2022 Nebraska's 1st congressional district special election

{{Short description|none}}

{{use mdy dates|date=March 2022}}

{{broader|Nebraska's 1st congressional district}}

{{Infobox election

| election_name = 2022 Nebraska's 1st congressional district special election

| country = Nebraska

| type = by-election

| previous_election = 2020 United States House of Representatives elections in Nebraska#District 1

| previous_year = 2020

| next_year = November 2022

| next_election = 2022 United States House of Representatives elections in Nebraska#District 1

| seats_for_election = {{ushr|NE|1}}

| election_date = June 28, 2022

| turnout = 28.44%

| image1 = File:Mike Flood 117th Congress (cropped).jpeg

| nominee1 = Mike Flood

| party1 = Republican Party (United States)

| popular_vote1 = 61,017

| percentage1 = 52.69%

| image2 = File:Patty Pansing Brooks (cropped).jpg

| nominee2 = Patty Pansing Brooks

| party2 = Democratic Party (United States)

| popular_vote2 = 54,783

| percentage2 = 47.31%

| map_image = 2022_Nebraska's_1st_congressional_district_special_election_results_map_by_county.svg

| map_size = x200px

| map_caption = Results by county
Flood: {{legend0|#E27F7F|50–60%}} {{legend0|#D75D5D|60–70%}} {{legend0|#C21B18|80–90%}}
Brooks: {{legend0|#7996E2|50–60%}}

| title = U.S. Representative

| before_election = Jeff Fortenberry

| before_party = Republican Party (United States)

| after_election = Mike Flood

| after_party = Republican Party (United States)

}}

{{ElectionsNE}}

The 2022 Nebraska's 1st congressional district special election, which was held on June 28, 2022, was triggered when Republican representative Jeff Fortenberry resigned on March 31, having been convicted of lying to the FBI about campaign contributions.{{cite news |last1=Alfaro |first1=Mariana |last2=Paúl |first2=María Luisa |title=Rep. Fortenberry to resign after being found guilty of lying to FBI |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/03/26/fortenberry-resigns-lying-fbi/ |access-date=March 26, 2022 |newspaper=The Washington Post |date=March 26, 2022}}{{Cite web |last=Earl |first=David |date=March 24, 2022 |title=Nebraska Congressman Jeff Fortenberry convicted for lying to FBI about foreign campaign contribution |url=https://www.ketv.com/article/nebraska-congressman-jeff-fortenberry-convicted-lying-fbi-foreign-campaign-contribution/39532704 |access-date=March 24, 2022 |website=KETV |language=en}}

Under Nebraska state law, major party nominees for special elections are selected by the party through its executive committee or party convention, with the special election scheduled by Governor Pete Ricketts within 90 days after the seat's vacancy.{{Cite web |title=Nebraska Revised Statute 32-564 |url=https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=32-564 |access-date=2022-03-27 |website=Nebraska Legislature}}{{Cite web |title=Nebraska Revised Statute 32-627 |url=https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=32-627 |access-date=2022-03-27 |website=Nebraska Legislature}}{{Cite web|url=https://www.ketv.com/article/june-28-special-election-set-for-nebraskas-us-congressional-district-1-seat/39614645|title = June 28 special election set for Nebraska's US Congressional District 1 seat|date = April 2, 2022}}

The election came under some controversy over the discovery that it would be held in the new post-2020 redistricting Nebraska's 1st congressional district. While some Nebraska officials claimed that the new map took immediate effect when signed, this was not in line with congressional rules which only recognized pre-2020 redistricting boundaries for the rest of 2022. It also caused confusion among Nebraska residents wanting to vote in the election or receive constituent services, especially as congressional funds are not allowed to be spent outside the recognized old district boundaries.{{Cite news |last=Cioffi |first=Chris |date=July 6, 2022 |title=Nebraska quirk used new map to fill House vacancy last month |work=Roll Call |url=https://rollcall.com/2022/07/06/nebraska-quirk-used-new-map-to-fill-house-vacancy-last-month/ |url-status=live |access-date=July 7, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220707023308/https://rollcall.com/2022/07/06/nebraska-quirk-used-new-map-to-fill-house-vacancy-last-month/ |archive-date=July 7, 2022}}

Against a backdrop of the Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization ruling four days before the election which overturned the landmark Roe v. Wade case on abortion, Republican nominee Mike Flood promoted his sponsorship of a 2010 Nebraska state law which banned abortions 20 weeks after fertilization in a campaign ad. Meanwhile, Democrat Patty Pansing Brooks highlighted her support for abortion rights, criticizing the Dobbs decision as an "assault on privacy" and "a step backward in American culture", and remarked that the election was the first instance where "we can fight back at the ballot box".{{Cite news |last1=Padmore |first1=William |last2=Bauer |first2=Will |date=June 28, 2022 |title=Flood Wins Special Election for Nebraska's 1st Congressional District |work=Nebraska Public Media |url=https://nebraskapublicmedia.org/en/news/news-articles/flood-wins-special-election-for-nes-1st-congressional-district/ |url-status=live |access-date=June 30, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220629135510/https://nebraskapublicmedia.org/en/news/news-articles/flood-wins-special-election-for-nes-1st-congressional-district/ |archive-date=June 29, 2022}}{{Cite news |last1=Schulte |first1=Grant |last2=Price |first2=Michelle L. |date=June 29, 2022 |title=Democrats energized by tight race in GOP-leaning Nebraska |agency=Associated Press |url=https://apnews.com/article/2022-midterm-elections-abortion-us-supreme-court-special-campaigns-5999008bca72fd90a587fed8e50fd3c8 |url-status=live |access-date=June 30, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220630034127/https://apnews.com/article/2022-midterm-elections-abortion-us-supreme-court-special-campaigns-5999008bca72fd90a587fed8e50fd3c8 |archive-date=June 30, 2022}}

After a campaign described by the Norfolk Daily News as "mostly positive" with "lighthearted" ads, Flood declared victory at 10:23 pm CDT, two hours after polls closed, promising to fight inflation, for which he blamed the policies of the Biden administration.

In light of the competitiveness of the election, (early results had shown Flood trailing Pansing Brooks) Nebraska Democratic Party chair Jane Kleeb released a statement that the national Democratic Party needed to invest more in rural areas considered to be "unwinnable" and that Pansing Brooks "connected with voters".{{Cite news |date=June 29, 2022 |title='Friends, we did it,' as Flood wins special election |work=Norfolk Daily News |url=https://norfolkdailynews.com/news/live-updates-friends-we-did-it-as-flood-appears-headed-to-victory/article_fef726ac-f755-11ec-8908-7f5d8d7b0b8b.html |url-status=live |access-date=June 29, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220629091636/https://norfolkdailynews.com/news/live-updates-friends-we-did-it-as-flood-appears-headed-to-victory/article_fef726ac-f755-11ec-8908-7f5d8d7b0b8b.html |archive-date=June 29, 2022}}{{Cite news |last1=Schulte |first1=Grant |last2=Melley |first2=Brian |date=June 29, 2022 |title=Nebraska GOP state Sen. Flood wins ex-congressman's seat |work=WFMZ-TV |agency=Associated Press |url=https://www.wfmz.com/news/race-tight-to-replace-ex-congressman-in-nebraska-district/article_13da8c15-c3a7-501e-9ab6-be3f7bad469c.html |url-status=live |access-date=June 29, 2022 |archive-url=https://archive.today/20220629091939/https://www.wfmz.com/news/race-tight-to-replace-ex-congressman-in-nebraska-district/article_13da8c15-c3a7-501e-9ab6-be3f7bad469c.html |archive-date=June 29, 2022}}

Flood won a full term in November 2022 in a rematch with Pansing Brooks.

Candidates

The Democratic and Republican nominees were selected by their respective party's executive committee on April 5 and April 9, respectively. Mike Flood defeated John Glen Weaver through the party's secret ballot 24 to Weaver's 5 votes.{{Cite news |last1=Cooper |first1=Keegan |last2=Kristianto |first2=Josh |date=April 10, 2022 |title=Mike Flood named Republican nominee for special election to fill 1st Congressional District vacancy |work=KETV |url=https://www.ketv.com/article/mike-flood-named-republican-nominee-for-special-election-to-fill-1st-congressional-district-vacancy/39681122 |url-status=live |access-date=April 12, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220410102128/https://www.ketv.com/article/mike-flood-named-republican-nominee-for-special-election-to-fill-1st-congressional-district-vacancy/39681122 |archive-date=April 10, 2022}}

= Nominees =

  • Patty Pansing Brooks (Democratic), state senator{{Cite news |date=March 26, 2022 |title=US Rep. Jeff Fortenberry of Nebraska announces resignation |work=WJXT |agency=Associated Press |url=https://www.news4jax.com/news/politics/2022/03/26/us-rep-jeff-fortenberry-of-nebraska-announces-resignation/ |url-status=live |access-date=March 27, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220327030145/https://www.news4jax.com/news/politics/2022/03/26/us-rep-jeff-fortenberry-of-nebraska-announces-resignation/ |archive-date=March 27, 2022 |quote=Flood and Pansing Brooks will both run in the special election to fill the seat..}}{{Cite news |date=April 5, 2022 |title=Democrats nominate Patty Pansing Brooks for special election to replace Fortenberry |work=Omaha World-Herald |url=https://omaha.com/news/state-and-regional/govt-and-politics/democrats-nominate-patty-pansing-brooks-for-special-election-to-replace-fortenberry/article_7666a154-b4e9-11ec-a0df-ab2120b1ee74.html |access-date=April 5, 2022 |quote=Lincoln Sen. Patty Pansing Brooks will vie to serve the rest of former Rep. Jeff Fortenberry's term in a June special election, after accepting the Democratic Party's nomination.}}
  • Mike Flood (Republican), state senator (2005{{ndash}}2013, 2021{{ndash}}2022), former speaker of the Nebraska Legislature (2007{{ndash}}2013), and candidate for governor in 2014{{cite news |title=Nebraska GOP picks Mike Flood as special election candidate |url=https://www.knopnews2.com/2022/04/09/nebraska-gop-picks-mike-flood-special-election-candidate/ |publisher=KNOP News 2 |date=April 9, 2022 |access-date=April 9, 2022}}

General election

= Endorsements =

{{Endorsements box

|title= Mike Flood (R)

|list=

;U.S. Senators

  • Deb Fischer, U.S. Senator from Nebraska (2013–present)

;U.S. Representatives

  • Don Bacon, U.S. Representative for {{ushr|NE|2}} (2017–present)
  • Tom Osborne, former U.S. Representative for Nebraska's 3rd congressional district (2001{{ndash}}2007){{cite web |last1=Kelly |first1=David |title=FLOOD PULLS IN OSBORNE ENDORSEMENT |url=http://waynedailynews.com/local-news/flood-pulls-in-osborne-endorsement/ |access-date=27 March 2022 |date=4 February 2022}}
  • Adrian Smith, U.S. Representative for {{ushr|NE|3}} (2007–present)

;State governors

  • Dave Heineman, 39th governor of Nebraska (2005{{ndash}}2015)
  • Pete Ricketts, 40th governor of Nebraska (2015{{ndash}}2023){{cite web |title=Pete Ricketts and Dave Heineman endorse Mike Flood for Congress |url=https://www.1011now.com/2022/01/21/pete-ricketts-dave-heineman-endorse-mike-flood-congress/ |website=www.1011now.com |publisher=KOLN |access-date=27 March 2022 |date=21 January 2022}}

;Organizations

}}

{{Endorsements box

| title = Patty Pansing Brooks (D)

| list =

;U.S. Senators

  • Bob Kerrey, former U.S. Senator from Nebraska (1989{{ndash}}2001) and 35th governor of Nebraska (1983{{ndash}}1987){{Cite web|url=https://www.kios.org/news/2022-04-01/pansing-brooks-endorsed-by-kerrey|title=Pansing Brooks Endorsed By Kerrey|website=KIOS-FM|date=April 1, 2022|access-date=May 24, 2022}}
  • Ben Nelson, former U.S. Senator from Nebraska (2001{{ndash}}2013) and 37th governor of Nebraska (1991{{ndash}}1999);{{cite web |title=Former U.S. Senator Ben Nelson endorses Patty Pansing Brooks for Congress |url=https://www.1011now.com/2022/04/21/former-us-senator-ben-nelson-endorses-patty-pansing-brooks-congress/ |website=www.1011now.com |date=April 21, 2022 |publisher=KOLN |access-date=22 April 2022}} U.S. Representatives

;U.S. Representatives

  • John Joseph Cavanaugh III, former U.S. Representative for Nebraska's 2nd congressional district (1977{{ndash}}1981){{cite web|url=https://www.1011now.com/2022/06/03/patty-pansing-brooks-announces-long-list-bipartisan-endorsements/|title=Patty Pansing Brooks announces long list of bipartisan endorsements|date=June 4, 2022|access-date=September 6, 2022|website=KOLN}}

;State officials

;State legislators

;Municipal officials

  • Leirion Gaylor Baird, incumbent mayor of Lincoln (2019{{ndash}}present){{Cite web|url=https://www.klkntv.com/lincoln-mayor-gaylor-baird-endorses-sen-pansing-brooks-for-congress/|title=Lincoln Mayor Gaylor Baird endorses Sen. Pansing Brooks for Congress|last=Dorn|first=Nolan|work=KLKN-TV|date=March 9, 2022|accessdate=April 18, 2022}}
  • Tanya Cook, member of Metropolitan Utilities District Board of Directors Subdivision 5 (2020–present) and former state senator (2009–2017)
  • Jane Raybould, Lincoln City Councilwoman, former Lancaster County Commissioner and nominee for lieutenant governor in 2014 and governor in 2018
  • Don Wesely, former mayor of Lincoln (1999–2003)

;Individuals

;Labor unions

  • Nebraska State AFL–CIO{{Cite web|url=https://ne.aflcio.org/labor-elections-2022-0|title = LABOR: Elections 2022|date = April 5, 2022}}
  • Nebraska State Education Association{{Cite web|url=https://journalstar.com/news/state-and-regional/govt-and-politics/state-teachers-union-endorses-primary-election-candidates/article_a55f3f91-7865-5e06-a7a1-fe6aaf744ecb.html|title = State teachers union endorses primary election candidates| date=April 7, 2022 }}

;Organizations

  • Planned Parenthood Action Fund{{cite web|last=Dorn|first=Nolan|url=https://www.klkntv.com/planned-parenthood-endorses-patty-pansing-brooks-tony-vargas-for-congress/|title=Planned Parenthood endorses Patty Pansing Brooks, Tony Vargas for Congress|work=KLKN|date=June 13, 2022|accessdate=June 13, 2022}}
  • Sierra Club Nebraska chapter{{cite web|url=https://www.sierraclub.org/nebraska/political/political-endorsements|title=Political Endorsements|website=Sierra Club Nebraska Chapter|date=January 2017}}

|colwidth=30em

}}

=Predictions=

class="wikitable" style="text-align:center"

!Source

!Ranking

!As of

align=left | The Cook Political Report{{Cite news| url=https://www.cookpolitical.com/analysis/house/2022-primaries/may-10-primary-preview-house-races-watch |title=May 10 Primary Preview: House Races to Watch |author=Dave Wasserman |date=April 29, 2022 |access-date=May 3, 2022 }}

|{{USRaceRating|Solid|R}}

| April 29, 2022

align="left" | Sabato's Crystal Ball{{cite web|last=Kondik|first=Kyle|title=Notes on the State of Politics: March 30, 2022|url=https://centerforpolitics.org/crystalball/articles/notes-on-the-state-of-politics-march-30-2022/|date=March 30, 2022|access-date=March 30, 2022}}

|{{USRaceRating|Safe|R}}

| March 30, 2022

align="left" |Politico{{Cite web |url=https://www.politico.com/2022-election/race-forecasts-ratings-and-predictions/house/ |title=2022 Election Forecast|date=April 5, 2022|publisher=Politico}}

|{{USRaceRating|Solid|R}}

|April 5, 2022

align="left" |RCP{{cite web |url= https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2022/house/elections-map.html|title=Battle for the House 2022|date=June 9, 2022 |publisher=RCP}}

|{{USRaceRating|Safe|R}}

|June 9, 2022

= Fundraising =

class="wikitable"
colspan="4"| Campaign finance reports
style="text-align:center;"

! Candidate

! Amount raised

! Amount spent

! Cash on hand

{{party shading/Republican}}| Mike Flood (R)

| $1,382,863

| $1,383,509

| $1,090

{{party shading/Democratic}}| Patty Pansing Brooks (D)

| $1,040,022

| $686,027

| $353,996

colspan="4"| Source: OpenSecrets{{Cite web |title=Nebraska District 01 2022 Special Election |url=https://www.opensecrets.org/races/special-elections-summary?cycle=2022&id=NE01 |access-date=August 15, 2022 |website=OpenSecrets |url-status=live |archive-url=https://archive.today/20220815112830/https://www.opensecrets.org/races/special-elections-summary?cycle=2022&id=NE01 |archive-date=August 15, 2022 |language=en}}

=Results=

Pansing Brooks's vote share was boosted by a higher-than-expected turnout in Lancaster County, home to state capital Lincoln, where she served as state senator, with the second-highest turnout of all counties.{{Cite web |title=Nebraska Secretary of State - Voter Turnout |url=https://electionresults.nebraska.gov/resultsVoterTurnout.aspx |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220629093422/https://electionresults.nebraska.gov/resultsVoterTurnout.aspx |archive-date=June 29, 2022 |access-date=June 29, 2022 |website=electionresults.nebraska.gov}} She also came within a five-point margin of winning the suburban Omaha county of Sarpy. Meanwhile, Flood's victory was the result of him winning more rural counties in the district.{{Cite web |title=Nebraska Secretary of State - Election Night Results |url=https://electionresults.nebraska.gov/resultsCTY.aspx?type=CG&rid=11507&osn=103 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220629093454/https://electionresults.nebraska.gov/resultsCTY.aspx?type=CG&rid=11507&osn=103 |archive-date=June 29, 2022 |access-date=June 29, 2022 |website=electionresults.nebraska.gov}} Pansing Brooks's outperformance of Biden in the district, in spite of being outspent by Flood, prompted some Democratic strategists to paint the results as a moral victory in a "post-Roe" era.{{Cite news |last=Donnini |first=Zachary |date=June 29, 2022 |title=DDHQ Election Day Spotlight: Good Day for MAGA in IL, but Underwhelming Performance in NE-01 Mars Night for GOP |work=Decision Desk HQ |url=https://decisiondeskhq.com/ddhq-election-day-spotlight-a-good-day-for-maga-in-illinois-but-an-underwhelming-performance-in-ne-01-marred-the-night-for-the-gop/ |url-status=live |access-date=June 30, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220630034244/https://decisiondeskhq.com/ddhq-election-day-spotlight-a-good-day-for-maga-in-illinois-but-an-underwhelming-performance-in-ne-01-marred-the-night-for-the-gop/ |archive-date=June 30, 2022}} In reaction to the results, Flood acknowledged the need for him to increase his support in the Lincoln area and suburban Omaha.{{Election box begin|title=2022 Nebraska's 1st congressional district special election}}

{{Election box winning candidate with party link

|candidate = Mike Flood

|party = Republican Party (United States)

|votes = 61,017

|percentage = 52.69

|change = -6.83

}}

{{Election box candidate with party link

|candidate = Patty Pansing Brooks

|party = Democratic Party (United States)

|votes = 54,783

|percentage = 47.31

|change = +9.64

}}

{{Election box total

|votes= 115,800

|percentage= 100.00

}}

{{Election box hold with party link no swing

| winner = Republican Party (United States)

}}

{{Election box end}}

{{collapse top|1=By county|left=yes|bg=#B0CEFF;line-height:135%;|border=none}}

class="wikitable sortable" style="text-align:right;font-size:90%;line-height:1.3"

! rowspan="2" |County

! colspan="2" |Mike Flood
Republican

! colspan="2" |Patty Pansing Brooks
Democratic

! colspan="2" |Margin

! rowspan="2" |Total
votes

! rowspan="2" |Turnout

data-sort-type="number" |#

! data-sort-type="number" |%

! data-sort-type="number" |#

! data-sort-type="number" |%

! data-sort-type="number" |#

! data-sort-type="number" |%

{{party shading/Republican}} |Butler

| {{party shading/Republican}} |1,185

| {{party shading/Republican}} |82.12

| {{party shading/Democratic}} |258

| {{party shading/Democratic}} |17.88

| {{party shading/Republican}} |927

| {{party shading/Republican}} |64.24

| {{party shading/Republican}} |1,443

| 25.63

{{party shading/Republican}} |Cass

| {{party shading/Republican}} |2,753

| {{party shading/Republican}} |64.44

| {{party shading/Democratic}} |1,519

| {{party shading/Democratic}} |35.56

| {{party shading/Republican}} |1,234

| {{party shading/Republican}} |28.89

| {{party shading/Republican}} |4,272

| 22.52

{{party shading/Republican}} |Colfax

| {{party shading/Republican}} |847

| {{party shading/Republican}} |85.30

| {{party shading/Democratic}} |146

| {{party shading/Democratic}} |14.70

| {{party shading/Republican}} |701

| {{party shading/Republican}} |70.60

| {{party shading/Republican}} |993

| 18.93

{{party shading/Republican}} |Cuming

| {{party shading/Republican}} |1,164

| {{party shading/Republican}} |83.62

| {{party shading/Democratic}} |228

| {{party shading/Democratic}} |16.38

| {{party shading/Republican}} |936

| {{party shading/Republican}} |67.24

| {{party shading/Republican}} |1,392

| 23.91

{{party shading/Republican}} |Dodge

| {{party shading/Republican}} |3,440

| {{party shading/Republican}} |64.63

| {{party shading/Democratic}} |1,883

| {{party shading/Democratic}} |35.37

| {{party shading/Republican}} |1,557

| {{party shading/Republican}} |29.25

| {{party shading/Republican}} |5,323

| 24.17

{{party shading/Democratic}} |Lancaster

| {{party shading/Republican}} |31,054

| {{party shading/Republican}} |43.04

| {{party shading/Democratic}} |41,104

| {{party shading/Democratic}} |56.96

| {{party shading/Democratic}} |10,050

| {{party shading/Democratic}} |13.93

| {{party shading/Democratic}} |72,158

| 36.09

{{party shading/Republican}} |Madison

| {{party shading/Republican}} |4,759

| {{party shading/Republican}} |84.36

| {{party shading/Democratic}} |882

| {{party shading/Democratic}} |15.64

| {{party shading/Republican}} |3,877

| {{party shading/Republican}} |68.73

| {{party shading/Republican}} |5,641

| 25.79

{{party shading/Republican}} |Platte

| {{party shading/Republican}} |4,379

| {{party shading/Republican}} |83.52

| {{party shading/Democratic}} |864

| {{party shading/Democratic}} |16.48

| {{party shading/Republican}} |3,515

| {{party shading/Republican}} |67.04

| {{party shading/Republican}} |5,243

| 25.59

{{party shading/Republican}} |Polk

| {{party shading/Republican}} |387

| {{party shading/Republican}} |82.52

| {{party shading/Democratic}} |82

| {{party shading/Democratic}} |17.48

| {{party shading/Republican}} |305

| {{party shading/Republican}} |65.04

| {{party shading/Republican}} |469

| 27.41

{{party shading/Republican}} |Sarpy {{small|(part)}}

| {{party shading/Republican}} |7,483

| {{party shading/Republican}} |52.65

| {{party shading/Democratic}} |6,729

| {{party shading/Democratic}} |47.35

| {{party shading/Republican}} |754

| {{party shading/Republican}} |5.31

| {{party shading/Republican}} |14,212

| 15.75

{{party shading/Republican}} |Seward

| {{party shading/Republican}} |1,946

| {{party shading/Republican}} |69.06

| {{party shading/Democratic}} |872

| {{party shading/Democratic}} |30.94

| {{party shading/Republican}} |1,074

| {{party shading/Republican}} |38.02

| {{party shading/Republican}} |2,818

| 24.70

{{party shading/Republican}} |Stanton

| {{party shading/Republican}} |1,620

| {{party shading/Republican}} |88.24

| {{party shading/Democratic}} |216

| {{party shading/Democratic}} |11.76

| {{party shading/Republican}} |1,404

| {{party shading/Republican}} |76.48

| {{party shading/Republican}} |1,836

| 48.46

class="sortbottom"

! Totals

| 61,017

| 52.69

| 54,783

| 47.31

| 6,234

| 5.38

| 115,800

| 28.44

{{collapse bottom}}

See also

References