wrong bishop

{{Chess diagram

|tright

|

| |kd| | | | | |

| | | | | | | |

|kl| | | | | | |

|pl| |bl| | | | |

| | | | | | | |

|A wrong bishop in the situation of king, bishop, and rook pawn versus king

}}

In a chess endgame, a wrong bishop is a bishop that would have been better placed on the opposite square color.{{Harvcol|Rosen|2003|p=61}} This most commonly occurs with a bishop and one of its {{chessgloss|rook pawns}}, but it also occurs with a rook versus a bishop, a rook and one rook pawn versus a bishop, and possibly with a rook and one {{chessgloss|bishop pawn}} versus a bishop.

Rook versus bishop

{{Chess diagram

|tright

|V. Platov, 1925

| | | | | | | |kd

|rl| | | | | | |

| | | | | | | |

| | | | |kl| | |

| | | | | | | |bd

| | | | | | | |

|White wins because Black has the wrong bishop.

}}

White wins in this position. The defender has the wrong bishop if it is on the same color as the corner where his king is confined. Black's bishop is on the wrong color of square for it to form a fortress in the corner (i.e. with the black king on the h8-square and the bishop on the g8- or h7-square). White wins:

:1. Kf5! Kg8

:2. Ra4!! The only way to win. If 2.Kg6? Kf8 and the black king is able to get out of the "dangerous corner" or "wrong corner" and head to a "safe corner" or "right corner" where he can set up the fortress.

:2... Be1

:3. Kg6 Kf8

:4. Rf4+!, followed by 5. Re4, winning.{{Harvcol|Dvoretsky|2006|pp=235,366}}

Rook pawn

There are some situations involving a rook pawn and the wrong bishop.

=Bishop and rook pawn=

{{Chess diagram

|tright

|Müller & Lamprecht

|kd| | | | | | |

| | | | |bl| | |

|pl|kl| | | | | |

| | | | | | | |

|White has the wrong bishop, draw with either side to move

}}

In an endgame with a bishop and a rook pawn, the wrong bishop is one that does not control the promotion square of the pawn. This position is a draw with either side to move. Black simply keeps his king on the a8-, a7-, or b8-squares (or b7 if the pawn advances) to keep the pawn from promoting. A draw because of stalemate is also possible. If the bishop were on the other color it could force the black king out of the corner and the pawn could promote and win.{{Harvcol|Müller|Lamprecht|2001|pp=96–100}}

=Rook and rook pawn versus bishop=

{{Chess diagram

|tright

|Bernhard von Guretzky-Cornitz

| | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | |kd

| | | | | | | |pl

| | | | | | | |kl

| | | | | | | |rl

| | | |bd| | | |

| | | | | | | |

|White wins, the bishop is on the wrong color.

}}

A rook and a rook pawn always win against the wrong bishop, as in this position. The defender has the wrong bishop if it is the one on the same color as the pawn's promotion square. The winning procedure is to give up the pawn at the right time to get to a winning rook versus bishop endgame. If the bishop was on the other color, the defender may be able to form a fortress in the corner, as mentioned above.{{Harvcol|Fine|Benko|2003|pp=468–69}}

Rook and bishop pawn versus bishop

{{Chess diagram

|tright

|de la Villa, diagram 13.19

| | | | | |kd| |

| |rl| | | | | |

| | | | | |pl| |

| | | | |kl| | |

| | |bd| | | | |

| | | | | | | |

|Black to move draws.

}}

With a rook and a bishop pawn on the sixth rank versus a bishop, the bishop may be on the right color or the wrong color. In one case the rook and pawn win; in the other the bishop is able to draw. In this position Black is able to draw because his bishop is on the right color:

:1... Be2

:2. Kf4 Bc4

:3. Kg5 Bd5!

:4. Rc7 Ba2!

:5. Kg6 Bb1+!

:6. Kh6 Ba2!

:7. Ra7 Bc4

and there is no way for White to make progress.{{Harvcol|de la Villa|2008|pp=219–21}} This type of position was studied by Ercole del Rio around 1750.{{Harvcol|Benko|2007|pp=47–48}}{{Harvcol|Giddins|2007|p=77}} This case is similar to the case with a rook pawn (above), which also may be a draw.

=Examples from games=

align="right"

valign="top"

|+ Szabó vs. Botvinnik, 1952

|

{{Chess diagram

|tright

|

| | |bd| | |kd| |

| | | | | | | |pd

| | | | | |pl| |

|pl| | | |nl| |rl|

| | | | | | |pl|

|rd| | | | | | |

| | | |kl| | | |

| | | | | | | |

|Position before 51...Rxa5!

}}

|

{{Chess diagram

|tright

|

| | | | | |kd| |

|rl| | | | | | |

| | | | | |pl| |

| | | | | | |kl|

| | |bd| | | | |

| | | | | | | |

|Position after 59...Bc4

}}

In this 1952 game between László Szabó and World Champion Mikhail Botvinnik,[http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1032273 Szabo vs. Botvinnik, 1952] Black was defending two pawns down – a position that would normally be a win for White. Botvinnik saw an opportunity to exchange his rook for a knight and two pawns and reach a drawn position (even without his pawn). The game continued:

:51... Rxa5!

:52. Nd7+ Bxd7

:53. Rxa5 Bxg4

:54. Ke3 Be6

:55. Kf4 Bc4

:56. Ra7 h5

:57. Kg5 h4

:58. Kxh4 Bb3

:59. Kg5 Bc4

and reached the second position, which had been analyzed as a draw.

White was not able to make any progress. He promoted his pawn on move 76 and it was immediately captured by Black, resulting in a rook versus bishop endgame (see pawnless chess endings#Common pawnless endings (rook and minor pieces)) that was drawn two moves later.{{Harvcol|Giddins|2007|p=77}}

align="right"

valign="top"

|+ Miladinovic vs. Beliavsky, 2001

|

{{Chess diagram

|tright

|

| | | | | | | |

| | | |bl| | | |

| | | | | |kd| |

| | | | | | |pd|

| |rd| | | |pl|kl|

| | | | | | | |

|Black to move

}}

|

{{Chess diagram

|tright

|

| | | | | | | |

| | |bl| | | | |

| | | | | | | |

| | | | | | |kd|

| | | | |kl|pd| |rd

| | | | | | | |

|Position after 127.Bc5, draw

}}

In this game[http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1165659 Miladinovic vs. Beliavsky] between Igor Miladinović and Alexander Beliavsky, Black could have won by 99... Rxf3+, but instead played 99... gxf3?, reaching the theoretically-drawn position.

:99... gxf3?

:100. Bc5 Ke4

:101. Kf2 Rc3

:102. Ba7 Rc7

:103. Bb6 Rc2+

:104. Kf1 Rc6 (if 104...f2 then 105.Kg2! draws)

:105. Ba7 Ra6

:106. Bc5 Kf4

:107. Bd4 Ra4

:108. Bc5 Rc4

:109. Ba7 Rb4

:110. Bc5

The game was drawn on move 127.{{Harvcol|Makarov|2007|pp=106–7}}

Rook and pawn versus bishop and pawn

align="right"

valign="top"

|+ From Hawkins, p. 104

|

{{Chess diagram small

|tright

|

| | | | | | | |

| | |kd| |rd| | |

| | | |pd| | | |

| | | |pl| | | |

| | | |kl| |bl| |

| | | | | | | |

|Draw

}}

|

{{Chess diagram small

|tright

|

| | | | | | | |

| | |kd| |rd| | |

| | | |pd|bl| | |

| | | |pl| | | |

| | | |kl| | | |

| | | | | | | |

|Black wins

}}

In this type of position when the pawns are facing each other and blocked, the result often depends on which color the bishop is on. If the bishop is on the same color as its pawn, the rook almost always wins. If the bishop is on the color of the opposing pawn it has good drawing chances.{{Harvcol|Hawkins|2012|pp=90–93,104}}

References

Bibliography

{{citation

|last=Benko|first=Pal|author-link=Pal Benko

|year=2007

|title=Pal Benko's Endgame Laboratory

|publisher=Ishi Press

|isbn= 978-0-923891-88-6}}

{{citation

| last = de la Villa| first = Jesús|author-link=Jesús de la Villa

| title = 100 Endgames You Must Know

| publisher = New in Chess

| year = 2008

| isbn= 978-90-5691-244-4

}}

{{citation

| last = Dvoretsky| first = Mark| author-link = Mark Dvoretsky

| year = 2006

| title = Dvoretsky's Endgame Manual

| edition = 2nd

| publisher = Russell Enterprises

| isbn= 1-888690-28-3

}}

{{Citation

|last1=Fine|first1=Reuben|author-link=Reuben Fine

|last2=Benko|first2=Pal|author-link2=Pal Benko

|year=2003

|edition=2nd

|title=Basic Chess Endings

|publisher=McKay

|isbn= 0-8129-3493-8

}}

{{Citation

|last=Giddins|first=Steve|author-link=Stephen Giddins

|year=2007

|title=101 Chess Endgame Tips

|publisher=Gambit Publications

|isbn= 978-1-904600-66-4

}}

{{citation

|last= Hawkins |first=Jonathan

| title=Amateur to IM: Proven Ideas and Training Methods

|publisher=Mongoose

| year=2012

| isbn=978-1-936277-40-7}}

{{Citation

|last=Makarov|first=Marat

|title=The Endgame

|year=2007

|publisher=Chess Stars

|isbn= 978-954-8782-63-0}}

{{citation

|last1=Müller|first1=Karsten|author-link=Karsten Müller

|last2=Lamprecht|first2=Frank|author-link2=Frank Lamprecht

|year=2001

|title=Fundamental Chess Endings

|publisher=Gambit Publications

|isbn= 1-901983-53-6

}}

{{Citation

|last=Rosen|first=Bernd

|title=Chess Endgame Training

|year=2003

|publisher=Gambit Publications

|isbn= 978-1-904600-01-5}}

wrong bishop

Rook versus bishop

Rook pawn

=Bishop and rook pawn=

=Rook and rook pawn versus bishop=

Rook and bishop pawn versus bishop

=Examples from games=

Rook and pawn versus bishop and pawn

References

Further reading