vertex-transitive graph

{{Short description|Graph where all pairs of vertices are automorphic}}

{{Graph families defined by their automorphisms}}

In the mathematical field of graph theory, an automorphism is a permutation of the vertices such that edges are mapped to edges and non-edges are mapped to non-edges. A graph is a vertex-transitive graph if, given any two vertices {{math|v{{sub|1}}}} and {{math|v{{sub|2}}}} of {{mvar|G}}, there is an automorphism {{math|f}} such that

:f(v_1) = v_2.\

In other words, a graph is vertex-transitive if its automorphism group acts transitively on its vertices.{{citation|first1=Chris|last1=Godsil|authorlink1=Chris Godsil|first2=Gordon|last2=Royle|authorlink2=Gordon Royle|title=Algebraic Graph Theory|series=Graduate Texts in Mathematics|volume=207|publisher=Springer |orig-year=2001 |isbn=978-1-4613-0163-9 |year=2013|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=GeSPBAAAQBAJ }}. A graph is vertex-transitive if and only if its graph complement is, since the group actions are identical.

Every symmetric graph without isolated vertices is vertex-transitive, and every vertex-transitive graph is regular. However, not all vertex-transitive graphs are symmetric (for example, the edges of the truncated tetrahedron), and not all regular graphs are vertex-transitive (for example, the Frucht graph and Tietze's graph).

Finite examples

File:Tuncated tetrahedral graph.png form a vertex-transitive graph (also a Cayley graph) which is not symmetric.]]

Finite vertex-transitive graphs include the symmetric graphs (such as the Petersen graph, the Heawood graph and the vertices and edges of the Platonic solids). The finite Cayley graphs (such as cube-connected cycles) are also vertex-transitive, as are the vertices and edges of the Archimedean solids (though only two of these are symmetric). Potočnik, Spiga and Verret have constructed a census of all connected cubic vertex-transitive graphs on at most 1280 vertices.{{citation|title=Cubic vertex-transitive graphs on up to 1280 vertices|author1=Potočnik P., Spiga P. |author2=Verret G. |name-list-style=amp |journal=Journal of Symbolic Computation |volume = 50 | year = 2013|pages = 465–477|doi=10.1016/j.jsc.2012.09.002|arxiv=1201.5317|s2cid=26705221 }}.

Although every Cayley graph is vertex-transitive, there exist other vertex-transitive graphs that are not Cayley graphs. The most famous example is the Petersen graph, but others can be constructed including the line graphs of edge-transitive non-bipartite graphs with odd vertex degrees.{{citation

| last1 = Lauri | first1 = Josef

| last2 = Scapellato | first2 = Raffaele

| isbn = 0-521-82151-7

| mr = 1971819

| page = 44

| publisher = Cambridge University Press

| series = London Mathematical Society Student Texts

| title = Topics in graph automorphisms and reconstruction

| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=hsymFm0E0uIC&pg=PA44

| volume = 54

| year = 2003}}. Lauri and Scapelleto credit this construction to Mark Watkins.

Properties

The edge-connectivity of a connected vertex-transitive graph is equal to the degree d, while the vertex-connectivity will be at least 2(d + 1)/3.

If the degree is 4 or less, or the graph is also edge-transitive, or the graph is a minimal Cayley graph, then the vertex-connectivity will also be equal to d.{{Citation|title=Technical Report TR-94-10|author=Babai, L.|year=1996|publisher=University of Chicago |url=http://www.cs.uchicago.edu/files/tr_authentic/TR-94-10.ps |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100611212234/http://www.cs.uchicago.edu/files/tr_authentic/TR-94-10.ps |archive-date=2010-06-11 }}

Infinite examples

Infinite vertex-transitive graphs include:

Two countable vertex-transitive graphs are called quasi-isometric if the ratio of their distance functions is bounded from below and from above. A well known conjecture stated that every infinite vertex-transitive graph is quasi-isometric to a Cayley graph. A counterexample was proposed by Diestel and Leader in 2001.{{citation|first1=Reinhard|last1=Diestel|first2=Imre|last2=Leader|authorlink2=Imre Leader|url=http://www.math.uni-hamburg.de/home/diestel/papers/Cayley.pdf|title=A conjecture concerning a limit of non-Cayley graphs|journal=Journal of Algebraic Combinatorics|volume=14|issue=1|year=2001|pages=17–25|doi=10.1023/A:1011257718029|s2cid=10927964|doi-access=free}}. In 2005, Eskin, Fisher, and Whyte confirmed the counterexample.{{cite arXiv|first1=Alex|last1=Eskin|first2=David|last2=Fisher|first3=Kevin|last3=Whyte|eprint=math.GR/0511647 |title=Quasi-isometries and rigidity of solvable groups|year=2005}}.

See also

References