Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lieutenant Page

=[[Lieutenant Page]]=

:{{la|Lieutenant Page}} ([{{fullurl:Lieutenant Page|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lieutenant Page}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Inexplicably removed prod. Background window dressing in Zahn's novels and elsewhere; trivial character in-universe, wholly non-notable out-of-universe. Not worth merging into List of Star Wars characters per WP:RS, WP:NOT#PLOT, WP:NOT#DIR, WP:NOT#INFO. --EEMIV (talk) 16:49, 19 October 2008 (UTC)


:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:22, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

:*Lists of characters are supposed to be complete - Is this articulated anywhere in policy or even a guideline? If so, it's news to me and I'll go through and add a bunch of these windowdressing characters myself. --EEMIV (talk) 10:51, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

:*Featured lists are supposed to be comprehensive and complete and isn't that what lists should be aiming for? - Mgm|(talk) 12:06, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

:::I interpret complete in this context as named characters with spoken dialog (or in special cases a key role in the plot even without dialog). In this case, he apparent did have dialog & is not one of an undifferentiated mass. I agree that if someone says" Here's my team: A, B, c, D, and E," and none of them say anything, they are not characters worth mentioning here even in a list DGG (talk) 03:56, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.