:Bernard Lewis
{{short description|British-American historian (1916–2018)}}
{{About|the historian}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=April 2023}}
{{Infobox scholar
| name = Bernard Lewis
| image = Bernard Lewis in 2012 (1).JPG
| caption = Lewis in 2012
| alt =
| fullname =
| other_names =
| birth_date = {{Birth date|df=yes|1916|5|31}}
| birth_place = London, England
| death_date = {{Death date and age|df=yes|2018|5|19|1916|5|31}}
| death_place = Voorhees Township, New Jersey, U.S.
| region =
| school_tradition =
| main_interests = Middle Eastern studies, Islamic studies
| notable_ideas =
| major_works = {{unbulleted list | The Jews of Islam {{small|(1984)}} | Islam and the West {{small|(1993)}} | What Went Wrong? {{small|(2002)}}}}
| doctoral_advisor =
| academic_advisors =
| doctoral_students = Feroz Ahmad
| notable_students =
| influences =
| influenced = Heath W. Lowry, Fouad Ajami
| awards = Fellow of the British Academy
Harvey Prize
Irving Kristol Award
Jefferson Lecture
National Humanities Medal
| alma_mater = SOAS (BA, PhD)
University of Paris
| workplaces = SOAS
Princeton University
Cornell University
| children = 2
| spouse = Ruth Hélène Oppenhejm
(married 1947–1974)
| discipline = Historian
| honorific_prefix =
| honorific_suffix =
| nationality = British
American
}}
Bernard Lewis, {{post-nominals|country=GBR|FBA}}{{Cite web|url=https://www.thebritishacademy.ac.uk/fellows/bernard-lewis-FBA|title=Professor Bernard Lewis|website=The British Academy|language=en|access-date=14 December 2019}} (31 May 1916 – 19 May 2018) was a British-American historian specialized in Oriental studies.{{cite news |author= |title=Bernard Lewis, Scholar and Political Advisor, Dead At 101 |url=https://www.jpost.com/Breaking-News/Bernard-Lewis-scholar-and-political-advisor-dead-at-101-557881 |work=The Jerusalem Post |location=Jerusalem |date=20 May 2018 |access-date=20 May 2018 }} He was also known as a public intellectual and political commentator. Lewis was the Cleveland E. Dodge Professor Emeritus of Near Eastern Studies at Princeton University. Lewis's expertise was in the history of Islam and the interaction between Islam and the West.
Lewis served as a soldier in the British Army in the Royal Armoured Corps and Intelligence Corps during the Second World War before being seconded to the Foreign Office. After the war, he returned to the School of Oriental and African Studies at the University of London and was appointed to the new chair in Near and Middle Eastern history.
In 2007, Lewis was called "the West's leading interpreter of the Middle East".{{cite web|url=http://www.unc.edu/depts/diplomat/item/2007/0406/ed_distance.html|title=Will the West – and the United States – Go the Distance?|last1=Abrahmson|first1=James L.|date=8 June 2007|website=American Diplomacy|access-date=16 February 2015}} Others have said Lewis's approach is essentialist and generalizing to the Muslim world, as well as his tendency to restate hypotheses that were challenged by more recent research. On a political level, Lewis's detractors say he revived the image of the cultural inferiority of Islam and of emphasizing the dangers of jihad.{{cite book | last=König | first=Daniel | title=Arabic-Islamic Views of the Latin West: Tracing the Emergence of Medieval Europe | chapter= Arabic-Islamic Records | publisher=Oxford University Press | location=Oxford | year=2015 | isbn=978-0-19-873719-3 | oclc=913853067 | page= 21}} His advice was frequently sought by neoconservative policymakers, including the Bush administration.{{cite news|last1=Weisberg|first1=Jacob|title=AEI's weird celebration|url=http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/the_big_idea/2007/03/party_of_defeat.html|access-date=16 February 2015|work=Slate|date=14 March 2007}} His active support of the Iraq War and neoconservative ideals have since come under scrutiny.[http://forward.com/news/163089/neocons-gather-to-fete-iraq-war-godfather-bernard/ Neocons Gather To Fete Iraq War Godfather Bernard Lewis], The Forward[http://mondoweiss.net/2012/04/bernard-lewis-revises-bernard-lewis-says-he-opposed-invasion-of-iraq/ Bernard Lewis revises Bernard Lewis (says he opposed invasion of Iraq!)], Mondoweiss[http://www.thenational.ae/arts-lifestyle/the-review/how-neoconservatives-led-us-to-war-in-iraq How neoconservatives led US to war in Iraq], The National (Abu Dhabi){{cite book | last = Migdal | first = Joel | title = Shifting Sands the United States in the Middle East | publisher = Columbia University Press | location = New York | year = 2014 | isbn = 978-0-231-53634-9 |page = 241 }}{{cite book | last = Ahmad | first = Muhammad | title = The road to Iraq: the making of a neoconservative war | publisher = Edinburgh University Press | location = Edinburgh | year = 2014 | isbn = 978-0-7486-9305-4 | url = https://books.google.com/books?id=SX9KBQAAQBAJ&q=Bernard+Lewis+neoconservative&pg=PT101 }}{{cite book | last = Chaudet | first = Didier | title = When Empire Meets Nationalism: Power Politics in the US and Russia | publisher = Routledge | location = City | year = 2016 | isbn = 978-1-134-76253-8 | url = https://books.google.com/books?id=P_aNCwAAQBAJ&q=Bernard+Lewis+neoconservative&pg=PT170 }}
Lewis was notable for his public debates with Edward Said, who said Lewis was a Zionist apologist and an Orientalist who "demeaned" Arabs, misrepresented Islam, and promoted Western imperialism,{{Cite web|date=6 June 2018|title=Bernard Lewis obituary|website=TheGuardian.com |url=https://www.theguardian.com/books/2018/jun/06/bernard-lewis-obituary}} to which Lewis responded by saying Orientalism was a facet of humanism and that Said was politicizing the subject.{{cite encyclopedia|encyclopedia=Encyclopedia of Historians and Historical Writing|title=Bernard Lewis|first=Martin|last=Kramer|publisher=Fitzroy Dearborn|location=London|year=1999|volume=1|pages=719–20|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101227094217/http://www.martinkramer.org/sandbox/reader/archives/bernard-lewis/|url=http://www.geocities.com/martinkramerorg/BernardLewis.htm|archive-date=27 December 2010|access-date=23 May 2006}}{{cite journal|journal=New York Review of Books|title=Orientalism: An Exchange |author=Edward W. Said |author2=Oleg Grabar |author3=Bernard Lewis |date=12 August 1982|volume=29 |issue=13 |url=http://www.nybooks.com/articles/1982/08/12/orientalism-an-exchange/}}
Lewis was also known for denying the Armenian Genocide. His argument that there was no evidence of a deliberate genocide carried out against the Armenian people by the Ottoman Empire is rejected by other historians.{{sfn|Baer|2020|p=141}}{{sfn|Auron|2003|p=230}} He said that the mass killings resulted from a mutual struggle between two nationalistic movements, a view that has been criticized as "ahistorical."{{cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=q_mHshUAeZ8C&pg=PA31 |title=A Question of Genocide: Armenians and Turks at the End of the Ottoman Empire |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=2011 |isbn=978-0-19-978104-1 |editor=Ronald Grigor Suny |pages=31–33 |editor2=Fatma Müge Göçek |editor3=Norman M. Naimark}}
Family and personal life
Bernard Lewis was born on 31 May 1916 to middle-class British Jewish parents, Harry Lewis and the former Jane Levy,{{cite web|url=https://www.encyclopedia.com/arts/educational-magazines/lewis-bernard-1916|title=Lewis, Bernard 1916– Dictionary definition of Lewis, Bernard 1916– Encyclopedia.com: FREE online dictionary|website=www.encyclopedia.com}} in Stoke Newington, London. He became interested in languages and history while preparing for his bar mitzvah.{{sfn|Lewis|2004|pp= 1–2}} In 1947 he married Ruth Hélène Oppenhejm, with whom he had a daughter and a son. Their marriage was dissolved in 1974. Lewis became a naturalized citizen of the United States in 1982.
Academic career
In 1936, Lewis graduated from the School of Oriental Studies (now School of Oriental and African Studies, SOAS) at the University of London with a BA in history with special reference to the Near and Middle East. He earned his PhD three years later, also from SOAS, specializing in the history of Islam.{{cite web|title=Bernard Lewis Cleveland E. Dodge Professor of Near Eastern Studies, Emeritus |url=https://www.princeton.edu/~nes/faculty_lewis.html |website=University of Princeton |access-date=26 May 2006 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060516012512/http://www.princeton.edu/~nes/faculty_lewis.html |archive-date=16 May 2006 }} Lewis also studied law, going part of the way toward becoming a solicitor, but returned to study Middle Eastern history. He undertook post-graduate studies at the University of Paris, where he studied with the orientalist Louis Massignon and earned the "Diplôme des Études Sémitiques" in 1937. He returned to SOAS in 1938 as an assistant lecturer in Islamic History.{{cite news|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/3602621/Profile-Professor-Bernard-Lewis.html |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20220112/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/3602621/Profile-Professor-Bernard-Lewis.html |archive-date=12 January 2022 |url-access=subscription |url-status=live|title=Profile: Professor Bernard Lewis|newspaper=Telegraph|date=15 February 2004|access-date=20 May 2018}}{{cbignore}}
During the Second World War, Lewis served in the British Army in the Royal Armoured Corps and as a corporal in the Intelligence Corps in 1940–41 before being seconded to the Foreign Office.{{cite web|last1=Sugarman|first1=Martin|title=Breaking the codes; Jewish personnel at Bletchley Park|url=http://www.bletchleypark.org.uk/resources/filer.rhtm/595696/breaking+the+codes-+jewish+personnel+at+bletchley+park.pdf|website=Bletchley Park|access-date=19 February 2015|date=6 October 2008|archive-date=30 September 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130930213234/http://www.bletchleypark.org.uk/resources/filer.rhtm/595696/breaking+the+codes-+jewish+personnel+at+bletchley+park.pdf|url-status=dead}} After the war, he returned to SOAS, where he would remain for the next 25 years. In 1949, at the age of 33, he was appointed to the new chair in Near and Middle Eastern History.{{sfn|Lewis|2004|pp=3–4}} In 1963, Lewis was granted fellowship of the British Academy.
In 1974, aged 57, Lewis accepted a joint position at Princeton University and the Institute for Advanced Study, also located in Princeton, New Jersey. The terms of his appointment were such that Lewis taught only one semester per year, and being free from administrative responsibilities, he could devote more time to research than previously. Consequently, Lewis's arrival at Princeton marked the beginning of the most prolific period in his research career during which he published numerous books and articles based on previously accumulated materials.{{sfn|Lewis|2004|pp=6–7}} After retiring from Princeton in 1986, Lewis served at Cornell University until 1990.
File:Robert Wistrich and Bernard Lewis.jpg
In 1966, Lewis was a founding member of the learned society, Middle East Studies Association of North America (MESA), but in 2007 he broke away and founded Association for the Study of the Middle East and Africa (ASMEA) to challenge MESA, which the New York Sun noted as "dominated by academics who have been critical of Israel and of America's role in the Middle East".{{cite news|last1=Karni|first1=Annie|title=Group formed to improve Middle East scholarship|url=http://www.nysun.com/new-york/group-formed-to-improve-middle-east-scholarship/66110/|access-date=19 February 2015|work=The New York Sun|date=8 November 2007}}
In 1990, the National Endowment for the Humanities selected Lewis for the Jefferson Lecture, the U.S. federal government's highest honor for achievement in the humanities. His lecture, entitled "Western Civilization: A View from the East", was revised and reprinted in The Atlantic Monthly under the title "The Roots of Muslim Rage."{{cite web|title=Jefferson Lecture|url=http://www.neh.gov/about/awards/jefferson-lecture|website=The National Endowment for the Humanities|access-date=19 February 2015}}{{cite web|last1=Lewis|first1=Bernard|title=The roots of Muslim rage|url=https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1990/09/the-roots-of-muslim-rage/304643/|website=The Atlantic|access-date=19 February 2015|date=1 September 1990}} His 2007 Irving Kristol Lecture, given to the American Enterprise Institute, was published as Europe and Islam.{{cite web|url=http://www.aei.org/publication/the-2007-irving-kristol-lecture-by-bernard-lewis/|title=The 2007 Irving Kristol Lecture by Bernard Lewis|publisher=AEI|access-date=20 May 2018}}
Research
Lewis's influence extends beyond academia to the general public. He began his research career with the study of medieval Arab, especially Syrian, history. His first article, dedicated to professional guilds of medieval Islam, had been widely regarded as the most authoritative work on the subject for about thirty years.{{cite journal|first=R. Stephen|last=Humphreys|journal=Humanities|title=Bernard Lewis: An Appreciation|volume= 11|issue=3|date=May–June 1990|pages=17–20|url=https://docs.google.com/document/pub?id=1YRNmBFbo4R32F3j9QChFTPdTi8TIa0_D6ZQ1D45vhAE|access-date=20 February 2015}} However, after the establishment of the state of Israel in 1948, scholars of Jewish origin found it more and more difficult to conduct archival and field research in Arab countries, where they were suspected of espionage. Therefore, Lewis switched to the study of the Ottoman Empire, while continuing to research Arab history through the Ottoman archives which had only recently been opened to Western researchers. A series of articles that Lewis published over the next several years revolutionized the history of the Middle East by giving a broad picture of Islamic society, including its government, economy, and demographics.
Lewis argued that the Middle East is currently backward and its decline was a largely self-inflicted condition resulting from both culture and religion, as opposed to the post-colonialist view which posits the problems of the region as economic and political maldevelopment mainly due to the 19th-century European colonization.{{sfn|Lewis|2004|pp=156–80}} In his 1982 work Muslim Discovery of Europe, Lewis argues that Muslim societies could not keep pace with the West and that "Crusader successes were due in no small part to Muslim weakness."{{cite book|last1=Lewis|first1=Bernard|title=The Muslim Discovery of Europe|date=2001|publisher=W. W. Norton & Company|location=New York|isbn=978-0-393-32165-4|page=[https://archive.org/details/muslimdiscoveryo00lewi/page/22 22]|url=https://archive.org/details/muslimdiscoveryo00lewi/page/22}} Further, he suggested that as early as the 11th century Islamic societies were decaying, primarily the byproduct of internal problems like "cultural arrogance," which was a barrier to creative borrowing, rather than external pressures like the Crusades.
In the wake of Soviet and Arab attempts to delegitimize Israel as a racist country, Lewis wrote a study of anti-Semitism, Semites and Anti-Semites (1986). In other works he argued Arab rage against Israel was disproportionate to other tragedies or injustices in the Muslim world, such as the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan and control of Muslim-majority land in Central Asia, the bloody and destructive fighting during the Hama uprising in Syria (1982), the Algerian Civil War (1992–1998), and the Iran–Iraq War (1980–1988).{{cite book|last1=Lewis|first1=Bernard|title=The Crisis of Islam: Holy War and Unholy Terror|date=2004|publisher=Random House Trade Paperbacks|location=New York|isbn=978-0-8129-6785-2|pages=[https://archive.org/details/crisisofislam00bern/page/90 90–91, 108, 110–11]|url=https://archive.org/details/crisisofislam00bern/page/90}}
{{external media | width = 210px | float = right | headerimage= | video1 = [https://www.c-span.org/video/?167924-1/went-wrong Booknotes interview with Lewis on What Went Wrong?, 30 December 2001], C-SPAN{{cite web | title =What Went Wrong| publisher =C-SPAN | date =30 December 2001 | url =https://www.c-span.org/video/?167924-1/went-wrong| access-date =25 March 2017 }} }}
In addition to his scholarly works, Lewis wrote several influential books accessible to the general public: The Arabs in History (1950), The Middle East and the West (1964), and The Middle East (1995). In the wake of the 11 September 2001 attacks, the interest in Lewis's work surged, especially his 1990 essay The Roots of Muslim Rage. Three of his books were published after 9/11: What Went Wrong? (written before the attacks), which explored the reasons of the Muslim world's apprehension of (and sometimes outright hostility to) modernization; The Crisis of Islam; and Islam: The Religion and the People.{{Citation needed|date=October 2024}}
Abraham Udovitch described him as "certainly the most eminent and respected historian of the Arab world, of the Islamic world, of the Middle East and beyond".{{Cite web|url=https://www.princeton.edu/news/2018/05/22/bernard-lewis-eminent-middle-east-historian-princeton-dies-101|title=Bernard Lewis, eminent Middle East historian at Princeton, dies at 101|last=Aronson|first=Emily|date=22 May 2018|website=Princeton University|language=en|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191214203455/https://www.princeton.edu/news/2018/05/22/bernard-lewis-eminent-middle-east-historian-princeton-dies-101|archive-date=14 December 2019|access-date=14 December 2019}}
Columbia University historian Richard Bulliet said that Bernard Lewis "looked down on modern Arabs." and suggested that he considers them "worthy only to a degree they follow a Western path." Edward Said called him a Zionist apologist and an orientalist who "demeaned" Arabs.{{Cite web|title=Bernard Lewis was an important, but flawed, academic mind|url=https://www.toledoblade.com/S-Amjad-Hussain/2018/06/03/Bernard-Lewis-was-an-important-but-flawed-academic-mind/stories/20180603045}}{{Cite web|title=Do not weep for Bernard Lewis, high priest of war in the Middle East|url=https://www.middleeasteye.net/opinion/do-not-weep-bernard-lewis-high-priest-war-middle-east}}{{Cite news|title=Bernard Lewis obituary|website=TheGuardian.com |date=6 June 2018 |url=https://www.theguardian.com/books/2018/jun/06/bernard-lewis-obituary|last1=Joffe |first1=Lawrence }}
= Armenian genocide =
{{See also|Armenian genocide denial}}
The first two editions of Lewis's The Emergence of Modern Turkey (1961 and 1968) describe the Armenian genocide as "the terrible holocaust of 1915, when a million and a half Armenians perished".{{cite book|last1=Karsh|first1=Efraim|title=Islamic Imperialism: A History|date=2007|publisher=Yale University Press|location=New Haven, Connecticut|isbn=978-0-300-10603-9|page=[https://archive.org/details/islamicimperiali00kars/page/242 242]|url=https://archive.org/details/islamicimperiali00kars|url-access=registration|quote=lewis.|access-date=21 February 2015}} In later editions, this text is altered to "the terrible slaughter of 1915, when, according to estimates, more than a million Armenians perished, as well as an unknown number of Turks".{{Cite book |last=Baer |first=Marc David |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Bx_TDwAAQBAJ |title=Sultanic Saviors and Tolerant Turks: Writing Ottoman Jewish History, Denying the Armenian Genocide |date=10 March 2020 |publisher=Indiana University Press |isbn=978-0-253-04543-0 |language=en}} In this passage, Lewis argues that the deaths were the result of a struggle for the same land between two competing nationalist movements.
The change in Lewis's textual description of the Armenian genocide and his signing of the petition against the Congressional resolution was controversial among some Armenian historians as well as journalists, who suggested that Lewis was engaging in historical negationism to serve his own political and personal interests.{{cite book|last1=Dadrian|first1=Vahakn N.|title=Warrant for Genocide: Key Elements of Turko-Armenian Conflict|date=2007|publisher=Transaction Publishers|location=New Brunswick, N.J.|isbn=978-0-7658-0559-1|pages=131}}
Lewis called the label "genocide" the "Armenian version of this history" in a November 1993 interview with Le Monde, for which he faced a civil proceeding in a French court under the Gayssot Law.{{cite news|newspaper=Le Monde|url=http://www.lemonde.fr/europe/article/2005/04/22/l-historien-bernard-lewis-condamne-pour-avoir-nie-la-realite-du-genocide-armenien_641923_3214.html|title=L'historien Bernard Lewis condamné pour avoir nié la réalité du génocide arménien|date=22 April 2005|author=Nathaniel Herzberg}} The prosecution failed because the court determined that the law did not apply to events before World War II.{{sfn|Auron|2003|pp=228–229}} In a 1995 civil proceeding brought by three Armenian genocide survivors, a French court censured Lewis' remarks under Article 1382 of the Civil Code and fined him one franc, and ordering the publication of the judgment at Lewis' cost in Le Monde. The court ruled that while Lewis has the right to his views, their expression harmed a third party and that "it is only by hiding elements which go against his thesis that the defendant was able to state there was no 'serious proof' of the Armenian Genocide".{{cite web |title=Paris, France, Court of First Instance |url=https://www.armenian-genocide.org/Affirmation.240/current_category.76/affirmation_detail.html |access-date=25 February 2021 |website=Armenian National Institute}}{{sfn|Baer|2020|p=141}}{{sfn|Auron|2003|p=230}} Three other court cases against Bernard Lewis failed in the Paris tribunal, including one filed by the Armenian National Committee of France and two filed by Jacques Trémollet de Villers.{{cite news |date=27 November 1994 |title=Les actions engagées par les parties civiles arméniennes contre "le Monde" déclarées irrecevables par le tribunal de Paris |language=fr |work=Le Monde}}{{cite web|title=Lewis Replies|url=https://www.princeton.edu/~paw/archive_old/PAW95-96/16_9596/0605let.html#story3|website=Princeton Alumni Weekly|access-date=21 February 2015|date=5 June 1996}}
Lewis's views on the Armenian genocide were criticized by a number of historians and sociologists, among them Alain Finkielkraut, Yves Ternon, Richard G. Hovannisian, Robert Melson, and Pierre Vidal-Naquet.{{cite book|last1=Auron|first1=Yair|title=The Banality of Denial: Israel and the Armenian Genocide|date=2005|publisher=Transaction Publishers|location=New Brunswick, N.J.|isbn=978-0-7658-0834-9|page=235}}{{cite book|last1=Melson|first1=Robert|title=Revolution and Genocide: On the Origins of the Armenian Genocide and the Holocaust|date=1992|publisher=University of Chicago Press|location=Chicago|isbn=978-0-226-51990-6|page=[https://archive.org/details/revolutiongenoci00mels/page/289 289]|url=https://archive.org/details/revolutiongenoci00mels/page/289}}{{cite book|last1=MacDonald|first1=David B.|title=Identity Politics in the Age of Genocide: The Holocaust and Historical Representation|date=2008|publisher=Routledge|location=London|isbn=978-0-415-43061-6|page=241}}{{cite book|last1=Finkelstein|first1=Norman G.|title=The Holocaust Industry: Reflections on the Exploitation of Jewish Suffering|date=2003|publisher=Verso|location=London|isbn=978-1-85984-488-5|page=69}}
Lewis did not deny that large numbers of murders took place, but he denied that they were a purposeful Young Turk government policy and therefore they should not be categorized as a genocide.{{Cite book |last=Pierpaoli |first=Paul G. Jr. |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=0vrnCQAAQBAJ&pg=PA170 |title=The Armenian Genocide: The Essential Reference Guide: The Essential Reference Guide |date=26 May 2015 |publisher=ABC-CLIO |isbn=978-1-61069-688-3 |editor-last=Whitehorn |editor-first=Alan |pages=169–170 |language=en |chapter=Lewis, Bernard}} In 2002, he argued for his denial stance:{{blockquote|This is a question of definition and nowadays the word "genocide" is used very loosely even in cases where no bloodshed is involved at all and I can understand the annoyance of those who feel refused. But in this particular case, the point that was being made was that the massacre of the Armenians in the Ottoman Empire was the same as what happened to Jews in Nazi Germany and that is a downright falsehood. What happened to the Armenians was the result of a massive Armenian armed rebellion against the Turks, which began even before war broke out, and continued on a larger scale. Great numbers of Armenians, including members of the armed forces, deserted, crossed the frontier and joined the Russian forces invading Turkey. Armenian rebels actually seized the city of Van and held it for a while intending to hand it over to the invaders. There was guerilla warfare all over Anatolia. And it is what we nowadays call the National Movement of Armenians Against Turkey. The Turks certainly resorted to very ferocious methods in repelling it. There is clear evidence of a decision by the Turkish Government, to deport the Armenian population from the sensitive areas. Which meant naturally the whole of Anatolia. Not including the Arab provinces which were then still part of the Ottoman Empire. There is no evidence of a decision to massacre. On the contrary, there is considerable evidence of attempt to prevent it, which were not very successful. Yes there were tremendous massacres, the numbers are very uncertain but a million nay may well be likely.{{cite web|url=http://www.ataa.org/reference/lewis.pdf|title=Statement of Professor Bernard Lewis, Princeton University, "Distinguishing Armenian Case from Holocaust"|publisher=Assembly of Turkish American Associations|date=14 April 2002|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060715105123/http://www.ataa.org/magazine/blewis_statement.pdf|archive-date=15 July 2006|url-status=live|access-date=21 February 2015}} [and] The massacres were carried out by irregulars, by local villagers responding to what had been done to them and in number of other ways. But to make this, a parallel with the holocaust in Germany, you would have to assume the Jews of Germany had been engaged in an armed rebellion against the German state, collaborating with the allies against Germany. That in the deportation order the cities of Hamburg and Berlin were exempted, persons in the employment of state were exempted, and the deportation only applied to the Jews of Germany proper, so that when they got to Poland they were welcomed and sheltered by the Polish Jews. This seems to me a rather absurd parallel.{{cite web|last1=Getler|first1=Michae|title=Documenting and Debating a 'Genocide'|url=https://www.pbs.org/ombudsman/2006/04/documenting_and_debating_a_genocide.html|website=PBS|access-date=21 February 2015|date=21 April 2006}}}}
Lewis has been labelled a "genocide denier" by Stephen Zunes,{{cite web|last1=Zunes|first1=Stephen|title=US Denial of the Armenian Genocide|url=http://www.commondreams.org/views/2007/10/22/us-denial-armenian-genocide|website=Common Dreams|access-date=21 February 2015|archive-date=21 February 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150221133448/http://www.commondreams.org/views/2007/10/22/us-denial-armenian-genocide|url-status=dead}} Israel Charny, David B. MacDonaldIdentity Politics in the Age of Genocide: The Holocaust and Historical Representation, By David B. MacDonald, Routledge, 2008, {{ISBN|0-415-43061-5}}, p. 121 and the Armenian National Committee of America.{{cite web|url=http://asbarez.com/54263/genocide-denier-bernard-lewis-honored-at-white-house-ceremony/|title=Genocide Denier Bernard Lewis Honored at White House Ceremony – Asbarez.com|website=asbarez.com|date=28 November 2006}} Israeli historian Yair Auron suggested that "Lewis' stature provided a lofty cover for the Turkish national agenda of obfuscating academic research on the Armenian Genocide".{{cite book |last1=Auron |first1=Yair |title=The Banality of Denial: Israel and the Armenian Genocide |date=2003 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-1-351-30542-6 |page=230 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=PpsuDwAAQBAJ&q=%22Lewis%27+stature+provided+a+lofty+cover+for+the+Turkish+national+agenda+of+obfuscating+academic+research+on+the+Armenian+Genocide%22&pg=PT230 |language=en}} Israel Charny wrote that Lewis's "seemingly scholarly concern ... of Armenians constituting a threat to the Turks as a rebellious force who together with the Russians threatened the Ottoman Empire, and the insistence that only a policy of deportations was executed, barely conceal the fact that the organized deportations constituted systematic mass murder".{{cite journal|last1=Charny|first1=Israel|title=The Psychological Satisfaction of Denials of the Holocaust or Other Genocides by Non-Extremists or Bigots, and Even by Known Scholars|journal=IDEA|date=17 July 2001|url=http://www.ideajournal.com/articles.php?id=27|access-date=21 February 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071224203627/http://www.ideajournal.com/articles.php?id=27|archive-date=24 December 2007}} Charny compares the "logical structures" employed by Lewis in his denial of the genocide to those employed by Ernst Nolte in his Holocaust negationism.{{cite book|last1=Charny|first1=Israel W.|title=Fighting Suicide Bombing: A Worldwide Campaign for Life|date=2006|publisher=Praeger Security International|location=Westport, Connecticut|isbn=978-0-275-99336-8|page=241}} Lewis has also falsely implied that the Armenians had military and police forces at their disposal, whom they could have called upon, when, in reality, they had no such forces at all.
Views and influence on contemporary politics
In the mid-1960s, Lewis emerged as a commentator on the issues of the modern Middle East and his analysis of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict and the rise of militant Islam brought him publicity and aroused significant controversy. American historian Joel Beinin has called him "perhaps the most articulate and learned Zionist advocate in the North American Middle East academic community".{{cite journal|last1=Beinin|first1=Joel|title=Review of Semites and Anti-Semites: An Inquiry into Conflict and Prejudice by Bernard Lewis|journal=MERIP Middle East Report|date=July 1987|issue=147|pages=42–45|doi=10.2307/3011952|jstor=3011952}} Lewis's policy advice had particular weight thanks to this scholarly authority. U.S. Vice President Dick Cheney remarked "in this new century, his wisdom is sought daily by policymakers, diplomats, fellow academics, and the news media".{{cite web|title=Remarks by Vice President Cheney at the World Affairs Council of Philadelphia Luncheon Honoring Professor Bernard Lewis |publisher=The White House|date=2 May 2006|access-date=22 February 2015|url=https://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2006/05/20060501-3.html}}
A harsh critic of the Soviet Union, Lewis continued the liberal tradition in Islamic historical studies. Although his early Marxist views had a bearing on his first book The Origins of Ismailism, Lewis subsequently discarded Marxism. His later works are a reaction against the left-wing current of Third-worldism which came to be a significant current in Middle Eastern studies.
During his career Lewis developed ties with governments around the world: during her time as Prime Minister of Israel, Golda Meir assigned Lewis's articles as reading to her cabinet members, and during the presidency of George W. Bush, he advised administration members including Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld and Bush himself. He was also close to King Hussein of Jordan and his brother, Prince Hassan bin Talal. He also had ties to the regime of Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, the last Shah of Iran, the Turkish military dictatorship led by Kenan Evren, and the Egyptian government of Anwar Sadat: he acted as a go-between between the Sadat administration and Israel in 1971 when he relayed a message to the Israeli government regarding the possibility of a peace agreement at the request of Sadat's spokesman Tahasin Bashir.
File:David Horovitz interviews Bernard Lewis.jpg interviewing Bernard Lewis in 2011]]
Lewis advocated closer Western ties with Israel and Turkey, which he saw as especially important in light of the extension of the Soviet influence in the Middle East. Modern Turkey holds a special place in Lewis's view of the region due to the country's efforts to become a part of the West. He was an Honorary Fellow of the Institute of Turkish Studies, an honor which is given "on the basis of generally recognized scholarly distinction and ... long and devoted service to the field of Turkish Studies."{{cite web|title=About the Institute of Turkish Studies|url=http://www.turkishstudies.org/about/index.shtml|website=Institute of Turkish Studies|access-date=22 February 2015|archive-date=1 October 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181001052822/http://turkishstudies.org/about/index.shtml}}
Lewis views Christendom and Islam as civilizations that have been in perpetual collision since the advent of Islam in the 7th century. In his essay The Roots of Muslim Rage (1990), he argued that the struggle between the West and Islam was gathering strength. According to one source, this essay (and Lewis's 1990 Jefferson Lecture on which the article was based) first introduced the term "Islamic fundamentalism" to North America.{{cite book|last1=Haque|first1=Amber|editor1-last=Driel|editor1-first=Barry van|title=Confronting Islamophobia in Educational Practice|date=2004|publisher=Trentham Books|location=Stoke-on-Trent|isbn=978-1-85856-340-4|page=6|chapter=Islamophobia in North America: Confronting the Menace}} This essay has been credited with coining the phrase "clash of civilizations", which received prominence in the eponymous book by Samuel Huntington.{{cite web|first=Fouad|last=Ajami|author-link=Fouad Ajami|title=A Sage in Christendom: A Personal Tribute to Bernard Lewis|publisher=OpinionJournal|date=2 May 2006|access-date=23 May 2006|url=http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110008313}} However, another source indicates that Lewis first used the phrase "clash of civilizations" at a 1957 meeting in Washington where it was recorded in the transcript.{{cite news|last1=Liebowitz|first1=Ruthie Blum|title=One on One: When Defeat Means Liberation|url=http://www.jpost.com/Magazine/Features/One-on-One-When-defeat-means-liberation|work=Jerusalem Post|date=6 March 2008}}
In 1998, Lewis read in a London-based newspaper Al-Quds Al-Arabi a declaration of war on the United States by Osama bin Laden. In his essay "A License to Kill", Lewis indicated he considered bin Laden's language as the "ideology of jihad" and warned that bin Laden would be a danger to the West. The essay was published after the Clinton administration and the US intelligence community had begun its hunt for bin Laden in Sudan and then in Afghanistan.
Some of his views have been likened to the Eurabia thesis, such as warning that Europe would turn Muslim by the end of the century,{{cite news|url=https://www.ft.com/content/123ade02-4e6f-11dc-85e7-0000779fd2ac|title=Head count belies vision of 'Eurabia'|date=19 August 2007|work=Financial Times}} becoming "part of the Arab West, the Maghreb",{{cite news|url=https://www.economist.com/leaders/2006/06/22/tales-from-eurabia|title=Tales from Eurabia|date=22 June 2006|newspaper=The Economist}} and his 2007 pamphlet Europe and Islam{{cite news|url=https://foreignpolicy.com/2010/01/04/eurabian-follies/|title=Eurabian Follies|date=4 January 2010|work=Foreign Policy}} said demographic changes could be realized "in the foreseeable future."
= Jihad =
Lewis writes of jihad as a distinct religious obligation, but suggests that it is a pity that people engaging in terrorist activities are not more aware of their own religion:{{Cite book|last=Lewis, Bernard 1916–2018|title=Islam: the religion and the people|others=Churchill, Buntzie Ellis 1939–|date=4 December 2015|isbn=978-0-13-443119-2|edition=Second printing, with corrections in October 2011|location=Upper Saddle River|pages=146, 151, 153|oclc=940955691}}{{blockquote|The fanatical warrior offering his victims the choice of the Koran or the sword is not only untrue, it is impossible. The alleged choice—conversion or death—is also, with rare and atypical exceptions, untrue. Muslim tolerance of unbelievers and misbelievers was far better than anything available in Christendom until the rise of secularism in the 17th century.
Muslim fighters are commanded not to kill women, children, or the aged unless they attack first; not to torture or otherwise ill-treat prisoners; to give fair warnings of the opening of hostilities or their resumption after a truce; and to honor agreements. At no time did the classical jurists offer any approval or legitimacy to what we nowadays call terrorism. Nor indeed is there any evidence of the use of terrorism as it is practiced nowadays.
The emergence of the by now widespread terrorism practice of suicide bombing is a development of the 20th century. It has no antecedents in Islamic history, and no justification in the terms of Islamic theology, law, or tradition.}}As'ad AbuKhalil, has criticized this view and stated: "Methodologically, [Lewis] insists that terrorism by individual Muslims should be considered Islamic terrorism, while terrorism by individual Jews or Christians is never considered Jewish or Christian terrorism."AbuKhalil, 2004, p. [https://www.scribd.com/document/169838430/bernard-lewis 134]
He also criticised Lewis's understanding of Osama bin Laden, seeing Lewis's interpretation of bin Laden "as some kind of influential Muslim theologian" along the lines of classical theologians like Al-Ghazali, rather than "the terrorist fanatic that he is". AbuKhalil has also criticized the place of Islam in Lewis's worldview more generally, arguing that the most prominent feature of his work was its "theologocentrism" (borrowing a term from Maxime Rodinson)—that Lewis interprets all aspects of behavior among Muslims solely through the lens of Islamic theology, subsuming the study of Muslim peoples, their languages, the geographical areas where Muslims predominate, Islamic governments, the governments of Arab countries and Sharia under the label of "Islam".
= Debates with Edward Said =
Lewis was known for his literary debates with Edward Said, the Palestinian American literary theorist whose aim was to analyze and criticize Orientalist scholarship. Said, who was a professor at Columbia University, characterized Lewis's work as a prime example of Orientalism in his 1978 book Orientalism and in his later book Covering Islam: How the Media and the Experts Determine How We See the Rest of the World (1981).{{cite book |last=Said |first=Edward |title=Covering Islam: How the Media and the Experts Determine How We See the Rest of the World |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=NJVKCgAAQBAJ |year=1997 |orig-date=1981 |publisher=Random House |location=New York |isbn=978-0-679-75890-7 |pages=xxx–xxxi}} Said asserted that the field of Orientalism was political intellectualism bent on self-affirmation rather than objective study,{{cite book|last1=Said|first1=Edward W.|title=Orientalism|date=1979|publisher=Vintage Books|location=New York|isbn=978-0-394-74067-6|page=12}} a form of racism, and a tool of imperialist domination.{{cite journal|last1=Windschuttle|first1=Keith|title=Edward Said's "Orientalism" Revisited|journal=The New Criterion|date=January 1999|volume=17|page=30|url=http://www.newcriterion.com/articles.cfm/Edward-Said-s--ldquo-Orientalism-rdquo--revisited-2937|access-date=27 February 2015}} He further questioned the scientific neutrality of some leading Middle East scholars, including Lewis, on the Arab World. In an interview with Al-Ahram weekly, Said suggested that Lewis's knowledge of the Middle East was so biased that it could not be taken seriously and claimed "Bernard Lewis hasn't set foot in the Middle East, in the Arab world, for at least 40 years. He knows something about Turkey, I'm told, but he knows nothing about the Arab world."{{cite news|title=Resources of Hope |url=http://weekly.ahram.org.eg/2003/631/focus.htm |access-date=27 February 2015 |work=Al-Ahram Weekly |issue=631 |date=2 April 2003 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150221221020/http://weekly.ahram.org.eg/2003/631/focus.htm |archive-date=21 February 2015 }} Said considered that Lewis treats Islam as a monolithic entity without the nuance of its plurality, internal dynamics, and historical complexities, and accused him of "demagogy and downright ignorance".{{cite news|last1=Said|first1=Edward W.|title=The Clash of Ignorance|url=http://www.thenation.com/article/clash-ignorance#|access-date=27 February 2015|work=The Nation|date=4 October 2001}} In Covering Islam, Said argued that "Lewis simply cannot deal with the diversity of Muslim, much less human life, because it is closed to him as something foreign, radically different, and other," and he criticised Lewis's "inability to grant that the Islamic peoples are entitled to their own cultural, political, and historical practices, free from Lewis's calculated attempt to show that because they are not Western... they can't be good."
Rejecting the view that Western scholarship was biased against the Middle East, Lewis responded that Orientalism developed as a facet of European humanism, independently of the past European imperial expansion. He noted the French and English pursued the study of Islam in the 16th and 17th centuries, yet not in an organized way, but long before they had any control or hope of control in the Middle East; and that much of Orientalist study did nothing to advance the cause of imperialism. In his 1993 book Islam and the West, Lewis wrote "What imperial purpose was served by deciphering the ancient Egyptian language, for example, and then restoring to the Egyptians knowledge of and pride in their forgotten, ancient past?"{{cite book|last1=Lewis|first1=Bernard|title=Islam and the West|date=1993|publisher=Oxford University Press|location=New York City|isbn=978-0-19-509061-1|page=[https://archive.org/details/islamwest00lewi_0/page/126 126]|url=https://archive.org/details/islamwest00lewi_0/page/126}}
Furthermore, Lewis accused Said of politicizing the scientific study of the Middle East (and Arabic studies in particular); neglecting to critique the scholarly findings of the Orientalists; and giving "free rein" to his biases.{{cite magazine|last1=Lewis|first1=Bernard|title=The Question of Orientalism|url=https://www.amherst.edu/media/view/307584/original/The+Question+of+Orientalism+by+Bernard+Lewis+%7C+The+New+York+Review+of+Books.pdf|magazine=New York Review of Books|access-date=17 December 2017|date=24 June 1982}}
= Stance on the Iraq War =
In 2002, Lewis wrote an article for The Wall Street Journal regarding the buildup to the Iraq War entitled "Time for Toppling", where he stated his opinion that "a regime change may well be dangerous, but sometimes the dangers of inaction are greater than those of action".{{cite news|last1=Lewis|first1=Bernard|title=Time for Toppling|url=https://www.wsj.com/news/articles/SB1033089910971012713|access-date=24 February 2015|work=The Wall Street Journal|date=27 September 2002}} In 2007, Jacob Weisberg described Lewis as "perhaps the most significant intellectual influence behind the invasion of Iraq".{{cite news|url=http://www.slate.com/id/2161800|title=AEI's Weird Celebration|first=Jacob|last=Weisberg|work=Slate Magazine|date=14 March 2007|access-date=24 February 2015}} Michael Hirsh attributed to Lewis the view that regime change in Iraq would provide a jolt that would "modernize the Middle East" and suggested that Lewis's allegedly 'orientalist' theories about "what went wrong" in the Middle East, and other writings, formed the intellectual basis of the push towards war in Iraq. Hirsch reported that Lewis had told him in an interview that he viewed the 11 September attacks as "the opening salvo of the final battle" between Western and Islamic civilisations: Lewis believed that a forceful response was necessary. In the run up to the Iraq War, he met with Vice President Dick Cheney several times: Hirsch quoted an unnamed official who was present at a number of these meetings, who summarised Lewis's view of Iraq as "Get on with it. Don't dither". Brent Scowcroft quoted Lewis as stating that he believed "that one of the things you've got to do to Arabs is hit them between the eyes with a big stick. They respect power".{{cite web |url=https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2005/10/31/breaking-ranks|title=Breaking Ranks |last=Goldberg |first=Jeffrey|author-link=Jeffrey Goldberg|date=31 October 2005|website=New Yorker|access-date=30 June 2018}} As'ad AbuKhalil has claimed that Lewis assured Cheney that American troops would be welcomed by Iraqis and Arabs, relying on the opinion of his colleague Fouad Ajami.{{cite web |url=https://consortiumnews.com/2018/06/29/the-legacy-and-fallacies-of-bernard-lewis/|title=The Legacy and Fallacies of Bernard Lewis |last=AbuKhalil |first=As'ad|author-link=As'ad AbuKhalil |website=consortiumnews.com |date=29 June 2018 |access-date=30 June 2018}} Hirsch also drew parallels between the Bush administration's plans for post-invasion Iraq and Lewis's views, in particular his admiration for Mustafa Kemal Atatürk's secularist and Westernising reforms in the new Republic of Turkey which emerged from the collapse of the Ottoman Empire.{{cite news|last1=Hirsh |first1=Michael |title=Bernard Lewis Revisited |url=https://washingtonmonthly.com/2004/11/01/bernard-lewis-revisited/ |work=Washington Monthly |access-date=24 February 2015 |date=November 2004 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140108162236/http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2004/0411.hirsh.html |archive-date=8 January 2014 }}
Writing in 2008, Lewis did not advocate imposing freedom and democracy on Islamic nations. "There are things you can't impose. Freedom, for example. Or democracy. Democracy is a very strong medicine which has to be administered to the patient in small, gradually increasing doses. Otherwise, you risk killing the patient. In the main, the Muslims have to do it themselves."{{cite news|last1=Leibowitz|first1=Ruthie Blum|title=One on One: When Defeat Means Liberation|url=http://www.jpost.com/Magazine/Features/One-on-One-When-defeat-means-liberation|access-date=24 February 2015|work=The Jerusalem Post|date=6 March 2008}}
Ian Buruma, writing for The New Yorker in an article subtitled "The two Minds of Bernard Lewis", finds Lewis's stance on the war difficult to reconcile with Lewis's past statements cautioning democracy enforcement in the world at large. Buruma ultimately rejects suggestions by his peers that Lewis promotes war with Iraq to safeguard Israel, but instead concludes "perhaps he loves it [the Arab world] too much":
{{blockquote|It is a common phenomenon among Western students of the Orient to fall in love with a civilization. Such love often ends in bitter impatience when reality fails to conform to the ideal. The rage, in this instance, is that of the Western scholar. His beloved civilization is sick. And what would be more heartwarming to an old Orientalist than to see the greatest Western democracy cure the benighted Muslim? It is either that or something less charitable: if a final showdown between the great religions is indeed the inevitable result of a millennial clash, then we had better make sure that we win.{{cite magazine|last1=Buruma|first1=Ian|title=Lost in Translation: The Two Minds of Bernard Lewis|url=https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2004/06/14/lost-in-translation-3?currentPage=all|magazine=The New Yorker|access-date=24 February 2015|date=14 June 2004}}}}
Hamid Dabashi, writing on 28 May 2018, in an article subtitled "On Bernard Lewis and 'his extraordinary capacity for getting everything wrong'", asked: "Just imagine: What sort of a person would spend a lifetime studying people he loathes? It is quite a bizarre proposition. But there you have it: the late Bernard Lewis did precisely that." Similarly, Richard Bulliet described Lewis as "...a person who does not like the people he is purporting to have expertise about...he doesn't respect them, he considers them to be good and worthy only to the degree they follow a Western path". According to As'ad AbuKhalil, "Lewis has poisoned the Middle East academic field more than any other Orientalist and his influence has been both academic and political. But there is a new generation of Middle East experts in the West who now see clearly the political agenda of Bernard Lewis. It was fully exposed in the Bush years."[https://english.al-akhbar.com/node/14409 Bernard Lewis and His Reputation] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180612143000/https://english.al-akhbar.com/node/14409 |date=12 June 2018 }} by As'ad AbuKhalil, 17 December 2012
= Alleged nuclear threat from Iran =
In 2006, Lewis wrote that Iran had been working on a nuclear weapon for fifteen years. In August 2006, in an article about whether the world can rely on the concept of mutual assured destruction as a deterrent in its dealings with Iran, Lewis wrote in The Wall Street Journal about the significance of 22 August 2006 in the Islamic calendar. The Iranian president had indicated he would respond by that date to U.S. demands regarding Iran's development of nuclear power. Lewis wrote that the date corresponded to the 27th day of the month of Rajab of the year 1427, the day Muslims commemorate the night flight of Muhammad from Jerusalem to heaven and back. Lewis wrote that it would be "an appropriate date for the apocalyptic ending of Israel and, if necessary, of the world".{{cite news|last1=Lewis|first1=Bernard|title=August 22|url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB115500154638829470 |url-access=subscription |access-date=26 February 2015|work=The Wall Street Journal|date=8 August 2006|quote=What is the significance of Aug. 22? This year, Aug. 22 corresponds, in the Islamic calendar, to the 27th day of the month of Rajab of the year 1427. This, by tradition, is the night when many Muslims commemorate the night flight of Muhammad on the winged horse Buraq, first to "the farthest mosque," usually identified with Jerusalem, and then to heaven and back[Quran 17:1]. This might well be deemed an appropriate date for the apocalyptic ending of Israel and if necessary of the world. It is far from certain that Mr. Ahmadinejad plans any such cataclysmic events precisely for 22 Aug.. But it would be wise to bear the possibility in mind.}} According to Lewis, mutual assured destruction is not an effective deterrent in the case of Iran, because of what Lewis describes as the Iranian leadership's "apocalyptic worldview" and the "suicide or martyrdom complex that plagues parts of the Islamic world today".{{cite news|last1=Greene|first1=Thomas C.|title=Nuclear Holocaust Starts Today: WSJ|url=https://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/08/21/iran_brings_it_on/|access-date=26 February 2015|work=The Register|date=21 August 2006}} Lewis's article received significant press coverage.{{cite news|last1=Eslocker|first1=Asa|title=August 22: Doomsday?|url=https://abcnews.go.com/blogs/headlines/2006/08/is_tomorrow_doo/|access-date=26 February 2015|work=ABC News|date=21 August 2006}}{{cite news|last1=Krieger|first1=Hilary Leila|title=Apocalypse Now?|url=http://www.jpost.com/Iranian-Threat/News/Apocalypse-now|access-date=26 February 2015|work=Jerusalem Post|date=22 August 2006}} However, the day passed without any incident.{{cite news|last1=Greene|first1=Thomas C.|title=Nuclear Apocalypse Milder Than Expected: Back to the Ouija Board |url=https://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/08/23/lucky_to_be_alive/|access-date=26 February 2015|work=The Register|date=23 August 2006}}{{cite news|last1=Gawenda|first1=Michael|title=World Survives, But Solution on Iran is No Closer|url=http://www.smh.com.au/news/world/world-survives-but-solution-on-iran-is-no-closer/2006/08/25/1156012739245.html|access-date=26 February 2015|work=Sydney Morning Herald|date=26 August 2006}}[https://foreignpolicy.com/2006/08/30/one-week-and-still-no-nuclear-apocalypse/ One week...and still no nuclear apocalypse], Aditya Dasgupta, 30 August 2006, Foreign Policy
Death
Bernard Lewis died on 19 May 2018 at the age of 101, at an assisted-living care facility in Voorhees Township, New Jersey, twelve days before his 102nd birthday.{{cite news|last1=Murphy|first1=Brian|title=Bernard Lewis, eminent historian of the Middle East, dies at 101|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/obituaries/bernard-lewis-eminent-historian-of-the-middle-east-dies-at-101/2018/05/19/4f0db6b8-5bad-11e8-8836-a4a123c359ab_story.html?noredirect=on|access-date=19 May 2018|date=19 May 2018|newspaper=The Washington Post}}
He is buried in Trumpeldor Cemetery in Tel Aviv.{{cite news|last1=Kramer|first1=Martin|title=Bernard Lewis rests among the greats|url=https://www.jns.org/opinion/bernard-lewis-rests-among-the-greats|access-date=26 July 2019|date=26 July 2018|newspaper=JNS}}
Bibliography
{{Main|Bernard Lewis bibliography}}
{{refbegin}}
- {{cite book|first=Bernard|last=Lewis|title=The Assassins: A Radical Sect in Islam|date=1967|publisher=Weidenfeld & Nicolson|location=London}}
- {{cite book|first=Bernard|last=Lewis|title=Race and color in Islam|date=1971|publisher=Harper & Row|location=New York}}
- {{cite book|first=Bernard|last=Lewis|title=The Jews of Islam|date=1984|publisher=Princeton University Press|location=Princeton|isbn=978-0-691-16087-0|url=https://books.google.com/books?isbn=0691008078}}
- {{cite book|first=Bernard|last=Lewis|title=The Political Language of Islam|date=1988|publisher=University of Chicago Press|location=Chicago}}
- {{cite book|first=Bernard|last=Lewis|title=Race and slavery in the Middle East: an historical enquiry|date=1992|publisher=Oxford University Press|location=New York|isbn=978-0-19-505326-5|url=https://archive.org/details/raceslaveryinmid0000lewi|url-access=registration}}
- {{cite book|first=Bernard|last=Lewis|title=The Middle East: A Brief History of the Last 2,000 Years|date=1995|publisher=Scribner|location=New York|isbn=978-0-684-80712-6|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=CjAABdA9z18C}}
- {{cite book|last=Lewis|first=Bernard|title=The Multiple Identities of the Middle East|date=1999|publisher=Schocken Books|isbn=978-0-8052-4172-3|url=https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/7509079-the-multiple-identities-of-the-middle-east}}
- {{cite book|first=Bernard|last=Lewis|title=The Muslim Discovery of Europe|date=2001|publisher=W.W. Norton & Company|location=New York|isbn=978-0-393-32165-4|url=https://archive.org/details/muslimdiscoveryo00lewi|url-access=registration}} - Article on book: The Muslim Discovery of Europe
- {{cite book|first=Bernard|last=Lewis|title=What Went Wrong?|date=2002|publisher=Oxford University Press|location=New York|isbn=978-0-06-051605-5|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=0O9jARjPYlYC}}
- {{cite book|first=Bernard|last=Lewis|title=From Babel to Dragomans: Interpreting The Middle East|date=2004|publisher=Oxford University Press|location=New York|isbn=978-0-19-517336-9|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=7S8MAAAAQBAJ|ref=none}}
- {{cite book|last1=Lewis|first1=Bernard|last2=Churchill|first2=Buntzie Ellis|title=Islam: The Religion and the People|date=2008|publisher=Wharton Press|location=Indianapolis|isbn=978-0-13-223085-8|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=IVyMAvW9slYC}}
- {{cite book|last1=Lewis|first1=Bernard|last2=Churchill|first2=Buntzie Ellis|title=Notes on a century: reflections of a Middle East historian|date=2012|publisher=Viking Penguin|location=New York|isbn=978-0-670-02353-0|url=https://archive.org/details/notesoncenturyre0000lewi|url-access=registration}}
{{refend}}
Awards and honors
- 1963: Elected as a Fellow of the British Academy
- 1973: Elected to the American Philosophical Society{{Cite web |title=APS Member History |url=https://search.amphilsoc.org/memhist/search?creator=Bernard+Lewis&title=&subject=&subdiv=&mem=&year=&year-max=&dead=&keyword=&smode=advanced |access-date=15 August 2022 |website=search.amphilsoc.org}}
- 1978: The Harvey Prize, from the Technion – Israel Institute of Technology, for "his profound insight into the life and mores of the peoples of the Middle East through his writings"{{cite web |title=Prize Winners |url=https://harveypz.net.technion.ac.il/harvey-prize-laureates/ |website=harveypz.net.technion.ac.il |publisher=Technion – Israel Institute of Technology |access-date=7 September 2020}}
- 1983: Elected to the American Academy of Arts and Sciences{{cite web |title=Bernard Lewis |url=https://www.amacad.org/person/bernard-lewis |website=amacad.org |publisher=American Academy of Arts & Sciences |access-date=7 September 2020}}
- 1990: Selected for the Jefferson Lecture by the National Endowment for the Humanities
- 1996: Finalist for the National Book Critics Circle Award in General Nonfiction, for The Middle East (Scribner){{cite web |title=The National Book Critics Circle Award: 1996 Winners & Finalists |url=https://www.bookcritics.org/past-awards/1996/ |website=bookcritics.org |publisher=National Book Critics Circle |access-date=8 September 2020}}
- 1999: National Jewish Book Award in the Israel category for The Multiple Identities of the Middle East{{Cite web|url=https://www.jewishbookcouncil.org/awards/national-jewish-book-awards/past-winners?category=30759|title=Past Winners|website=Jewish Book Council|language=en|access-date=22 January 2020}}
- 2002: The Thomas Jefferson Medal, awarded by the American Philosophical Society{{cite web |title=Thomas Jefferson Medal for Distinguished Achievement in the Arts, Humanities, and Social Sciences |url=https://www.amphilsoc.org/prizes/thomas-jefferson-medal-distinguished-achievement-arts-humanities-and-social-sciences |website=amphilsoc.org |publisher=American Philosophical Society |access-date=7 September 2020}}
- 2002: Atatürk International Peace Prize on grounds that he contributed extensively to history scholarship with his accurate analysis of Turkey's and in particular of Atatürk's positive impact on Middle Eastern history.{{Cite web|title=Ataturk Peace Prize to Bernard Lewis|url=http://www.ataturksociety.org/ataturk-awards/}}
- 2004: Golden Plate Award from the American Academy of Achievement{{cite web|title= Golden Plate Awardees of the American Academy of Achievement |website=www.achievement.org|publisher=American Academy of Achievement|url= https://achievement.org/our-history/golden-plate-awards/#public-service}}
- 2006: National Humanities Medal, from the National Endowment for the Humanities{{cite web |title=President Bush Awards the 2006 National Humanities Medals |url=https://www.neh.gov/news/press-release/2006-11-08 |website=neh.gov |publisher=National Endowment for the Humanities |access-date=7 September 2020}}
- 2007: Irving Kristol Award, from the American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research
- 2007: The Scholar-Statesman Award from The Washington Institute for Near East Policy{{cite web |title=Scholar-Statesman Award Dinner |url=https://www.washingtoninstitute.org/support/scholar-statesman |website=washingtoninstitute.org |publisher=The Washington Institute for Near East Policy |access-date=8 September 2020}}
See also
References
{{reflist|30em}}
External links
{{Wikiquote}}
{{Commons category|Bernard Lewis}}
- {{IMDb name|2217773}}
- {{OL author}}
- [https://nes.princeton.edu/people/bernard-lewis Lewis's page at Princeton University] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210305051410/https://nes.princeton.edu/people/bernard-lewis |date=5 March 2021 }}
- [http://www.momentmag.com/revered-and-reviled-bernard-lewis/ Revered and Reviled] – Lewis's profile on Moment Magazine
- [https://consortiumnews.com/2018/06/29/the-legacy-and-fallacies-of-bernard-lewis/#comments The Legacy and Fallacies of Bernard Lewis] by As'ad AbuKhalil
- {{C-SPAN|17611}}
{{Neoconservatism}}
{{Authority control}}
{{DEFAULTSORT:Lewis, Bernard}}
Category:20th-century American historians
Category:20th-century British historians
Category:20th-century British male writers
Category:21st-century American historians
Category:21st-century American male writers
Category:21st-century British historians
Category:21st-century British male writers
Category:Academics of SOAS University of London
Category:Alumni of SOAS University of London
Category:American men centenarians
Category:American male non-fiction writers
Category:American people of English-Jewish descent
Category:Deniers of the Armenian genocide
Category:British Army personnel of World War II
Category:British emigrants to the United States
Category:Fellows of the British Academy
Category:American historians of Islam
Category:British historians of Islam
Category:Scholars of Ottoman history
Category:Honorary members of the Turkish Academy of Sciences
Category:Institute for Advanced Study visiting scholars
Category:Intelligence Corps soldiers
Category:Jewish American historians
Category:Jewish scholars of Islam
Category:Middle Eastern studies in the United States
Category:National Humanities Medal recipients
Category:People from Stoke Newington
Category:British political commentators
Category:Princeton University faculty
Category:Royal Armoured Corps soldiers
Category:Scholars of antisemitism
Category:University of Paris alumni
Category:Cornell University faculty
Category:Foreign Policy Research Institute
Category:Historians of the Middle East
Category:Carnegie Council for Ethics in International Affairs
Category:Middle Eastern studies scholars
Category:Burials at Trumpeldor Cemetery
Category:Members of the American Philosophical Society
Category:Recipients of the Order of Merit of the Republic of Turkey