Anti-Catholicism in the United States

{{Main article|Colonial history of the United States}}

{{Further|British colonization of the Americas|Religious discrimination in the United States}}

American anti-Catholicism originally derived from the theological heritage of the Protestant Reformation and the European wars of religion (16th–18th century). Because the Reformation was based on an effort to correct what was perceived as the errors and excesses of the Catholic Church, its proponents formed strong positions against the Roman clerical hierarchy in general and the Papacy in particular. These positions were held by most Protestant spokesmen in the Thirteen Colonies, including those from Calvinist, Anglican, and Lutheran traditions. Furthermore, English, Scottish, and Scots-Irish identity to a large extent was based on the opposition to Catholicism. "To be English was to be anti-Catholic", writes Robert Curran.Robert Emmett Curran, Papist Devils: Catholics in British America, 1574–1783 (2014), pp. 201-2.

Many of the English colonists who settled in North America during the 17th and 18th centuries, such as the Puritans and Congregationalists, had themselves fled Europe due to religious persecution by the Church of England, whose doctrines and modes of worship they believed to be firmly rooted in Roman Catholicism. Because of this, much of early American religious culture exhibited the more extreme anti-Catholic bias of these Protestant denominations. John Tracy Ellis wrote that a "universal anti-Catholic bias was brought to Jamestown in 1607 and vigorously cultivated in all the thirteen colonies from Massachusetts to Georgia."{{cite book |first=John Tracy |last=Ellis |title=American Catholicism |url=https://archive.org/details/americancatholic0000elli_n7j0 |url-access=registration |year=1956}} Colonial charters and laws contained specific proscriptions against Roman Catholics having any political power. Ellis noted that a common hatred of the Roman Catholic Church could bring together Anglican and Puritan clergy and laity despite their many other disagreements.

In 1642, the English colony of Virginia enacted a law prohibiting the entry of Catholic settlers. Five years later, a similar statute was enacted by the Massachusetts Bay Colony. In 1649, the Act of Toleration was passed in the Province of Maryland, where "blasphemy and the calling of opprobrious religious names" became punishable offenses, but it was repealed in 1654 and thus Catholics were outlawed once again. By 1692, formerly Catholic Maryland overthrew its government, established the Church of England by law, and forced Catholics to pay heavy taxes towards it. They were cut off from all participation in politics and additional laws were introduced that outlawed the Mass, the church's sacraments, and Catholic schools.

Following the passage of the Quebec Act granting Catholic emancipation and freedom of religion to Catholics in Quebec at the start of the American Revolutionary War, New Yorkers were angry about it, as they feared it would spread Catholicism around British North America, particularly in the Anglican colonies.{{cite book | first =Charles | last =Metzger | title =Catholics and the American Revolution: A Study in Religious Climate| publisher = Loyola University Press | year = 1961 |isbn=9781258177744 | page =31 }} The Act was termed one of the Intolerable Acts which sparked the American Revolution.{{cite book |last=Davis |first=Derek H. |title=Religion and the Continental Congress, 1774–1789: Contributions to Original Intent |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=9es9WWz8Ac8C&pg=PA153 |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=2000 |page=153 |isbn=9780195350883}} American Patriot organisations, as a result, designed the George Rex Flag as a symbol of protest against the act and Catholicism. After the Battle of Lexington, people such as Isaac Low made claims that the King had violated his oath by allowing Catholicism in Quebec.{{cite book | first =Jason | last =Duncan | title =Citizens Or Papists?: The Politics of Anti-Catholicism in New York, 1685–1821| publisher = Fordham University Press | year = 2005 | isbn =0823225127 | page =35}}

John Adams attended Vespers on a Sunday afternoon at a Catholic church in Philadelphia one day in 1774. He praised the sermon for teaching civic duty, and enjoyed the music, but ridiculed the rituals engaged in by the parishioners.{{cite book|title=The American Catholic Historical Researches|date=1898|volume=15|publisher=M.I.J. Griffin|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=lGLXAAAAMAAJ&pg=PA174|page=174|access-date=August 21, 2015}} In 1788, John Jay urged the New York Legislature to require office-holders to renounce the pope and foreign authorities "in all matters ecclesiastical as well as civil," which included both the Catholic and the Anglican churches.[https://www.archives.gov/nhprc/annotation/march-2002/religion-founding-fathers.html Annotation] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080327032730/http://www.archives.gov/nhprc/annotation/march-2002/religion-founding-fathers.html|date=March 27, 2008}}

Once the American Revolution was underway and independence was at hand, Virginia, Pennsylvania, and Maryland passed acts of religious toleration in 1776.{{cite book |author=John Tracy Ellis |title=American Catholicism |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=WLYc80eu1u0C&pg=PA37 |year=1969 |publisher=U of Chicago Press |page=37|isbn=9780226205564 }} George Washington, as commander of the army and as president, was a vigorous promoter of tolerance for all religious denominations. He believed religion was an important support for public order, morality and virtue. He often attended services of different denominations. He suppressed anti-Catholic celebrations in the Army.Paul F. Boller, "George Washington and Religious Liberty." William and Mary Quarterly (1960): 486-506. [https://www.jstor.org/stable/1943414 in JSTOR] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200501112207/https://www.jstor.org/stable/1943414 |date=May 1, 2020 }}

The Patriot reliance on Catholic France for military, financial, and diplomatic aid led to a sharp drop in anti-Catholic rhetoric. Indeed, George III replaced the Pope as the "demon" Patriots fought against. Anti-Catholicism remained strong among Loyalists, some of whom went to Canada after the war while 80% remained in the new nation. By the 1780s, Catholics were extended legal toleration in all of the New England states that previously had been so hostile, and the anti-Catholic tradition of Pope Night was discontinued.{{cite web |title=George Washington Expresses Surprise |website=The Bostonian Society |date=2010 |url=http://display.5thofnovember.us/2007/10/george-washington-tries-to-stop.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080602020808/http://display.5thofnovember.us/2007/10/george-washington-tries-to-stop.html |archive-date=June 2, 2008 |url-status=dead |access-date=November 9, 2010 }} "In the midst of war and crisis, New Englanders gave up not only their allegiance to Britain but one of their most dearly held prejudices."Francis Cogliano, No King, No Popery: Anti-Catholicism in Revolutionary New England (1995) pp 154-55, quote p 155.. [https://www.questia.com/library/3763417/no-king-no-popery-anti-catholicism-in-revolutionary online] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190406034813/https://www.questia.com/library/3763417/no-king-no-popery-anti-catholicism-in-revolutionary |date=April 6, 2019 }}

File:Udo J.,Keppler The American Pope 1894 Cornell CUL PJM 1118 01.jpg Archbishop Francesco Satolli in 1894, casting his controlling shadow across the U.S.]]

In 1836, Maria Monk's Awful Disclosures of the Hotel Dieu Nunnery in Montreal was published. It was a great commercial success and is still circulated today by such publishers as Jack Chick. It was discovered to be a fabrication shortly after publication.Ray Allen Billington, "Maria Monk and her influence." Catholic Historical Review (1936): 283-296. [https://www.jstor.org/stable/25013504 in JSTOR] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190117020309/https://www.jstor.org/stable/25013504 |date=January 17, 2019 }} It was the most prominent of many such pamphlets. Numerous ex-priests and ex-nuns were on the anti-Catholic lecture circuit with lurid tales, always involving heterosexual contacts of adults—priests and nuns with dead babies buried in the basement.Marie Anne Pagliarini, "The pure American woman and the wicked Catholic priest: An analysis of anti-Catholic literature in antebellum America." Religion and American Culture (1999): 97-128. [https://www.jstor.org/stable/1123928 in JSTOR] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190117020315/https://www.jstor.org/stable/1123928 |date=January 17, 2019 }}

Anti-Catholicism reached a peak in the mid nineteenth century when Protestant leaders became alarmed by the heavy influx of Catholic immigrants from Ireland and Germany. Some Protestant ministers said that the Catholic Church was the Whore of Babylon who is mentioned in the Book of Revelation.{{cite book |last=Bilhartz |first=Terry D. |title=Urban Religion and the Second Great Awakening |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=pK_DqHjUfg4C |year= 1986|publisher=Fairleigh Dickinson University Press |location=Madison, NJ |isbn=0-8386-3227-0 |page=115}}

{{Main article|Nativism (politics)|Know-Nothing Riots in United States politics}}

{{See also|Order of the Star Spangled Banner}}

File:94-RomanismAtWashington.jpg, an anti-Catholic secret society, depicting the pope as the master decision-maker controlling the White House, Congress, and federal financial and publishing institutions. (Art from an 1894 book.)]]

File:No Catholic Need Apply.png, February 14, 1855.]]

In the 1830s and 1840s, prominent Protestant leaders, such as Lyman Beecher and Horace Bushnell, attacked the Catholic Church, not just by accusing it of being theologically unsound, they also accused it of being an enemy of the nation's republicanism.{{cite book |last=Beecher |first=Lyman |title=A Plea for the West |url=http://libsysdigi.library.uiuc.edu/oca/Books2007-07/pleaforwest00beec/ |access-date=April 10, 2010 |year=1835 |publisher=Truman & Smith |location=Cincinnati |page=61 |quote=The Catholic system is adverse to liberty, and the clergy to a great extent are dependent on foreigners opposed to the principles of our government, for patronage and support. |isbn=0-405-09941-X}} Some scholars view the rhetoric of Beecher and Bushnell as having contributed to anti-Irish and anti-Catholic attitudes.{{Cite web |url=http://www.wfu.edu/~matthetl/perspectives/seventeen.html |first=Terry |last=Matthews |title=Lecture 16 – Catholicism in Nineteenth Century America |access-date=April 3, 2009 |archive-url=https://archive.today/20010529012128/http://www.wfu.edu/~matthetl/perspectives/seventeen.html |archive-date=May 29, 2001 |url-status=dead }}{{cite book |title=Our Sunday Visitor's Catholic Encyclopedia |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=vJ78Vd4O9d4C&q=%22Lyman+Beecher+and+Horace+Bushnell%22+Catholic&pg=PA80 |publisher=Our Sunday Visitor Publishing, Inc. |author1=Stravinskas, Peter M.J. |author2=Shaw, Russell |year=1998 |isbn=978-0-87973-669-9 }}

Beecher's well-known Plea for the West (1835) urged Protestants to exclude Catholics from western settlements. The Catholic Church's official silence on the subject of slavery also garnered the enmity of northern Protestants.{{cite book|author=Charles E. Curran|title=The Social Mission of the U.S. Catholic Church: A Theological Perspective|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=9cYLQ0PbN0QC&pg=PA4|year=2010|publisher=Georgetown UP|page=4|isbn=978-1589017641}} Intolerance became more than an attitude on August 11, 1834, when a mob set fire to an Ursuline convent in Charlestown, Massachusetts.

The resulting "nativist" movement, which acquired prominence in the 1840s, was whipped into a frenzy of anti-Catholicism which led to mob violence, the burning of Catholic property, and the killing of Catholics.{{cite web|url=http://www.catholic.com/thisrock/2001/0103bt.asp |title=The History of Anti-Catholicism |access-date=November 10, 2008 |author=Jimmy Akin |work=This Rock |publisher=Catholic Answers |date=March 1, 2001 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080907171941/http://www.catholic.com/thisrock/2001/0103bt.asp |archive-date=September 7, 2008 }} This violence was fed by claims that Catholics were destroying the culture of the United States. Irish Catholic immigrants were blamed for spreading violence and drunkenness.{{Cite book | isbn = 978-0-19-503268-0 | page = [https://archive.org/details/americancatholic00henn/page/119 119] | last = Hennesey | first = James J. | title = American Catholics | year = 1983 | url = https://archive.org/details/americancatholic00henn/page/119 }}{{Cite journal |last=Young |first=Julia G. |date=August 8, 2018 |title=Making America 1920 Again? Nativism and US Immigration, past and Present |url=http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/233150241700500111 |journal=Journal on Migration and Human Security |language=en |volume=5 |issue=1 |pages=217–235 |doi=10.1177/233150241700500111 |issn=2331-5024 |doi-access=free |archive-date=March 31, 2023 |access-date=March 6, 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230331182222/https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/233150241700500111 |url-status=live }} The nativist movement found its voice in the Know-Nothing Party of the mid-1850s, a short-lived national political movement which (unsuccessfully) ran former president Millard Fillmore as its presidential candidate in 1856.

Nativist, anti-Catholic movements continued with the American Protective Association of the 1890s.{{citation |last=Safire |first=William |author-link=William Safire |title=Safire's Political Dictionary |year=2008 |publisher=Oxford University Press |location=New York, New York |isbn=978-0-19-534061-7 |pages=375–76}} This movement began in 1887, in Clinton, Iowa, to discuss the recent electoral defeat of incumbent mayor Arnold Walliker, blamed on the organized efforts of Roman Catholics in the local organized labor movement.Donald L. Kinzer, An Episode in Anti-Catholicism: The American Protective Association. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1964; pp. 36-37. The Association denounced various politicians as Catholic-"controlled", and claimed credit for aiding Republican electoral victories of the period.Albert Clark Stevens, [https://archive.org/details/cyclopdiaoffra00stevrich The Cyclopædia of Fraternities: A Compilation of Existing Authentic Information and the Results of Original Investigation as to More Than Six Hundred Secret Societies in the United States.] New York: Hamilton Printing and Publishing Co., 1899; pp. 295-297.

{{main|Blaine Amendment}}

File:American river Ganges crop.jpg depicting Roman Catholic bishops as crocodiles attacking public schools, with the connivance of Irish Catholic politicians. Nast was an immigrant from Germany and ex-Catholic.]]

File:conspiratorkkk.jpg, 1926]]

Catholic schools began in the United States as a matter of religious and ethnic pride and as a way to insulate Catholic youth from the influence of Protestant teachers and contact with non-Catholic students.James W. Sanders, The Education of an Urban Minority (1977), pp. 21, 37–8.

In 1869 the religious issue in New York City escalated when Tammany Hall, with its large Catholic base, sought and obtained $1.5 million in state money for Catholic schools. Thomas Nast's cartoon The American River Ganges (above) shows Catholic bishops, directed by the Vatican, as crocodiles attacking American schoolchildren.{{Cite book | isbn = 978-0-7867-1686-9 | page = [https://archive.org/details/bosstweedrisefal00acke_0/page/381 381] | last = Ackerman | first = Kenneth D. | title = Boss Tweed | url = https://archive.org/details/bosstweedrisefal00acke_0 | url-access = registration | year = 2005 }}{{Cite journal | issn = 1052-1151 | volume = 14 | issue = 2 | page = 243 | last = Thomas | first = Samuel J. | title = Mugwump Cartoonists, the Papacy, and Tammany Hall in America's Gilded Age | journal = Religion and American Culture | year = 2004 | jstor = 4148267 | doi=10.1525/rac.2004.14.2.213| s2cid = 145410903 }}

Republican Minority Leader of the House of Representatives, James G. Blaine of Maine proposed an amendment to the US Constitution in 1874 that provided: "No money raised by taxation in any State for the support of public schools, or derived from any public source, nor any public lands devoted thereto, shall ever be under the control of any religious sect, nor shall any money so raised or land so devoted be divided between religious sects or denominations." President Ulysses S. Grant supported the Blaine Amendment. He feared a future with "patriotism and intelligence on one side and superstition, ambition and greed on the other" and called for public schools that would be "unmixed with atheistic, pagan or sectarian teaching."David B. Tyack and Elisabeth Hansot, Managers of Virtue: Public School Leadership in America, 1820–1980 (1986) Page 77 [https://books.google.com/books?id=anv-FUzf3BwC&pg=PA77 online]

The amendment was defeated in 1875 but would be used as a model for so-called Blaine Amendments incorporated into 34 state constitutions over the subsequent three decades. These state-level "Blaine amendments" prohibit the use of public funds to fund parochial schools.{{Better source needed|date=March 2020}}In 2002, the Supreme Court partially vitiated these amendments, in theory, when they ruled that vouchers were constitutional if tax dollars followed a child to a school, even if it were religious. However, as of 2010, no state school system had changed its laws to allow state funds to be used for this purpose.{{cite book | author = Bush, Jeb | title = NO: Choice forces educators to improve | publisher= The Atlanta Constitution-Journal | date= March 4, 2009}}

According to Marie Anne Pagliarini:Marie Anne Pagliarini, "The pure American woman and the wicked Catholic priest: An analysis of anti-Catholic literature in antebellum America." Religion and American Culture 9.1 (1999): 97-128.See also Joseph G. Mannard, "American Anti-Catholicism and Its Literature," Ex Libris 4#1 (1981): 2-9.Sandra Frink, "Women, the family, and the fate of the nation in American anti-Catholic narratives, 1830-1860." Journal of the History of Sexuality 18.2 (2009): 237-264.Joseph G. Mannard, "Protestant Mothers and Catholic Sisters: Gender Concerns in Anti-Catholic Conspiracy Theories, 1830-1860." American Catholic Studies (2000): 1-21. [https://www.jstor.org/stable/44194910 online] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231223051430/https://www.jstor.org/stable/44194910 |date=December 23, 2023 }}

The anti-Catholic literature that appeared during 1830-60 strengthened Protestant identity and established standards for sexuality. The literature portrayed Catholicism as a threat to the ideas that comprised the "cult of domesticity" - family values, gender boundaries, and sexual norms. In particular it singled out the celibacy of priests as a sin and violation of the law of nature and assumed men's efforts to repress their sexual energy would lead inevitably to child abuse, incest, rape, and murder. The literature claimed that celibate priests, through their abuse of the confessional and the convent, threatened the sexual purity of American women.

A new appreciation of Catholicism appeared in the early 20th century that tended to neutralize anti-Catholic sentiments. In the Midwest Jacques Marquette was celebrated as a founding father of the region, with his Catholicism emphasized.Katherine D. Moran, The Imperial Church: Catholic Founding Fathers and United States Empire (Cornell University Press, 2020). In St Louis and New Orleans, both Catholic cities, a focus on the French and Catholic colonial heritage became even stronger.

In California, where Protestantism was not strong, local boosters celebrated the history of Spanish Franciscan missions.Moran, The Imperial Church: Catholic Founding Fathers and United States Empire (2020) They not only preserved old missions (which had been inactive since the 1830s) but began appealing to tourists with a romantic mission story. The mission style became popular for public schools and non-Catholic colleges.

In the newly acquired Philippines, American government officials, journalists, and popular writers celebrated the Catholic missionary efforts that had transformed a "pagan" land, arguing that Filipino Catholic faith and clerical authority could aid in economic and cultural development. Future President William Howard Taft, the top American official in Manila, was a leader in the new movement. He gave a speech at the Catholic University of Notre Dame in Indiana in 1904, and praised the "enterprise, courage, and fidelity to duty that distinguished those heroes of Spain who braved the then frightful dangers of the deep to carry Christianity and European civilization into the far-off Orient." Taft, in 1909, went to California to praise Father Junípero Serra as an "apostle, legislator, [and] builder" who advanced "the beginning of civilization in California."Katherine D. Moran, "Catholicism and the Making of the US Pacific." Journal of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era 12.4 (2013): 434-474.

File:Anti-Catholic octopus cartoon.jpg's 1913 anti-Catholic book, The Pope: Chief of White Slavers High Priest of Intrigue]] The Menace, a weekly newspaper with a virulently anti-Catholic stance, was founded in 1911 and quickly reached a nationwide circulation of 1.5 million.

File:klantreerome.jpg 1925 by Bishop Alma White published by the Pillar of Fire Church in Zarephath, NJ]]

Anti-Catholicism was widespread in the 1920s; anti-Catholics, led by the Ku Klux Klan, believed that Catholicism was incompatible with democracy and that parochial schools encouraged separatism and kept Catholics from becoming loyal Americans. The Catholics responded to such prejudices by repeatedly asserting their rights as American citizens and by arguing that they, not the nativists (anti-Catholics), were true patriots since they believed in the right to freedom of religion.Dumenil (1991)

With the rapid growth of the second Ku Klux Klan (KKK) 1921–25, anti-Catholic rhetoric intensified. The Catholic Church of the Little Flower was first built in 1925 in Royal Oak, Michigan, a largely Protestant town. Two weeks after it opened, the Ku Klux Klan burned a cross in front of the church.{{cite book |last1= Shannon |first1= William V. |author-link1= William V. Shannon |title= The American Irish: a political and social portrait |url= https://books.google.com/books?id=3gBrb-SzlCkC&q=%22Ku+Klux+Klan%22+%22shrine+of+the+little+flower%22&pg=PA298 |year= 1989 |orig-year= 1963 |isbn= 978-0-87023-689-1

|oclc= 19670135 |page= 298 }}

On August 11, 1921, Father James Coyle was fatally shot on his rectory porch in Birmingham, Alabama. The shooter was Rev. E. R. Stephenson, a Southern Methodist Episcopal minister.Sharon Davies, "Tragedy in Birmingham", Columbia Magazine, vol. 90, no. 3 (March 2010), p. 31. The murder occurred just hours after Coyle had performed a wedding between Stephenson's daughter, Ruth, and Pedro Gussman, an American from Puerto Rico. Several months before the wedding, Ruth had enraged her father by converting to Roman Catholicism. Stephenson was defended by Hugo Black, a future Justice of the Supreme Court.

File:Father-coyle.jpg, a Roman Catholic priest, was assassinated by the Ku Klux Klan in Birmingham, Alabama, on August 11, 1921.]]

In Alabama, Hugo Black was elected to the U.S. Senate in 1926 after he had built a political base in part through his delivery of 148 speeches at local Klan gatherings, where his focus was the denunciation of Catholicism.Roger K. Newman, Hugo Black: a biography (1997) pp 87, 104 Howard Ball characterizes Black as having "sympathized with the [Klan's] economic, nativist, and anti-Catholic beliefs."Howard Ball, Hugo L. Black: cold steel warrior (1996) p. 16 As a Supreme Court justice, Black has been accused of letting his anti-Catholic bias influence key decisions regarding the separation of church and state. For example, Christianity Today editorialized that, "Black's advocacy of church-state separation, in turn, found its roots in the fierce anti-Catholicism of the Masons and the Ku Klux Klan (Black was a Kladd of the Klavern, or an initiator of new members, in his home state of Alabama in the early 1920s).""'A Crack in the Wall: Two recent books help explain Thomas Jefferson's intent for separation of church and state," Christianity Today Editorial Oct 7, 2002 [http://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2002/october7/28.33.html online] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100624131202/http://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2002/october7/28.33.html |date=June 24, 2010 }} A leading Constitutional scholar,"A leading US constitutional historian, Philip Hamburger," writes Martha Nussbaum, Liberty of conscience (2008) p 120 Professor Philip Hamburger of Columbia University Law School, has strongly called into question Black's integrity on the church-state issue because of his close ties to the KKK. Hamburger argues that his views on the need for separation of Church and State were deeply tainted by his membership in the Ku Klux Klan, a vehemently anti-Catholic organization.Philip Hamburger, Separation of Church and State (2002) pp 422–28

{{Further|Oregon Compulsory Education Act}}

In 1922, the voters of Oregon passed an initiative amending Oregon Law Section 5259, the Compulsory Education Act. The law unofficially became known as the Oregon School Law. The citizens' initiative was primarily aimed at eliminating parochial schools, including Catholic schools.Howard, J. Paul. [http://www.shibleyrighton.com/pdf/Howard/CEAArticleApril2001.pdf "Cross-Border Reflections, Parents' Right to Direct Their Children's Education Under the U.S. and Canadian Constitutions"] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081029102538/http://www.shibleyrighton.com/pdf/Howard/CEAArticleApril2001.pdf |date=October 29, 2008 }}, Education Canada, v41 n2 p36-37 Sum 2001. The law caused outraged Catholics to organize locally and nationally for the right to send their children to Catholic schools. In Pierce v. Society of Sisters (1925), the United States Supreme Court declared the Oregon's Compulsory Education Act unconstitutional in a ruling that has been called "the Magna Carta of the parochial school system."

File:AlSmithWaves.jpg was a Catholic of Irish, Italian and German ancestry; most voters considered him to be Irish.]]

File:goodcitizennovember1926.jpg Nov 1926, published by Pillar of Fire Church]]

The Klan collapsed in the mid-1920s. It had been denounced by most newspapers and had few prominent defenders. It was disgraced by scandals at high levels and weakened by its pyramid scheme system whereby organizers collected fees and then abandoned local chapters. By 1930 only a few small local chapters survived. No later national nativist organization ever achieved even a tiny fraction of the Klan membership.{{cite book|author=David Joseph Goldberg|title=Discontented America: The United States in the 1920s|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=-7hj0vfVjFUC&pg=PA139|year=1999|publisher=Johns Hopkins U.P.|pages=139–40|isbn=9780801860041}}

File:Ballot1.jpg illustration in Heroes of the Fiery Cross 1928 by Bishop Alma White, published by the Pillar of Fire Church in Zarephath, NJ]]

In 1928, Democrat Al Smith became the first Roman Catholic to gain a major party's nomination for president, and his religion became an issue during the campaign. His nomination made anti-Catholicism a rallying point especially for Lutheran and Southern Baptist ministers. They warned that national autonomy would be threatened because Smith would be listening not to the American people but to secret orders from the pope. There were rumors the pope would move to the United States to control his new realm.{{cite book | title=Empire statesman: the rise and redemption of Al Smith | author=Slayton, Robert A. | year=2001 | publisher=Simon and Schuster | isbn=0-684-86302-2 | url=https://archive.org/details/empirestatesmanr00robe }}{{rp|309–310}}

Across the country, and especially in strongholds of the Lutheran, Baptist and Fundamentalist churches, Protestant ministers spoke out. They seldom endorsed Republican Herbert Hoover, who was a Quaker. More often they alleged Smith was unacceptable. A survey of 8,500 Southern Methodist ministers found only four who publicly supported Smith. Many Americans who sincerely rejected bigotry and the Klan justified their opposition to Smith because they believed the Catholic Church was an "un-American" and "alien" culture that opposed freedom and democracy.{{r|slayton2001}}{{rp|311–312}} The National Lutheran Editors' and Managers' Association opposed Smith's election in a manifesto written by Dr. Clarence Reinhold Tappert. It warned about "the peculiar relation in which a faithful Catholic stands and the absolute allegiance he owes to a 'foreign sovereign' who does not only 'claim' supremacy also in secular affairs as a matter of principle and theory but who, time and again, has endeavored to put this claim into practical operation." The Catholic Church, the manifesto asserted, was hostile to American principles of separation of church and state and of religious toleration.Douglas C. Strange, "Lutherans and Presidential Politics: The National Lutheran Editors' and Managers' Association Statement of 1928," Concordia Historical Institute Quarterly, Winter 1968, Vol. 41 Issue 4, pp 168–172 Prohibition had widespread support in rural Protestant towns, and Smith's wet position, as well as his long-time sponsorship by Tammany Hall compounded his difficulties there. He was weakest in the border states; the day after Smith gave a talk pleaded for brotherhood in Oklahoma City, the same auditorium was jammed for an evangelist who lectured on "Al Smith and the Forces of Hell."George J. Marlin, American Catholic Voter: Two Hundred Years of Political Impact (2006) p 184 Smith picked Senator Joe Robinson, a prominent Arkansas Senator, as his running mate. Efforts by Senator Tom Heflin to recycle his long-standing attacks on the pope failed in Alabama.Eddie Weller and Cecil Weller, Joe T. Robinson: Always a Loyal Democrat (1998) p 110 Smith's strong anti-Klan position resonated across the country with voters who thought the KKK was a real threat to democracy.John T. McGreevy, Catholicism and American Freedom: A History (2004) p 148 When the pro-Smith Democrats raised the race issue against the Republicans, they were able to contain their losses in areas with black majorities but where only whites voted. Smith carried most of the Deep South—long identified with anti-Catholicism-although losing the periphery. After 1928, the Solid South returned to the Democratic fold.Allan J. Lichtman, Prejudice and the Old Politics: The Presidential Election of 1928 (1979) One long-term result was a surge in Democratic voting in large cities, as ethnic Catholics went to the polls to defend their religious culture, often bringing women to the polls for the first time. The nation's twelve largest cities gave pluralities of 1.6 million to the GOP in 1920, and 1.3 million in 1924; now they went for Smith by a razor-thin 38,000 votes, while everywhere else was for Hoover. The surge proved permanent; Catholics made up a major portion of the New Deal Coalition that Franklin D. Roosevelt assembled and which dominated national elections for decades.William B. Prendergast, The Catholic Voter in American Politics: The Passing of the Democratic Monolith (1999) pp 96–115

President Franklin D. Roosevelt depended heavily in his four elections on the Catholic vote and the enthusiasm of Irish-led Democratic machines in most major cities, especially New York, Boston, Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, St Louis, Kansas City, Chicago, and Detroit. At the grassroots, Catholic bishops, priests and pastors gave very strong support to Roosevelt in the New Deal.Monroe Billington, and Cal Clark, "Catholic clergymen, Franklin D. Roosevelt, and the New Deal." Catholic Historical Review 79.1 (1993): 65-82 [https://www.jstor.org/stable/25023945 online] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230209163810/https://www.jstor.org/stable/25023945 |date=February 9, 2023 }}.Roberto Marie Ike, "Catholic priests and Franklin D. Roosevelt: Analysis of clergy consensus on the New Deal" (PhD dissertation, Saint Louis University; ProQuest Dissertations Publishing, 2000. 3000677] On election day Catholic turnout soared and it overlapped heavily with the rapidly growing labor unions which organized workers to support Roosevelt.Kenneth J. Heineman, Catholic New Deal: Religion and Reform in Depression Pittsburgh (Penn State Press, 2010). The Gallup poll found 78% of Catholics voted for FDR in 1936.George H. Gallup, The Gallup Poll: Public Opinion, 1935-1971, (1972) vol 1, p. 3

At the elite level Al Smith and many of Smith's business associates broke with FDR and formed the American Liberty League, which represented big business opposition to the New Deal. Catholic radio priest Charles Coughlin supported FDR in 1932-1934, but broke with him in 1935 and made strident attacks. There were few senior Catholics in the New Deal. Postmaster General James Farley handled patronage and broke with FDR in 1940. He was replaced by another Catholic, Frank C. Walker. Ambassador Joseph P. Kennedy Sr. was on the verge of breaking in 1940 on foreign policy but finally supported FDR in the interest of his sons.

In foreign policy the Catholics demanded American neutrality regarding the Spanish Civil War, and were joined by isolationists. Liberals wanted Washington to help the anti-Catholic Loyalist cause, but FDR kept the nation neutral.J. David Valaik, "Catholics, Neutrality, and the Spanish Embargo, 1937–1939," Journal of American History (1967) 54#1 pp. 73-85 [https://www.jstor.org/stable/1900320 in JSTOR] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180829113114/https://www.jstor.org/stable/1900320 |date=August 29, 2018 }}

The second serious tension arose with the renewed anti-Catholic campaign in Mexico. American Catholics bitterly attacked Ambassador Josephus Daniels for failing to combat the virulent attacks on the Catholic Church by the Mexican government.Robert H. Vinca, "The American Catholic Reaction to the Persecution of the Church in Mexico, from 1926–1936," Records of the American Catholic Historical Society of Philadelphia (1968) Issue 1, pp 3-38. Daniels was a staunch Methodist and worked well with Catholics in the U.S., but he had little sympathy for the church in Mexico, feeling it represented the landed aristocracy that stood opposed to his version of liberalism. For the same reason he supported the Loyalist cause in the Spanish Civil War, which was even more intensely anti-Catholic. The main issue was the government's efforts to shut down Catholic schools in Mexico; Daniels publicly approved the attacks, and saluted virulently anti-Catholic Mexican politicians. In a July 1934 speech at the American Embassy, Daniels praised the anti-Catholic efforts led by former president Calles:

General Calles sees, as Jefferson saw, that no people can be both free and ignorant. Therefore, he and President Rodriguez, President-elect Cairdenas and all forward-looking leaders are placing public education as the paramount duty of the country. They all recognize that General Calles issued a challenge that goes to the very root of the settlement of all problems of tomorrow when he said: "We must enter and take possession of the mind of childhood, the mind of youth."E. David Cronon, "American Catholics and Mexican Anticlericalism, 1933–1936," Mississippi Valley Historical Review (1958) 45#2 pp. 201-230 [https://www.jstor.org/stable/1902927 in JSTOR] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190117020318/https://www.jstor.org/stable/1902927 |date=January 17, 2019 }}; quote p. 207

In 1935, Senator William Borah of Idaho, the chief Republican specialist on foreign policy, called for a Senate investigation of anti-Catholic government policies in Mexico. He came under a barrage of attacks from leading Protestant organizations, including the Federal Council of Churches, the Episcopal Church, and the board of foreign missions of the Methodist Church. There was no Senate investigation. A call for an investigation signed by 250 members of the House was blocked by Roosevelt. The Knights of Columbus began attacking Roosevelt. The crisis ended with Mexico turning away from the Calles hard line policies, perhaps in response to Daniels' backstage efforts. Roosevelt easily won all the Catholic strongholds in his 1936 landslide.Cronon, "American Catholics and Mexican Anticlericalism, 1933–1936," p 216-25

World War II was the decisive event that brought religious tolerance to the front in American life. Bruscino says "the military had developed personnel policies that actively and completely mixed America's diverse white ethnic and religious population." The sudden removal from the comforts of home, the often degrading and humiliating experiences of military life, and the unit- and friendship-building of training leveled the men. The activities meant to fill time in support of the military reminded the men of all they had in common as Americans. Under fire, the men survived by leaning on buddies, regardless of their ethnicity or religion. After coming home, the veterans helped reshape American society. Brucino says that they used their positions of power "to increase ethnic and religious tolerance. The sea change in ethnic and religious relations in the United States came from the military experience in World War II. The war remade the nation. The nation was forged in war."{{cite book|author=Thomas A. Bruscino|title=A Nation Forged in War: How World War II Taught Americans to Get Along|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=YRaZmrVQh-MC&pg=PA214|year=2010|publisher=U. of Tennessee Press|pages=214–15|isbn=9781572336957}}

In 1946, the judge David A Rose, called upon Boston's attorney general to investigate anti-Catholic and anti-Jewish alleged activities and publications of the Anglo-Saxon Federation of America.{{Cite book|last=Relations|first=National Conference on Intergroup|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=bjc11UWdvw4C&q=%22david+a+rose%22|title=Report...|date=1946|language=en}}

At the elite level, tolerance of Catholicism was more problematic. Henry A. Wallace, Roosevelt's vice-president in 1941–1945, did not go public with his anti-Catholicism, but he often expounded it in his diary, especially during and after World War II. He briefly attended a Catholic church in the 1920s, and was disillusioned by what he perceived to be the intellectual straitjacket of Thomism.John C. Culver and John Hyde, American Dreamer: A Life of Henry a. Wallace (2000), p 77 By the 1940s, he worried that certain "bigoted Catholics" were scheming to take control of the Democratic Party; indeed the Catholic big city bosses in 1944 played a major role in denying him renomination as vice president.Culver and Hyde, American Dreamer, pp 293, 317 He confided in his diary that it was "increasingly clear" that the State Department intended "to save American boys lives by handing the world over to the Catholic Church and saving it from communism."Culver and Hyde, American Dreamer, p 292 In 1949, Wallace opposed NATO, warning that "certain elements in the hierarchy of the Catholic Church" were involved in a pro-war hysteria.Culver and Hyde, American Dreamer, p 504 Defeated for the presidency in his third-party run in 1948, Wallace blamed the UK's Conservative Party, the Catholic Church, capitalism, and various others forces for his overwhelming defeat.Culver and Hyde, American Dreamer, p 512

Image:poperob.jpg, an anti-Catholic caricature by the Ku Klux Klan-affiliate Alma White (1943), founder and bishop of the Pillar of Fire Church.]]

Eleanor Roosevelt, the president's widow, and other New Deal liberals who were fighting Irish-dominated Democratic parties, feuded publicly with church leaders on national policy. They accused her of being anti-Catholic. In July 1949, Roosevelt had a public disagreement with Francis Joseph Spellman, the Catholic Archbishop of New York, which was characterized as "a battle still remembered for its vehemence and hostility".{{cite book|author=Lash, Joseph P. |title=Eleanor: The Years Alone|url=https://archive.org/details/eleanoryearsalon00las_9v1 |url-access=registration |publisher=W.W. Norton & Company|year=1972|isbn=0-39307-361-0|location=Scarborough, Ont.}}, pp. 156–65, 282.Beasley, Eleanor Roosevelt Encyclopedia pp. 498–502 In her columns, Roosevelt had attacked proposals for federal funding of certain nonreligious activities at parochial schools, such as bus transportation for students. Spellman cited the Supreme Court's decision which upheld such provisions, accusing her of anti-Catholicism. Most Democrats rallied behind Roosevelt, and Spellman eventually met with her at her Hyde Park home to quell the dispute. However, Roosevelt maintained her belief that Catholic schools should not receive federal aid, evidently heeding the writings of secularists such as Paul Blanshard. Privately, Roosevelt said that if the Catholic Church gained school aid, "Once that is done they control the schools, or at least a great part of them."

During the Spanish Civil War in the late 1930s, Eleanor Roosevelt favored the republican Loyalists against General Francisco Franco's Nationalists; after 1945, she opposed normalizing relations with Spain.Beasley, Eleanor Roosevelt Encyclopedia p. 492. She told Spellman bluntly that "I cannot however say that in European countries the control by the Roman Catholic Church of great areas of land has always led to happiness for the people of those countries." Her son Elliott Roosevelt suggested that her "reservations about Catholicism" were rooted in her husband's sexual affairs with Lucy Mercer and Missy LeHand, who were both Catholics.Elliot Roosevelt and James Brough (1973) An Untold Story, New York: Dell, p. 282.

Roosevelt's biographer Joseph P. Lash denies that she was anti-Catholic, citing her public support of Al Smith, a Catholic, in the 1928 presidential campaign and her statement to a New York Times reporter that year quoting her uncle, President Theodore Roosevelt, in expressing "the hope to see the day when a Catholic or a Jew would become president".Eleanor Roosevelt, as quoted in The New York Times, January 25, 1928, by Lash, p. 419.

In 1949, Paul Blanshard wrote in his bestselling book American Freedom and Catholic Power that America had a "Catholic Problem". He stated that the church was an "undemocratic system of alien control" in which the lay were chained by the "absolute rule of the clergy." In 1951, in Communism, Democracy, and Catholic Power, he compared Rome with Moscow as "two alien and undemocratic centers", including "thought control".[https://books.google.com/books?id=ooVpNkznFYQC Blanshard, American Freedom and Catholic Power ]

Professor Daniel Dreisbach argues regarding the organization Protestants and other Americans United for the Separation of Church and State:

:In the mid-20th century, the rhetoric of separation was revived and ultimately constitutionalized by anti-Catholic elites, such as...Protestants and other Americans United for the Separation of Church and State...who feared the influence and wealth of the Catholic Church and perceived parochial education as a threat to public schools and democratic values.Daniel L. Dreisbach, "The Meaning of the Separation of Church and State" in {{cite book|editor=Derek H. Davis|title=The Oxford Handbook of Church and State in the United States|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=WX2LcraS1EgC&pg=PA219|year=2017|publisher=Oxford University Press|page=219|isbn=9780195326246}}

On October 20, 1951, President Harry Truman nominated former General Mark Clark to be the United States emissary to the Vatican. Clark was forced to withdraw his nomination on January 13, 1952, following protests from Texas Senator Tom Connally and Protestant groups.

In the 1950s prejudices against Catholics could still be heard from some Protestant ministers, but national leaders increasingly tried to build up a common front against communism and stressed the common values shared by Protestants, Catholics and Jews. Leaders like Dwight D. Eisenhower emphasized how Judeo-Christian values were a central component of American national identity.Martin E. Marty, Modern American Religion, Volume 3: Under God, Indivisible, 1941–1960 (1999)

File:John F. Kennedy, White House color photo portrait.jpg, first Catholic President, elected 1960.]]

{{Main|1960 United States presidential election}}

A key factor that affected the vote for and against John F. Kennedy in his 1960 campaign for the presidency of the United States was his Catholic faith. Catholics mobilized and gave Kennedy from 75 to 80 percent of their votes.{{cite book|author=Theodore H. White|title=The Making of the President 1960|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=pIeSn5gtRqMC&pg=PA355|year=2009|publisher=HarperCollins|page=355|isbn=9780061986017}}

Prominent Protestant spokesmen, led by Billy Graham and Norman Vincent Peale, organized Protestant ministers by warning that the pope would be giving orders to a Kennedy White House. Many established Evangelical groups were mobilized. Two organizations took active roles, the National Conference of Citizens for Religious Freedom and Protestants and Other Americans United for Separation of Church and State.{{cite book|author=Robert L. Fleegler|title=Ellis Island Nation: Immigration Policy and American Identity in the Twentieth Century|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=UpkAJo3vOWYC&pg=PA148|year=2013|publisher=U of Pennsylvania Press|page=148|isbn=978-0812208092}} Peale was blasted by the media for his anti-Catholicism and retreated, denying the facts of his organizing role. Graham pushed hard against Kennedy, keeping Nixon informed of his progress.{{cite book|author=Shaun Casey|title=The Making of a Catholic President: Kennedy vs. Nixon 1960|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=4bDL1p-Dtu8C&pg=PA146|year=2009|publisher=Oxford University Press|isbn=978-0-19-974363-6|pages=143–46}}

To allay such Protestant fears, Kennedy kept his distance from Catholic Church officials and in a highly publicized speech told the Protestant ministers of the Greater Houston Ministerial Association on September 12, 1960, "I am not the Catholic candidate for President. I am the Democratic Party's candidate for President who also happens to be a Catholic. I do not speak for my Church on public matters – and the Church does not speak for me."{{cite web|url=https://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/jfkhoustonministers.html |title=Address to the Greater Houston Ministerial Association |access-date=September 17, 2007 |last=Kennedy |first=John F. |date=June 18, 2002 |work=American Rhetoric |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070911175450/http://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/jfkhoustonministers.html |archive-date=September 11, 2007 |url-status=dead }} He promised to respect the separation of church and state and not to allow church officials to dictate public policy to him. Kennedy counterattacked by suggesting that it was bigotry to relegate one-quarter of all Americans to second-class citizenship just because they were Catholic. In the final count, the additions and subtractions to Kennedy's vote because of religion probably canceled out. He won a close election; The New York Times reported a "narrow consensus" among the experts that Kennedy had won more than he lost as a result of his Catholicism,New York Times, November 20, 1960, Section 4, p. E5 as Catholics flocked to Kennedy to demonstrate their group solidarity in demanding political equality.Massa, Mark S. "A Catholic for President: John F. Kennedy and the Secular Theology of the Houston Speech, 1960." Journal of Church and State 39 (1997): 297-317.

Concern about Catholic power and influence did not disappear with Kennedy's victory in 1960. Many Protestants would not take the Democratic candidate at his word. That was still apparent in 1961 and 1962 as the Kennedy Administration navigated treacherous issues like federal aid to education and Peace Corps contracts. Only gradually, by living up to his campaign pledges, could the president appease fears about the Catholic Church's role in politics. The Second Council of the Vatican and the sense that the church was reforming itself also helped diminish bigotry. The rise of more pressing issues – the campaign for racial equality and the Vietnam War – and the prospect of new political alliances had the same effect. Anti-Catholicism did not undermine William E. Miller's vice-presidential nomination in 1964 or Robert Kennedy's bid for the Democratic presidential in 1968.{{cite book |last1=Lacroix |first1=Patrick |title=John F. Kennedy and the Politics of Faith |date=2021 |publisher=University Press of Kansas |location=Lawrence}}

After the 1980 United States presidential election, the historic tensions between Evangelical Protestants and Roman Catholics faded dramatically. In politics, the two factions often joined forces with the Republican Party and formed the Christian right in order to advocate conservative positions on social and cultural issues, such as opposition to gay marriage and abortion. Both groups held tightly to traditional moral values and increasingly opposed secularization. Ronald Reagan was especially popular among both White Evangelicals and ethnic Catholics, known as Reagan Democrats. By the year 2000, the Republican coalition included about half the Roman Catholics and a large majority of White Evangelicals.{{cite book|author1=Kristin E. Heyer|title=Catholics and Politics: The Dynamic Tension Between Faith and Power|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=FuQ6mmwkuCAC&pg=PA40|year=2008|publisher=Georgetown University Press|pages=39–42|isbn=9781589012165|display-authors=etal}}

In 1980, The New York Times warned the Catholic bishops that if they followed the instructions of the Catholic Church and denied communion to politicians who advocated a pro-choice stance regarding abortion, they would be "imposing a test of religious loyalty" that might jeopardize "the truce of tolerance by which Americans maintain civility and enlarge religious liberty".{{cite web|url=https://www.nytimes.com/1989/11/26/opinion/the-bishop-and-the-truce-of-tolerance.html|title=The Bishop and the Truce of Tolerance (editorial)|work=The New York Times|date=November 26, 1989|access-date=August 21, 2015|archive-date=May 25, 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150525124440/http://www.nytimes.com/1989/11/26/opinion/the-bishop-and-the-truce-of-tolerance.html|url-status=live}}

Starting in 1993, members of Historic Adventist splinter groups paid to have anti-Catholic billboards that called the pope the Anti-Christ placed in various cities on the West Coast, including along Interstate 5 from Portland to Medford, Oregon, and in Albuquerque, New Mexico. One such group took out an anti-Catholic ad on Easter Sunday in The Oregonian, in 2000, as well as in newspapers in Coos Bay, Oregon, and in Longview and Vancouver, Washington. Mainstream Seventh-day Adventists denounced the advertisements. The contract for the last of the billboards in Oregon ran out in 2002.{{cite news |last= Langlois |first= Ed |title= Spruced-up billboard marks beginning of new 'pope-is-Antichrist' campaign |work= Catholic Sentinel |date= July 27, 2001 |url= http://www.catholicsentinel.org/main.asp?Search=1&ArticleID=6238&SectionID=2&SubSectionID=35&S=1 |access-date= June 19, 2011 |archive-date= July 27, 2011 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20110727004112/http://www.catholicsentinel.org/main.asp?Search=1&ArticleID=6238&SectionID=2&SubSectionID=35&S=1 |url-status= dead }}{{cite news |last= Mehle |first= Michael |title= Billboard Supplier Won't Run Attacks on Pope |publisher= Rocky Mountain News |date= August 4, 1993 |url= http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_product=RM&p_theme=rm&p_action=search&p_maxdocs=200&p_topdoc=1&p_text_direct-0=0EB4DCE9BA791262&p_field_direct-0=document_id&p_perpage=10&p_sort=YMD_date:D&s_trackval=GooglePM |access-date= June 19, 2011 |archive-date= February 25, 2021 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20210225043024/http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_product=RM&p_theme=rm&p_action=search&p_maxdocs=200&p_topdoc=1&p_text_direct-0=0EB4DCE9BA791262&p_field_direct-0=document_id&p_perpage=10&p_sort=YMD_date:D&s_trackval=GooglePM |url-status= live }}{{cite news |author= Associated Press |title= Billboard Bashing |work= Salt Lake Tribune |date= December 25, 1993}}{{cite news |last= Langlois |first= Ed |title= Billboard contract lapses, 'Pope is Antichrist' remains; more ads planned |work= Catholic Sentinel |date= June 6, 2002 |url= http://www.catholicsentinel.org/main.asp?Search=1&ArticleID=6241&SectionID=2&SubSectionID=35&S=1 |access-date= June 19, 2011 |archive-date= July 27, 2011 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20110727004122/http://www.catholicsentinel.org/main.asp?Search=1&ArticleID=6241&SectionID=2&SubSectionID=35&S=1 |url-status= dead }}{{cite news |last= Langlois |first= Ed |title= Oregonian runs anti-Catholic ad on Easter |work= Catholic Sentinel |date= April 29, 2000 |url= http://www.catholicsentinel.org/main.asp?Search=1&ArticleID=4960&SectionID=2&SubSectionID=35&S=1 |access-date= June 19, 2011 |archive-date= July 27, 2011 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20110727004135/http://www.catholicsentinel.org/main.asp?Search=1&ArticleID=4960&SectionID=2&SubSectionID=35&S=1 |url-status= dead }}

Philip Jenkins, an Episcopalian historian, maintains that some who otherwise avoid offending members of racial, religious, ethnic or gender groups have no reservations about venting their hatred of Catholics.Philip Jenkins, The New Anti-Catholicism: The Last Acceptable Prejudice. (Oxford University Press 2005 {{ISBN|0-19-515480-0}})

In May 2006, a Gallup poll found that 57% of Americans had a favorable view of the Catholic faith, while 30% of Americans had an unfavorable view. The Catholic Church's doctrines, and the priest sex abuse scandal were top issues for those who disapproved. The church's view on homosexuality, and the celibate priesthood were low on the list of grievances for those who held an unfavorable view of Catholicism.{{Cite web | title = Religion | date =June 8, 2007 | access-date =May 12, 2009 | url = http://www.gallup.com/poll/1690/Religion.aspx | archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20090514194630/http://www.gallup.com/poll/1690/Religion.aspx| archive-date= May 14, 2009 | url-status= live}} A slightly higher unfavorable view of the Catholic Church was the common preaching of poverty theology which was in stark contrast to the splendor of the Vatican. While Protestants and Catholics themselves had a majority with a favorable view, those who are not Christian or are irreligious had a majority with an unfavorable view.

In April 2008, Gallup found that the number of Americans saying they had a positive view of U.S. Catholics had shrunk to 45% with 13% reporting a negative opinion. A substantial proportion of Americans, 41%, said their view of Catholics was neutral, while 2% of Americans indicated that they had a "very negative" view of Roman Catholics. However, with a net positive opinion of 32%, sentiment towards Catholics was more positive than that for both evangelical and fundamentalist Christians, who received net-positive opinions of 16 and 10% respectively. Gallup reported that Methodists and Baptists were viewed more positively than Catholics, as were Jews.{{cite web |url=http://www.gallup.com/poll/106516/Americans-NetPositive-View-US-Catholics.aspx |title=Americans Have Net-Positive View of U.S. Catholics |date=April 15, 2008 |access-date=February 23, 2009| archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20090306223921/http://www.gallup.com/poll/106516/Americans-NetPositive-View-US-Catholics.aspx| archive-date= March 6, 2009 | url-status= live}}

In August 2012, the New York Times reviewed the religion of the nine top national leaders: the presidential and vice-presidential nominees, the Supreme Court justices, the House Speaker, and the Senate majority leader. There were nine Catholics (six justices, both vice-presidential candidates, and the Speaker), three Jews (all from the Supreme Court), two Mormons (including the Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney) and one African-American Protestant (incumbent President Barack Obama). There were no white Protestants.David Leonhardt et al, "A Historical Benchmark," New York Times 14 August 2012.

The United States Conference of Catholic Bishops currently maintains a list of anti-Catholic attacks aimed at Catholic churches in the U.S. From May 2020 to May 2022, they reported that at least 139 incidents occurred across 35 U.S. states & the District of Columbia. These included cases of arson, beheaded statues, gravestones defaced with swastikas, smashed windows, pro-abortion graffiti, theft, and more having taken place in Catholic churches and buildings.{{cite web|author=USCCB|title=Arson, Vandalism, and Other Destruction at Catholic Churches in the United States|url=https://www.usccb.org/committees/religious-liberty/Backgrounder-Attacks-on-Catholic-Churches-in-US#tab--_022|work=USCCB.org|access-date=4 June 2022|archive-date=May 9, 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220509233956/https://www.usccb.org/committees/religious-liberty/Backgrounder-Attacks-on-Catholic-Churches-in-US#tab--_022|url-status=live}}

In 2021, The Wall Street Journal has noted that according to FBI statistics, anti-Catholic hate crimes have risen in recent years, with an annual increase since 2013. 73 anti-Catholic documented hate crimes occurred in 2019, an increase from 64 in 2019, and 51 in 2018.{{cite news|last=Mac Donald|first=Heather|title=A Year After George Floyd's Murder, It's 'Open Season' in Minneapolis|url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/a-year-after-george-floyds-murder-its-open-season-in-minneapolis-11621893383|work=Wall Street Journal|date=24 May 2021}}

{{Main|Sex and gender roles in the Catholic Church}}

LGBT activists and others often target the Catholic Church's teachings on issues relating to human sexuality, contraception and abortion.

In 1989, members of ACT UP and WHAM! disrupted a Sunday Mass at Saint Patrick's Cathedral to protest the church's position on homosexuality, sex education and the use of condoms. The protestors desecrated Communion hosts. According to Andrew Sullivan, "Some of the most anti-Catholic bigots in America are gay".{{cite web|url=http://americamagazine.org/node/145218|title=The Last Acceptable Prejudice? | America Magazine|date=March 25, 2000|publisher=americamagazine.org|access-date=August 21, 2015|archive-date=June 7, 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150607164501/http://americamagazine.org/node/145218|url-status=live}} One hundred eleven protesters were arrested outside the cathedral.{{cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/1987/07/27/nyregion/300-fault-o-connor-role-on-aids-commission.html?sec=health |title=300 Fault O'Connor Role On AIDS Commission - NYTimes.com |newspaper=The New York Times |date=July 27, 1987 |access-date=August 21, 2015|last1=Goldman |first1=Ari L. }}

On January 30, 2007, John Edwards' presidential campaign hired Amanda Marcotte as blogmaster.{{cite web |url=http://www.pandagon.net/2007/01/30/pandagon-changes/ |title=Pandagon changes |work=Pandagon |access-date=March 1, 2007 |date=January 30, 2007 |last=Marcotte |first=Amanda |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070210023506/http://pandagon.net/2007/01/30/pandagon-changes/ |archive-date=February 10, 2007 |url-status=dead |df=mdy }} The Catholic League, a pressure group not affiliated with the Catholic Church, took offense at her obscenity- and profanity-laced invective against Catholic doctrine and satiric rants against Catholic leaders, including some of her earlier writings, where she described sexual activity of the Holy Spirit and claimed that the church sought to "justify [its] misogyny with [...] ancient mythology."{{cite web|url=http://www.catholicleague.org/07press_releases/quarter_1/070206_Edwards.htm |title=News Release: John Edwards Hires Two Anti-Catholics |access-date=March 1, 2007 |date=February 6, 2007 |author=Catholic League |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070218163557/http://www.catholicleague.org/07press_releases/quarter_1/070206_Edwards.htm |archive-date=February 18, 2007 |author-link=Catholic League (U.S.) |url-status=dead |df=mdy }} The Catholic League publicly demanded that the Edwards campaign terminate Marcotte's appointment. Marcotte subsequently resigned, citing "sexually violent, threatening e-mails" she had received as a result of the controversy.{{cite news |date=February 16, 2007 |url=http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2007/02/16/marcotte/ |title=Why I had to quit the John Edwards campaign |access-date=July 30, 2007 |work=Salon.com |archive-date=March 31, 2007 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070331075739/http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2007/02/16/marcotte/ |url-status=live }}

{{Further|Anti-Catholicism in literature and media}}

According to the Jesuit priest James Martin, the U.S. entertainment industry is of "two minds" about the Catholic Church. He argues that:

On the one hand, film and television producers seem to find Catholicism irresistible. There are a number of reasons for this. First, more than any other Christian denomination, the Catholic Church is supremely visual, and therefore attractive to producers and directors concerned with the visual image. Vestments, monstrances, statues, crucifixes – to say nothing of the symbols of the sacraments – are all things that more "word oriented" Christian denominations have foregone. The Catholic Church, therefore, lends itself perfectly to the visual media of film and television. You can be sure that any movie about the Second Coming or Satan or demonic possession or, for that matter, any sort of irruption of the transcendent into everyday life, will choose the Catholic Church as its venue. (See, for example, "End of Days," "Dogma" or "Stigmata.")

Second, the Catholic Church is still seen as profoundly "other" in modern culture and is therefore an object of continuing fascination. As already noted, it is ancient in a culture that celebrates the new, professes truths in a postmodern culture that looks skeptically on any claim to truth, and speaks of mystery in a rational, post-Enlightenment world. It is therefore the perfect context for scriptwriters searching for the "conflict" required in any story.{{cite web |url=http://www.americamagazine.org/content/article.cfm?article_id=606 |title=The Last Acceptable Prejudice |access-date=November 10, 2008 |publisher=America The National Catholic Weekly |date=March 25, 2000 |archive-date=February 13, 2009 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090213220428/http://www.americamagazine.org/content/article.cfm?article_id=606 |url-status=live }}

He argues that, despite this fascination with the Catholic Church, the entertainment industry also holds contempt for the church. "It is as if producers, directors, playwrights and filmmakers feel obliged to establish their intellectual bona fides by trumpeting their differences with the institution that holds them in such thrall."

• Freedom of religion in the United States
• History of religion in the United States
• History of the Catholic Church in the United States
• History of Protestantism in the United States
• Religious discrimination in the United States
• Discrimination in the United States
• Know-Nothing Riots in United States politics
• Anti-French sentiment
• Anti-Irish sentiment
• Anti-Italianism
• Anti-Mexican sentiment
• Anti-Polish sentiment
• Anti-Slavic sentiment
• Hispanophobia
• {{slink|Nativism (politics)#United States}}
• Nativism in United States politics
• Racism in the United States
• Xenophobia in the United States

{{Reflist|2}}

{{refbegin|2}}

• Anbinder, Tyler. Nativism and Slavery: The Northern Know Nothings and the Politics of the 1850s (1992)
• Barnes, Kenneth C. Anti-Catholicism in Arkansas: How Politicians, the Press, the Klan, and Religious Leaders Imagined an Enemy, 1910–1960 (U of Arkansas Press, 2016). 266 pp.
• Bennett; David H. The Party of Fear: From Nativist Movements to the New Right in American History (University of North Carolina Press, 1988). [https://archive.org/details/partyoffearfromn0000benn online]
• Billington, Ray. The Protestant Crusade, 1830–1860: A Study of the Origins of American Nativism (1938); [https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.214564 online]
• Brown, Thomas M. "The Image of the Beast: Anti-Papal Rhetoric in Colonial America", in Richard O. Curry and Thomas M. Brown, eds., Conspiracy: The Fear of Subversion in American History (1972), 1–20.
• Carter, Michael S. "A 'Traiterous Religion': indulgences and the anti-Catholic imagination in eighteenth-century New England." Catholic historical review (2013): 52-77 [https://www.jstor.org/stable/23565499 online] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231223072758/https://www.jstor.org/stable/23565499 |date=December 23, 2023 }}.
• Cogliano; Francis D. No King, No Popery: Anti-Catholicism in Revolutionary New England (1995)
• Cuddy, Edward. “The Irish Question and the Revival of Anti-Catholicism in the 1920’s.” Catholic Historical Review 67#2 (1981), pp. 236–55. [http://www.jstor.org/stable/25021080 online] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231223072759/https://www.jstor.org/stable/25021080 |date=December 23, 2023 }}
• Curran, Robert Emmett. Papist Devils: Catholics in British America, 1574–1783 (2014) pp 201–2
• Davis, David Brion. "Some Themes of Counter-subversion: An Analysis of Anti-Masonic, Anti-Catholic and Anti-Mormon Literature", Mississippi Valley Historical Review, 47 (1960), 205–224. [https://www.jstor.org/stable/1891707 in JSTOR] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161105100041/http://www.jstor.org/stable/1891707 |date=November 5, 2016 }}
• Dumenil, Lynn. "The Tribal Twenties: 'Assimilated' Catholics' Response to Anti-Catholicism in the 1920s," Journal of American Ethnic History 1991 11(1): 21–49 [https://www.jstor.org/stable/27500903 online] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220524010541/https://www.jstor.org/stable/27500903 |date=May 24, 2022 }}
• Endres, David J. "Know-Nothings, Nationhood, and the Nuncio: Reassessing the Visit of Archbishop Bedini" U.S. Catholic Historian 21#4 (2003), pp. 1–16 [https://www.researchgate.net/profile/David-Endres/publication/235983148_Know-Nothings_Nationhood_and_the_Nuncio_Reassessing_the_Visit_of_Archbishop_Bedini/links/5dbaea06299bf1a47b033a37/Know-Nothings-Nationhood-and-the-Nuncio-Reassessing-the-Visit-of-Archbishop-Bedini.pdf online] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231223045807/https://www.researchgate.net/profile/David-Endres/publication/235983148_Know-Nothings_Nationhood_and_the_Nuncio_Reassessing_the_Visit_of_Archbishop_Bedini/links/5dbaea06299bf1a47b033a37/Know-Nothings-Nationhood-and-the-Nuncio-Reassessing-the-Visit-of-Archbishop-Bedini.pdf |date=December 23, 2023 }}
• {{Cite book |last=Farrelly |first=Maura Jane |title=Papist Patriots: The Making of an American Catholic Identity |year=2012 |publisher=Oxford University Press |url=https://global.oup.com/academic/product/papist-patriots-9780199757718 |doi=10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199757718.001.0001 |archive-date=January 14, 2024 |access-date=January 14, 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240114065025/https://global.oup.com/academic/product/papist-patriots-9780199757718 |url-status=live }}
• {{Cite book |last=Farrelly |first=Maura Jane |title=Anti-Catholicism in America, 1620–1860 |year=2017 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |url=https://www.cambridge.org/us/universitypress/subjects/history/colonial-american-history/anti-catholicism-america-1620-1860 |doi=10.1017/9781316690932 |archive-date=January 14, 2024 |access-date=January 14, 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240114070527/https://www.cambridge.org/us/universitypress/subjects/history/colonial-american-history/anti-catholicism-america-1620-1860 |url-status=live }}
• Forsell, Gustaf. "Blood, Cross and Flag: The Influence of Race on Ku Klux Klan Theology in the 1920s." Politics, Religion & Ideology 21.3 (2020): 269-287.
• Franchot, Jenny. Roads to Rome : the antebellum Protestant encounter with Catholicism (1994) [https://archive.org/details/roadstoromeanteb0000fran online], includes historians as well as anti-Catholic and pro-Catholic writers
• Greeley, Andrew M. An Ugly Little Secret: Anti-Catholicism in North America (1977) [https://archive.org/details/uglylittlesecret0000gree online].
• Henry, David. "Senator John F. Kennedy Encounters the Religious Question: I Am Not the Catholic Candidate for President." in Contemporary American Public Discourse ed. by H. R. Ryan. (1992). 177–193.
• Hennesey, James. American Catholics: A History of the Roman Catholic Community in the United States (1981),
• Higham; John. Strangers in the Land: Patterns of American Nativism, 1860–1925 1955
• Hinckley, Ted C. "American Anti-Catholicism During the Mexican War" Pacific Historical Review 1962 31(2): 121–137. {{ISSN|0030-8684}}
• Hinds, Sarah. "In Defense of the Faith: The Catholic Response to Anti-Catholicism in Early Nineteenth-Century St. Louis." The Confluence 7.1 (2015): 2+ [https://digitalcommons.lindenwood.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1036&context=confluence_2009 online] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231224073855/https://digitalcommons.lindenwood.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1036&context=confluence_2009 |date=December 24, 2023 }}.
• Hostetler; Michael J. "Gov. Al Smith Confronts the Catholic Question: The Rhetorical Legacy of the 1928 Campaign" Communication Quarterly 46#1 (1998) pp. 12+.
• Ike, Roberto Marie. "Catholic priests and Franklin D. Roosevelt: Analysis of clergy consensus on the New Deal" (PhD dissertation, Saint Louis University; ProQuest Dissertations Publishing, 2000. 3000677).
• Jenkins, Philip. The New Anti-Catholicism: The Last Acceptable Prejudice (Oxford University Press, New ed. 2004). {{ISBN|0-19-517604-9}}
• Jensen, Richard. The Winning of the Midwest: Social and Political Conflict, 1888–1896 (1971) [https://archive.org/details/71JensenWinningofmidwest online]
• [http://tigger.uic.edu/~rjensen/no-irish.htm Jensen, Richard. "'No Irish Need Apply': A Myth of Victimization," Journal of Social History 36.2 (2002) 405–429] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20050208093948/http://tigger.uic.edu/~rjensen/no-irish.htm |date=February 8, 2005 }}
• Jorgenson, Lloyd P. The State and the Non-Public School 1825–1925 (1987), esp. pp. 146–204;
• Keating, Karl. Catholicism and Fundamentalism – The Attack on "Romanism" by "Bible Christians" (Ignatius Press, 1988). {{ISBN|0-89870-177-5}}
• Kenny; Stephen. "Prejudice That Rarely Utters Its Name: A Historiographical and Historical Reflection upon North American Anti-Catholicism." American Review of Canadian Studies. 32#4 (2002). pp : 639+.
• Kinzer, Donald. An Episode in Anti-Catholicism: The American Protective Association (1964), on 1890s [https://archive.org/details/episodeinanticat0000kinz online]
• Lacroix, Patrick. John F. Kennedy and the Politics of Faith. ( University Press of Kansas, 2021).
• Le Beau, Bryan. “ ‘Saving the West from the Pope’: Anti-Catholic Propaganda and the Settlement of the Mississippi River Valley.” American Studies 32#1 (1991), pp. 101–14. [http://www.jstor.org/stable/40642429 online] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231223073356/https://www.jstor.org/stable/40642429 |date=December 23, 2023 }}
• Lessner, Richard Edward. "The Imagined Enemy: American Nativism and the Disciples of Christ, 1830–1925," (PhD diss., Baylor University, 1981).
• Lichtman, Allan J. Prejudice and the Old Politics: The Presidential Election of 1928 (1979) [https://archive.org/details/prejudiceoldpoli0000lich online]
• McGreevy, John T. "Thinking on One's Own: Catholicism in the American Intellectual Imagination, 1928–1960." The Journal of American History, 84 (1997): 97–131.
• Mach, Andrew. " 'The Name of Freeman is Better Than Jesuit': Anti-Catholicism, Republican Ideology, and Cincinnati Political Culture, 1853–1854." Ohio Valley History 15.4 (2015): 3-21.
• Martin, S.J, Martin. "Is Anti-Catholicism The Last Acceptable Prejudice?" America: The Jesuit Review (March 25, 2000) [https://www.americamagazine.org/faith/2000/03/25/anti-catholicism-last-acceptable-prejudice online] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231223075644/https://www.americamagazine.org/faith/2000/03/25/anti-catholicism-last-acceptable-prejudice |date=December 23, 2023 }}
• Moore, Edmund A. A Catholic Runs for President (1956) on Al Smith in 1928. [https://archive.org/details/catholicrunsforp0000moor online].
• Moore, Leonard J. "Historical Interpretations of the 1920s's Klan: The Traditional View and the Populist Revision," Journal of Social History, 24 (Fall 1990): 341–358. [http://www.jstor.org/stable/3787502 online] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231223073610/https://www.jstor.org/stable/3787502 |date=December 23, 2023 }}
• Moran, Katherine D. The Imperial Church: Catholic Founding Fathers and United States Empire. (Cornell University Press, 2020) [https://www.h-net.org/reviews/showrev.php?id=58355 online review] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230209162712/https://www.h-net.org/reviews/showrev.php?id=58355 |date=February 9, 2023 }}.
• Page, David P. "Bishop Michael J. Curley and Anti-Catholic Nativism in Florida," Florida Historical Quarterly 45 (October 1966): 101–117
• Thorp, Willard. Catholic Novelists in Defense of Their Faith, 1829-1865 Proceedings of the American Antiquarian Society (1968) 78#1 pp. 25–117. Covers 50 novels that defended Catholicism. Includes George Henry Miles, Jedediah Vincent Huntington, and Mrs. Mary Anne Sadlier, as well as priest-novelists Charles Constantine Pise, and John Boyce. [https://www.americanantiquarian.org/proceedings/44497950.pdf online] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231223074613/https://www.americanantiquarian.org/proceedings/44497950.pdf |date=December 23, 2023 }}
• Tuska, Benjamin. "Know-Nothingism in Baltimore 1854-1860." Catholic Historical Review 11.2 (1925): 217-251. [https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/25012185.pdf online] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231225084937/https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/25012185.pdf |date=December 25, 2023 }}
• Verhoeven, Timothy. "Transatlantic Connections: American Anti-Catholicism and the First Vatican Council (1869–70)." Catholic Historical Review 100.4 (2014): 695-720. [https://muse.jhu.edu/pub/16/article/575890/summaryexcerpt]
• {{cite book |title=Founding Faith |last=Waldman |first=Steven |year=2009 |isbn=978-0812974744 |publisher=Random House}}
• Wills, Garry. Under God : religion and American politics (1990) [https://archive.org/details/undergodreligion0000will online].
• White, Theodore H. The Making of the President 1960 (1961) [https://archive.org/details/makingofpreside00whit online].

{{refend}}

• Blanshard, Paul. American Freedom and Catholic Power Beacon Press, 1949, an influential attack on the Catholic Church
• Samuel W. Barnum. Romanism as It Is (1872), an anti-Catholic compendium [https://archive.org/details/romanismasitisex00barniala online]
• Rev. Isaac J. Lansing, M.A. Romanism and the Republic: A Discussion of the Purposes, Assumptions, Principles and Methods of the Roman Catholic Hierarchy (1890) [https://archive.org/stream/romanismrepublic00lans/romanismrepublic00lans_djvu.txt Online]
• {{cite book

|title=Heroes of the Fiery Cross

|author=Alma White

|year=1928

|publisher=The Good Citizen

}}

• {{cite book

|title=Klansmen: Guardians of Liberty

|author=Alma White

|year=1926

|publisher=The Good Citizen

}}

• {{cite book

|title=The Ku Klux Klan in Prophecy

|author=Alma White

|year=1925

|publisher=The Good Citizen

}}

• Zacchello, Joseph. Secrets of Romanism. Neptune, N.J.: Loiseaux Brothers, 1948. viii, 222, [2] p. {{ISBN|087213-981-6}} (added to later printings). N.B.: Polemical work by a former priest who became a celebrated radio-evangelist.

{{North America topic |Anti-Catholicism in}}

{{DEFAULTSORT:Anti-Catholicism in the United States}}

Category:History of religion in the United States