Bell Beaker culture#Britain

File:Blell Beaker artefacts 1.jpg

The Bell Beaker artefacts (at least in their early phase) are not distributed across a contiguous area, as is usual for archaeological cultures, but are found in insular concentrations scattered across Europe. Their presence is not associated with a characteristic type of architecture or of burial customs. However, the Bell Beaker culture does appear to coalesce into a coherent archaeological culture in its later phase.

The origin of the "Bell Beaker" artefacts has been traced to the early 3rd millennium, with early examples of the "maritime" Bell Beaker design having been found at the Tagus estuary in Portugal, radiocarbon dated to {{c.|28th}} century BC.{{sfn|Cunliffe|2010}}{{sfn|Case|2007}}{{sfn|Harrison|Heyd|2007}} The inspiration for the Maritime Bell Beaker is argued to have been the small and earlier Copoz beakers that have impressed decoration and which are found widely around the Tagus estuary in Portugal.{{sfn|Fitzpatrick|2013|p=44}} Turek sees Late Neolithic precursors in northern Africa, arguing the Maritime style emerged as a result of seaborne contacts between Iberia and Morocco in the first half of the third millennium BC.{{sfn|Fokkens|Nicolis|2012|p=201}}

More recent analyses of the "Beaker phenomenon", published since the 2000s, have persisted in describing the origin of the "Beaker phenomenon" as arising from a synthesis of elements, representing "an idea and style uniting different regions with different cultural traditions and background".{{sfn|Fokkens|Nicolis|2012|p=200}}{{ cite book | last=Vander Linden | first=Marc | year=2006 | title=Le phénomène campaniforme dans l'Europe du 3ème millénaire avant notre ère: Synthèse et nouvelles perspectives | publisher=Archaeopress | place=Oxford | series=British Archaeological Reports, international series, 1470 | isbn=9781841719061 | page=33 | language=fr }}

File:Architectural model of the Castro do Zambujal, Portugal.png, Portugal|207x207px]]

The initial moves from the Tagus estuary were maritime. A southern move led to the Mediterranean where 'enclaves' were established in south-western Spain and southern France around the Golfe du Lion and into the Po Valley in Italy, probably via ancient western Alpine trade routes used to distribute jadeite axes. A northern move incorporated the southern coast of Armorica. The enclave established in southern Brittany was linked closely to the riverine and landward route, via the Loire, and across the Gâtinais Valley to the Seine Valley, and thence to the lower Rhine. This was a long-established route reflected in early stone axe distributions, and via this network, Maritime Bell Beakers first reached the Lower Rhine in {{C.|2600}} BC.{{sfn|Cunliffe|2010}}{{sfn|Müller|Hinz|Ulrich|2015}}

File:Campaniforme M.A.N. 04.JPG.{{cite book |last1=Garrido Pena |first1=Rafael |chapter=Bell-Beakers in Iberia |date=2014 |editor-last1=Almagro |editor-first1=M. |title=Iberia: Protohistory of the Far West of Europe – From Neolithic to Roman conques |pages=113–124 |publisher=Universidad de Burgos / Fundación Atapuerca |isbn=978-84-92681-91-4 |url= https://www.researchgate.net/publication/265466361}}|261x261px]]

Another expansion brought Bell Beaker to Csepel Island in Hungary by about 2500 BC. In the Carpathian Basin, the Bell Beaker culture came in contact with communities such as the Vučedol culture ({{Circa|3000}}–2200 BC), which had evolved partly from the Yamnaya culture (c. 3300–2600 BC).{{efn|Marija Gimbutas characterized the Bell Beaker culture complex as an amalgam of the Vučedol and Yamna culture, formed after the incursion of the Yamna people into the Vučedol milieu and the interaction of these peoples for three or four centuries, from circa 3000 BC.{{cite book |last=Gimbutas |first=Marija |author-link=Marija Gimbutas |title=The Civilization of the Goddess: The World of Old Europe |date=1991 |pages=372 ff.}}}} In contrast to the early Bell Beaker preference for the dagger and bow, the favourite weapon in the Carpathian Basin during the first half of the third millennium was the shaft-hole axe.Joseph Maran (2007), [http://aegeobalkanprehistory.net/index.php?p=article&id_art=13 Seaborne Contacts between the Aegean, the Balkans and the Central Mediterranean in the 3rd Millennium BC – The Unfolding of the Mediterranean World]. In: Between the Aegean and Baltic Seas: Prehistory across Borders. Proceedings of the International Conference Bronze and Early Iron Age Interconnections and Contemporary Developments between the Aegean and the Regions of the Balkan Peninsula, Central and Northern Europe, University of Zagreb, 11–14 April 2005, eds. I. Galanaki, H. Tomas, Y. Galanakis and R. Laffineur, Aegaeum 27 (2007) 3–21, note 55. Here, Bell Beaker people assimilated local pottery forms such as the polypod cup. These "common ware" types of pottery then spread in association with the classic bell beaker.{{cite journal |last1=Piguet |first1=M. |last2=Besse |first2=M. |date=2009 |title=Chronology and Bell Beaker common ware |journal=Radiocarbon |volume=51 |issue=2 |pages=817–830 |doi=10.1017/S0033822200056125 |bibcode=2009Radcb..51..817P |doi-access=free}}

The Rhine was on the western edge of the vast Corded Ware zone ({{Circa|3100|2350 BC}}), forming a contact zone with the Bell Beaker culture. From there, the Bell Beaker culture spread further into Eastern Europe, replacing the Corded Ware culture up to the Vistula (Poland).Janusz Czebreszuk, [https://www.encyclopedia.com/humanities/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/bell-beakers-west-east Bell Beakers From West to East], in: Ancient Europe, 8000 B.C. to A.D. 1000: Encyclopedia of the Barbarian World{{efn|See Anthrogenica, [https://genoplot.com/discussions/topic/29459/eurogenes-blog-hungarian-yamnaya-bell-beakers Eurogenes Blog: Hungarian Yamnaya > Bell Beakers?], for a number of maps.}}

File:From Corded Ware to Sintashta.jpg, Yamnaya and Sintashta cultures|261x261px]]

A review in 2014 revealed that single burial, communal burial, and reuse of Neolithic burial sites are found throughout the Bell Beaker zone.Jeunesse, C. 2014. "Pratiques funéraires campaniformes en Europe – Faut-il remettre en cause la dichotomie Nord-Sud ? La question de la réutilisation des sépultures monumentales dans l'Europe du 3e millénaire", in Données récentes sur les pratiques funéraires néolithiques de la Plaine du Rhin supérieur, P. Lefranc, A. Denaire and C. Jeunesse (eds.), BAR International Series 2633, 211. Oxford: Archaeopress. This overturns a previous conviction that single burial was unknown in the early or southern Bell Beaker zone, and so must have been adopted from Corded Ware in the contact zone of the Lower Rhine, and transmitted westwards along the exchange networks from the Rhine to the Loire,{{cite journal |last=Salinova |first=Laure |date=2000 |title=La question du campaniforme en France et dans les Iles Anglo-Normandes |language=fr |journal=Bulletin de la Société Préhistorique Française |volume=94 |issue=2 |pages=259–264 |doi=10.3406/bspf.1997.10872}}{{cite book |last1=Lanting |first1=J. N. |last2=van der Waals |first2=J. D. |date=1976 |contribution=Beaker culture relations in the Lower Rhine Basin |title=Glockenbechersimposion Oberried 1974 |publisher=Fibula-Van Dishoeck |place=Bussum-Haarlem |pages=1–80 |isbn=9789022836194}} and northwards across the English Channel to Britain.{{sfn|Cunliffe|2010}}{{cite book |last=Needham |first=S. |date=2009 |chapter=Encompassing the Sea: "Maritories" and Bronze Age Maritime Interactions |editor-last=Clark |editor-first=Peter |title=Bronze Age Connections: Cultural Contact in Prehistoric Europe |publisher=Oxbow |location=Oxford |pages=12–37 |isbn=9781842173480}}

The earliest copper production in Ireland, identified at Ross Island in the period 2400–2200 BC, was associated with early Beaker pottery.{{sfn|Cunliffe|2010}}{{cite book |last=O'Brien |first=William |date=2004 |title=Ross Island: Mining, Metal and Society in Early Ireland |place=Galway |publisher=Department of Archaeology, National University of Ireland |isbn=9780953562039}} Here, the local sulpharsenide ores were smelted to produce the first copper axes used in Britain and Ireland.{{sfn|Cunliffe|2010}} The same technologies were used in the Tagus region and in the west and south of France.{{sfn|Cunliffe|2010}}{{cite book |last=Ambert |first=P. |date=2001 |chapter=La place de la métallurgie campaniforme dans la première métallurgie française |language=fr |editor-last=Nicolis |editor-first=Franco |title=Bell Beakers Today: Pottery, People, Culture, Symbols in Prehistoric Europe – Proceedings of the International Colloquium Riva del Garda (Trento, Italy) 11–16 May 1998 |publisher=Provincia Autonoma di Trento |place=Trento, Italy |isbn=9788886602433 |pages=577–588}} The evidence is sufficient to support the suggestion that the initial spread of Maritime Bell Beakers along the Atlantic and into the Mediterranean, using sea routes that had long been in operation, was directly associated with the quest for copper and other rare raw materials.{{sfn|Cunliffe|2010}}

While Bell Beaker (Glockenbecher) was introduced as a term for the artefact type at the beginning of the 20th century,

recognition of an archaeological Bell Beaker culture has long been controversial. Its spread has been one of the central questions of the migrationism vs. diffusionism debate in 20th-century archaeology, variously described as due to migration, possibly of small groups of warriors, craftsmen or traders, or due to the diffusion of ideas and object exchange.{{cite book |last=Lemercier |first=Olivier |chapter=The Mediterranean France beakers transition |editor-last1=Fokkens |editor-first1=Harry |editor-last2=Nicolis |editor-first2=Franco |date=2012 |title=Background to Beakers: Inquiries in Regional Cultural Backgrounds of the Bell Beaker Complex |place=Leiden |publisher=Sidestone |isbn=9789088900846 |pages=117–156}}

File:Ferriby boat 4.jpg from Ferriby, Britain, {{C.|2000}} BC|261x261px]]

Given the unusual form and fabric of Beaker pottery, and its abrupt appearance in the archaeological record, along with a characteristic group of other artefacts, known as the Bell Beaker "package", the explanation for the Beaker culture until the last decades of the 20th century was to interpret it as the migration of one group of people across Europe.

Gordon Childe interpreted the presence of its characteristic artefact as the intrusion of "missionaries" expanding from Iberia along the Atlantic coast, spreading knowledge of copper metallurgy. Stephen Shennan interpreted the artefacts as belonging to a mobile cultural elite imposing itself over the indigenous substrate populations. Similarly, Sangmeister (1972) interpreted the "Beaker folk" (Glockenbecherleute) as small groups of highly mobile traders and artisans. Christian Strahm (1995) used the term "Bell Beaker phenomenon" (Glockenbecher-Phänomen) as a compromise in order to avoid the term "culture".Strahm, Christian (ed.), Das Glockenbecher-Phänomen: Ein Seminar, Freiburger Arch. Studien 2 (Freiburg 1995) 4-14, pp. 386–396.

Heyd (1998) concluded that the Bell Beaker culture was intrusive to southern Germany, and existed contemporarily with the local Corded Ware culture.{{cite book |last=Heyd |first=Volker |date=1998 |chapter=Die Glockenbecherkultur in Süddeutschland– Zum Stand der Forschung einer Regionalprovinzentlang der Donau |trans-chapter=Bell Beaker Culture in Southern Germany, State of research for a regional province along the Danube |editor1-last=Benz |editor1-first=M. |editor2-last=van Willigen |editor2-first=S. |title=Some New Approaches to the Bell Beaker 'Phenomenon': Lost Paradise...? |publisher=Hadrian |series=British Archaeological Report S690 |place=Oxford |isbn=9780860549284 |pages=87–106 |language=de}}

The burial ritual which typified Bell Beaker sites appears to be intrusive to Western Europe, from Central Europe. Individual inhumations, often under tumuli with the inclusion of weapons contrast markedly to the preceding Neolithic traditions of often collective, weaponless burials in Atlantic/Western Europe. Such an arrangement is rather derivative of Corded Ware traditions.{{sfn|Fokkens|Nicolis|2012|p=201}}

File:Museum für Vor- und Frühgeschichte Berlin 026a.JPG) and Tököl (Hungary), {{Circa|2500-2200 BC}}|261x261px]]

British and American archaeology since the 1960s have been sceptical about prehistoric migration in general, so the idea of "Bell Beaker Folk" lost ground. A theory of cultural contact de-emphasizing population movement was presented by Colin Burgess and Stephen Shennan in the mid-1970s.{{cite book |last1=Burgess |first1=C. |last2=Shennan |contribution=The Beaker phenomenon: Some suggestions |first2=S. |editor1-last=Burgess |editor1-first=C. |editor2-last=Miket |editor2-first=R. |title=Settlement and Economy in the Third and Second Millennia BC: Papers Delivered at a Conference Organised by the Department of Adult Education, University of Newcastle upon Tyne |publisher=British Archaeological Reports |date=1976 |isbn=9780904531527 |series=International Ser. |volume=33 |place=Oxford |pages=309–331}}

Under the "pots, not people" theory, the Beaker culture was seen as a 'package' of knowledge (including religious beliefs, as well as methods of copper, bronze, and gold working) and artefacts (including copper daggers, v-perforated buttons, and stone wrist-guards) adopted and adapted by the indigenous peoples of Europe to varying degrees. This new knowledge may have come about by any combination of population movements and cultural contact. An example might be as part of a prestige cult related to the production and consumption of beer, or trading links such as those demonstrated by finds made along the seaways of Atlantic Europe. Palynological studies including analysis of pollen, associated with the spread of beakers, certainly suggests increased growing of barley, which may be associated with beer brewing. Noting the distribution of Beakers was highest in areas of transport routes, including fording sites, river valleys and mountain passes, Beaker 'folk' were suggested to be originally bronze traders, who subsequently settled within local Neolithic or early Chalcolithic cultures, creating local styles. Close analysis of the bronze tools associated with beaker use suggests an early Iberian source for the copper, followed subsequently by Central European and Bohemian ores.{{citation needed|date=April 2022}}

AOO and AOC Beakers appear to have evolved continually from a pre-Beaker period in the lower Rhine and North Sea regions, at least for Northern and Central Europe.{{sfn|Fokkens|Nicolis|2012|p=172}}

{{Multiple image

| align = right

| direction = horizontal

| header_align = left/right/center

| footer_align = left

| image1 = Horses1.png

| width1 = 164

| caption1 = Illustration of early Bronze Age horse bridles from Britain.{{cite journal |last=Librado |first=Pablo |date=2021 |title=The origins and spread of domestic horses from the Western Eurasian steppes |journal=Nature |volume=598 |issue=7882 |pages=634–640 |bibcode=2021Natur.598..634L |doi=10.1038/s41586-021-04018-9 |pmc=8550961 |pmid=34671162}}

| image2 = Bell Beaker period wagon illustration.png

| width2 = 122

| caption2 = Illustration of a Bell Beaker period wagon{{cite book |url= https://www.sidestone.com/books/stereotype |title=Stereotype:The role of grave sets in Corded Ware and Bell Beaker funerary practices |publisher=Sidestone Press |date=2020 |last=Wentink |first=Karsten |isbn=9789088909382 |doi=10.59641/ba84e5a2 |hdl=1887/123270}}}}

Investigations in the Mediterranean and France recently moved the discussion to re-emphasise the importance of migration to the Bell Beaker story. Instead of being pictured as a fashion or a simple diffusion of objects and their use, the investigation of over 300 sites showed that human groups actually moved in a process that involved explorations, contacts, settlement, diffusion, and acculturation/assimilation.

Some elements show the influence from the north and east, and other elements reveal the south-east of France to be an important crossroad on an important route of communication and exchange spreading north. A distinctive 'barbed wire' pottery decoration is thought to have migrated through central Italy first. The pattern of movements was diverse and complicated, along the Atlantic coast and the northern Mediterranean coast, and sometimes also far inland. The prominent central role of Portugal in the region and the quality of the pottery all across Europe are forwarded as arguments for a new interpretation that denies an ideological dimension.{{cite book |last=Lemercier |first=Olivier |date=2004 |chapter=Historical model of settling and spread of Bell Beakers Culture in the mediterranean France |editor-last=Czebreszuk |editor-first=J. |title=Similar but Different: Bell Beakers in Europe, Poznań Symposium, Poland, 26–29 May 2002 |publisher=Adam Mickiewicz University |place=Poznań, Poland |isbn=9788385215257 |pages=193–203}} Available from the [http://ubprehistoire.free.fr/Le-Prof-Article1.html author's web site].

Genetic findings also lend support to the migratory hypothesis. A strontium isotope analysis of 86 people from Bell Beaker graves in Bavaria, suggests that 18–25% of all graves were occupied by people who came from a considerable distance outside the area.{{cite journal |last1=Price |first1=T. Douglas |last2=Grupe |first2=Gisela |last3=Schröter |first3=Peter |title=Migration in the Bell Beaker period of central Europe |journal=Antiquity |volume=72 |issue=276 |pages=405–411 |date=1998 |s2cid=161292616 |doi=10.1017/S0003598X00086683}} This was true of children and adults, indicative of some significant migration wave. Given the similarities with readings from people living on loess soils, the general direction of the local movement is from the northeast to the southwest.

Archaeogenetics studies of the 2010s have been able to resolve the "migrationist vs. diffusionist" question to some extent. The study by Olalde et al. (2018) found only "limited genetic affinity" between individuals associated with the Beaker complex in Iberia and in Central Europe, suggesting that migration played a limited role in its early spread. However, the same study found that the further dissemination of the mature Beaker complex was very strongly linked to migration. This is true especially for Britain, where the spread of the Beaker culture introduced high levels of steppe-related ancestry, resulting in a near-complete transformation of the local gene pool within a few centuries, to the point of replacement of about 90% of the local Neolithic-derived lineages.

The two main international bell beaker styles are: the All Over Ornamented (AOO), patterned all over with impressions, of which a subset is the All Over Corded (AOC), patterned with cord-impressions; and the Maritime type, decorated with bands filled with impressions made with a comb or cord. Later, other characteristic regional styles developed.{{cite encyclopedia |first=Xavier C. |last=García |title=Encyclopedia of Prehistory: Volume 1: Africa |chapter=Bell Breaker |editor2-first=Peter Neal |editor2-last=Peregrine |editor2-link=Peter N. Peregrine |editor1-first=Melvin |editor1-last=Ember |editor1-link=Melvin Ember |encyclopedia=Encyclopedia of Prehistory |volume=4: Europe |date=2001 |publisher=Springer |page=24 |isbn=9780306462559}}

The beakers are suggested to have been designed for the consumption of alcohol, and the introduction of the substance to Europe may have fuelled the beakers' spread.{{cite conference |last=Sherratt |first=A. G. |date=1987 |chapter=Cups that cheered: The introduction of alcohol to prehistoric Europe |editor1-last=Waldren |editor1-first=W. |editor2-last=Kennard |editor2-first=R. C. |title=Bell Beakers of the Western Mediterranean: Definition, interpretation, theory and new site data |conference=The Oxford International Conference 1986 |place=Oxford |publisher=British Archaeology Reports |isbn=9780860544265 |pages=81–114}} Beer and mead content have been identified from certain examples. However, not all Beakers were drinking cups. Some were used as reduction pots to smelt copper ores, others have some organic residues associated with food, and still others were employed as funerary urns.{{cite journal |last=Guerra Doce |first=Elisa |date=2006 |title=Sobre la función y el significado de la cerámica campaniforme a la luz de los análisis de contenidos trabajos de prehistoria |language=es |trans-title=Function and significance of bell beaker pottery according to data from residue analyses |journal=Trabajos de Prehistoria |volume=63 |issue=1 |pages=69–84 |url= http://tp.revistas.csic.es/index.php/tp/article/viewFile/5/5 |issn=0082-5638 |doi=10.3989/tp.2006.v63.i1.5 |doi-access=free}}

File:Vase Denain.jpg|Bell Beaker, France, {{Circa|2500 BC}}

File:Small votive objects, Copper Age, City of Prague Museum, 175916.jpg|Votive dagger and bow-shaped pendant, Czech Republic

File:Lunule.JPG|Gold lunula, Brittany, France

File:Barnack Wrist-Guard.jpg|Stone wrist-guard with gold studs, England, {{Circa|2200 BC}}

File:03 Yacimiento calcolítico FuenteOlmedo by Ni.jpg|Metal dagger, gold diadem and wristguard, Spain.{{cite web |url= https://www.comunidad.madrid/noticias/2019/11/23/exposicion-brindis-principe-periodo-campaniforme-viaja-leon |title=Gold artefacts of the Bell Beaker culture, Iberia |date=22 November 2019}}

File:Pair of gold discs. Bronze Age. Discovered Tydavnet, County Monaghan, Ireland.jpg|Gold discs, Ireland, c. 2200-2000 BC{{cite web |url= https://100objects.ie/pair-of-gold-discs/ |website=A History of Ireland in 100 Objects |title=Pair of Gold Discs, 2200-2000 BC|date=5 October 2016 }}

File:Stone rubbing of anthropomorphic stele no 20, Sion, Petit-Chasseur necropolis 12.jpg|Stele fragment depicting patterned clothing, Switzerland, c. 2500 BC

File:Scotland beaker copy.jpg|All Over Corded beaker, Scotland

File:Bell Beaker bow reconstruction.jpg|Bell Beaker bow reconstruction.{{cite journal |last=Ryan |first=Jessica |title=Bell Beaker archers: Warriors or an ideology? |journal=Journal of Neolithic Archaeology |volume=20 |date=December 2018 |issue=Special Issue 4 |pages=97–122 |doi=10.12766/jna.2018S.6 |url= https://www.jna.uni-kiel.de/index.php/jna/article/view/141}}

As the Beaker culture left no written records, all theories regarding the language or languages they spoke remain conjectural. It has been suggested as a candidate for an early Indo-European culture, or as the origin of the Vasconic substrate.

James Mallory (2013) notes that the Beaker culture was associated with a hypothetical cluster of Indo-European dialects termed "North-West Indo-European", a cluster which includes the (predecessors of) Celtic, Italic, Germanic and Balto-Slavic branches.J.P. Mallory, 'The Indo-Europeanization of Atlantic Europe', in Celtic From the West 2: Rethinking the Bronze Age and the Arrival of Indo–European in Atlantic Europe, eds J. T. Koch and B. Cunliffe (Oxford, 2013), pp. 17–40 Earlier theories suggested a link to the hypothesised Italo-Celtic, or Proto-Celtic languages."Almagro-Gorbea – La lengua de los Celtas y otros pueblos indoeuropeos de la península ibérica", 2001 p. 95. In Almagro-Gorbea, M., Mariné, M. and Álvarez-Sanchís, J. R. (eds) Celtas y Vettones, pp. 115–121. Ávila: Diputación Provincial de Ávila.

File:Anthropomorphic stele no 25, Sion, Petit-Chasseur necropolis 13.jpg from Sion, Switzerland, 2700–2150 BC{{cite book |last1=Garrow |first1=Duncan |last2=Wilkin |first2=Neil |title=The World of Stonehenge |date=June 2022 |pages=172 |publisher=British Museum Press |isbn=9780714123493 |oclc=1297081545 |quote=In the statue-stelae of Le Petit-Chasseur, Sion, in the Rhone Valley of Switzerland ... male figures are carved with bows, arrows, axes, bead necklaces, belts, sporran-like pouches and daggers, while the female figures are embellished with lunula-like necklaces and their own distinctive belt types along with more elaborately decorated textiles. It has been speculated that the male textile patterns might represent quilted armour, known to be particularly effective against the archer's bow. The distinctive patterns of their clothing are also remarkably similar to the decorative motifs on Beaker pottery.}}]]Historical craniometric studies found that the Beaker people appeared to be of a different physical type than those earlier populations in the same geographic areas. They were described as tall, heavy boned and brachycephalic. The early studies on the Beakers which were based on the analysis of their skeletal remains, were craniometric. This apparent evidence of migration was in line with archaeological discoveries linking Beaker culture to new farming techniques, mortuary practices, copper-working skills, and other cultural innovations. However, such evidence from skeletal remains was brushed aside as a new movement developed in archaeology from the 1960s, which stressed cultural continuity. Anti-migrationist authors either paid little attention to skeletal evidence or argued that differences could be explained by environmental and cultural influences. Margaret Cox and Simon Mays sum up the position: "Although it can hardly be said that craniometric data provide an unequivocal answer to the problem of the Beaker folk, the balance of the evidence would at present seem to favour a migration hypothesis."{{cite book |last1=Cox |first1=Margaret |last2=Mays |first2=Simon |date=2000 |title=Human Osteology in Archaeology and Forensic Science |place=London |publisher=Greenwich Medical Media |isbn=9781841100463 |pages=281–283}}

Non-metrical research concerning the Beaker people in Britain also cautiously pointed in the direction of migration.A Test of Non-metrical Analysis as Applied to the 'Beaker Problem' – Natasha Grace Bartels, University of Albeda, Department of Anthropology, 1998 [http://www.collectionscanada.ca/obj/s4/f2/dsk2/ftp01/MQ34298.pdf] Subsequent studies, such as one concerning the Carpathian Basin,{{cite journal |last=Zoffmann |first=Zsuzsanna K. |date=2000 |title=Anthropological sketch of the prehistoric population of the Carpathian Basin |journal=Acta Biologica Szegediensis |volume=44 |issue=1–4 |pages=75–79 |url= http://www.sci.u-szeged.hu/ABS/Acta%20HP/44-75.pdf |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20160308112139/http://www.sci.u-szeged.hu/ABS/Acta%20HP/44-75.pdf |archive-date=8 March 2016}} and a non-metrical analysis of skeletons in central-southern Germany,{{cite journal |last1=Gallagher |first1=A. |last2=Gunther |first2=M. M. |last3=Bruchhaus |first3=H. |date=2009 |title=Population continuity, demic diffusion and Neolithic origins in central-southern Germany: The evidence from body proportions |journal=Homo |volume=60 |issue=2 |pages=95–126 |doi=10.1016/j.jchb.2008.05.006 |pmid=19264304}} have also identified marked typological differences with the pre-Beaker inhabitants.

Jocelyne Desideri examined the teeth in skeletons from Bell Beaker sites in Northern Spain, Southern France, Switzerland, the Czech Republic and Hungary. Examining dental characteristics that have been independently shown to correlate with genetic relatedness, she found that only in Northern Spain and the Czech Republic were there demonstrable links between immediately previous populations and Bell Beaker populations. Elsewhere there was a discontinuity.{{cite conference |last=Desideri |first=Jocelyne |title=Europe during the third millennium BC and Bell Beaker culture phenomenon: Peopling history through dental non-metric traits study |conference=Prix Latsis Universitaires |date=2008 |publisher=University of Geneva / Fondation Latsis Internationale |url= https://fondationlatsis.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/UNIGE_2008.pdf}}.

{{further|Western Steppe Herders}}

{{see also|Únětice culture#Genetics|Urnfield culture#Genetics|Hallstatt culture#Genetics|La Tène culture#Genetics|Celts#Genetics|Italic peoples#Genetics}}

File:Fig-46-Planta-do-tholos-de-Alcalar-7-seg-Veiga-1889-e-fragmentos-de-vasos.png, Portugal, c. 2500 BC{{cite journal |url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318361492 |journal=O Arqueólogo Português |volume=Série V, 4/5 |date=2014–2015 |title=The Bell‑beaker complex in Portugal: an overview |last=Cardoso |first=João Luís |pages=275‑308 |quote=Finally, in Algarve, where the occurrence of Beaker productions was completely unknown until 2005, it was necessary to wait for the archaeological intervention towards the recovery and valorization of one of the most remarkable collective tombs of the necropolis of tholoi at Alcalar, Portimão, explored in the late nineteenth century by Estácio daVeiga – Alcalar 7 – in order to find the first Beaker fragments, at the level of the monument construction, and dating from the mid-3rd millennium BC.}}]]

The earliest Bell Beaker samples in Iberia lacked Steppe ancestry, but between ~2500 and 2000 BC there was a replacement of 40% of Iberia's ancestry and nearly 100% of its Y-chromosomes by people with Steppe ancestry.{{cite journal |last1=Olalde |first1=Iñigo |display-authors=etal |date=2019 |title=The genomic history of the Iberian Peninsula over the past 8000 years, Supplementary Materials |journal=Science |volume=363 |issue=6432 |pages=64–65 |bibcode=2019Sci...363.1230O |doi=10.1126/science.aav4040 |pmc=6436108 |pmid=30872528 |quote=We assembled genome-wide data from 271 ancient Iberians of whom 176 are from the largely unsampled period after 2000 BCE, thereby providing a high resolution time transect of the Peninsula. We document high genetic substructure between northwestern and southeastern hunter-gatherers prior to the spread of farming. We reveal sporadic contacts between Iberia and North Africa by ~2500 BCE, and by ~2000 BCE the replacement of 40% of Iberia's ancestry and nearly 100% of its Y-chromosomes by people with Steppe ancestry.... [T]he lineages common in Copper Age Iberia (I2, G2, H) were nearly completely replaced by one lineage, R1b-M269.... These patterns point to a higher contribution of incoming males than females, also supported by a lower proportion of non-local ancestry on the X-chromosome, a paradigm that can be exemplified by a Bronze Age tomb from Castillejo del Bonete containing a male with Steppe ancestry and a female with ancestry similar to Copper Age Iberians.}} Y-chromosome lineages common in Copper Age Iberia (I2, G2, H) were nearly completely replaced by one lineage, R1b-M269. The most plausible source population for this genetic influx was found to be 'Germany Bell Beaker'.{{harvp|Olalde|2019|pp=64–65}} "We started by modeling the earliest individuals with steppe ancestry in Iberia (Iberia_CA_Stp), dated to ~2500-2000 BCE. ... Only one 2-way model fits the ancestry in Iberia_Copper_Age_Stp: Germany_Beaker (Germany Bell Beaker) + Iberia_CA (Iberia Copper Age). Finding a Bell Beaker-related group as a plausible source for the introduction of steppe ancestry into Iberia is consistent with the fact that some of the individuals in the Iberia_CA_Stp group were excavated in Bell Beaker associated contexts. ... For Iberia_BA (Iberia Bronze Age), we added Iberia_CA_Stp to the outgroup set as a possible source. The same Germany_Beaker + Iberia_CA model shows a good fit, but with less ancestry attributed to Germany_Beaker. Another working model is Iberia_CA+Iberia_CA_Stp, suggesting that Iberia_Bronze_Age is a mixture between the local Iberia_CA population and the earliest individuals with steppe ancestry in Iberia." The earliest samples with Steppe ancestry were located in northern Spain and were modelled as deriving 60.2% of their ancestry from Germany Bell Beaker and 39.8% from the Iberian Copper Age, whilst Iberian Bronze Age samples from c. 2000 BC were modelled as 39.6% Germany Bell Beaker and 60.4% Iberia Copper Age. Some Iberian samples had up to 100% Central European Bell Beaker ancestry.{{cite journal |title=The genomic history of the Iberian Peninsula over the past 8000 years (Olalde et al. 2019), Supplementary Material, Table S15 |date=2019 |pages=1230–1234|pmc=6436108 |last1=Olalde |first1=I. |last2=Mallick |first2=S. |last3=Patterson |first3=N. |last4=Rohland |first4=N. |last5=Villalba-Mouco |first5=V. |last6=Silva |first6=M. |last7=Dulias |first7=K. |last8=Edwards |first8=C. J. |last9=Gandini |first9=F. |last10=Pala |first10=M. |last11=Soares |first11=P. |last12=Ferrando-Bernal |first12=M. |last13=Adamski |first13=N. |last14=Broomandkhoshbacht |first14=N. |last15=Cheronet |first15=O. |last16=Culleton |first16=B. J. |last17=Fernandes |first17=D. |last18=Lawson |first18=A. M. |last19=Mah |first19=M. |last20=Oppenheimer |first20=J. |last21=Stewardson |first21=K. |last22=Zhang |first22=Z. |last23=Arenas |first23=J. M. |last24=Moyano |first24=I. J. |last25=Salazar-García |first25=D. C. |last26=Castanyer |first26=P. |last27=Santos |first27=M. |last28=Tremoleda |first28=J. |last29=Lozano |first29=M. |last30=Borja |first30=P. G. |journal=Science |volume=363 |issue=6432 |doi=10.1126/science.aav4040 |pmid=30872528 |bibcode=2019Sci...363.1230O |display-authors=1 }} A higher percentage of the genetic influx was due to men than women. These results confirm the earlier findings of Patterson et al. (2012) who detected "a signal of gene flow from populations related to present-day northern Europeans into Spain around 2000 BC", which was hypothesised to be a "genetic signal of the Bell Beaker culture".{{cite journal |last1=Patterson |first1=Nick |display-authors=etal |date=2012 |title=Ancient Admixture in Human History |journal=Genetics |volume=192 |issue=3 |pages=1065–1093 |doi=10.1534/genetics.112.145037 |pmc=3522152 |pmid=22960212}}

According to Olalde (2023) Iberian Bell Beaker samples with Steppe ancestry dating from the 3rd and 2nd millennia BC were approximately third cousins of Bell Beaker individuals from Central Europe, Britain and Scandinavia. The Y-chromosome (patrilineal) lineages of these Iberian samples were derived almost exclusively from Central European ancestors.{{cite AV media |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VtT9FBxco6o&t=1252s |title=Iñigo Olalde: The arrival of Steppe ancestry to the Iberian Peninsula |website=The Transformation of Europe in the Third Millennium BC (International Conference, Italy, 25–28 October 2023)}}

Villalba-Mouco et al. (2021) analysed genome-wide data from 136 southern Iberian individuals dating from the Late Neolithic (3300 cal BCE) to the Late Bronze Age (1200/1000 cal BCE). They found that Bronze Age populations, including those from the El Argar culture were "shifted toward populations with steppe-related ancestry from central Europe" compared to preceding Copper Age groups. After 2100 cal BCE, all individuals from all sites carried steppe-related ancestry, in line with R1b-P312 [R1b-M269] becoming the predominant Y-chromosomal lineage. The major additional ancestry source resembled central European Bell Beaker groups, which first contributed ancestry to northern Iberia, followed by a southward spread. According to the authors, "R1b-Z195, the most common Y lineage in BA Iberia, ultimately derives from a common ancestor R1b-P312 in central Europe." The authors propose that the El Argar culture "likely formed from a mixture of new groups arriving from north-central Iberia, which already carried central European steppe-related ancestry (and the predominant Y-chromosome lineage) and local southeastern Iberian CA groups that differed from other regions in Iberia in that they carried excess Iran_Neolithic-like ancestry similar to eastern and/or central Mediterranean groups."{{cite journal |last1=Villalba-Mouco |first1=Vanessa |display-authors=etal |date=2021 |title=Genomic transformation and social organization during the Copper Age–Bronze Age transition in southern Iberia |journal=Science Advances |volume=7 |issue=47 |pages=eabi7038 |bibcode=2021SciA....7.7038V |doi=10.1126/sciadv.abi7038 |pmc=8597998 |pmid=34788096}}

File:Shrewton Beaker Burial.jpg

File:The Devil's Humps - geograph.org.uk - 1503594.jpg

A study by Olalde et al. (2018) confirmed a massive population turnover in western Europe associated with the Bell Beaker culture. In Britain the spread of the Bell Beaker culture introduced high levels of Steppe-related ancestry and was associated with a replacement of ~90% of the gene pool within a few hundred years. British Beaker-associated individuals showed strong similarities to central European Beaker-associated individuals in their genetic profile. Both men and women with Steppe ancestry participated in the turnover in Neolithic Britain, as evidenced by the rise of the paternal haplogroup R1b-M269 and maternal haplogroups I, R1a and U4. The paternal haplogroup R1b was completely absent in Neolithic individuals, but represented more than 90% of the Y-chromosomes during Copper and Bronze Age Britain. The study also found that the Bell Beaker arrivals in Neolithic Britain had significantly higher genetic variants associated with light skin and eye pigmentation than the local population, but low frequencies of the SNP associated with lactase persistence in modern Europeans.

Strontium and oxygen isotope analysis of the Amesbury Archer, dating from c. 2300 BC (the richest burial in Britain in this period) found that he spent his childhood in Central Europe, probably in the region of the Alps.{{cite web |url=https://www.wessexarch.co.uk/our-work/amesbury-archer |title=The Amesbury Archer |website=Wessex Archaeology}}

File:KerhuéBras.jpg with stone burial chamber, France]]

Bell Beaker samples from France display a wide range of steppe-ancestry proportions, with a very high level of steppe ancestry in a male individual from northern France (with Y-DNA R1b-M269), to ~28% steppe ancestry in a male from southwestern France. As in Iberia, a drastic Y-chromosome turnover occurred during the Bronze Age, with R1b replacing the preexisting diversity of Neolithic lineages.{{cite journal |journal=Proc Natl Acad Sci USA |date=2020 |volume=26 |issue=117(23) |pages=12791–12798 |title=Ancient genomes from present-day France unveil 7,000 years of its demographic history |last1=Brunel |first1=Samantha |doi=10.1073/pnas.1918034117 |doi-access=free |pmid=32457149 |pmc=7293694 |bibcode=2020PNAS..11712791B |display-authors=etal}} Seguin-Orlando et al. (2023) dated the arrival of steppe ancestry in southern France to ∼2,650 BC.{{cite journal |url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960982220318352 |journal=Current Biology |volume=31 |issue=5 |date=2023 |title=Heterogeneous Hunter-Gatherer and Steppe-Related Ancestries in Late Neolithic and Bell Beaker Genomes from Present-Day France |last1=Seguin-Orlando |first1=Andaine |display-authors=etal |doi=10.1016/j.cub.2020.12.015}}

Lee et al. (2012) detected R1b two male skeletons from a German Bell Beaker site dated to 2600–2500 BC at Kromsdorf, one of which tested positive for M269 but negative for its U106 subclade (note that the P312 subclade was not tested for), while for the other skeleton the M269 test was unclear.{{cite journal |last1=Lee |first1=E. |display-authors=etal |title=Emerging genetic patterns of the European Neolithic: Perspectives from a late Neolithic Bell Beaker burial site in Germany |journal=American Journal of Physical Anthropology |volume=148 |issue=4 |pages=571–579 |date=2012 |pmid=22552938 |doi=10.1002/ajpa.22074 |doi-access=free}}

Two studies published in 2015 (Haak et al. 2015, Mathieson et al. 2015) found that Bell Beaker individuals from Germany and the Czech Republic had high proportions of Steppe-related ancestry, showing that they derived from mixtures of populations from the Steppe (such as Corded Ware and Yamnaya) and the preceding Neolithic farmers of Europe.{{cite journal |last=Haak |first=Wolfgang |title=Massive migration from the steppe was a source for Indo-European languages in Europe |journal=Nature |volume=522 |issue=7555 |pages=207–211 |date=2 March 2015 |bibcode=2015Natur.522..207H |pmid=25731166 |pmc=5048219 |arxiv=1502.02783 |doi=10.1038/nature14317}}{{cite journal |last=Mathieson |first=Iain |date=24 December 2015 |title=Genome-wide patterns of selection in 230 ancient Eurasians |journal=Nature |volume=528 |issue=7583 |pages=499–503 |bibcode=2015Natur.528..499M |doi=10.1038/nature16152 |pmc=4918750 |pmid=26595274}} The Y-chromosome composition of Beaker-associated males was dominated by R1b-M269, a lineage associated with the arrival of Steppe migrants in central Europe after 3000 BC. Bell Beaker individuals from Germany analysed by Haak et al. (2015) were found to have less Steppe ancestry than the earlier Corded Ware culture. In a comprehensive study including samples from across Europe, Yediay et al. (2024, preprint) showed conclusively that the steppe ancestry in Bell Beaker populations was derived from the Corded Ware culture, rather than from the Yamnaya culture.{{cite journal |publisher=bioRxiv |title=Ancient genomics support deep divergence between Eastern and Western Mediterranean Indo-European languages |last1=Yediay |first1=Fulya Eylem |journal=bioRxiv: The Preprint Server for Biology |display-authors=etal |date=2024 |doi=10.1101/2024.12.02.626332 |pages=Main text and supplementary text|pmid=39677618 |pmc=11642759 }}

Allentoft et al. (2015) found the people of the Bell Beaker culture to be closely genetically related to the Corded Ware culture, the Únětice culture and the Nordic Bronze Age.{{cite journal |last=Allentoft |first=M. E. |date=11 June 2015 |title=Population genomics of Bronze Age Eurasia |journal=Nature |volume=522 |issue=7555 |pages=167–172 |bibcode=2015Natur.522..167A |doi=10.1038/nature14507 |pmid=26062507 |s2cid=4399103 |url= https://depot.ceon.pl/handle/123456789/13155 |quote=European Late Neolithic and Bronze Age cultures such as Corded Ware, Bell Beakers, Unetice, and the Scandinavian cultures are genetically very similar to each other .... The close affinity we observe between peoples of Corded Ware and Sintashta cultures suggests similar genetic sources of the two .... Among Bronze Age Europeans, the highest tolerance frequency was found in Corded Ware and the closely-related Scandinavian Bronze Age cultures .... The Andronovo culture, which arose in Central Asia during the later Bronze Age, is genetically closely related to the Sintashta peoples, and clearly distinct from both Yamnaya and Afanasievo. Therefore, Andronovo represents a temporal and geographical extension of the Sintashta gene pool .... There are many similarities between Sintasthta/Androvono rituals and those described in the Rig Veda and such similarities even extend as far as to the Nordic Bronze Age.... While Y-chromosome haplogroup R1b was completely absent in Neolithic individuals (n=33), it represents more than 90% of the Y-chromosomes during Copper and Bronze Age Britain (n=52) (Fig. 3). The introduction of new mtDNA haplogroups such as I, R1a and U4, which were present in Beaker-associated populations from continental Europe but not in Neolithic Britain (Supplementary Table 3), suggests that both men and women were involved.... Our genetic time transect in Britain also allowed us to track the frequencies of alleles with known phenotypic effects. Derived alleles at rs16891982 (SLC45A2) and rs12913832 (HERC2/OCA2), which contribute to reduced skin and eye pigmentation in Europeans, dramatically increased in frequency between the Neolithic period and the Beaker and Bronze Age periods (Extended Data Fig. 7). Thus, the arrival of migrants associated with the Beaker Complex significantly altered the pigmentation phenotypes of British populations.}} Among modern populations, Bell Beaker people from Germany, France and Britain were closest genetically to modern British, Dutch, German, Danish and Swedish people.{{cite web |url= https://www.eupedia.com/genetics/bell_beaker_phenomenon.shtml |website=Eupedia.com |title=Bell Beaker phenomenon (c. 2900-1800 BCE) |quote=An analysis using MyTrueAncestry.com to compare the genomes of the Bell Beaker people from Germany, France and Britain with those of modern Europeans showed that the closest match in terms of genetic distance were British, Dutch, German, Danish and Swedish people.}}

File:Salisbury Museum, 'The Amesbury Archer' skeleton from the Late Neolithic period - geograph.org.uk - 7047710.jpg (buried near Stonehenge, England, {{C.|2300}} BC), grew up in Central Europe. Display at the Salisbury Museum]]

Furtwängler et al. (2020) analysed 96 ancient genomes from Switzerland, Southern Germany, and the Alsace region in France, covering the Middle/Late Neolithic to Early Bronze Age. They confirmed that R1b arrived in the region during the transitory Bell Beaker period (2800-1800 BC), along with Steppe-related ancestry. The vast majority of Bell Beaker R1b samples belonged to the U152 > L2 clade (11 out of 14; the other being P312 or L51).{{Cite journal |last1=Furtwängler |first1=Anja |last2=Rohrlach |first2=A. B. |last3=Lamnidis |first3=Thiseas C. |last4=Papac |first4=Luka |last5=Neumann |first5=Gunnar U. |last6=Siebke |first6=Inga |last7=Reiter |first7=Ella |last8=Steuri |first8=Noah |last9=Hald |first9=Jürgen |last10=Denaire |first10=Anthony |last11=Schnitzler |first11=Bernadette |last12=Wahl |first12=Joachim |last13=Ramstein |first13=Marianne |last14=Schuenemann |first14=Verena J. |last15=Stockhammer |first15=Philipp W. |date=20 April 2020 |title=Ancient genomes reveal social and genetic structure of Late Neolithic Switzerland |journal=Nature Communications |volume=11 |issue=1 |pages=1915 |doi=10.1038/s41467-020-15560-x |pmid=32313080 |pmc=7171184 |bibcode=2020NatCo..11.1915F |issn=2041-1723}}

Allentoft et al. (2024) found that individuals from Denmark dating from the 'Dagger Period' (c. 2300–1700 BCE) clustered with central and western European Late Neolithic-Bronze Age individuals dominated by males with lineages of R1b-M269/L51, matching the appearance of Bell Beaker material culture in Denmark at this time.{{cite book |last=Kristiansen |first=Kristian |url=https://www.academia.edu/236975 |title=Departure from the Homeland: Indo-Europeans and Archaeology – Selected Papers from the 12th European Association of Archaeologists Annual Meeting, Krakow, Poland, 19th to 24th Septembers 2006 |date=2009 |work=Departure from the Homeland(eds.): M. vanderLinden and C. Jones-Bley(2009) |editor1-last=Vander Linden |editor1-first=Mark |series=Journal of Indo-European Studies Monograph Series |volume=56 |pages=111–140 |contribution=Proto-Indo-European languages and institutions: An archaeological approach |editor2-last=Jones-Bley |editor2-first=Karlene |url-access=registration |via=Academia.edu}}{{cite journal |last1=Allentoft |first1=M. E. |display-authors=etal |date=2024 |title=100 ancient genomes show repeated population turnovers in Neolithic Denmark |journal=Nature |volume=625 |issue=7994 |pages=329–337 |bibcode=2024Natur.625..329A |doi=10.1038/s41586-023-06862-3 |pmc=10781617 |pmid=38200294}}

Papac et al. (2021) found that the earliest Bell Beaker individuals from Bohemia in the Czech Republic had a similar genetic composition to Corded Ware individuals. A closer phylogenetic relationship was observed between the Y-chromosome lineages found in early Corded Ware and Bell Beaker than in either late Corded Ware or Yamnaya and Bell Beaker. R1b-L151 was the most common Y-lineage among early Corded Ware males in Bohemia, and was ancestral to R1b-P312, the dominant Y-lineage found in Bell Beaker males.{{cite journal |doi=10.1126/sciadv.abi6941 |title=Dynamic changes in genomic and social structures in third millennium BCE central Europe |date=2021 |last1=Papac |first1=Luka |last2=Ernée |first2=Michal |last3=Dobeš |first3=Miroslav |last4=Langová |first4=Michaela |last5=Rohrlach |first5=Adam B. |last6=Aron |first6=Franziska |last7=Neumann |first7=Gunnar U. |last8=Spyrou |first8=Maria A. |last9=Rohland |first9=Nadin | last10=Velemínský | first10=Petr |last11=Kuna |first11=Martin |last12=Brzobohatá |first12=Hana |last13=Culleton |first13=Brendan |last14=Daněček |first14=David |last15=Danielisová |first15=Alžběta |last16=Dobisíková |first16=Miluše |last17=Hložek |first17=Josef |last18=Kennett |first18=Douglas J. |last19=Klementová |first19=Jana | last20=Kostka | first20=Michal |last21=Krištuf |first21=Petr |last22=Kuchařík |first22=Milan |last23=Hlavová |first23=Jana Kuljavceva |last24=Limburský |first24=Petr |last25=Malyková |first25=Drahomíra |last26=Mattiello |first26=Lucia |last27=Pecinovská |first27=Monika |last28=Petriščáková |first28=Katarína |last29=Průchová |first29=Erika | last30=Stránská | first30=Petra |journal=Science Advances |volume=7 |issue=35 |pmid=34433570 |pmc=8386934 |bibcode=2021SciA....7.6941P |display-authors=1 |quote=The earliest Bell Beaker individuals occupy a similar position in PCA as Corded Ware individuals, suggesting a degree of genetic continuity. ... We observe a closer phylogenetic relationship between the Y chromosome lineages found in early Corded Ware and Bell Beaker than in either late Corded Ware or Yamnaya and Bell Beaker. R1b-L151 is the most common Y-lineage among early Corded Ware males (6 of 11, 55%) and one branch ancestral to R1b-P312, the dominant Y-lineage in Bell Beaker.}}

Engovatova et al. (2024) found a particularly close genetic similarity between a male from the Abashevo culture in the Middle Volga region of Russia and Bell Beaker populations from Germany and the Czech Republic, reflecting the presence of Bell Beaker elements (as well as Únětice-like elements) in the material culture of Abashevo. The authors attribute this to a long-distance migration of groups from central Europe to the Middle Volga region.{{cite journal |url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/380374945 |journal=Stratum Plus Archaeology and Cultural Anthropology |volume=2 |date=2024 |title="Lost Child" or Vanguard? Linking Fatyanovo Population with Middle Volga Abashevo Culture using Ancient DNA Sequencing Data |last1=Engovatova |first1=A.V. |issue=2 |pages=227–249 |display-authors=etal |doi=10.55086/sp242227249}}

Olalde et al. (2018) analysed three Bell Beaker-associated individuals (one male and two females) from northern Italy (Parma), dating from 2200 to 1930 BC. Two of the individuals were found to have around 25% Early Bronze Age Steppe-related ancestry whilst one had none. The male belonged to Y-haplogroup R1b1a1a2a1a2 (R1b-M269/P312).

A study by Saupe et al. (2021) found that Bronze Age populations from Northern and Central Italy were characterised by a mix of earlier Chalcolithic ancestry and Steppe-related ancestry. The study found an autosomal affinity of North and Central Italian Bronze Age groups to Late Neolithic Germany, suggesting that Steppe-related ancestry could have arrived through Bell Beaker groups from Central Europe, such as 'Germany Bell Beaker'. Three out of the four Italian Bronze Age males for which the paternal haplogroup could be determined belonged to haplogroup R1, and two of those were of the R1b-L11 lineage, which was absent in earlier Chalcolithic samples but is common in modern Western Europe and in ancient male Bell-Beaker burials.{{cite journal |journal=Current Biology |date=2021 |volume=31 |issue=12 |title=Ancient genomes reveal structural shifts after the arrival of Steppe-related ancestry in the Italian Peninsula |last1=Saupe |first1=Tina |display-authors=etal |pages=2576–2591.E12 |doi=10.1016/j.cub.2021.04.022 |pmid=33974848 |s2cid=234471370 |quote=all the Bronze Age groups from North and Central Italy presented here support a scenario in which Chalcolithic-like individuals received a contribution of Steppe-related ancestry, possibly through Late Neolithic/Chalcolithic groups from the north, such as Germany Bell Beaker .... Consistent with the previously reported co-spread of Steppe-related ancestry and Y-chromosome haplogroup R1, we observed that three out of the four Italian Bronze Age males for which a Ychr haplogroup could be determined belong to haplogroup R1 and two of those were of the R1b lineage. This haplogroup does not appear in the Chalcolithic samples. The two Italian R1b lineages belong to the L11 subset of R1b, which is common in modern Western Europe and in ancient male Bell-Beaker burials .... Our qpAdm results suggest that the Steppe-related ancestry component could have arrived through Late Neolithic/Bell Beaker groups from Central Europe .... Together with the autosomal affinity of North and Central Italian Bronze Age groups with Late Neolithic Germany, the Ychr data point to a possibly Northern-, trans-alpine-, and potentially Bell-Beaker-associated source of the Italian Steppe-related ancestry. |doi-access=free |bibcode=2021CBio...31E2576S |hdl=11585/827581 |hdl-access=free}}

Posth et al. (2021) found that Iron Age Etruscans from central Italy could be modelled as deriving 50% of their ancestry from Central European Bell Beakers (represented by Germany Bell Beaker), with around 25-30% steppe ancestry. Two Etruscan samples were modelled as having 80% Germany Bell Beaker ancestry. Overall, the Etruscan samples showed ~75% frequency of the Y-haplogroup R1b, mostly represented by R1b-P312 and its derived R1b-L2 lineage "that diffused across Europe alongside steppe-related ancestry in association with the Bell Beaker complex." According to the authors, the Etruscans carried "a local genetic profile shared with other neighboring populations such as the Latins from Rome and its environs despite the cultural and linguistic differences between the two neighboring groups."{{cite journal |journal=Science Advances |volume=7 |issue=39 |date=2021 |title=The origin and legacy of the Etruscans through a 2000-year archeogenomic time transect |last1=Posth |first1=Cosimo |pages=eabi7673 |display-authors=etal |doi=10.1126/sciadv.abi7673 |pmid=34559560 |pmc=8462907 |bibcode=2021SciA....7.7673P}} Antonio et al. (2019) similarly found that 5 out of 6 male Iron Age Latins samples belonged to the R1b-M269 Y-haplogroup, consistent with "the arrival of Steppe ancestry, via migration of Steppe pastoralists or intermediary populations in the preceding Bronze Age.", and did not find significant genetic differentiation between the Latins and the Etruscans. The Iron Age Latin population showed a clear ancestry shift from the earlier Copper Age, modelled as an introduction of ~30 to 40% steppe ancestry, which was indicative of "large-scale immigration before the Iron Age."{{cite journal |last1=Antonio |first1=Margaret |display-authors=etal |date=2019 |title=Ancient Rome: A genetic crossroads of Europe and the Mediterranean |journal=Science |volume=366 |issue=6466 |pages=708–714 |doi=10.1126/science.aay6826 |pmid=31699931 |pmc=7093155 |bibcode=2019Sci...366..708A |hdl=2318/1715466 |hdl-access=free}}

Yediay et al. (2024, Preprint) found that the arrival of steppe ancestry in Italy was mediated by "Bell Beaker populations of Western Europe", likely contributing to the emergence of the Italic and Celtic languages and consistent with the Italo-Celtic linguistic hypothesis. This Bell Beaker-related steppe ancestry was in turn derived from the earlier Corded Ware culture, rather than from the Yamnaya culture.

According to Chintalapatia et al. (2022) a majority of Bronze Age samples from Sardinia lacked steppe-related ancestry, though evidence for steppe-related ancestry was found in a few individuals. This ancestry is estimated to have arrived in Sardinia ~2600 BC.{{cite journal |journal=eLife |volume=11 |date=2022 |title=The spatiotemporal patterns of major human admixture events during the European Holocene |last1=Chintalapatia |first1=Manjusha |pages=e77625 |display-authors=etal |doi=10.7554/eLife.77625 |pmid=35635751 |pmc=9293011 |doi-access=free}}

Yediay et al. (2024, Preprint) identified a small amount of Bell Beaker ancestry in some individuals from Bronze Age Greece, "reflecting a connection with Central Eastern Europe" and "contact with the populations from the Balkan Bronze Age". Two outlier individuals from Cyprus, dating from c. 1700 BC clustered with Scandinavian Bronze Age individuals and were modelled as deriving their ancestry from the Bell Beaker culture. One of these individuals carried the male haplogroup I1 and displayed a non-local strontium isotope signature compatible with an origin in Scandinavia (particularly Sweden), revealing "an extraordinary journey from Scandinavia to Cyprus". This may be related to the presence of ring ingots and dress pins from the Central European Únětice culture in Cyprus from the beginning of the 2nd millennium BC.

In a 2020 review Fregel et al. identified European Bronze Age ancestry (including Steppe ancestry) in Guanches from the Canary Islands, which could be explained by "the presence of Bell-Beaker pottery in the North African archaeological record" and "the expansion of European Bronze Age populations in North Africa".{{cite journal |url= https://academic.oup.com/hmg/article/30/R1/R64/6028725?login=false |journal=Human Molecular Genetics |volume=30 |issue=R1 |date=2020 |title=The demography of the Canary Islands from a genetic perspective |last1=Fregel |first1=Rosa |display-authors=etal |pages=R64–R71 |doi=10.1093/hmg/ddaa262 |pmid=33295602 |doi-access=free}} Serrano et al. 2023 analysed genome-wide data from 49 Guanche individuals, whose ancestry was modelled as comprising 73.3% Morocco Late Neolithic, 6.9% Morocco Early Neolithic, 13.4% Germany Bell Beaker and 6.4% Mota on average. Germany Bell Beaker ancestry reached 16.2% and 17.9% in samples from Gran Canaria and Lanzarote respectively.{{cite journal |last1=Serrano |first1=J. G. |display-authors=etal |title=The genomic history of the indigenous people of the Canary Islands |journal=Nature Communications |volume=14 |issue=4641 |date=2023 |at="Supplementary Information" section, p. 13 |doi=10.1038/s41467-023-40198-w |doi-access=free |pmid=37582830 |pmc=10427657 |bibcode=2023NatCo..14.4641S |hdl=10553/124288 |hdl-access=free |quote=Two indigenous individuals belong to the R-M269 haplogroup: one from Punta Azul (El Hierro) and one from Guayadeque (Gran Canaria). R-M269 is the most common haplogroup in Western Europe, although it is also found in North Africa in lower frequencies. When ancient individuals were further classified within R-M269, both showed derived SNPs on the branch clustering R-L11 individuals. Although the R-L11 lineage is commonly restricted to Western Europe, it was common in Early Bronze Age populations from Europe and could have reached North Africa with Bronze Age migrations from this region (as implied by the presence of Bell Beaker pottery).}} Bell Beaker-related haplogroups identified in the Guanches include Y-DNA R1b-M269, mtDNA U5 and mtDNA H4a1.{{cite journal |last1=Fregel |first1=Rosa |display-authors=etal |date=2020 |title=The demography of the Canary Islands from a genetic perspective |url= https://academic.oup.com/hmg/article/30/R1/R64/6028725?login=false |journal=Human Molecular Genetics |volume=30 |issue=R1 |pages=R64–R71 |doi=10.1093/hmg/ddaa262 |pmid=33295602 |doi-access=free}}{{cite journal |last1=Fregel |first1=Rosa |display-authors=etal |date=20 March 2019 |title=Mitogenomes illuminate the origin and migration patterns of the indigenous people of the Canary Islands |journal=PLoS One |volume=14 |issue=3 |pages=e0209125 |doi=10.1371/journal.pone.0209125 |pmc=6426200 |pmid=30893316 |quote= |doi-access=free |bibcode=2019PLoSO..1409125F}}{{cite journal |last1=Ordóñez |first1=Alejandra C. |display-authors=etal |date=February 2017 |title=Genetic studies on the prehispanic population buried in Punta Azul cave (El Hierro, Canary Islands) |url= https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305440316301686 |access-date=13 July 2020 |journal=Journal of Archaeological Science |publisher=Elsevier |volume=78 |pages=20–28 |doi=10.1016/j.jas.2016.11.004 |bibcode=2017JArSc..78...20O|url-access=subscription }} These haplogroups have also been identified in mummies from Ancient Egypt.{{cite journal |last1=Drosou |first1=Konstantina |date=2020 |title=The first reported case of the rare mitochondrial haplotype H4a1 in ancient Egypt |journal=Scientific Reports |volume=10 |issue=1 |page=17037 |bibcode=2020NatSR..1017037D |doi=10.1038/s41598-020-74114-9 |pmc=7550590 |pmid=33046824 |quote=Takabuti belonged to mitochondrial haplogroup H4a1..... [I]n the archaeological record H4a1 has been reported in sixth–fourteenth century CE remains sourced from the Canary Islands, and three additional ancient DNA samples, two from Bell Beaker and Unetice contexts (2500–1575 BCE) at Quedlinburg and Eulau, both in Saxony-Anhalt, Germany, and one individual from early Bronze Age Bulgaria .... Perhaps the most intriguing aspect of our findings, which is of great archaeological interest and importance, is the observation of a predominantly European haplogroup in an Egyptian individual located in Southern Egypt.}}{{Cite journal |title=Biological Sexing of a 4000-Year-Old Egyptian Mummy Head to Assess the Potential of Nuclear DNA Recovery from the Most Damaged and Limited Forensic Specimens |date=2018 |pmc=5867856 |last1=Loreille |first1=O. |display-authors=etal |journal=Genes |volume=9 |issue=3 |page=135 |doi=10.3390/genes9030135 |pmid=29494531 |doi-access=free }}{{cite book |url= https://www.researchgate.net/publication/353306320 |title=Guardian of Ancient Egypt: Essays in Honor of Zahi Hawass |date=2020 |chapter=Maternal and paternal lineages in King Tutankhamun's family |publisher=Czech Institute of Egyptology |last1=Gad |first1=Yehia |isbn=978-80-7308-979-5 |pages=497–518 |quote=The haplogroup for three of the investigated mummies, namely Tutankhamun, KV55 (Akhenaten) and Amenhotep III, was R1b}}{{cite web |url= https://www.igenea.co.uk/en/tutankhamun |title=The Tutankhamun DNA Project |website=iGenea |quote=Tutankhamun belongs to the haplogroup R-M269, which more than 50% of all men in Western Europe belong to.}}{{Cite journal |doi=10.1134/S1995078020050183 |title=Paleogenetic Study of Ancient Mummies at the Kurchatov Institute |date=2020 |last1=Yatsishina |first1=E. B. |display-authors=etal |journal=Nanotechnologies in Russia |volume=15 |issue=9–10 |pages=524–531 |s2cid=232315321 |quote=Haplogroup R1b1a1b [R1b-M269] isolated in the studied samples is also uncharacteristic of the modern Egyptian population; its frequency in the population is less than 1%, while it is found in approximately half of the male population of Western Europe.}}

File:161 Musée préhistoire Penmarc'h.JPG

Bell Beaker people took advantage of transport by sea and rivers, creating a cultural spread extending from Ireland to the Carpathian Basin and south along the Atlantic coast and along the Rhône valley to Portugal, North Africa, and Sicily, even penetrating northern and central Italy.The Oxford Illustrated Prehistory of Europe - Barry Cunliffe, Oxford University Press (1994), pp. 250–254. Its remains have been found in what is now Portugal, Spain, France (excluding the central massif), Ireland and Great Britain, the Low Countries and Germany between the Elbe and Rhine, with an extension along the upper Danube into the Vienna Basin (Austria), Hungary and the Czech Republic, with Mediterranean outposts on Sardinia and Sicily; there is less certain evidence for direct penetration in the east.

Beaker-type vessels remained in use longest in Great Britain and Ireland; late beakers in other areas are classified as early Bronze Age (Barbed Wire Beakers in the Netherlands, Giant Beakers (Riesenbecher)). The new international trade routes opened by the Beaker people became firmly established and the culture was succeeded by a number of Bronze Age cultures, among them the Únětice culture in Central Europe, the Elp culture and Hilversum culture in the Netherlands, the Atlantic Bronze Age in Great Britain, Ireland, and the Atlantic coast of Europe, and by the Nordic Bronze Age, a culture of Scandinavia and northernmost Germany–Poland.

{{Further information|Chalcolithic Iberia}}

File:Museo Arqueológico Nacional - 32252 - Vaso de Ciempozuelos, cropped 1.jpg, Spain|145x145px]]

The Bell Beaker phenomenon in the Iberian Peninsula defines the late phase of the local Chalcolithic and even intrudes in the earliest centuries of the Bronze Age.F. Jordá Cerdá et al., Historia de España 1: Prehistoria, 1986. {{ISBN|842491015X}}. A review of radiocarbon dates for Bell Beaker across Europe found that some of the earliest were found in Portugal, c. 2750 BC, in contrast to the rather later range for Andalusia ({{circa|2500–2200 BC}}).

At present, no internal chronology for the various Bell Beaker-related styles has been achieved yet for Iberia.{{cite journal |last=Jorge |first=Susana Oliveira |date=2002 |title=An all-over corded Bell Beaker in northern Portugal: Castelo Velho de Freixo de Numão (Vila Nova de Foz Côa) – Some remarks |journal=Journal of Iberian Archaeology |volume=4 |pages=107–123 |url= https://architectures.home.sapo.pt/JIA%204%20SOJc.pdf |url-status=dead |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20050124065255/http://architectures.home.sapo.pt/JIA%204%20SOJc.pdf |archive-date=24 January 2005}} Peninsular corded Bell Beakers are usually found in coastal or near coastal regions in three main regions: the western Pyrenees, the lower Ebro and adjacent east coast, and the northwest (Galicia and northern Portugal).{{cite book |last=Prieto Martínez |first=M. P. |contribution=Unity and circulation: What underlies the homogeneity of Galician bell beaker ceramic style? |editor-last1=Prieto Martínez |editor-first1=M. Pilar |editor-last2=Salanova |editor-first2=Laure |title=Current Researches on Bell Beakers: Proceedings of 15th International Bell Beaker Conference – From Atlantic to Ural, 5th-9th May 2011, Poio (Pontevedra, Galicia, Spain) |date=2013 |publisher=Copynino |location=Santiago de Compostela |isbn=9788494153709 |chapter-url= https://www.academia.edu/5952632 |access-date=4 October 2015 |chapter-url-access=registration}} A corded-zoned Maritime variety (C/ZM), proposed to be a hybrid between AOC and Maritime Herringbone, was mainly found in burial contexts and expanded westward, especially along the mountain systems of the Meseta.

File:Los Millares recreacion cuadro.jpg, Spain]]

With some notable exceptions, most Iberian early Bell Beaker "burials" are at or near the coastal regions. As for the settlements and monuments within the Iberian context, Beaker pottery is generally found in association with local Chalcolithic material and appears most of all as an "intrusion" from the third millennium in burial monuments whose origin may go back to the fourth or fifth millennia BC.

Very early dates for Bell Beakers were found in Castelo Velho de Freixo de Numão in Guarda, northern Portugal. The site was located on the summit of a spur. A short-lived first occupation of pre-Bell Beaker building phase at {{C.|3000}} BC revealed the remains of a tower, some pavings, and structures for burning. After a break of one or two centuries, Bell Beaker pottery was introduced in a second building phase that lasted to the Early Bronze Age, {{C.|1800}} BC. A third building phase followed directly and lasted to {{C.|1300}} BC, after which the site was covered with layers of stone and clay, apparently deliberately, and abandoned.

The second building phase was dominated by a highly coherent group of pottery within the regional Chalcolithic styles, representing Maritime Bell Beakers of the local (northern Portuguese), penteada decoration style in various patterns, using lines of points, incision or impression. Three of them were carbon dated to the first half of the third millennium BC. The site demonstrates a notable absence of more common Bell Beaker pottery styles such as Maritime Herringbone and Maritime Lined varieties found in nearby sites such as Castanheiro do Vento and Crasto de Palheiros. One non-local Bell Beaker sherd, however, belonging to the upper part of a beaker with a curved neck and thin walls, was found at the bedrock base of this second phase. The technique and patterning are classic forms in the context of pure European and Peninsular corded ware. In the Iberian Peninsula, this AOC type was traditionally restricted to half a dozen scattered sites in the western Pyrenees, the lower Ebro, and the Spanish east coast; especially a vessel at Filomena at Villarreal, Castellón (Spain), has parallels with the decoration. In Porto Torrão, at inner Alentejo (southern Portugal), a similar vessel was found having a date ultimately corrected to {{C.}}2823–2658 BC. All pottery was locally made. The lack or presence of Bell Beaker elements is the basis for the division of Los Millares and Vila Nova cultures into two periods: I and II.

A gold lunula with two gold discs was found in Cabeceiras de Basto, Portugal, dating from the Bell Beaker period.{{cite journal |last=Cahill |first=Mary |date=Spring 2015 |title=Here comes the sun...: Solar symbolism in Early Bronze Age Ireland |journal=Archaeology Ireland |volume=29 |issue=1 |pages=26–33 |url= https://www.academia.edu/11627053 |via=Academia.edu |url-access=registration}}{{cite book |url= https://www.archaeopress.com/Archaeopress/Products/9781784913076 |title=Analysis of the Economic Foundations Supporting the Social Supremacy of the Beaker Groups: Proceedings of the XVII UISPP World Congress (1-7 September, Burgos, Spain) |editor-last1=Doce |editor-first1=Elisa |editor-last2=von Lettow-Vorbeck |editor-first2=Corina |publisher=Archaeopress |date=September 2014 |isbn=9781784913076 |pages=48 |quote=The Cabeceiras de Basto discs were found with a lunula whose similarities to the Irish series were noted by Cardoso in the first publication of the find (Cardoso, 1930: 6-16, fig. 2). Even if the Cabeceiras de Basto lunula is 'a very peripheral cousin of the British lunula' (Taylor, 1980: 24, pl. 23, b), it is still related. The association of lunula and discs, both types of object that are well known in Ireland (Case, 1977; Cahill, 2015) is unlikely to be coincidental. It has been demonstrated recently in relation to the Coggalbeg, Co. Roscommon find that lunulae and sun discs were sometimes associated in Ireland (Kelly & Cahill, 2010). The pair of gold discs from Oviedo is less well known than the Cabeceiras de Basto finds and although their decoration differs from the Irish discs in detail, they are similar in their shape and size, in having a central cross and central holes, and in having been made as a pair (Macwhite, 1951: 50, lám. viii). These finds seem likely to be broadly contemporary with the Tablada del Rudrón ornaments.}}

In 2016 archaeologists discovered a large circular earthwork enclosure in southern Spain near Carmona (Sevilla), dating from the Bell Beaker period, {{C.}}2600–2200 BC. The complex of concentric rings, known as 'La Loma del Real Tesoro II' may have been used for holding rituals.{{cite web |url= https://uni-tuebingen.de/en/newsfullview-landingpage/article/kupferzeitliche-kreisgrabenanlage-in-suedspanien-entdeckt.html |title=First Bell Beaker earthwork enclosure found in Spain |website=University of Tübingen |date=2016}}{{cite journal |url= https://www.academia.edu/35423441 |title=Chalcolithic enclosures in the lower Guadalquivir Basin: La Loma del Real Tesoro |journal=Bartelheim, M.; Bueno Ramírez, P. And Kunst, M. (Eds.): Key Resources and Socio-Cultural Developments in the Iberian Chalcolithic, 257-272. Tübingen. University of Tübingen |date=2017 |last1=Sanjuán |first1=Leonardo García |last2=Bartelheim |first2=Martin}} Circular earth and timber enclosures are also known from Germany, Ireland and the Netherlands in this period, as well as Stonehenge in England.

File:Museo arqueologico Asturias discos de oro.JPG|Gold discs from western Asturias, Spain.{{cite book |url= https://www.academia.edu/13916725 |title=The Bell Beaker transition in Europe: Mobility and local evolution during the 3rd millenium BC |date=2015 |publisher=Oxbow Books |chapter=Early gold technology as an indicator of circulation processes in Atlantic Europe |last1=Armbruster |first1=Barbara |pages=140–149}}

File:Cuentas de collar, puñal, punzón y puntas de jabalina. Bronce Antiguo.jpg|Bracelet, metal dagger, awl and javelin points, Spain

File:Cazuela (26798289912).jpg|Ceramic dish from Ciempozuelos

File:Braçal de arqueiro, verso, Idade do Bronze.jpg|Gold wristguard from Vila Nova de Cerveira, Portugal.

File:Bellbeaker-Palmela points.jpg|Metal javelin points, Castro of Vila Nova de São Pedro, Portugal

File:Gold pendants1.png|Gold pendants, Portugal

File:Els Reguers de Seró-4.JPG|Barrow with cist made of stone slabs from older statue-menhirs. Spain, 2879-2589 BC

File:Dolmen de la Pastora 1.png|Dolmen de la Pastora, Spain.{{cite journal |journal=Journal of World Prehistory |date=2018 |last=García Sanjuán |first=Leonardo |title=Assembling the Dead, Gathering the Living: Radiocarbon Dating and Bayesian Modelling for Copper Age Valencina de la Concepción (Seville, Spain) |volume=31 |issue=2 |pages=179–313 |doi=10.1007/s10963-018-9114-2 |pmid=29962659 |pmc=5984651}}

File:Vaso campaniforme (15851359423).jpg on the base.{{cite journal |last=Valera |first=António Carlos |title=Ciempozuelos beaker geometric patterns: A glimpse into their meaning |date=October 2015 |journal=Apontamentos de Arqueologia e Património |volume=10 |publisher=Era-Arqueologia / Núcleo de Investigação Arqueológica |location=Lisbon |issn=2183-0924 |url= https://www.academia.edu/11396725 |via=Academia.edu |url-access=registration}}|121x121px]]

Radiocarbon dating currently indicates a 1,200-year duration for the use of the Beaker pottery on the Balearic Islands, between about 2475 and 1300 BC.(Waldren and Van Strydonck 1996). Some evidence exists of all-corded pottery in Mallorca, generally considered the most ancient Bell Beaker pottery, possibly indicating an even earlier Beaker settlement at {{C.|2700}} BC.{{cite journal |last1=Trias |first1=Manuel Calvo |last2=Guerrero Ayuso |first2=Víctor M. |last3=Simonet |first3=Bartomeu Salvà |date=2002 |title=Los orígenes del poblamiento balear: Una discusión no acabada |language=es |journal=Complutum |volume=13 |pages=159–191 |issn=1131-6993 |url= http://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/CMPL/article/viewFile/CMPL0202110159A/29695}} However, in several regions, this type of pottery persisted long enough to permit other possibilities. Suárez Otero (1997) postulated this corded Beakers entered the Mediterranean by routes both through the Atlantic coast and eastern France. Bell Beaker pottery has been found in Mallorca and Formentera, but has not been observed in Menorca or Ibiza. Collective burials in dolmen structures in Ibiza could be contrasted against the individual burials in Mallorca. In its latest phase ({{C.}}1750–1300 cal BC) the local Beaker context became associated with the distinctive ornamented Boquique pottery{{cite journal |last=Waldren |first=William H. |title=Evidence of Iberian Bronze Age 'boquique' pottery in the Balearic Islands: Trade, marriage or culture? |journal=Oxford Journal of Archaeology |volume=22 |issue=4 |pages=357–374 |doi=10.1046/j.1468-0092.2003.00193.x |date=2003 |url= http://www.briegull.com/waldren/waldren2/bouquique.html |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20090606170429/http://www.briegull.com/waldren/waldren2/bouquique.html |archive-date=6 June 2009|url-access=subscription }} demonstrating clear maritime links with the (megalithic) coastal regions of Catalonia, also assessed to be directly related to the late Cogotas complex. In most of the areas of the mainland, Boquique pottery falls into the latter stages of the Bell Beaker complex, as well. Along with other evidence during the earlier Beaker period in the Balearics, {{circa|2400–2000 BC}}, as shown by the local presence of elephant ivory objects together with significant Beaker pottery and other finds,(Waldren 1979 and Waldren 1998), this maritime interaction can be shown to have a long tradition. The abundance of different cultural elements that persisted towards the end of the Bronze Age, show a clear continuity of different regional and intrusive traditions.

The presence of perforated Beaker pottery, traditionally considered to be used for making cheese, at Son Ferrandell-Oleza (Waldren 1998: 95) and at Coval Simó (Coll 2000), confirms the introduction of production and conservation of dairy. Also, the presence of spindles at sites like Son Ferrandell-Oleza (Waldren 1998: 94) or Es Velar d'Aprop (Carreras y Covas 1984) point to knowledge of making thread and textiles from wool. However, more details on the strategies for tending and slaughtering the domestic animals involved are forthcoming. Being traditionally associated with the introduction of metallurgy, the first traces of copper working in the Balearics were also clearly associated with Bell Beakers.

{{see also|Únětice culture}}

File:Gold Lunula1.png from Lower Saxony, Germany.{{cite book |url= https://www.academia.edu/1222120 |title=Der Griff nach den Sternen - Wie Europas Eliten zu Macht und Reichtum kamen, 591-602. Halle: Tagungen des Landesmuseums für Vorgeschichte Halle |date=2010 |chapter=From Dorchester to Dieskau – some aspects of relations between Britain and Central Europe during the Early Bronze Age |last=O'Connor |first=Brendan |editor-last1=Meller |editor-first1=Harald |editor-last2=Bertemes |editor-first2=Francoise}}{{cite web |url= https://kulturerbe.niedersachsen.de/piresolver?id=record_kuniweb_676046 |title=Gold lunula from Schulenburg |quote=this crescent-shaped golden necklace from the beginning of the third millennium BC is extremely rare evidence of contact between early Bronze Age elites in Central Europe, Great Britain and Ireland, as it is possible that the find was imported from Ireland at the time. To date, 69 golden lunulae (Latin lunula = small moon), as the necklace is also called because of its shape, have been found in Ireland alone. The Schulenburg gold jewellery consists of almost pure gold, which was probably driven into a thin sheet by hammering a gold rod, then ground and finally polished. The striking similarity to the crescent moon indicates a corresponding symbolic meaning of this gold jewellery.}}]]

In their large-scale study on radiocarbon dating of the Bell Beakers, J. Müller and S. Willingen established that the Bell Beaker Culture in Central Europe started c. 2500 BC.{{cite book |last1=Müller |first1=Johannes |last2=van Willigen |first2=Samuel |date=2001 |contribution=New radiocarbon evidence for European Bell Beakers and the consequences for the diffusion of the Bell Beaker Phenomenon |editor1-last=Nicolis |editor1-first=Franco |title=Bell Beakers today: Pottery, people, culture, symbols in prehistoric Europe: Proceedings of the international colloquium Riva del Garda (Trento, Italy), 11–16 May 1998, Volume 1 |place=Trento |publisher=Provincia Autonoma di Trento |isbn=9788886602433 |pages=59–80}} Two great coexisting and separate Central European cultures – the Corded Ware with its regional groups and the Eastern Group of the Bell Beaker Culture – form the background to the Late Copper Age and Early Bronze Age. The Makó-Kosihy-Čaka culture, indigenous to the Carpathians, may be included as a third component.{{cite book |last1=Bertemes |first1=François |last2=Heyd |first2=Volker |date=2002 |chapter=Der Übergang Kupferzeit / Frühbronzezeit am Nordwestrand des Karpatenbeckens – Kulturgeschichtliche und paläometallurgische Betrachtungen |trans-chapter=The transition from the Copper Age to the Early Bronze Age at the north-western edge of the Carpathian basin culture historical and palaeometallurgical considerations |editor1-last=Bartelheim |editor1-first=Martin |editor2-last=Pernicka |editor2-first=Ernst |editor3-last=Krause |editor3-first=Rüdiger |title=Die Anfänge der Metallurgie in der alten Welt |trans-title=The beginnings of metallurgy in the old world |publisher=Verlag Marie Leidorf |place=Rahden |isbn=9783896468710 |pages=185–228 |chapter-url= https://www.academia.edu/2773090 |language=de}} Their development, diffusion and long-range changes are determined by the great river systems.

File:Bell Beaker gold 1.jpg

The Bell Beaker settlements are still little known, and have proved remarkably difficult for archaeologists to identify. This allows a modern view of them to contradict results of anthropologic research. The late 20th century view was that the Bell Beaker people, far from being the "warlike invaders" as once described by Gordon Childe (1940), added rather than replaced local late Neolithic traditions into a cultural package and as such did not always and evenly abandon all local traditions.{{cite book |last=Darvill |first=T. |date=2002 |title=Oxford Concise Dictionary of Archaeology |chapter=Beaker culture |page=[https://archive.org/details/conciseoxforddic0000darv/page/42 42] |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=9780192116499 |chapter-url= https://archive.org/details/conciseoxforddic0000darv/page/42}} More recent extensive DNA evidence, however, suggests a significant replacement of earlier populations.{{cite journal |last1=Brotherton |first1=Paul |date=2013 |title=Neolithic mitochondrial haplogroup H genomes and the genetic origins of Europeans |journal=Nature Communications |volume=4 |pages=1764 |doi=10.1038/ncomms2656 |pmid=23612305 |pmc=3978205 |first2=Wolfgang |last2=Haak |display-authors=1 |last3=Templeton |first3=Jennifer |last4=Brandt |first4=Guido |last5=Soubrier |first5=Julien |last6=Jane Adler |first6=Christina |last7=Richards |first7=Stephen M. |last8=Sarkissian |first8=Clio Der |last9=Ganslmeier |first9=Robert | last10=Friederich | first10=Susanne |last11=Dresely |first11=Veit |last12=Van Oven |first12=Mannis |last13=Kenyon |first13=Rosalie |last14=Van Der Hoek |first14=Mark B. |last15=Korlach |first15=Jonas |last16=Luong |first16=Khai |last17=Ho |first17=Simon Y. W. |last18=Quintana-Murci |first18=Lluis |last19=Behar |first19=Doron M. | last20=Meller | first20=Harald |last21=Alt |first21=Kurt W. |last22=Cooper |first22=Alan |last23=Adhikarla |first23=Syama |last24=Ganesh Prasad |first24=Arun Kumar |last25=Pitchappan |first25=Ramasamy |last26=Varatharajan Santhakumari |first26=Arun |last27=Balanovska |first27=Elena |last28=Balanovsky |first28=Oleg |last29=Bertranpetit |first29=Jaume | last30=Comas | first30=David |bibcode=2013NatCo...4.1764.}} A notable example of a well excavated and documented settlement is Albertfalva in Hungary, dating from 2470 to 1950 BC.{{cite web |url=https://www.academia.edu/28360047 |title=A Bell Beaker settlement in Albertfalva, Hungary (2470–1950 BC) |website=Budapest History Museum |date=2016}}

Bell Beaker domestic ware has no predecessors in Bohemia and Southern Germany, shows no genetic relation to the local Late Copper Age Corded Ware, nor to other cultures in the area, and is considered something completely new. The Bell Beaker domestic ware of Southern Germany is not as closely related to the Corded Ware as would be indicated by their burial rites. Settlements link the Southern German Bell Beaker culture to the seven regional provinces of the Eastern Group, represented by many settlement traces, especially from Moravia and the Hungarian Bell Beaker-Csepel group being the most important. In 2002, one of the largest Bell Beaker cemeteries in Central Europe was discovered at Hoštice za Hanou (Moravia, Czech Republic).[http://www.muni.cz/research/projects/1863 Anthropology of skeletal remains of Bell – Beaker people from Moravia (Czech Republic)]

The relationship to the western Bell Beakers groups, and the contemporary cultures of the Carpathian basin to the south east, is much less.{{cite book |last1=Heyd |first1=V. |last2=Husty |first2=L. |last3=Kreiner |first3=L. |date=2004 |title=Siedlungen der Glockenbecherkultur in Süddeutschland und Mitteleuropa |trans-title=Bell Beaker settlements in South Germany and Central Europe |publisher=Faustus |place=Büchenbach |isbn=9783933474278 |language=de}} Research in northern Poland shifted the north-eastern frontier of this complex to the western parts of the Baltic with the adjacent Northern European plain. Typical Bell Beaker fragments from the site of Ostrikovac-Djura at the Serbian river Morava were presented at the Riva del Garda conference in 1998, some 100 km south-east of the Csepel Beaker sub-group (modern Hungary). Bell Beaker related material has now been uncovered in a line from the Baltic Sea down to the Adriatic and the Ionian Sea, including the modern states comprising Belarus, Poland, Romania, Serbia, Montenegro, Croatia, Albania, North Macedonia and parts of Greece.[http://www.bris.ac.uk/archanth/staff/heyd/Krakow1.pdf The Eastern Border of the Bell Beaker-Phenomenon – Volker Heyd, 2004]

File:Nußdorf ob der Traisen - Urzeitmuseum - 07b.jpg

The Bell Beaker culture settlements in southern Germany and in the East-Group show evidence of mixed farming and animal husbandry, and indicators such as millstones and spindle whorls prove the sedentary character of the Bell Beaker people, and the durability of their settlements. Some especially well equipped child-burials seem to indicate sense of predestined social position, indicating a socially complex society. However, analysis of grave furnishing, position within the cemetery, and size and deepness of grave pits did not lead to any strong conclusions on the social divisions.

File:Early Bronze Age longhouse, Germany.jpg

The Late Copper Age is regarded as a continuous culture system connecting the Upper Rhine valley to the western edge of the Carpathian Basin. Late Copper Age 1 was defined in southern Germany by the connection of the late Cham Culture, Globular Amphora culture, and the older Corded Ware Culture of "beaker group 1" that is also referred to as Horizon A or Step A. Early Bell Beaker Culture intruded into the region at the end of the Late Copper Age 1, around 2600–2550 BC. Middle Bell Beaker corresponds to Late Copper Age 2 and here an east–west Bell Beaker cultural gradient became visible through the difference in the distribution of the groups of beakers with and without handles, cups and bowls, in the three regions Austria–Western Hungary, the Danube catchment area of Southern Germany, and the Upper Rhine/lake Constance/Eastern Switzerland area for all subsequent Bell Beaker periods.{{cite book |last=Heyd |first=Volker |date=2000 |title=Die Spätkupferzeit in Süddeutschland |trans-title=The Late Copper age in Southern Germany |publisher=Habelt |place=Bonn |isbn=9783774930483 |language=de}} This middle Bell Beaker Culture is the main period when almost all the cemeteries in Southern Germany begin. Younger Bell Beaker Culture of Early Bronze Age shows analogies to the Proto-Únětice Culture in Moravia and the Early Nagyrév Culture of the Carpathian Basin.

During the Bell Beaker period, a border ran through southern Germany, which culturally divided a northern from a southern area. The northern area was oriented around the Rhine and the Bell Beaker West Group, while the southern area occupied much of the Danube river system and was mainly settled by the homogeneous Bell Beaker East Group. This latter group overlapped with the Corded Ware Culture and other groups of the Late Neolithic and early Bronze Age. Nevertheless, southern Germany shows some independent developments of itself.

File:Pommelte Ring1.png circular enclosure, Germany, {{Circa|2300 BC}}.{{cite web |url= https://static.dw.com/image/52990360_906.jpg |title=Aerial view of the Pommelte enclosure |website=Deutsche Welle |date=2020}}{{cite journal |last1=Spatzier |first1=Andre |last2=Bertemes |first2=Francois |title=The ring sanctuary of Pömmelte, Germany: A monumental, multi-layered metaphor of the late third millennium BC |date=June 2018 |journal=Antiquity |volume=92 |issue=363 |pages=655–673 |doi=10.15184/aqy.2018.92 |doi-access=free |s2cid=165852387}}{{Cite web |title=Stonehenge's Continental Cousin |url= https://www.archaeology.org/issues/411-2101/letter-from/9295-germany-woodhenge |website=Archaeology |date=January 2021}}{{cite web |url= https://www.landesmuseum-vorgeschichte.de/en/temporary-exhibitions/the-world-of-the-nebra-sky-disc-new-horizons/overview/themes.html#&gid=lightbox-group-2472&pid=4 |title=The World of the Nebra Sky Disc |website=Landesmuseum-Vorgeschichte.de |publisher=Halle State Museum of Prehistory}}]]

Although a broadly parallel evolution with early, middle, and younger Bell Beaker Culture was detected, the Southern Germany middle Bell Beaker development of metope decorations and stamp and furrow engraving techniques do not appear on beakers in Austria-Western Hungary, and handled beakers are completely absent. It is contemporary to Corded Ware in the vicinity, that has been attested by associated finds of middle Corded Ware (chronologically referred to as "beaker group 2" or Step B) and younger Geiselgasteig Corded Ware beakers ("beaker group 3" or Step C). Bell Beaker Culture in Bavaria used a specific type of copper, which is characterised by combinations of trace elements. This same type of copper was spread over the area of the Bell Beaker East Group.

Previously some archaeologists considered the Bell-beaker people to have lived only within a limited territory of the Carpathian Basin and for a short time, without mixing with the local population. Although there are very few evaluable anthropological finds, the appearance of the characteristic planoccipital (flattened back) Taurid type in the populations of some later cultures (e.g. Kisapostag and Gáta–Wieselburg cultures) suggested a mixture with the local population contradicting such archaeological theories. According to archaeology, the populational groups of the Bell-beakers also took part in the formation of the Gáta-Wieselburg culture on the western fringes of the Carpathian Basin, which could be confirmed with the anthropological Bell Beaker series in Moravia and Germany. In accordance with anthropological evidence, it has been concluded the Bell Beakers intruded in an already established form the southern part of Germany as much as the East Group area.

Around 2300 BC, large circular enclosures were built at Pömmelte and nearby Schönebeck in central Germany. These were important ritual sites which remained in use until {{C.|1900}} BC.{{cite book |last=Spatzier |first=André |contribution=The enclosure complex Pömmelte–Schönebeck: The dialectic of two circular monuments of the late 3rd to early 2nd millennium BC in Central Germany |editor-last1=Bertemes |editor-first1=F. |editor-last2=Meller |editor-first2=H. |title=Der Aufbruch zu neuen Horizonten. NeueSichtweisen zur europäischen Frühbronzezeit |date=2019 |publisher=Landesmuseums für Vorgeschichte Halle |isbn=9783948618032 |pages=421–443 |url= https://www.academia.edu/43296057 |via=Academia.edu |url-access=registration |quote=the Pömmelte–Schönebeck complex can be best understood as a sacral landscape in which the two enclosures were focal points standing in dialectic relation to each other. This sacral landscape began to be established in the early 3rd millennium BC with a small sanctuary and a burial of a warrior-leader of the Corded Ware Culture.}}{{cite journal |url= https://www.academia.edu/39283180 |journal=Acta Archaeologica |volume=90 |issue=1 |date=2019 |title=Princes, Armies, Sanctuaries - The emergence of complex authority in the Central German Únětice culture |last=Meller |first=Harald |pages=39–79}} The main entrances of the Pömmelte enclosure were oriented towards sunrise and sunset midway between the solstices and equinoxes, indicating that Pömmelte served as a monument for "ceremonies linked to calendrical rites and seasonal feasting". The Pömmelte and Schönebeck enclosures formed parts of a 'sacral landscape' with origins in an early 3rd millennium BC sanctuary and elite burial of the Corded Ware culture. The Pömmelte enclosure also has an almost identical diameter and a similar ground plan to Stonehenge in England.{{cite AV media |url= https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0dlijsmVJ9c&t=942s |title=Concepts of cosmos in the world of Stonehenge |website=British Museum |date=2022}} According to excavators the two monuments were built by "the same culture" with "the same view of the world". The largest known Early Bronze Age settlement in central Europe was built next to the Pömmelte enclosure, belonging to the early phase of the Únětice culture. The remains of 130 large timber houses have been found on the site; they were typically 20 metres in length with some up to 30.5 metres in length, and with floor areas ranging from 80m² to 360m².{{cite web |title=Discovery Map around and about the Pömmelte Ring Sanctuary |url=https://www.landesmuseum-vorgeschichte.de/fileadmin/landesmuseum/alle/pdf/pdf_himmelswege/poemmelte_discovery_map.pdf |website=landesmuseum-vorgeschichte.de}}{{cite web |date=2021 |title=Archaeologists discovered 130 dwellings around the Ringheiligtum Pömmelte monument "German Stonehenge" |url=https://arkeonews.net/archaeologists-discovered-130-dwellings-around-the-ringheiligtum-pommelte-monument-german-stonehenge/ |website=arkeonews.net}}

A timber henge-like ritual structure has also been excavated at Poysbrunn in Lower Austria.{{cite web |url=https://www.academia.edu/41680043 |title='Henge'-like monument and burial site of the Bell Beaker Culture in Poysbrunn, Lower Austria. |last1=Czene |first1=András |work=„Henge“-artiges Denkmal und Bestattungsplatz der Glockenbecherkultur in Poysbrunn |date=2019}}

File:Beaker 2.jpg|Bell Beaker from the Czech Republic

File:Dagger rock carving from Le Petit Chasseur in Sion, Switzerland.png|Dagger carving from Le Petit-Chasseur, Switzerland

File:Dagger1a.png|Metal dagger from Brandenburg, Germany.{{cite journal |last1=Clément |first1=Nicolas |date=27 January 2020 |title=Bell Beaker copper-alloy daggers from central Europe |url= https://journals.openedition.org/pm/2167#tocto2n5 |journal=Préhistoires Méditerranéennes |issue=8 |doi=10.4000/pm.2167 |s2cid=248017237}}

File:Bell Beaker ceramics from Bohemia, Moravia and Slovakia.png|Ceramics from Bohemia, Moravia and Slovakia

File:Gold discs 1a.png|Gold discs from Eythra, Germany

File:Bell Beaker wristguards 1.jpg|Stone wrist-guards from Central Europe

File:Százhalombatta régészeti park1.jpg|House reconstruction, Csepel group, Hungary.{{cite book |url= https://www.researchgate.net/publication/255791946 |title=Handbook of Archaeoastronomy and Ethnoastronomy |date=2015 |chapter=Neolithic Longhouses and Bronze Age Houses in Central Europe |pages=1307–1315 |last1=Pasztor |first1=Emilia |last2=Barna |first2=Judit |bibcode=2015hae..book.....R |editor-last1=Ruggles |editor-first1=CLN}}

File:Halle (Saale), Landesmuseum für Vorgeschichte, Glockenbecherkultur.jpg|Pottery and implements, Germany

File:Anthropomorphic stele no 1, Sion, Petit-Chasseur necropolis 08.jpg|Stone stele, Switzerland

{{Further information|Prehistoric Ireland#Copper and Bronze Ages (2500–500 BC)}}

File:Blessington lunula.BM.WG.31 (cropped).jpg from Blessington, {{Circa|2400 BC}}|166x166px]]

Beakers arrived in Ireland {{C.|2500}} BC and fell out of use {{C.|1700}} BC. The beaker pottery of Ireland was rarely used as a grave good, but is often found in domestic assemblages from the period. This stands in contrast to the rest of Europe where it is frequently found in both roles. The inhabitants of Ireland used food vessels as a grave good instead. The large, communal passage tombs of the Irish Neolithic were no longer being constructed during the Early Bronze Age (although some, such as Newgrange were re-used{{cite book |last=O'Kelly |first=M. J. |date=1982 |title=Newgrange: Archaeology, Art and Legend |place=London |publisher=Thames & Hudson}}). The preferred method of burial seems to have been single graves and cists in the east, or in small wedge tombs in the west. Cremation was also common.

The advent of the Bronze Age Beaker culture in Ireland is accompanied by the destruction of smaller satellite tombs at Knowth{{sfn|Flanagan|1998|p=71}} and collapses of the great cairn at Newgrange,{{sfn|Flanagan|1998|p=99}} marking an end to the Neolithic culture of megalithic passage tombs.

Beakers are found in large numbers in Ireland, and the technical innovation of ring-built pottery indicates that the makers were also present.{{sfn|Flanagan|1998|p=78}} Classification of pottery in Ireland and Britain has distinguished a total of seven intrusive{{sfn|Flanagan|1998|p=82}} beaker groups originating from the continent and three groups of purely insular character having evolved from them. Five out of seven of the intrusive Beaker groups also appear in Ireland: the European bell group, the All-over cord beakers, the Scottish/North Rhine beakers, the Northern British/Middle Rhine beakers and the Wessex/Middle Rhine beakers. However, many of the features or innovations of Beaker society in Britain never reached Ireland.{{sfn|Flanagan|1998|p=81}} Instead, quite different customs predominated in the Irish record that were apparently influenced by the traditions of the earlier inhabitants.{{sfn|Flanagan|1998|pp=94–95}} Some features that are found elsewhere in association to later types{{sfn|Flanagan|1998|p=84}} of Earlier Bronze Age Beaker pottery, indeed spread to Ireland, however, without being incorporated into the same close and specific association of Irish Beaker context.{{sfn|Flanagan|1998|p=85}} The Wessex/Middle Rhine gold discs bearing "wheel and cross" motifs that were probably sewn to garments, presumably to indicate status and reminiscent of racquet headed pins found in Eastern Europe,{{sfn|Flanagan|1998|pp=86–88}} enjoy a general distribution throughout the country, however, never in direct association with beakers.

In 1984, a Beaker period copper dagger blade was recovered from the Sillees River near Ross Lough, County Fermanagh, Northern Ireland.{{cite journal |last1=Sheridan |first1=Alison |last2=Northover |first2=Peter |date=1993 |title=A Beaker Period copper dagger blade from the Sillees River near Ross Lough, Co. Fermanagh |journal=Ulster Journal of Archaeology |volume=56 |series=3rd series |pages=61–69 |jstor=20568187}} The flat, triangular-shaped copper blade was {{convert|171|mm|2|abbr=on}} long, with bevelled edges and a pointed tip, and featured an integral tang that accepted a riveted handle. Flint arrow-heads and copper-blade daggers with handle tangs, found in association with Beaker pottery in many other parts of Europe, have a date later than the initial phase of Beaker People activity in Ireland.{{sfn|Flanagan|1998|p=88}} Also the typical Beaker wristguards seem to have entered Ireland by cultural diffusion only, after the first intrusions, and unlike English and Continental Beaker burials never made it to the graves. The same lack of typical Beaker association applies to the about thirty found stone battle axes. A gold ornament found in County Down that closely resembles a pair of ear-rings from Ermegeira, Portugal, has a composition that suggests it was imported.{{sfn|Flanagan|1998|p=88}} Incidental finds suggest links to non-British Beaker territories, like a fragment of a bronze blade in County Londonderry that has been likened to the "palmella" points of Iberia,{{sfn|Flanagan|1998|p=82}} even though the relative scarcity of beakers, and Beaker-compatible material of any kind, in the south-west are regarded as an obstacle to any colonisation directly from Iberia, or even from France.{{sfn|Flanagan|1998|p=82}} Their greater concentration in the northern part of the country,{{sfn|Flanagan|1998|p=78}} which traditionally is regarded as the part of Ireland least blessed with sources of copper,{{citation needed|date=December 2016}} has led many authorities to question the role of Beaker People in the introduction of metallurgy to Ireland. However, indications of their use of stream sediment copper, low in traces of lead and arsenic, and Beaker finds connected to mining and metalworking at Ross Island, County Kerry, provide an escape to such doubts.{{sfn|Flanagan|1998|p=89}}

File:Lunula d'oro e due dischi d'oro, da coggalbeg, co. roscommon, 2200-1800 ac ca.jpg

The featured "food vessels" and cinerary urns (encrusted, collared and cordoned) of the Irish Earlier Bronze Age have strong roots in the western European Beaker tradition. Recently, the concept of these food vessels was discarded and replaced by a concept of two different traditions that rely on typology: the bowl tradition and the vase tradition, the bowl tradition being the oldest{{sfn|Flanagan|1998|p=104}} as it has been found inserted in existing Neolithic (pre-beaker) tombs, both court tombs and passage tombs. The bowl tradition occurs over the whole country except the south-west and feature a majority of pit graves, both in flat cemeteries and mounds, and a high incidence of uncremated skeletons, often in crouched position.{{sfn|Flanagan|1998|pp=104–105, 111–114}} The vase tradition has a general distribution and feature almost exclusively cremation. The flexed skeleton of a man 1.88 meters tall in a cist in a slightly oval round cairn with "food vessel" at Cornaclery, County Londonderry, was described in the 1942 excavation report as "typifying the race of Beaker Folk",Male sizes range between {{convert|157|and|191|cm|0|abbr=on}}, to average {{convert|174|cm|0|abbr=on}}, comparable to the current male population: Flanagan 1998, p. 116 although the differences between Irish finds and e.g. the British combination of "round barrows with crouched, unburnt burials" make it difficult to establishes the exact nature of the Beaker People's colonization of Ireland.{{sfn|Flanagan|1998|p=81}}

File:Newgrange henge 19.jpg, Ireland, {{Circa|2000 BC}}]]

In general, the early Irish Beaker intrusions do not attest{{sfn|Flanagan|1998|pp=84–85, 116}} the overall "Beaker package" of innovations that, once fully developed, swept Europe elsewhere, leaving Ireland behind.{{sfn|Flanagan|1998|p=133}} The Irish Beaker period is characterised by the earliness{{sfn|Flanagan|1998|p=88}} of Beaker intrusions, by isolation{{sfn|Flanagan|1998|p=88}} and by influences and surviving traditions of autochthons.{{sfn|Flanagan|1998|p=91}}

Beaker culture introduces the practice of burial in single graves, suggesting an Earlier Bronze Age social organisation of family groups.{{sfn|Flanagan|1998|p=150}} Towards the Later Bronze Age the sites move to potentially fortifiable hilltops, suggesting a more "clan"-type structure.{{sfn|Flanagan|1998|p=158}} Although the typical Bell Beaker practice of crouched burial has been observed,{{sfn|Flanagan|1998|pp=96, 151}} cremation was readily adopted{{sfn|Flanagan|1998|pp=105–106}} in accordance with the previous tradition of the autochthons.{{sfn|Flanagan|1998|p=71}} In a tumulus the find of the extended skeleton of a woman accompanied by the remains of a red deer and a small seven-year-old stallion is noteworthy, including the hint to a Diana-like religion.{{sfn|Flanagan|1998|p=156}} A few burials seem to indicate social status, though in other contexts an emphasis to special skills is more likely.{{sfn|Flanagan|1998|p=155}}

One of the most important sites in Ireland during the Beaker period is Ross Island. A series of copper mines from here are the earliest known in Ireland, starting from {{C.|2500}} BC (O'Brien 2004). A comparison of chemical traces and lead isotope analysis from these mines with copper artefacts strongly suggests that Ross Island was the sole source of copper in Ireland between the dates 2500–2200 BC. In addition, two thirds of copper artefacts from Britain also display the same chemical and isotopic signature, strongly suggesting that Irish copper was a major export to Britain.{{cite journal |last1=Northover |first1=J. P. N. |last2=O'Brien |first2=W. |last3=Stos |first3=S. |date=2001 |title=Lead isotopes and metal circulation in Beaker/Early Bronze Age Ireland |journal=Journal of Irish Archaeology |volume=10 |pages=25–47}} Traces of Ross Island copper can be found even further afield; in the Netherlands it makes up 12% of analysed copper artefacts, and Brittany 6% of analysed copper artefacts{{cite journal |last=Northover |first=J. P. |date=1999 |title=The earliest metalworking in South Britain |editor1=Hauptmann, A. |editor2=Pernicka, E. |editor3=Rehren, T. |editor4=Yalçin, Ü. |journal=The Beginnings of Metallurgy |place=Bochum |publisher=Dt. Bergbau-Museum |pages=211–225}} After 2200 BC there is greater chemical variation in British and Irish copper artefacts, which tallies well with the appearance of other mines in southern Ireland and north Wales. After 2000 BC, other copper sources supersede Ross Island. The latest workings from the Ross Island mines is dated to around 1700 BC.

File:Copper Halberd Replica.jpg.{{cite journal |url= https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/ojoa.12250 |journal=Oxford Journal of Archaeology |volume=41 |issue=3 |date=2022 |title=Atlantic halberds as Bell Beaker weapons in Iberia |last1=Garrido-Pena |first1=Rafael |pages=252–277 |doi=10.1111/ojoa.12250 |hdl=10486/703276 |s2cid=249560008 |quote=Atlantic halberds are characteristic weapons of the beginning of the Early Bronze Age in western Europe .... Some scholars support an origin in Ireland |hdl-access=free}}|161x161px]]

As well as exporting raw copper/bronze, there were some technical and cultural developments in Ireland that had an important impact on other areas of Europe. Irish food vessels were adopted in northern Britain in {{C.|2200}} BC and this roughly coincides with a decline in the use of beakers in Britain. The 'bronze halberd' (not to be confused with the medieval halberd) was a weapon in use in Ireland from {{C.}}2400–2000 BC. They are essentially broad blades that were mounted horizontally on a meter long handle, giving greater reach and impact than any known contemporary weapon.{{cite journal |last1=O'Flaherty |first1=R. |date=2007 |title=A weapon of choice: Experiments with a replica Irish early Bronze Age halberd |journal=Antiquity |volume=81 |issue=312 |pages=425–434 |doi=10.1017/s0003598x00095284 |s2cid=160489266}} They were subsequently widely adopted in other parts of Europe,{{cite journal |last1=Schuhmacher |first1=T. X. |date=2002 |title=Some remarks on the origin and chronology of halberds in Europe |journal=Oxford Journal of Archaeology |volume=21 |issue=3 |pages=263–288 |doi=10.1111/1468-0092.00162}} possibly showing a change in the technology of warfare.{{cite book |last=James |first=Simon |date=1993 |title=Exploring the World of the Celts |place=London |publisher=Thames & Hudson |isbn=9780500279984 |page=21}}

Ireland has the greatest concentration of gold lunulae and stone wrist-guards in Europe. However, neither of these items were deposited in graves and they tend to be found isolated and at random.

In some cases gold lunulae have been found with pairs of gold discs, e.g. at Coggalbeg in Ireland and Cabeceiras de Basto in Portugal.{{cite web |url= https://www.calameo.com/read/003812115bb1f846d66fa |title=Under the Protection of Lunules |website=D&M Magazine, Europe |page=19 |date=2019}}{{cite web |url= https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-zf9mCpKldFI/Wk05JGSfuaI/AAAAAAAAKxg/ibOzkybr1YkkyoEJLWWcM3xJhWyP8n2LQCLcBGAs/s1600/portugese%2Blinula.jpg |title=Gold lunula and discs from Cabeceiras de Basto, Portugal}} Both lunulae and discs have been linked to sun worship.{{Cite web |last=Urbanus |first=Jason |date=2015 |title=Bronze Age Ireland's Taste in Gold |url= https://www.archaeology.org/issues/188-1509/trenches/3578-trenches-bronze-age-ireland-gold2 |access-date=26 April 2022 |website=Archaeology}} The archaeologist Mary Cahill connects them to a "great solar cult" stretching across western and central Europe to Scandinavia. Cahill suggests that the central part of the lunulae (which is left undecorated) represents a solar boat, which she compares to the gold boat depicted on the Nebra sky disc and to depictions of solar boats from the Nordic Bronze Age, as well as to depictions on pottery from Los Millares in Spain. According to Cahill, pairs of gold discs found with lunulae may therefore represent "the day and night sun", symbolising the movement of the sun from day to night and from east to west. The double-sun motif has also been linked to the mythological Divine Twins,{{cite journal |last=Kristiansen |first=Kristian |title=Rock Art and Religion The sun journey in Indo-European mythology and Bronze Age rock art |date=2012 |journal=Adoranten 2012 |pages=69–86 |url= https://www.rockartscandinavia.com/images/articles/a12kristiansen.pdf |via=RockArtScandinavia.com}}{{cite book |last=Lahelma |first=Antti |chapter=The Circumpolar Context of the 'Sun Ship' Motif in South Scandinavian Rock Art |editor-last1=Skoglund |editor-first1=Peter |editor-last2=Ling |editor-first2=Johan |editor-last3=Bertilsson |editor-first3=Ulf |title=North Meets South: Theoretical Aspects on the Northern and Southern Rock Art Traditions in Scandinavia |date=2017 |publisher=Oxbow Books |pages=144–171 |url= https://www.academia.edu/36843380 |via=Academia.edu |url-access=registration}} as have ritual depositions of twinned objects, including two swords buried with the Nebra sky disc.{{cite book |last=Kristiansen |first=Kristian |chapter=Bridging India and Scandinavia: Institutional Transmission and Elite Conquest during the Bronze Age |date=2011 |editor-last1=Wilkinson |editor-first1=Toby C. |editor-last2=Sherratt |editor-first2=Susan |editor-last3=Bennet |editor-first3=John |title=Interweaving Worlds: Systemic Interactions in Eurasia, 7th to 1st Millennia B C |publisher=Oxbow Books |pages=243–265 |url= https://www.academia.edu/1133755 |via=Academia.edu |url-access=registration}}

Scientific analyses have shown that gold used to make both the Irish lunulae and the Nebra sky disc originated from Cornwall, providing a further link between these artefacts.{{cite journal |last1=Ehser |first1=Anja |last2=Borg |first2=Gregor |last3=Pernicka |first3=Ernst |title=Provenance of the gold of the Early Bronze Age Nebra Sky Disk, central Germany: Geochemical characterization of natural gold from Cornwall |date=August 2011 |journal=European Journal of Mineralogy |volume=23 |issue=6 |pages=895–910 |doi=10.1127/0935-1221/2011/0023-2140 |bibcode=2011EJMin..23..895E |url= https://www.academia.edu/2107117 |via=Academia.edu |url-access=registration}} Cornwall was also the likely source of gold used to make artefacts from the Bush Barrow at Stonehenge.{{Cite web |date=2019 |title=Where did the gold from the time of Stonehenge come from? Analysing the Bush Barrow dagger |url= https://www.wiltshiremuseum.org.uk/news-articles/bush-barrow-dagger-gold-studs/ |access-date=26 April 2022 |website=Wiltshire Museum}} Gold used to make discs from western Asturias (northern Spain) dating from the Bell Beaker period, was similarly found to be of non-local origin and possibly from southern Britain.{{cite journal |last=Fernandez Moreno |first=José Javier |journal=Zephyrus |volume=82 |issue=65 |date=2018 |title=The gold discs of the Archaeological Museum of Asturias: Some observations on prehistoric goldsmithing |pages=65–92 |doi=10.14201/zephyrus2018826592 |s2cid=239596297 |doi-access=free |hdl=10651/50763 |hdl-access=free |url= https://www.researchgate.net/publication/329379461}}

File:Lunula d'oro, da ross, contea di westmeath, 2000 ac ca.jpg|Gold lunula from Westmeath, {{Circa|2000 BC}}

File:Ireland dagger 2.jpg|Bronze dagger, {{Circa|1900 BC}}

File:Lunula d'oro, dai dintorni di athlone, co. di roscommon, 2000 ac ca.jpg|Gold lunula, {{C.|2000}} BC

File:Gold ornaments, Bell Beaker culture, Ireland, 2200-1800 BC.jpg|Gold ornaments, {{Circa|2200 BC}}{{cite book |url= https://www.sidestone.com/books/the-beaker-phenomenon |title=THE BEAKER PHENOMENON? Understanding the character and context of social practices in Ireland 2500-2000 BC |date=3 December 2018 |pages=193|isbn=978-90-8890-463-9 |last1=Carlin |first1=Neil |publisher=Sidestone Press }}

File:Bacinella in ceramica, da grange, co. di roscommon, 2200-1800 ac ca.jpg|Bell Beaker ceramic, {{Circa|2200 BC}}

File:Bracers2.png|Stone wristguards

File:Kilmuckridge gold discs.jpg|Gold discs, 2500-2000 BC

File:Early Bronze Age copper flat axe of Type Ballybeg - Roseisle (FindID 454451).jpg|Copper axe, {{C.}}2300-2000 BC

File:UlsterMuseumPrehistorybr (5) (cropped) 1.png|Model of an early Bronze Age house, County Down

{{further|Bronze Age Britain}}

File:Silbury 1.jpg, England, {{Circa|2400 BC}}]]

Beakers arrived in Britain in {{C.}}2500 BC, with migrations of Corded Ware-related people, eventually resulting in a near total turnover of the British population.{{Cite web |last=Köljing |first=Cecilia |date=21 February 2018 |title=Ancient DNA reveals impact of the "Beaker Phenomenon" on prehistoric Europeans |url= https://www.gu.se/english/research/news-detail//ancient-dna-reveals-impact-of-the--beaker-phenomenon--on-prehistoric-europeans.cid1553932 |url-status=dead |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20190523190223/https://www.gu.se/english/research/news-detail//ancient-dna-reveals-impact-of-the--beaker-phenomenon--on-prehistoric-europeans.cid1553932 |archive-date=23 May 2019 |website=University of Gothenburg}} The Beaker-culture declined in use {{C.}}2200–2100 BC with the emergence of food vessels and cinerary urns and finally fell out of use around 1700 BC.{{cite journal |last1=Needham |first1=S. |date=1996 |title=Chronology and periodisation in the British Bronze Age |journal=Acta Archaeologica |volume=67 |pages=121–140}} The earliest British beakers were similar to those from the Rhine,{{cite journal |last1=Needham |first1=S. |date=2005 |title=Transforming Beaker culture in North-west Europe: Processes of fusion and fission |journal=Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society |volume=71 |pages=171–217 |doi=10.1017/s0079497x00001006 |s2cid=193226917}} but later styles are most similar to those from Ireland.{{cite journal |last1=Case |first1=H. |date=1993 |title=Beakers: Deconstruction and After |journal=Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society |volume=59 |pages=241–268 |doi=10.1017/s0079497x00003807}} In Britain, domestic assemblages from this period are very rare, making it hard to draw conclusions about many aspects of society. Most British beakers come from funerary contexts.

Britain's only unique export in this period is thought to be tin. It was probably gathered in streams in Cornwall and Devon as cassiterite pebbles and traded in this raw, unrefined state.{{cite journal |last=Charles |first=J. A. |date=1975 |title=Where is the Tin? |journal=Antiquity |volume=49 |issue=193 |pages=19–24 |doi=10.1017/S0003598X00063201 |s2cid=162722576}} South West England has the earliest evidence for tin ore exploitation in Europe.{{cite journal |last1=Williams |first1=R. Alan |display-authors=etal |date=2025 |title=From Land's End to the Levant: did Britain's tin sources transform the Bronze Age in Europe and the Mediterranean? |url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/antiquity/article/from-lands-end-to-the-levant-did-britains-tin-sources-transform-the-bronze-age-in-europe-and-the-mediterranean/2330F3B6498B210DA61B89026A1F38EA |journal=Antiquity |pages=1-19 |doi=10.15184/aqy.2025.41}} Other possible European sources of tin are located in Brittany and Iberia, but it is not thought they were exploited so early as these areas did not have bronze until after it was well established in Britain and Ireland.{{sfn|Bradley|2007|p=146}} Tin was used to turn copper into bronze from {{C.|2200}} BC and widely traded throughout Britain and into Ireland and continental Europe. Britain was the first region in Europe to fully adopt tin-bronze technology and switch all metalwork from copper and arsenical bronze to full tin-bronze, in the period 2200-2100 BC.{{cite journal |last1=Williams |first1=R. Alan |display-authors=etal |date=2025 |title=From Land's End to the Levant: did Britain's tin sources transform the Bronze Age in Europe and the Mediterranean? |url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/antiquity/article/from-lands-end-to-the-levant-did-britains-tin-sources-transform-the-bronze-age-in-europe-and-the-mediterranean/2330F3B6498B210DA61B89026A1F38EA |journal=Antiquity |pages=1-19 |doi=10.15184/aqy.2025.41}} This full adoption subsequently occurred across Scandinavia and Central Europe by around 1800 BC and later in southern Iberia, the Aegean (Greece) and Egypt by around 1500/1300 BC. Gold was also exported from Cornwall to Ireland and continental Europe.

File:Stonehenge2007 07 30.jpg, England, {{Circa|2500 BC}}]]

The most famous site in Britain from this period is Stonehenge, which had its Neolithic form elaborated extensively. Many barrows surround it and an unusual number of 'rich' burials can be found nearby, such as the Amesbury Archer and the later Bush Barrow.

Close similarities have been noted between Stonehenge and the Pömmelte circular enclosure in central Germany, which was built by Bell Beaker people around 2300 BC. Large timber circles in Britain such as Woodhenge, near to Stonehenge, are similarly dated to the early Beaker period or just before the Beaker period.{{cite journal |url= https://journals.openedition.org/pm/2286 |title=Beakers in Britain. The Beaker package reviewed |date=2020 |last=Gibson |first=Alex |journal=Préhistoires méditerranéennes|issue=8 |doi=10.4000/pm.2286 }}{{cite journal |url= https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/antiquity/article/abs/timber-circle-at-sarnybryncaled-welshpool-powys-ritual-and-sacrifice-in-bronze-age-midwales/CEE544656B0F401216379752055B7F8C |title=The timber circle at Sarn-y-Bryn-Caled, Welshpool, Powys: Ritual and sacrifice in Bronze Age mid-Wales |date=1992|doi=10.1017/S0003598X00081060 |last1=Gibson |first1=Alex |journal=Antiquity |volume=66 |issue=250 |pages=84–92 |url-access=subscription }} Some researchers have suggested that Woodhenge may have been a monumental roofed building, though it is usually thought to have been an open-air structure.{{cite journal |url= https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/27437 |journal=Reports of the Research Committee of the Society of Antiquaries of London, XXIX |date=1971 |title=Durrington Walls: Excavations 1966–1968 |last1=Wainwright |first1=G. J. |last2=Longworth |first2=I. H. |pages=373|hdl=20.500.12657/27437 |isbn=978-0-85431-218-4 }}{{cite web |url= https://www.english-heritage.org.uk/visit/places/woodhenge/history/ |title=History of Woodhenge |website=English Heritage}} Silbury Hill was also built in the early Bell Beaker period,{{Cite journal |last1=Armit |first1=Ian |last2=Reich |first2=David |date=2021 |title=The return of the Beaker folk? Rethinking migration and population change in British prehistory |journal=Antiquity |volume=95 |issue=384 |pages=1464–1477 |doi=10.15184/aqy.2021.129 |s2cid=239626106 |doi-access=free|pmid=39524147 |pmc=11550864 }} and may have originally been a burial mound, though this has never been proven.{{cite book |url= https://www.persee.fr/doc/mom_2259-4884_2012_act_58_1_3444 |title=Ancestral Landscapes: Burial mounds in the Copper and Bronze Ages. Proceedings of the International Conference held in Udine, May 15th-18th 2008 |chapter=The Tumulus in European Prehistory: Covering the Body, Housing the Soul |last=Harding |first=Anthony |editor-last1=Borgna |editor-first1=Elizabetta |editor-last2=Müller Celka |editor-first2=Sylvie |date=2012 |publisher=Maison de l'Orient |isbn=978-2-35668-022-8 |pages=23 |quote=There are cases where the practice of building a barrow could be carried to extreme lengths. The pyramids of the Old Kingdom of Egypt are essentially barrows, of a special sort; maybe Silbury Hill near Marlborough in southern England was a burial mound, though this has never been proven.}}{{cite journal |url= https://fphil.uniba.sk/en/musarch/archiv/1-1/ |journal=Musaica Archaeologica |volume=1 |issue=1 |title=The Beaker World and Otherness of the Early Civilizations |last=Turek |first=Jan |date=June 2016 |pages=155–162 |quote=on the British and Irish islands the Bell Beaker communities have created monuments such as the late phase of construction of Stonehenge shrine or a giant burial mound of Silbury Hill, which are comparable with Egyptian temples and pyramids.}}

According to Bayliss (2007), the "aggrandisement" of both Stonehenge and Silbury Hill occurred "in close relation to the appearance of novel material culture and practices" introduced by Beaker people.{{Cite journal |last1=Bayliss |first1=Alex |last2=McAvoy |first2=Fachtna |last3=Whittle |first3=Alisdair |title=The world recreated: Redating Silbury Hill in its monumental landscape |date=2007 |journal=Antiquity |volume=81 |issue=311 |pages=26–53 |doi=10.1017/S0003598X00094825 |s2cid=161443252 |url=https://www.academia.edu/22007675 |via=Academia.edu |url-access=registration}} The archaeologist Mike Parker Pearson has noted that a significantly higher level of labour mobilisation was achieved following the arrival of Beaker people in Britain{{cite AV media |title=Mike Parker Pearson, 'The New Archaeology of Stonehenge' (2021) |url= https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XMMeM_hlYa8&t=4343s}} The amount of effort that went into building Silbury Hill was "massively more than Stonehenge", and its dates coincide exactly with the appearance of Beaker burials.{{cite AV media |title=Mike Parker Pearson, 'The New Archaeology of Stonehenge' (2021) |url= https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XMMeM_hlYa8&t=4674s}} Beaker people also introduced mummification,{{cite journal |journal=Antiquity |volume=89 |issue=347 |date=2015 |title=Mummification in Bronze Age Britain |last1=Booth |first1=Thomas J. |pages=1155–1173 |doi=10.15184/aqy.2015.111 |s2cid=161304254 |doi-access=free}}{{Cite journal |last=Smith |first=Allen |date=2016 |title=Holding on to the past: Southern British evidence for mummification and retention of the dead in the Chalcolithic and Bronze Age |url=https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10064047/ |journal=Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports |volume=10 |pages=744–756 |doi=10.1016/j.jasrep.2016.05.034 |bibcode=2016JArSR..10..744S}} burial in log coffins{{Cite journal |last=Melton |first=Nigel |date=2015 |title=Gristhorpe Man: An early Bronze Age log-coffin burial scientifically defined |journal=Antiquity |volume=84 |issue=325 |pages=796–815 |doi=10.1017/S0003598X00100237 |s2cid=53412188 |hdl=10036/4426 |hdl-access=free |url= https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/antiquity/article/abs/gristhorpe-man-an-early-bronze-age-logcoffin-burial-scientifically-defined/3F0A3F55ED92061F9267836FFCB80EBE}}{{cite journal |journal=Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society |date=2023 |title=The Early Bronze Age Log Coffin Burials of Britain: The Origins and Development of a Burial Rite(s) |last1=Jones |first1=A. |volume=89 |pages=51–81 |doi=10.1017/ppr.2023.5 |doi-access=free}} and cranial deformation to Britain.{{cite AV media |title=Mike Parker Pearson, 'The New Archaeology of Stonehenge' (2021) |url= https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XMMeM_hlYa8&t=4615s}}

The archaeologist Timothy Darvill has argued that Stonehenge functioned as a solar calendar, reflecting the spread of solar cosmologies across Northern Europe in the third millennium BC.{{cite journal |journal=Antiquity |volume=96 |issue=386 |date=2022 |title=Keeping time at Stonehenge |last=Darvill |first=Timothy |pages=319–335 |doi=10.15184/aqy.2022.5 |s2cid=247336130 |doi-access=free}}{{cite AV media |url= https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bf-syRpDadI |title=Keeping Time at Stonehenge: A Megalithic Calendar Revealed |last=Darvill |first=Timothy |date=2023}} Darvill has also suggested that the Stonehenge trilithons may have represented twin gods or an early form of the Divine Twins.{{cite journal |last=Darvill |first=Timothy |title=Houses of the holy: Architecture and meaning in the structure of Stonehenge, Wiltshire, UK |journal=Time and Mind |volume=9 |issue=2 |date=2016 |pages=89–121 |doi=10.1080/1751696X.2016.1171496 |s2cid=164201703 |url= https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/1751696X.2016.1171496 |quote=each of the trilithons could be considered conjoined deities, pairs of gods, or an early form of the Divine Twins born at the same time from a single union (Darvill 2006, 144–145). The Great Trilithon to the southwest is the largest and most prominent. It is set astride the principal axis and might cautiously be identified with a pair of deities representing day and night, the sun and moon, summer and winter, life and death, perhaps even the prehistoric equivalents of the twins Apollo and Artemis as they are known in later pantheons across the Old World.|url-access=subscription }} Other researchers have emphasized the lunar aspects of Stonehenge, such as the apparent alignment of the Station Stone rectangle with the Major Lunar Standstill, which occurs every 18.6 years.{{cite web |url=https://www.english-heritage.org.uk/visit/places/stonehenge/things-to-do/major-lunar-standstill/ |website=English Heritage |title=Major Lunar Standstill}} Various other astronomical interpretations have been proposed, such as the theory put forward by astronomers Gerald Hawkins and Fred Hoyle that the ring of 56 Aubrey Holes could have been used to predict lunar eclipses.{{cite book |url=https://archive.org/details/stonehengedecode00gera/page/132/mode/2up |title=Stonehenge Decoded |date=1965 |publisher=Barnes and Noble Books |pages=132 |last=Hawkins |first=Gerald|isbn=978-0-88029-147-7 }}{{cite book |url=https://archive.org/details/onstonehenge0000unse/page/52/mode/2up |title=On Stonehenge |date=1977 |publisher=W.H. Freeman |pages=53 |last=Hoyle |first=Fred}}

Another site of particular interest in this period is Ferriby on the Humber Estuary, where Europe's oldest sewn-plank boats were recovered, dating from as early as 2030 BC.{{cite news |title=Bronze Age boat 'oldest in Europe' |work=BBC News |access-date=18 March 2015 |url= http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/1234529.stm}}{{cite journal |url=https://ore.exeter.ac.uk/repository/bitstream/handle/10036/20060/Argonauts%20of%20the%20North%20Sea.pdf?sequence=2&isAllowed=y |journal=Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society |volume=72 |title=Argonauts of the North Sea - a Social Maritime Archaeology for the 2nd Millennium BC |date=2006| last=Van der Noort |first=Robert |pages=267–287|doi=10.1017/S0079497X00000852 }} These are the oldest known sewn-plank boats in the world outside of Egypt.{{cite journal |last=Chapman |first=Henry P. |title=Seascapes and Landscapes: The siting of the Ferriby boat finds in the context of prehistoric pilotage |journal=International Journal of Nautical Archaeology |volume=34 |issue=1 |date=2021 |pages=43–50 |doi=10.1111/j.1095-9270.2005.00042.x |s2cid=162318244 |url= https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1095-9270.2005.00042.x|url-access=subscription }}{{cite journal |last1=Wright |first1=E. V. |last2=Churchill |first2=D. M. |title=The boats from North Ferriby, Yorkshire, England, with a review of the origins of the sewn boats of the Bronze Age |journal=Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society |volume=31 |date=1965 |pages=1–24 |doi=10.1017/S0079497X00014687 |s2cid=130511731 |url= https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/proceedings-of-the-prehistoric-society/article/abs/boats-from-north-ferriby-yorkshire-england-with-a-review-of-the-origins-of-the-sewn-boats-of-the-bronze-age/6B284CE6DEFB2B5CDDC5CB4C46CD090D|url-access=subscription }} A later example is the Dover Boat from southern England, dating from 1550 BC.{{cite book |last=Clark |first=Peter |title=The Dover Bronze Age Boat in Context: Society and Water Transport in Prehistoric Europe |date=2004 |publisher=Oxbow Books |isbn=9781842171394 |url= https://www.oxbowbooks.com/oxbow/the-dover-bronze-age-boat-in-context.html |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20230427153555/https://www.oxbowbooks.com/oxbow/the-dover-bronze-age-boat-in-context.html |archive-date=27 April 2023}}

File:Bell Beaker 1a.jpg|Beaker, wrist-guard with gold studs, copper dagger and toggle.{{Cite web |title=wrist-guard |website=British Museum Online |url= https://www.britishmuseum.org/collection/object/H_1975-0901-3}}

File:St Juliot lunula 2.jpg|Gold lunula from Cornwall, {{Circa|2400 BC}}.{{Cite web |title=Lunula |website=British Museum Online |url= https://www.britishmuseum.org/collection/object/H_1838-0519-1}}{{Cite web |title=Gold lunula |website=NMS.ac.uk |publisher=National Museums Scotland |url= https://www.nms.ac.uk/explore-our-collections/collection-search-results/lunula/133051}}

File:Daggers1.png|alt=|Metal daggers

File:Gold lunula from Llanllyfni, Wales, 2400-2000 BC (2).jpg|alt=Gold lunula, Wales, 2400-2000 BC.[119]|Gold lunula, Wales, 2400-2000 BC.{{cite web |title=Gold lunula |website=British Museum Online |url= https://www.britishmuseum.org/collection/object/H_1869-0619-1}}

File:Ferriby boat model and replica tools.jpg|Ferriby boat, {{Circa|2000 BC}}, model and replica tools

File:BB Gold.png|Gold discs and ornaments{{cite web |title=ornament |website=British Museum Online |url= https://www.britishmuseum.org/collection/object/H_1940-0404-2}}

File:Bronze Age log coffin burial, reconstruction.jpg|Log coffin burial, reconstruction.

File:Bell Beaker 1, Britain.png|Beaker

File:Bell Beakers from England.png|Decorated Bell Beakers, England

{{See also|Copper Age Italy}}

File:Mappa Italia vaso campaniforme.jpg

The Italian Peninsula saw a distinctive pattern of Bell Beaker adoption during the late Copper Age (approximately 2500–2200 BCE). Unlike other regions of Europe where the Bell Beaker phenomenon represented a more significant cultural shift, in Italy these elements were selectively incorporated into existing cultural traditions. The most affected areas were the Po Valley, particularly the area surrounding Lake Garda, and Tuscany, though Bell Beaker materials have been found throughout northern and central Italy.Nicolis, F. (2001). Bell Beakers Today: Pottery, People, Culture, Symbols in Prehistoric Europe. Servizio Beni Culturali Ufficio Beni Archeologici, pp. 207-210.

The Bell Beaker cultural elements appear in central and northern Italy as "foreign elements" that were integrated into the pre-existing Remedello and Rinaldone cultures, rather than representing a complete cultural replacement.Le grandi avventure dell'archeologia Vol. 5: Europa e Italia protostorica – Curcio editore, pp. 1585–1586 The regional distributions show significant variation:

• In Lombardy and the central Po Valley, Bell Beaker materials often appear alongside Remedello culture artifacts, suggesting a period of cultural exchange rather than population replacement.
• In Tuscany and parts of Lazio, Bell Beaker elements were incorporated into the existing Rinaldone culture, particularly visible in ceramic styles and burial practices.

File:Una delle stele antropomorfe custodite nel Museo dell'area megalitica di Saint-Martin-de-Corleans ad Aosta.jpg, Italy|215x215px]]

Significant Bell Beaker graves and artifacts have been discovered across northern and central Italy:

• In the Brescia area, the grave of Ca' di Marco (Fiesse) contained distinctive Bell Beaker pottery and copper daggers, demonstrating the characteristic "package" of Bell Beaker material culture.Barfield, L.H. (1994). "The Bronze Age of Northern Italy: Recent Work and Social Interpretation". In Mathers, C. and Stoddart, S. (eds.) Development and Decline in the Mediterranean Bronze Age. Sheffield: J.R. Collis Publications, pp. 129-144.
• In Viterbo, the tomb complex of Fosso Conicchio yielded bell-shaped vessels alongside local pottery types, exemplifying the integration of Bell Beaker elements with indigenous traditions.Fugazzola Delpino, M.A. (1999). "Il complesso culturale di 'Fosso Conicchio' (Viterbo)". Bullettino di Paletnologia Italiana, 90(VIII), pp. 181-304.
• At Sesto Fiorentino near Florence, Bell Beaker materials have been found in settlement contexts, providing insight into domestic life beyond the more common funerary discoveries.Sarti, L. and Martini, F. (2000). "Insediamenti e artigianati dell'età del bronzo in area fiorentina: le ricerche archeologiche nei cantieri CONSIAG (1996-1999)". Firenze: Millenni, Studi di archeologia preistorica 2.
• The Lunigiana region between Tuscany and Liguria has yielded several Bell Beaker sites, including the noteworthy finds at Pianaccia di Suvero, which show connections to both Italian and French Bell Beaker traditions.Maggi, R. (1998). "Aspetti della preistoria della Liguria orientale". Istituto Internazionale di Studi Liguri, Bordighera, pp. 127-136.

The Bell Beaker material culture in Italy displayed several distinctive characteristics:

• Ceramics typically followed the classic Bell Beaker forms but often incorporated local decorative elements and manufacturing techniques.
• Metallurgical evidence suggests that Bell Beaker communities played a significant role in the development and spread of copper and early bronze technology throughout the peninsula.
• Distinctive Bell Beaker items such as wrist-guards (archer's bracers), V-perforated buttons, and copper daggers appear in graves but are frequently found alongside indigenous artifact types.De Marinis, R.C. (1997). "The Eneolithic Cemetery of Remedello Sotto (BS) and the Relative and Absolute Chronology of the Copper Age in Northern Italy". Notizie Archeologiche Bergomensi, 5, pp. 33-51.

The Bell Beaker phase in Italy was relatively short-lived compared to other regions of Europe, but its impact was significant for subsequent cultural developments. The Bell Beaker cultural phenomenon was followed by the Polada culture in northern Italy and the Proto-Apennine culture in central Italy.Carancini, G.L. (2001). "Origini e sviluppi della metallurgia in Italia". In Cardarelli, A., et al. (eds.) Le Terramare: La più antica civiltà padana. Milano: Electa, pp. 235-239. These subsequent cultures incorporated technological innovations and cultural practices that had been introduced or reinforced during the Bell Beaker period, particularly in metallurgy and interregional exchange networks.

File:Saint-Martin-de-Corléans 27082016-020 (25009270058).jpg|Anthropomorphic stele, Saint-Martin-de-Corléans

File:Milano - Museo archeologico - Masso di Bornio (2800-2400 a.C.), Valcamonica - Pugnali - Foto Giovanni Dall'Orto - 21-march-2005 - 02.jpg|Dagger petroglyphs from Val Camonica in northern Italy

File:Vaso campaniforme - Museo Sutermeister.jpg|Bell Beaker pottery from Castellanza in northern Italy

File:'Enigmatic tablet' 1.png|'Enigmatic tablet', associated with metallurgical activities{{cite book |url=https://www.academia.edu/87148971 |title=The Bell Beaker Culture in All its Forms. Proceedings of the 22nd Meeting of 'Archéologie et Gobelets' 2021 (Geneva, Switzerland) |date=2022 |publisher=Archaeopress |chapter=Bell Beaker and Epi-Bell Beaker in the Florentine Area: Metallurgical and Pottery Evidence from the Site of Fosso Di Lumino (Florence, Italy) |last=De Marco |first=Chiara |display-authors=etal |pages=3–17 |isbn=978-1-80327-363-1 |quote=Furthermore, the small but important repertoire of 'enigmatic tablets' from Fosso di Lumino – apparently indicating a connection with metallurgical activities as testified by other contexts – would document significant links between the Florentine area, Northern Italy and Central Europe.}}

File:Late Neolithic - Copper Age wattle-and-daub houses from Quadrato di Torre Spaccata, Rome.png|Copper Age houses in central Italy

The Beaker was introduced in Sicily from Sardinia and spread mainly in the north-west and south-west of the island. In the northwest and in the Palermo kept almost intact its cultural and social characteristics, while in the south-west there was a strong integration with local cultures.Tusa, Sebastiano (1999). La Sicilia nella Preistoria, Palermo: Sellerio Editore. {{ISBN|8838914400}} pp. 310–311 The only known single bell-shaped glass in eastern Sicily was found in Syracuse.

{{See also|Beaker culture in Sardinia}}In Sardinia, the Bell Beaker influence was more pronounced and long-lasting than on the Italian peninsula, contributing to the development of the local Bonnanaro culture.Tykot, R.H. (1999). "Islands in the Stream: Stone Age Cultural Dynamics in Sardinia and Corsica". In Tykot, R.H., et al. (eds.) Social Dynamics of the Prehistoric Central Mediterranean. London: Accordia Research Institute, pp. 67-82.File:Campaniforme Sardegna.jpg

Sardinia has been in contact with extra-insular communities in Corsica, Tuscany, Liguria and Provence since the Stone Age. From the late third millennium BC on, comb-impressed Beaker ware, as well as other Beaker material in Monte Claro contexts, has been found (mostly in burials, such as Domus de Janas), demonstrating continuing relationships with the western Mediterranean. Elsewhere, Beaker material has been found stratigraphically above Monte Claro and at the end of the Chalcolithic period in association with the related Bronze Age Bonnanaro culture (1800–1600 BC), for which C-14 dates calibrate to {{C.|2250}} BC. There is virtually no evidence in Sardinia of external contacts in the early second millennia, apart from late Beakers and close parallels between Bonnannaro pottery and that of the North Italian Polada culture.

Like elsewhere in Europe and in the Mediterranean area, the Bell Beaker culture in Sardinia (2100–1800 BC) is characterised by the typical ceramics decorated with overlaid horizontal bands and associated finds: brassards, V-pierced buttons, etc. For the first time, gold items appeared on the island (torc of the tomb of Bingia 'e Monti, Gonnostramatza{{cite thesis |last=Concu |first=Cristina |title=Bingia'e Monti – Gonnostramatza: Un sito archeologico tra l'età del Rame e l'età del Bronzo |language=it |trans-title=Bingia'e Monti – Gonnostramatza: An archaeological site between the Copper Age and the Bronze Age |type=baccalaureate |publisher=University of Cagliari |access-date=7 February 2024 |url= https://www.academia.edu/resource/work/40618826 |via=Academia.edu |url-access=registration}}). The different styles and decorations of the ceramics which succeed through the period allow the division of the Beaker culture in Sardinia into three chronological phases: A1 (2100–2000 BC), A2 (2000–1900 BC), and B (1900–1800 BC).Giovanni Ugas-L'alba dei Nuraghi (2005) p. 12 In these various phases is observable the succession of two components of different geographical origin: the first Franco-Iberian, and the second Central European.Ceramiche. Storia, linguaggio e prospettive in Sardegna, Maria Rosaria Manunza, p. 26{{full citation needed|date=September 2024|reason=This citation is too garbled to parse what its parts are intended to be. Put it in a citation template like everything else.}}

It appears likely that Sardinia was the intermediary that brought Beaker culture to Sicily.{{cite book |last=Piccolo |first=S. |date=2013 |title=Ancient Stones: The Prehistoric Dolmens of Sicily |place=Abingdon |publisher=Brazen Head Publishing |isbn=9780956510624 |page=32}}

File:Anghelu ruju-Tomba XX bis-DSC07795.jpg|Domus de Janas tomb, Sardinia

File:Campaniforme Anghelu Ruju.jpg|Beaker, necropolis of Anghelu Ruju, Sardinia

File:Eneolitico finale, cultura del vaso campaniforme, collana in denti di animale e conchiglie, da locci santus.jpg|Animal tooth necklace from the necropolis of Is Loccis-Santus, Sardinia

File:Vaso tetrapode cultura del vaso campaniforme.jpg|Tripod bowl, necropolis of Santu Pedru, Sardinia

File:Bell Beaker pottery from Monte d'Accoddi, Sardinia.png|Bell Beaker bowl from Monte d'Accoddi.{{cite journal |url= https://www.researchgate.net/publication/272651018 |journal=Documenta Praehistorica |volume=38 |issue=207 |title=Monte d'Accoddi and the end of the Neolithic in Sardinia (Italy) |last=Melis |first=Maria Grazia}}

File:Menhirmonted'accoddi.png|The site of Monte d'Accoddi was reused in the Beaker period

{{See also|Helladic chronology#Early Helladic (EH)}}

Bell Beaker artefacts appear in mainland Greece and the Aegean from {{C.}}2200–2000 BC. According to Heyd (2013) and Maran (1998) this is explained by the movement of people from the Adriatic Cetina culture into Greece at the transition from Early Helladic II to III. The Cetina culture was a "syncretistic Bell Beaker culture", splitting off from the Adriatic variant of the Vučedol culture and at the same time incorporating Bell Beaker elements related to those in northern Italy.{{cite book |last=Heyd |first=Volker |url= https://books.google.com/books?id=hefUAAAAQBAJ |title=The Oxford Handbook of the European Bronze Age |date=2013 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=9780199572861 |pages=47–67 |chapter=Chapter 3. Europe 2500 to 2200 BC: Between expiring ideologies and emerging complexity}}{{cite web |url= http://www.aegeobalkanprehistory.net/index.php?p=article&id_art=10 |title=When the West Meets the East: The Eastern Periphery of the Bell Beaker Phenomenon and Its Relation with the Aegean Early Bronze Age |website=Aegean and Balkan Prehistory |last1=Heyd |first1=Volker |date=2008}} Kristiansen and Larsson (2005) suggest that migrants from both the Adriatic Cetina culture and the Danube area reached Greece in this period, the latter indicated by close similarities in pottery forms to the Mokrin and Nagyrev cultures. New and more intensive exchange of goods subsequently developed after 1900 BC between Greece and Bell Beaker-derived cultures such as the Únětice culture in central Europe and the Wessex culture in Britain.{{cite book |last1=Kristiansen |first1=Kristian |url= https://books.google.com/books?id=di7Dc7Y1ETYC |title=The Rise of Bronze Age Society |last2=Larsson |first2=Thomas B. |publisher=Cambridge University Press |date=2005 |isbn=9780521843638 |pages=120}} According to Galaty et al. (2015) a 'warrior culture' including "ideas related to warrior aristocracy" spread from Europe to Greece through contact with the Cetina culture, along with the tradition of tumulus burial.{{cite book |last1=Galaty |first1=Michael |url= https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/cambridge-prehistory-of-the-bronze-and-iron-age-mediterranean/bronze-age-european-elites-from-the-aegean-to-the-adriatic-and-back-again/5D3E05137384435470F95A6B6C5EE65B |title=The Cambridge Prehistory of the Bronze and Iron Age Mediterranean |last2=Tomas |first2=Helen |last3=Parkinson |first3=William |date=2015 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |pages=157–177 |chapter=9 - Bronze Age European Elites: From the Aegean to the Adriatic and Back Again |doi=10.1017/CHO9781139028387.013 |isbn=9781139028387}}

Close similarities between megalithic tholos tombs in western Europe (such as the Tholos de Alcalar 7 and Tholos de El Romeral in Iberia), which were either reused or constructed by Bell Beaker people, and the later Mycenaean tholos tombs in Greece (such as the Treasury of Atreus), have prompted some archaeologists to suggest a western influence on, or origin for, the Mycenaean tombs.{{cite web |url=https://mupreva.org/dedalo/media/pdf/publicaciones/standar/mupreva194_mupreva153_406.pdf |title=The Middle Bronze Age |website=Museu de Prehistòria de València |last=Childe |first=Vere Gordon}}{{cite book |url=https://archive.org/details/beforecivilizati00renf/page/128/mode/2up |title=Before civilization |date=1979| publisher=Cambridge University Press |last=Renfrew |first=Colin |pages=128|isbn=978-0-521-29643-4 }}{{cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=W8coAAAAYAAJ |title=The realm of the great goddess; the story of the megalith builders |date=1961 |publisher=Prentice-Hall |last=von Reden |first=Sibylle |pages=203–204}}{{cite book |url=https://minerva-access.unimelb.edu.au/items/0e414912-0e37-56d9-b9ce-618a4f16effd |title=HESPEROS. The Aegean seen from the West |publisher=Peeters |date=2017 |chapter=Like Dolmen, Like Dromos: Contextualizing the Solar Orientations of Some Mycenaean Tholoi |last1=Davis |first1=B.E. |display-authors=etal}}

{{See also|Nordic Bronze Age|Nordic Stone Age}}

File:Gold lunula from Grevinge, Denmark 1.png, Denmark, {{C.}}2350-1950 BC.{{cite journal |last=Vandkilde |first=Helle |date=2007 |title=A Review of the Early Late Neolithic Period in Denmark |url= https://www.academia.edu/5116172 |journal=Offa |quote=The form and decoration of the Danish lunulae are dependent on Anglo-Irish lunulae, which can be attributed to the Beaker Culture of western Europe.}}|167x167px]]

In Denmark, large areas of forested land were cleared to be used for pasture and the growing of cereals during the Single Grave culture and in the Late Neolithic Period. Faint traces of Bell Beaker influence can be recognised already in the pottery of the Upper Grave phase of the Single Grave period, and even of the late Ground Grave phase, such as occasional use of AOO-like or zoned decoration and other typical ornamentation, while Bell Beaker associated objects such as wristguards and small copper trinkets, also found their way into this northern territories of the Corded Ware Culture. Domestic sites with Beakers only appear 200–300 years after the first appearance of Bell Beakers in Europe, at the early part of the Danish Late Neolithic Period (LN I) starting at 2350 BC. These sites are concentrated in northern Jutland around the Limfjord and on the Djursland peninsula, largely contemporary to the local Upper Grave Period. In east central Sweden and western Sweden, barbed wire decoration characterised the period 2460–1990 BC, linked to another Beaker derivation of northwestern Europe.

Three gold lunulae have been found in Denmark dating from the Bell Beaker period.{{cite journal |last=Vandkilde |first=Helle |date=2007 |title=A Review of the Early Late Neolithic Period in Denmark |url=https://www.academia.edu/5116172 |journal=Offa |quote=The form and decoration of the Danish lunulae are dependent on Anglo-Irish lunulae, which can be attributed to the Beaker Culture of western Europe.}}{{cite web |title=Gold lunula, Denmark |url=https://samlinger.natmus.dk/do/asset/2139 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230810232603/https://samlinger.natmus.dk/do/asset/2139 |archive-date=10 August 2023 |website=National Museum, Denmark}}

File:Late Neolithic – Early Bronze Age house, Vinge, Denmark, c. 1900 BC (2).jpg

Northern Jutland has abundant sources of high quality flint, which had previously attracted industrious mining, large-scale production, and the comprehensive exchange of flint objects: notably axes and chisels. The Danish Beaker period, however, was characterised by the manufacture of lanceolate flint daggers, described as a completely new material form without local antecedents in flint and clearly related to the style of daggers circulating elsewhere in Beaker dominated Europe. Presumably Beaker culture spread from here to the remainder of Denmark, and to other regions in Scandinavia and northern Germany as well. Central and eastern Denmark adopted this dagger fashion and, to a limited degree, also archer's equipment characteristic to Beaker culture, although here Beaker pottery remained less common. This period in Scandinavian prehistory, from 2400 to 1800 BC, is also known as the Dagger Period.{{cite web |url= https://en.natmus.dk/historical-knowledge/denmark/prehistoric-period-until-1050-ad/the-neolithic-period/the-hindsgavl-dagger/ |title=The Hindsgavl Dagger |website=National Museum of Denmark}}

File:Late Neolithic – Early Bronze Age house, Vinge, Denmark, c. 1900 BC (1).jpg

The spread of metallurgy in Denmark is also intimately related to the Beaker representation in northern Jutland. The LN I metalwork is distributed throughout most of Denmark, but a concentration of early copper and gold coincides with this core region, hence suggesting a connection between Beakers and the introduction of metallurgy. Most LN I metal objects are distinctly influenced by the western European Beaker metal industry, gold sheet ornaments and copper flat axes being the predominant metal objects. The LN I copper flat axes divide into As-Sb-Ni copper, recalling so-called Dutch Bell Beaker copper and the As-Ni copper found occasionally in British and Irish Beaker contexts, the mining region of Dutch Bell Beaker copper being perhaps Brittany; and the Early Bronze Age Singen (As-Sb-Ag-Ni) and Ösenring (As-Sb-Ag) coppers having a central European – probably Alpine – origin.

In eastern Denmark and Scania one-person graves occur primarily in flat grave cemeteries. This is a continuation of the burial custom characterising the Scanian Battle-axe Culture, often to continue into the early Late Neolithic. Also in northern Jutland, the body of the deceased was normally arranged lying on its back in an extended position, but a typical Bell Beaker contracted position occurs occasionally. Typical to northern Jutland, however, cremations have been reported, also outside the Beaker core area, once within the context of an almost full Bell Beaker equipment.

File:Building1.png

The introductory phase of the manufacture and use of flint daggers, {{C.|2350}} BC, must all in all be characterised as a period of social change. Apel argued that an institutionalised apprenticeship system must have existed.Apel 2001, 42, p. 323 ff Craftsmanship was transmitted by inheritance in certain families living in the vicinity of abundant resources of high-quality flint. Debbie Olausson's (1997) examinations indicate that flint knapping activities, particularly the manufacture of daggers, reflect a relatively low degree of craft specialisation, probably in the form of a division of labour between households.

Noteworthy was the adoption of European-style woven wool clothes kept together by pins and buttons in contrast to the earlier usage of clothing made of leather and plant fibres.Bender Jørgensen 1992, p. 114Ebbesen 1995; 2004 Two-aisled timber houses in Late Neolithic Denmark correspond to similar houses in southern Scandinavia and at least parts of central Scandinavia and lowland northern Germany. In Denmark, this mode of building houses is clearly rooted in a Middle Neolithic tradition. In general, Late Neolithic house building styles were shared over large areas of northern and central Europe.Nielsen 2000, pp. 161 ff. Towards the transition to LN II some farm houses became extraordinarily large.

Clusters of Late Neolithic Beaker presence similar to northern Jutland appear as pockets or "islands" of Beaker Culture in northern Europe, such as Mecklenburg, Schleswig-Holstein, and southern Norway.Struve 1955, pl. 22{{Full citation needed|date=August 2018}}Kühn 1979, pl. 11; 18{{Full citation needed|date=August 2018}}Myhre 1978-1979{{Full citation needed|date=August 2018}}Jacobs 1991{{Full citation needed|date=August 2018}}Prescott & Walderhaug 1995{{Full citation needed|date=August 2018}} In northern central Poland Beaker-like representations even occur in a contemporary EBA setting. The frequent occurrence of Beaker pottery in settlements points at a large-scaled form of social identity or cultural identity, or perhaps an ethnic identity.

File:Amber1.png|Amber, Denmark

File:Hindsgavldolken - Do 2010 3259.jpg|Hindsgavl flint dagger, Denmark, {{Circa|1900 BC}}

File:Bow-shaped pendant made from wild boar's tusk. Bell Beaker culture, Germany.png|Bow-shaped pendant, northern Germany.{{cite journal |url= https://www.academia.edu/403339 |journal=Acta Archaeologica Carpathica |volume=44 |date=2009 |title=Bow-shaped pendants of the Bell Beaker culture |last=Ružičková |first=Pavla |pages=37–72}}

File:Bronze axe, Denmark, c. 1950 BC.jpg|Bronze axe, Denmark, c. 1950 BC{{cite web |url=https://harja.dk/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Harja_Genstandstabel-Udg.-1.0.pdf |title=Genstandstabel for identificering, klassificering og datering af detektorgenstande (Abramsson 2018)}}{{cite web |url=https://www.academia.edu/14210096 |title=Cultural Perspectives on the Beginnings of the Nordic Bronze Age (Vandkilde 2010) |last1=Vandkilde |first1=Helle }}

File:Rock art images from western Norway; Bell Beaker culture, 1 Mjeltehaugen, Giske in Møre og Romsdal county, 2 Skjølingstad, Karmøy in Rogaland county, 3 Unneset, Askvoll, Vestland county.png|Stone steles with boat and cart images, Norway 3rd mill. BC{{cite web |url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/343302800 |title=Rock Art and Trade Networks: From Scandinavia to the Italian Alps (Melheim and Sand-Eriksen 2020)}}{{cite web |url=https://www.academia.edu/78207374 |title=Taking the Stranger on Board – The Two Maritime Legacies of Bronze Age Rock Art (Ling 2015)|work=North Meets South |date=January 2017 |last1=Ling |first1=Johan }}

{{See also|Prehistory of the Netherlands}}

File:Bell Beaker1a.jpg

The Beaker group in northern Jutland forms an integrated part of the western European Beaker Culture, while western Jutland provided a link between the Lower Rhine area and northern Jutland. The local fine-ware pottery of Beaker derivation reveal links with other Beaker regions in western Europe, most specifically the Veluwe group at the Lower Rhine (Netherlands). Concurrent introduction of metallurgy shows that some people must have crossed cultural boundaries. Danish Beakers are contemporary with the earliest Early Bronze Age (EBA) of the East Group of Bell Beakers in central Europe, and with the floruit of Beaker cultures of the West Group in western Europe. The latter comprise Veluwe and Epi-Maritime in Continental northwestern Europe and the Middle Style Beakers (Style 2) in insular western Europe.

The interaction between the Beaker groups on the Veluwe Plain and in Jutland must, at least initially, have been quite intensive. All-over ornamented (AOO) and All-over-corded (AOC), and particularly Maritime style beakers are featured, although from a fairly late context and possibly rather of Epi-maritime style, equivalent to the situation in the north of the Netherlands, where Maritime ornamentation continued after it ceased in the central region of Veluwe and were succeeded {{C.|2300}} BC by beakers of the Veluwe and Epi-Maritime style.

File:Boerderijen die gebouwd werden in de ijzertijd en bronstijd leken veel op elkaar Hunebedden centrum Borger.JPG

In 2023 a large circular enclosure dating from {{C.|2000}} BC was discovered near the town of Tiel in the province of Gelderland. Described as the "Stonehenge of the Netherlands", the enclosure consisted of earth banks and ditches with entrances aligned to the solstices and equinoxes. At the centre of the enclosure there was a burial mound containing numerous burials. According to the excavators the enclosure functioned as a solar calendar used to determine "important moments including festival and harvest days". Wooden longhouses and other burial mounds were found in the immediate vicinity of the site. A glass bead from Mesopotamia dating from {{C.|2000}} BC was also found in the enclosure, indicating that long-distance contacts already existed at this time.{{cite web |url= https://phys.org/news/2023-06-dutch-unveil-year-old-stonehenge-like-discovery.html |title=Dutch unveil 4,000-year-old 'Stonehenge'-like discovery |website=phys.org |date=21 June 2023}}{{cite web |url=https://www.sidestone.com/books/bronstijd-vuur-van-verandering |title=Bronstijd. Vuur van verandering |date=2024 |website=Sidestone Press |pages=111}}

A single gold lunula has been found in the Netherlands dating from the Bell Beaker period.{{cite journal |url= https://www.academia.edu/9838750 |title=The Bronze Age in the Low Countries |last=Fokkens |first=Harry |journal=Oxford Handbooks Online |date=2013}}

File:Beaker Netherlands 1.jpg|Bell Beaker, Netherlands

File:Bell Beaker Rijksmuseum of Oudheden.jpg|alt=|Bell Beaker ceramic, Netherlands

File:Bell Beaker Netherlands 3.jpg|Beaker, amber, metal and stone tools

File:Stone wristguard, Bell Beaker culture, Netherlands.png|Stone wristguard, Netherlands

File:Bellbeaker culture - flat axe head - Musée Unterlinden inv. no. Ao.87.jpg|Copper axe, Netherlands

File:Bellbeaker culture - polypod bowl and jug - Musée Unterlinden inv. nos. Ap.969, Ap.967.jpg|Footed bowl and jug

File:Fig. 10 GOLD ORNAMENT FROM BENNEKOM, Netherlands, Bell Beaker culture.png|Gold ornament from Bennekom, Netherlands{{cite web |url=https://www.sidestone.com/books/stereotype |title=Stereotype, p.185}}

The cultural concepts originally adopted from Beaker groups at the lower Rhine blended or integrated with local Late Neolithic Culture. For a while the region was set apart from central and eastern Denmark, that evidently related more closely to the early Únětice culture across the Baltic Sea. Before the turn of the millennium the typical Beaker features had gone, their total duration being 200–300 years at the most.

A similar picture of cultural integration is featured among Bell Beakers in central Europe, thus challenging previous theories of Bell Beakers as an elitist or purely super-structural phenomenon.cf. Shennan 1976; 1977{{cite book |last=Harrison |first=Richard J. |author-link=Richard J. Harrison (archaeologist) |date=1980 |title=The Beaker Folk |publisher=Thames & Hudson }}Thorpe & Richards 1984{{full citation needed|date=September 2024|reason=No "Thorpe & Richards 1984" source exists cited anywhere in this article.}}Lohof 1994{{full citation needed|date=September 2024|reason=No "Lohof 1994" source exists cited anywhere in this article.}}Strahm 1998{{full citation needed|date=September 2024|reason=No "Strahm 1998" source exists cited anywhere in this article, only Strahm 1995, which is something else.}} The connection with the East Group Beakers of Únětice had intensified considerably in LN II, thus triggering a new social transformation and innovations in metallurgy that would announce the actual beginning of the Northern Bronze Age.{{cite web |last=Vandkilde |first=Helle |date=2005 |title=A Review of the Early Late Neolithic Period in Denmark: Practice, Identity and Connectivity |work=Jungsteinsite (Journal of Neolithic Archeology) |publisher=Christian Albrecht University of Kiel |url= http://www.jungsteinsite.uni-kiel.de/pdf/2005_vandkilde_low.pdf |access-date=12 August 2014}}

{{div col}}

• Beaker (disambiguation)
• Amesbury Archer
• Prehistoric Britain
• Prehistoric Iberia
• Bronze Age Britain
• Cornish Bronze Age
• Indo-European migrations

{{div col end}}

{{notelist}}

{{reflist}}

{{refbegin}}

• {{cite book |last=Bradley |first=Richard |date=2007 |title=The prehistory of Britain and Ireland |publisher=Cambridge University Press |place=Cambridge |isbn=9780521848114}}

• {{cite book |last=Case |first=Humphrey |date=2007 |contribution=Beakers and the Beaker Culture |editor1-last=Burgess |editor1-first=Christopher |editor2-last=Topping |editor2-first=Peter |editor3-last=Lynch |editor3-first=Frances |title=Beyond Stonehenge: Essays on the Bronze Age in honour of Colin Burgess |publisher=Oxbow |location=Oxford |pages=237–254 |isbn=9781842172155}}
• {{cite book |last=Cunliffe |first=Barry |author-link=Barry Cunliffe |contribution=Chapter 1: Celticization from the West: The Contribution of Archaeology |editor1-last=Cunliffe |editor1-first=Barry |editor2-last=Koch |editor2-first=John T. |editor2-link=John T. Koch |title=Celtic from the West: Alternative Perspectives from Archaeology, Genetics, Language and Literature |date=2010 |publisher=Oxbow Books / Celtic Studies Publications |location=Oxford |isbn=9781842174104 |pages=27–31}}

• {{cite book |last=Fitzpatrick |first=A. P. |date=2013 |chapter=The arrival of the Beaker set in Britain and Ireland |editor1-last=Koch |editor1-first=John T. |editor1-link=John T. Koch |editor2-last=Cunliffe |editor2-first=Barry W. |editor2-link=Barry Cunliffe |title=Celtic from the West 2: Rethinking the Bronze Age and the Arrival of Indo-European in Atlantic Europe |publisher=Oxbow Books |place=Oxford |isbn=9781842175293 |page=44}}
• {{cite book |editor-last1=Fokkens |editor-first1=Harry |editor-last2=Nicolis |editor-first2=Franco |date=2012 |title=Background to Beakers: Inquiries in Regional Cultural Backgrounds of the Bell Beaker Complex |place=Leiden |publisher=Sidestone |isbn=9789088900846}}

• {{cite journal |last1=Harrison |first1=R. |last2=Heyd |first2=V. |date=2007 |title=The transformation of Europe in the third millennium BC: The example of 'Le Petit-Chasseur I + III' (Sion, Valais, Switzerland) |journal=Praehistorische Zeitschrift |volume=82 |issue=2 |pages=129–214 |doi=10.1515/pz.2007.010 |s2cid=161404297 |url= https://www.academia.edu/1249547}}
• {{cite book |last=Flanagan |first=Laurence |date=1998 |title=Ancient Ireland, Life before the Celts |place=Dublin |publisher=Gill & MacMillan |isbn=9780717124336}}

• {{cite book |last1=Müller |first1=Johannes |last2=Hinz |first2=Martin |last3=Ulrich |first3=Markus |date=2015 |title=The Bell Beaker Transition in Europe: Mobility and local evolution during the 3rd millennium BC |editor1=Maria Pilar Prieto Martinez |chapter=6. Bell Beakers – Chronology, innovation and memory: A multivariate approach |editor2=Laure Salanova |url= https://www.academia.edu/19633909}}

• {{Cite book |last=Piggot |first=Stuart |author-link=Stuart Piggott |title=Ancient Europe from the Beginnings of Agriculture to Classical Antiquity: A Survey |publisher=Aldine |date=1965 |isbn=9780202330020 |location=Chicago}}

{{refend}}

• {{cite book |last=Case |first=H. |date=2001 |chapter=The Beaker Culture in Britain and Ireland: Groups, European Contacts and Chronology |editor-last=Nicolis |editor-first=F. |title=Bell Beakers Today: Pottery, People, Culture, Symbols in Prehistoric Europe |volume=2 |place=Torento |publisher=Servizio Beni Culturali Ufficio Beni Archeologici |pages=361–377}}
• {{cite book |last1=Harding |first1=Anthony |last2=Fokkens |first2=Harry |title=The Oxford Handbook of European Bronze Age (Oxford Handbooks in Archaeology) |publisher=Oxford University Press |date=2013 |isbn=978-0199572861}}
• {{cite book |last=Mallory |first=J. P. |author-link=J. P. Mallory |date=1997 |chapter=Beaker Culture |title=Encyclopedia of Indo-European Culture |publisher=Fitzroy Dearborn}}
• {{cite news |last=Rincon |first=Paul |title=Making of Europe unlocked by DNA |url= https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-22252099 |work=BBC News |date=23 April 2013}}

{{Commons category|Bellbeaker culture}}

• [https://www.bbc.co.uk/history/ancient/british_prehistory/bronzeageman_01.shtml BBC – History – Bronze Age Britain]
• [http://ubprehistoire.free.fr/Le-Prof-Article1.html Historical model of settling and spread of Bell Beakers Culture in the mediterranean France]
• All Bell Beaker scientific articles on line [http://ubprehistoire.free.fr/Liens-Campaniforme.html free access]
• [https://phys.org/news/2024-01-evidence-patrilineal-descent-western-eurasian.html Evidence of a patrilineal descent system for western Eurasian Bell Beaker communities - Phys.org - January 29, 2024 ]
• [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/273123821_Walls_doors_and_towers_Fortified_settlements_in_the_south_and_centre_of_Portugal_some_notes_about_violence_and_walls_in_the_3rd_millenium_BCE Walls, doors and towers. Fortified settlements in the south and centre of Portugal (2013)]

{{Neolithic Europe}}

{{DEFAULTSORT:Beaker Culture}}