:Talk:Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railroad

Does anyone know exactly where the Lackawanna's headquarters were at? I've got a source ([http://lackawanna.railfan.net/scrantn1.htm Lackwanna Station, Scranton]) that says it was in Scranton, but a Lackwanna passenger timetable I've seen seemed to suggest that the railroad was headquartered in New York City.--Foxhound 19:58, 12 January 2006 (UTC)

:The division headquarters were in Scranton. But the president's office was in Hoboken. The business office was in NYC.WallyFromColumbia (talk) 23:53, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

::Correct. Corporate headquarters were located in Manhattan.Oanabay04 (talk) 20:57, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

I feel this article, like most other articles about fallen flags, is of mid importance. I have ranked it as such. 3D jonny 00:33, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

This is a note to editors to say that I have revised this article today, with some significant deletions in the post-1960 merger section. The reason for this is because — for all intents and purposes — anything relating to the Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railroad ends in 1960. Details pertainin to Phoebe Snow, Lackawanna Cut-Off, etc, belong in those corresponding articles and have been marked as such. Anything concerning the years after the EL merger belong in that corresponding article. This includes status of current lines, structure, etc.Oanabay04 (talk) 20:56, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: {{cite book | last = Drury | first = George H. | authorlink = | coauthors = | title = The Historical Guide to North American Railroads: Histories, Figures, and Features of more than 160 Railroads Abandoned or Merged since 1930 | publisher = Kalmbach Publishing | year = 1994 | location = Waukesha, Wisconsin | pages = 108–110 | doi = | id = | isbn = 0-89024-072-8}}. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Mackensen (talk) 16:05, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

: Mackensen, Would you please specify what exactly the concern is with relation to copyright? I fully agree that any duplication of text needs to be removed but simply wiping out the contributions of other editors is not appropriate. The images on the page prior to your page-wide edit were all open source, relevant to the historical periods on the page and did not need to be removed.Monopoly31121993 (talk) 14:09, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

:: I've reverted you. {{user|Oanabay04}} inserted massive amounts of material lifted directly from Drury, as mentioned above. Reverting to the last known clean version was the only reasonable way to resolve the issue. You're of course free to restore images and non-copyvio text. If you'd like to assist with the effort to review and cleanup Oanabay04's edits, please see Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Oanabay04. Mackensen (talk) 16:37, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

:: To be clear, it's this series of edits in November 2012 (see his note above, after he made them): [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Delaware%2C_Lackawanna_and_Western_Railroad&type=revision&diff=521590632&oldid=521010986]. This is word-for-word from Drury. Mackensen (talk) 16:51, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

:::Ok, a major pain to clean this but I see now why it was necessary. ThanksMonopoly31121993 (talk) 10:07, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified {{plural:3|one external link|3 external links}} on Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railroad. Please take a moment to review [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=730094379 my edit]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110713024447/http://www.zwire.com:80/site/news.cfm?newsid=10845647&BRD=2259&PAG=461&dept_id=460522&rfi=8 to http://www.zwire.com/site/news.cfm?newsid=10845647&BRD=2259&PAG=461&dept_id=460522&rfi=8
• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20060930032929/http://www.prrths.com/PRR_hagley_intro.htm to http://www.prrths.com/PRR_hagley_intro.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151104155926/http://www.earlpleasants.com/search_1.asp to http://www.earlpleasants.com/search_1.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{tlx|Sourcecheck}}).

{{sourcecheck|checked=false}}

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:19, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railroad. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040811165617/http://www.erielackhs.org/Lackawanna/LACKHOME.html to http://www.erielackhs.org/Lackawanna/LACKHOME.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20030126060319/http://gelwood.railfan.net/el/bldg/dlw-cutoff.html to http://gelwood.railfan.net/el/bldg/dlw-cutoff.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}}

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:18, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

Thus, all hyphens between “E” and “L” in “EL” as an abbreviation should be restored, not reinstated. 174.212.161.0 (talk) 15:51, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

First, please forgive my vast ignorance and incompetence.

When I search the edit history for the page, I find no creation date or information for the current OSM map.

The map itself has no log entries at all ( https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Log?type=&user=&page=Data%3ADelaware%2C+Lackawanna+and+Western+Railroad.map&wpdate=&tagfilter=&wpfilters%5B%5D=thanks&wpfilters%5B%5D=patrol&wpfilters%5B%5D=tag&wpfilters%5B%5D=newusers ).

Furthermore, the External Maps only link to a single coordinate point, not the full routes ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delaware,_Lackawanna_and_Western_Railroad#/map/0 ).

I presume the map is implemented using the Kartographer extension ( https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Help:Extension:Kartographer ).

In any case, the source shows the route lines on a map as a massive set of coordinates.

Given that there is a method for using map objects ( https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Help:Extension:Kartographer/OSM ); I'd prefer to do so as this appears to allow much more information to be preserved and shared in the page. It might also expose the map object history, which has it's own merits.

Again, please forgive my vast ignorance and incompetence.

Does anyone have any insight here? Is there a better place to post this.

Thanks in advance for your time and patience.

-scopulorum

Scopulorum (talk) 16:07, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

Scopulorum (talk) 16:09, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

Scopulorum (talk) 16:18, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

I added a couple of sentences with references cited the way I usually do; the way they usually work. But they aren't working on this article and I have no idea why.

Can someone please fix my reference code mess and let me know what I did wrong?

TIA

Kether83 (talk) 03:09, 8 January 2025 (UTC)