:Ionic radius

{{Short description|Radius of an atomic ion in crystals}}

{{Atomic radius}}

Ionic radius, rion, is the radius of a monatomic ion in an ionic crystal structure. Although neither atoms nor ions have sharp boundaries, they are treated as if they were hard spheres with radii such that the sum of ionic radii of the cation and anion gives the distance between the ions in a crystal lattice. Ionic radii are typically given in units of either picometers (pm) or angstroms (Å), with 1 Å = 100 pm. Typical values range from 31 pm (0.3 Å) to over 200 pm (2 Å).

The concept can be extended to solvated ions in liquid solutions taking into consideration the solvation shell.

Trends

class="wikitable" width=290px style="float:right;margin-left:0.5em;"

!align=left|X!!NaX!!AgX

F464492
Cl564555
Br598577
colspan=3 |Unit cell parameters (in pm, equal to two M–X bond lengths) for sodium and silver halides. All compounds crystallize in the NaCl structure.

File:Atomic & ionic radii.svg

Ions may be larger or smaller than the neutral atom, depending on the ion's electric charge. When an atom loses an electron to form a cation, the other electrons are more attracted to the nucleus, and the radius of the ion gets smaller. Similarly, when an electron is added to an atom, forming an anion, the added electron increases the size of the electron cloud by interelectronic repulsion.

The ionic radius is not a fixed property of a given ion, but varies with coordination number, spin state and other parameters. Nevertheless, ionic radius values are sufficiently transferable to allow periodic trends to be recognized. As with other types of atomic radius, ionic radii increase on descending a group. Ionic size (for the same ion) also increases with increasing coordination number, and an ion in a high-spin state will be larger than the same ion in a low-spin state. In general, ionic radius decreases with increasing positive charge and increases with increasing negative charge.

An "anomalous" ionic radius in a crystal is often a sign of significant covalent character in the bonding. No bond is completely ionic, and some supposedly "ionic" compounds, especially of the transition metals, are particularly covalent in character. This is illustrated by the unit cell parameters for sodium and silver halides in the table. On the basis of the fluorides, one would say that Ag+ is larger than Na+, but on the basis of the chlorides and bromides the opposite appears to be true.On the basis of conventional ionic radii, Ag+ (129 pm) is indeed larger than Na+ (116 pm) This is because the greater covalent character of the bonds in AgCl and AgBr reduces the bond length and hence the apparent ionic radius of Ag+, an effect which is not present in the halides of the more electropositive sodium, nor in silver fluoride in which the fluoride ion is relatively unpolarizable.

Determination

The distance between two ions in an ionic crystal can be determined by X-ray crystallography, which gives the lengths of the sides of the unit cell of a crystal. For example, the length of each edge of the unit cell of sodium chloride is found to be 564.02 pm. Each edge of the unit cell of sodium chloride may be considered to have the atoms arranged as Na+∙∙∙Cl∙∙∙Na+, so the edge is twice the Na-Cl separation. Therefore, the distance between the Na+ and Cl ions is half of 564.02 pm, which is 282.01 pm. However, although X-ray crystallography gives the distance between ions, it doesn't indicate where the boundary is between those ions, so it doesn't directly give ionic radii.

File:LiI unit cell, front.png

Landé{{cite journal|last=Landé|first=A.|title=Über die Größe der Atome|journal=Zeitschrift für Physik|year=1920|volume=1|issue=3|pages=191–197|doi=10.1007/BF01329165|url=http://springerlink.com/content/j862631p43032333/|access-date=1 June 2011|bibcode=1920ZPhy....1..191L|s2cid=124873960|archive-url=https://archive.today/20130203054518/http://springerlink.com/content/j862631p43032333/|archive-date=3 February 2013|url-status=dead}} estimated ionic radii by considering crystals in which the anion and cation have a large difference in size, such as LiI. The lithium ions are so much smaller than the iodide ions that the lithium fits into holes within the crystal lattice, allowing the iodide ions to touch. That is, the distance between two neighboring iodides in the crystal is assumed to be twice the radius of the iodide ion, which was deduced to be 214 pm. This value can be used to determine other radii. For example, the inter-ionic distance in RbI is 356 pm, giving 142 pm for the ionic radius of Rb+. In this way values for the radii of 8 ions were determined.

Wasastjerna estimated ionic radii by considering the relative volumes of ions as determined from electrical polarizability as determined by measurements of refractive index.{{cite journal|last=Wasastjerna|first=J. A.|title=On the radii of ions|journal=Comm. Phys.-Math., Soc. Sci. Fenn.|year=1923|volume=1|issue=38|pages=1–25}} These results were extended by Victor Goldschmidt.{{cite book|last=Goldschmidt|first=V. M.|title=Geochemische Verteilungsgesetze der Elemente|year=1926|publisher=Skrifter Norske Videnskaps—Akad. Oslo, (I) Mat. Natur.}} This is an 8 volume set of books by Goldschmidt. Both Wasastjerna and Goldschmidt used a value of 132 pm for the O2− ion.

Pauling used effective nuclear charge to proportion the distance between ions into anionic and a cationic radii.Pauling, L. (1960). The Nature of the Chemical Bond (3rd Edn.). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. His data gives the O2− ion a radius of 140 pm.

A major review of crystallographic data led to the publication of revised ionic radii by Shannon.{{cite journal|doi=10.1107/S0567739476001551|title=Revised effective ionic radii and systematic studies of interatomic distances in halides and chalcogenides|author=R. D. Shannon|journal=Acta Crystallogr A|volume=32|issue=5|year=1976|pages=751–767|bibcode = 1976AcCrA..32..751S |doi-access=free}} Shannon gives different radii for different coordination numbers, and for high and low spin states of the ions. To be consistent with Pauling's radii, Shannon has used a value of rion(O2−) = 140 pm; data using that value are referred to as "effective" ionic radii. However, Shannon also includes data based on rion(O2−) = 126 pm; data using that value are referred to as "crystal" ionic radii. Shannon states that "it is felt that crystal radii correspond more closely to the physical size of ions in a solid." The two sets of data are listed in the two tables below.

Tables

class="wikitable sortable"

|+ Crystal ionic radii in pm of elements as a function of ionic charge and spin (ls = low spin, hs = high spin).
Ions are 6-coordinate unless indicated differently in parentheses (e.g. "146 (4)" for 4-coordinate N3−).

Number

!Name

!Symbol

!3−

!2−

!1−

!1+

!2+

!3+

!4+

!5+

!6+

!7+

!8+

1

|Hydrogen

|H

|

208−4 (2)
3

|Lithium

|Li

|

90
4

|Beryllium

|Be

|59
5

|Boron

|B

|41
6

|Carbon

|C

30
7

|Nitrogen

|N

132 (4)3027
8

|Oxygen

|O

|126
9

|Fluorine

|F

|119|22
11

|Sodium

|Na

|

116
12

|Magnesium

|Mg

|

86
13

|Aluminium

|Al

67.5|
14

|Silicon

|Si

54|
15

|Phosphorus

|P

58 52|
16

|Sulfur

|S

|170|5143|
17

|Chlorine

|Cl

|167|26 (3py)|41
19

|Potassium

|K

|152|
20

|Calcium

|Ca

|114|
21

|Scandium

|Sc

|88.5|
22

|Titanium

|Ti

|1008174.5|
23

|Vanadium

|V

|93787268|
24

|Chromium ls

|Cr

|8775.5696358|
24

|Chromium hs

|Cr

|94|
25

|Manganese ls

|Mn

|81726747 (4)39.5 (4)60
25

|Manganese hs

|Mn

|9778.5
26

|Iron ls

|Fe

|756972.539 (4)
26

|Iron hs

|Fe

|9278.5
27

|Cobalt ls

|Co

|7968.5
27

|Cobalt hs

|Co

|88.57567
28

|Nickel ls

|Ni

|837062
28

|Nickel hs

|Ni

|74
29

|Copper

|Cu

|918768 ls
30

|Zinc

|Zn

|88|
31

|Gallium

|Ga

|76|
32

|Germanium

|Ge

|8767|
33

|Arsenic

|As

|7260|
34

|Selenium

|Se

|184|6456
35

|Bromine

|Br

|182|73 (4sq)45 (3py)53
37

|Rubidium

|Rb

|166|
38

|Strontium

|Sr

|132|
39

|Yttrium

|Y

|104|
40

|Zirconium

|Zr

|86|
41

|Niobium

|Nb

|868278|
42

|Molybdenum

|Mo

|83797573|
43

|Technetium

|Tc

|78.57470|
44

|Ruthenium

|Ru

|827670.552 (4)50 (4)
45

|Rhodium

| Rh

|80.57469
46

| Palladium

| Pd

|73 (2)1009075.5
47

| Silver

| Ag

|12910889
48

| Cadmium

| Cd

109
49

| Indium

| In

94
50

| Tin

| Sn

83
51

| Antimony

| Sb

9074
52

| Tellurium

| Te

|207|11170
53

| Iodine

| I

|206|10967
54

| Xenon

| Xe

62
55

| Caesium

| Cs

|181|
56

| Barium

| Ba

|149|
57

| Lanthanum

| La

|117.2|
58

| Cerium

| Ce

|115101|
59

| Praseodymium

| Pr

|11399|
60

| Neodymium

| Nd

|143 (8)112.3|
61

| Promethium

| Pm

|111|
62

| Samarium

| Sm

|136 (7)109.8|
63

| Europium

| Eu

|131108.7|
64

| Gadolinium

| Gd

|107.8|
65

| Terbium

| Tb

|106.390|
66

| Dysprosium

| Dy

|121105.2|
67

| Holmium

| Ho

|104.1|
68

| Erbium

| Er

|103|
69

| Thulium

| Tm

|117102|
70

| Ytterbium

| Yb

|116100.8|
71

| Lutetium

| Lu

|100.1|
72

| Hafnium

| Hf

|85|
73

| Tantalum

| Ta

|868278|
74

| Tungsten

| W

|807674|
75

| Rhenium

| Re

|77726967|
76

| Osmium

|Os

|7771.568.566.553 (4)
77

| Iridium

| Ir

|8276.571|
78

| Platinum

| Pt

|9476.571|
79

| Gold

| Au

|1519971|
80

| Mercury

| Hg

|133116|
81

| Thallium

| Tl

|164102.5|
82

| Lead

| Pb

|13391.5|
83

| Bismuth

| Bi

|11790|
84

| Polonium

| Po

|10881|
85

| Astatine

| At

|76|
87

| Francium

| Fr

|194|
88

| Radium

| Ra

|162 (8)|
89

|Actinium

| Ac

|126|
90

| Thorium

| Th

|108|
91

| Protactinium

| Pa

|11610492|
92

| Uranium

| U

|116.51039087|
93

| Neptunium

| Np

|124115101898685|
94

| Plutonium

| Pu

|1141008885|
95

| Americium

| Am

|140 (8)111.599|
96

| Curium

| Cm

|11199|
97

| Berkelium

| Bk

|11097|
98

| Californium

| Cf

|10996.1|
99

| Einsteinium

| Es

|92.8R. G. Haire, R. D. Baybarz: "Identification and Analysis of Einsteinium Sesquioxide by Electron Diffraction", in: Journal of Inorganic and Nuclear Chemistry, 1973, 35 (2), S. 489–496; {{doi|10.1016/0022-1902(73)80561-5}}.|

class="wikitable sortable"

|+ Effective ionic radii in pm of elements as a function of ionic charge and spin (ls = low spin, hs = high spin).
Ions are 6-coordinate unless indicated differently in parentheses (e.g. "146 (4)" for 4-coordinate N3−).

Number

!Name

!Symbol

!3−

!2−

!1−

!1+

!2+

!3+

!4+

!5+

!6+

!7+

!8+

1

|Hydrogen

|H

|

139.9−18 (2)
3

|Lithium

|Li

|76
4

|Beryllium

|Be

|45
5

|Boron

|B

|27
6

|Carbon

|C

|

16
7

|Nitrogen

|N

146 (4)1613
8

|Oxygen

|O

|140
9

|Fluorine

|F

|133|8
11

|Sodium

|Na

102|
12

|Magnesium

|Mg

72|
13

|Aluminium

|Al

53.5|
14

|Silicon

|Si

40|
15

|Phosphorus

|P

|212{{cite web |title=Atomic and Ionic Radius |url=https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Physical_and_Theoretical_Chemistry_Textbook_Maps/Supplemental_Modules_(Physical_and_Theoretical_Chemistry)/Physical_Properties_of_Matter/Atomic_and_Molecular_Properties/Atomic_and_Ionic_Radius |website=Chemistry LibreTexts|date=3 October 2013 }}

|44 38|
16

|Sulfur

|S

|184|3729|
17

|Chlorine

|Cl

|181|12 (3py)|27
19

|Potassium

|K

|138|
20

|Calcium

|Ca

|100|
21

|Scandium

|Sc

|74.5|
22

|Titanium

|Ti

|866760.5|
23

|Vanadium

|V

|79645854|
24

|Chromium ls

|Cr

|7361.5554944|
24

|Chromium hs

|Cr

|80|
25

|Manganese ls

|Mn

|67585333 (4)25.5 (4)46
25

|Manganese hs

|Mn

|8364.5
26

|Iron ls

|Fe

|615558.525 (4)
26

|Iron hs

|Fe

|7864.5
27

|Cobalt ls

|Co

|6554.5
27

|Cobalt hs

|Co

|74.56153
28

|Nickel ls

|Ni

|695648
28

|Nickel hs

|Ni

|60
29

|Copper

|Cu

|777354 ls
30

|Zinc

|Zn

|74|
31

|Gallium

|Ga

|62|
32

|Germanium

|Ge

|7353|
33

|Arsenic

|As

|5846|
34

|Selenium

|Se

|198|5042
35

|Bromine

|Br

|196|59 (4sq)31 (3py)39
37

|Rubidium

|Rb

|152|
38

|Strontium

|Sr

|118|
39

|Yttrium

|Y

|90|
40

|Zirconium

|Zr

|72|
41

|Niobium

|Nb

|726864|
42

|Molybdenum

|Mo

|69656159|
43

|Technetium

|Tc

|64.56056|
44

|Ruthenium

|Ru

|686256.538 (4)36 (4)
45

|Rhodium

| Rh

|66.56055
46

| Palladium

| Pd

|59 (2)867661.5
47

| Silver

| Ag

|1159475
48

| Cadmium

| Cd

95
49

| Indium

| In

80
50

| Tin

| Sn

102{{cite journal |last1=Sidey |first1=V. |title=On the effective ionic radii for the tin(II) cation |journal=Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids |date=December 2022 |volume=171 |issue=110992 |doi=10.1016/j.jpcs.2022.110992 |url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022369722004097|doi-access=free }}69
51

| Antimony

| Sb

7660
52

| Tellurium

| Te

|221|9756
53

| Iodine

| I

|220|9553
54

| Xenon

| Xe

48
55

| Caesium

| Cs

|167|
56

| Barium

| Ba

|135|
57

| Lanthanum

| La

|103.2|
58

| Cerium

| Ce

|10187|
59

| Praseodymium

| Pr

|9985|
60

| Neodymium

| Nd

|129 (8)98.3|
61

| Promethium

| Pm

|97|
62

| Samarium

| Sm

|122 (7)95.8|
63

| Europium

| Eu

|11794.7|
64

| Gadolinium

| Gd

|93.5|
65

| Terbium

| Tb

|92.376|
66

| Dysprosium

| Dy

|10791.2|
67

| Holmium

| Ho

|90.1|
68

| Erbium

| Er

|89|
69

| Thulium

| Tm

|10388|
70

| Ytterbium

| Yb

|10286.8|
71

| Lutetium

| Lu

|86.1|
72

| Hafnium

| Hf

|71|
73

| Tantalum

| Ta

|726864|
74

| Tungsten

| W

|666260|
75

| Rhenium

| Re

|63585553|
76

| Osmium

|Os

|6357.554.552.539 (4)
77

| Iridium

| Ir

|6862.557|
78

| Platinum

| Pt

|8062.557|
79

| Gold

| Au

|1378557|
80

| Mercury

| Hg

|119102|
81

| Thallium

| Tl

|15088.5|
82

| Lead

| Pb

|11977.5|
83

| Bismuth

| Bi

|10376|
84

| Polonium

| Po

|223{{citation|last=Shannon|first=R. D.|title=Revised Effective Ionic Radii and Systematic Studies of Interatomic Distances in Halides and Chalcogenides|journal=Acta Crystallogr. A|volume=32|issue=5|pages=751–67|year=1976|bibcode=1976AcCrA..32..751S|doi=10.1107/S0567739476001551|doi-access=free}}.9467|
85

| Astatine

| At

|62|
87

| Francium

| Fr

|180|
88

| Radium

| Ra

|148 (8)|
89

|Actinium

| Ac

|106.5 (6)
122.0 (9){{cite journal | last1=Deblonde | first1=Gauthier J.-P. | last2=Zavarin | first2=Mavrik | last3=Kersting | first3=Annie B. | author-link3=Annie Kersting|title=The coordination properties and ionic radius of actinium: A 120-year-old enigma | journal=Coordination Chemistry Reviews | publisher=Elsevier BV | volume=446 | year=2021 | issn=0010-8545 | doi=10.1016/j.ccr.2021.214130 | page=214130| doi-access=free }}
|
90

| Thorium

| Th

|94|
91

| Protactinium

| Pa

|1049078|
92

| Uranium

| U

|102.5897673|
93

| Neptunium

| Np

|11010187757271|
94

| Plutonium

| Pu

|100867471|
95

| Americium

| Am

|126 (8)97.585|
96

| Curium

| Cm

|9785|
97

| Berkelium

| Bk

|9683|
98

| Californium

| Cf

|9582.1|
99

| Einsteinium

| Es

|83.5|

Soft-sphere model

class="wikitable" style="float: right;"

|+Soft-sphere ionic radii (in pm) of some ions

Cation, M

!RM

!Anion, X

!RX

Li+

| 109.4

! Cl

| 218.1

Na+

| 149.7

! Br

| 237.2

For many compounds, the model of ions as hard spheres does not reproduce the distance between ions, {d_{mx}}, to the accuracy with which it can be measured in crystals. One approach to improving the calculated accuracy is to model ions as "soft spheres" that overlap in the crystal. Because the ions overlap, their separation in the crystal will be less than the sum of their soft-sphere radii.{{cite journal|last=Lang|first=Peter F.|author2=Smith, Barry C.|title=Ionic radii for Group 1 and Group 2 halide, hydride, fluoride, oxide, sulfide, selenide and telluride crystals|journal=Dalton Transactions|year=2010 |volume=39 |issue=33 |pages=7786–7791|doi = 10.1039/C0DT00401D|pmid=20664858|url=https://zenodo.org/record/1043348}}

The relation between soft-sphere ionic radii, {r_m} and {r_x}, and {d_{mx}}, is given by

:{d_{mx}}^k = {r_m}^k + {r_x}^k,

where k is an exponent that varies with the type of crystal structure. In the hard-sphere model, k would be 1, giving {d_{mx}} = {r_m} + {r_x}.

class="wikitable" style="text-align: center; float: right;"

|+Comparison between observed and calculated ion separations (in pm)

MX

! Observed

! Soft-sphere model

LiCl

| 257.0

| 257.2

LiBr

| 275.1

| 274.4

NaCl

| 282.0

| 281.9

NaBr

| 298.7

| 298.2

In the soft-sphere model, k has a value between 1 and 2.

For example, for crystals of group 1 halides with the sodium chloride structure, a value of 1.6667 gives good agreement with experiment.

Some soft-sphere ionic radii are in the table.

These radii are larger than the crystal radii given above (Li+, 90 pm; Cl, 167 pm). Inter-ionic separations calculated with these radii give remarkably good agreement with experimental values. Some data are given in the table. Curiously, no theoretical justification for the equation containing k has been given.

Non-spherical ions

The concept of ionic radii is based on the assumption of a spherical ion shape. However, from a group-theoretical point of view the assumption is only justified for ions that reside on high-symmetry crystal lattice sites like Na and Cl in halite or Zn and S in sphalerite. A clear distinction can be made, when the point symmetry group of the respective lattice site is considered,{{cite journal|author = H. Bethe|title = Termaufspaltung in Kristallen|journal = Annalen der Physik|volume = 3|issue = 2|pages = 133–208|year = 1929|doi = 10.1002/andp.19293950202|bibcode = 1929AnP...395..133B }} which are the cubic groups Oh and Td in NaCl and ZnS. For ions on lower-symmetry sites significant deviations of their electron density from a spherical shape may occur. This holds in particular for ions on lattice sites of polar symmetry, which are the crystallographic point groups C1, C1h, Cn or Cnv, n = 2, 3, 4 or 6.{{cite journal | author = M. Birkholz | title = Crystal-field induced dipoles in heteropolar crystals – I. concept | journal = Z. Phys. B | volume = 96 | issue = 3 | pages = 325–332 | year = 1995 | doi = 10.1007/BF01313054 |bibcode = 1995ZPhyB..96..325B | url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/227050494| citeseerx = 10.1.1.424.5632 | s2cid = 122527743 }} A thorough analysis of the bonding geometry was recently carried out for pyrite-type compounds, where monovalent chalcogen ions reside on C3 lattice sites. It was found that chalcogen ions have to be modeled by ellipsoidal charge distributions with different radii along the symmetry axis and perpendicular to it.{{cite journal | author = M. Birkholz | title = Modeling the Shape of Ions in Pyrite-Type Crystals | journal = Crystals | volume = 4 | issue = 3 | pages = 390–403 | year = 2014 | doi = 10.3390/cryst4030390 | doi-access = free }}

See also

References

{{reflist|30em}}