user talk:Danners430

{{User:MiszaBot/config

| algo = old(7d)

| archive = User talk:Danners430/Archive %(counter)d

| counter = 3

| maxarchivesize = 50T

| archiveheader = {{Automatic archive navigator}}

| minthreadstoarchive = 1

| minthreadsleft = 1

}}{{Talk header|search=yes|arpol=yes|wp=no|disclaimer=no|bottom=yes||}}

{{Userboxtop|}}

{{User:Ritchie333/Userbox ES}}

{{User leaves edit summaries}}

{{Userboxbreak}}

{{UserboxCOI |1=Strathspey Railway (preserved)}}

{{UserboxCOI |1=North Yorkshire Moors Railway |2=List of rolling stock preserved on the North Yorkshire Moors Railway}}

{{Userboxbottom}}

{{Wikipedians open to trout slapping}}

SWR 159102 scrapped

I acknowledge there was maybe not sufficient knowledge / evidence of the final carriage of doomed BR Class 159 unit 159102 being broken up, but I have seen photos - they are in a private Facebook group so I am unsure how to forward them to be used as part of an edit for the relevant section, thanks OmniDekka (talk) 20:44, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

:It’s not proof that’s needed, but verifiable and reliable sources. A photo on a private Facebook group is neither of those. Danners430 (talk) 05:34, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

User:Skywatcher68

Can you please reason with this user, I explained multiple times about the deletion of gallery sections in locomotive articles, but he refuses to listen. Because I've seen you explained it in your edit summaries when you deleted the gallery sections in locomotive articles. Maybe you can do a better Job at explaining it to him. Because I don’t think I can do it. 5.42.221.141 (talk) 17:05, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

:I do not wish to get involved in disputes I’m not a part of. The policy that applies is WP:GALLERY which explains when galleries of photos are appropriate and when they are not. Danners430 (talk) 17:15, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

I completely understand, he has since reported me and now it's get tiny to the point were I can't defend myself. 5.42.221.141 (talk) 17:19, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

:I will say that the report is wholly justified as it looks like you broke WP:3RR instead of discussing on the talk page. If you’re reverted, you should discuss the change on the talk page instead of edit warring. I haven’t yet had to discuss a gallery removal, but that’s what the correct course of action would be if I did have an edit reverted. Danners430 (talk) 18:05, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

Request for permissions

{{Admin help|answered=yes}}

There’s a pretty serious backlog of requests for permissions specifically for Pending Changes Reviewer - I’ve personally had a request open for 20 days… is it possible to have someone look at the backlog? Many thanks :) Danners430 (talk) 11:20, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

: Looks like your request was granted, and admins are actively working on the backlog. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 15:10, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

::Many thanks :D

::I don’t usually like to poke like that, as we’re all volunteers and have real lives… but I saw how long the backlog was starting to get! Danners430 (talk) 15:12, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

:::It helps to poke! Often you'll see people post about backlogs at WP:AN. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 15:16, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

::::True - but when it ain’t urgent like this the template seems like the most gentle way to poke :D Danners430 (talk) 15:22, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted

File:Wikipedia Reviewer.svg

Hello. Your account has been granted the "{{mono|pending changes reviewer}}" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

Katietalk 14:30, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

787 deliveries edit

Howdy! Yeah I try to leave citations everywhere but that table didn't seem to have anywhere suitable for it to go. The sources included the GE press release from 2024 https://www.geaerospace.com/news/press-releases/british-airways-orders-first-genx-engines-new-787-dreamliners along with a bunch of aviation news articles. BA had ordered 18 781s initially and so the reference to 6 in that press release covers the 12 deliveries pending off the original order, then there was the additional 24 ordered recently. Joeykins82 (talk) 16:35, 20 June 2025 (UTC)

:The problem with that source is that all it really says is BA have placed an order for GENx engines - obviously that means they’ve ordered some 787s fitted with those engines, but it doesn’t say which aircraft those will be, when deliveries will start etc. It doesn’t say that the next 787 will be BA’s last with RR engines, nor how many GE-powered 787s there will be - especially given airlines often have a few spare engines. Danners430 (talk) 17:57, 20 June 2025 (UTC)