:Rotterdam Convention

{{Infobox Treaty

| name = Rotterdam Convention

| long_name = Rotterdam Convention on the Prior Informed Consent Procedure for Certain Hazardous Chemicals and Pesticides in International Trade

| image = Rotterdam Convention Secretariat.gif

| image_width = 130px

| caption = The logo of the Rotterdam Convention Secretariat

| type = United Nations treaty

| date_drafted =

| date_signed = 10 September 1998

| location_signed = Rotterdam, the Netherlands

| date_sealed =

| date_effective = 24 February 2004

| condition_effective = Ninety days after the ratification by at least 50 signatory states

| date_expiration =

| signatories = 72

| parties = 161

| depositor = Secretary-General of the United Nations

| language =

| languages = Arabic, Chinese, English, French, Russian, Spanish

| footnotes = http://www.pic.int/

| wikisource =

}}

The Rotterdam Convention (formally, the Rotterdam Convention on the Prior Informed Consent Procedure for Certain Hazardous Chemicals and Pesticides in International Trade) is a multilateral treaty to promote shared responsibilities in relation to importation of hazardous chemicals. The convention promotes open exchange of information and calls on exporters of hazardous chemicals to use proper labeling, include directions on safe handling, and inform purchasers of any known restrictions or bans. Signatory nations can decide whether to allow or ban the importation of chemicals listed in the treaty, and exporting countries are obliged to make sure that producers within their jurisdiction comply.

In 2012, the Secretariats of the Basel and Stockholm conventions, as well as the UNEP-part of the Rotterdam Convention Secretariat, merged to a single Secretariat with a matrix structure serving the three conventions.{{Cite web|url=http://www.brsmeas.org/Secretariat/Overview/tabid/3609/language/es-CO/Default.aspx|title=Joint Portal of the Basel, Rotterdam and Stockholm Conventions > Secretariat > Overview|website=brsmeas.org|access-date=2016-06-17}} The three conventions now hold back to back Conferences of the Parties as part of their joint synergies decisions.

The ninth meeting of the Rotterdam Conference{{Cite web|url=http://www.brsmeas.org/2019COPs/Overview/tabid/7523/language/en-US/Default.aspx/|title=Meetings of the conferences of the Parties to the Basel, Rotterdam and Stockholm conventions}} was held from 29 April to 10 May 2019 in Geneva, Switzerland.

Substances covered under the Convention

The following chemicals are listed in Annex III to the convention:{{cite web |title=Annex III Chemicals |url=http://www.pic.int/TheConvention/Chemicals/AnnexIIIChemicals/tabid/1132/ |website=pic.int |access-date=31 July 2020}}

2,4,5-T and its salts and esters
Alachlor
Aldicarb
Aldrin
Asbestos – Actinolite, Anthophyllite, Amosite, Crocidolite, and Tremolite only
Benomyl (certain formulations)
Binapacryl
Captafol
Carbofuran (certain formulations)
Chlordane
Chlordimeform
Chlorobenzilate
DDT
Dieldrin
Dinitro-ortho-cresol (DNOC) and its salts
Dinoseb and its salts and esters
1,2-dibromoethane (EDB)
Endosulfan
Ethylene dichloride
Ethylene oxide
Fluoroacetamide
Hexachlorocyclohexane (mixed isomers)
Heptachlor
Hexachlorobenzene
Lindane
Mercury compounds including inorganic and organometallic mercury compounds
Methamidophos (certain formulations)
Methyl parathion (certain formulations)
Monocrotophos
Parathion
Pentachlorophenol and its salts and esters
Phosphamidon (certain formulations)
Polybrominated biphenyls (PBBs)
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs)
Polychlorinated terphenyls (PCTs)
Terbufos
Tetraethyl lead
Tetramethyl lead
Thiram (certain formulations)
Toxaphene
Tributyltin compounds
Trichlorfon
Tris (2,3-dibromopropyl) phosphate (TRIS)

Substances recommended for addition to the Convention

The Chemical Review Committee of the Rotterdam Convention decided to recommend to the conference of the parties meeting that it consider the listing of the following chemicals in Annex III to the convention:{{Cite web |title=Recommended for listing |url=https://www.pic.int/TheConvention/Chemicals/Recommendedforlisting/tabid/1185/ |access-date=2023-10-19 |website=www.pic.int}}

Carbosulfan
Chrysotile asbestos
Fenthion (ultra low volume (ULV) formulations at or above 640 g active ingredient/L)
Liquid formulations (emulsifiable concentrate and soluble concentrate) containing paraquat dichloride at or above 276 g/L, corresponding to paraquat ion at or above 200 g/L
Acetochlor
Iprodione

State parties

File:Map of Rotterdam Convention.svg

As of October 2018, the convention has 161 parties, which includes 158 UN member states, the Cook Islands, the State of Palestine, and the European Union. Non-member states include the United States.

Discussion about chrysotile asbestos

At the 2011 meeting of the Rotterdam Convention in Geneva, the Canadian delegation surprised many with a refusal to allow the addition of chrysotile asbestos fibers to the Rotterdam Convention.[http://www.ncic.cancer.ca/Canada-wide/About%20us/Media%20centre/CW-Media%20releases/CW-2011/Rotterdam%20Convention%20vote.aspx?sc_lang=en Canadian Cancer Society Reacts to Conservative Harper Administration's Position on Chrysotile] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110827183535/http://www.ncic.cancer.ca/Canada-wide/About%20us/Media%20centre/CW-Media%20releases/CW-2011/Rotterdam%20Convention%20vote.aspx?sc_lang=en |date=27 August 2011 }}, 23 June 2011[https://vancouversun.com/story_print.html?id=4970331&sponsor= Canadian comedienne fails to see humor in Canadian position on treaty]{{Dead link|date=February 2022 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}[https://vancouversun.com/health/Conference+slams+Canada+stance+asbestos/5003320/story.html UN Delegates Shocked at Canadian Stand on Chrysotile]{{Dead link|date=February 2022 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}, 24 June 2011[http://www.asbestosdiseaseawareness.org/wp-content/uploads/Letter-to-Prime-Minister-Harper-Rotterdam-June-14-2011.pdf Canadian Physicians criticize own government] Hearings are scheduled in the EU in the near future to evaluate the position of Canada and decide on the possibility of a punitive course of action.{{cite web|url=http://www.canada.com/business/European+Parliament+slams+Canada+oilsands+asbestos+sealing+industries/4914343/story.html |title=European Parliament slams Canada's oilsands, asbestos, sealing industries | first=Peter |last=O'Neil |publisher=Canada.com |date=2011-06-08 |access-date=10 August 2011 }}{{cite web |url=http://www.europarl.europa.eu/en/pressroom/content/20110608IPR20931/html/MEPs-favour-EU-Canada-trade-deal-but-worry-about-seals-oil-and-asbestos |title=MEPs favour EU-Canada trade deal, but worry about seals, tar sand oil and asbestos |work=Europa (web portal) |access-date=2011-08-10 |archive-date=27 July 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110727213420/http://www.europarl.europa.eu/en/pressroom/content/20110608IPR20931/html/MEPs-favour-EU-Canada-trade-deal-but-worry-about-seals-oil-and-asbestos |url-status=dead }}{{cite web |url=http://www.canadians.org/campaignblog/?p=8438 |archive-url=https://wayback.archive-it.org/all/20110803220933/http://www.canadians.org/campaignblog/?p=8438 |url-status=dead |archive-date=2011-08-03 |title=UPDATE: European Parliament to be asked to take sanctions against Canada on asbestos, June 30 |publisher=Council of Canadians |date=2011-06-29 |access-date=10 August 2011 }}

In continuing its objection, Canada is the only G8 country objecting to the listing. Kyrgyzstan, Kazakhstan and Ukraine also objected. Vietnam had also raised an objection, but missed a follow-up meeting on the issue.[https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/canada-wins-battle-to-keep-asbestos-off-hazardous-list-1.1124476 Canada Wins 2-year Stay on Potential Ban of Exports of Chrysotile Asbestos to India] In taking its position, the Canadian Government contrasted with India, which withdrew its long-standing objection to the addition of chrysotile to the list just prior to the 2011 conference. (India later reversed this position in 2013.){{Cite web| title = India's contentious stand on Chrysotile asbestos is a cause for concern for environmentalists| work = Hindustan Times| access-date = 2018-08-21| date = 2017-05-03| url = https://www.hindustantimes.com/health/india-s-contentious-stand-on-chrysotile-asbestos-is-a-cause-for-concern-for-environmentalists/story-k6iM84vsZ00mhlV0Brn1ML.html}}

Numerous non-governmental organizations have publicly expressed criticism of Canada's decision to block this addition.{{Cite web |url=http://www.wecf.eu/english/press/releases/2011/06/rotterdam-convention.php |title=Women In Europe for a Concerned Future criticize Canada's stance in 2011 |access-date=10 July 2011 |archive-date=31 March 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160331210943/http://www.wecf.eu/english/press/releases/2011/06/rotterdam-convention.php |url-status=dead }}{{Cite web |url=http://www.thetruthaboutdow.org/article.php?id=1428 |title=2011 Rotterdam Convention Decision criticized by environmental groups |access-date=10 July 2011 |archive-date=23 March 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120323130503/http://www.thetruthaboutdow.org/article.php?id=1428 |url-status=dead }}{{Cite web |url=http://www.thetruthaboutdow.org/article.php?id=1428 |title=Canadian Cancer Society denounces decision by Canadian Government |access-date=10 July 2011 |archive-date=23 March 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120323130503/http://www.thetruthaboutdow.org/article.php?id=1428 |url-status=dead }}[http://ibasecretariat.org/lka_canada_how_could_you.php International Ban Asbestos Secretariat issues statement critical of Canadian decision]{{Cite web |url=http://www.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/category/thesaurus/mining/minerals/asbestos |title=Indian Center for Science and Environment issues statement criticizing Canada |access-date=10 July 2011 |archive-date=22 May 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110522114917/http://indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/category/thesaurus/mining/minerals/asbestos |url-status=dead }}

In September 2012, Canadian Industry minister Christian Paradis announced the Canadian government would no longer oppose inclusion of chrysotile in the convention.{{cite web

| title = Canada won't oppose asbestos limits

| work = CBC News

| publisher = CBC/Radio-Canada

| date = 14 September 2012

| url = https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/canada-won-t-oppose-asbestos-limits-1.1254033

| access-date = 14 September 2012}}

Eight of the largest chrysotile producing and exporting countries opposed such a move at the Rotterdam Conference of Parties in 2015: Russia, Kazakhstan, India, Kyrgyzstan, Pakistan, Cuba, and Zimbabwe.

References

External links

[http://www.pic.int/ Official site of The Rotterdam Convention]
[https://web.archive.org/web/20101225190853/http://www.pic.int/en/ConventionText/ONU-GB.pdf Text of theConvention]
[http://treaties.un.org/pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=XXVII-14&chapter=27&lang=en Ratifications] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110827113957/http://treaties.un.org/Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=XXVII-14&chapter=27&lang=en |date=27 August 2011 }}
[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5UFMB2FdvRs The Rotterdam Convention Prior Informed Consent Procedure]

Category:Chemical safety

Category:Treaties concluded in 1998

Category:Treaties entered into force in 2004

Category:United Nations treaties

Category:Treaties of Afghanistan

Category:Treaties of Albania

Category:Treaties of Antigua and Barbuda

Category:Treaties of Argentina

Category:Treaties of Armenia

Category:Treaties of Australia

Category:Treaties of Austria

Category:Treaties of Bahrain