:en:User talk:Scimitar

Thank you for your advice. With the deepest respect, and given that the article which was expanded last month is now clearly wikipedic, in my view the version which I deleted in June still qualifies as NN-bio. There are several vandalised version of the page of earlier dates, which are of no relevance, and which played no part in my decision. --Anthony.bradbury^"talk" 22:11, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

:No, you are correct. I misread the history. My apologies. --Anthony.bradbury^"talk" 20:01, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Ice Hockey/Newsletter/Intro2}}

{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Ice Hockey/Newsletter/box-footer|}}

{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography/Outreach/Newsletter/Issue 005}}

To receive this newsletter in the future, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. This newsletter was delivered by the automated R Delivery Bot 15:59, 7 October 2007 (UTC) .

{{{icon|25px }}}Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When using certain templates on talk pages{{#if:{{{1|}}}|, as you did to :{{{1}}}}}, don't forget to substitute with text by adding subst: to the template tag. For example, use {{subst:uw-test1}} instead of {{uw-test1}}. This reduces server load and prevents accidental blanking of the template. {{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{2|}}}|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}} Also, please be aware of the new User Warning Templates at Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace. Thanks!   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 20:02, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

You are correct. Walcot's fraudulent claims aren't really relevant to Brock's story. I might do a quick brief article on Walcot, under the grouping of Walter Mittys / Baron Munchhausens or whatever HLGallon (talk) 06:03, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

Image:Nuvola apps important yellow.svg

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Borsk Fey'lya, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{tl|dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{tl|db-author}} to the top of Borsk Fey'lya. Terraxos (talk) 15:04, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Image:Nuvola apps important yellow.svg

Another editor has added the {{tl|prod}} template to the article Lieutenant Page, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{tl|prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 18:01, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Isaac Brock has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are Wikipedia:Featured_article_review/{{#if:. —Preceding unsigned comment added by EasyPeasy21 (talk • contribs) 15:49, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

:Hello Scimitar. I've obtained some books that cover Brock's role in the early war of 1812. They include Pierre Berton, The invasion of Canada. I notice that there are no inline cites to Berton at present in this article, and I might be able to help with that. Are you still actively working on more improvements? I don't want to get in your way. I also had a few thoughts for the style of the lead, but I'd review them with you first. EdJohnston (talk) 14:16, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

Image:Ambox warning yellow.svg

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Lieutenant Page, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{tl|dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. --EEMIV (talk) 15:06, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Image:Ambox warning pn.svgI have nominated Lieutenant Page, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lieutenant Page. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. --EEMIV (talk) 16:49, 19 October 2008 (UTC) --EEMIV (talk) 16:49, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

can you please vote again on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Uwe_Kils_(3rd_nomination).

Best wishes Uwe Kils 15:58, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

30px Hello Scimitar! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 6 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current {{PAGESINCATEGORY:All_unreferenced_BLPs}} article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{tl|unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

1. Brad Werenka - {{findsources|Brad Werenka}}
2. Jason BeDuhn - {{findsources|Jason BeDuhn}}
3. Ziad al-Khasawneh - {{findsources|Ziad al-Khasawneh}}
4. Jay Blanchard - {{findsources|Jay Blanchard}}
5. Igor Ulanov - {{findsources|Igor Ulanov}}
6. Jérôme Bicamumpaka - {{findsources|Jérôme Bicamumpaka}}

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 10:32, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

{{ {{#ifeq:|{{void}}|void|Error:must be substituted}}|Inactive admin}}

Image:Information.svg

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative privileges of users who have been inactive for one year, meaning administrators who have made neither any edits nor any logged actions in over one year. As a result of this discussion, your administrative privileges have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these privileges reinstated, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. RL0919 (talk) 22:18, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

File:Copyright-problem.svg

Thank you for uploading :File:William Waldegrave.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [{{fullurl:Special:Log|type=upload&user=Scimitar}} list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 02:15, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

Godfrey I, Count of Leuven, which you created, has been nominated to be moved. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments here. Moonraker (talk) 06:04, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

Hello. You are receiving this message because of a recent change to the administrator policy that alters what you were told at the time of your desysopping. The effect of the change is that you will not longer be able to request restoration of the tools because of your prior inactivity. You have until December 30, 2012 to request restoration or else the policy will prevent you from doing so in the future; you would need to seek a new WP:RFA. Until December 30, you can file a request at WP:BN for review by the crats. Thank you. MBisanz ^talk 04:22, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

(delivered by mabdul 23:47, 3 December 2012 (UTC))

Image:Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article John Green (Medal of Honor) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

:Completely unsourced, no way to verify the veracity of the information due to a visible lack of scholarly or otherwise reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. James ^{(T • C)} • 10:53pm • 11:53, 29 April 2014 (UTC)

{{Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:02, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Merge-arrows.svg An article that you have been involved in editing—Bosor—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Quest for Truth (talk) 22:06, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

Hello Scimitar,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Tyler Conklin for deletion, because it's too short to identify the subject of the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title={{urlencode:Talk:Tyler Conklin}}&action=edit§ion=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion], but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Dschslava ^Δx parlez moi 17:31, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article :Shacknasty Jim (band) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable band per WP:MUSICBIO / WP:GNG. Article maintained by a member. No claim to significance beyond mere existence.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Animalparty! (talk) 01:37, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

File:Information.svg A file that you uploaded or altered, :File:Brock portrait by JCH Forster.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 15:18, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

I have nominated Isaac Brock for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Z1720 (talk) 02:30, 27 August 2024 (UTC)