Bedout

{{Short description|Geological and geophysical feature in Western Australia}}

{{For|the French Navy officer|Jacques Bedout}}

{{Use Australian English|date=May 2024}}

{{Infobox terrestrial impact site

| name = Bedout

| other_name =

| photo =

| photo_size =

| photo_alt =

| photo_caption =

| map = Western Australia

| map_alt =

| map_caption = Location of Bedout offshore Western Australia

| map_size =

| location = Canning Basin

| label =

| label_position =

| coordinates = {{coord|18|S|119|E|region:AU-WA_type:landmark_scale:10000000|display=inline,title}}

| coordinates_ref =

| confidence = Possible

| diameter = {{convert|30|km|mi|abbr=on}}

| depth =

| rise =

| imp_size =

| age = 250.1 ± 4.5 Ma
Permian-Triassic boundary

| exposed = No

| drilled = Yes

| bolide =

| translation =

| language =

| pronunciation =

| topo =

| access =

| country = {{AUS}}

| state = Indian Ocean

| province =

| district =

| municipality =

}}

Bedout {{IPAc-en|b|ᵻ|ˈ|d|uː}}, or more specifically the Bedout High, is a geological and geophysical feature centered about {{convert|250|km|abbr=in}} off the northwestern coast of Australia in the Canning and overlying Roebuck basins. Although not obvious from sea floor topography, it is a roughly circular area about {{convert|30|km|abbr=in|sigfig=1}} in diameter where older rocks have been uplifted as much as {{convert|4|km|abbr=in}} towards the surface and may mark the centre of a very large buried impact crater up to {{convert|250|km|abbr=in}} in diameter.Gorter J.D. 1996. Speculation on the origin of the Bedout high - a large, circular structure of pre-Mesozoic age in the offshore Canning Basin, Western Australia. PESA News, October/November 1996, p. 32-34. The Bedout High was penetrated by two petroleum exploration wells (Bedout-1, Lagrange-1) in the 1970s and 1980s. It is named after nearby Bedout Island.

Impact hypothesis

In 1996 Australian geologist John Gorter first suggested that the Bedout High might mark the centre of a very large buried impact crater up to {{convert|250|km|abbr=in}} in diameter, based mainly on its internal geological structure as revealed on a single seismic survey line, and suggested that it may be of near end Permian age, based on the reported age of volcanic rocks in Lagrange-1.Gorter J.D. 1998. The petroleum potential of Australian Phanerozoic impact structures. The APPEA Journal 38, 159-187. The impact hypothesis was developed further by Luanne Becker (University of California) and coworkers who claimed to have confirmed that the supposed volcanic rocks in the petroleum wells are actually impact melt breccia showing evidence of shock metamorphism, and re-dated these rocks at 250.1 ± 4.5 Ma.Becker L., Poreda R.J., Basu A.R., Pope K.O., Harrison T.M., Nicholson C. & Iasky R. 2004. Bedout: A possible end-Permian impact crater offshore of northwestern Australia. Science 304, 1469-1476. [http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/abstract/1093925 Abstract] The new age is essentially coincident with the PermianTriassic boundary and associated extinction event, and Becker speculates that there is a likely connection. It was subsequently reported, based on very limited preliminary data, that the impact hypothesis is further supported by chromium isotope evidence for the presence of extraterrestrial material.Becker L., Shukolyukov A., Macassic C., Lugmair G. & Poreda R. 2006. Extraterrestrial Chromium at the Graphite Peak P/Tr boundary and in the Bedout Impact Melt Breccia. Lunar and Planetary Science XXXVII (2006), abstract # 2321.[http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2006/pdf/2321.pdf PDF]

Rebuttals to the impact hypothesis

The Bedout impact hypothesis has not been widely supported by impact cratering specialists. Specific counter claims include:

  1. The alleged impact melt breccia actually has the characteristics of a volcanic basalt, in part altered by contact with sea water and metamorphism due to its deep burial, and the evidence for shock metamorphism is likely mistaken.Glikson A. 2004. Comment on ‘‘Bedout: A possible end-Permian impact crater offshore of northwestern Australia’’. Science 306, 613b.[http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/reprint/306/5696/613b.pdf PDF]Glikson A. 2004. Bedout basement rise, offshore northwestern Australia: evidence of an unshocked mafic volcanic hyaloclastite volcanic breccia. Eos Trans. AGU, 85(47), Fall Meet. Suppl., Abstract B33C-0269.

[http://www.agu.org/cgi-bin/SFgate/SFgate?&listenv=table&multiple=1&range=1&directget=1&application=fm04&database=%2Fdata%2Fepubs%2Fwais%2Findexes%2Ffm04%2Ffm04&maxhits=200&=B33C-0269 Abstract] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070927192927/http://www.agu.org/cgi-bin/SFgate/SFgate?&listenv=table&multiple=1&range=1&directget=1&application=fm04&database=%2Fdata%2Fepubs%2Fwais%2Findexes%2Ffm04%2Ffm04&maxhits=200&=B33C-0269 |date=2007-09-27 }}

  1. A crater of the purported size would have produced a widespread layer of ejecta, but no such eject is evident at the nearest Permian-Triassic boundary sites in Australia.Wignall P., Thomas B., Willink R., Watling J., Becker L., Poreda R.J. & Pope K.O. 2004. Is Bedout an impact crater? Take 1. Science 306, 609-610.
  2. The presented evidence for impact fails to meet established standards, and the dating methodology is flawed.Renne P.R., Melosh H.J., Farley K.A., Reimold W.U., Koeberl C., Rampino M.R., Kelley S.P., Ivanov B.A., Becker L., Poreda R.J., Basu A.R., Pope K.O., Harrison T.M., Nicholson C. & Iasky R. 2004. Is Bedout an impact crater? Take 2. Science 306, 610-612.
  3. A detailed re-evaluation of the geophysical data indicates that the evidence is not consistent with the expected properties of a giant impact crater, but rather the Bedout High was likely the result of episodes of continental rifting.Müller R.D., Goncharov A. & Kristi A. 2005. Geophysical evaluation of the enigmatic Bedout basement high, offshore northwest Australia. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 237, 265-284.

See also

References

{{reflist}}