user:Namelessposter

{{GA user topicon

| article_name = Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me

| date = 20 April 2025

}}

{{DYK user topicon

| article_name = François Guiter

| date = 6 March 2025

| icon = Symbol question.svg

}}

{{DYK user topicon

| article_name = John Hogan (motorsport executive)

| date = 10 March 2025

| icon = Symbol question.svg

}}

{{DYK user topicon

| article_name = Luka Dončić–Anthony Davis trade

| date = 11 April 2025

| icon = Symbol question.svg

}}

{{DYK user topicon

| article_name = Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me

| date = 20 May 2025

| icon = Symbol question.svg

}}

I like editing Formula One pages, although I often find myself editing pages about movies. Some contributions are listed below.

{{Userboxtop|About Me

}}

{{User Featured Article Candidate|Mario Andretti}}

{{User Good Article|Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me}}

{{User DYK|4}}

{{User WP:F1}}

{{Userbox Russell}}

{{User:RaygunShaun/Userboxes/MulhollandDr}}

{{User:UBX/colorization against}}

{{Userbox

| border-c = #E1000F

| border-s = 1

| id-c = #000091

| id-s = 12

| id-fc = #FFFFFF

| id-op =

| info-c = #FFFFFF

| info-s = 8

| info-fc = #E1000F

| info-lh = 1.2em

| info-op =

| id = RB

| info = This user enjoys the films of Robert Bresson, including the color ones.

}}

{{User Presbyuserbox}}

{{User wikipedia/Extended confirmed}}

{{Userboxbottom}}

What I'm working on

  • Sandbox: Number one driver (motor racing concept)
  • Sandbox2: General testing

Formula One

= Created =

= Substantially rewrote =

= Edited =

Films

I think film plot summaries should cover key themes and character arcs, not just details. My rule of thumb is that if a fact is implied, it goes in the synopsis, like Diary of a Country Priest; a minimalist like Robert Bresson is nearly incomprehensible unless you affirmatively make certain connections. If it's subtext or allusive, it goes in the analysis/themes section, like Pickpocket or Megalopolis. Obviously, this is a grey area and reasonable people can disagree. I find that using efn footnotes helps bridge the gap.

= Major contributions =

= Multiple contributions =

= Wrote or revised synopses =

= Other contributions =

Other