Anti-ship missile
{{Short description|Missile used to attack ships}}
{{See also|Anti-ship ballistic missile}}
{{Use British English|date=August 2021}}
File:AGM-84 Harpoon launched from USS Leahy (CG-16).jpg firing from {{USS|Leahy|CG-16|6}} in 1983]]
File:侵犯中華民國航空識別區的轟-6.jpg Strategic bomber armed with YJ-12 supersonic anti-ship cruise missile]]
File:Exocet AM39 P1220892.jpg Exocet anti-ship missile under a Dassault Rafale multirole fighter]]
Image:Jelcz P662D43 z wyrzutnia.JPG's land based Naval Strike Missile coastal defense system launcher and TRS-15M Odra 3D radar in the background]]
An anti-ship missile (AShM{{cite web
| url=https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/RL/RL33153/263
| title= China Naval Modernization: Implications for U.S. Navy Capabilities—Background and Issues for Congress
| author=Ronald O'Rourke
| date=10 November 2022
| publisher=Congressional Research Service
| quote="...a supersonic Anti-Ship Missile (AShM)"
| archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20230705013815/https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/RL/RL33153/263#page18
| archive-date=5 July 2023
| url-status=live
| page=14
| access-date=2024-04-30
}} or ASM){{cite web
| url=https://www.navalnews.com/naval-news/2021/08/will-the-u-s-navy-replace-the-destroyers-harpoon-anti-ship-missiles-with-naval-strike-missiles/
| title=Will The U.S. Navy Replace The Destroyers’ Harpoon Anti-Ship Missiles With Naval Strike Missiles?
| author=Peter Ong
| date=27 August 2021
| publisher=Naval News
| quote="...the aging Harpoon Anti-Ship missiles (ASM)"
| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230528140343/https://www.navalnews.com/naval-news/2021/08/will-the-u-s-navy-replace-the-destroyers-harpoon-anti-ship-missiles-with-naval-strike-missiles/
| archive-date=28 May 2023
| url-status=live
| access-date=2024-04-30
}} is a guided missile that is designed for use against ships and large boats. Most anti-ship missiles are of the sea-skimming variety, and many use a combination of inertial guidance and active radar homing. A large number of other anti-ship missiles use infrared homing to follow the heat that is emitted by a ship; it is also possible for anti-ship missiles to be guided by radio command all the way.
Many anti-ship missiles can be launched from a variety of weapons systems including surface warships (also referred to as ship-to-ship missiles), submarines, bombers, fighter planes, patrol planes, helicopters, shore batteries, land vehicles, and, conceivably, even infantrymen firing shoulder-launched missiles. The term surface-to-surface missile (SSM) is used when appropriate. The longer-range anti-ship missiles are often called anti-ship cruise missiles. Several countries are also developing anti-ship ballistic missiles.
Etymology
File:BrahMos MAKS2009.jpg, a supersonic cruise missile, capable of being launched from multiple platforms.{{Cite web |title=Ship-based Weapon Complex System - BrahMos.com |url=https://www.brahmos.com/content.php?id=15# |access-date=2024-02-24 |website=www.brahmos.com}} ]]
Both "AShM" and "ASM" are utilized interchangeably as an acronym for "anti-ship missile." "AShM" may be the preferred acronym when confusion with "air-to-surface missile" (commonly abbreviated as "ASM") may occur.
History
{{More citations needed|section|date=February 2022}}
During the Cold War, the Soviet Union turned to a sea denial strategy concentrating on submarines, naval mines and the AShM. One of the first products of the decision was the SS-N-2 Styx missile. Further products were to follow, and they were soon loaded onto the Soviet Air Force's Tu-95 Bear and Tu-22 Blinder bombers, in the case of the air-launched KS-1 Komet.
File:Hiddensee P-20 missile.jpg]]
In 1967, the Israeli Navy's destroyer {{INS|Eilat|1955|2}} was the first ship to be sunk by a ship-launched missile—a number of Styx missiles launched by Egyptian {{sclass|Komar|missile boat}}s off the Sinai Peninsula.
In the Indo-Pakistani War of 1971 the Indian Navy conducted two raids using {{sclass2|Osa|missile boat|1}}s employing the Styx on the Pakistani naval base at Karachi. These raids resulted in the destruction or crippling of approximately two thirds of the Pakistani Navy. Major losses included two destroyers, a fleet oiler, an ammunition ship, approximately a dozen merchant ships, and numerous smaller craft. Major shore-based facilities, including fuel storage tanks and naval installations were also destroyed. The Osas returned to base without loss.
The Battle of Latakia in 1973 (during the Yom Kippur/Ramadan War) was the scene of the world's first combat between missile boats. In this battle, the Israeli Navy destroyed Syrian warships without suffering any damage, using electronic countermeasures and ruses for defense. After defeating the Syrian Navy the Israeli missile boats also sank a number of Egyptian warships, again without suffering any damage in return, thus achieving total naval supremacy for the rest of the war.
Anti-ship missiles were used in the 1982 Falklands War. The British warship {{HMS|Sheffield|D80|6}}, a Type 42 destroyer, was struck by a single air-launched Exocet and later sank as a result of the damage. The container ship {{ship||Atlantic Conveyor}} was hit by two Exocets and burnt out and subsequently sank while under tow. {{HMS|Glamorgan|D19|6}} was damaged when she was struck by an MM38, a ship-launched version of the Exocet, fired from a launcher taken from the Argentine Navy destroyer ARA Comodoro Seguí and mounted on a trailer by Navy technicians,{{cite web |url=http://www.fuerzasnavales.com/itb.html |title=An interview with CL (R) Ing. Julio Pérez, chief designer of Exocet trailer-based launcher |language=es |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080302010742/http://www.fuerzasnavales.com/itb.html |archive-date=March 2, 2008 |url-status=dead }} but she had taken evasive action that limited the damage.
File:USS Stark.jpg missiles.]]
In 1987, a US Navy guided-missile frigate, {{USS|Stark|FFG-31|6}}, was hit by an Exocet anti-ship missile fired by an Iraqi Mirage F-1 fighter plane. Stark was damaged, but she was able to steam to a friendly port for temporary repairs.
In October 1987, Sungari, an American-owned tanker steaming under the Liberian flag, and {{MV|Sea Isle City||2}}, a Kuwaiti tanker steaming under the American flag, were hit by Iranian HY-2 missiles.
In 1988 AShMs were fired by both American and Iranian forces in Operation Praying Mantis in the Persian Gulf. During this naval battle, several Iranian warships were hit by American AShMs (and by the US Navy's Standard missiles—surface-to-air missiles which were doing double-duty in the anti-ship role). The US Navy hit the Iranian Navy frigate Sahand with three Harpoon missiles, four AGM-123 Skipper rocket-propelled bombs, a Walleye TV-guided bomb, and several {{convert|1,000|lb|abbr=on|0}} "iron bombs". Despite the large number of munitions and successful hits, Sahand did not sink until fire reached her ammunition magazine, causing it to detonate, sinking the vessel.{{cite web|url=http://www.navybook.com/nohigherhonor/pic-prayingmantis.shtml|title=Photos of Sahand on fire|author=Bradley Peniston|publisher=Navybook.com|access-date=13 November 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120614190554/http://www.navybook.com/nohigherhonor/pic-prayingmantis.shtml|archive-date=14 June 2012|url-status=dead}} In the same engagement, American warships fired three Standard missiles at an Iranian Navy corvette. This corvette had such a low profile above the water that a Harpoon missile that arrived several minutes later could not lock onto it with its targeting radars.
In 2006, Lebanese Hezbollah fighters fired an AShM at the Israeli corvette {{INS|Hanit}}, inflicting battle damage, but the warship managed to return to Israel in one piece and under its own power. A second missile in the same salvo struck and sank an Egyptian merchant ship.
File:Neptune R-360 missile, Kyiv 2021, 05.jpg]]
On 13 April 2022, the Ukrainian government claimed to have hit the Russian cruiser Moskva with two R-360 Neptune missiles, resulting in its sinking. The Russian government did not confirm the attack, but admitted that the ship sank after a fire.{{cite news |publisher=BBC News |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-61114843 |access-date=15 April 2022 |date=15 April 2022 |title=Russian warship: Moskva sinks in Black Sea}} If Ukrainian claims are true, Moskva might be the largest warship ever disabled or destroyed by a missile, according to Carl Schuster, a retired US Navy captain and former director of operations at the US Pacific Command's Joint Intelligence Center.{{cite news |last1=Lendon |first1=Brad |title=Russian navy evacuates badly damaged flagship in Black Sea. Ukraine claims it was hit by a missile |url=https://www.cnn.com/2022/04/14/europe/russia-navy-cruiser-moskva-fire-abandoned-intl-hnk-ml/index.html |publisher=CNN |date=14 April 2022 |access-date=14 April 2022 |archive-date=14 April 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220414164050/https://www.cnn.com/2022/04/14/europe/russia-navy-cruiser-moskva-fire-abandoned-intl-hnk-ml/index.html |url-status=live }}
Threat posed
{{More citations needed|section|date=February 2022}}
File:Ракетный удар гвардейского ракетного крейсера «Варяг» и поражение судна-мишени класса «крейсер».ogv missile destroying a target ship]]
Anti-ship missiles are a significant threat to surface ships, which have large radar, radio, and thermal signatures that are difficult to suppress. Once acquired, a ship cannot outrun or out-turn a missile, the warhead of which can inflict significant damage. To counter the threat posed, the modern surface combatant has to either avoid being detected, destroy the missile launch platform before it fires its missiles, or decoy or destroy all of the incoming missiles.
Modern navies have spent much time and effort developing counters to the threat of anti-ship missiles since the Second World War. Anti-ship missiles have been the driving force behind many aspects of modern ship design, especially in navies that operate aircraft carriers.
The first layer of antimissile defense by a modern, fully equipped aircraft carrier task force is always the long-range missile-carrying fighter planes of the aircraft carrier itself. Several fighters are kept on combat air patrol (CAP) 24 hours a day, seven days a week when at sea, and many more are put aloft when the situation warrants, such as during wartime or when a threat to the task force is detected.
File:Mansup (13-09-2024).gif firing a MANSUP anti-ship missile in September 2024]]
These fighters patrol up to hundreds of miles away from the task force and they are equipped with airborne radar systems. When spotting an approaching aircraft on a threatening flight profile, it is the responsibility of the CAP to intercept it before any missile is launched. If this cannot be achieved in time, the missiles themselves can be targeted by the fighters's own weapons systems, usually their air-to-air missiles, but in extremis, by their rapid-fire cannon.
However, some AShMs might "leak" past the task force's fighter defenses. In addition, many modern warships operate independently of carrier-based air protection and they must provide their own defenses against missiles and aircraft. Under these circumstances, the ships themselves must utilize multilayered defenses which have been built into them.
For example, some warships, such as the US Navy's {{sclass|Ticonderoga|cruiser|0}} guided missile cruisers, the {{sclass|Arleigh Burke|destroyer|0}} guided missile destroyers, and the Royal Navy's Type 45 guided missile destroyer, use a combination of radar systems, integrated computer fire-control systems, and agile surface-to-air missiles (SAM) to simultaneously track, engage, and destroy several incoming anti-ship missiles or hostile warplanes at a time.
The primary American defensive system, called the Aegis Combat System, is also used by the navies of Japan, Spain, Norway, South Korea, and Australia. The Aegis system has been designed to defend against mass attacks by hostile anti-ship missiles or warplanes.
Any missiles that can elude the interception by medium-ranges SAM missiles can then be either deceived with electronic countermeasures or decoys; shot down by short-range missiles such as the Sea Sparrow or the Rolling Airframe Missile (RAM); engaged by the warship's main gun armament (if present); or, as a last resort, destroyed by a close-in weapon system (CIWS), such as the American Phalanx CIWS, Russian Kashtan CIWS, or the Dutch Goalkeeper CIWS.
=Current threats and vulnerabilities=
File:Khalij Fars (“Persian Gulf”) ballistic missile.jpg anti-ship ballistic missile]]
To counter these defense systems, countries such as Russia are developing or deploying missiles that slowly cruise at a very low level (about five meters above sea level) to within a short range of their target and then, at the point when radar detection becomes inevitable, initiate a supersonic, high-agility sprint (potentially with anti-aircraft missile detection and evasion) to close the terminal distance. Missiles, such as the SS-N-27 Sizzler, that incorporate this sort of threat modality are regarded by US Navy analysts as potentially being able to penetrate the US Navy's defensive systems.{{cite web|url=https://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601070&sid=a5LkaU0wj714&refer=home|title=Navy Lacks Plan to Defend Against 'Sizzler' Missile|publisher=Bloomberg|access-date=13 November 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071119102801/http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601070&sid=a5LkaU0wj714&refer=home|archive-date=19 November 2007|url-status=live}}
Recent years have seen a growing amount of attention being paid to the possibility of ballistic missiles being re-purposed or designed for an anti-ship role. Speculation has focused on the development of such missiles for use by China's People's Liberation Army Navy. Such an anti-ship ballistic missile would approach its target extremely rapidly, making it very difficult to intercept.{{cite web|url=http://www.defensereview.com/chinese-anti-ship-ballistic-missile-asbm-kill-weapon-flummoxes-us-navy/|title=Chinese Anti-Ship Ballistic Missile (ASBM) 'Kill Weapon' Flummoxes U.S. Navy|author=David Crane|date=6 April 2009|publisher=DefenseReview.com (DR): An online tactical technology and military defense technology magazine with particular focus on the latest and greatest tactical firearms news (tactical gun news), tactical gear news and tactical shooting news.|access-date=13 November 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141113185848/http://www.defensereview.com/chinese-anti-ship-ballistic-missile-asbm-kill-weapon-flummoxes-us-navy/|archive-date=13 November 2014|url-status=live}} In response to China's development of anti-ship missiles and other anti-access/area denial capabilities, the United States has developed the AirSea Battle doctrine.
Countermeasures and defenses
{{More citations needed|section|date=February 2022}}
{{See also|Countermeasure}}
File:USS John Paul Jones (DDG-53) launches RIM-174 June 2014.JPG surface-to-air missile used to counter anti-ship missile threats. The missile can also used as an anti-ship missile for Secondary role.]]
File:9M317M surface-to-air-missiles.webm surface-to-air-missile launching from vertical launching system]]
Image:AN-SLQ-32 Electronic Warfare Suite on USS CG-70 Lake Erie at Osaka (2014 April 13).jpg aboard USS Lake Erie.]]
Countermeasures against anti-ship missiles include
- Surface-to-air missiles
- Close-in weapon systems (CIWS), including the Soviet-or Russian-made AK-630 or Kashtan, Turkish Aselsan GOKDENIZ, German Millennium Gun or the Phalanx and Goalkeeper. These are automated gun systems mounted on the deck of a ship that use radar to track the approaching missile, and then attempt to shoot it down during its final approach to the target.
- Anti-aircraft guns such as the 5-54 Mark 45 or the AK-130
- Electronic warfare equipment (such as AN/SLQ-32 Electronic Warfare Suite)
- Decoy systems (such as chaff, the US Navy's Mark 36 SRBOC system), and flares, or more active decoys such as the Nulka
Ships that employ some stealth technology can reduce the risk of detection and make themselves a harder target for the missile through the use of passive countermeasures including:
- reduction of their radar cross section (RCS) and hence radar signature.
- limiting the ship's infrared and acoustic signature.
=History of combat interceptions=
==Gulf War==
On February 25, 1991, during the first Gulf War, the Phalanx-equipped {{USS|Jarrett|FFG-33|6}} was a few miles from {{USS|Missouri|BB-63|6}} and the destroyer {{HMS|Gloucester|D96|6}}. The ships were attacked by an Iraqi Silkworm missile (often referred to as the Seersucker), at which Missouri fired its SRBOC chaff. The Phalanx system on Jarrett, operating in the automatic target-acquisition mode, fixed upon Missouri{{'}}s chaff, releasing a burst of rounds. From this burst, four rounds hit Missouri which was {{convert|2|to|3|mi|km|spell=in}} from Jarrett at the time. There were no injuries.{{cite web|url=http://www.gulflink.osd.mil/du_ii/du_ii_tabh.htm |title=Tab-H Friendly-fire Incidents |publisher=Gulflink.osd.mil |access-date=2010-04-13| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100408060501/http://www.gulflink.osd.mil/du_ii/du_ii_tabh.htm| archive-date=8 April 2010 | url-status=live}} A Sea Dart missile was then launched from HMS Gloucester, which destroyed the Iraqi missile, achieving the first successful engagement of a missile by a missile during combat at sea.
==2016 attacks off the coast of Yemen==
On 9 October 2016, {{USS|Mason|DDG-87|2}}, operating near the Bab-el-Mandeb strait, was targeted by two missiles fired from Houthi-controlled territory. Both missiles fell short and crashed into the water.{{cite web |url= https://www.cnbc.com/2016/10/09/us-navy-ship-uss-mason-targeted-in-failed-missile-attack-from-yemen.html |title=US Navy ship targeted in failed missile attack from Yemen |website=CNBC|date=9 October 2016 |access-date=9 October 2016}}{{cite news|url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-10-10/missiles-fired-from-yemen-target-u-s-navy-ship-in-failed-attack|title=Missiles Fired From Yemen Target U.S. Navy Ship in Failed Attack|publisher=Bloomberg|date=10 October 2016|access-date=10 October 2016}} The Houthi insurgency denied launching the attack on the warship.{{Cite news|url=http://www.cnn.com/2016/10/10/politics/yemen-us-navy-targeted/|title=Yemen: Missiles target U.S. warship, Pentagon says|last1=Browne|first1=Ryan|last2=Crawford|first2=Jamie|date=10 October 2016|publisher=CNN|access-date=10 October 2016}} The United States Naval Institute reported that Mason fired two SM-2 Standard missiles and one RIM-162 ESSM missile to intercept the two missiles, and deployed her Nulka missile decoy. One of two U.S. defense officials cited anonymously added that it was not clear whether the incoming missiles had been shot down or crashed into the water on their own.{{cite web|url=https://news.usni.org/2016/10/11/uss-mason-fired-3-missiles-to-defend-from-yemen-cruise-missiles-attack|title=USS Mason Fired 3 Missiles to Defend From Yemen Cruise Missiles Attack|last=LaGrone|first=Sam|website=USNI News|publisher=U.S. Naval Institute|date=11 October 2016|access-date=12 October 2016}} This marked the first recorded instance of ship-based anti-air missiles being fired from vertical launching cells in combat in response to an actual inbound missile threat.{{cite web |title=U.S. Navy Successfully Thwarts Attack With First Engagement of Missile Defense System |url=http://foxtrotalpha.jalopnik.com/u-s-navy-successfully-thwarts-attack-with-first-engage-1787678550 |publisher=Foxtrot Alpha |date=11 October 2016 |access-date=13 October 2016}}
On 12 October 2016 {{USS|Mason|DDG-87|2}} was again targeted by missiles fired from Yemeni territory, while it was operating in the Bab el-Mandeb strait.{{Cite web|url=https://news.usni.org/2016/10/12/pentagon-respond-appropriate-manner-new-missile-attack-uss-mason-yemen|title=Pentagon Pledges to Respond in 'Appropriate Manner' After New Yemen Missile Attack on USS Mason|last=LaGrone|first=Sam|date=12 October 2016|website=USNI News|publisher=U.S. Naval Institute|access-date=12 October 2016}} Mason was not hit by the two missiles, which were fired from near the southern Yemen city of Al Hudaydah. While the Navy was not certain whether the first incoming missile was intercepted or instead just fell into the sea, officials said Mason successfully intercepted the second missile at a distance of about {{convert|8|mi}},{{cite web|url=http://www.stripes.com/news/aegis-defense-system-helped-stop-missile-attack-on-uss-mason-1.433974|title=Aegis defense system helped stop missile attack on USS Mason|last=Copp|first=Tara|publisher=Stars and Stripes|date=13 October 2016|access-date=15 October 2016}} marking the first time in history a warship destroyed an inbound anti-ship missile with a SAM in actual self-defense. On 13 October 2016, the U.S. attacked three radar sites in Houthi-held territory which had been involved in the earlier missile attacks, with cruise missiles launched from Nitze.{{cite web|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-yemen-security-missiles-idUSKCN12C294|title=U.S. military strikes Yemen after missile attacks on U.S. Navy ship|last=Stewart|first=Phil|publisher=Reuters|date=12 October 2016|access-date=12 October 2016}} The Pentagon assessed that all three sites were destroyed.{{cite news|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-37639565|title=Yemen conflict: U.S. strikes radar sites after missile attack on ship|work=BBC News|date=13 October 2016|access-date=13 October 2016}}
On 15 October 2016, {{USS|Mason|DDG-87|2}} was targeted in a third attack by Houthi rebels based in Yemen, by five anti-ship cruise missiles while operating in the Red Sea north of the Bab el-Mandeb strait. Mason fired a radar decoy, an infrared decoy, and several SM-2 Standard missiles in response, either neutralizing or intercepting four of the five incoming missiles. The Navy reported the fifth incoming missile as neutralized by a radar decoy launched from Nitze, after Mason alerted her to the threat.{{Cite web|url=https://www.navytimes.com/news/your-navy/2017/11/03/four-ship-crews-receive-combat-action-ribbon|title=Four ship crews receive Combat Action Ribbon |last=Ziezulewicz|first=Geoff|date=3 November 2017|website=Navy Times|access-date=10 November 2017}}
==2023 Houthi missile attacks==
On 26 December 2023, the USS Laboon shot down three ASBMs in the Red Sea fired by Houthi rebels with multiple SM-6s. This was its first intercept of a ballistic missile in combat.{{cite news|url=https://www.military.com/daily-news/2023/12/26/navy-defends-against-17-houthi-attacks-red-sea-shipping-over-just-10-hour-period.html|title="Massive One-Day Barrage of Houthi Attacks on Shipping Fended Off by Navy Destroyer, Fighter"|first1=Konstantin|last1=Toropin|date=December 26, 2023|work=Military.com}}
On 30 December 2023, Danish container ship Maersk Hangzhou issued a distress call after coming under fire from four small ships commanded by Iranian-backed Houthi rebels from Yemen. Attempts were also made to board Maersk Hangzhou by force, while a contracted security team defended the ship. {{USS|Gravely|DDG-107|2}} and aircraft carrier {{USS|Dwight D. Eisenhower|CVN-69|2}} responded to a distress call from the container ship. Verbal commands were radioed to the Houthi ships, while helicopters from Eisenhower were dispatched. After taking small arms fire, U.S. Navy helicopters returned fire, sinking three of the four Houthi ships. There was no damage to U.S. equipment or personnel. In the process of responding to the distress call, Gravely shot down two anti-ship ballistic missiles fired from Yemen.{{cite web |url= https://twitter.com/CENTCOM/status/1741381969936834951 |title= Iranian-backed Houthi small boats attack merchant vessel and U.S. Navy helicopters in Southern Red Sea |author= US Central Command |date= 31 December 2023 |website= X (formerly Twitter)}}{{cite web | last=Tanyos | first=Faris | title=Missile fired from Houthi-controlled Yemen strikes merchant vessel in Red Sea, Pentagon says | website=CBS News | date=30 December 2023 | url=https://www.cbsnews.com/news/missile-from-houthi-controlled-yemen-strikes-merchant-vessel-red-sea-uss-gravely-shoots-down-anti-ship-missiles/ | access-date=31 December 2023}}
On Jan. 9, at approximately 9:15 p.m. (Sanaa time), Iranian-backed Houthis launched a complex attack of Iranian designed one-way attack UAVs (OWA UAVs), anti-ship cruise missiles, and an anti-ship ballistic missile from Houthi-controlled areas of Yemen into the Southern Red Sea, towards international shipping lanes where dozens of merchant vessels were transiting. Eighteen OWA UAVs, two anti-ship cruise missiles, and one anti-ship ballistic missile were shot down by a combined effort of F/A-18s from {{USS|Dwight D. Eisenhower|CVN-69|2}}, {{USS|Gravely|DDG-107|2}}, USS Laboon (DDG 58), USS {{USS|Mason|DDG-87|2}}, and the United Kingdom’s {{HMS|Diamond}}. This is the 26th Houthi attack on commercial shipping lanes in the Red Sea since Nov. 19. There were no injuries or damage reported.{{Cite news |title=US CENTCOM Statement on 26th Houthi attack on commercial shipping lanes in the Red Sea |url=https://www.centcom.mil/MEDIA/STATEMENTS/Statements-View/Article/3639970/us-centcom-statement-on-26th-houthi-attack-on-commercial-shipping-lanes-in-the/}}{{Source-attribution}}
On 14 January 2024, an anti-ship missile was fired in the direction of Laboon from a Houthi-controlled portion of Yemen, according to CENTCOM.{{cite news |last1=Gambrell |first1=Jon |title=Yemen Houthi rebels fire missile at US warship in Red Sea in first attack after American-led strikes|url=https://apnews.com/article/houthis-us-yemen-israel-palestinians-gaza-fa2aefc86ae002e73081e6ac1b772610 |access-date=14 January 2024 |website=AP News |publisher=Associated Press |date=14 January 2024}} Two weeks later, on 30 January 2024, the USS Carney shot down an ASBM in the Gulf of Aden fired by Houthi rebels with an SM-6.{{cite news|url=https://www.twz.com/sea/navys-sm-6-missile-used-in-combat-report |title="Navy's SM-6 Missile Used In Combat: Report"|first1=Thomas| last1=Newdick|first2=Joseph|last2=Trevithick|date=February 1, 2024|work=The War Zone}}
On 30 January 2024, USS Gravely used its Phalanx CIWS to shoot down an incoming anti-ship cruise missile fired by the Houthis. U.S. officials said that the missile came within a mile of the destroyer.{{Cite web |last1=Liebermann |first1=Oren |last2=Bertrand |first2=Natasha |date=31 January 2024 |title=US warship had close call with Houthi missile in Red Sea |url=https://www.cnn.com/2024/01/31/politics/us-warship-close-call-houthi-missile/index.html |access-date=31 January 2024 |website=CNN}} No damage or injuries were reported.{{Cite web |last1=Sherman |first1=Ella |last2=Epstein |first2=Jake |date=31 January 2024 |title=A Houthi missile got so close to a US destroyer the warship turned to a last resort gun system to shoot it down: report |url=https://www.businessinsider.com/houthi-missile-close-us-warship-close-in-weapon-system-2024-1 |access-date=31 January 2024 |website=Business Insider}}
On February 6, 2024 at 4:30 p.m., while patrolling in the Gulf of Aden, USS Laboon (DDG 58), operating near M/V Star Nasia, intercepted and shot down an anti-ship ballistic missile fired by the Iranian-backed Houthis.{{cite news |title=Iranian-Backed Houthi Terrorists conduct Multiple Anti-Ship Ballistic Missile Attacks in the Southern Red Sea and Gulf of Aden|url=https://www.centcom.mil/MEDIA/PRESS-RELEASES/Press-Release-View/Article/3668425/iranian-backed-houthi-terrorists-conduct-multiple-anti-ship-ballistic-missile-a/}} Later in the month, on 20 February 2024 at 12:30 a.m., while operating in the Gulf of Aden, Laboon detected and shot down one anti-ship cruise missile fired by the Houthis.{{cite news |title=Feb. 19 and early morning Feb. 20 Red Sea Update |url=https://www.centcom.mil/MEDIA/PRESS-RELEASES/Press-Release-View/Article/3681040/feb-19-and-early-morning-feb-20-red-sea-update/ |access-date=12 April 2024 |publisher=U.S. Central Command |date=20 February 2024}}
Comparison
{{more citations needed section|date=February 2025}}
{{See also|List of anti-ship missiles}}
class="wikitable sortable" style="text-align: center" | ||||||||||
Name
!Year ! data-sort-type="number" | Weight ! data-sort-type="number" | Warhead ! data-sort-type="number" | Range ! data-sort-type="number" | Speed !Propulsion !Launch platform !Guidance !Force !Comments | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Zircon{{cite web|url=http://rg.ru/2015/10/26/reg-szfo/raketa-anons.html|title=Крейсер "Адмирал Нахимов" получит гиперзвуковые ракеты|date=26 October 2015|access-date=31 January 2016|language=ru|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160307230620/http://rg.ru/2015/10/26/reg-szfo/raketa-anons.html|archive-date=7 March 2016|url-status=live}} | Expected for (2018-{{cite news|url=https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/royal-navy-new-queen-elizabeth-class-aircraft-carriers-not-stop-russia-zircon-missiles-hypersonic-a7651781.html|title=Russia has created an 'unstoppable' 4,600mph missile|date=27 March 2017|access-date=19 September 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170929092156/http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/royal-navy-new-queen-elizabeth-class-aircraft-carriers-not-stop-russia-zircon-missiles-hypersonic-a7651781.html|archive-date=29 September 2017|url-status=live}} 2020){{cite web|url=http://tass.ru/en/defense/870751|access-date=2016-05-13|title=Russia's hypersonic Zircon missile to go into serial production in 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160523204745/http://tass.ru/en/defense/870751|archive-date=2016-05-23|url-status=live}} | Size 4 pcs instead of 1 P-700 for 1 launcher | {{cvt|300 | |||||||
400|kg|lb|disp=br()}} conventional or nuclear | {{cvt|400|km|nmi |disp=br()}} (export) >{{cvt|1000|km|nmi |disp=br()}} (domestic){{cite web|url=http://www.vesti.ru/doc.html?id=2732278|title=Для гиперзвуковых крылатых ракет в России создано принципиально новое топливо|website=vesti.ru|access-date=2017-05-25|language=ru|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170529064513/http://www.vesti.ru/doc.html?id=2732278|archive-date=2017-05-29|url-status=live}} | Minimum 4700 km/h (Mach 5 to 6) potentially up to Mach 8 {{cite web|url=http://www.vesti.ru/doc.html?id=2877959|title=На испытаниях российская ракета "Циркон" достигла восьми скоростей звука|website=vesti.ru|access-date=2017-04-15|language=ru|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170415204539/http://www.vesti.ru/doc.html?id=2877959|archive-date=2017-04-15|url-status=live}} | Liquid fuel scramjet | Surface, submarine | {{dunno}} | Russia | ||||
3M-54E Klub (SS-N-27 "Sizzler") | 2006 | {{cvt|2300|kg|lb|disp=br()}} | {{cvt|200|kg|lb|disp=br()}} | {{cvt|220|km|nmi |disp=br()}} | 0.8 M, 2.5/2.9M | Turbojet | Surface, sub, shipping container | Inertial, active radar | Russia | |
3M-54E1 Klub (SS-N-27 "Sizzler") | 2006 | {{cvt|1780|kg|lb|disp=br()}} | {{cvt|400|kg|lb|disp=br()}} | {{cvt|300|km|nmi |disp=br()}} | 0.8 M, 2.5/2.9M | Turbojet | Surface, sub, shipping container | Inertial, active radar | Russia | |
3M-54 Kalibr (SS-N-27 "Sizzler") | 1993 | {{cvt|1300|kg|lb|disp=br()}} | {{cvt|200|kg|lb|disp=br()}} | {{cvt|660|km|nmi |disp=br()}} | 0.8 M, 2.5/2.9M | Turbojet | Surface, sub, shipping container | Inertial, active radar | Russia | Used in combat |
P-1000 Vulkan | 1987 | {{cvt|6300|kg|lb|disp=br()}} | {{cvt|500|kg|lb|disp=br()}} | 700 and 1000 (appx.) km (or 800 km{{cite web |url=http://tvzvezda.ru/news/forces/content/201601050731-ddon.htm |title=Никому в мире и не снилось: почему ракете "Вулкан" до сих пор нет равных на планете |publisher=Tvzvezda.ru |date=2018-01-01 |access-date=2018-11-21 |language=ru |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180916235505/https://tvzvezda.ru/news/forces/content/201601050731-ddon.htm |archive-date=2018-09-16 |url-status=live }}) | {{cvt|3825|km/h|kn}} | Solid-fuel ramjet | Surface | Inertial, active radar homing/anti radar, mid course correction | USSR/Russia | |
P-800 Oniks (SS-N-26) | 2002 | {{cvt|3000|kg|lb|disp=br()}} | {{cvt|250|kg|lb|disp=br()}} | {{cvt|800|km|nmi |disp=br()}} (Oniks-M) {{cvt|600|km|nmi}} (Domestic version for Russia) | {{cvt|3600|km/h|kn}} | Ramjet | Surface, air | Active-passive, radar | Russia | |
P-700 Granit | 1983 | {{cvt|7000|kg|lb|disp=br()}} | {{cvt|750|kg|lb|disp=br()}} | {{cvt|625|km|nmi |disp=br()}} | {{cvt|2550|km/h|kn}} | Solid-fuel ramjet | Surface | Inertial, active radar homing/anti radar, mid course correction | USSR/Russia | |
P-500 Bazalt (SS-N-12 SANDBOX) | 1975 | {{cvt|4500|kg|lb|disp=br()}} | 1000 kg / 350 kt nuclear | {{cvt|550|km|nmi |disp=br()}} | {{cvt|3060|km/h|kn}} | Liquid fuel rocket | Surface, submarine | Semi-active, terminal active radar | USSR | |
P-270 Moskit (SS-N-22 SUNBURN) | 1984 | {{cvt|4500|kg|lb|disp=br()}} | {{cvt|320|kg|lb|disp=br()}} | {{cvt|120|km|nmi |disp=br()}} | {{cvt|3600|km/h|kn}} | Ramjet | Surface, air | Active radar, infrarred | USSR | |
P-120 Malakhit (SS-N-9 SIREN) | 1972 | {{cvt|2953|kg|lb|disp=br()}} | {{cvt|500|kg|lb|disp=br()}} | {{cvt|110|km|nmi |disp=br()}} | Mach 0.9 | Turbojet, solid fuel | Surface | Inertial, mid course correction, active radar | USSR | Used in combat |
P-70 Ametist (SS-N-7 STARBRIGHT) | 1967 | {{cvt|3500|kg|lb|disp=br()}} | {{cvt|500|kg|lb|disp=br()}} | {{cvt|65|km|nmi |disp=br()}} | {{cvt|1050|km/h|kn}} | Solid rocket | Sub | Inertial, terminal homing | USSR | |
P-15 Termit (SS-N-2 STYX) | 1960 | {{cvt|3100|kg|lb|disp=br()}} | {{cvt|454|kg|lb|disp=br()}} | {{cvt|80|km|nmi |disp=br()}} | {{cvt|1100|km/h|kn}} | Liquid fuel rocket | Surface | Active radar, infrarred | USSR | Used in combat |
P-5 Pyatyorka (SS-N-3 "Shaddock") | 1959 | {{cvt|5000|kg|lb|disp=br()}} | {{cvt|1000|kg|lb|disp=br()}} | {{cvt|750|km|nmi |disp=br()}} | {{cvt|1000|km/h|kn}} | Turbojet | Surface | Inertial, mid course correction, active radar | USSR | |
Kh-15 (AS-16 Kickback) | 1980 | {{cvt|1200|kg|lb|disp=br()}} | 150 kg conventional/nuclear | {{cvt|300|km|nmi |disp=br()}} | {{cvt|6125|km/h|kn}} | Solid-fuel rocket | Air | Inertial/Active radar | USSR/Russia | |
Kh-35 (AS-20 KAYAK) | 2003 | {{cvt|520|kg|lb|disp=br()}} | {{cvt|145|kg|lb|disp=br()}} | {{cvt|130|km|nmi |disp=br()}} | {{cvt|970|km/h|kn}} | Turbofan | Surface, air | Inertial, active radar | USSR/Russia/North Korea | |
Kh-22 (AS-4 Kitchen) | 1968 | {{cvt|5820|kg|lb|disp=br()}} | 1000 kg conventional/nuclear | {{cvt|400|km|nmi |disp=br()}} | {{cvt|4000|km/h|kn}} | Liquid-fuel rocket | Air | Inertial | USSR/Russia | |
KSShch (SS-N-1 "Scrubber") | 1958 | {{cvt|2300|kg|lb|disp=br()}} | Nuclear | {{cvt|40|km|nmi |disp=br()}} | {{cvt|1150|km/h|kn}} | Liquid-fuel rocket | Surface | Inertial | USSR | |
SM-6 | 2013 | {{cvt|1500|kg|lb|disp=br()}} | {{cvt|64|kg|lb|disp=br()}} | {{cvt|370|km|nmi|disp=br()}} | {{cvt|4287.7|km/h|kn}} | two stage/solid rocket booster | surface ships, transporter erector launcher | Inertial guidance, active radar homing, semi active radar homing | United States | (The anti-ship version will enter service in 2023.) |
AGM-158C LRASM | 2013{{cite web|url=http://www.deagel.com/Anti-Ship-Missiles/LRASM_a002407001.aspx|access-date=2010-11-14|title=LRASM / Long Range Anti-Ship Missile|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101206042717/http://www.deagel.com/Anti-Ship-Missiles/LRASM_a002407001.aspx|archive-date=2010-12-06|url-status=live}} / 2018{{cite web|url=http://aviationweek.com/defense/arming-new-platforms-will-push-value-missiles-market|access-date=2016-05-13|title=Arming New Platforms Will Push Up Value Of Missiles Market|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160410051620/http://aviationweek.com/defense/arming-new-platforms-will-push-value-missiles-market|archive-date=2016-04-10|url-status=live}} | ~900 kg | 450 kg | {{cvt|370 | ||||||
560|km|nmi|disp=br()}}{{cite web|url=https://www.flightglobal.com/about-us/blogs-announcement/|title=About the FlightGlobal Group - Blogs Announcement - flightglobal.com|website=Flightglobal.com|access-date=2018-04-13|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180415133952/https://www.flightglobal.com/about-us/blogs-announcement/|archive-date=2018-04-15|url-status=live}}{{cite web |url=http://www.ainonline.com/aviation-news/defense/2015-12-15/us-navys-new-anti-ship-missile-makes-progress |title=US Navy's New Anti-Ship Missile Makes Progress |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180414010702/https://www.ainonline.com/aviation-news/defense/2015-12-15/us-navys-new-anti-ship-missile-makes-progress |archive-date=2018-04-14 |url-status=dead |website=Ainonline.com |date=15 December 2015}}{{cite web |url=http://breakingdefense.com/2016/11/a-bridgehead-too-far-csbas-aggressive-risky-strategy-for-marines/ |title=A Bridgehead Too Far? CSBA's Aggressive, risky Strategy For Marines |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180414011026/https://breakingdefense.com/2016/11/a-bridgehead-too-far-csbas-aggressive-risky-strategy-for-marines/ |archive-date=2018-04-14 |url-status=dead |website=Breakingdefense.com |date=15 November 2016}} | High subsonic | Turbojet | Air, ship | Passive radar and infrared homing | United States | |||||
AGM-123 Skipper II | 1985 | {{cvt|582|kg|lb|disp=br()}} | {{cvt|450|kg|lb|disp=br()}} | {{cvt|25|km|nmi |disp=br()}} | {{cvt|1100|km/h|kn}} | Solid-fueled | Air | Laser-guided | United States | Used in combat |
BGM-109 Tomahawk | 1983 | {{cvt|1200|kg|lb|disp=br()}} | {{cvt|450|kg|lb|disp=br()}} | {{cvt|1666|km|nmi |disp=br()}} (Block V) {{Cite web|url=https://www.defensenews.com/naval/2021/03/17/us-navy-set-to-take-delivery-of-the-latest-version-of-its-tomahawk-missile/|title=US Navy set to receive latest version of the Tomahawk missile|date=17 March 2021}} | {{cvt|880|km/h|kn}} | Turbofan | Air, surface, submarine | GPS, TERCOM, DSMAC | United States | (Previous anti-ship version withdrawn from service in 1994, new anti-ship version will enter service in 2023.) |
Harpoon | 1977 | {{cvt|691|kg|lb|disp=br()}} | {{cvt|221|kg|lb|disp=br()}} | {{cvt|280|km|nmi |disp=br()}} | {{cvt|864|km/h|kn}} | Turbojet engine | Air, surface, submarine | Radar (B3: midcourse update) | United States | Used in combat |
AGM-65F Maverick | 1972 | {{cvt|300|kg|lb|disp=br()}} | {{cvt|140|kg|lb|disp=br()}} | {{cvt|30|km|nmi |disp=br()}} | {{cvt|1,150|km/h|kn}} | Solid propellant | Air | Laser, infrarred | United States | Used in combat |
Bat | 1944 | {{cvt|1000|kg|lb|disp=br()}} | {{cvt|727|kg|lb|disp=br()}} | {{cvt|37|km|nmi |disp=br()}} | {{cvt|260|–|390|km/h|kn}} | None | Air | Active radar | United States | Used in combat |
MMP | 2017 | {{cvt|15|kg|lb|disp=br()}} | {{dunno}} | {{cvt|5|km|nmi|disp=br()}} | {{dunno}} | Solid propellant | Surface | Infrared | France | |
ANL/Sea Venom | 2017 | 120 kg
(260 lb) |{{cvt|30|kg|lb|disp=br()}} | {{cvt|20|km|nmi|disp=br()}} | {{cvt|1040.4|km/h|kn}}) | Two-stage solid-propellant rocket motor | Air (helicopter), Surface | Infrared | France/United Kingdom | ||
AS.34 Kormoran | 1991 | {{cvt|630|kg|lb|disp=br()}} | {{cvt|220|kg|lb|disp=br()}} | {{cvt|35|km|nmi |disp=br()}} | {{cvt|1101|km/h|kn}} | Rocket | Air | Inertial, active radar | France/Germany | |
AS.15TT/MM.15 | 1985 | {{cvt|96|kg|lb|disp=br()}} | {{cvt|30|kg|lb|disp=br()}} | {{cvt|15|km|nmi |disp=br()}} | {{cvt|1008|km/h|kn}} | Solid propellant | Air | Inertial | France | |
ARMAT | 1984 | {{cvt|550|kg|lb|disp=br()}} | {{cvt|160|kg|lb|disp=br()}} | {{cvt|120|km|nmi |disp=br()}} | {{cvt|1100|km/h|kn}} | Solid propellant | Air | Passive radar | France | |
Otomat/Milas | 1977 | {{cvt|770|kg|lb|disp=br()}} | {{cvt|210|kg|lb|disp=br()}} | {{cvt|360|km|nmi |disp=br()}} (min.) | {{cvt|1116|km/h|kn}} | Turbojet | Surface, air | Inertial, GPS, active radar | France/Italy | |
Exocet | 1975 | {{cvt|670|kg|lb|disp=br()}} | {{cvt|165|kg|lb|disp=br()}} | {{cvt|180|km|nmi |disp=br()}} | {{cvt|1134|km/h|kn}} | Solid propellant (Block 1, block 2), turbojet (Block 3) | Air, surface, submarine | Inertial, active radar | France | Used in combat |
AS.37/AJ.168 Martel | 1970 | {{cvt|550|kg|lb|disp=br()}} | {{cvt|150|kg|lb|disp=br()}} | {{cvt|60|km|nmi |disp=br()}} | {{cvt|1070|km/h|kn}} | Solid propellant | Air | Passive radar, TV | France/United Kingdom | Used in combat |
Malafon | 1966 | {{cvt|1330|kg|lb|disp=br()}} | {{dunno}} | {{cvt|13|km|nmi|disp=br()}} | {{cvt|808|km/h|kn}} | Solid propellant | Ship, surface | MCLOS (radio link) | France | |
SS.12/AS.12 | 1960 | {{cvt|76|kg|lb|disp=br()}} | {{cvt|28|kg|lb|disp=br()}} | {{cvt|7|km|nmi |disp=br()}} | {{cvt|370|km/h|kn}} | Solid-fueled | Air, surface | Wire-guided MCLOS | France | Used in combat |
Malaface | 1954 | {{cvt|1430|kg|lb|disp=br()}} | {{cvt|700|kg|lb|disp=br()}} | {{cvt|40|km|nmi|disp=br()}} | {{cvt|808|km/h|kn}} | Solid propellant | Surface | MCLOS (radio link) | France | |
BHT-38 | 1940 | {{cvt|160|kg|lb|disp=br()}} | {{dunno}} | {{dunno}} | {{dunno}} | None (glide bomb) | Air | MCLOS (radio link) | France | |
Sea Eagle | 1985 | {{cvt|580|kg|lb|disp=br()}} | {{cvt|230|kg|lb|disp=br()}} | {{cvt|110|km|nmi |disp=br()}} (min.) | {{cvt|1000|km/h|kn}} | Turbojet | Air | Inertial, active radar | United Kingdom | |
Sea Skua | 1983 | {{cvt|145|kg|lb|disp=br()}} | {{cvt|28|kg|lb|disp=br()}} | {{cvt|25|km|nmi |disp=br()}} | {{cvt|950|km/h|kn}} | Solid fuel | Air | Semi-active radar | United Kingdom | Used in combat |
RBS-15 | 1985 | {{cvt|800|kg|lb|disp=br()}} | {{cvt|200|kg|lb|disp=br()}} | {{cvt|200|km|nmi |disp=br()}} | {{cvt|1101|km/h|kn}} | Turbojet | Air, surface | Inertial, GPS, radar | Sweden | |
RB 08 | 1966 | {{dunno}} | {{dunno}} | {{cvt|70|km|nmi |disp=br()}} | Subsonic | Turbojet | Surface | Radio link active radar | Sweden/France | |
RB 04 | 1962 | {{cvt|600|kg|lb|disp=br()}} | {{cvt|300|kg|lb|disp=br()}} | {{cvt|32|km|nmi |disp=br()}} | Subsonic | Solid propellant | Air | Active radar | Sweden | |
Naval Strike Missile | 2009 | {{cvt|410|kg|lb|disp=br()}} | {{cvt|125|kg|lb|disp=br()}} | {{cvt|250|km|nmi |disp=br()}} | High subsonic | Turbojet and solid fuel booster | Air, surface | Inertial, GPS, terrain-reference, imaging IR, target database | Norway | |
Penguin | 1972 | {{cvt|385|kg|lb|disp=br()}} | {{cvt|130|kg|lb|disp=br()}} | {{cvt|55|km|nmi |disp=br()}} (min.) | {{cvt|1468|km/h|kn}} | Solid propellant | Air, surface, submarine | Inertial, laser, infrarred | Norway | |
Fritz X | 1943 | {{cvt|1362|kg|lb|disp=br()}} | {{cvt|320|kg|lb|disp=br()}} | {{cvt|5|km|nmi |disp=br()}} | {{cvt|1235|km/h|kn}} | None (glide bomb) | Air | Manual (radio link) | Germany | Used in combat |
Henschel Hs 293 | 1943 | {{cvt|1045|kg|lb|disp=br()}} | {{cvt|295|kg|lb|disp=br()}} | {{cvt|5|km|nmi|disp=br()}} | {{cvt|828|km/h|kn}} | Liquid-propellant, then gliding | Air | MCLOS (radio link) | Germany | Used in combat |
Blohm & Voss BV 246 | 1943 | {{cvt|730|kg|lb|disp=br()}} | {{cvt|435|kg|lb|disp=br()}} | {{cvt|210|km|nmi |disp=br()}} | {{cvt|450|km/h|kn}} | |None (glide bomb) | Air | Manual (radio link) | Germany | |
RK-360MC Neptune | 2021 | {{cvt|870|kg|lb|disp=br()}} | {{cvt|150|kg|lb|disp=br()}} | {{cvt|300|km|nmi |disp=br()}} | Subsonic | Turbofan | Ground based TEL | {{dunno}} | Ukraine | Used in combat{{Cite web|url=https://www.npr.org/2022/04/15/1093026912/russian-moskva-warship-sunk-ukraine|title = A Russian warship in the Black Sea was sunk by Ukrainian missiles, U.S. Official says|website = NPR|date = 15 April 2022|last1 = Treisman|first1 = Rachel}} |
BrahMos-II | 2030s | {{dunno}} | {{dunno}} | {{cvt|1000|km|nmi |disp=br()}} {{cvt|400|km|nmi |disp=br()}}(export version) | {{cvt|6125|–|8575|km/h|kn}} | Scramjet | Ship, surface, air, submarine | {{dunno}} | India/Russia | |
BrahMos | 2006 | {{cvt|2500|kg|lb|disp=br()}} (air), {{cvt|3000|kg|lb|disp=br()}} (ground) | {{cvt|300|kg|lb|disp=br()}} | {{cvt|800|km|nmi |disp=br()}} or {{cvt|290|km|nmi |disp=br()}}(Export version) | {{cvt|3675|km/h|kn}} | Ramjet | Ship, surface, air, submarine | INS, SatNav, ARH | India/Russia | |
Çakır (missile) | 2023 | {{cvt|275 | ||||||||
330|kg|lb|disp=br()}} | {{cvt|70|kg|lb|disp=br()}} | {{cvt|150 | ||||||||
200|km|nmi |disp=br()}} | {{cvt|919 | |||||||||
1040|km/h|kn}} | Turbojet | Ship, surface, air | Inertial, IIR, RF, Hybrid (IIR+RF) | Turkey | ||||||
Atmaca | 2017 | {{cvt|750|kg|lb|disp=br()}} | {{cvt|220|kg|lb|disp=br()}} | {{cvt|250|km|nmi|disp=br()}} +{{cvt|280|km|nmi|disp=br()}} (KARA Atmaca){{Cite web|url=https://www.roketsan.com.tr/en/products/kara-atmaca-surface-surface-cruise-missile|title = Roketsan - KARA ATMACA Surface-To-Surface Cruise Missile}}{{Cite web|url=https://www.roketsan.com.tr/en/product/atmaca-anti-ship-missile/|title=ATMACA ANTI-SHIP MISSILE – Roketsan|access-date=2021-06-19|archive-date=2021-02-05|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210205025326/https://www.roketsan.com.tr/en/product/atmaca-anti-ship-missile/|url-status=dead}} | {{cvt|1042|km/h|kn}} | Turbojet | Ship, surface, air | Inertial/GPS+RA+DL+IIR | Turkey | |
SOM (missile) | 2006 | {{cvt|600|kg|lb|disp=br()}} | {{cvt|230|kg|lb|disp=br()}} | SOM-A:{{cvt|250|km}} SOM-J:{{cvt|185|km}} | {{cvt|1153|km/h|kn}} | Turbojet | Air | Inertial / GPS, terrain referenced navigation, automatic target recognition, imaging infrared | Turkey | |
XASM-3 | 2016 | {{cvt|940|kg|lb|disp=br()}} | {{dunno}} | {{cvt|150|km|nmi |disp=br()}}(original version) {{cvt|400|km|nmi |disp=br()}}(extended range) | {{cvt|3707|km/h|kn}} | Ramjet | Air | Inertial / GPS, mid-course correction, active/passive radar | Japan | |
Type 12 | 2015 | {{cvt|700|kg|lb|disp=br()}} | ? | {{cvt|200|km|nmi|disp=br()}}(original version) {{cvt|400|km|nmi|disp=br()}}(ship/air-launched and improved version) {{cvt|900|km|nmi|disp=br()}}(upgrade in development) {{cvt|1500|km|nmi|disp=br()}}(future version) | ? | Turbojet | Ship, TEL, Air | Inertial, GPS, AESA | Japan | |
Type 93 | 1993 | {{cvt|530|kg|lb|disp=br()}} | {{dunno}} | {{cvt|170|km|nmi |disp=br()}} | {{dunno}} | Turbojet | Air | Inertial and IR Image | Japan | |
Type 91 | 1991 | {{cvt|510|kg|lb|disp=br()}} | {{cvt|260|kg|lb|disp=br()}} | {{cvt|150|km|nmi |disp=br()}} | {{dunno}} | Turbojet | Air | Inertial, mid course correction, active radar | Japan | |
Type 80 | 1982 | {{cvt|600|kg|lb|disp=br()}} | {{cvt|150|kg|lb|disp=br()}} | {{cvt|50|km|nmi|disp=br()}} | {{dunno}} | Turbojet | Air | Infarred | Japan | |
Ohka | 1943 | {{cvt|2140|kg|lb|disp=br()}} | {{cvt|1200|kg|lb|disp=br()}} | {{cvt|36|km|nmi |disp=br()}} | {{cvt|630|km/h|kn}} | Solid-propellant | Air | Manned (suicide attack) | Japan | Used in combat |
Hsiung Feng III | 2007 | {{cvt|1470|kg|lb|disp=br()}} | {{dunno}} | {{cvt|400|km|nmi |disp=br()}} | {{cvt|3,062|km|nmi}} | Ramjet | Ship, surface, air | Inertial / Active radar | Taiwan | |
Hsiung Feng IIE | 2011 | {{cvt|1600|kg|lb|disp=br()}} | {{dunno}} | {{cvt|600-2,000|km|nmi |disp=br()}} | {{cvt|1,041|km|nmi}} | Solid-fuel rocket | Ship, surface, air | Inertial/GPS/TERCOM | Taiwan | |
Hsiung Feng II | 1990 | {{cvt|685|kg|lb|disp=br()}} | {{cvt|180|kg|lb|disp=br()}} | {{cvt|20-250|km|nmi |disp=br()}} | {{cvt|1,041|km|nmi}} | Solid-fuel rocket | Ship, surface, air | Inertial midflight / Dual active radar plus infrared homing | Taiwan | |
Hsiung Feng I | 1978-2012 | {{cvt|537.5|kg|lb|disp=br()}} | {{cvt|150|kg|lb|disp=br()}} | {{cvt|40|km|nmi |disp=br()}} | {{cvt|833|km|nmi}} | Solid-fuel rocket | Ship, surface, air | Inertial / Radar beam riding plus terminal semi-active homing | Taiwan | |
Gabriel | 1962 | {{cvt|522|kg|lb|disp=br()}} | {{cvt|150|kg|lb|disp=br()}} | {{cvt|60|km|nmi |disp=br()}} | {{cvt|840|km/h|kn}} | Solid-fuel rocket | Air, surface | Active radar | Israel | Used in combat |
Hae Sung-I (SSM-700K) | 2005 | {{cvt|718|kg|lb|disp=br()}} | {{cvt|300|kg|lb|disp=br()}} | {{cvt|150|km|nmi |disp=br()}} | {{cvt|1013|km/h|kn}} | Turbojet | Ship, surface | Inertial, active radar | South Korea | |
Noor
|2005 |{{cvt|750|kg|lb|disp=br()}} |{{cvt|165|kg|lb|disp=br()}} |{{cvt|30-220|km|nmi|disp=br()}} |{{cvt|1110-1728|km/h|kn}} |Turbojet engine |Air, Surface, Ship |Inertial, Active radar homing |Iran |Used in combat | ||||||||||
Zafar
|2012 |{{cvt|120|kg|lb|disp=br()}} |{{cvt|30|kg|lb|disp=br()}} |{{cvt|25|km|nmi|disp=br()}} |0.8 M |Turbojet |Surface, Ship |Active radar |Iran | | ||||||||||
P15 & Silkworm KN1 | {{dunno}} | {{dunno}} | {{dunno}} | {{dunno}} | {{dunno}} | Turbofan | Surface, coastal | Inertial, active radar | North Korea/USSR/Russia | |
MANSUP | 2009 | {{cvt|380|kg|lb|disp=br()}} | {{cvt|150|kg|lb|disp=br()}} | {{cvt|74-100|km|nmi |disp=br()}} | {{cvt|870|km/h|kn}} | Solid-fuel rocket | Ship, surface | Inertial, active radar | Brazil | |
MANSUP-ER{{cite web| url = https://www.naval.com.br/blog/2023/11/13/grupo-edge-apresenta-o-missil-antinavio-mansup-er-no-dubai-air-show/ | title = Grupo EDGE apresenta o míssil antinavio MANSUP-ER no Dubai Air Show | website = Poder Naval | date = 14 November 2023 | language = pt }} | 2023 | {{cvt|380|kg|lb|disp=br()}} | {{cvt|150|kg|lb|disp=br()}} | {{cvt|200|km|nmi |disp=br()}} | {{cvt|950|km/h|kn}} | Turbofan | Ship, surface | Inertial, active radar | Brazil | |
| NASM-SR{{Cite web |last=Paul George |first=Justin |date=18 May 2022 |title=Smaller, slower than BrahMos, but deadly: Why desi anti-ship missile matters |url=https://www.theweek.in/news/india/2022/05/18/smaller-slower-than-brahmos-but-deadly-why-desi-anti-ship-missile-matters.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220519072519/https://www.theweek.in/news/india/2022/05/18/smaller-slower-than-brahmos-but-deadly-why-desi-anti-ship-missile-matters.html |archive-date=19 May 2022 |access-date=2022-05-18 |website=The Week |language=en}} | Expected for 2024 | {{cvt|375|kg|lb|disp=br()}} | {{cvt|100|kg|lb|disp=br()}} | {{cvt|55|km|nmi|disp=br()}} | {{cvt|980|km/h|kn}} | Solid-fuel rocket | Air | INS, SatNav, IIR | India | |
| NASM-MR | Expected for 2025 | {{cvt|750|kg|lb|disp=br()}} | {{cvt|150|kg|lb|disp=br()}} | {{cvt|150-250|km|nmi|disp=br()}} | {{cvt|980|km/h|kn}} | Solid-fuel rocket | Air | INS, SatNav, IIR | India | |
| LR-AShCM | 2023 | {{cvt|1450|kg|lb|disp=br()}} | {{cvt|200-300|kg|lb|disp=br()}} | {{cvt|1000|km|nmi|disp=br()}} | {{cvt|1110|km/h|kn}} | Turbofan | Ship, Surface, Air, Submarine | INS, SatNav, Hybrid (ARH, EO + IIR) | India | |
LRAShM
|{{dunno}} |{{dunno}} |{{dunno}} |>{{cvt|1500|km|nmi|disp=br()}} |>{{cvt|8|Mach|kn}} |Solid-fuel rocket |Ship, Surface |{{dunno}} |India | |
References
{{Reflist}}
External links
{{commons category|Anti-ship missiles}}
- [http://www.ausairpower.net/Warship-Hits.html Warship Vulnerability (tabulated shipping losses)]
- [https://web.archive.org/web/20070612161124/http://www.wonderland.org.nz/rnss.htm List of SSSR/Russian anti-ship missiles]
{{Missile types}}