:en:1860 United States presidential election

The 1860 presidential election conventions were unusually tumultuous, particularly because a split in the Democratic Party had led to both Northern and Southern party conventions.

{{Main|1860 Republican National Convention}}

{{Sidebar person/US President

| template=Abraham Lincoln series

| president=Abraham Lincoln

| portrait=Abraham Lincoln O-77 matte collodion print (3x4 close cropped).jpg

| signature=Abraham Lincoln 1862 signature.svg

| contents=

----

{{hidden begin|contentstyle=text-align:center;|title=Personal|expanded=y{{#ifeq:{{{expanded|}}}|Personal|y|}}}}

• Early life and career
• Family
• Health
• Religious views
• Sexuality
• Patent
• Artifacts and relics
• Photographs
• Black Hawk War

{{hidden end}}

----

{{hidden begin|contentstyle=text-align:center;|title=Political|expanded=y{{#ifeq:{{{expanded|}}}|Political|y|}}}}

• Spot Resolutions
• Political career, 1849–1861
• Douglas debates
• Views on slavery

{{hidden end}}

----

{{hidden begin|contentstyle=text-align:center;|title=16th President of the United States|expanded=y{{#ifeq:{{{expanded|}}}|16th president of the United States|y|}}}}

• Presidency
• Transition
• Inaugurations
• first
• second

{{hidden end}}

----

{{hidden begin|contentstyle=text-align:center;|title=Tenure|expanded=y{{#ifeq:{{{expanded|}}}|Tenure|y|}}}}

• American Civil War
• The Union
• Emancipation Proclamation
• Ten percent plan
• 13th Amendment
• Reconstruction

{{hidden end}}

----

{{hidden begin|contentstyle=text-align:center;|title=Presidential campaigns|expanded=y{{#ifeq:{{{expanded|}}}|Presidential campaigns|y|}}}}

• 1860
• election
• convention
• 1864
• election
• convention

{{hidden end}}

----

{{hidden begin|contentstyle=text-align:center;|title=Speeches and works|expanded=y{{#ifeq:{{{expanded|}}}|Speeches and works|y|}}}}

• Inaugural speeches
• first
• second
• State of the Union
• 1861
• 1862
• 1863
• 1864
• Lyceum
• Peoria
• Lost Speech
• House Divided
• Cooper Union
• Farewell address
• Gettysburg

• Poetry
• "The Suicide's Soliloquy"
• Bixby letter
• McCullough letter

{{hidden end}}

----

{{hidden begin|contentstyle=text-align:center;|title=Assassination|expanded=y{{#ifeq:{{{expanded|}}}|Assassination|y|}}}}

• Baltimore Plot
• State funeral
• Tomb
• Catafalque
• Flags
• Hearse
• Lincoln–Kennedy coincidences

{{hidden end}}

----

{{hidden begin|contentstyle=text-align:center;|title=Legacy|expanded=y{{#ifeq:{{{expanded|}}}|Legacy|y|}}}}

• Historical reputation
• Memorials
• Depictions
• Lincoln's Birthday
• Ghost

• Bibliography

• Topical guide

{{hidden end}}

}}

Republican candidates:

• Abraham Lincoln, former representative from Illinois
• William Seward, senator from New York
• Simon Cameron, senator from Pennsylvania
• Salmon P. Chase, governor of Ohio
• Edward Bates, former representative from Missouri
• John McLean, associate justice of the U.S. Supreme Court
• Benjamin Wade, senator from Ohio
• William L. Dayton, former senator from New Jersey

File:Abraham Lincoln O-26 by Hesler, 1860 (cropped).jpg|Former Representative Abraham Lincoln
from Illinois

File:William Henry Seward - edited.jpg|Senator William H. Seward from New York

File:Smn Cameron-SecofWar.jpg|Senator Simon Cameron
from Pennsylvania

File:Samuel Portland Chase.jpg|Governor Salmon P. Chase
of Ohio

File:Edward Bates - Brady-Handy (cropped).jpg|Former Representative Edward Bates from Missouri

File:John McLean - History of Ohio.jpg|Associate Justice John McLean

File:Benjamin F Wade - Brady-Handy.jpg|Senator Benjamin Wade from Ohio

File:William L. Dayton.jpg|Former Senator William L. Dayton from New Jersey

File:Chicago Wigwam.png, site of the Republican Convention]]

The Republican National Convention met in mid-May 1860 after the Democrats had been forced to adjourn their convention in Charleston. With the Democrats in disarray and a sweep of the Northern states possible, the Republicans felt confident going into their convention in Chicago. William H. Seward from New York was considered the front-runner, followed by Salmon P. Chase from Ohio, and Missouri's Edward Bates. Abraham Lincoln from Illinois was less well-known and was not considered to have a good chance against Seward. Seward had been governor and senator of New York and was an able politician with a Whig background. Also running were John C. Frémont, William L. Dayton, Cassius M. Clay, and Benjamin Wade, who might be able to win if the convention deadlocked.{{Cite book| last=Donald|first=David Herbert| url=https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/32589068| title=Lincoln| publisher=Simon & Schuster| year=1995| isbn=0-684-80846-3|location=New York|pages=230–256| oclc=32589068}}

As the convention developed, however, it was revealed that frontrunners Seward, Chase, and Bates had each alienated factions of the Republican Party. Seward had been painted as a radical, and his speeches on slavery predicted inevitable conflict, which spooked moderate delegates. He also was firmly opposed to nativism, which further weakened his position. He had also been abandoned by his longtime friend and political ally Horace Greeley, publisher of the influential New-York Tribune.

Chase, a former Democrat, had alienated many of the former Whigs by his coalition with the Democrats in the late 1840s. He had also opposed tariffs demanded by Pennsylvania and even had opposition from his own delegation from Ohio.{{Citation needed|date=December 2020}} However, Chase's firm anti-slavery stance made him popular with the Radical Republicans. But what he offered in policy he lacked in charisma and political acumen.

The conservative Bates was an unlikely candidate but found support from Horace Greeley, who sought any chance to defeat Seward, with whom he now had a bitter feud. Bates outlined his positions on the extension of slavery into the territories and equal constitutional rights for all citizens, positions that alienated his supporters in the border states and Southern conservatives, while German Americans in the party opposed Bates because of his past association with the Know Nothings.

Into this mix came Lincoln. He was not unknown; he had gained prominence in the 1858 Lincoln–Douglas debates and had represented Illinois in the House of Representatives. Lincoln had been quietly eyeing a run since the debates, ensuring that they were widely published and that a biography of himself was published. He gained great notability with his acclaimed February 1860 Cooper Union speech, which may have ensured him the nomination although he had not yet announced his intention to run. Delivered in Seward's home state and attended by Greeley, Lincoln used the speech to show that the Republican Party was a party of moderates, not crazed fanatics, as Southerners and Democrats claimed. Afterward, Lincoln was in much demand for speaking engagements.{{Cite book| last=Holzer| first=Harold| url=https://archive.org/details/lincolnatcooperu00haro_0/page/1|title=Lincoln at Cooper Union: The Speech That Made Abraham Lincoln President| date=November 7, 2006|isbn=0-7432-9964-7|page=[https://archive.org/details/lincolnatcooperu00haro_0/page/1 1]| publisher=Simon & Schuster|quote=[H]ad he not triumphed before the sophisticated and demanding audience he faced at New York's Cooper Union on February 27, 1860, Lincoln would likely never have been nominated, much less elected, to the presidency that November.|access-date=March 12, 2016}} As the convention approached, Lincoln did not campaign actively, as the "office was expected to seek the man". So it did at the Illinois state convention, a week before the national convention. Young politician Richard Oglesby found several fence rails that Lincoln may have split as a youngster and paraded them into the convention with a banner that proclaimed Lincoln to be "The Rail Candidate" for president. Lincoln received a thunderous ovation, surpassing his and his political allies' expectations. Lincoln's campaign managers had printed and distributed thousands of fake convention admission tickets to Lincoln supporters to ensure and increase the crowd's support.{{Cite book|last=Lepore|first=Jill|title=These Truths: A History of the United States|publisher=W. W. Norton & Company|year=2018|isbn=978-0-393-63524-9|location=New York|pages=287|language=English}}

Even with such support from his home state, Lincoln faced a difficult task if he was to win the nomination. He set about ensuring that he was the second choice of most delegates, realizing that the first round of voting at the convention was unlikely to produce a clear winner. He engineered that the convention would happen in Chicago, which would be inherently friendly to the Illinois-based Lincoln. He also made sure that the Illinois delegation would vote as a bloc for him. Lincoln did not attend the convention in person and left the task of delegate wrangling to several close friends.

The first round of voting predictably produced a lead for Seward, but not a majority, with Lincoln in second place. The second round eliminated most of the minor contenders, with voters switching mostly to Seward or Lincoln. The convention remained deadlocked, however, and skillful political maneuvering by Lincoln's delegate wranglers convinced some delegates to abandon Seward in favor of Lincoln. Lincoln's combination of a moderate stance on slavery, long support for economic issues, his western origins, and strong oratory proved to be exactly what the delegates wanted in a president. On the third ballot on May 18, Lincoln secured the presidential nomination overwhelmingly.{{Cite web|title=Proceedings of the Republican national convention held at Chicago, May 16, 17 and 18, 1860 by Republican National Convention (2nd : 1860 : Chicago, Ill.): Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming: Internet Archive| url=https://archive.org/details/proceedingsofrep00repuiala|access-date=2020-12-28|website=Internet Archive| year=1860|language=en}} Senator Hannibal Hamlin from Maine was nominated for vice president, defeating Clay. Hamlin was surprised by his nomination, saying he was "astonished" and that he "neither expected nor desired it."{{cite book |last1=Foner |title=The Fiery Trial |date=September 26, 2011 |publisher=W.W. Norton & Company |isbn=978-0-393-34066-2 |pages=140}}

The party platform{{cite web |url=http://cprr.org/Museum/Ephemera/Republican_Platform_1860.html |title=Republican National Platform, 1860 |date=2003-04-13 |website=Central Pacific Railroad Photographic History Museum |publisher=CPRR.org |access-date=2015-04-17}} promised not to interfere with slavery in the states, but opposed slavery in the territories. The platform promised tariffs protecting industry and workers, a Homestead Act granting free farmland in the West to settlers, and the funding of a transcontinental railroad. There was no mention of Mormonism (which had been condemned in the Party's 1856 platform), the Fugitive Slave Act, personal liberty laws, or the Dred Scott decision.Rhodes (1920) 2:420 While the Seward forces were disappointed at the nomination of a little-known western upstart, they rallied behind Lincoln, while abolitionists were angry at the selection of a moderate and had little faith in Lincoln.Rhodes (1920) 2:429{{cite book |last=Baum |first=Dale |date=1984 |title=The Civil War Party System: The Case of Massachusetts, 1848–1876 |url=https://archive.org/details/civilwarpartysys0000baum|url-access=registration |location=Chapel Hill |publisher=The University of North Carolina Press |page=[https://archive.org/details/civilwarpartysys0000baum/page/49 49] |isbn=0-8078-1588-8 |access-date= }}

{{anchor|National (Northern) Democratic}}

{{More citations needed|section|date=November 2023}}

{{Main|1860 Democratic National Conventions}}

File:James Buchanan (cropped).jpg, the incumbent president in 1860, whose term expired on March 4, 1861]]

Northern Democratic candidates:

• Stephen Douglas, senator from Illinois
• James Guthrie, former treasury secretary from Kentucky
• Robert Mercer Taliaferro Hunter, senator from Virginia
• Joseph Lane, senator from Oregon
• Daniel S. Dickinson, former senator from New York
• Andrew Johnson, senator from Tennessee
• Howell Cobb, treasury secretary from Georgia

File:Senator Stephen A. Douglas (edited) cropped.png|Senator Stephen A. Douglas from Illinois

File:JamesGuthrie.png|Former Treasury Secretary James Guthrie from Kentucky

File:RobertMercerTaliaferroHunter.png|Senator Robert M. T. Hunter from Virginia

File:JosephLane.png|Senator Joseph Lane from Oregon

File:DanielSDickinson.png|Former Senator Daniel S. Dickinson from New York

File:Andrew Johnson, seated, facing left 1860.jpg|Senator Andrew Johnson
from Tennessee

File:Howell Cobb-crop.jpg|Treasury Secretary Howell Cobb from Georgia

File:St Andrew's Hall, Charleston.jpg. The Institute hosted the Democratic National Convention and December Secession Convention in 1860.]]

At the Democratic National Convention held in Institute Hall in Charleston, South Carolina, in April 1860, 50 Southern Democrats walked out over a platform dispute, led by the extreme pro-slavery "Fire-Eater" William Lowndes Yancey and the Alabama delegation: following them were the entire delegations of Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina and Texas, three of the four delegates from Arkansas, and one of the three delegates from Delaware.

Image:1860NorthernDemocraticPartyPoster.png

Six candidates were running: Stephen A. Douglas from Illinois, James Guthrie from Kentucky, Robert Mercer Taliaferro Hunter from Virginia, Joseph Lane from Oregon, Daniel S. Dickinson from New York, and Andrew Johnson from Tennessee, while three other candidates, Isaac Toucey from Connecticut, James Pearce from Maryland, and Jefferson Davis from Mississippi (the future president of the Confederate States) also received votes.

Douglas, a moderate on the slavery issue who favored "popular sovereignty", was ahead on the first ballot, but was 56½ votes short of securing the nomination. On the 57th ballot, with Douglas still ahead, but 51½ votes short of the nomination, the exhausted and desperate delegates agreed on May 3 to cease voting and adjourn the convention.

While the Democrats convened again at the Front Street Theater in Baltimore, Maryland, on June 18, 110 Southern delegates (led by "Fire-Eaters") boycotted the convention or walked out after the convention informed them they would not adopt a resolution supporting extending slavery into territories whose voters did not want it.

While some considered Horatio Seymour a compromise candidate for the national Democratic nomination at the reconvening convention in Baltimore, Seymour wrote a letter to the editor of his local newspaper declaring unreservedly that he was not a candidate for either spot on the ticket. After two ballots - the 59th ballot overall - the remaining Democrats nominated Stephen A. Douglas from Illinois for president.{{Cite book|last=Morris|first=Roy Jr.|title=The Long Pursuit: Abraham Lincoln's Thirty-Year Struggle with Stephen Douglas for the Heart and Soul of America.|publisher=HarperCollins|year=2008|isbn=978-0060852092|pages=150–152}} The election would now pit Lincoln against his longtime political rival, whom Lincoln had lost to in the Illinois senate race just two years earlier. That two candidates were from Illinois showed the importance of the West in the election.

While Benjamin Fitzpatrick from Alabama was nominated for vice president, he refused the nomination.

After the convention concluded with no vice presidential nominee, Douglas offered the vice presidential nomination to Herschel V. Johnson from Georgia, who accepted.

{{anchor|Constitutional (Southern) Democratic}}

{{Main|1860 Democratic National Conventions}}

Southern Democratic candidates:

• John C. Breckinridge, Vice President of the United States
• Daniel S. Dickinson, former senator from New York
• Robert Mercer Taliaferro Hunter, senator from Virginia
• Joseph Lane, senator from Oregon
• Jefferson Davis, senator from Mississippi{{efn|name=Davis}}

File:John C Breckinridge-04775-restored.jpg|Vice President John C. Breckinridge

File:DanielSDickinson.png|Former Senator
Daniel S. Dickinson from New York

File:RobertMercerTaliaferroHunter.png|Senator
Robert M. T. Hunter from Virginia
(declined to be nominated)

File:JosephLane.png|Senator Joseph Lane from Oregon
(declined to be nominated)

File:President-Jefferson-Davis (3x4 cropped).jpg|Senator Jefferson Davis from Mississippi
(declined to be nominated){{efn|name=Davis|Davis would later be elected for a one-year provisional term as the President of the Confederate States of America on February 18, 1861. On February 22, 1862, Davis was elected permanent occupant of the position, which he held until the dissolution of the CSA on May 5, 1865}}

File:MDINST.jpg, The Road to Disunion: Secessionists Triumphant, Vol.2. Oxford University, 2007, p. 321]]

The delegates who walked out of the convention at Charleston reconvened in Richmond, Virginia on June 11. When the Democrats reconvened in Baltimore, they rejoined (except South Carolina and Florida, who had stayed in Richmond).

When the convention seated two replacement delegations on June 18, they walked out again or boycotted the convention, accompanied by nearly all other Southern delegates and erstwhile Convention chair Caleb Cushing, a New Englander and former member of Franklin Pierce's cabinet.

This larger group met immediately in Baltimore's Institute Hall, with Cushing again presiding. They adopted the pro-slavery platform rejected at Charleston, and nominated Vice President John C. Breckinridge for president, and Senator Joseph Lane from Oregon for vice president.Heidler, p. 157. Baltimore's Institute Hall, not be confused with Charleston's Institute Hall also used by the walk-out delegations.

Yancey and some (less than half) of the bolters - almost entirely from the Lower South - met on June 28 in Richmond, along with the South Carolina and Florida delegations, at a convention that affirmed the nominations of Breckinridge and Lane.

Besides the Democratic parties in the Southern states, the Breckinridge/Lane ticket was also supported by the Buchanan administration. Buchanan's own continued prestige in his home state of Pennsylvania ensured that Breckinridge would be the principal Democratic candidate in that populous state. Breckinridge was the last sitting vice president nominated for president until Richard Nixon in 1960.

{{Main|1860 Constitutional Union Convention}}

Constitutional Union candidates:

• John Bell, former senator from Tennessee
• Sam Houston, governor of Texas
• John J. Crittenden, senator from Kentucky
• Edward Everett, former senator from Massachusetts
• William A. Graham, former senator from North Carolina
• William C. Rives, former senator from Virginia

File:John Bell (Restored).png|Former Senator John Bell of Tennessee

File:SHouston 2.jpg|Governor Sam Houston of Texas

File:John Jordan Crittenden - Brady 1855.jpg|Senator John J. Crittenden from Kentucky

File:Edward Everett.jpg|Former Senator Edward Everett from Massachusetts

File:William Alexander Graham - Brady-Handy.jpg|Former Senator William A. Graham from North Carolina

File:WilliamCRives.png|Former Senator William C. Rives from Virginia

File:Bell Everett Campaign Poster 1860.jpg

The Constitutional Union Party was formed by remnants of both the defunct Know Nothing and Whig Parties who were unwilling to join either the Republicans or the Democrats. The new party's members hoped to stave off Southern secession by avoiding the slavery issue.{{cite web |author-link=Susan Schulten |last=Schulten |first=Susan |date=November 10, 2010 |title=How (And Where) Lincoln Won |work=The New York Times |url=http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/11/10/how-and-where-lincoln-won/ |url-access=subscription}} They met in the Eastside District Courthouse of Baltimore and nominated John Bell from Tennessee for president over Governor Sam Houston of Texas on the second ballot. Edward Everett was nominated for vice president at the convention on May 9, 1860, one week before Lincoln.{{cite book|last=Lossing|first=Benson John|url=https://archive.org/details/pictorialhistor00lossgoog|page=[https://archive.org/details/pictorialhistor00lossgoog/page/n35 29]|title=Pictorial history of the civil war in the United States of America, Volume 1|publisher=G.W. Childs|year=1866|location=Poughkeepsie, NY|author-link=Benson John Lossing|access-date=January 26, 2012}}. Bolters met at St. Andrew's Hall.The building had been the First Presbyterian Meeting House (Two Towers Church) on Fayette Street, between Calvert and North Street, demolished before 1866 and occupied by the United States Courthouse.

John Bell was a former Whig who had opposed the Kansas–Nebraska Act and the Lecompton Constitution. Edward Everett had been president of Harvard University and Secretary of State in the Millard Fillmore administration. The party platform advocated compromise to save the Union with the slogan "The Union as it is, and the Constitution as it is."[http://dig.lib.niu.edu/message/candidates-douglas.html Getting the Message Out! Stephen A. Douglas] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150120053702/http://dig.lib.niu.edu/message/candidates-douglas.html |date=January 20, 2015 }}

Liberty (Union) candidates:

• Gerrit Smith, former representative from New York

File:GerritSmith-1840s.jpg|Former Representative Gerrit Smith from New York

By 1860, very little remained of the Liberty Party, after most of its membership left to join the Free Soil Party in 1848 and nearly all of what remained of it joined the Republicans in 1854. The remaining party was also called the Radical Abolitionists.{{citation | title = Proceedings of the Convention of Radical Political Abolitionists, held at Syracuse, N. Y., June 26th, 27th, and 28th, 1855 | location = New York | publisher = Central Abolition Board | date = 1855 | url = http://www.wvculture.org/history/jbexhibit/radical.html | access-date = March 5, 2018 | archive-date = September 5, 2018 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20180905023328/http://www.wvculture.org/history/jbexhibit/radical.html | url-status = dead }}{{cite news | url = https://transcription.si.edu/transcribe/12251/ACM-2007.19.5_16 | title = RADICAL ABOLITION NATIONAL CONVENTION | work = Douglass' Monthly | date = October 1860 | page = 352}} A convention of one hundred delegates was held in Convention Hall, Syracuse, New York, on August 29, 1860. Delegates were in attendance from New York, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Michigan, Illinois, Ohio, Kentucky, and Massachusetts. Several of the delegates were women.

Gerrit Smith, a prominent abolitionist and the 1848 presidential nominee of the original Liberty Party, had sent a letter in which he stated that his health had been so poor that he had not been able to be away from home since 1858. Nonetheless, he remained popular in the party because he had helped inspire some of John Brown's supporters at the Raid on Harpers Ferry. In his letter, Smith donated $50 to pay for the printing of ballots in the various states.

There was quite a spirited contest between the friends of Gerrit Smith and William Goodell in regard to the nomination for the presidency. In spite of his professed ill health, Gerrit Smith was nominated for president and Samuel McFarland from Pennsylvania was nominated for vice president.

In Ohio, Illinois, and Indiana, slates of presidential electors pledged to Smith and McFarland ran with the name of the Union Party. They received a total of 176 votes in the general election, 0.004% of the total.{{sfn|Dubin|2002|p=159}}

File:SHouston 2.jpg|Governor Sam Houston of Texas

The People's Party was a loose association of the supporters of Governor Samuel Houston. On April 20, 1860, the party held what it termed a national convention to nominate Houston for president on the San Jacinto Battlefield in Texas. Houston's supporters at the gathering did not nominate a vice presidential candidate, since they expected later gatherings to carry out that function. Later mass meetings were held in northern cities, such as New York City on May 30, 1860, but they too failed to nominate a vice presidential candidate. Houston, never enthusiastic about running for the presidency, soon became convinced that he had no chance of winning and that his candidacy would only make it easier for the Republican candidate to win. He withdrew from the race on August 16, and urged the formation of a Unified "Union" ticket in opposition to Lincoln.{{cite news |url=https://www.nytimes.com/1860/05/30/news/political-movements-houston-mass-meeting-large-gathering-people-union-square.html |work=The New York Times |title=POLITICAL MOVEMENTS.; THE HOUSTON MASS MEETING. Large Gathering of the People in Union-Square--Washington statue Illuminated. The Hero of San Jacinto Nominated for the Presidency. Speeches, Address, Resolutions, Music, Fireworks, Guns, and Fun |date=May 30, 1860}}{{cite news |url=https://www.nytimes.com/1860/09/03/news/letter-from-sam-houston-withdrawing-from-the-canvass.html |work=The New York Times |title=Letter from Sam Houston Withdrawing from the Canvass |date=September 3, 1860}}

{{Events leading to US Civil War}}

In their campaigning, Bell and Douglas both claimed that disunion would not necessarily follow a Lincoln election. Nonetheless, loyal army officers in Virginia, Kansas and South Carolina warned Lincoln of military preparations to the contrary. Secessionists threw their support behind Breckinridge in an attempt either to force the anti-Republican candidates to coordinate their electoral votes or throw the election into the House of Representatives, where the selection of the president would be made by the representatives elected in 1858, before the Republican majorities in both House and Senate achieved in 1860 were seated in the new 37th Congress. Mexican War hero Winfield Scott suggested to Lincoln that he assume the powers of a commander-in-chief before inauguration. However, historian Bruce Chadwick observes that Lincoln and his advisors ignored the widespread alarms and threats of secession as mere election trickery.{{cite book|title=Lincoln for President: An Unlikely Candidate, An Audacious Strategy, and the Victory No One Saw Coming|date=November 1, 2010|first1=Bruce|last1=Chadwick|publisher=Sourcebooks|isbn=978-1402244834 }}

Indeed, voting in the South was not as monolithic as the Electoral College map would make it seem. Economically, culturally, and politically, the South was made up of three regions. In the states of the Upper South, also known as the Border South (Delaware, Maryland, Kentucky, and Missouri), unionist popular votes were scattered among Lincoln, Douglas, and Bell, to form a majority in all four. In the four Middle South states, there was a unionist majority divided between Douglas and Bell in Virginia and Tennessee; in North Carolina and Arkansas, the unionist (Bell and Douglas) vote approached a majority. In three of the seven Deep South states, unionists (Bell and Douglas) won divided majorities in Georgia and Louisiana and neared it in Alabama. Breckinridge convincingly carried only four of the seven states of the Deep South (South Carolina, Florida, Mississippi, and Texas).{{cite journal |last1=Hindley |first1=Meredith |title=The Man Who Came in Second |journal=Humanities |date=November–December 2010 |volume=31 |issue=6 |url=https://www.neh.gov/humanities/2011/novemberdecember/feature/the-man-who-came-in-second |access-date=13 March 2020}} The Deep South states had the largest enslaved populations, and consequently the smallest enfranchised free white populations.Freehling, William W., The Road to Disunion: Volume II. Secessionists Triumphant, 1854–1861, Oxford University Press, 2004, p. 447.

Among the slave states, the three states with the highest voter turnouts voted the most one-sided. Texas, with five percent of the total wartime South's population, voted 75 percent Breckinridge. Kentucky and Missouri, with one-fourth the total population, voted 73 percent pro-Union Bell, Douglas and Lincoln. In comparison, the other six states of the Deep South made up one-fourth the Confederate voting population, split 57 percent Breckinridge versus 43 percent for the two pro-union candidates.{{efn|"Deep South" here in presidential popular votes refers to Georgia, Florida, Alabama, Mississippi and Louisiana. It excludes South Carolina from the calculation, because in 1860 it chose presidential electors in the state legislature, without a popular vote.}} The four states that were admitted to the Confederacy after Fort Sumter held almost half its population, and voted a narrow combined majority of 53 percent for the pro-union candidates.

In the eleven states that would later declare their secession from the Union and be controlled by Confederate armies, ballots for Lincoln were cast only in Virginia,{{efn|Ballots were printed sheets, usually printed by the party, with the name of the candidate(s) and the names of presidential electors who were pledged to that presidential candidate. Voters brought the ballot to the polling station and dropped it publicly into the election box. In order to receive any votes, a candidate (or his party) had to have ballots printed and organize a group of electors pledged to that candidate. Except in some border areas, the Republican party did not attempt any organization in the South and did not print ballots there because almost no one was willing to acknowledge publicly they were voting for Lincoln for fear of violent retribution.{{cite web|url=http://www.virginiamemory.com/online_classroom/union_or_secession/doc/republican_ballot|title=Republican ballot 1860|access-date=2011-04-28}}{{cite web|url=http://housedivided.dickinson.edu/sites/blogdivided/2010/07/19/election-of-1860-read-your-ballot|title=Election of 1860 – 'Read Your Ballot'|access-date=2011-04-28}}}}

where he received 1,929 votes (1.15 percent of the total). Unsurprisingly, the vast majority of the votes Lincoln received were cast in border counties of what would soon become West Virginia – the future state accounted for 1,832 of Lincoln's 1,929 votes.{{Cite web|url=http://www.virginiamemory.com/docs/1860_election_returns.pdf?_ga=1.106676996.686399364.1492562750|title=Results by county in Virginia}} Lincoln received no votes at all in 121 of the state's at-the-time 145 counties (including 31 of the 50 that would form West Virginia), received a single vote in three counties and received ten or fewer votes in nine of the 24 counties where he polled votes. Lincoln's best results, by far, were in the four counties that comprised the state's northern panhandle, a region which had long felt alienated from Richmond, was economically and culturally linked to its neighbors Ohio and Pennsylvania and would become the key driver in the successful effort to form a separate state. Hancock County (Virginia's northernmost at the time) returned Lincoln's best result – he polled over 40% of the vote there and finished in second place (Lincoln polled only eight votes fewer than Breckinridge). Of the 97 votes cast for Lincoln in the state's post-1863 boundaries, 93 were polled in four counties along the Potomac River and four were tallied in the coastal city of Portsmouth.

Although Lincoln received no votes in 10 Southern states, this was not because he was removed from the ballot in those states, but rather due to the Republican Party's absence in those states (parties rather than states printed ballots in that era).{{Cite news |last=Frank |first=BrieAnna J. |title=Trump, Lincoln ballot comparison meme 'doesn't hold water,' experts say {{!}} Fact check |url=https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2024/01/08/false-claim-states-removed-lincoln-from-ballot-in-1860-fact-check/72121760007/ |access-date=2024-06-28 |work=USA Today |language=en-US}}{{Cite web |last=McWhirter |first=Christian |date=2024-01-26 |title=Was Lincoln 'removed' from Southern presidential ballots? |url=https://presidentlincoln.illinois.gov/Blog/Posts/181/Abraham-Lincoln/2024/1/Was-Lincoln-removed-from-Southern-presidential-ballots/blog-post/ |access-date=2024-06-28 |website=Abraham Lincoln Presidential Library and Museum |language=en}}

One key difference between modern elections and those of the mid-nineteenth century is that at the time the state did not print and distribute ballots. In theory, any document containing a valid or at least non-excessive number names of citizens of a particular state (provided they were eligible to vote in the electoral college within that state) might have been accepted as a valid presidential ballot; however, what this meant in practice was that a candidate's campaign was responsible for printing and distributing their own ballots (this service was typically done by supportive newspaper publishers). Moreover, since voters did not choose the president directly, but rather presidential electors, the only way for a voter to meaningfully support a particular candidate for president was cast a ballot for citizens of his state who would have pledged to vote for the candidate in the Electoral College. In ten southern slave states, no citizen would publicly pledge to vote for Abraham Lincoln, so citizens there had no legal means to vote for the Republican nominee. In most of Virginia, no publisher would print ballots for Lincoln's pledged electors. While a citizen without access to a ballot for Lincoln could theoretically have still voted for him by means of a write-in ballot provided his state had electors pledged to Lincoln and the voter knew their identities, casting a ballot in favor of the Republican candidate in a strongly pro-slavery county would have incurred (at minimum) social ostracization (of course, casting a vote for Breckinridge in a strongly abolitionist county ran a voter the same risk).{{citation needed|date=April 2023}}

In the four slave states that did not secede (Missouri, Kentucky, Maryland, and Delaware), Lincoln came in fourth in every state except Delaware (where he finished third). Within the fifteen slave states, Lincoln won only two counties out of 996, Missouri's St. Louis and Gasconade counties. In the 1856 election, the Republican candidate for president had received no votes at all in twelve of the fourteen slave states with a popular vote (these being the same states as in the 1860 election, plus Missouri and Virginia).

{{multiple image

| align = right

| caption_align = center

| direction = vertical

| width = 220

| image1 = LincolnInauguration1861a.jpg

| width1 = 220

| alt1 = The unfinished Capitol dome, 1860

| caption1 = Inauguration of Abraham Lincoln
the Capitol, March 4, 1861

| image2 = ElectoralCollege1860.svg

| width2 = 220

| alt2 = 1860 Electoral College map with 35 states.

| caption2 = State election results
by Electoral College vote

| image3 = US SlaveFree1860.gif

| width3 = 220

| alt3 = States and territories that made slavery legal {{legend|#2DCCFF|}}{{legend|#A1C5F2|}} or illegal {{legend|#FF8F92|}}{{legend|#E8B1AE|}} while the election was held.

| caption3 = {{legend|#FF8F92|Presence of slavery}} during the election

}}

The election was held on Tuesday, November 6, 1860, and was noteworthy for the exaggerated sectionalism and voter enthusiasm in a country that was soon to dissolve into civil war. Voter turnout was 81.2%, the highest in American history up to that time, and the second-highest overall (exceeded only in the election of 1876).The 1876 election had a turnout of 81.8%, slightly higher than 1860. Between 1828 and 1928: {{cite web |url=http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/data/turnout.php |title=Voter Turnout in Presidential Elections: 1828–2008 |work=The American Presidency Project |publisher= UC Santa Barbara |access-date=2012-11-09}}Data between 1932 and 2008: {{cite web |url=https://www.census.gov/compendia/statab/2012/tables/12s0397.pdf |title=Table 397. Participation in Elections for President and U.S. Representatives: 1932 to 2010 |work=U.S. Census Bureau, Statistical Abstract of the United States: 2012 |publisher=U.S. Census Bureau |access-date=February 7, 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121024105846/http://www.census.gov/compendia/statab/2012/tables/12s0397.pdf |archive-date=October 24, 2012 |url-status=dead |df=mdy-all}} 31.5% of the voting age population voted.{{sfn|Abramson|Aldrich|Rohde|1995|p=99}}

Since Andrew Jackson had won re-election in 1832, all six subsequent presidents had only won one term, while the last four of those had won with a popular vote under 51 percent.{{cite web |url=http://www.uselectionatlas.org/RESULTS/ |title=United States Presidential Election Results |website=uselectionatlas.org |access-date=July 19, 2022}} Only Franklin Pierce had achieved a statistical majority in the popular vote (50.83 percent).

File:PresidentialCounty1860Colorbrewer.gif

Lincoln won the Electoral College with less than 40 percent of the popular vote nationwide by carrying states above the Mason–Dixon line and north of the Ohio River, plus the states of California and Oregon in the Far West. Unlike every preceding president-elect, Lincoln did not carry even one slave state; he instead carried all eighteen free states exclusively.

There were no ballots distributed for Lincoln in ten of the Southern states: Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, and Texas. This withheld 61 potential electoral votes from Lincoln, a fifth of what was the total 303 available to the other candidates. In a similar divide between North and South electors, Breckenridge carried nine of the ten states that withheld Lincoln from the ballot, the exception being Tennessee.

Lincoln was, therefore, the second President-elect to poll no votes in some states that had a popular vote (the first was John Quincy Adams, who polled no ballots in the popular votes of two states in the election of 1824, the only other election in which there were four major candidates, none of whom distributed ballots in every state). It should be further noted that, prior to the introduction of the secret ballot in the 1880s, the concept of ballot access did not exist in the sense it does today: there was no standardized state-issued ballot for a candidate to "appear" on. Instead, presidential ballots were printed and distributed by agents of the candidates and their parties, who organized slates of would-be electors publicly pledged to vote for a particular candidate. The 1824 and 1860 presidential elections were the only two prior to the introduction of the secret ballot where a winning candidate was so unpopular in a particular region that it was impossible to organize and print ballots for a slate of eligible voters pledged to vote for that candidate in an entire state.

Since 1860, and excluding unreconstructed Southern states in 1868 and 1872, there have been two occasions where a Republican presidential candidate failed to poll votes in every state{{efn|In 1892, incumbent President Benjamin Harrison failed to poll votes in Florida because the state's Republicans supported Populist nominee James B. Weaver. In 1912, William Howard Taft was not on the ballot in South Dakota or California because the South Dakotan and Californian branches of the Republican Party nominated Progressive candidate Theodore Roosevelt as the official Republican candidate.}}, while national Democratic candidates have failed to appear on all state ballots in three elections since the introduction of the secret ballot, though in all three, the Democratic candidate nonetheless won the presidency,{{efn|In 1892, Grover Cleveland was not on the ballot in Colorado, Idaho, Kansas, North Dakota, or Wyoming, while neither Harry Truman in 1948 nor Lyndon Johnson in 1964 were on the ballot in Alabama.}} but none of them were off the ballot in as many states as Lincoln in 1860.

Lincoln won the second-lowest share of the popular vote among all winning presidential candidates in U.S. history.{{efn|John Quincy Adams, who won the 1824 presidential election in a vote of the House of Representatives, won 30.92% of the popular vote, or 10.44% less than that of Andrew Jackson. Lincoln's share of the popular vote in 1860 represents the lowest share received by any popular vote winner.}} Lincoln's share of the popular vote would likely have been even lower if there had been a popular vote in South Carolina, though conversely it would likely have been marginally higher had he been on the ballot in all of the Southern states. The Republican victory resulted from the concentration of votes in the free states, which together controlled a majority of the presidential electors.Chadwick, Bruce. "Lincoln for President: an unlikely candidate, an audacious strategy, and the victory no one saw coming" (2009) Ch. 10 The Eleventh Hour. p. 289 {{ISBN|978-1-4022-2504-8}}

Lincoln's strategy was deliberately focused, in collaboration with Republican Party Chairman Thurlow Weed, on expanding on the states Frémont won four years earlier: New York was critical with 35 Electoral College votes, 11.5 percent of the total, and with Pennsylvania (27) and Ohio (23) as well, a candidate could collect 85 votes, whereas 152 were required to win. The Wide Awakes young Republican men's organization massively expanded registered voter lists, and although Lincoln was not even on the ballot in most Southern states, population increases in the free states had far exceeded those seen in the slave states for many years before the election of 1860, hence free states dominated in the Electoral College.Ziegler-McPherson, Christina A.; Selling America : Immigration Promotion and the Settlement of the American Continent, 1607-1914, pp. 34–36 {{ISBN|1440842094}} Gasconade County, Missouri has voted for a Republican presidential candidate in every election from 1860 on, which, as of 2024, makes it the longest Republican winning streak in presidential elections in the nation.Menendez, Albert J.; The Geography of Presidential Elections in the United States, 1868-2004, pp. 239-246 {{ISBN|0786422173}}

Despite Lincoln's commanding victory, this was the first election in American history in which the winner failed to win a majority of votes in his home county, with Lincoln narrowly losing Sangamon County, Illinois to Douglas, his main opponent in the North.

The split in the Democratic party is sometimes held responsible for Lincoln's victorye.g., the 1912 Catholic Encyclopedia, vol, 15, p. 171 even though Lincoln won the election with less than 40% of the popular vote, as much of the anti-Republican vote was "wasted" in Southern states in which no ballots for Lincoln were circulated. Lincoln also won outright majorities in enough states, that if he lost all states that he took with pluralities, he would still have enough electoral votes to win. At most, a single opponent nationwide would have deprived Lincoln of only California, Oregon, and four New Jersey electors,{{cite news |url=https://www.nytimes.com/1892/12/26/archives/newjerseys-vote-in-1860-how-the-electoral-college-happened-to-be.html |title=New Jersey's Vote in 1860 |newspaper=NY Times |date=December 26, 1892}} whose combined total of eleven electoral votes would have made no difference to the result since every other state won by the Republicans was won by a clear majority of the vote: in this scenario, Lincoln would have received 169 electoral votes, 17 more than the 152 required to win.

In the states of New York, Pennsylvania, and New Jersey where anti-Lincoln votes were combined into fusion tickets, Lincoln still won two and split New Jersey. Despite this, a shift of 25,000 votes to the fusion ticket in New York would have left Lincoln with 145 electoral votes - seven votes short of winning the Electoral College - and forced a contingent election in the House of Representatives.Potter, The impending crisis, 1848–1861 (1976) p. 437Luthin, The First Lincoln Campaign p. 227 Of the five states that Lincoln failed to carry despite polling votes, he received 20 percent of the vote in only one (Delaware), and 10 percent of the vote in only one more (Missouri).

Like Lincoln, Breckinridge and Bell won no electoral votes outside of their respective sections. While Bell retired to his family business, quietly supporting his state's secession, Breckinridge served as a Confederate general. He finished second in the Electoral College with 72 votes, carrying eleven of fifteen slave states (including South Carolina, whose electors were chosen by the state legislature, not popular vote). Breckinridge stood a distant third in national popular vote at eighteen percent, but accrued 50 to 75 percent in the first seven states that would form the Confederate States of America. He took nine of the eleven states that eventually joined, plus the border slave states of Delaware and Maryland, losing only Virginia and Tennessee. Breckinridge received very little support in the free states, showing some strength only in California, Oregon, Pennsylvania, and Connecticut.

Bell carried three slave states (Tennessee, Kentucky, and Virginia) and lost Maryland by only 722 votes. Nevertheless, he finished a remarkable second in all slave states won by Breckinridge or Douglas. He won 45 to 47 percent in Maryland, Tennessee, and North Carolina and canvassed respectably with 36 to 40 percent in Missouri, Arkansas, Louisiana, Georgia, and Florida. Bell himself had hoped that he would take over the former support of the extinct Whig Party in free states, but the majority of this support went to Lincoln.Davies, Gareth and Zelizer, Julian E.; America at the Ballot Box: Elections and Political History, pp. 65-66 {{ISBN|0812291360}} Thus, except for running mate Everett's home state of Massachusetts, and California, Bell received even less support in the free states than did Breckinridge, and consequently came in last in the national popular vote, at 12.62%.

Douglas was the only candidate who won electoral votes in both slave and free states (free New Jersey and slave Missouri). His support was the most widespread geographically; he finished second behind Lincoln in the popular vote with 29.52%, but last in the Electoral College. His 12 electoral votes are the lowest for a Democrat in history. Douglas attained a 28 to 47% share in the states of the Mid-Atlantic, Midwest, and Trans-Mississippi West, but slipped to 19 to 39% in New England. Outside his regional section, Douglas took 15 to 17% of the popular vote total in the slave states of Kentucky, Alabama, and Louisiana, then 10 percent or less in the nine remaining slave states. Douglas, in his "Norfolk Doctrine", reiterated in North Carolina, promised to keep the Union together by coercion if states proceeded to secede: the popular vote for Lincoln and Douglas combined was 69.17% of the turnout.

The 1860 Republican ticket was the first successful national ticket that did not feature a Southerner, and the election marked the end of Southern political dominance in the United States. Between 1789 and 1860, Southerners had been president for two-thirds of the era, and had held the offices of Speaker of the House and President pro tempore of the Senate during much of that time. Moreover, since 1791, Southerners had comprised a majority of the Supreme Court.{{cite book| title=Liberty Equality Power: A History of the American People, Volume I: To 1877| page=403| edition=6th| last1=Murrin| first1=John M.| last2=Johnson| first2=Paul E.| last3=McPherson| first3=James M.| last4=Fahs| first4=Alice| last5=Gerstle| first5=Gary| last6=Rosenberg| first6=Emily S.| last7=Rosenberg| first7=Norman L. |publisher= Wadsworth, Cengage Learning |location=Boston| isbn=978-0-495-91587-4| date=January 2011}}

File: United States Electoral College 1860.svg

{{start U.S. presidential ticket box|pv_footnote={{sfn|Dubin|2002|p=159}}|ev_footnote=}}

{{U.S. presidential ticket box row|name=Abraham Lincoln|vp_name=Hannibal Hamlin|party=Republican|state=Illinois|vp_state=Maine|pv=1,855,276|pv_pct=39.67%|ev=180}}

{{U.S. presidential ticket box row|name=John C. Breckinridge|vp_name=Joseph Lane|party=Southern Democratic|state=Kentucky|vp_state=Oregon|pv=672,601|pv_pct=14.38%|ev=72}}

{{U.S. presidential ticket box row|name=John Bell|vp_name=Edward Everett|party=Constitutional Union|state=Tennessee|vp_state=Massachusetts|pv=590,980|pv_pct=12.64%|ev=39}}

{{U.S. presidential ticket box row|name=Stephen A. Douglas|vp_name=Herschel V. Johnson|party=Northern Democratic|state=Illinois|vp_state=Georgia|pv=1,004,042|pv_pct=21.47%|ev=12}}

{{U.S. presidential ticket box row|name=Fusion|vp_name=Fusion|party=Various|state=—|vp_state=—|pv=553,570|pv_pct=11.84%|ev=—}}

{{U.S. presidential ticket box row|name=Gerrit Smith|vp_name=Samuel McFarland|party=Liberty (Union)|state=New York|vp_state=Pennsylvania|pv=176|pv_pct=0.004%|ev=—}}

{{end U.S. presidential ticket box|pv=4,676,645|ev=303|to_win=152}}

Source (Electoral Vote): {{National Archives EV source| year=1860| as of=July 31, 2005}}

^(a) The popular vote figures exclude South Carolina where the Electors were chosen by the state legislature rather than by popular vote.

{{bar box

|title=Popular vote

|titlebar=#ddd

|width=600px

|barwidth=410px

|bars=

{{bar stacked|Lincoln|^(b){{Right|39.67%}}|{{party color|Republican Party (US)}}|163.262||163|#DDDDDD|82.533}}

{{bar percent|Douglas|{{party color|Democratic Party (US)}}|21.47}}

{{bar percent|Breckinridge|{{party color|Southern Democratic (United States)}}|14.38}}

{{bar percent|Bell|{{party color|Constitutional Union Party (United States)}}|12.64}}

{{bar percent|Fusion|#777777|11.84}}

{{bar percent|Smith|#777777|0.004}}

}}

{{bar box

|title=Electoral vote

|titlebar=#ddd

|width=600px

|barwidth=410px

|bars=

{{bar stacked|Lincoln|^(b){{Right|59.41%}}|{{party color|Republican Party (US)}}|243.581||82|#DDDDDD|82.533}}

{{bar percent|Breckinridge|{{party color|Southern Democratic (United States)}}|23.76}}

{{bar percent|Bell|{{party color|Constitutional Union Party (United States)}}|12.87}}

{{bar percent|Douglas|{{party color|Democratic Party (US)}}|3.96}}

}}

^(b) The option of Lincoln was absent from 20.13% of ballots across ten states. He was available to only 79.87% of the voters that were available to the other candidates.

1860 United States Presidential Election Counties.svg|Vector Map of presidential election results by county

PresidentialCounty1860Colorbrewer.gif|Map of presidential election results by county

RepublicanPresidentialCounty1860Colorbrewer.gif|Map of Republican presidential election results by county

NorthernDemocraticPresidentialCounty1860Colorbrewer.gif|Map of Northern Democratic presidential election results by county

SouthernDemocraticPresidentialCounty1860Colorbrewer.gif|Map of Southern Democratic presidential election results by county

ConstitutionalUnionPresidentialCounty1860Colorbrewer.gif|Map of Constitutional Union presidential election results by county

FusionPresidentialCounty1860Colorbrewer.gif|Map of "Fusion" slate presidential election results by county

CartogramPresidentialCounty1860Colorbrewer.gif|Cartogram of presidential election results by county

CartogramRepublicanPresidentialCounty1860Colorbrewer.gif|Cartogram of Republican presidential election results by county

CartogramNorthernDemocraticPresidentialCounty1860Colorbrewer.gif|Cartogram of Northern Democratic presidential election results by county

CartogramSouthernDemocraticPresidentialCounty1860Colorbrewer.gif|Cartogram of Southern Democratic presidential election results by county

CartogramConstitutionalUnionPresidentialCounty1860Colorbrewer.gif|Cartogram of Constitutional Union presidential election results by county

CartogramFusionPresidentialCounty1860Colorbrewer.gif|Cartogram of "Fusion" slate presidential election results by county

Source{{sfn|Dubin|2002|p=159–188}}

• Kentucky
• Tennessee
• Virginia

• Maryland

• California
• Illinois
• Indiana
• Pennsylvania

States where the margin of victory was under 1%:

1. Virginia 0.2% (341 votes)
2. Missouri 0.33% (543 votes)
3. California 0.59% (709 votes)
4. Maryland 0.8% (737 votes)

States where the margin of victory was under 5%:

1. Oregon 1.83% (270 votes)
2. Tennessee 3.19% (4,657 votes)
3. North Carolina 3.69% (3,549 votes)
4. Illinois 3.81% (12,842 votes)
5. New Jersey 3.74% (4,525 votes)
6. Louisiana 4.90% (2,477 votes)

States where the margin of victory was under 10%:

1. New York 7.4% (48,703 votes) (tipping point state for Lincoln's victory)
2. Georgia 8.64% (9,227 votes)
3. Indiana 8.77% (23,847 votes)
4. Kentucky 8.83% (12,915 votes)

Counties with highest percentage of Republican vote:

1. Kanabec County, Minnesota - 100.00%
2. Emmet County, Iowa - 100.00%
3. Mille Lacs County, Minnesota - 94.74%
4. Grundy County, Iowa - 88.13%
5. Hancock County, Iowa - 87.88%

Counties with highest percentage of Southern Democratic vote:

1. Brevard County, Florida - 100.00%
2. Dade County, Florida - 100.00%
3. Hidalgo County, Texas - 100.00%
4. Manatee County, Florida - 100.00%
5. Zapata County, Texas - 100.00%

Counties with highest percentage of Constitutional Union vote:

1. Stanly County, North Carolina - 93.78%
2. Montgomery County, North Carolina - 87.35%
3. Montgomery County, Georgia - 84.72%
4. Camden County, North Carolina - 84.68%
5. Bandera County, Texas - 84.21%

Counties with highest percentage of Democratic vote:

1. Johnson County, Illinois - 96.96%
2. Hamilton County, Illinois - 88.54%
3. Palo Alto County, Iowa - 87.88%
4. Saline County, Illinois - 85.44%
5. Pope County, Illinois - 85.07%

Counties with highest percentage of Fusion vote:

1. Hamilton County, New York - 77.7%
2. Pike County, Pennsylvania - 68.56%
3. New York County, New York - 65.24%
4. Sussex County, New Jersey - 63.58%
5. Richmond County, New York - 62.73%

{{see also|Origins of the American Civil War|Presidency of James Buchanan#Secession}}

Lincoln's victory and imminent inauguration as president was the immediate cause for declarations of secession by seven Southern states (South Carolina, Mississippi, Florida, Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana, and Texas) from 20 December 1860 to 1 February 1861. They then formed the Confederate States of America. On 9 February 1861, Jefferson Davis was elected president of the Confederacy.

Several other states also considered declaring secession at the time:

• Missouri convened a secession convention, which voted against secession and adjourned permanently.
• Arkansas convened a secession convention, which voted against secession and adjourned temporarily.[https://encyclopediaofarkansas.net/entries/secession-convention-6304/ Secession Convention] Encyclopedia of Arkansas
• Virginia convened a secession convention, which voted against secession but remained in session.
• Tennessee held a referendum on having a secession convention, which failed.
• North Carolina held a referendum on having a secession convention, which failed.[https://www.ncdcr.gov/blog/2015/05/20/secession-vote-and-realigned-allegiance Secession Vote and Realigned Allegiance] North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources

All of the secessionist activity was motivated by fear for the institution of slavery in the South. If the President (and, by extension, the appointed federal officials in the South, such as district attorneys, marshals, postmasters, and judges) opposed slavery, it might collapse. There were fears that abolitionist agents would infiltrate the South and foment slave insurrections. (The noted secessionist William Lowndes Yancey, speaking at New York's Cooper Institute in October 1860, asserted that with abolitionists in power, "Emissaries will percolate between master [and] slave as water between the crevices of rocks underground. They will be found everywhere, with strychnine to put in our wells."{{cite book | author=Walther, Eric H. | year=2006 | title=William Lowndes Yancey: The Coming of the Civil War | isbn=978-0-7394-8030-4 |page=262}}) Less radical Southerners thought that with Northern antislavery dominance of the federal government, slavery would eventually be abolished, regardless of present constitutional limits.Avery Craven, [http://lsupress.org/books/detail/the-growth-of-southern-nationalism-1848-1861/ The Growth of Southern Nationalism, 1848–1861], 1953. {{ISBN|978-0-8071-0006-6}}, p. 391, 394, 396.

Bertram Wyatt-Brown argues that secessionists desired independence as necessary for their honor. They could no longer tolerate Northern state attitudes that regarded slave ownership as a great sin and Northern politicians who insisted on stopping the spread of slavery.{{cite book |first=Mary A. |last=Decredico |chapter=Sectionalism and the Secession Crisis |editor-first=John B. |editor-last=Boles |title=A Companion to the American South |year=2004 |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=vANndXTE8g4C&pg=PA243 |page=243 |publisher=John Wiley & Sons |isbn=9781405138307 }}Wyatt-Brown, Bertram. Yankee Saints and Southern Sinners (1990){{cite book |first=Mary A. |last=Decredico |chapter=Sectionalism and the Secession Crisis |editor-first=John B. |editor-last=Boles |title=A Companion to the American South |year=2004 |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=vANndXTE8g4C&pg=PA240 |page=240|publisher=John Wiley & Sons |isbn=9781405138307 }}

Another bloc of Southerners resented Northern criticism of slavery and restrictions on slavery but opposed secession as dangerous and unnecessary. However, the "conditional Unionists" also hoped that when faced with secession, Northerners would stifle anti-slavery rhetoric and accept pro-slavery rules for the territories. It was that group that prevented immediate secession in Virginia, North Carolina, Tennessee, and Arkansas when

Lincoln took office on March 4, 1861. He took no action against the secessionists in the seven "Confederate" states, but also declared that secession had no legal validity and refused to surrender federal property in those states. (He also reiterated his opposition to slavery anywhere in the territories.) Preparing to form an army, on 6 March 1861 Davis called for 100,000 volunteers to serve for twelve months."https://web.archive.org/web/20161021171757/http://www.history.army.mil/books/AMH/AMH-09.htm The Civil War, 1861". American Military History. U.S. Army Center of Military History. Archived from the original on 21 October 2016. Retrieved 3 July 2023. The political standoff continued until mid-April, when Davis ordered Confederate troops to bombard and capture Fort Sumter.

Lincoln then called for troops to put down rebellion, which wiped out the possibility that the crisis could be resolved by compromise. Nearly all "conditional Unionists" joined the secessionists, including for example presidential candidate John Bell of the Constitutional Union Party, whose home state of Tennessee was the last to secede.Jonathan Atkins, "[http://tennesseeencyclopedia.net/entry.php?rec=72 John Bell]," Tennessee Encyclopedia of History and Culture, 2009. Retrieved: October 10, 2012. The Virginia convention and the reconvened Arkansas convention both declared secession, as did the legislatures of Tennessee and North Carolina; all four states joined the Confederacy. Missouri stayed in the United States, but had an unrecognized dual government.

After the Civil War begun, Douglas then threw his support behind Lincoln and undertook a tour to bolster support for the Union, making visits to Virginia, Ohio and Illinois. Douglas declared "There are no neutrals, only patriots and traitors". However, three months after Lincoln's inauguration, Douglas contracted typhoid fever and died in Chicago on June 3, 1861.

• 1860–61 United States House of Representatives elections
• 1860–61 United States Senate elections
• American election campaigns in the 19th century
• Electoral history of Abraham Lincoln
• First inauguration of Abraham Lincoln
• John Hanks
• History of the United States (1849–1865)
• History of the United States Democratic Party
• History of the United States Republican Party
• Third Party System

{{notelist}}

{{reflist}}

• {{cite book|last1=Abramson |first1=Paul |last2=Aldrich |first2=John |last3=Rohde |first3=David |title=Change and Continuity in the 1992 Elections |publisher=CQ Press |date=1995 |isbn=0871878399}}

{{refbegin}}

• Achorn, Edward (2023). The Lincoln Miracle: Inside the Republican Convention That Changed History. Atlantic Monthly Press
• {{Cite book |last=Dubin |first=Michael J. |title=United States Presidential Elections, 1788-1860: The Official Results by County and State |publisher=McFarland & Company |year=2002 |isbn=9780786410170}}
• {{cite book | ref=Carwardine |first=Richard |last=Carwardine | author-link = Richard Carwardine |title=Lincoln |publisher=Pearson Education Ltd |year=2003 |isbn=978-0-582-03279-8}}
• {{cite book|author=Chadwick, Bruce | author-link = Bruce Chadwick |title=Lincoln for President: An Unlikely Candidate, An Audacious Strategy, and the Victory No One Saw Coming |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=1UUDW_c4mEoC&pg=PA108|year=2010|publisher=Sourcebooks, Inc.|isbn=978-1-4022-2858-2}}
• Decredico, Mary A. "Sectionalism and the Secession Crisis," in John B. Boles, ed., A Companion to the American South (2004) [https://books.google.com/books?id=vANndXTE8g4C&pg=PA240 pp. 231-248], on the historiography of Southern motivations
• {{cite book | ref=Donald |first=David Herbert |last=Donald | author-link = David Herbert Donald |title=Lincoln |location=New York |publisher=Simon and Schuster |year=1996 |orig-year=1995 |isbn=978-0-684-82535-9}}
• {{cite book |ref=Egerton |first=Douglas |last=Egerton |title=Year of Meteors: Stephen Douglas, Abraham Lincoln, and the Election That Brought on the Civil War |year=2010 |isbn=978-1-59691-619-7 |publisher=Bloomsbury Press |url-access=registration |url=https://archive.org/details/yearofmeteorsste0000eger }}
• Fite, Emerson David. The Presidential Campaign of 1860 (1911). [https://archive.org/details/cu31924032772323 online]
• {{cite book | ref=Foner |first=Eric |last=Foner | author-link = Eric Foner |title=Free Soil, Free Labor, Free Men: The Ideology of the Republican Party before the Civil War |year=1995 |orig-year=1970 |isbn=978-0-19-509497-8 |publisher=Oxford University Press}}
• Franson, Melissa. "Wide Awakes, Half Asleeps, Little Giants, and Bell Ringers: Political Partisanship in the Catskills of New York during the Elections of 1860 and 1862". New York History 102.1 (2021): 149–171. [https://muse.jhu.edu/article/797242/summary excerpt]
• Fuller, A. James, ed. (2013). The Election of 1860 Reconsidered. Kent State University Press [http://muse.jhu.edu/books/9781612776224 online]
• Thomas E. Rodgers, "Saving the Republic: Turnout, Ideology, and Republicanism in the Election of 1860", in The Election of 1860 Reconsidered ch. 6.
• Gabrial, Brian. "The Democrats Divide: Newspaper Coverage of the 1860 Presidential Conventions" in Sachsman, David B. and Borchard, Gregory A. with Lisica, Dea, eds. The Antebellum Press: Setting the State for Civil War (New York: Routledge, 2019) pp. 201–211.
• {{cite book |ref=Goodwin |first=Doris Kearns |last=Goodwin |author-link=Doris Kearns Goodwin |title=Team of Rivals: The Political Genius of Abraham Lincoln |isbn=0-684-82490-6 |year=2002 |publisher=Simon & Schuster |location=New York |url-access=registration |url=https://archive.org/details/teamofrivalspoli00good }}
• {{cite book|author=Green, Michael S. |title=Lincoln and the Election of 1860|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=6JquKwAlXOYC&pg=PA106|year= 2011|publisher=SIU Press|isbn=978-0-8093-8636-9}}
• Grinspan, Jon, "'Young Men for War': The Wide Awakes and Lincoln's 1860 Presidential Campaign," Journal of American History 96.2 (2009): [https://web.archive.org/web/20120825102042/http://www.mit.edu/~mi22295/elections.html#1860 online].
• {{cite book | ref=Harris |last=Harris |first=William C.| author-link=William C. Harris (historian)|title=Lincoln's Rise to the Presidency |isbn=978-0-7006-1520-9 |publisher=University Press of Kansas |location=Lawrence |year=2007 }}
• {{cite book |first=Michael F. |last=Holt |year=1978 |title=The Political Crisis of the 1850s}}
• Holt, Michael F. The Election of 1860: "A Campaign Fraught with Consequences (2017) [https://muse.jhu.edu/article/726873 online review]
• {{cite book |ref=Holzer |first=Harold |last=Holzer |author-link=Harold Holzer |title=Lincoln at Cooper Union: The Speech That Made Abraham Lincoln President |year=2004 |publisher=Simon & Schuster |isbn=978-0-7432-9964-0 |url-access=registration |url=https://archive.org/details/lincolnatcooperu00haro_0 }}
• Johannsen, Robert W. (1973). Stephen A. Douglas. Oxford University Press.
• {{cite book |first=Frederick C. |last=Luebke |year=1971 |title=Ethnic Voters and the Election of Lincoln|url=https://archive.org/details/ethnicvoterselec0000lueb |url-access=registration |publisher=Lincoln, University of Nebraska Press |isbn=9780803207967 }}
• {{cite book | ref=Luthin |first=Reinhard H. |last=Luthin | author-link = Reinhard H. Luthin |title=The First Lincoln Campaign |isbn=978-0-8446-1292-8 |year=1944 |publisher=Harvard University Press |location=Cambridge, MA}} along with Nevins, the most detailed narrative of the election
• Nevins, Allan. Ordeal of the Union (8 volumes, Macmillan, 1947–1971), detailed scholarly coverage of every election, 1848 to 1864. See vol. 4 (1950) "The Emergence of Lincoln", vol. 2 "Prologue to Civil War 1857-1861", pp. 200-317 [https://archive.org/details/emergenceoflinco0002unse/page/n8/mode/1up online]
• Nichols, Roy Franklin. The Disruption of American Democracy (1948), pp. 348–506, focused on the Democratic party [https://archive.org/details/TheDisruptionOfAmericanDemocracy online]
• Parks, Joseph Howard (1950). John Bell of Tennessee. Louisiana State University Press.
• {{cite book | ref=Potter |last=Potter |first=David M. | author-link = David M. Potter |title=The Impending Crisis, 1848–1861 |publisher=HarperCollins |year=1976 |isbn=978-0-06-131929-7|title-link=The Impending Crisis, 1848–1861 }}
• {{cite book |first=James Ford |last=Rhodes | author-link = James Ford Rhodes |year=1912 |title=History of the United States from the Compromise of 1850 to the Final Restoration of Home Rule at the South in 1877 |volume=II |url=https://archive.org/details/historyunitedst13rhodgoog/page/n7/mode/1up}}
• {{cite book |first=James Ford |last=Rhodes | author-link = James Ford Rhodes |year=1920 |title=History of the United States from the Compromise of 1859 to the McKinley-Bryan Campaign of 1896}}
• Simpson, John Eddins. “Howell Cobb's Bid for the Presidency in 1860.” The Georgia Historical Quarterly 55, no. 1 (1971): 102–13. [http://www.jstor.org/stable/40579191 online.]
• Wells, Damon. Stephen Douglas: The Last Years, 1857–1861 (1971), [https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.7560/701182-toc/html online]
• Woods, Michael E. Arguing Until Doomsday: Stephen Douglas, Jefferson Davis, and the Struggle for American Democracy (UNC Press Books, 2020). [https://muse.jhu.edu/article/805791/summary online review]

{{refend}}

• Chester, Edward W. A Guide to Political Platforms (1977), pp. 72–79 [https://archive.org/details/guidetopolitical0000ches online]
• Porter, Kirk H. and Donald Bruce Johnson, eds. National Party Platforms, 1840-1964 (1965) [https://archive.org/details/nationalpartypla00port online 1840-1956]

{{Commons category}}

• [https://web.archive.org/web/20120825102042/http://www.mit.edu/~mi22295/elections.html#1860 1860 election: State-by-state Popular vote results]
• [http://geoelections.free.fr/USA/elec_comtes/1860.htm 1860 popular vote by counties]
• [https://web.archive.org/web/20081127040239/http://fisher.lib.virginia.edu/collections/stats/elections/maps/1860.gif Electoral Map from 1860]
• [http://www.shapell.org/manuscript.aspx?abraham-lincoln-1860-election-skies-look-bright Abraham Lincoln: Original Letters and Manuscripts, 1860] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140511153443/http://www.shapell.org/manuscript.aspx?abraham-lincoln-1860-election-skies-look-bright |date=May 11, 2014 }} Shapell Manuscript Foundation
• [https://web.archive.org/web/20120825102042/http://www.mit.edu/~mi22295/elections.html#1860 Lincoln's election – details]
• [http://members.tripod.com/~greatamericanhistory/gr02010.htm Report on 1860 Republican convention]
• [https://www.loc.gov/rr/program/bib/presidents/lincoln/ Abraham Lincoln: A Resource Guide] from the Library of Congress
• [https://www.loc.gov/rr/program/bib/elections/election1860.html Presidential Election of 1860: A Resource Guide] from the Library of Congress
• [http://www.countingthevotes.com/1860/ Election of 1860 in Counting the Votes] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171003225346/http://www.countingthevotes.com/1860/ |date=October 3, 2017 }}

{{United States presidential election, 1860}}

{{USPresidentialElections}}

{{US Third Party Election}}

{{State Results of the 1860 U.S. presidential election}}

{{Abraham Lincoln}}

{{Authority control}}

Category:Origins of the American Civil War

Category:Presidency of James Buchanan

Category:Presidency of Abraham Lincoln

Category:Abraham Lincoln

Category:Hannibal Hamlin

Category:John C. Breckinridge

Category:Stephen A. Douglas

Category:Secession crisis of 1860–61

Category:November 1860