wikipedia:Featured article review/Duke University/archive3

=[[Duke University]]=

==Review section==

Myriad issues were raised at the talk page by {{u|RetiredDuke}} three months ago and do not appear to have gotten any engagement. They include excessive length and undue focus on certain areas, inadequate sourcing, and puffery. {{u|Sdkb}}talk 06:32, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

:Answering to the ping; it seems like there's no one actively maintaining this article to FA standards. The Notable People section is a sprawling mess, the article's organization is lacking ("Duke Alumni Association" and "Duke Magazine" should not be their own sections, for instance), PROMO abound (why even the logos for the Medical School and Kunshan), and I've highlighted in Talk several instances where the text is not supported by the sources provided. Just now, as an exercise, I've focused on that {{tq|Cultural groups on campus include the Asian Students Association}}... paragraph, and both organizations that I've randomly checked, Blue Devils United and Mi Gente, are not mentioned in the links provided. So I suspect there's some of "I'm familiar with this subject so I'll just edit it to my knowledge" going on, that needs to be thoroughly checked. RetiredDuke (talk) 11:25, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

Comment: There seems to be some edits to this article; if those editors are willing to improve it, this article might be "kept". After a quick skim, some of my concerns include: too many images and MOS:SANDWICH happening throughout the article, some references are bare URLs or don't provide enough information, unsourced paragraphs, sections that are too short and WP:PROMO material that is not notable. I am willing to conduct a thorough copyedit if someone will respond to concerns I raise. Is that person you? Post below! Z1720 (talk) 20:59, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

::{{ping|Sdkb}} Thanks for the ping; you woke me from my wiki slumber. I'm not up to date on current editing practices, but I can at least add a call out to User:jbmurray who might help again. Xsmith (talk) 01:31, 30 June 2021 (UTC)

:::Hi {{u|Xsmith}}; glad to have you back from the wikislumber haha! Essentially, featured article de facto standards have gotten more stringent since 2012, and Duke's page hasn't necessarily been maintained to standard, thus why we're here. If you or someone else goes through the objections above and at the talk page and tries to address them, there's a better chance of being able to save this. {{u|Sdkb}}talk 02:53, 30 June 2021 (UTC)

==FARC section==

:Issues raised in the review section include sourcing and coverage. Nikkimaria (talk) 02:04, 26 June 2021 (UTC)

Delist: Nikkimaria did a major cleanup in mid-June, but concerns are still present in the article about unsources statements and too much detail. Z1720 (talk) 01:51, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

  • Delist I was hopeful someone familiar with Duke would pick this one up, but it doesn't seem to have happened. A good deal of unaddressed issues remain. Hog Farm Talk 13:46, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Delist per above, sourcing problems Bumbubookworm (talk) 19:11, 19 July 2021 (UTC)

{{FARClosed|delisted}} Nikkimaria (talk) 02:46, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.