Advanced Concept Technology Demonstration
{{Short description|Type of testing program by the United States military}}
{{Use American English|date=May 2025}}
{{Infobox military unit
| unit_name = Advanced Concept Technology Demonstration program
| dates = 1994–2006 (or FY95–FY07){{efn|FY07 ACTD planning had happened two years in advance, from candidacy in Dec. 2005 to Sept 2006 approval, in time for activation just before FY07 (i.e. Oct. 2006 to Sept 2007).}}
| country =
| branch = Used by United States Army, Marine Corps, Navy, and Air Force
| type = Defense acquisition program
| role = Reduce time to field improved technology, incorporate user into development process
}}
The Advanced Concept Technology Demonstration (ACTD) program was a Department of Defense research and evaluation initiative for mature, advanced technology for United States military usage. These demonstrations allowed for cheaper and earlier evaluation of technology and systems than the formal acquisition process.{{Cite web |last= |first= |last2= |first2= |date=September 1998 |title=The Department Of Defense's Advanced Concept Technology Demonstrations |url=https://www.cbo.gov/sites/default/files/105th-congress-1997-1998/reports/actd.pdf |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161128073617/https://www.cbo.gov/sites/default/files/105th-congress-1997-1998/reports/actd.pdf |archive-date=28 November 2016 |access-date=16 May 2025 |website= |publisher=Congressional Budget Office, Washington, DC}}
An ACTD must be sponsored by an operational user, with approval and oversight from the now-terminated role of Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Advanced Systems and Concepts, or DUSD(AS&C), previously titled the Deputy USD for Advanced Technology, or DUSD(AT).{{Cite web |date=February 2008 |title=OSD RDT&E Budget item justification (R2 Exhibit) |url=https://apps.dtic.mil/descriptivesum/Y2009/OSD/0603648D8Z.pdf |url-status=unfit |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20250526042032/https://apps.dtic.mil/descriptivesum/Y2009/OSD/0603648D8Z.pdf |archive-date=26 May 2025 |access-date=26 May 2025 |website=apps.dtic.mil (Defense Technical Information Center = DTIC) |pages=1 |quote=It is anticipated that all ongoing ACTDs will be complete by FY09.}}
The follow-on Joint Capability Technology Demonstration (JCTD) program was initiated by the deputy under-secretary in 2005. The new JCTD framework emphasized multiservice technology development and improvements in planning. ACTDs were replaced by JCTDs during about a three year span from 2005 to 2008. During 2006, the final round of ACTDs were up for selection, and in September 2006 the winning projects received their formal approval.{{Cite web |last=Peterson |first=Mark |date=18 April 2006 |title=Microsoft PowerPoint - Peterson NDIA ACTD Brief April 2006-Public.ppt |url=https://ndia.dtic.mil/wp-content/uploads/2006/science/peterson.pdf |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20241205121339/https://ndia.dtic.mil/wp-content/uploads/2006/science/peterson.pdf |archive-date=5 December 2024 |access-date=26 May 2025 |website=ndia.dtic.mil (National Defense Industrial Association = NDIA {{!}} Defense Technical Information Center = DTIC) |publisher=Director, Program Resources & Integration, Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD), DDR&E/AS&C (Advanced Systems & Concepts) |pages=7, 9 |quote=JCTD First introduced in the FY 2006 President’s Budget"; "FY07 ACTD Candidates Submitted [in] Dec [2005] (__Note__): FY08 programs are referred to as ACTDs instead of JCTDs due to pending nature of the JCTD program, circa April 2006. Presumably once approved, it would have been updated to match. (__Editor Note__)}} All remaining ACTDs continued to be funded, though, and were expected to conclude by 2008.
Lists of selected programs
The following lists of ACTDs are separated into which year they were selected and approved during.
= Fiscal year 1995 =
class="wikitable sortable mw-collapsible"
|+ACTDs Selected in Fiscal Year 1995 !# !Title !Class* !Total Expected Cost (1995–2003: mil, K) !User/Sponsor !Lead Service or Agency |
rowspan="12" |Oct. 1994
(FY 1995) |1 |Advanced Joint Planning |I |40.5m{{efn|Includes $5.2 million added from fiscal year 1996 funds, i.e. the next year.}} |
2
|Cruise Missile Defense, Phase I |III |74.2m |Navy |
3
|High-Altitude Endurance UAV |II |922.6m |
4
|Joint Countermine |III |402.1m |Navy |
5
|Kinetic Energy Boost- Phase Intercept |II |40.0m |
6
|Low-Life-Cycle-Cost Medium-Lift Helicopter |II |800K |Navy |
7
|Medium-Altitude Endurance UAV (Predator) |II |128.4m |
8
|Precision/Rapid Counter-MRL |III |86.3m |Army |
9
|Precision SIGINT Targeting System |I |45.4m |Navy |
10
|Rapid Force Projection Initiative |III |567.8m |Army |
11
|Synthetic Theater of War |I |174.2m{{efn|Excludes an additional $4.6 million to be provided by the United Kingdom.}} |None |
| colspan="5" |*Class I = software development projects; class II = traditional platforms; class III = systems-of-systems
Abbreviations:
|
= Fiscal year 1996 =
class="wikitable sortable mw-collapsible"
|+ACTDs Selected in Fiscal Year 1996 !# !Title !Class* !Total Expected Cost (1995–2003: mil, K) !User/Sponsor !Lead Service or Agency |
rowspan="13" |Oct. 1995
(FY 1996) |1 |Air Base/Port Biological Detection |III |19.7m |Army |
2
|Battlefield Awareness and Data Dissemination |I |113.4m |
3
|Combat Identification |II |92.7m |Army |
4
|Combat Vehicle Survivability |II |48.6m |Army |
5
|Counterproliferation I |III |123.3m |
6
|Counter Sniper |II |1.0m |Army |
7
|Joint Logistics |I |168.3m |Navy |
8
|Miniature Air-launched Decoy |II |45.0m |
9
|Navigation Warfare |II |83.4m |
10
|Semi-Automated IMINT Processing |I |123.2m |
11
|II |117.1m{{efn|Excludes an additional $64.7 million to be provided by Israel.}} |
12
|Tactical UAV program |II |131.3m |Army |
| colspan="5" |*Class I = software development projects; class II = traditional platforms; class III = systems-of-systems
Abbreviations:
|
= Fiscal year 1997 =
class="wikitable sortable mw-collapsible"
|+ACTDs Selected in Fiscal Year 1997 !# !Title !Class* !Total Expected Cost (1995–2003: mil, K) !User/Sponsor !Lead Service or Agency |
rowspan="10" |Oct. 1996
(FY 1997) |1 |Chemical Add-On to Air Base/Port Biological Detection |III |3.2m |Army |
2
|Consequence Management |II |3.2m |
3
|Counter- proliferation II |III |303.0m |
4
|Extending the Littoral Battlespace |III |137.7m |
5
|Information Operations Planning Tool |I |55.1m |
6
|Integrated Collection Management |I |12.2m |
7
|Joint Advanced Health and Usage Monitoring System |II |15.5m |n.a. |Navy |
8
|III |71.9m |Army |
9
|Rapid Terrain Visualization |II |54.6m |Army |
| colspan="5" |*Class I = software development projects; class II = traditional platforms; class III = systems-of-systems
Abbreviations:
|
= Fiscal year 1998 =
class="wikitable sortable mw-collapsible"
|+ACTDs Selected in Fiscal Year 1998 !# !Title !Class* !Total Expected Cost (1995–2003: mil, K) !User/Sponsor !Lead Service or Agency |
rowspan="15" |Oct. 1997
(FY 1998) |1 |Adaptive Course of Action |I |19.3m |
2
|C4I for Coalition Warfare |I |20.0m |Army |
3
Microwave |II |2.0m |Army |
4
|Information Assur- ance: Automated Intrusion Detection Environment |I |75.1m |
5
|Joint Biological Remote Early Warning System |III |125.7m |Army |
6
|Joint Continuous Strike Environment |I |15.9m |
7
|Joint Modular Lighter System |II |26.5m |Navy |
8
|Line-of-Sight Anti- tank |II |257.9m |Army |
9
|Link 16 (tactical data network for NATO) |I |3.3m |Navy |
10
|Migration Defense Intelligence Threat Data System |I |11.4m |
11
|Precision Targeting Identification |II |23.0m{{efn|Excludes an additional $2.4 million to be provided by the United Kingdom.}} (Joint Inter- agency Task Force East) |Navy |
12
|Space-Based Space Surveillance Operations |I |21.5m |
13
|Theater Precision Strike Operations |I |93.4m |Army |
14
|Unattended Ground Sensors |II |20.8m |
| colspan="5" |*Class I = software development projects; class II = traditional platforms; class III = systems-of-systems
Abbreviations: |
Although not represented in this section, additional ACTDs indeed followed those listed above (during FY 1999–2006).{{Cite web |date=July 2009 |title=[FY 1995 to FY 2009] Joint Capability Technology Demonstrations (JCTD) {{!}} JCTD website |url=http://www.acq.osd.mil/jctd/descript.htm |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090725091706/http://www.acq.osd.mil/jctd/descript.htm |archive-date=25 July 2009 |access-date=26 May 2025 |website=acq.osd.mil (Acqusition, Office of Secretary of Defense = OSD)}}
Congressional Budget Office assessments
Some of the Congressional Budget Office assessments, such as the CBO 1998 Memorandum, reviewed the ACTD program's progress since its initiation in 1994 up until the 1998 assessment. The memorandum summarized the results as "From 1995 through 1998, DoD has spent $3.2 billion on 46 ACTDs. The $3.2 billion represents about 2 percent of DoD’s entire budget for research and development during that time." The memorandum provided some details about the 46 ACTDs as of 1998, and highlighted the Medium-Altitude Endurance UAV (the Predator drone) as on its then successes, having transitioned into a formal DOD Acquisition Program.
Outcomes
The following programs were completed under the Advanced Concept Technology Demonstration framework:
- Global Hawk{{cite web |last1=Drezner |first1=Jeffrey A. |last2=Leonard |first2=Robert S. |date=January 2002 |title=Innovative Development: Global Hawk and DarkStar: Their Advanced Concept Technology Demonstrator Program Experience, Executive Summary |url=http://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR1473.html |accessdate=2 May 2012 |publisher=RAND}}
- JSTOW ACTD as part of Joint Semi-Automated Forces
- DarkStar
- JPADS{{cite web |author=Benney, Richard |display-authors=etal |title=The Joint Precision Airdrop System Advanced Concept Technology Demonstration |url=http://faculty.nps.edu/oayakime/ADSC/PATCAD%20-%20Benney%20-%20The%20Joint%20Precision%20Airdrop%20System%20Advanced%20Concept%20Technology%20Demonstration.pdf |accessdate=1 May 2012 |website=www.aiaa.org |publisher=American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics}}
See also
- The Technical Cooperation Program (TTCP) – An international defense science and technology collaboration between Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the United Kingdom and the United States.
Notes
References
{{Reflist}}
Further reading
- {{cite web |url=http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/army/docs/astmp/c1/P1E1.htm |title=Army Science and Technology Master Plan: (section 1): Advanced Concept Technology Demonstration (ACTD) |publisher=Federation of American Scientists |website=www.fas.org |date=21 March 1997 |accessdate=2 May 2012}}
- {{cite web |url=https://vtol.org/store/templates/product/createPreview.cfm |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170623160112/https://vtol.org/store/templates/product/createPreview.cfm |url-status=dead |archive-date=23 June 2017 |title=Joint Advanced Health and Usage Monitoring System (JAHUMS) Advanced Concept Technology Demonstration (ACTD) |publisher=American Helicopter Society International |website=vtol.org |date=2000 |accessdate=2 May 2012 |author=Haas, David J. |display-authors=etal}}
External links
- {{cite web |title=Advanced Concept Technology Demonstrations (ACTD) Website |url=https://acc.dau.mil/CommunityBrowser.aspx?id=37609&lang=en-US |publisher=Defense Acquisitions University |url-status=dead |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20160303231029/https://acc.dau.mil/CommunityBrowser.aspx?id=37609&lang=en-US |archivedate=3 March 2016}}