Censorship of Facebook

Online censorship by Facebook of algorithmic methods raises concerns including the surveillance of all instant communications and the use of machine learning systems with the potential for errors and biases.{{Cite journal|last=Cobbe|first=Jennifer|date=2019-08-14|title=Algorithmic Censorship on Social Platforms: Power, Legitimacy, and Resistance|journal=Philosophy & Technology |language=en|location=Rochester, NY|ssrn=3437304}} Mark Zuckerberg, Facebook's CEO and majority shareholder, published a memo on censorship. "What should be the limits to what people can express?" he asked. "What content should be distributed and what should be blocked? Who should decide these policies and make enforcement decisions?"{{Cite web|url=https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2018/12/facebook-punish-censorship/577654/|title=The Speech That Facebook Plans to Punish|last=Friedersdorf|first=Conor|date=2018-12-11|website=The Atlantic|language=en-US|access-date=2019-12-16|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191115132324/https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2018/12/facebook-punish-censorship/577654/|archive-date=2019-11-15|url-status=live}}

[[File:Facebook censorship.svg|thumb|Map showing the countries that are either currently blocking or have blocked Facebook in the past

{{legend|#225ea8|Currently blocked}}{{legend|#41b6c4|Formerly blocked}}]]

{{main|Telecommunications in Austria#Internet censorship and surveillance}}

Like France and Germany, Austria has laws prohibiting Holocaust denial. This caused 78 Facebook posts to be banned from the country in 2013.{{Cite magazine|url=https://web-a-ebscohost-com.ezp.mesacc.edu/ehost/detail/detail?vid=43&sid=478b8a6a-822d-4e40-919b-f968207ac5cb%40sdc-v-sessmgr06&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#AN=95955653&db=aph|title=Facebook Reveals Which Countries Censor Your Newsfeed|last=Stamper|first=Laura|date=2014-04-15|magazine=Time|access-date=2019-05-10}}

{{main|Internet in Bangladesh#Internet censorship and surveillance}}

{{see also|Blasphemy law in Bangladesh}}

Bangladesh (like Iran, China and North Korea) had banned Facebook before.{{Cite news |date=November 18, 2015 |title=Bangladesh death sentences lead to Facebook ban |work=BBC |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-34860667 |access-date=May 27, 2022}} The ban operated for about a month, precisely from November to December 2015.{{Cite news |date=December 10, 2015 |title=Bangladesh lifts ban on Facebook |work=The Guardian |url=https://guardian.ng/news/bangladesh-lifts-ban-on-facebook/ |access-date=May 27, 2022}} The Awami League-led government of Bangladesh announced a countrywide ban on Facebook and other social-network websites. Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina (in office from 2009) proposed the establishment of an Internet monitoring committee with the help of Bangladesh's intelligence services. Right-wing political parties and groups in Bangladesh protested against bloggers and others they had considered "blasphemous" at the time of the proposal. Extremists in the country had murdered eight secularists, including atheist blogger Ahmed Rajib Haider, who was fatally stabbed in February 2013. National riots over the country's war-crimes trials resulted in the deaths of 56 people between 19 January 2013 and 2 March 2013.

On 18 November 2015, the same Awami League government banned Facebook again on the eve of the final judgement of Bangladesh Jamaat-e-Islami leader Ali Ahsan Muhammad Mujahid and Bangladesh Nationalist Party leader Salauddin Kader Chowdhury. Both the politicians and previous minister have been issued a death sentence by the War Criminals Tribunal and the review board of the Supreme Court of Bangladesh has finally given their judgement in favour of the previously given one.

The Bangladesh government lifted the ban on 20 December 2015.

{{main|Internet censorship in China}}

{{see also|Great Firewall}}

In China, Facebook was blocked following the July 2009 Ürümqi riots because protestors with the East Turkestan independence movement were using Facebook as part of their communications network to organize attacks across the city; Facebook refused to release the protestor identities and information to the Chinese government.{{cite web|title= 80 pct of netizens agree China should punish Facebook|url= http://english.people.com.cn/90001/90776/90882/6697993.html|date= July 10, 2009|publisher= The People's Daily Online|access-date= July 13, 2009|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20090714121501/http://english.people.com.cn/90001/90776/90882/6697993.html|archive-date= July 14, 2009|url-status= live}} Some Chinese users also believed that Facebook would not succeed in China after Google China's problems in 2013.{{cite web|title= Facebook上演戏剧 纸老虎"非死不可"|url= http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_000ed7d80100i79k.html|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20131214040727/http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_000ed7d80100i79k.html|archive-date= December 14, 2013|url-status= dead|access-date= December 10, 2013|language= zh}} Renren (formerly Xiaonei) has many features similar to Facebook, and complies with PRC Government regulations regarding content filtering.

As of 20 August 2013, there have been reports of Facebook being partially unblocked in China.{{cite news |url=http://www.headlineasia.com/facebook-and-twitter-in-china/ |title=Facebook And Twitter In China! |date=2013-08-20 |access-date=2013-12-10 |website=Headline Asia |publisher=South China Morning Post |publication-date=2013-08-19 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131212145054/http://www.headlineasia.com/facebook-and-twitter-in-china/ |archive-date=2013-12-12 }} However, according to the "Blocked in China" website, Facebook is still blocked as of 7 December 2019.{{cite web |url=http://www.blockedinchina.net/?siteurl=facebook.com |title=Test If Any Website Is Blocked In China |website=BlockedInChina.net |access-date=August 2, 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170129121311/http://www.blockedinchina.net/?siteurl=facebook.com |archive-date=January 29, 2017 |url-status=live }} Facebook is not blocked in Hong Kong and Macau, which are special administrative regions operating under different systems. Facebook is currently working on a censorship project for China, where a third party would be allowed to regulate Facebook and control popular stories that come around. This would be a huge attempt by Facebook to get back into China.{{Cite web|url=https://login.ezp.mesacc.edu/login?qurl=http://link.galegroup.com%2fapps%2fdoc%2fA474768520%2fITBC%3fu%3dmcc_mesa%26sid%3dITBC%26xid%3d9a60479f|title=Off-Campus eResource Access - Paul A. Elsner Library @ Mesa Community College|website=login.ezp.mesacc.edu|access-date=2018-12-11}}

On 6 July 2020, Facebook announced that the company would stop reviewing requests for Hong Kong users' data while evaluating the newly imposed Hong Kong national security law by the Chinese government.{{cite news |last1= Lerman |first1= Rachel| title= Facebook, Google, Twitter halt review of Hong Kong requests for data |newspaper= The Washington Post|url= https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2020/07/06/facebook-hong-kong-law/ |access-date=14 August 2020 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20200815040918/https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2020/07/06/facebook-hong-kong-law/| archive-date=15 August 2020}}

{{main|Internet in Egypt#Censorship}}

Facebook was blocked for a few days in Egypt during the 2011 Egyptian revolution.{{cite news

| url= https://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5jK3UhbzReiwvzyJImym-FEeZb87A?docId=CNG.737c6f9342ecee94153df06ff00b5617.a1

| archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20110130193232/http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5jK3UhbzReiwvzyJImym-FEeZb87A?docId=CNG.737c6f9342ecee94153df06ff00b5617.a1

| url-status= dead

| archive-date= January 30, 2011

| title= Facebook reported inaccessible in Egypt

| publisher=Google/Agence France-Presse

| date= 26 Jan 2011

}}

{{main|Internet censorship in France}}

Like Austria and Germany, France has laws prohibiting Holocaust denial. Because of this, 80 Facebook posts were blocked in 2013.

{{main|Internet censorship in Germany}}

In July 2011, authorities in Germany began to discuss the prohibition of events organized on Facebook. This was motivated by numerous cases of overcrowding by people who were not originally invited.{{cite web|url=http://www.ptjornal.com/201107041737/mundo/alemanha-festas-convocadas-pelo-facebook-sao-ameaca-a-ordem-publica.html |title=Alemanha: Festas convocadas pelo Facebook são "ameaça à ordem pública"|publisher=Ptjornal.com|access-date=October 29, 2011|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110904145814/http://www.ptjornal.com/201107041737/mundo/alemanha-festas-convocadas-pelo-facebook-sao-ameaca-a-ordem-publica.html|archive-date=September 4, 2011}}
{{cite web|url=http://www.destakjornal.com.br/readContent.aspx?id=10,101638|title=Alemanha pode proibir festas combinadas pelo Facebook|publisher=Destakjornal.com.br|access-date=October 29, 2011|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110824210926/http://www.destakjornal.com.br/readContent.aspx?id=10%2C101638|archive-date=August 24, 2011}} In one instance, 1,600 "guests" attended the 16th birthday party for a girl in Hamburg who accidentally posted the invitation for the event as public. After reports of overcrowding, more than a hundred police were deployed for crowd control. A police officer was injured and eleven participants were arrested for assault, property damage, and resistance to authorities.{{cite web|url=http://librguides.com/facebook-blunder.html|title=Facebook blunder invites 15,000 to teen's 16th birthday party; 100 cops show up, too|publisher=LIBR Guides|date=July 18, 2015|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150721185858/http://librguides.com/facebook-blunder.html|archive-date=July 21, 2015}} In another unexpectedly overcrowded event, 41 young people were arrested and at least 16 injured.{{cite web|url=http://www.dw.com/en/facebook-users-crash-public-birthday-party-in-hamburg/a-15131464|title=Facebook users crash 'public' birthday party in Hamburg|publisher=dw.com|language=en|access-date=March 18, 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170319110911/http://www.dw.com/en/facebook-users-crash-public-birthday-party-in-hamburg/a-15131464|archive-date=March 19, 2017|url-status=live}}

In 2016, Facebook revealed Germany had blocked 84 posts from its citizens. These posts contained themes of Holocaust denial, which is illegal there.

In 2015, during the European migrant crisis with large numbers of immigrants entering the country illegally, a broad discussion about the problems of mass immigration and government politics took place in social media. Early in 2016, a Bertelsmann company called "Arvato" was mandated to erase comments and contents from Facebook.{{cite web|title=Bertelsmann zensiert Facebook-Postings im Namen der Bundesregierung|url=http://www.neopresse.com/politik/dach/bertelsmann-facebook-hass-postings-fluechtlinge-bundesrergierung-zensur-loeschen/|website=NEOPresse – Unabhängige Nachrichten|access-date=2016-01-21|language=de-DE|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160120222329/http://www.neopresse.com/politik/dach/bertelsmann-facebook-hass-postings-fluechtlinge-bundesrergierung-zensur-loeschen|archive-date=2016-01-20|url-status=live|date=2016-01-18}} In the summer of 2016, police in fourteen German states began coordinated raids on the residences of individuals who praised the Nazi regime or referred to refugees as "scum" in a private Facebook group.{{cite web|url=https://www.thelocal.de/20160713/german-police-launch-first-nationwide-hate-speech-raids|title=German police launch first nationwide hate speech raids|access-date=12 February 2018|date=13 July 2016|website=The Local|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180213135117/https://www.thelocal.de/20160713/german-police-launch-first-nationwide-hate-speech-raids|archive-date=13 February 2018|url-status=live}} A law known as NetzDG went into effect starting in 2018 which mandates all websites in Germany, including Facebook, censor such illegal content.{{cite web|url=http://www.dw.com/en/germany-implements-new-internet-hate-speech-crackdown/a-41991590|title=Germany implements new internet hate speech crackdown|date=1 January 2018|access-date=12 February 2018|publisher=Deutsche Welle|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180210162046/http://www.dw.com/en/germany-implements-new-internet-hate-speech-crackdown/a-41991590|archive-date=10 February 2018|url-status=live}} A spokesperson for Facebook announced the company's opposition to the law on the grounds that it would lead to overblocking.{{cite web|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-trending-41042266|title=Will Germany's new law kill free speech online?|first=Patrick|last=Evans|publisher=BBC|date=2017-09-18|access-date=2018-06-05|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180616210808/https://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-trending-41042266|archive-date=2018-06-16|url-status=live}}

{{main|Internet in Greece#Internet censorship and surveillance}}

In February 2021 Facebook deleted posts and events,{{Cite web|date=2021-02-25|title=Το Facebook λογόκρινε εκδήλωση για... τη λογοκρισία στα κοινωνικά δίκτυα|url=https://info-war.gr/to-facebook-logokrine-ekdilosi-gia-ti-logokr/|access-date=2021-02-25|website=INFO-WAR|language=el}} imposed 30-day bans on prominent journalists and members of the general public,{{Cite web|title=O Κουφοντίνας σε Απεργία Δίψας, το Facebook σε Λογοκρισία|url=https://www.vice.com/el/article/7k9ady/o-koyfontinas-se-apergia-dipsas-to-facebook-se-logokrisia|access-date=2021-02-25|website=www.vice.com|language=el}} for posting in solidarity with the 63-year-old convict Dimitris Koufodinas who is on hunger strike since the 8th of January 2021. Koufodinas is serving a life sentence, after having been convicted as a member of the far-left Revolutionary Organization 17 November (17N), committing 11 murders in that time. He has been demanding to be returned to Korydallos prison for months with a long hunger strike against new repressive laws.{{Cite web|date=2021-01-19|title=Solidarity with the hunger striker Dimitris Koufodinas!|url=https://synantisi.org/freedom-of-expression-and-freedom-of-assembly-under-attack-in-greece-as-government-leads-hunger-striker-to-death/|access-date=2021-04-15|website=Συνάντηση|language=el}}

{{main|Internet censorship in India}}

The first time Facebook shared how often it allows governments to censor their citizens' content, they stated that India had censored 4,765 posts in their country in the last six months of 2013. Facebook removed these posts in India under the government's claim of unlawful content.

India imposed a three-day ban on Facebook and other social media sites during the riots in Punjab, Haryana and Chandigarh after the conviction of Baba Ram Rahim Singh in 2017.{{cn|date= January 2025}} Censorship on Facebook increased by 19% in 6 months in 2014; India led the list of content removal in 2014.{{cn|date= January 2025}}

{{main|Internet censorship in Indonesia}}

Indonesian citizens are familiar with censorship of Facebook content. In 2019, the government (through the ministry of information Rusdiantara) threatened to ban the social network.{{Cite web|title=Why a Facebook ban is unlikely in Indonesia|url=https://www.techinasia.com/facebook-ban-unlikely-indonesia|website=Tech in Asia}} Soon after the agreement made, the first public known about censorship is on the demonstration that campaigned as riots by government, maybe this is the first-ever plot twist used on demonstration using social media.{{Cite web|title=Indonesia Blocks Facebook and Whatsapp features after "Fake News-Inspired" Riots and Deaths|url=https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/news/indonesia-facebook-whatsapp-ban-blocked-election-riots-a8926706.html|website=Independent|date=23 May 2019}}{{Cite web|title=Indonesia restricts WhatsApp, Facebook and Instagram usage following deadly riots|url=https://techcrunch.com/2019/05/22/indonesia-restricts-whatsapp-and-instagram/|website=Tech Crunch|date=22 May 2019 }}

In 2020, Facebook censored posts about "FPI". The escalation is in December 2020 when there are six FPI-affiliated civilians killed on purported attach by Police. As soon Police made a press release about resistance it doubted by the public as self-defence procedure.{{Cite web|title=Six alleged Rizieq sympathizers shot dead following purported attack on Jakarta Police|url=https://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2020/12/07/six-alleged-rizieq-sympathizers-shot-dead-following-attack-on-jakarta-police.html|website=The Jakarta Post}} Independent analyst showed the public doubt on Police fact statement in social media post interactions.{{Cite web|last=Fahmi|first=Ismail|title=Insiden Penembakan 6 Anggota FPI Oleh Polisi di Jalan Tol|url=https://www2.slideshare.net/IsmailFahmi3/insiden-penembakan-6-anggota-fpi-oleh-polisi-di-jalan-tol|website=Drone Emprit|language=id|date=8 December 2020}} NGO's urged government to form independent investigations to observe the issue of human-right offenses and extra judicial killing.{{Cite web|title=Use of force in deadly FPI shooting must be independently investigated|url=https://www.amnesty.id/use-of-force-in-deadly-fpi-shooting-must-be-independently-investigated/|website=Amnesty International|date=7 December 2020}}{{Cite web|title=Kontras Warns FPI-Police Clash May Cause Bigger Problem|url=https://en.tempo.co/read/1412955/kontras-warns-fpi-police-clash-may-cause-bigger-problem|website=Kompas|date=9 December 2020 }}

{{main|Internet censorship in Iran}}

After the 2009 Iranian presidential election, Facebook was banned because of fears that opposition movements were being organized on the website. However, after four years of the blocking of Facebook website, as of September 2013, the blocking of both Twitter and Facebook was thought to have been lifted without notice.{{Cite news|url=http://mashable.com/2013/09/16/twitter-facebook-iran/|title=Iran Unblocks Twitter and Facebook|date=August 17, 2013|access-date=August 17, 2013|agency=Mashable|work=Chris Taylor|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170829214714/http://mashable.com/2013/09/16/twitter-facebook-iran/|archive-date=August 29, 2017|url-status=live}}

Iranians lost unrestricted access to Facebook and Twitter the next day, leaving many people wondering whether the opening was deliberate or the result of some technical glitch.{{cite news | url=https://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/18/world/middleeast/facebook-and-twitter-blocked-again-in-iran-after-respite.html | work=The New York Times | first=Thomas | last=Erdbrink | title=Iran Bars Social Media Again After a Day | date=September 17, 2013 | access-date=February 21, 2017 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170301180901/http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/18/world/middleeast/facebook-and-twitter-blocked-again-in-iran-after-respite.html | archive-date=March 1, 2017 | url-status=live }}

{{main|Censorship in Israel}}

In September 2016, the Cabinet of Israel has said to have agreed with Facebook to remove content that is deemed as incitement to violence.{{cite news|url=https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/sep/12/facebook-israel-monitor-posts-incite-violence-social-media?CMP=twt_gu|title=Facebook and Israel to work to monitor posts that incite violence|date=2016-12-09|newspaper=The Guardian|access-date=2018-01-03|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180104073223/https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/sep/12/facebook-israel-monitor-posts-incite-violence-social-media?CMP=twt_gu|archive-date=2018-01-04|url-status=live}} This announcement came after top Facebook officials met with the Israeli government to determine which Facebook accounts should be deleted on the grounds that they constituted incitement to violence.{{Cite magazine|url=https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/who-will-fix-facebook-759916/|title=Who Will Fix Facebook?|last1=Taibbi|first1=Matt|date=2018-11-26|magazine=Rolling Stone|access-date=2019-05-10|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190510070635/https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/who-will-fix-facebook-759916/|archive-date=2019-05-10|url-status=live}}

Critics of Israel's policies are not happy with this move as they claim it is being used as a way to silence outspoken Palestinian activists and journalists. The activists argue that when they post material meant to critique the occupation, Israel sees it as encouraging violence.{{cite news|url=https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/palestinian-activists-facebook_us_57ed66bce4b082aad9ba1122|title=Palestinian Activists Are Angry About Alleged Facebook Censorship|date=2016-09-29|work=Huffington Post|access-date=2018-01-03|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180115141659/https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/palestinian-activists-facebook_us_57ed66bce4b082aad9ba1122|archive-date=2018-01-15|url-status=live}} Some believe that the Israeli government and Facebook have an "informal arrangement" for monitoring Facebook content. Jordana Cutler, who previously was the Chief of Staff at the Israel Embassy in Washington DC and a former adviser to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is Facebook's head of policy in Israel. She claimed that Facebook is merely following suggestions. "We receive requests from the government but are not committed to them," Cutler said.

In 2015, Nauru permanently blocked sites set up for "abusive content" such as child pornography and would temporarily block some sites like Facebook.{{Cite web|url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/may/04/facebook-blocked-on-nauru-due-to-paranoia-about-media-scrutiny-says-former-president|title = Facebook blocked on Nauru due to 'paranoia' about media scrutiny, says former president|website = TheGuardian.com|date = 4 May 2015}}{{Cite news|url=https://www.news.com.au/technology/online/social/president-of-nauru-blocks-countrys-access-to-facebook/news-story/df309725ac21635e2e2156d0059238d1|title = President of Nauru blocks country's access to Facebook|newspaper = News.com.au |date = 13 May 2015}} Despite controversy surrounding the ban, President Baron Waqa defended it.{{Cite news|url=https://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-05-29/nauru-president-baron-waqa-defends-facebook-ban/6507240|title = Nauru's president Baron Waqa defends Facebook ban|newspaper = ABC News AU|date = 29 May 2015}} In 2018, the ban on Facebook in Nauru was lifted.{{Cite web|url=https://www.rnz.co.nz/international/pacific-news/349319/nauru-lifts-facebook-ban|title = Nauru lifts Facebook ban|website = Radio New Zealand|date = 31 January 2018}}

{{main|Censorship in North Korea#Internet policies|Internet in North Korea}}

In April 2016, North Korea started blocking Facebook, "a move underscoring its concern with the spread of online information," according to the Associated Press. Anyone who tries to access it without special permission from the North Korean government will be subject to punishment.{{Cite web| title = North Korea blocks Facebook, Twitter and YouTube| work = The Associated Press| date = 4 April 2016| access-date = 4 April 2016| url = http://globalnews.ca/news/2616449/north-korea-blacks-facebook-twitter-and-youtube/| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20160406095746/http://globalnews.ca/news/2616449/north-korea-blacks-facebook-twitter-and-youtube/| archive-date = 6 April 2016| url-status = live}}

The Information and Communication Technologies Authority (ICTA) of Mauritius, ordered internet service providers of the country to ban Facebook effective immediately, on 8 November 2007 because of a fake profile page of the Prime Minister. Access to Facebook was restored the next day.{{cite web |url=http://www.noulakaz.net/weblog/2007/11/08/facebook-a-mauritian-tragedy/ |title=Facebook: A Mauritian tragedy? |publisher=Noulakaz |date=2007-11-08 |access-date=2011-10-29 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110723230916/http://www.noulakaz.net/weblog/2007/11/08/facebook-a-mauritian-tragedy/ |archive-date=2011-07-23 |url-status=live }}{{cite web|url=http://www.lexpress.mu/services/archive-97239-maurice-censure-le-site-communautaire-facebook.html|title=Maurice censure le site communautaire Facebook|publisher=L'express|access-date=9 Nov 2007|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://archive.today/20120913202342/http://www.lexpress.mu/services/archive-97239-maurice-censure-le-site-communautaire-facebook.html|archive-date=2012-09-13}}

{{main|Internet censorship in Morocco}}

On 5 February 2008, Fouad Mourtada, a citizen of Morocco, was arrested for 43 days due to the alleged creation of a faked Facebook profile of Prince Moulay Rachid of Morocco.{{cite news|url=http://www.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/africa/02/07/morocco.facebook/index.html?eref=rss_latest|title=Police arrest man for 'villainous' theft of prince's ID on Facebook|publisher=CNN|access-date=March 5, 2008|date=February 7, 2008|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080215102125/http://www.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/africa/02/07/morocco.facebook/index.html?eref=rss_latest|archive-date=February 15, 2008|url-status=live}}{{cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/07/world/africa/07briefs-identity.html?ex=1360040400&en=28cce9bbc525d4cd&ei=5088&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss|title=Moroccan held for alleged royal ID theft|newspaper=The New York Times|access-date=March 5, 2008|date=February 7, 2008|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080215102635/http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/07/world/africa/07briefs-identity.html?ex=1360040400&en=28cce9bbc525d4cd&ei=5088&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss|archive-date=February 15, 2008|url-status=live}}

{{main|Internet in Myanmar#Censorship}}

On 4 February 2021, access to Facebook, WhatsApp, and Instagram were restricted on multiple internet providers in Myanmar following the 2021 Myanmar coup d'état.{{cite web|title=Facebook says services in coup-hit Myanmar 'disrupted'|url=https://www.deccanherald.com/international/facebook-says-services-in-coup-hit-myanmar-disrupted-947275.html|access-date=5 February 2021|publisher=Deccan Herald|date=4 February 2021|author=AFP}} Facebook's usual attempts of not following and challenging the local laws and government led to the current censorship block. The censorship might remain forever and be replaced by similar social media which will abide by the local laws.

{{main|Internet censorship in Pakistan}}

On 19 May 2010, the Lahore High Court ordered Facebook to be blocked. Facebook was blocked until 31 May 2010 after a competition page encouraged users to post drawings of Muhammad. The controversial page named "Draw Mohammad Day" had been created by a Facebook user in response to American cartoonist Molly Noris's protest to the decision of US television channel, Comedy Central to cancel an episode of the popular show South Park over its depiction of Muhammad.{{Cite news|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/pakistan/7740295/Facebook-blocked-in-Pakistan-over-Prophet-Mohammed-cartoon-row.html|title=Facebook blocked in Pakistan over Prophet Mohammed cartoon row|last=Crilly|first=Rob|journal=Daily Telegraph|date=19 May 2010|access-date=31 May 2019|issn=0307-1235|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100520031525/http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/pakistan/7740295/Facebook-blocked-in-Pakistan-over-Prophet-Mohammed-cartoon-row.html|archive-date=20 May 2010|url-status=live}} Noris had however disavowed having declared 20 May "Draw Muhammad Day" and had condemned the effort and issued an apology. The ban, implemented by the Pakistan Telecommunication Authority, also resulted in a ban on YouTube and restricted access to other websites, including Wikipedia.{{Cite news|url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2010/may/31/pakistan-lifts-facebook-ban|title=Pakistan lifts Facebook ban but 'blasphemous' pages stay hidden|last=Walsh|first=Declan|date=31 May 2010|work=The Guardian|access-date=31 May 2019|issn=0261-3077|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190531090225/https://www.theguardian.com/world/2010/may/31/pakistan-lifts-facebook-ban|archive-date=31 May 2019|url-status=live}}

On 25 November 2017, the NetBlocks internet shutdown observatory and Digital Rights Foundation collected evidence of nationwide blocking of Facebook alongside other social media services, imposed by the government in response to the violent Tehreek-e-Labaik protests.{{Cite news|url=https://digitalrightsfoundation.pk/press-release-drf-and-netblocks-find-blanket-and-nation-wide-ban-on-social-media-in-pakistan-and-demand-it-to-be-lifted-immediately/|title=DRF and NetBlocks find blanket and nation-wide ban on social media in Pakistan and demand it to be lifted immediately|date=2017-11-26|work=Digital Rights Foundation|access-date=2017-11-29|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171201040815/https://digitalrightsfoundation.pk/press-release-drf-and-netblocks-find-blanket-and-nation-wide-ban-on-social-media-in-pakistan-and-demand-it-to-be-lifted-immediately/|archive-date=2017-12-01|url-status=live}}{{Cite news|url=http://nation.com.pk/27-Nov-2017/activists-assail-blanket-ban-on-social-media|title=Activists assail blanket ban on social media|date=2017-11-27|work=The Nation|access-date=2017-11-29|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171128200108/http://nation.com.pk/27-Nov-2017/activists-assail-blanket-ban-on-social-media|archive-date=2017-11-28|url-status=live}} The technical investigation found that all major Pakistani fixed-line and mobile service providers were affected by the restrictions, which were lifted by the PTA the next day when protests abated following the resignation of Minister for Law and Justice Zahid Hamid.{{Cite news|url=http://nation.com.pk/26-Nov-2017/the-issue-of-social-media-networking|title=The issue of social media networking|date=2017-11-26|work=The Nation|access-date=2017-11-29|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171128200126/http://nation.com.pk/26-Nov-2017/the-issue-of-social-media-networking|archive-date=2017-11-28|url-status=live}} Other websites including Twitter, YouTube and Dailymotion were also reportedly blocked by order of the PTA.{{cite web|url=https://www.ifex.org/pakistan/2017/11/28/tv-news-suspended/|title=Pakistan suspends TV news channels and social media sites to block protest coverage|publisher=ifex|date=29 November 2017|access-date=29 November 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171129095415/https://ifex.org/pakistan/2017/11/28/tv-news-suspended/|archive-date=29 November 2017|url-status=live}}

Between May and June 2018, Facebook was banned for a month due to users posting misinformation and pornography.{{cite news | url=https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-44290012 | title=Facebook to be banned in Papua New Guinea for a month | work=BBC News | date=29 May 2018 }}

{{main|Internet censorship in Russia}}

In 2014, Russia demanded that all links on Facebook be blocked that supported Russian opposition Aleksei A. Navalny. Facebook users were blocked from any protest supporting Aleksei.{{Cite book|title=Facebook should Stop Cooperating with Russian Government Censorship.|last=Somin|first=llya|publisher=Washington: WP Company LLC d/b/a The Washington Post|year=2014}} This included about ten million Facebook users.{{Cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/02/business/international/web-freedom-is-seen-to-be-growing-as-a-global-issue-in-2015.html|title=Web Freedom Is Seen as a Growing Global Issue|last1=Goel|first1=Vindu|date=2015-01-01|work=The New York Times|access-date=2019-05-10|last2=Kramer|first2=Andrew E.|issn=0362-4331|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190510070628/https://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/02/business/international/web-freedom-is-seen-to-be-growing-as-a-global-issue-in-2015.html|archive-date=2019-05-10|url-status=live}}

The Russian invasion of Ukraine culminated in Russian-state media being banned from monetizing content on the Facebook platform. Russia therefore decided to impose access restriction on Facebook and Twitter.{{cite web|url=https://news.yahoo.com/russia-restricts-twitter-facebook-during-200817875.html|title=Russia restricts Twitter, Facebook during Ukraine attack}}{{cite web | title=Google's YouTube at Risk of Russia Ban After Facebook Deemed Illegal | website=Bloomberg | date=2022-03-22 | url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-03-22/youtube-at-risk-of-russia-ban-after-facebook-is-deemed-illegal | access-date=2022-09-23}}

On 27 February 2022, Russia began restricting access to Facebook during the invasion of Ukraine by limiting access to the platform's content delivery network.{{Cite web |date=2022-02-26 |title=Twitter and Facebook restricted in Russia amid conflict with Ukraine |url=https://netblocks.org/reports/twitter-and-facebook-restricted-in-russia-amid-conflict-with-ukraine-JBZrogB6 |access-date= |website=NetBlocks |language=en-US}}{{Cite web |last=AP |title=Internet monitor says Russia is blocking Facebook |url=https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveblog_entry/internet-monitor-says-russia-is-blocking-facebook/ |access-date= |website=Times of Israel |language=en-US}} On 4 March 2022, Internet rights monitor NetBlocks reported that the restriction of Facebook had become "near-total." Regulatory agency Roskomnadzor announced that the restrictions had been imposed to curtail information on Facebook and Twitter which did not align with the government of Russia's positions.{{cite web |date=March 4, 2022 |title=Facebook And Twitter Have Been Blocked In Russia |url=https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/sarahemerson/russia-blocks-facebook-twitter |website=BuzzFeed |accessdate=March 4, 2022}}

In November 2020, Solomon Islands' Cabinet planned to block access to Facebook in the country in response to a lack of national legislation on internet usage and cybercrime.{{cite news |title=Solomon Islands to ban Facebook |url=https://www.rnz.co.nz/international/pacific-news/430811/solomon-islands-to-ban-facebook |access-date=November 17, 2020 |work=RNZ |date=November 17, 2020 |language=en-nz}} The motion to block it was started by the prime minister Manasseh Sogavare and communication and civil aviation minister Peter Agovaka.{{cite news |title=Solomon Islands government preparing to ban Facebook |url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/nov/17/solomon-islands-government-preparing-to-ban-facebook |access-date=November 19, 2020 |work=The Guardian|date=November 17, 2020 |language=en}} In January 2021, the proposed ban did not go ahead.{{Cite news|url=https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-01-15/solomon-islands-backtracks-on-plan-to-ban-facebook/13060246|title = 'You're playing with people's lives': Solomon Islands backs down on plans to ban Facebook|newspaper = ABC News|date = 15 January 2021}}

{{main|Censorship in South Asia#Sri Lanka}}

In March 2018, Facebook was blocked for 3 days in Sri Lanka due to racial hate speeches being rumored around the country via the social media network, causing many riots in the country by extremist groups. However this decision was not permanent.{{cite web|url=http://www.dailymirror.lk/article/Tense-situ-in-Teldeniya-over-death-of-assault-victim-146768.html|title=Tense situ in Teldeniya over death of assault victim|access-date=2018-03-14|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180315003725/http://www.dailymirror.lk/article/Tense-situ-in-Teldeniya-over-death-of-assault-victim-146768.html|archive-date=2018-03-15|url-status=live}}{{cite news |url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/mar/14/facebook-accused-by-sri-lanka-of-failing-to-control-hate-speech |newspaper=The Guardian |title=Sri Lanka accuses Facebook over hate speech after deadly riots |first=Michael |last=Safi |date=March 14, 2018 |quote=As mobs of hardline Buddhists rioted and lit fires in towns in the central district of Kandy, Facebook, WhatsApp and several other platforms were blocked across the country [...] Both Facebook and WhatsApp remain restricted but the Guardian understands the block on the latter could be lifted by Wednesday evening.}}

On 21 April 2019, Facebook was blocked along with other social media sites until 30 April 2019 in Sri Lanka to prevent false information about Easter Sunday bombings spreading around the country via social media.{{cite web|url=https://www.engadget.com/2019/04/21/sri-lanka-bans-social-media-after-bombings|title=Sri Lanka temporarily bans social media after terrorist bombings|website=engadget.com|date=April 21, 2019|access-date=April 30, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190502222749/https://www.engadget.com/2019/04/21/sri-lanka-bans-social-media-after-bombings/|archive-date=May 2, 2019|url-status=live}}{{cite web|url=https://www.newsfirst.lk/2019/04/30/social-media-ban-lifted|title=Social media ban lifted|publisher=Newsfirst.lk|date=April 30, 2019|access-date=April 30, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190430053155/https://www.newsfirst.lk/2019/04/30/social-media-ban-lifted/|archive-date=April 30, 2019|url-status=live}}

On 5 May 2019, the Sri Lankan government reimposed a ban on social media platforms in an effort to stop the spread of rumours after violence erupted between groups of civilians in Negombo, north of the capital and site of one of the Easter Sunday bombings.{{cite web|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/sri-lanka-blasts-curfew/sri-lanka-imposes-curfew-in-negombo-after-clashes-bans-social-media-idUSL3N22H0EF|title=Sri Lanka imposes curfew in Negombo after clashes, bans social media|publisher=Reuters.com|date=May 5, 2019|access-date=May 5, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190505193610/https://www.reuters.com/article/sri-lanka-blasts-curfew/sri-lanka-imposes-curfew-in-negombo-after-clashes-bans-social-media-idUSL3N22H0EF|archive-date=May 5, 2019|url-status=live}} The ban was lifted on 6 May 2019.{{cite web|url=http://www.colombopage.com/archive_19A/May06_1557116757CH.php|title=Temporary ban on social media platforms lifted|publisher=Colombopage.com|date=May 6, 2019|access-date=May 13, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190513034310/http://www.colombopage.com/archive_19A/May06_1557116757CH.php|archive-date=May 13, 2019|url-status=live}}

On 13 May 2019, the Sri Lankan government temporarily banned social media including Facebook. This measure has been taken owing to the false propaganda carried out on social media and the unrest which had occurred in several areas.{{cite web|url=http://www.adaderana.lk/news/55087/social-media-temporarily-banned|title=Social media temporarily banned|publisher=AdaDerana.lk|date=May 13, 2019|access-date=May 13, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190513034950/http://www.adaderana.lk/news/55087/social-media-temporarily-banned|archive-date=May 13, 2019|url-status=live}} The ban was lifted on 17 May 2019.{{cite web|url=https://www.adaderana.lk/news/55200/social-media-ban-in-sri-lanka-lifted|title=Social media ban in Sri Lanka lifted|publisher=AdaDerana.lk|date=May 17, 2019|access-date=May 19, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190518205447/https://www.adaderana.lk/news/55200/social-media-ban-in-sri-lanka-lifted|archive-date=May 18, 2019|url-status=live}}

{{main|Telecommunications in Sudan#Internet censorship and surveillance}}

In December 2018, the Sudanese government blocked Facebook, along with other social media sites, which were being used by anti-government protesters to organize protests against President Omar al-Bashir.{{Cite news|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-sudan-protests-internet-idUSKCN1OW0Z7|title=Sudan restricts social media access to counter protest movement|date=2019-01-02|work=Reuters|access-date=2019-03-03|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190306111406/https://www.reuters.com/article/us-sudan-protests-internet-idUSKCN1OW0Z7|archive-date=2019-03-06|url-status=live}} The restrictions were lifted 68 days later following the introduction of emergency measures outlawing public demonstrations.{{Cite news|url=https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-sudan-protests-emergency-idUKKCN1QE26I|title=Sudan's Bashir bans protests in new emergency measures|date=2019-02-25|work=Reuters|access-date=2019-03-03|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190306043806/https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-sudan-protests-emergency-idUKKCN1QE26I|archive-date=2019-03-06|url-status=dead}}

{{main|Internet censorship in Syria}}

In November 2007, the Syrian government blocked access to Facebook in Syria. The government claimed that the website promoted attacks on authorities.{{cite news|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/worldNews/idUSOWE37285020071123|title=Syria blocks Facebook in Internet crackdown|access-date=March 5, 2008|author=Yacoub Oweis, Khaled|work=Reuters|date=November 23, 2007|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090201114242/http://www.reuters.com/article/worldNews/idUSOWE37285020071123|archive-date=February 1, 2009|url-status=live}}{{cite news| url=http://www.jpost.com/Middle-East/Syrian-govt-blocks-use-of-Facebook| title=Syrian gov't blocks use of Facebook| work=The Jerusalem Post| date=November 24, 2007| access-date=March 8, 2008| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170301180845/http://www.jpost.com/Middle-East/Syrian-govt-blocks-use-of-Facebook| archive-date=March 1, 2017| url-status=live}} The government also feared Israeli infiltration of Syrian social networks on Facebook. Facebook was also used by Syrian citizens to criticize the government of Syria, as public criticism of the Syrian government used to be punishable by imprisonment. In February 2011, Facebook was unblocked from all ISPs and the website remains accessible. {{cn|date= January 2025}}

In November 2012, Tajikistan temporarily blocked access to Facebook in response to comments posted online, spreading "mud and slander" about President Emomalii Rahmon and various other officials.{{Citation

| url = https://www.reuters.com/article/net-us-tajikistan-facebook-idUSBRE8AQ0JY20121127

| title = Could it happen again? Remembering Pakistan's Facebook, YouTube ban

| publisher =Dawn

| location = International

| date = March 27, 2017

| access-date = June 30, 2017

| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20150924172245/http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/11/27/net-us-tajikistan-facebook-idUSBRE8AQ0JY20121127

| archive-date = September 24, 2015

| url-status = live

}}

{{main|Internet censorship in Thailand}}

In 2017, Thailand asked Facebook to remove 309 posted items that were said to be illegal by standards of Thailand. However, Facebook only deleted 178 of the items, leaving 131 still on Facebook. Thai authorities stated if they found any illegal content in the remaining 131 posts they would ban all 14.8 million users from Facebook, instead of taking legal action. All posts ended up being removed from Facebook, preventing the shutdown of Facebook in Thailand.{{Cite web|url=https://login.ezp.mesacc.edu/login?qurl=http://link.galegroup.com%2fapps%2fdoc%2fA493945757%2fITOF%3fu%3dmcc_mesa%26sid%3dITOF%26xid%3d341adb3a|title=Off-Campus eResource Access - Paul A. Elsner Library @ Mesa Community College|website=login.ezp.mesacc.edu|access-date=December 11, 2018}}

On 24 August 2020, after being pressured by Thai government, Facebook blocked access in Thailand to "Royalist Marketplace", a private Monarchy discussion group created by Pavin Chachavalpongpun that has over one million members. In response, Pavin created a new group immediately and gained more than 500,000 members in one day.{{Cite web|title=Facebook reportedly plans to sue Thailand's government over its demand that the company block users within the country from accessing a group critical of its king|url=https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/facebook-reportedly-plans-to-sue-thailands-government-over-its-demand-that-the-company-block-users-within-the-country-from-accessing-a-group-critical-of-its-king/ar-BB18kCwd?li=BBnbfcL|access-date=2020-08-27|website=www.msn.com}}{{Cite web|title=Royalist Marketplace returns|url=https://prachatai.com/english/node/8748|access-date=2020-08-27|website=Prachatai English|language=en}} A Facebook spokesperson stated, "Requests like this are severe, contravene international human rights law, and have a chilling effect on people's ability to express themselves... We work to protect and defend the rights of all internet users and are preparing to legally challenge this request."{{Cite news|date=2020-08-25|title=After block, new Facebook group criticising Thai king gains 500,000 members|language=en|work=Reuters|url=https://af.reuters.com/article/worldNews/idAFKBN25L1J7|access-date=2020-08-27}}{{dead link|date=July 2021|bot=medic}}{{cbignore|bot=medic}}

{{main|Internet censorship in Tunisia}}

Facebook was a major part of the political uprisings of the 'Arab Spring' in 2011.{{Cite journal|last1=Aal|first1=Konstantin|last2=Schorch|first2=Marén|last3=Elkilani|first3=Esma Ben Hadj|last4=Wulf|first4=Volker|date=2019-05-28|title=Facebook and the Mass Media in Tunisia|url=https://www001.zimt.uni-siegen.de/ojs/index.php/mia/article/view/36|journal=Media in Action|language=en|issue=1|pages=135–168|access-date=2019-12-16|archive-date=2022-04-08|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220408030441/https://www001.zimt.uni-siegen.de/ojs/index.php/mia/article/view/36|url-status=dead}}

{{main|Internet regulation in Turkey}}

After photos of Mehmet Selim Kiraz being held at gun point by two terrorists began circulation on social media on 6 April 2015, the Turkish government banned Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, and 166 other websites in the country for hours. The government does not tolerate "anti-government propaganda," and their laws are becoming increasingly more strict. In the 2015 Press Freedom Index from Reporters Without Borders, Turkey ranked 149 of 180 countries.{{Cite news|url=https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Middle-East/2015/0406/Turkey-turns-off-Twitter-and-Facebook-as-censorship-grows|title=Turkey turns off Twitter and Facebook as censorship grows|date=2015-04-06|work=Christian Science Monitor|access-date=2019-05-10|issn=0882-7729|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190510072126/https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Middle-East/2015/0406/Turkey-turns-off-Twitter-and-Facebook-as-censorship-grows|archive-date=2019-05-10|url-status=live}}

Facebook was blocked on 27 February 2020 at 23:30, along with several other social media sites. It happened the day that the military crisis in Idlib escalated.{{Cite web|url=https://netblocks.org/reports/social-media-blocked-in-turkey-as-idlib-military-crisis-escalates-r8VWGXA5|title=Social media blocked in Turkey as Idlib military crisis escalates|date=February 27, 2020}}

Turkmenistan banned Facebook in 2018.{{Cite web|url=https://time.com/6139988/countries-where-twitter-facebook-tiktok-banned/|title=These Are the Countries Where Twitter and Facebook Are Banned}}{{Cite web|url=https://www.news18.com/news/buzz/turkmenistan-where-social-media-is-banned-gets-first-messaging-app-1983887.html|title = Turkmenistan, Where Social Media is Banned, Gets First Messaging App|date = 26 December 2018}}

Since 2021 elections, Facebook has been blocked in the country. The Uganda government blocked Facebook after the social media giant deleted hundreds of accounts of National Resistance Movement supporters it suspected to be fake during the general election last year.{{Cite web |date=2022-08-12 |title=Facebook to remain shut as govt talks with tech giant stall |url=https://www.monitor.co.ug/uganda/news/national/facebook-to-remain-shut-as-govt-talks-with-tech-giant-stall-3912172 |access-date=2022-12-06 |website=Monitor |language=en}} Initially, the government blocked social media and then the internet entirely prior to the general elections. Later on, internet was reinstated in the nation and some social media apps shortly after. However, Facebook remained blocked in the country.

"We have released elements of social media — Twitter, Instagram, Whatsapp — because we think to a less extent, those are not as lethal as Facebook," Opondo said. "So, we shall examine going forward, their posture on these other social media platforms that have been released. And that will inform how soon Facebook is restored."{{Cite web |title=Ugandan Government Restores Social Media Sites, Except Facebook |url=https://www.voanews.com/a/africa_ugandan-government-restores-social-media-sites-except-facebook/6201864.html |access-date=2022-12-06 |website=VOA |language=en}}

Until today, it is unclear if the government will ever reinstate Facebook since the last addresses indicated that Facebook had not complied to the government requests.

{{main|Internet censorship in the United Kingdom}}

In the United Kingdom on 28 April 2011, the day before the wedding of Prince William and Catherine Middleton, a number of politically motivated Facebook groups and pages were removed or suspended from the website as part of a nationwide crackdown on political activity. The groups and pages were mostly concerned with opposition to government spending cuts, and many were used to organize demonstrations in a continuation of the 2010 United Kingdom student protests.{{cite news | url=https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2011/apr/29/facebook-activist-pages-purged | location=London | work=The Guardian | first=Shiv | last=Malik | title=Activists claim purge of Facebook pages | date=April 29, 2011 | access-date=December 17, 2016 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171019200501/https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2011/apr/29/facebook-activist-pages-purged | archive-date=October 19, 2017 | url-status=live }}{{cite news | url=http://mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/04/29/facebook-deactivates-protest-pages-in-britain/ | work=The New York Times | first=Jennifer | last=Preston | title=Facebook Deactivates Protest Pages in Britain | date=April 29, 2011 | access-date=May 14, 2011 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110503215815/http://mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/04/29/facebook-deactivates-protest-pages-in-britain/ | archive-date=May 3, 2011 | url-status=live }} The censorship of the pages coincided with a series of pre-emptive arrests of known activists.{{cite news | url=https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2011/apr/29/royal-wedding-police-criticised-protesters | location=London | work=The Guardian | first1=Robert | last1=Booth | first2=Sandra | last2=Laville | first3=Shiv | last3=Malik | title=Royal wedding: police criticized for pre-emptive strikes against protesters | date=April 29, 2011 | access-date=December 17, 2016 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171005100702/https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2011/apr/29/royal-wedding-police-criticised-protesters | archive-date=October 5, 2017 | url-status=live }} Amongst the arrestees were a communist and socialist, and a few members of a street theater group planning an effigy beheading performance in opposition to the monarchy.{{cite news | url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-13234682 | work=BBC News | title=Royal wedding: Three held over effigy beheading claims | date=April 29, 2011 | access-date=July 21, 2018 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181221135142/https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-13234682 | archive-date=December 21, 2018 | url-status=live }}

A Facebook spokesperson said the pages were disabled as part of a routine sweep because they were created with fake personal profiles, a violation of the company's term of service. In this case a number of the Facebook personal profile pages represented causes, rather than real people. Facebook "offered to help convert the profiles to pages that are designed to represent companies, groups or causes." The spokesperson went on to say that "the Met Police did not ask Facebook to take down this content."

In March 2018, far-right Britain First was removed by Facebook. The pages of the leaders of the party were also taken down following their arrest and incarceration.{{cn|date= January 2025}}

{{main|Internet censorship in Vietnam}}

Facebook was blocked in Vietnam for two weeks in May 2016 due to protest of dissidents.{{cite news|url=https://techcrunch.com/2016/05/17/facebook-blocked-in-vietnam-over-the-weekend-due-to-citizen-protests/|title=Facebook blocked in Vietnam over the weekend due to citizen protest|work=TechCrunch|access-date=May 30, 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180206073825/https://techcrunch.com/2016/05/17/facebook-blocked-in-vietnam-over-the-weekend-due-to-citizen-protests/|archive-date=February 6, 2018|url-status=live}}

Vietnam Facebook users total about 52{{spaces}}million and is a vital tool for their day to day use. However, the government is not accountable to the people which causes abuse of censorship in Vietnam.{{Cite book|title=How Facebook is damaging freedom of expression in Vietnam|last=Khoi|first=M}} In 2018, the government created a huge military unit to block posts containing "wrong views" online.{{cn|date= January 2025}} To appease the government, Facebook removed 160 "toxic" accounts for speech against the Communist Party in 2017.{{Cite news|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/theworldpost/wp/2018/02/19/vietnam-internet/|title=Vietnam's Internet is in trouble|last=Luong|first=Dien|date=February 19, 2018|newspaper=The Washington Post|access-date=May 9, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190510070651/https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/theworldpost/wp/2018/02/19/vietnam-internet/|archive-date=May 10, 2019|url-status=live}}

{{Portal|Freedom of speech|Internet}}

• Censorship by country
• Censorship of Google
• Censorship of Twitter
• Censorship of Wikipedia
• Censorship of YouTube
• Criticism of Facebook
• Internet censorship by country

{{Reflist| 30em}}

{{Censorship and websites}}

{{Facebook navbox}}

{{Internet censorship circumvention technologies}}

Facebook

Category:Facebook

Category:Facebook criticisms and controversies

Category:Internet censorship in China

Category:Censorship