Bora Laskin

Laskin was born in Fort William, Ontario (now Thunder Bay), the son of Max Laskin and Bluma Zingel.{{Cite web|url=http://www.scc-csc.gc.ca/court-cour/judges-juges/bio-eng.aspx?id=bora-laskin|title=The Right Honourable Bora Laskin, P.C., C.C.|date=September 4, 2008|publisher=Supreme Court of Canada|access-date=November 23, 2016|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150924095157/http://www.scc-csc.gc.ca/court-cour/judges-juges/bio-eng.aspx?id=bora-laskin|archive-date=September 24, 2015}} His brother, Saul Laskin, went on to become the first mayor of Thunder Bay. His other brother, Charles, was a shirt designer and manufacturer.{{citation needed|date=September 2019}}

Laskin married Peggy Tenenbaum.[https://books.google.com/books?id=qSskAQAAIAAJ&q=laskin Eli Gottesman and Max Bookman, Who's Who in Canadian Jewry (Toronto: Jewish Institute for Higher Research, 1956), p. 24.] The couple had two children: John I. Laskin, who followed in his father's footsteps and became a judge at the Ontario Court of Appeal,{{citation|url=https://www.ontariocourts.ca/coa/judges-of-the-court/former-judges|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210919071148/https://www.ontariocourts.ca/coa/judges-of-the-court/former-judges|archive-date=2021-09-19|title=Former Judges of the Court of Appeal for Ontario|accessdate=2021-09-19|website=Court of Appeal for Ontario website}} and Barbara Laskin Plumptre.{{sfn|Girard|2005|p=xiii|ps= Bora Laskin's children, the Hon. John I. Laskin and Barbara Laskin Plumptre, have considered writing about their father, and I hope that one day they will publish a memoir of him.}} His grandson (the son of his daughter) carries on his name. His nephew John B. Laskin is a judge of the Federal Court of Appeal, having previously been a faculty member of the University of Toronto Faculty of Law and a prominent commercial litigator in Toronto.{{citation|newspaper=Toronto Star|url=https://www.thestar.com/news/canada/article/990935--harper-government-to-name-two-new-high-court-judges|date=2011-05-16|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200120104030/https://www.thestar.com/news/canada/2011/05/13/harper_government_to_name_two_new_high_court_judges.html|archive-date=2020-01-20|author1-last=MacCharles|author1-first=Tonda|title=Harper government to name two new high court judges|access-date=2011-05-16}}

Laskin was educated as a lawyer at Osgoode Hall Law School.{{Cite web|last=Vaughan|first=Frederick|date=2013-12-15|title=Bora Laskin|url=https://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/bora-laskin|access-date=2021-11-07|website=The Canadian Encyclopedia}} He initially studied at the University of Toronto, earning a Bachelor of Arts in 1933. He received the degrees of Master of Arts in 1935 and earned a Bachelor of Laws from the University of Toronto in 1936.{{cite web|url=http://www.scc-csc.gc.ca/court-cour/judges-juges/bio-eng.aspx?id=bora-laskin|title=Supreme Court of Canada - Biography - Bora Laskin|access-date=2015-06-06|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150418180455/http://scc-csc.gc.ca/court-cour/judges-juges/bio-eng.aspx?id=bora-laskin|archive-date=2015-04-18}}

While at the University of Toronto, he was a member of Sigma Alpha Mu fraternity.{{cite web |url=http://www.law.utoronto.ca/prosp_stdn_content.asp?itemPath=3/4/15/0/0&contentId=1299|title=The Hon. Bora Laskin: A Legendary Force at the University of Toronto|publisher=The University of Toronto Faculty of Law|access-date=2007-11-23|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070705184436/http://www.law.utoronto.ca/prosp_stdn_content.asp?itemPath=3%2F4%2F15%2F0%2F0&contentId=1299|archive-date=July 5, 2007}}

In 1937, he received a Master of Laws from Harvard Law School. He earned a gold medal at both the University of Toronto Law School and at Harvard Law School.Ian Binnie, [http://laskin.ca/e_tribute_not_published.html Tribute to Bora Laskin] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141006094018/http://laskin.ca/e_tribute_not_published.html|date=2014-10-06}}.

Despite his superior academic record, Laskin, who was Jewish, was unable to find work at any law firm of note, because of the anti-Semitism that pervaded the English-Canadian legal profession at the time. As a result, his first job after graduating was writing headnotes (i.e., article synopses) for the Canadian Abridgement, a legal research tool.

In order to be called to the bar, it was required that he serve articles with a lawyer who was already a member of the bar. He had trouble finding a lawyer who would serve as his principal, because non-Jewish lawyers would not accept Jewish students. Through connections, he eventually found a young Jewish lawyer, Sam Gotfrid, who was willing to sign as his principal, but Gotfrid was himself only just starting out and could not provide Laskin with any work or salary. A year into his articles, Laskin found a non-Jewish lawyer, W.C. Davidson, who was willing to take him as an articling student, and he finished his articles with Davidson. In later years, Laskin would say that he articled with Davidson, not mentioning his initial start with Gotfrid.{{sfn|Girard|2005|p=60}}

Ultimately, Laskin decided to pursue his career in academia. In 1940, he was hired by the University of Toronto (the post had initially been offered to John Kenneth Macalister, who turned it down in favour of serving in the military). Laskin taught at the University of Toronto until 1965 (except for the period 1945–1949, when he taught at Osgoode Hall Law School). For 23 years he was an associate editor of Dominion Law Reports and Canadian Criminal Cases. He also wrote Canadian Constitutional Law and other legal texts. His interests were in labour law, constitutional law, and human rights. He was a founding member of the Canadian Civil Liberties Association.{{sfn|Girard|2005|p=269}}

Laskin's non-academic practice involved primarily the area of labour and employment law, where he was known to have a kind heart and worked to advance the rights of trade unions. His most significant contributions were as a grievance arbitrator, where he made one of the greatest contributions to labour jurisprudence, with many of the legal concepts he developed finding their way into the broader field of law, especially human rights law which in the early days grew largely out of disputes in the workplace.

Many of Laskin's decisions are still referenced as leading cases of Canadian labour law and the University of Toronto's Centre for the Study of Industrial Relations awards the Bora Laskin Award in Labour Law annually to two lawyers who have made an outstanding contributions to Canadian labour law (one to union-side and one to employer-side).{{Cite web|date=2017-12-05|title=Bora Laskin Award|url=https://www.cirhr.utoronto.ca/cirhr-events/bora-laskin-award|access-date=2020-11-27|website=Centre for Industrial Relations and Human Resources|language=en}}

Laskin's career on the bench began in 1965 with his appointment to the Ontario Court of Appeal. While on the Court of Appeal, Laskin gave a decision in a divorce case, upholding the constitutional authority of the federal Parliament to include the right to spousal support under the Divorce Act.Papp v. Papp, [1970] 1 O.R. 331 (C.A.).Divorce Act, S.C. 1968-69, c. 24. Laskin held that spousal support was ancillary to Parliament's constitutional jurisdiction over divorce under the Constitution Act.[http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/Const/page-4.html#h-18 Constitution Act, 1867, s. 91(26), "Marriage and Divorce".] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140826115907/http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/Const/page-4.html#h-18 |date=August 26, 2014 }} When the Supreme Court of Canada considered the same issue three years later, it unanimously reached the same conclusion, citing Laskin's decision from the Ontario Court of Appeal.{{cite web|url=http://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/5152/index.do|title=Zacks v. Zacks - SCC Cases (Lexum)|website=scc-csc.lexum.com|date=January 2001 }}

On March 19, 1970, he was appointed on the advice of Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau to the Supreme Court of Canada, becoming the first Jewish justice to sit on that court. Again on the advice of Trudeau, Laskin was appointed Chief Justice on December 27, 1973.{{Cite book|title=The Supreme Court of Canada and Its Justices, 1875–2000|year=2000|publisher=Dundurn Press; Public Works and Government Services Canada|isbn=978-1-55488-356-1|oclc=244771089|page=66}} He held that position until his death in 1984.

Laskin's appointment as Chief Justice generated some controversy. He was the second-most junior justice on the court, having served for only three years. The long-standing tradition was that on the retirement of the chief justice, the senior puisne justice on the court would be appointed. Since the establishment of the Supreme Court in 1875, this practice had been followed except on two occasions, in 1906 and 1924, when the senior puisne justices had been passed over. By that tradition, the appointment as Chief Justice would have gone to Justice Ronald Martland, who had been on the court for fifteen years. When Prime Minister Trudeau appointed Laskin, it was said that Justice Martland had been given very little notice that he would be passed over, and was upset by it. Minister of Finance John Turner was rumoured to be furious at the departure from the traditions of the court.{{sfn|Snell|Vaughan|1985|pp=224–225}}

Laskin was a liberal jurist who often found himself on the minority side of decisions. His specialty was labour law and constitutional law and he had a reputation as a civil libertarian.{{Citation needed|date=October 2017}}

On matters of federalism under the Constitution Act, 1867, Laskin has been considered the most aggressive supporter of the federal powers of any justice since Confederation. This made for a stark contrast with fellow Justice Jean Beetz, who was known as one of the strongest supporters of provincial powers under the Constitution.{{citation needed|date=September 2019}}

In his earlier years on the Supreme Court, Laskin was frequently in dissent. During the 1970s, Laskin frequently joined with justices Wishart Spence and Brian Dickson on cases involving civil liberties, often in dissent from the more conservative majority on the court. The grouping was colloquially referred to as the "LSD connection."

Laskin often took a position that was later adopted by a majority of the court. Among his most famous dissents was his opinion in Murdoch v. Murdoch, where he was the sole judge who would have ruled in favour of a wife's application for an equal division of property acquired during the course of the marriage.[http://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/5346/index.do Murdoch v. Murdoch], [1975] 1 S.C.R. 423. The outcome of the case was highly controversial. It triggered reforms to matrimonial laws across the country, adopting Laskin's view of property equality between husband and wife. Years later, Laskin said that the position he took in this case was the likely cause of his promotion to Chief Justice over the more senior Ronald Martland.{{Citation needed|date=August 2014}}

Laskin presided over a number of landmark constitutional cases, most notably the 1981 Patriation Reference, which considered Pierre Trudeau's attempt to have the federal government unilaterally patriate the Constitution of Canada without the consent of the provinces. The case was a consolidated appeal of three provincial references, from Quebec, Manitoba and Newfoundland. By a 7-2 division, a majority of the court held that Parliament had the legal authority to act unilaterally. However, by a division of 6–3, the court also held that unilateral federal action would violate a constitutional convention that had emerged since Confederation, requiring substantial provincial agreement on constitutional amendments. Laskin was one of the judges in the majority on the issue of Parliament's legal authority to act unilaterally, but was one of the three dissenting judges who would have held that there was no constitutional convention restricting Parliament's power to act unilaterally.[http://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/2519/index.do Re: Resolution to amend the Constitution (Patriation Reference)], [1981] 1 S.C.R. 753.

As a result of the decision in the Patriation Reference, Trudeau decided to begin a new round of negotiations with the provinces, which resulted in the patriation of the Constitution from Britain being agreed to by all provinces save Quebec. Historian Frederic Bastien suggests that Laskin may have violated the constitutional separation of powers by discussing the deliberations of the court with politicians, casting doubt on the legitimacy of the decision.{{cite news| newspaper=La Presse| url=http://www.lapresse.ca/actualites/quebec-canada/politique-canadienne/201304/10/01-4639494-rapatriement-de-1982-quebec-etudie-ses-recours.php|title=Rapatriement de 1982: Québec étudie ses recours|access-date=2013-04-10}} However, surviving participants in the Reference process do not think that the allegations, even if true, undercut the validity of the court's decision. Other scholars said that the patriation process violated judicial independence.Cristin Schmitz, "[http://www.lawyersweekly.ca/index.php?section=article&articleid=1886 Patriation allegations: ‘A tempest in a teapot’] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150214095824/http://www.lawyersweekly.ca/index.php?section=article&articleid=1886 |date=February 14, 2015 }} " The Lawyers Weekly, April 26, 2013.

Laskin was in poor health the last few years of his life, and died in office on March 26, 1984, at the age of 71 from pneumonia. Two weeks before his death, on March 13, 1984, he was made a Companion of the Order of Canada.{{cite web|url=http://archive.gg.ca/honours/search-recherche/honours-desc.asp?lang=e&TypeID=orc&id=2104|title=Order of Canada|first=Government of Canada, Office of the Secretary to the Governor General, Information and Media|last=Services|website=archive.gg.ca}}

Prime Minister Trudeau offered a state funeral, but the family declined because Laskin "liked things very simple." Instead, Laskin lay in state in the Great Hall of the Supreme Court building, prior to a simple funeral ceremony in Ottawa and interment at Holy Blossom Memorial Park in Toronto.{{cite news|title=Bora Laskin buried|url=https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=86BVAAAAIBAJ&sjid=X0ANAAAAIBAJ&pg=1254,3067048&dq=bora+laskin+state+funeral&hl=en|access-date=August 24, 2011|newspaper=The Leader-Post|date=March 29, 1984}} His brother Saul Laskin was later buried beside him.{{citation needed|date=September 2019}}

File:Day6boralaskins.JPG

• Lakehead University, in Laskin's hometown of Thunder Bay, honoured him in several ways.
• The Bora Laskin Building, used primarily by the Faculty of Education.{{cite web |title=Bora Laskin Building |url=https://www.lakeheadu.ca/faculty-and-staff/departments/services/conference/tb/meeting-facilities/bora-laskin-building |website=Conference Services |publisher=Lakehead University |access-date=August 2, 2018 |language=en}}
• The Bora Laskin Faculty of Law, established 2013.
• The Laskin Moot was named in his honour.
• The main library of the University of Toronto Faculty of Law is named for Laskin.
• The Bora Laskin Law Society in Ottawa was named in his honour in 2011.{{cite web|title=Bora Laskin Law Society, Ottawa.|url=http://boralaskinlawsociety.ca/|access-date=2020-12-05|website=Bora Laskin Law Society}}
• Elected as a Fellow of the Royal Society of Canada in 1964, giving him the right to the post nominal letters "FRSC".{{cite web|url=https://rsc-src.ca/en/search-fellows?keywords_44=&first_name=Bora&last_name=Laskin&display_name=&election_year_21=&academy_25=All&division_24=All&discipline_23=All&is_deceased=1&sort_by=last_name&sort_order=ASC|title=Search Fellows - The Royal Society of Canada|website=rsc-src.ca}}

Bora Laskin received honorary degrees from many Canadian and international universities, these include:

{{Incomplete list|date=May 2015}}

• List of Supreme Court of Canada cases (Laskin Court)

{{reflist}}

{{refbegin}}

• {{Cite book|last=Girard|first=Philip|url=https://archive.org/details/boralaskinbringi0000gira|url-access=registration|title=Bora Laskin: Bringing Law to Life|year=2005|publisher=Osgoode Society for Canadian Legal History; University of Toronto Press|isbn=978-1-4426-7152-2|oclc=314201685}}
• {{Cite book|last1=Snell|first1=James G.|last2=Vaughan|first2=Frederick|url=https://archive.org/details/supremecourtofca0000snel|url-access=registration|title=The Supreme Court of Canada: History of the Institution|date=1985|publisher=University of Toronto Press; Osgoode Society for Canadian Legal History|isbn=0-8020-3417-9|oclc=15520650}}
• {{cite book |last1=Swinton |first1=Katherine E. |title=The Supreme Court and Canadian federalism: the Laskin-Dickson years |date=1990 |publisher=Carswell |location=Toronto |isbn=0-459-34761-6}}

{{refend}}

• [https://www.scc-csc.ca/judges-juges/bio-eng.aspx?id=bora-laskin Supreme Court of Canada Biography: Bora Laskin]
• [http://archive.gg.ca/honours/search-recherche/honours-desc.asp?lang=e&TypeID=orc&id=2104 Order of Canada Citation: Bora Laskin]
• [https://discoverarchives.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/laskin-bora-oral-history Bora Laskin oral history interview] held at the [https://utarms.library.utoronto.ca/ University of Toronto Archives and Records Management Services]

{{clear|left}}

{{CanadaCJs}}

{{Fauteaux-court}}

{{Laskin-court}}

{{Authority control}}

{{DEFAULTSORT:Laskin, Bora}}

Category:1912 births

Category:1984 deaths

Category:20th-century Canadian lawyers

Category:Canadian Jews

Category:Canadian scholars of constitutional law

Category:Chief justices of Canada

Category:Companions of the Order of Canada

Category:Corresponding fellows of the British Academy

Category:Fellows of the Royal Society of Canada

Category:Harvard Law School alumni

Category:Justices of the Court of Appeal for Ontario

Category:Lawyers in Ontario

Category:Members of the King's Privy Council for Canada

Category:People from Thunder Bay

Category:University of Toronto alumni

Category:University of Toronto Faculty of Law alumni

Category:Academic staff of the University of Toronto Faculty of Law