Login
Login

wikipedia:tag bombing

{{About|tags that users can put in articles|information on tags that robots can put on edit histories|Wikipedia:Tags}}

{{essay|WP:TAGBOMB|WP:TAGBOMBING|WP:TAGFARM}}

{{nutshell|Adding multiple tags without explaining the reason is disruptive.}}

{{If April Fools|{{Ambox

|name = Multiple issues

|templatestyles = Multiple issues/styles.css

|class = ambox-multiple_issues compact-ambox

|type = content

|text =

This page has multiple issues. Please let someone else [{{fullurl:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|action=edit}} improve it] or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these template messages){{april fools}}

  • The neutrality of this essay may or may not be disputed. (April 1, {{CURRENTYEAR}})
  • This essay should be reorganized to place the "How to tag-bomb" section first. (April 1, {{CURRENTYEAR}})
  • This essay contains images of text which is too small to read comfortably. (April 1, {{CURRENTYEAR}})
  • The lead image of this essay should have a period at the end of the caption. (April 1, {{CURRENTYEAR}})
  • This essay may contain an excessive amount of intricate detail that may interest only people nerdy enough to edit Wikipedia. (April 1, {{CURRENTYEAR}})
  • This essay needs 666 additional citations for verification. (April 1, {{CURRENTYEAR}})
  • This essay could theoretically be a copyright violation if it is discovered in the future to have been copied wholesale from a hitherto unknown source. (April 1, {{CURRENTYEAR}})
  • This essay offensively trivializes violence by casually using triggering imagry of weapons deployed by neoimperialists to slaughter millions of innocents worldwide. (April 1, {{CURRENTYEAR}})
  • This essay has been censored by politically correct buffoons afraid to fully lean into the bombing metaphor. (April 1, {{CURRENTYEAR}})
  • This essay contains opinions that at least one editor thinks are wrong. (April 1, {{CURRENTYEAR}})
  • This essay contains opinions that multiple editors think are wrong. (April 1, {{CURRENTYEAR}})
  • This essay may contain redundant maintenance tags. (April 1, {{CURRENTYEAR}})
  • This essay makes a good point, but does it too snarkily. (April 1, {{CURRENTYEAR}})
  • This essay should have more views than it does. (April 1, {{CURRENTYEAR}})
  • This essay may contain redundant maintenance tags. (April 1, {{CURRENTYEAR}})
  • This essay may require cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards. The specific problem is: dont bomb me bro (April 1, {{CURRENTYEAR}})
  • This essay may lend undue weight to tag bombing when it could have focused instead on, say, cute goats. (April 1, {{CURRENTYEAR}})
  • This essay may contain redundant maintenance tags. (April 1, {{CURRENTYEAR}})
  • This essay could be better. (April 1, {{CURRENTYEAR}})
  • This essay may have too many maintenance tags. (April 1, {{CURRENTYEAR}})

}}

}}

File:B-2 Spirit bombing, 1994.jpg

Tag bombing is the unjustified addition of numerous tags to pages or unjustified addition of one tag to multiple pages. Tag bombing is a form of disruptive editing. Editors who engage in tag bombing after being asked to stop may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. While some tag bombing may be a well-intended request for clarification, tag bombing can be used as a way to promote a point of view.

Adding tags to articles should be accompanied by sufficient reasoning on the tagged article's talk page (or in a "reason" parameter where one exists) to explain why the tags are needed. However, tag bombing does not apply to the moderate use of tags that are self-explanatory because having the same information on the talk page is a redundancy. For example, the tag {{tl|unreferenced}} says "This article does not cite any references or sources. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed." There may be nothing more to say about an unreferenced article. The article either has sources or it does not have sources. There is no need to add {{tl|citation needed}} tags to numerous unreferenced statements in an article when {{tl|unreferenced}} or {{tl|refimprove}} would state equivalent information. Tags like {{tl|cleanup}}, on the other hand, say only a little more than "This may require cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards" and direct an editor to the Manual of Style, which contains myriad possible issues. The use of these tags may be enhanced by the use of an argument of what points in the Manual of Style need to be addressed.

Avoiding problems

To avoid tag-bombing:

;Consider applying only the most specific, helpful tags: For example, don't put on {{tl|cleanup}} if you're also putting on {{tl|copy edit}} and {{tl|cleanup-list}}; they might be enough. Avoid vague and redundant tags. When several tags do apply to a single article, consider using the {{tl|Multiple issues}} tag to group them together. This is one thing that robot-assisted tagging does. This should not become a "check-all-that-apply" exercise, in which the human operator checks off every single tag that applies, even if some of the tags apply only tenuously. {{tlf|Multiple issues}} can still be used to tag-bomb.

;Improve it yourself: If you can tag an article, you can also edit it in other potentially more helpful ways. Maybe you don't have the scientific expertise to edit an article on rocket science, but surely you can do something to fix the spelling of plain English words?

;Focus attention on the most important problems: If a page needs significant work, especially if it's a new page, then don't tag a page for every single problem. Add a tag for the one or two most urgent problems. When those have been resolved, then future editors can look for less urgent issues. Don't distract from major problems by adding tags for trivial ones.

How to tag-bomb

File:Tag bombing on wikipedia.png is what tag-bombing looks like. Does this "bomb" your screen with maintenance tags?]]

{{humorantipolicy|section=yes}}

{{mbox|align=left|type=content|text=An editor thinks something might be wrong with this section. They can't be bothered to fix it, but can rest assured that they've done their encyclopedic duty by sticking on a tag.
Please allow this tag to languish indefinitely at the top of the page since nobody knows exactly what the tagging editor was worked up about.}}

To tag-bomb, simply get a bunch of useless maintenance templates and place them right at the top. You may group them into a {{tl|Multiple issues}} template or you may not group them. You can also spread inline cleanup tags like {{tl|Citation needed}}, {{tl|Unreliable source?}}, {{tl|Better source}}, {{tl|Or?}} and {{tl|Self-published inline}}. Once you press the "Publish changes" button, you can find that the screen is exploded full of maintenance templates. After successful tag bombing, repeat it as much as you want. Use other articles. Remember: you can do it up to {{NUMBEROFARTICLES}} times and this is really fun! Just make sure the admins don't find out about this.

An extreme example of tag bombing was found at List of Magic: The Gathering keywords, which had a maintenance template saying that it had too many maintenance templates.

See also

Category:Wikipedia essays about templates