Cephalotes
{{short description|Genus of ants}}
{{distinguish|Cephalotus}}
{{Automatic taxobox
| image = Cephalotes Atratus.jpg
| image_caption = Cephalotes atratus, Soberania National Park, Panama
| taxon = Cephalotes
| authority = Latreille, 1802{{cite book|author= Latreille, P.A. |year=1802| title= Histoire naturelle, generale et particuliere des crustaces et des insectes.| volume= 3|publisher=F. Dufart|place=Paris|url=http://research.amnh.org/entomology/social_insects/ants/publications/0242/0242.pdf}}
| diversity_link = Cephalotes#Species
| diversity = about 130 species
| synonyms =*Cryptocerus Latreille, 1803
- Cyathocephalus Emery, 1915
- Cyathomyrmex Creighton, 1933
- Eucryptocerus Kempf, 1951
- Exocryptocerus Vierbergen & Scheven, 1995
- Harnedia Smith, 1949
- Hypocryptocerus Wheeler, 1920
- Paracryptocerus Emery, 1915
- Zacryptocerus Wheeler, 1911
| type_species = Formica atrata
| type_species_authority = Linnaeus, 1758
}}
Cephalotes is a genus of tree-dwelling ant species from the Americas, commonly known as turtle ants. All appear to be gliding ants, with the ability to "parachute" and steer their fall so as to land back on the tree trunk rather than fall to the ground, which is often flooded.{{Cite journal | last1 = Yanoviak | first1 = S. P. | last2 = Munk | first2 = Y. | last3 = Dudley | first3 = R. | doi = 10.1093/icb/icr006 | title = Evolution and Ecology of Directed Aerial Descent in Arboreal Ants | journal = Integrative and Comparative Biology | volume = 51 | issue = 6 | pages = 944–956 | year = 2011 | pmid = 21562023| doi-access = free }}{{cite web|last1=Wild|first1=Alex|title=Ants use their flattened heads as doors to lock down their nests|url=https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn28481-zoologger-ants-that-use-their-heads-to-lock-down-their-nests/|website=New Scientist|access-date=18 November 2015|date=11 November 2015}}
Ecological specialization and evolution of a soldier caste
One of the most important aspects of the genus' social evolution and adaptation is the manner in which their social organization has been shaped by environmental pressures.Hölldobler, B., Wilson, E. O., & Nelson, M. C. (2009). The superorganism: the beauty, elegance, and strangeness of insect societies. New York: W.W. Norton. This is particularly true of the species Cephalotes rohweri, in which an entire soldier class has evolved as a result of highly specialized nest cavity availability.Powell, S. (2008). Ecological specialization and the evolution of a specialized caste in Cephalotes ant. Functional Ecology, 22, 902-911.
Because ants within Cephalotes use multiple carved nesting cavities found in the trees upon which they live, a cohort of morphologically specialized soldiers has evolved to defend these nesting cavities. They use their unique plate-like heads to block the entrances to the nests, essentially creating a living door to the nest cavities.
In one particular study, Scott Powell tested the hypothesis that "specialized use of cavities with entrances close to the area of one ant head has selected for a morphologically and behaviorally specialized soldier in Cephalotes." This was accomplished by performing comparative studies between four Cephalotes species, each representing one of the four character states of soldier evolution. Cephalotes was ideal for the study because it is the only genus to contain extant species displaying four levels of major morphological evolution. These character states are:
- No soldier present (ancestral)
- Soldiers present with simple domed head
- Soldiers present with incomplete head-disk
- Soldiers present with complete head disk (most advanced)
Another study by Powell examined the process by which environmental factors shape colonial castes within the worker class. However, this study focused more on how colonies adapt their caste systems to ecological factors in their environment.Powell, S. (2009). How ecology shapes caste evolution: linking resource use, morphology, performance and fitness in a superorganism. Evolutionary Biology, 22, 1004-1013.
For the experiment, a species of the genus Cephalotes was used that displayed the highest level of soldier specialization. Three key findings regarding adaptive caste specialization were supported:
- Soldiers were best at defending the specific nesting resource found in nature.
- Colonies used only certain nests (out of all the available nests), and selected only the nesting sites that would maximize soldier performance.
- Soldier performance and limitations had both direct and indirect effects on colony reproduction.
The results of this experiment support the concept that the most specialized soldier phenotype in Cephalotes is a result of adaptation to ecological specialization within a narrow subset of available nests.
Species
File:Cephalotes coffeae CASENT0919595 dorsal.jpg]]
File:Cephalotes incertus casent0173681 dorsal 1.jpg]]
{{Div col}}
- Cephalotes adolphi {{small|(Emery, 1906)}}
- Cephalotes alfaroi {{small|(Emery, 1890)}}
- Cephalotes angustus {{small|(Mayr, 1862)}}
- Cephalotes argentatus {{small|(Smith, 1853)}}
- Cephalotes argentiventris {{small|De Andrade, 1999}}
- Cephalotes atratus {{small|(Linnaeus, 1758)}}
- Cephalotes auriger {{small|De Andrade, 1999}}
- Cephalotes basalis {{small|(Smith, 1876)}}
- Cephalotes betoi {{small|De Andrade, 1999}}
- Cephalotes biguttatus {{small|(Emery, 1890)}}
- Cephalotes bimaculatus {{small|(Smith, 1860)}}
- Cephalotes bivestitus {{small|(Santschi, 1922)}}
- Cephalotes bohlsi {{small|(Emery, 1896)}}
- Cephalotes borgmeieri {{small|(Kempf, 1951)}}
- Cephalotes bruchi {{small|(Forel, 1912)}}
- Cephalotes chacmul {{small|Snelling, 1999}}
- Cephalotes christopherseni {{small|(Forel, 1912)}}
- Cephalotes clypeatus {{small|(Fabricius, 1804)}}
- Cephalotes coffeae {{small|(Kempf, 1953)}}
- Cephalotes columbicus {{small|(Forel, 1912)}}
- Cephalotes complanatus {{small|(Guerin-Meneville, 1844)}}
- Cephalotes conspersus {{small|(Smith, 1867)}}
- Cephalotes cordatus {{small|(Smith, 1853)}}
- Cephalotes cordiae {{small|(Stitz, 1913)}}
- Cephalotes cordiventris {{small|(Santschi, 1931)}}
- Cephalotes crenaticeps {{small|(Mayr, 1866)}}
- Cephalotes cristatus {{small|(Emery, 1890)}}
- Cephalotes curvistriatus {{small|(Forel, 1899)}}
- Cephalotes decolor {{small|De Andrade, 1999}}
- Cephalotes decoloratus {{small|De Andrade, 1999}}
- Cephalotes dentidorsum {{small|De Andrade, 1999}}
- Cephalotes depressus {{small|(Klug, 1824)}}
- Cephalotes dorbignyanus {{small|(Smith, 1853)}}
- Cephalotes duckei {{small|(Forel, 1906)}}
- Cephalotes ecuadorialis {{small|De Andrade, 1999}}
- Cephalotes eduarduli {{small|(Forel, 1921)}}
- Cephalotes emeryi {{small|(Forel, 1912)}}
- Cephalotes fiebrigi {{small|(Forel, 1906)}}
- Cephalotes flavigaster {{small|De Andrade, 1999}}
- Cephalotes foliaceus {{small|(Emery, 1906)}}
- Cephalotes fossithorax {{small|(Santschi, 1921)}}
- Cephalotes frigidus {{small|(Kempf, 1960)}}
- Cephalotes gabicamacho {{small|Oliveira, Powell & Feitosa, 2021}}{{Cite journal|last1=Machado Oliveira|first1=Aline|last2=Powell|first2=Scott|last3=Machado Feitosa|first3=Rodrigo|date=13 September 2021|title=A taxonomic study of the Brazilian turtle ants (Formicidae: Myrmicinae: Cephalotes)|journal=Revista Brasileira de Entomologia|volume=65|issue=3|doi=10.1590/1806-9665-RBENT-2021-0028|doi-access=free}}
- Cephalotes goeldii {{small|(Forel, 1912)}}
- Cephalotes goniodontes {{small|De Andrade, 1999}}
- Cephalotes grandinosus {{small|(Smith, 1860)}}
- Cephalotes guayaki {{small|De Andrade, 1999}}
- Cephalotes haemorrhoidalis {{small|(Latreille, 1802)}}
- Cephalotes hamulus {{small|(Roger, 1863)}}
- Cephalotes hirsutus {{small|De Andrade, 1999}}
- Cephalotes inaequalis {{small|(Mann, 1916)}}
- Cephalotes inca {{small|(Santschi, 1911)}}
- Cephalotes incertus {{small|(Emery, 1906)}}
- Cephalotes insularis {{small|(Wheeler, 1934)}}
- Cephalotes jamaicensis {{small|(Forel, 1922)}}
- Cephalotes jheringi {{small|(Emery, 1894)}}
- Cephalotes klugi {{small|(Emery, 1894)}}
- Cephalotes kukulcan {{small|Snelling, 1999}}
- Cephalotes laminatus {{small|(Smith, 1860)}}
- Cephalotes lanuginosus {{small|(Santschi, 1919)}}
- Cephalotes lenca {{small|De Andrade, 1999}}
- Cephalotes liepini {{small|De Andrade, 1999}}
- Cephalotes liogaster {{small|(Santschi, 1916)}}
- Cephalotes liviaprado {{small|Oliveira, Powell & Feitosa, 2021}}
- Cephalotes maculatus {{small|(Smith, 1876)}}
- Cephalotes manni {{small|(Kempf, 1951)}}
- Cephalotes marginatus {{small|(Fabricius, 1804)}}
- Cephalotes mariadeandrade {{small|Oliveira, Powell & Feitosa, 2021}}
- Cephalotes marycorn {{small|Oliveira, Powell & Feitosa, 2021}}
- Cephalotes membranaceus {{small|(Klug, 1824)}}
- Cephalotes minutus {{small|(Fabricius, 1804)}}
- Cephalotes mompox {{small|De Andrade, 1999}}
- Cephalotes monicaulyssea {{small|Oliveira, Powell & Feitosa, 2021}}
- Cephalotes multispinosus {{small|(Norton, 1868)}}
- Cephalotes nilpiei {{small|De Andrade, 1999}}
- Cephalotes notatus {{small|(Mayr, 1866)}}
- Cephalotes oculatus {{small|(Spinola, 1851)}}
- Cephalotes opacus {{small|Santschi, 1920}}
- Cephalotes pallens {{small|(Klug, 1824)}}
- Cephalotes pallidicephalus {{small|(Smith, 1876)}}
- Cephalotes pallidoides {{small|De Andrade, 1999}}
- Cephalotes pallidus {{small|De Andrade, 1999}}
- Cephalotes palta {{small|De Andrade, 1999}}
- Cephalotes palustris {{small|De Andrade, 1999}}
- Cephalotes patei {{small|(Kempf, 1951)}}
- Cephalotes patellaris {{small|(Mayr, 1866)}}
- Cephalotes pavonii {{small|(Latreille, 1809)}}
- Cephalotes pellans {{small|De Andrade, 1999}}
- Cephalotes persimilis {{small|De Andrade, 1999}}
- Cephalotes persimplex {{small|De Andrade, 1999}}
- Cephalotes peruviensis {{small|De Andrade, 1999}}
- Cephalotes pileini {{small|De Andrade, 1999}}
- Cephalotes pilosus {{small|(Emery, 1896)}}
- Cephalotes pinelii {{small|(Guerin-Meneville, 1844)}}
- Cephalotes placidus {{small|(Smith, 1860)}}
- Cephalotes porrasi {{small|(Wheeler, 1942)}}
- Cephalotes prodigiosus {{small|(Santschi, 1921)}}
- Cephalotes pusillus {{small|(Klug, 1824)}}
- Cephalotes quadratus {{small|(Mayr, 1868)}}
- Cephalotes ramiphilus {{small|(Forel, 1904)}}
- Cephalotes rohweri {{small|(Wheeler, 1916)}}
- Cephalotes scutulatus {{small|(Smith, 1867)}}
- Cephalotes serraticeps {{small|(Smith, 1858)}}
- Cephalotes setulifer {{small|(Emery, 1894)}}
- Cephalotes simillimus {{small|(Kempf, 1951)}}
- Cephalotes sobrius {{small|(Kempf, 1958)}}
- Cephalotes solidus {{small|(Kempf, 1974)}}
- Cephalotes specularis {{small|Brandão et al., 2014}}
- Cephalotes spinosus {{small|(Mayr, 1862)}}
- Cephalotes supercilii {{small|De Andrade, 1999}}
- Cephalotes targionii {{small|(Emery, 1894)}}
- Cephalotes texanus {{small|(Santschi, 1915)}}
- Cephalotes toltecus {{small|De Andrade, 1999}}
- Cephalotes trichophorus {{small|De Andrade, 1999}}
- Cephalotes umbraculatus {{small|(Fabricius, 1804)}}
- Cephalotes unimaculatus {{small|(Smith, 1853)}}
- Cephalotes ustus {{small|(Kempf, 1973)}}
- Cephalotes varians {{small|(Smith, 1876)}}
- Cephalotes vinosus {{small|(Wheeler, 1936)}}
- Cephalotes wheeleri {{small|(Forel, 1901)}}
{{div col end}}
File:Cephalotes alveolatus SMNSDO5691 profile.jpg]]
=Fossil species=
The fossil record is restricted to the Miocene with species recovered from both Dominican and Mexican ambers. Species were initially described by Gijsbertus Vierbergen and Joachim Scheven (1995) whole placed the species into the genera Cephalotes, Eucryptocerus, Exocryptocerus and Zacryptocerus. All four genera were revised four years later by Maria De Andrade and Cesare Baroni Urbani (1999, who synonymized them under Cephalotes.{{cite journal |last1=de Andrade |first1=M. L. |last2=Baroni Urbani |first2=C. |year=1999 |title=Diversity and adaptation in the ant genus Cephalotes, past and present |journal=Stuttgarter Beiträge zur Naturkunde, Serie B (Geologie und Paläontologie) |volume=271 |pages=537–538}}
The Dominican amber species:
{{div col}}
- †Cephalotes alveolatus {{small|(Vierbergen & Scheven, 1995)}}
- †Cephalotes bloosi {{small|Baroni Urbani, 1999}}
- †Cephalotes brevispineus {{small|De Andrade & Baroni Urbani, 1999}}
- †Cephalotes caribicus {{small|De Andrade & Baroni Urbani, 1999}}
- †Cephalotes dieteri {{small|De Andrade & Baroni Urbani, 1999}}
- †Cephalotes hispaniolicus {{small|De Andrade & Baroni Urbani, 1999}}
- †Cephalotes integerrimus {{small|(Vierbergen & Scheven, 1995)}}
- †Cephalotes jansei {{small|(Vierbergen & Scheven, 1995)}}
- †Cephalotes obscurus {{small|(Vierbergen & Scheven, 1995)}}
- †Cephalotes resinae {{small|De Andrade, 1999}}
- †Cephalotes serratus {{small|(Vierbergen & Scheven, 1995)}}
- †Cephalotes squamosus {{small|(Vierbergen & Scheven, 1995)}}
- †Cephalotes sucinus {{small|De Andrade, 1999}}
- †Cephalotes taino {{small|De Andrade, 1999}}
{{div col end}}
The Mexican amber species:
- †Cephalotes maya {{small|De Andrade, 1999}}
- †Cephalotes olmecus {{small|De Andrade, 1999}}
- †Cephalotes poinari {{small|Baroni Urbani, 1999}}
- †Cephalotes ventriosus {{small|De Andrade, 1999}}
See also
- Aphantochilus, a genus of crab spiders known to mimic Cephalotes species
References
{{Reflist}}
External links
- {{commons category-inline|Cephalotes|Cephalotes}}
{{Taxonbar|from=Q374613}}