user talk:Pegship#Please take a look, it's about books

:Category:United Kingdom museum stubs has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. PearlyGigs (talk) 20:33, 29 June 2024 (UTC)

Hi! I've just made the {{cl|Exoristinae stubs|Exoristinae subcategory}} stub templates, but I can't find where in the stub type list these would go in. Do you know? Suntooooth, it/he (talk/contribs) 21:08, 12 July 2024 (UTC)

:Looks like their parent cat, {{cl|Tachinidae stubs}} is under a few sub-headings of insect stubs in the science section. Let me know if you have trouble finding it! Her Pegship (?) 21:19, 12 July 2024 (UTC)

::Got it, thanks! :] Suntooooth, it/he (talk/contribs) 21:33, 12 July 2024 (UTC)

30px

The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sua_(_Folk_music)&redirect=no Sua ( Folk music)] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at {{slink|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 14#Sua ( Folk music)}} until a consensus is reached. 1234qwer1234qwer4 17:14, 14 September 2024 (UTC)

File:Information.svg Hello, Pegship. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Destination Moon (short story), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:07, 13 October 2024 (UTC)

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this [https://wikimediafoundation.limesurvey.net/294789?lang=en anonymous survey].

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:22, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey [https://wikimediafoundation.limesurvey.net/294789?lang=en here].

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:17, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

File:Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article :The Jackrabbit Factor has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced and unimproved almost 15 years. No reliable sources. Run of the mill, self-published self-help book. Author not notable. Not enough information to merge or redirect anywhere.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bearian (talk) 13:54, 7 December 2024 (UTC)

Hi! Coming with a question after checking on the Kevin Huezo

page. I saw that a while back you replaced a link that formerly held a player profile (and now serves as a redirect to the league’s main page) with the league’s main page. This new page doesn’t have anything specific about the player.

I’m leaning toward reverting the link (and marking it as a dead link on the page as it was before), but I’m curious for your opinion before I do so. I’m not immediately sure if there are guidelines on which link should be used in this scenario, and I figured you might have some knowledge. Thanks! Michaelwallace22 (talk) 04:18, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

:Hi there - As far as I recall, I replaced the link just for the sake of avoiding a redlink, hoping someone would later update it with a link more relevant to the player. Feel free to edit as you wish! Her Pegship (?) 17:51, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

File:Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article :Muhammad Subuh Foundation has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced and unimproved almost 15 years. Run of the mill, very small, private foundation. Not enough information to merge, and a redirect would be redundant. Borderline religious Spam.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bearian (talk) 20:26, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

File:Ambox warning blue.svg Thanks for uploading :File:Belphegorpbk.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:08, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

I wasn't sure where to post this, but I'd still like your opinion on something. Should {{t|Sivagangai-geo-stub}} be renamed to {{t|Sivaganga-geo-stub}}? Nearly everything else, such as categories and articles, refers to the district as "Sivaganga". What do you think? - OpalYosutebito (talk) 18:59, 3 February 2025 (UTC)

:I agree. I think that, since it doesn't have a category yet, the template rename should be posted at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion. Thanks for checking! Her Pegship (?) 20:47, 3 February 2025 (UTC)

::Nah, I think it should be at WP:Requested moves. There are templates that have been requested there - OpalYosutebito (talk) 18:29, 24 February 2025 (UTC)

:::Have at it. I've always been fuzzy on the "foo for discussion/renaming/deletion" convesrations. Cheers! Her Pegship (?) 22:08, 24 February 2025 (UTC)

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of a group of Wikipedians to better understand their experiences! We are also looking to interview some survey respondents in more detail, and you will be eligible to receive a thank-you gift for the completion of an interview. The outcomes of this research will shape future work designed to improve on-wiki experiences.

We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this [https://wikimedia.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_bwKum9LHQGL5bWS survey], which shouldn’t take more than 2-3 minutes. You may view its privacy statement here. Please contact me if you have any questions or concerns. Kind regards, Sam Walton (talk) 16:34, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

:Template:Jieyang-geo-stub has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the stub template guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the template's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. OpalYosutebito (talk) 17:57, 18 March 2025 (UTC)

:Template:Guangzhou-geo-stub has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the stub template guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the template's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. OpalYosutebito (talk) 17:59, 18 March 2025 (UTC)

:Template:Heyuan-geo-stub has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the stub template guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the template's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. OpalYosutebito (talk) 18:01, 18 March 2025 (UTC)

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 March 18 § Chinese geography stub templates for deletion on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. jlwoodwa (talk) 18:46, 18 March 2025 (UTC)

File:Information icon4.svg

Hello, Pegship. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Destination Moon".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply {{edit|Draft:Destination Moon (short story)|edit the submission}}, and remove the {{tlc|db-afc}}, {{tlc|db-draft}}, or {{tlc|db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions here. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 16:26, 7 May 2025 (UTC)