Advanced Concept Technology Demonstration

{{Short description|Type of testing program by the United States military}}

{{Use American English|date=May 2025}}

{{Infobox military unit

| unit_name = Advanced Concept Technology Demonstration program

| dates = 1994–2006 (or FY95–FY07){{efn|FY07 ACTD planning had happened two years in advance, from candidacy in Dec. 2005 to Sept 2006 approval, in time for activation just before FY07 (i.e. Oct. 2006 to Sept 2007).}}

| country =

| branch = Used by United States Army, Marine Corps, Navy, and Air Force

| type = Defense acquisition program

| role = Reduce time to field improved technology, incorporate user into development process

}}

The Advanced Concept Technology Demonstration (ACTD) program was a Department of Defense research and evaluation initiative for mature, advanced technology for United States military usage. These demonstrations allowed for cheaper and earlier evaluation of technology and systems than the formal acquisition process.{{Cite web |last= |first= |last2= |first2= |date=September 1998 |title=The Department Of Defense's Advanced Concept Technology Demonstrations |url=https://www.cbo.gov/sites/default/files/105th-congress-1997-1998/reports/actd.pdf |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161128073617/https://www.cbo.gov/sites/default/files/105th-congress-1997-1998/reports/actd.pdf |archive-date=28 November 2016 |access-date=16 May 2025 |website= |publisher=Congressional Budget Office, Washington, DC}}

An ACTD must be sponsored by an operational user, with approval and oversight from the now-terminated role of Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Advanced Systems and Concepts, or DUSD(AS&C), previously titled the Deputy USD for Advanced Technology, or DUSD(AT).{{Cite web |date=February 2008 |title=OSD RDT&E Budget item justification (R2 Exhibit) |url=https://apps.dtic.mil/descriptivesum/Y2009/OSD/0603648D8Z.pdf |url-status=unfit |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20250526042032/https://apps.dtic.mil/descriptivesum/Y2009/OSD/0603648D8Z.pdf |archive-date=26 May 2025 |access-date=26 May 2025 |website=apps.dtic.mil (Defense Technical Information Center = DTIC) |pages=1 |quote=It is anticipated that all ongoing ACTDs will be complete by FY09.}}

The follow-on Joint Capability Technology Demonstration (JCTD) program was initiated by the deputy under-secretary in 2005. The new JCTD framework emphasized multiservice technology development and improvements in planning. ACTDs were replaced by JCTDs during about a three year span from 2005 to 2008. During 2006, the final round of ACTDs were up for selection, and in September 2006 the winning projects received their formal approval.{{Cite web |last=Peterson |first=Mark |date=18 April 2006 |title=Microsoft PowerPoint - Peterson NDIA ACTD Brief April 2006-Public.ppt |url=https://ndia.dtic.mil/wp-content/uploads/2006/science/peterson.pdf |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20241205121339/https://ndia.dtic.mil/wp-content/uploads/2006/science/peterson.pdf |archive-date=5 December 2024 |access-date=26 May 2025 |website=ndia.dtic.mil (National Defense Industrial Association = NDIA {{!}} Defense Technical Information Center = DTIC) |publisher=Director, Program Resources & Integration, Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD), DDR&E/AS&C (Advanced Systems & Concepts) |pages=7, 9 |quote=JCTD First introduced in the FY 2006 President’s Budget"; "FY07 ACTD Candidates Submitted [in] Dec [2005] (__Note__): FY08 programs are referred to as ACTDs instead of JCTDs due to pending nature of the JCTD program, circa April 2006. Presumably once approved, it would have been updated to match. (__Editor Note__)}} All remaining ACTDs continued to be funded, though, and were expected to conclude by 2008.

Lists of selected programs

The following lists of ACTDs are separated into which year they were selected and approved during.

= Fiscal year 1995 =

class="wikitable sortable mw-collapsible"

|+ACTDs Selected in Fiscal Year 1995

!Fiscal Year

!#

!Title

!Class*

!Total Expected Cost

(1995–2003: mil, K)

!User/Sponsor

!Lead Service or Agency

rowspan="12" |Oct. 1994

(FY 1995)

|1

|Advanced Joint

Planning

|I

|40.5m{{efn|Includes $5.2 million added from fiscal year 1996 funds, i.e. the next year.}}

|US Atlantic

Command

|Defense Information

Systems Agency

2

|Cruise Missile

Defense, Phase I

|III

|74.2m

|US Pacific

Command

|Navy

3

|High-Altitude

Endurance UAV

|II

|922.6m

|US Atlantic

Command

|Air Force

4

|Joint Countermine

|III

|402.1m

|US Atlantic

Command

|Navy

5

|Kinetic Energy Boost-

Phase Intercept

|II

|40.0m

|Air Combat

Command

|Air Force

6

|Low-Life-Cycle-Cost

Medium-Lift

Helicopter

|II

|800K

|Military Sealift

Command

|Navy

7

|Medium-Altitude

Endurance UAV

(Predator)

|II

|128.4m

|US Atlantic

Command

|Air Force

8

|Precision/Rapid

Counter-MRL

|III

|86.3m

|US Forces Korea

|Army

9

|Precision SIGINT

Targeting System

|I

|45.4m

|US Forces Korea

|Navy

10

|Rapid Force

Projection Initiative

|III

|567.8m

|XVIIIth Airborne

Corps

|Army

11

|Synthetic Theater

of War

|I

|174.2m{{efn|Excludes an additional $4.6 million to be provided by the United Kingdom.}}

|US Atlantic

Command

|None

| colspan="5" |*Class I = software development projects; class II = traditional platforms; class III = systems-of-systems

Abbreviations:

= Fiscal year 1996 =

class="wikitable sortable mw-collapsible"

|+ACTDs Selected in Fiscal Year 1996

!Fiscal Year

!#

!Title

!Class*

!Total Expected Cost

(1995–2003: mil, K)

!User/Sponsor

!Lead Service or Agency

rowspan="13" |Oct. 1995

(FY 1996)

|1

|Air Base/Port

Biological Detection

|III

|19.7m

|US Central

Command,

US Pacific

Command

|Army

2

|Battlefield Awareness

and Data Dissemination

|I

|113.4m

|US Atlantic

Command

|Defense Information

Systems Agency

3

|Combat Identification

|II

|92.7m

|US Atlantic

Command

|Army

4

|Combat Vehicle

Survivability

|II

|48.6m

|III Corps

|Army

5

|Counterproliferation I

|III

|123.3m

|US European

Command

|Air Force, Defense Special

Weapons Agency (DSWA)

6

|Counter Sniper

|II

|1.0m

|US Army

Infantry School

|Army

7

|Joint Logistics

|I

|168.3m

|US Atlantic

Command,

US European

Command

|Navy

8

|Miniature Air-launched

Decoy

|II

|45.0m

|Air Combat

Command

|Air Force

9

|Navigation Warfare

|II

|83.4m

|US Atlantic

Command

|Air Force

10

|Semi-Automated

IMINT Processing

|I

|123.2m

|US Atlantic

Command

|Army, Air Force, DARPA,

National Imagery and

Mapping Agency (NIMA)

11

|Tactical High-Energy

Laser

|II

|117.1m{{efn|Excludes an additional $64.7 million to be provided by Israel.}}

|Israeli Ministry

of Defense

|Israel

12

|Tactical UAV program

|II

|131.3m

|Army, Navy,

Marine Corps

|Army

| colspan="5" |*Class I = software development projects; class II = traditional platforms; class III = systems-of-systems

Abbreviations:

= Fiscal year 1997 =

class="wikitable sortable mw-collapsible"

|+ACTDs Selected in Fiscal Year 1997

!Fiscal Year

!#

!Title

!Class*

!Total Expected Cost

(1995–2003: mil, K)

!User/Sponsor

!Lead Service or Agency

rowspan="10" |Oct. 1996

(FY 1997)

|1

|Chemical Add-On to

Air Base/Port

Biological Detection

|III

|3.2m

|US Central

Command,

US Pacific

Command

|Army

2

|Consequence

Management

|II

|3.2m

|Army, Marine

Corps

|Army, Marine Corps

3

|Counter-

proliferation II

|III

|303.0m

|US European

Command

|Air Force, Navy

4

|Extending the Littoral

Battlespace

|III

|137.7m

|US Pacific

Command

|Marine Corps

5

|Information

Operations Planning

Tool

|I

|55.1m

|US Central

Command

|Air Force

6

|Integrated Collection

Management

|I

|12.2m

|US Atlantic

Command

|Defense Intelligence

Agency (DIA)

7

|Joint Advanced Health

and Usage Monitoring

System

|II

|15.5m

|n.a.

|Navy

8

|Military Operations in

Urban Terrain

|III

|71.9m

|US Special

Operations

Command

(USSOCOM)

|Army

9

|Rapid Terrain

Visualization

|II

|54.6m

|XVIIIth Airborne

Corps

|Army

| colspan="5" |*Class I = software development projects; class II = traditional platforms; class III = systems-of-systems

Abbreviations:

= Fiscal year 1998 =

class="wikitable sortable mw-collapsible"

|+ACTDs Selected in Fiscal Year 1998

!Fiscal Year

!#

!Title

!Class*

!Total Expected Cost

(1995–2003: mil, K)

!User/Sponsor

!Lead Service or Agency

rowspan="15" |Oct. 1997

(FY 1998)

|1

|Adaptive Course of

Action

|I

|19.3m

|US Atlantic

Command,

US Pacific

Command

|Defense Information

Systems Agency

2

|C4I for Coalition

Warfare

|I

|20.0m

|US European

Command

|Army

3

|High Power

Microwave

|II

|2.0m

|US European

Command

|Army

4

|Information Assur-

ance: Automated

Intrusion Detection

Environment

|I

|75.1m

|US Strategic

Command

|Defense Information

Systems Agency

5

|Joint Biological

Remote Early

Warning System

|III

|125.7m

|US European

Command

|Army

6

|Joint Continuous

Strike Environment

|I

|15.9m

|US European

Command

|Defense Information

Systems Agency

7

|Joint Modular Lighter

System

|II

|26.5m

|US Atlantic

Command

|Navy

8

|Line-of-Sight Anti-

tank

|II

|257.9m

|US Central

Command

|Army

9

|Link 16 (tactical data

network for NATO)

|I

|3.3m

|US Atlantic

Command

|Navy

10

|Migration Defense

Intelligence Threat

Data System

|I

|11.4m

|US European

Command

|Defense Intelligence

Agency (DIA)

11

|Precision Targeting

Identification

|II

|23.0m{{efn|Excludes an additional $2.4 million to be provided by the United Kingdom.}}

|JIATF East

(Joint Inter-

agency Task

Force East)

|Navy

12

|Space-Based

Space Surveillance

Operations

|I

|21.5m

|US Space

Command

|Air Force

13

|Theater Precision

Strike Operations

|I

|93.4m

|US Forces Korea

|Army

14

|Unattended Ground

Sensors

|II

|20.8m

|US Central

Command,

US Special

Operations

Command

(USSOCOM)

|Air Force

| colspan="5" |*Class I = software development projects; class II = traditional platforms; class III = systems-of-systems

Abbreviations:

Although not represented in this section, additional ACTDs indeed followed those listed above (during FY 1999–2006).{{Cite web |date=July 2009 |title=[FY 1995 to FY 2009] Joint Capability Technology Demonstrations (JCTD) {{!}} JCTD website |url=http://www.acq.osd.mil/jctd/descript.htm |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090725091706/http://www.acq.osd.mil/jctd/descript.htm |archive-date=25 July 2009 |access-date=26 May 2025 |website=acq.osd.mil (Acqusition, Office of Secretary of Defense = OSD)}}

Congressional Budget Office assessments

Some of the Congressional Budget Office assessments, such as the CBO 1998 Memorandum, reviewed the ACTD program's progress since its initiation in 1994 up until the 1998 assessment. The memorandum summarized the results as "From 1995 through 1998, DoD has spent $3.2 billion on 46 ACTDs. The $3.2 billion represents about 2 percent of DoD’s entire budget for research and development during that time." The memorandum provided some details about the 46 ACTDs as of 1998, and highlighted the Medium-Altitude Endurance UAV (the Predator drone) as on its then successes, having transitioned into a formal DOD Acquisition Program.

Outcomes

The following programs were completed under the Advanced Concept Technology Demonstration framework:

  • Global Hawk{{cite web |last1=Drezner |first1=Jeffrey A. |last2=Leonard |first2=Robert S. |date=January 2002 |title=Innovative Development: Global Hawk and DarkStar: Their Advanced Concept Technology Demonstrator Program Experience, Executive Summary |url=http://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR1473.html |accessdate=2 May 2012 |publisher=RAND}}
  • JSTOW ACTD as part of Joint Semi-Automated Forces
  • DarkStar
  • JPADS{{cite web |author=Benney, Richard |display-authors=etal |title=The Joint Precision Airdrop System Advanced Concept Technology Demonstration |url=http://faculty.nps.edu/oayakime/ADSC/PATCAD%20-%20Benney%20-%20The%20Joint%20Precision%20Airdrop%20System%20Advanced%20Concept%20Technology%20Demonstration.pdf |accessdate=1 May 2012 |website=www.aiaa.org |publisher=American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics}}

See also

Notes

References

{{Reflist}}

Further reading

  • {{cite web |url=http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/army/docs/astmp/c1/P1E1.htm |title=Army Science and Technology Master Plan: (section 1): Advanced Concept Technology Demonstration (ACTD) |publisher=Federation of American Scientists |website=www.fas.org |date=21 March 1997 |accessdate=2 May 2012}}
  • {{cite web |url=https://vtol.org/store/templates/product/createPreview.cfm |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170623160112/https://vtol.org/store/templates/product/createPreview.cfm |url-status=dead |archive-date=23 June 2017 |title=Joint Advanced Health and Usage Monitoring System (JAHUMS) Advanced Concept Technology Demonstration (ACTD) |publisher=American Helicopter Society International |website=vtol.org |date=2000 |accessdate=2 May 2012 |author=Haas, David J. |display-authors=etal}}