Arctic Environmental Protection Strategy

File:Arctic ice melt.jpg

{{Short description|1991 adopted multilateral agreement}}

The Arctic Environmental Protection Strategy (AEPS) (sometimes referred to as the Finnish Initiative or Rovaniemi Process){{cite web|url=https://www.hs.fi/suomi/art-2000003975802.html|title=Rovaniemi-prosessi|last=Tahkolahti|first=Jaakko|work=Helsingin Sanomat|url-access=subscription|date=12 June 2001|access-date=26 December 2024|language=fi}} is a multilateral, non-binding agreement{{cite web |url=http://arcticcircle.uconn.edu/NatResources/Policy/uspolicy1.html |title=The Arctic Environmental Protection Strategy & the New Arctic Council |access-date=2008-09-23 |last=Russell |first=Bruce A. | archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20081011021542/http://arcticcircle.uconn.edu/NatResources/Policy/uspolicy1.html| archive-date= 11 October 2008 | url-status= live}} among Arctic states on environmental protection in the Arctic. Discussions began in 1989, with the AEPS adopted in June 1991 by Canada, Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, Sweden, the Soviet Union, and the United States. The AEPS deals with monitoring, assessment, protection, emergency preparedness/response, and conservation of the Arctic zone.{{cite web |url=http://www.carc.org/pubs/v21no4/protect.htm |title=The Arctic Environmental Protection Strategy |access-date=2008-09-23 |publisher=carc.org |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20061007013740/http://www.carc.org/pubs/v21no4/protect.htm |archive-date=2006-10-07 |url-status=dead }} It has been called a major political accomplishment of the post–Cold War era.{{cite book |title=The Oceans and Environmental Security: Shared Us and Russian Perspectives |editor-last=Broadus |editor-first=J.M. |editor-last2=Vartanov |editor-first2=R.V. |year=1994 |publisher=Island Press |location=Washington, D.C. |isbn=1-55963-235-6 |url=https://archive.org/details/oceansenvironmen00jame |url-access=registration |quote=Arctic Environmental Protection Strategy . |pages=[https://archive.org/details/oceansenvironmen00jame/page/176 176]}}

Background

In January 1989, Finland sent a letter to the other Arctic states proposing a conference on protection of the Arctic environment.Rothwell, p. 231 The Rovaniemi Meeting of September 1989 established two working groups. This was followed by the second consultative meeting in Yellowknife, Northwest Territories, Canada in April 1990 where a third ad hoc group was established to develop the strategy. It also resulted in the preparation of a draft document. Kiruna, Sweden was the site of the third meeting, held in January 1991, where one group worked on the drafting the AEPS while another dealt with specific environmental issues.

Adoption

Government officials from all the Arctic nations convened in Rovaniemi in June 1991 for the last consultative meeting. The first three days included meetings, followed by a ministerial-level meeting on 13–14 June observed by representatives from Germany, Poland, the United Kingdom, and the United Nations.

Three indigenous peoples' organizations observed, participated, assisted in developing the strategy, and later became Permanent Participants in the Arctic Council: the Saami Council, the Inuit Circumpolar Conference, and the Association of Indigenous Minorities of the North, Siberia and the Far East of the Russian Federation (RAIPON). They considered the Rovaniemi ministerial meeting to be "historic" as it represented the first time that Arctic indigenous peoples participated in an international declaration's preparation process.{{cite journal |journal=Northern Notes |volume=IV |pages=21–32 |url=http://arcticcircle.uconn.edu/NatResources/Policy/tennberg.html |title=CONTRIBUTING TO THE AEPS: INDIGENOUS KNOWLEDGE |access-date=2008-09-23 |last=Tennberg |first=Monica |date=December 1996 |publisher=uconn.edu| archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20081011023154/http://arcticcircle.uconn.edu/NatResources/Policy/tennberg.html| archive-date= 11 October 2008 | url-status= live}}

On 14 June 1991, the AEPS and the Declaration on the Protection of the Arctic Environment ("Rovaniemi Declaration") were formally adopted.{{cite book |title=The Polar Regions and the Development of International Law |last=Rothwell |first=Donald |year=1996 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |location=Cambridge |isbn=0-521-56182-5 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=xslq-KwOpqoC&q=%22Arctic+Environmental+Protection+Strategy+%22&pg=PA231 |pages=231–233}} The main objectives were listed as,

"Preserving environmental quality and natural resources, accommodating environmental protection principals with the needs and traditions of Arctic Native peoples, monitoring environmental conditions, and reducing and eventually eliminating pollution in the Arctic Environment."{{cite book |title=Nuclear Wastes in the Arctic: An Analysis of Arctic and Other Regional Impacts from Soviet Nuclear Contamination. |last=Office of Technology Assessment Washington DC |year=1995 |publisher=Defense Technical Information Center SEP |location=Ft. Belvoir |oclc=227865174 |isbn= 978-1-4289-2035-4|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=JLFX6EMPqBkC&q=aeps+finland&pg=PA196 |pages=196}}

Follow-up

The AEPS outlined five objectives and six pollution issues.Rothwell, p. 234 Legal issues included its jurisdictional reach and extent of obligations for the member states.Rothwell, p. 238 Data-gathering, information compilation, and assessment tasks were organized around these issues.{{cite book |title=Protecting the Polar Marine Environment: Law and Policy for Pollution Prevention |last=Vidas |first=Davor Vidas |year=2000 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |location=Cambridge |isbn=0-521-66311-3 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=i4ocFzO3pEgC&q=%22Arctic+Environmental+Protection+Strategy+%22&pg=PA84 |pages=84}}

In their 1993 follow-up meeting in Nuuk, Greenland, ministers endorsed expanding the AEPS in order to deal with sustainable development, and issued the Nuuk Declaration.{{cite web|url=http://arctic-council.npolar.no/Archives/AEPS%20Docs/Arctic%20Council%C2%A0_%C2%A0The%20Nuuk%20Declaration.htm |archive-url=https://archive.today/20120707080656/http://arctic-council.npolar.no/Archives/AEPS%20Docs/Arctic%20Council%C2%A0_%C2%A0The%20Nuuk%20Declaration.htm |url-status=dead |archive-date=2012-07-07 |title=The Nuuk Declaration |access-date=2008-09-23 |last=Ministers of the Arctic Countries |date=1993-09-16 |publisher=npolar.no }} Another meeting occurred in 1996 in Ottawa, Canada, resulting in the Ottawa Declaration (1996) and the establishment of the Arctic Council.{{cite web|url=http://www-cger.nies.go.jp/geo1/ch/ch3_31.htm |title=Chapter 3: Policy Responses and Directions |access-date=2008-09-23 |last=Global Environment Outlook-1 |year=1997 |work=United Nations Environment Programme, Global State of the Environment Report |publisher=nies.go.jp |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20050310050315/http://www-cger.nies.go.jp/geo1/ch/ch3_31.htm |archive-date=2005-03-10 }} The last meeting, held in 1997 in Alta following the AEPS's 1996 absorption into the Arctic Council resulted in the Alta Declaration.{{cite web|url=http://arctic-council.npolar.no/Archives/AEPS%20Docs/Arctic%20Council%C2%A0_%C2%A0The%20Alta%20Declaration.htm |archive-url=https://archive.today/20120708105830/http://arctic-council.npolar.no/Archives/AEPS%20Docs/Arctic%20Council%C2%A0_%C2%A0The%20Alta%20Declaration.htm |url-status=dead |archive-date=2012-07-08 |title=The Alta Declaration |access-date=2008-09-23 |last=Ministers of the Arctic countries |date=1997-06-13 |publisher=npolar.no }}

The AEPS remains a strategy for the Council's working groups,{{cite book |title=Arctic Legal Regime for Environmental Protection |last=Nowlan |first=Linda |year=2001 |publisher=IUCN, The World Conservation Union |location=Gland, Switzerland |isbn=2-8317-0637-8 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=KcTWZgW4uUYC&q=%22Arctic+Environmental+Protection+Strategy+%22&pg=PA5 |pages=5}} including:

Criticism

Critics of the Arctic Environmental Protection Strategy argue that it:

  1. Lacks ongoing political attention and direction, along with financial commitment.
  2. Lacks the legal authority of a treaty.{{cite news |last1=Pfirman |first1=S.L. |author-link1=Stephanie Pfirman|last2=Hajost|first2=S.A.|last3=Crane|first3=K. |title=We Have to Protect No-Longer-Pristine Arctic |url=https://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9E0CE3D81630F93AA15751C1A964958260 |newspaper=The New York Times |date=1992-12-29 |access-date=2008-09-23}}
  3. Involves studies and talks but lacks concrete action.{{cite book |title=The Law of the Sea and Polar Maritime Delimitation and Jurisdiction |last=Elferink |first=A.G.O. |author2=Rothwell, D.|author3=VanderZwagg, D.|author4=Huebert, R.|author5=Ferrara, S. |year=2001 |publisher=Martinus Nijhoff Publishers |location=The Hague |isbn=90-411-1648-6 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=RAOOlYTEzUEC&q=%22Arctic+Environmental+Protection+Strategy%22+criticism&pg=PA225 |pages=Chapter 12, p. 226}}
  4. Does not address specific problems, for example, Arctic haze.{{cite book |title=Polar Politics: Creating International Environmental Regimes |last=Young |first=O.R. |author2=Osherenko, G. |year=1993 |publisher=Cornell University Press |location=Ithaca |isbn=0-8014-8069-8 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=9L-WBqXXoGUC&q=%22Arctic+Environmental+Protection+Strategy+%22&pg=PA187 |pages=187}}

See also

References

{{reflist|30em}}