user talk:Fidjeri

File:Control copyright icon.svg Hello Fidjeri! While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

• Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (") and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners. {{#ifeq: | 1 |}}
• Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
• Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file's elegibility.
• Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Cocobb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 14:52, 4 June 2024 (UTC)

File:Information.svg Hello, I'm Peloneous. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, :Doha, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. I have also removed the identical statement added to 2024 Summer Olympics whose citation was to a non-existent page on the Qatar Tourism website. Thank you.

Hello, I partially reverted your edits to Salman of Saudi Arabia as you added links to things that should generally not be linked; countries, especially common ones such as the ones you linked (China, Japan, Pakistan, etc.) should generally not be linked to, as described in MOS:OL, as well as dates, including the link you added to 2015. There is a reason those pages were not linked to before, and please take a look at the MOS conventions on what generally should and should not be linked. Thanks. Flemmish Nietzsche (talk) 23:26, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

File:Information orange.svg Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in :Zamzam Well. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. See MOS:OVERLINK. Please do not link country names. You have been warned about this previously. CodeTalker (talk) 17:34, 15 July 2024 (UTC)

File:Information.svg Hello, I'm Frost. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to :Qatari involvement in higher education in the United States have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. {{PAGENAME}} Frost 11:53, 8 October 2024 (UTC)

File:Information.svg Hi Fidjeri! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of an article several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Justjourney (talk | contribs) 16:48, 3 May 2025 (UTC)

:Hi Justjourney, thank you for your messege and kind approach. I am aware of the policy, however from what comes to my mind at the moment, reversions i did, were on article that information i wrote was wrongly deleted time and again. Sometime by a user that simply used an ip, not even explaining why he deleted information. My guess is, he didn't like what is written.

:I do my best to follow the rules, each reversion i did, is explained, sourced and backed with facts. I understand the point you are making. Having said that, i hope you approached some of those who deleted information, and explained them the policy. Once again i thank you for your messege, i hope you understood my point too. I will do my best to follow policy in the future. Fidjeri (talk) 18:47, 3 May 2025 (UTC)

{{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{tl|Ctopics/aware}} template.

Hello, Fidjeri,

Thank you for creating Sana Yousuf.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

{{Quote|1=Good start, however the page is not fully meeting neutrality and other WP guidelines. To overpass one event notability issue you have to work more on this page and demonstrate a lasting general notability}}

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Old-AgedKid}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Old-AgedKid (talk) 12:47, 3 June 2025 (UTC)