problems of Ratification by John W. Young. |
rowspan="2" style="background:#F0F0F0" | {{flag|Netherlands}}
| style="background:#76FF7A" | House of Representatives | style="background:#76FF7A" | 23 July 1953 | style="background:#76FF7A; text-align:center"| 75 | style="background:#76FF7A; text-align:center" |11 | style="background:#76FF7A; text-align:center" |0 | style="background:#76FF7A; text-align:center" | ? |
style="background:#76FF7A" | Senate
| style="background:#76FF7A" | 20 January 1954 |style="background:#76FF7A; text-align:center"| 36 |style="background:#76FF7A; text-align:center" | 4 | style="background:#76FF7A; text-align:center" | 10 | style="background:#76FF7A; text-align:center" | ? |
==Potential resumption of ratification procedure==
Recent geopolitical developments—including the Russian invasion of Ukraine in 2022 and the re-election of U.S. President Donald Trump in 2024—have renewed interest in the treaty. A 2024 article by Professor Federico Fabbrini at Dublin City University, as well as a 2025 study led by former French defence minister Sylvie Goulard , have found that it is still legally feasible for Italy and France to ratify the treaty, thereby bringing it into force. This suggests that the ratification process that halted in 1954, may proceed.
==Status in France==
On 30 August 1954, the French National Assembly voted 264 against, 319 in favour and 31 abstentions on a motion for indefinite postponement of ratification.
By the time of the vote, concerns about a future conflict faded with the death of Joseph Stalin and the end of the Korean War. Concomitant to these fears were a severe disjuncture between the original Pleven Plan of 1950 and the one defeated in 1954. Divergences included military integration at the division rather than battalion level and a change in the command structure putting NATO's Supreme Allied Commander Europe (SACEUR) in charge of EDC operational capabilities. The reasons that led to the failed ratification of the Treaty were twofold, concerning major changes in the international scene, as well as domestic problems of the French Fourth Republic.{{Cite journal|title=The European Defense Community in the French National Assembly: A Roll Call Analysis|journal=Comparative Politics|volume=2}} There were Gaullist fears that the EDC threatened France's national sovereignty, constitutional concerns about the indivisibility of the French Republic, and fears about West Germany's remilitarization. French Communists opposed a plan tying France to the capitalist United States and setting it in opposition to the Communist bloc. Other legislators worried about the absence of the United Kingdom.
The Prime Minister, Pierre Mendès-France, tried to placate the treaty's detractors by attempting to ratify additional protocols with the other signatory states. These included the sole integration of covering forces, or in other words, those deployed within West Germany, as well as the implementation of greater national autonomy in regard to budgetary and other administrative questions. Despite the central role for France, the EDC plan collapsed when it failed to obtain ratification in the French Parliament.
==Status in Italy==
The original ratification process in Italy was halted after the French National Assembly voted for indefinite postponement.
After the Russian invasion of Ukraine in 2022 and the re-election of US President Trump in 2024, the treaty has regained interest.
On 3 April 3 2025, deputy Mauro Del Barba (Italia Viva – Centro – Renew Europe) tabled a bill to ratify the treaty in both chambers of Parliament. As of now, the bill is still under review and has not yet been assigned to a specific committee for further consideration.{{Cite web|url=https://www.ilriformista.it/europa-e-difesa-von-der-leyen-fa-la-comandante-sanchez-illude-perche-litalia-dovrebbe-riavviare-la-ratifica-della-ced-462838/|title=Europa e Difesa: von der Leyen fa la comandante, Sanchez illude. Perché l'Italia dovrebbe riavviare la ratifica della Ced|date=9 April 2025|website=Il Riformista}}{{Cite web|url=https://torinocronaca.it/news/torino/495990/italia-viva-piemonte-inizia-il-tesseramento-2025-con-focus-sull-europa-e-riforme-strategiche.html|title=Italia Viva Piemonte: inizia il tesseramento 2025 con focus sull'Europa e riforme strategiche|first=Laura|last=Chiola|date=14 April 2025|website=torinocronaca.it}}
History
{{Further|History of the Common Security and Defence Policy}}
{{History of the European Union}}
=Background=
During the late 1940s, the divisions created by the Cold War were becoming evident. The United States looked with suspicion at the growing power of the USSR and European states felt vulnerable, fearing a possible Soviet occupation. In this climate of mistrust and suspicion, the United States considered the rearmament of West Germany as a possible solution to enhance the security of Europe and of the whole Western bloc.{{Cite book|title=The Rise and Fall of the European Defence Community: Anglo-American Relations and the Crisis of European Defense, 1950–55|last=Ruane|first=Kevin|year=2000|pages=1, 2}}
In August 1950, Winston Churchill proposed the creation of a common European army, including German soldiers, in front of the Council of Europe:
{{Blockquote|“We should make a gesture of practical and constructive guidance by declaring ourselves in favour of the immediate creation of a European Army under a unified command, and in which we should all bear a worthy and honourable part.”|Winston Churchill|speech at the Council of Europe 1950{{cite web|url=https://www.cvce.eu/en/obj/address_given_by_winston_churchill_to_the_council_of_europe_strasbourg_11_august_1950-en-ed9e513b-af3b-47a0-b03c-8335a7aa237d.html |title=Address given by Winston Churchill to the Council of Europe (Strasbourg, 11 August 1950) |date=2013-05-14 |language=en |access-date=2021-07-03}}}}
The Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe subsequently adopted the resolution put forward by the United Kingdom and officially endorsed the idea:
{{Blockquote|“The Assembly, in order to express its devotion to the maintenance of peace and its resolve to sustain the action of the Security Council of the United Nations in defence of peaceful peoples against aggression, calls for the immediate creation of a unified European Army subject to proper European democratic control and acting in full co-operation with the United States and Canada.”|Resolution of the Council of Europe 1950}}
In September 1950, Dean Acheson, under a cable submitted by High Commissioner John J. McCloy, proposed a new plan to the European states; the American plan, called package, sought to enhance NATO's defense structure, creating 12 West German divisions. However, after the destruction that Germany had caused during World War II, European countries, in particular France, were not ready to see the reconstruction of the German military.{{Cite book|title=The Rise and Fall of the European Defence Community: Anglo-American Relations and the Crisis of European Defense, 1950–55|last=Ruane|first=Kevin|year=2000|pages=4}} Finding themselves in the midst of the two superpowers, they looked at this situation as a possibility to enhance the process of integrating Europe, trying to obviate the loss of military influence caused by the new bipolar order and thus supported a common army.{{Cite journal|title=Background for the European Defence Community|journal=Political Science Quarterly|volume=68}}
=1950-1951: Launch of the Pleven Plan=
{{multiple image
| total_width = 320
| image1 = Jean Monnet.jpg
| image2 = René Pleven.jpg
| footer = Jean Monnet (l.) and René Pleven
}}
The treaty was initiated by the Pleven plan, proposed in 1950 by then French Prime Minister René Pleven in response to the American call for the rearmament of West Germany. The formation of a pan-European defence architecture, as an alternative to West Germany's proposed accession to NATO, was meant to harness the German military potential in case of conflict with the Soviet bloc. Just as the Schuman Plan was designed to end the risk of Germany having the economic power on its own to make war again, the Pleven Plan and EDC were meant to prevent the military possibility of Germany's making war again.
On 24 October 1950, France's Prime Minister René Pleven proposed a new plan, which took his name although it was drafted mainly by Jean Monnet, that aimed to create a supranational European army. With this project, France tried to satisfy America's demands, avoiding, at the same time, the creation of German divisions, and thus the rearmament of Germany.{{Cite book|title=The Rise and Fall of the European Defence Community: Anglo-American Relations and the Crisis of European Defense, 1950–55|last=Ruane|first=Kevin|year=2000|pages=4, 5}}Pierre Guillen, "France and the Defence of Western Europe: From the Brussels Pact (March 1948) to the Pleven Plan (October 1950)." in The Western Security Community: Common Problems and Conflicting Interests during the Foundation Phase of the North Atlantic Alliance, ed. Norbert Wigershaus and Roland G. Foerster (1993), pp. 125–48.
{{Blockquote|“Confident as it is that Europe’s destiny lies in peace and convinced that all the peoples of Europe need a sense of collective security, the French Government proposes […] the creation, for the purposes of common defence, of a European army tied to the political institutions of a united Europe.”|René Pleven|speech at the French Parliament 1950{{cite web|url=https://www.cvce.eu/content/publication/1997/10/13/4a3f4499-daf1-44c1-b313-212b31cad878/publishable_en.pdf|title=Statement by René Pleven on the establishment of a European army (24 October 1950)|date=1950-10-24|access-date=2021-07-04|publisher=Journal officiel de la République française. Débats Parlementaires. Assemblée nationale. 10.1950. Paris: Imprimerie nationale. "Déclaration du Gouverneur français René Pleven le 24 octobre 1950", p. 7118-7119.}}}}
The EDC was to include West Germany, France, Italy, and the Benelux countries. The United States would be excluded. It was a competitor to NATO (in which the US played the dominant role), with France playing the dominant role. Just as the Schuman Plan was designed to end the risk of Germany having the economic power to make war again, the Pleven Plan and EDC were meant to prevent the same possibility. Britain approved of the plan in principle, but agreed to join only if the supranational element was decreased.Alex May, Britain and Europe since 1945 (1999) pp. 18–34.
According to the Pleven Plan, the European Army was supposed to be composed of military units from the member states, and directed by a council of the member states’ ministers. Although with some doubts and hesitation, the United States and the six members of the ECSC approved the Pleven Plan in principle.
=1951-1952: Negotiations and signing=
File:Signing of the EDC treaty.jpg speaking at the signing ceremony in the French foreign ministry's Salon de l'Horloge on 27 May 1952.]]
The initial approval of the Pleven Plan led the way to the Paris Conference, launched in February 1951, where it was negotiated the structure of the supranational army.
France feared the loss of national sovereignty in security and defense, and thus a truly supranational European Army could not be tolerated by Paris.{{Cite book|title = European Security and Defense Policy: From Taboo to a Spearhead of EU Foreign Policy|last = Keukeleire|first = Stephan|year = 2009|pages = 52–53}} However, because of the strong American interest in a West German army, a draft agreement for a modified Pleven Plan, renamed the European Defense Community (EDC), was ready in May 1952, with French support.
On 27 May 1952 the foreign ministers of the six 'inner' countries of European integration signed the treaty:{{Cite book|title=The Rise and Fall of the European Defence Community: Anglo-American Relations and the Crisis of European Defense, 1950-55|last=Ruane|first=Kevin|year=2000|pages=15}}
- Belgium: Paul Van Zeeland
- France: Robert Schuman
- Italy: Alcide De Gasperi
- Luxembourg: Joseph Bech
- Netherlands: Dirk Stikker
- West Germany: Konrad Adenauer
A European Political Community (EPC) was proposed in 1952 as a combination of the existing European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC) and the proposed European Defence Community (EDC). A draft EPC treaty, as drawn up by the ECSC assembly (now the European Parliament), would have seen a directly elected assembly ("the Peoples’ Chamber"), a senate appointed by national parliaments and a supranational executive accountable to the parliament.
=1953-1954: Partial ratification=
In 1953 and 1954, Belgium, Luxembourg, the Netherlands and West Germany ratified the treaty.
=1954-present: Prolonged suspension of French and Italian ratification=
Following the French National Assembly's vote to indefinitely postpone ratification in 1954, Italian ratification was also put on hold.
This resulted in the
- Abandonment of the European Political Community idea.Richard T. Griffiths Europe's first constitution: the European Political Community, 1952–1954 in Stephen Martin, editor. The Construction of Europe: Essays in Honour of Emile Noël 19 (1994){{Cite web |date=2016-08-07 |title=The European Political Community |url=https://www.cvce.eu/obj/the_european_political_community-en-8b63810a-e5bd-4979-9d27-9a21c056fc8d.html |access-date=2025-04-26 |website=CVCE.EU by UNI.LU |language=en}}
- The London and Paris Conferences provided for West Germany's accession to NATO{{Cite journal |last=Joffe |first=Josef |date=1984 |title=Europe's American Pacifier |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/1148355 |journal=Foreign Policy |issue=54 |pages=64–82 |doi=10.2307/1148355 |jstor=1148355 |issn=0015-7228}} and the Western European Union (WEU), the latter of which was a transformed version of the pre-existing Western Union.
- Meeting of European leaders in the Messina Conference in 1955, where they established the Spaak Committee which would pave the way for the creation of the European Economic Community (EEC). The EEC member states tried to create foreign policy cooperation in the De Gaulle-sponsored Fouchet Plan (1959–1962). European foreign policy was finally established during the third attempt with the European Political Cooperation (EPC) (1970). This became the predecessor of the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP). Today the European Union and NATO, and formerly also the Western European Union, all carry out some of the functions which was envisaged for the EDC, although none approach the degree of supranational military control that the EDC would have provided for.
{{Structural evolution of the European Union}}
See also
{{Portal|European Union}}
References
Further reading
- Fursdon, Edward. The European Defence Community: A History (1980), the standard history [https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=k5euCwAAQBAJ online]
- {{cite book | author=Judt, Tony | title=Postwar: A History of Europe Since 1945 | publisher=Penguin Press | year=2005 | isbn=978-1-59420-065-6 | url-access=registration | url=https://archive.org/details/postwarhistoryof00judt }}
- Ruane, Kevin. The Rise and Fall of the European Defence Community: Anglo-American Relations and the Crisis of European Defense, 1950–55 Palgrave, 2000. 252 pp.
- Guillen, Pierre. "France and the Defence of Western Europe: From the Brussels Pact (March 1948) to the Pleven Plan (October 1950)." in The Western Security Community: Common Problems and Conflicting Interests during the Foundation Phase of the North Atlantic Alliance, ed. Norbert Wigershaus and Roland G. Foerster (Oxford UP, 1993), pp 125–48.
- {{cite book |last1=Van der Harst |first1=J. |title=The Atlantic Priority: Defence Policy of the Netherlands at the Time of the European Defence Community |date=2003 |publisher=European Press Academic Publishing |location=Florence |isbn=8883980220}}
- {{cite book |last1=Weigall |first1=David |editor1-last=Stirk |editor1-first=Peter Michael Robert |editor2-last=Willis |editor2-first=David |title=Shaping Postwar Europe: European Unity and Disunity, 1945-1957 |date=1991 |publisher=Pinter |location=London |isbn=0-86187-161-8 |pages=90–99 |chapter=British perceptions of the European Defence Community}}
- {{cite book |last1=Varsori |first1=Antonio |editor1-last=Stirk |editor1-first=Peter Michael Robert |editor2-last=Willis |editor2-first=David |title=Shaping Postwar Europe: European Unity and Disunity, 1945-1957 |date=1991 |publisher=Pinter |location=London |isbn=0-86187-161-8 |pages=100–111 |chapter=Italy and the European Defence Community: 1950-54}}
External links
- [http://aei.pitt.edu/5201/1/5201.pdf EDC Treaty (unofficial translation) see pg 2]
- [https://www.cvce.eu/en/education/unit-content/-/unit/803b2430-7d1c-4e7b-9101-47415702fc8e/f631cc13-af3d-43dd-8965-bd15e658155b EDC information on European Navigation]
- [https://alcideproject.eu Activating The Law Creatively To Integrate Defense In Europe (ALCIDE) Project], Dublin City University
- EUROPEAN ARMY: De Gaulle's Alternative [https://web.archive.org/web/20081222122642/http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,817685,00.html De Gaulle's Alternative - TIME]
- Archival material concerning the EDC can be consulted at the [http://www.eui.eu/Research/HistoricalArchivesOfEU/Index.aspx Historical Archives of the European Union] in Florence.
{{EU treaties and declarations}}
{{Common Security and Defence Policy}}
{{Authority control}}
Category:Military history of the European Union
Category:Unratified treaties of the European Union
Category:1950 in the European Economic Community
Category:1952 in the European Economic Community
Category:20th-century military alliances
Category:International military organizations
Category:Military alliances involving France
Category:Military alliances involving Luxembourg
Category:Military alliances involving Belgium
Category:Military alliances involving the Netherlands
Category:Military alliances involving Italy
Category:Cold War military history of Belgium
Category:Cold War military history of France
Category:1950 in international relations