Charles Murray (political scientist)

{{Short description|American political scientist (born 1943)}}

{{Use mdy dates|date=June 2015}}

{{Infobox academic

| non-academic = yes

| name = Charles Murray

| image = Charles Murray Speaking at FreedomFest.jpeg

| birth_name = Charles Alan Murray

| birth_date = {{birth date and age|1943|1|8}}

| birth_place = Newton, Iowa, U.S.

| death_date =

| death_place =

| spouse = {{plainlist|

  • {{marriage|Suchart Dej-Udom|1966|1980|end=div}}
  • {{marriage|Catherine Bly Cox|1983}}

}}

| children = 4

| awards = Irving Kristol Award (2009)
Kistler Prize (2011)

| website =

| education = Harvard University (BA)
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MA, PhD)

| thesis_title = Investment and Tithing in Thai Villages: A Behavioral Study of Rural Modernization

| thesis_url = http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/85708

| thesis_year = 1974

| school_tradition = Right-libertarianism

| doctoral_advisor = Lucian Pye

| discipline = Political science

| workplaces = American Institutes for Research
Manhattan Institute for Policy Research
American Enterprise Institute

| main_interests = Race and intelligence
Social welfare policy

| notable_works = Losing Ground (1984)
The Bell Curve (1994)
Coming Apart (2012)

| caption = Murray in 2013

}}

Charles Alan Murray ({{IPAc-en|ˈ|m|ɜr|i}}; born January 8, 1943) is an American political scientist. He is the W.H. Brady Scholar at the American Enterprise Institute, a conservative think tank in Washington, D.C.{{cite web |title=Charles Murray AEI Scholar |url=https://www.aei.org/profile/charles-murray/ |access-date=November 12, 2020 |author= |work=American Enterprise Institute website |publisher=American Enterprise Institute |archive-date=November 11, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201111195910/https://www.aei.org/profile/charles-murray/ |url-status=live }}

Murray's work is highly controversial.{{Cite news|last=Martin|first=Michel|date=7 January 2018|title=Controversial Social Scientist Charles Murray Retires|work=National Public Radio|url=https://www.npr.org/2018/01/07/576359217/controversial-social-scientist-charles-murray-retires|access-date=11 June 2020|archive-date=June 12, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200612013102/https://www.npr.org/2018/01/07/576359217/controversial-social-scientist-charles-murray-retires|url-status=live}}{{Cite news|last=Siegel|first=Eric|date=12 April 2017|title=The Real Problem with Charles Murray and "The Bell Curve"|work=Scientific American|url=https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/voices/the-real-problem-with-charles-murray-and-the-bell-curve/|access-date=11 June 2020|archive-date=July 30, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200730214241/https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/voices/the-real-problem-with-charles-murray-and-the-bell-curve/|url-status=live}}{{Cite news|last=Lemann|first=Nicholas|date=18 January 1997|title=The Bell Curve Flattened: Subsequent research has seriously undercut the claims of the controversial best seller|work=Slate|url=https://slate.com/news-and-politics/1997/01/the-bell-curve-flattened.html|access-date=11 June 2020|archive-date=August 12, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200812031029/https://slate.com/news-and-politics/1997/01/the-bell-curve-flattened.html|url-status=live}}{{Cite web|date=2017-03-06|title=Bell Curve author Charles Murray speaks out after speech cut short by protests|url=http://www.theguardian.com/books/2017/mar/06/bell-curve-author-charles-murray-speaks-out-after-speech-cut-short-by-protests|access-date=2021-05-02|website=The Guardian|language=en|archive-date=May 3, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210503002911/https://www.theguardian.com/books/2017/mar/06/bell-curve-author-charles-murray-speaks-out-after-speech-cut-short-by-protests|url-status=live}}{{Cite news|last=Sehgal|first=Parul|date=12 February 2020|title=Charles Murray Returns, Nodding to Caution but Still Courting Controversy|work=The New York Times|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2020/02/12/books/review-human-diversity-charles-murray.html|access-date=May 2, 2021|archive-date=March 1, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210301103101/https://www.nytimes.com/2020/02/12/books/review-human-diversity-charles-murray.html|url-status=live}} His book Losing Ground: American Social Policy, 1950–1980 (1984) discussed the American welfare system. In the book The Bell Curve (1994), he and co-author Richard Herrnstein argue that in 20th-century American society, intelligence became a better predictor than parental socioeconomic status or education level of many individual outcomes, including income, job performance, pregnancy out of wedlock, and crime, and that social welfare programs and education efforts to improve social outcomes for the disadvantaged are largely counterproductive. The Bell Curve also argues that average intelligence quotient (IQ) differences between racial and ethnic groups are at least partly genetic in origin, a view that is now considered discredited by mainstream science.{{Cite journal |date=25 May 2017 |title=Intelligence research should not be held back by its past |url=https://www.nature.com/articles/nature.2017.22021 |journal=Nature |volume=545 |issue=7655 |pages=385–386 |doi=10.1038/nature.2017.22021 |pmid=28541341 |bibcode=2017Natur.545R.385. |quote=Historical measurements of skull volume and brain weight were done to advance claims of the racial superiority of white people. More recently, the (genuine but closing) gap between the average IQ scores of groups of black and white people in the United States has been falsely attributed to genetic differences between the races.}}{{Cite journal |last1=Bird |first1=Kevin |last2=Jackson |first2=John P. |last3=Winston |first3=Andrew S. |date=2024 |title=Confronting Scientific Racism in Psychology: Lessons from Evolutionary Biology and Genetics |url=https://psycnet.apa.org/doiLanding?doi=10.1037%2Famp0001228 |journal=American Psychologist |volume=79 |issue=4 |pages=497–508 |doi=10.1037/amp0001228 |pmid=39037836 |quote=Recent articles claim that the folk categories of race are genetically meaningful divisions, and that evolved genetic differences among races and nations are important for explaining immutable differences in cognitive ability, educational attainment, crime, sexual behavior, and wealth; all claims that are opposed by a strong scientific consensus to the contrary. ... Despite the veneer of modern science, RHR [racial hereditarian research] psychologists’ recent efforts merely repeat discredited racist ideas of a century ago. The issue is truly one of scientific standards; if psychology embraced the scientific practices of evolutionary biology and genetics, current forms of RHR would not be publishable in reputable scholarly journals.}}

Early life and education

Of Scotch-Irish ancestry,{{cite web|url=http://www.bible-researcher.com/murray1.html|title=The Inequality Taboo, by Charles Murray|website=www.bible-researcher.com|access-date=July 13, 2016|archive-date=August 27, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190827180114/http://www.bible-researcher.com/murray1.html|url-status=live}}{{cite web|url=http://www.jewishmag.com/115mag/smartjews/smartjews.htm|title=The Secret of Jewish Genius|first=regenstein@mindspring.com, Jewish|last=Magazine|website=www.jewishmag.com|access-date=July 13, 2016|archive-date=April 23, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190423144619/http://www.jewishmag.com/115mag/smartjews/smartjews.htm|url-status=live}} Murray was born on January 8, 1943, in Newton, Iowa,{{cite encyclopedia |year=2013 |title=Murray, Charles 1943– |editor-last=Ruby |editor-first=Mary |encyclopedia=Contemporary Authors, New Revision Series |volume=252 |location=Farmington Hills, Michigan |publisher=Gale |pages=310–316 |isbn=978-1-4144-8923-0 |issn=0275-7176}} and raised in a Republican, "Norman Rockwell kind of family" that stressed moral responsibility. He is the son of Frances B. (née Patrick) and Alan B. Murray, an executive for the Maytag Company.{{cite web|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=nZIYAAAAIAAJ&q=%22Alan+B.+Murray,+an+executive+with+the%22+%22AND%22|title=Current Biography Yearbook|year=1986|publisher=H.W. Wilson Co.|via=Google Books|access-date=February 9, 2016|archive-date=January 27, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200127222118/https://books.google.com/books?id=nZIYAAAAIAAJ&q=%22Alan+B.+Murray,+an+executive+with+the%22+%22AND%22|url-status=live}} His youth was marked by a rebellious and pranksterish sensibility.{{cite web|author=Jason DeParle|url=https://www.nytimes.com/1994/10/09/magazine/daring-research-or-social-science-pornography-charles-murray.html|title=Daring Research or 'Social Science Pornography'?: Charles Murray|work=The New York Times|date=October 9, 1994|access-date=January 11, 2011|archive-date=January 29, 2011|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110129125309/http://www.nytimes.com/1994/10/09/magazine/daring-research-or-social-science-pornography-charles-murray.html|url-status=live}} As a teen, he played pool at a hangout for juvenile delinquents, developed debating skills, espoused labor unionism (to his parents' annoyance), and on one occasion helped burn a cross that he and his friends had erected near a police station.DeParle 1994, pp. 3–4. DeParle's biographical article finds throughout Murray's life the persona of a high-school prankster who "only [learns] later what the fuss [is] all about" (p. 12). Some critics have found particularly revealing DeParle's discussion of the cross-burning incident and Murray's subsequent choice to not mention it. Murray and his chums had formed a kind of good guys' gang, "the Mallows". In the fall of 1960, during their senior year, they nailed some scrap wood into a cross, adorned it with fireworks, and set it ablaze on a hill beside the police station, with scattered marshmallows as a calling card.

:Rutledge [a social worker and former juvenile delinquent] who was still hanging around the pool hall [and considers some of Murray's other memories to be idealized] recalls his astonishment the next day when the talk turned to racial persecution in a town with two black families. "There wouldn't have been a racist thought in our simple-minded minds," he says. "That's how unaware we were."

:A long pause follows when Murray is reminded of the event. "Incredibly, incredibly dumb", he says. "But it never crossed our minds that this had any larger significance. And I look back on that and say, 'How on earth could we be so oblivious?' I guess it says something about that day and age that it didn't cross our minds" (p. 4).

Murray credits the SAT with helping him get out of Newton and into Harvard. "Back in 1961, the test helped get me into Harvard from a small Iowa town by giving me a way to show that I could compete with applicants from Exeter and Andover," wrote Murray. "Ever since, I have seen the SAT as the friend of the little guy, just as James Bryant Conant, president of Harvard, said it would be when he urged the SAT upon the nation in the 1940s."{{cite web|url=http://american.com/archive/2007/july-august-magazine-contents/abolish-the-sat |author=Charles Murray|title=Abolish the SAT|publisher=The American |date=July–August 2007 |access-date=January 11, 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110101113633/http://www.american.com/archive/2007/july-august-magazine-contents/abolish-the-sat |archive-date=January 1, 2011 |df=mdy }} However, in a 2012 op-ed published in The New York Times, Murray argued in favor of removing the SAT's role in college admissions, commenting that the SAT "has become a symbol of new-upper-class privilege, as people assume (albeit wrongly) that high scores are purchased through the resources of private schools and expensive test preparation programs".{{cite news |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/08/opinion/reforms-for-the-new-upper-class.html |title=Narrowing the New Class Divide |work=The New York Times |date=March 8, 2012 |access-date=March 8, 2012 |archive-date=March 8, 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120308174707/http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/08/opinion/reforms-for-the-new-upper-class.html |url-status=live |last1=Murray |first1=Charles A. }}

Murray earned a BA in history from Harvard University in 1965 and a PhD in political science from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) in 1974.{{cite thesis |last=Murray |first=Charles Alan |year=1974 |title=Investment and Tithing in Thai Villages: A Behavioral Study of Rural Modernization |degree=PhD |location=Cambridge, Massachusetts |publisher=Massachusetts Institute of Technology |hdl=1721.1/85708 |hdl-access=free}}

Peace Corps

Murray left for the Peace Corps in Thailand in 1965, staying abroad for six years.DeParle, pp. 4–5. At the beginning of this period, Murray kindled a romance with his Thai Buddhist language instructor (in Hawaii), Suchart Dej-Udom, the daughter of a wealthy Thai businessman, who was "born with one hand and a mind sharp enough to outscore the rest of the country on the college entrance exam". Murray subsequently proposed by mail from Thailand, and their marriage began the following year, a move that Murray now considers youthful rebellion. "I'm getting married to a one-handed Thai Buddhist," he said. "This was not the daughter-in-law that would have normally presented itself to an Iowa couple."

Murray credits his time in the Peace Corps in Thailand with his lifelong interest in Asia. "There are aspects of Asian culture as it is lived that I still prefer to Western culture, 30 years after I last lived in Thailand," says Murray. "Two of my children are half-Asian. Apart from those personal aspects, I have always thought that the Chinese and Japanese civilizations had elements that represented the apex of human accomplishment in certain domains."{{cite web |url=http://www.isteve.com/2003_QA_with_Charles_Murray_on_Human_Accomplishment.htm |title=Q&A with Charles Murray on Human Accomplishment |author=Steve Sailer. |publisher=Isteve.com |date=October 16, 2003 |agency=UPI |access-date=January 11, 2011 |archive-date=October 4, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191004113858/http://www.isteve.com/2003_QA_with_Charles_Murray_on_Human_Accomplishment.htm |url-status=live }}

His tenure with the Peace Corps ended in 1968, and during the remainder of his time in Thailand he worked on an American Institutes for Research (AIR) covert counter-insurgency program for the US military in cooperation with the CIA.{{cite web |url=http://shameproject.com/profile/charles-murray/ |title=Charles Murray |website=S.H.A.M.E. Project |date=January 4, 2013 |access-date=March 6, 2017 |archive-date=October 29, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191029115036/http://shameproject.com/profile/charles-murray/ |url-status=live }}{{cite magazine |author=Eric R. Wolf |author2=Joseph G. Jorgensen |url=http://www.nybooks.com/articles/1970/11/19/a-special-supplement-anthropology-on-the-warpath-i/ |title=A Special Supplement: Anthropology on the Warpath in Thailand |date=November 19, 1970 |magazine=The New York Review of Books |access-date=March 6, 2017 |archive-date=August 23, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180823120148/https://www.nybooks.com/articles/1970/11/19/a-special-supplement-anthropology-on-the-warpath-i/ |url-status=live }}{{cite book |title=Anthropology Goes to War: Professional Ethics and Counterinsurgency in Thailand |last=Wakin |first=Eric |publisher= Center for Southeast Asian Studies |location=Madison, WI|year=1998}}

Recalling his time in Thailand in a 2014 episode of Conversations with Bill Kristol, Murray commented that his worldview was fundamentally shaped by his time there, "Essentially, most of what you read in my books I learned in Thai villages." He continued:, "I suddenly was struck first by the enormous discrepancy between what Bangkok thought was important to the villagers and what the villagers wanted out of government. And the second thing I got out of it was that when the government change agent showed up, the village went to hell in terms of its internal governance."Murray, Charles. (July 14, 2014) [http://conversationswithbillkristol.org/video/charles-murray/] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150205080613/http://conversationswithbillkristol.org/video/charles-murray/|date=February 5, 2015}} Conversationswithbillkristol.org Retrieved on 2014-09-18.

Murray's work in the Peace Corps and subsequent social research in Thailand for research firms associated with the US government led to the subject of his doctoral thesis in political science at MIT, in which he argued against bureaucratic intervention in the lives of Thai villagers.De Parle 1994.McIntosh 2006: "My epiphany came in Thailand in the 1960s, when I first came to understand how badly bureaucracies dealt with human problems in the villages, and how well (with qualifications) villagers dealt with their own problems given certain conditions." [http://www.gnxp.com/blog/2006/07/10-questions-for-charles-murray.php Gene Expression: 10 questions for Charles Murray] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101204000746/http://www.gnxp.com/blog/2006/07/10-questions-for-charles-murray.php |date=December 4, 2010 }}

Divorce and remarriage

By the 1980s, his marriage to Suchart Dej-Udom had been unhappy for years, but "his childhood lessons on the importance of responsibility brought him slowly to the idea that divorce was an honorable alternative, especially with young children involved."DeParle, p. 7.

Murray divorced Dej-Udom after fourteen years of marriage and three years later married Catherine Bly Cox (born 1949, Newton, Iowa),{{cite web |url=http://oasis.lib.harvard.edu/oasis/deliver/~sch00533 |title=Cox, Catherine Bly, 1949– . Papers, 1962–1967: A Finding Aid |access-date=September 21, 2008 |date=January 1986 |work=Radcliffe College |publisher=harvard.edu |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170103015953/http://oasis.lib.harvard.edu/oasis/deliver/~sch00533 |archive-date=January 3, 2017 }} an English literature instructor at Rutgers University. Cox was initially dubious when she saw his conservative reading choices, and she spent long hours "trying to reconcile his shocking views with what she saw as his deep decency". In 1989, Murray and Cox co-authored a book on the Apollo program, Apollo: Race to the Moon.[https://history.nasa.gov/nltr18-1.htm Nasa Symposium on Forty Years of Human Spaceflight] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171225230449/https://history.nasa.gov/nltr18-1.htm |date=December 25, 2017 }} (2001). The book was well reviewed: "Rich, densely packed and beautifully told.... Filled with cliffhangers, suspense and spine-tingling adventure". – Charles Sheffield, Washington Post Book World, July 9, 1989. "Heart-gripping.... So brilliantly told one can almost smell the perspiration in Houston Mission Control". Charles Petit, San Francisco Chronicle, July 9, 1989: Murray attends and Cox is a member of a Quaker meeting in Virginia, and they live in Frederick County, Maryland near Washington, D.C.Quaker meeting: [http://tqe.quaker.org/2003/TQE082-EN-BellCurve1.html The Quaker Economist #82 – The Bell Curve] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160303193028/http://tqe.quaker.org/2003/TQE082-EN-BellCurve1.html |date=March 3, 2016 }}; current location: DeParle p. 8.

Murray has four children, two by each wife.Two children from each marriage: DeParle, pp. 7–8. While his second wife, Catherine Bly Cox, had converted to Quakerism {{as of|2014|lc=y}}, Murray still considered himself an agnostic.{{Cite book|last=Murray|first=Charles A.|url=http://archive.org/details/curmudgeonsguide0000murr|title=The curmudgeon's guide to getting ahead: dos and don'ts of right behavior, tough thinking, clear writing, and living a good life|date=2014|publisher=New York : Crown Business|others=Oliver Wendell Holmes Library Phillips Academy|isbn=978-0-8041-4144-4}} Murray describes himself as a "wannabe Christian" who takes faith seriously but has yet to acquire deep faith.{{Cite web|last=Olasky|first=Marvin|title=Charles Murray and God|url=https://world.wng.org/2012/10/charles_murray_and_god|access-date=2021-02-24|website=world.wng.org|language=en}}{{Dead link|date=November 2023 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}

Research

Murray continued research work at AIR, one of the largest of the private social science research organizations, upon his return to the US. From 1974 to 1981, Murray worked for the AIR eventually becoming chief political scientist. While at AIR, Murray supervised evaluations in the fields of urban education, welfare services, daycare, adolescent pregnancy, services for the elderly, and criminal justice.{{Cite web |last=Hazlett |first=Thomas W. |date=1985-05-01 |title=Interview with Charles Murray |url=https://reason.com/1985/05/01/interview-with-charles-murray/ |access-date=2023-11-05 |website=Reason.com |language=en-US}}

From 1981 to 1990, he was a fellow with the conservative Manhattan Institute where he wrote Losing Ground, which heavily influenced the welfare reform debate in 1996, and In Pursuit.{{Cite journal |last=Smith |first=Allison B. |date=1997 |title=The Breakdown of the American Family: Why Welfare Reform Is Not the Answer |url=https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/ndlep11&id=771&div=&collection= |journal=Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy |volume=11 |pages=761}} He has been a fellow of the conservative American Enterprise Institute since 1990 and was a frequent contributor to The Public Interest, a journal of conservative politics and culture. In March 2009, he received AEI's highest honor, the Irving Kristol Award. He has also received a doctorate honoris causa from Universidad Francisco Marroquín.{{cite web |url=http://www.newmedia.ufm.edu/gsm/index.php?title=Doctorado_Honor%C3%ADfico_durante_el_Acto_de_Graduaci%C3%B3n,_Charles_Murray |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081220044712/http://www.newmedia.ufm.edu/gsm/index.php?title=Doctorado_Honor%C3%ADfico_durante_el_Acto_de_Graduaci%C3%B3n,_Charles_Murray |archive-date=December 20, 2008 |title=Doctorado Honorífico durante el Acto de Graduación, Charles Murray |language=es |publisher=Newmedia.ufm.edu |access-date=January 11, 2011 }} Murray has received grants from the conservative Bradley Foundation to support his scholarship, including the writing of The Bell Curve.

=''Losing Ground''=

Murray argues in his book Losing Ground: American Social Policy, 1950–1980 (1984) that social welfare programs actually hurt society as a whole, as well as the very people those programs are trying to help, and concludes that these programs should therefore be eliminated.{{cite journal | last = Mattison | first = Edward| title = Stop Making Sense: Charles Murray and the Reagan Perspective on Social Welfare Policy and the Poor | journal = Yale Law & Policy Review | volume = 4 | number = 1 | pages = 90–102 | date = 1985}} Murray proposes three "laws" of social programs to defend this policy prescription:

  1. "Law of Imperfect Selection": Any objective rule that defines eligibility for a social transfer program will irrationally exclude some persons.
  2. "Law of Unintended Rewards": Any social transfer increases the net value of being in the condition that prompted the transfer.
  3. "Law of Net Harm": The less likely it is that the unwanted behavior will change voluntarily, the more likely it is that a program to induce change will cause net harm.{{Citation| last = Taylor | first = Joan Kennedy | contribution = Deregulating the Poor | editor-last = Boaz | editor-first = David | title = Toward Liberty: The Idea that is Changing the World| pages = 81–94|publisher = Cato Institute | place = Washington, D.C. |year = 2002}}

=''The Bell Curve''=

{{Main|The Bell Curve}}

{{external media | width = 210px | float = right | headerimage= | video1 = [https://www.c-span.org/video/?61965-1/bell-curve Booknotes interview with Murray on The Bell Curve, December 4, 1994], C-SPAN}}

The Bell Curve: Intelligence and Class Structure in American Life (1994) is a controversial bestseller that Charles Murray wrote with Harvard professor Richard J. Herrnstein. The book's title comes from the bell-shaped normal distribution of IQ scores. Its central thesis is that in American society in the 20th century intelligence had become a better predictor of many factors including income, job performance, unwed pregnancy, and crime than one's parents' socio-economic status or education level. The book also argued that those with high intelligence (the "cognitive elite") were becoming separated from those with average and below-average intelligence, and that this constituted a dangerous social trend. He also warned of a merger of the "cognitive elite" with the "wealth elite", which would become increasingly isolated and could result in an authoritarian "custodial state". After its publication, academics criticized the book over his assertions on race and IQ.{{cite book|author1=Harold Berlak|editor1-last=Shapiro|editor1-first=H. Svi|editor2-last=Purpel|editor2-first=David E.|title=Critical Social Issues in American Education: Democracy and Meaning in a Globalizing World|publisher=Routledge|isbn=978-1138453043|page=224|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=hKuPAgAAQBAJ&q=charles%20Murray|access-date=16 September 2017|chapter=Racism and the Achievement Gap|date=2004-09-22|archive-date=July 19, 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220719031258/https://books.google.com/books?id=hKuPAgAAQBAJ&q=charles+Murray|url-status=live}}{{cite web |title=Charles Murray |url=https://www.splcenter.org/fighting-hate/extremist-files/individual/charles-murray |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190306111724/https://www.splcenter.org/fighting-hate/extremist-files/individual/charles-murray |archive-date=March 6, 2019 |access-date=September 27, 2020 |publisher=Southern Poverty Law Center}} Some said it supported long-discredited "scientific racism"{{cite book|author1=Christopher R. Brand|author2=Denis Constales|editor1-last=Nyborg|editor1-first=Helmuth|editor1-link=Helmuth Nyborg|title=The Scientific Study of General Intelligence: Tribute to Arthur Jensen|date=2003|publisher=Pergamon|isbn=978-0080437934|page=505|chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=rPNFXBnwuNoC&q=%22Charles%20Murray%22%20%22scientific%20racism%22&pg=PA505|chapter=Why ignore the g factor? – Historical considerations|quote=Herrnstein and Murray were swiftly and widely denounced as 'attempting to revive scientific racism'|access-date=March 9, 2021|archive-date=April 7, 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220407103456/https://books.google.com/books?id=rPNFXBnwuNoC&q=%22Charles%20Murray%22%20%22scientific%20racism%22&pg=PA505|url-status=live}}{{cite book|author1=Jerry Phillips|editor1-last=Strickland|editor1-first=Ronald|title=Growing Up Postmodern: Neoliberalism and the War on the Young|date=2002|publisher=Rowman and Littlefield|isbn=978-0742516519|page=61|chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=oxsj7-aTN9IC&q=%22Charles%20Murray%22%20%22scientific%20racism%22&pg=PA61|access-date=16 September 2017|chapter=Richard Price and the Ordeal of the Post-Modern City|archive-date=July 19, 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220719031318/https://books.google.com/books?id=oxsj7-aTN9IC&q=%22Charles+Murray%22+%22scientific+racism%22&pg=PA61|url-status=live}}{{cite book|author1=Purpel, David E. |author2=Shapiro, H. A. |title=Critical Social Issues in American Education: Democracy and Meaning in a Globalizing World|url=https://archive.org/details/criticalsocialis00shap |url-access=limited |publisher=L. Erlbaum Associates|location=Hillsdale, N.J|year=2005|page=[https://archive.org/details/criticalsocialis00shap/page/n245 228]|isbn=080584452X}}Dennis, Rutledge M. "Social Darwinism, Scientific Racism, and the Metaphysics of Race". The Journal of Negro Education 64, no. 3 (1995): 243–252. {{doi|10.2307/2967206}}. and a number of books were written to rebut The Bell Curve. Those works included a 1996 edition of evolutionary biologist Stephen Jay Gould's The Mismeasure of Man; a collection of essays, The Bell Curve Wars (1995), reacting to Murray and Herrnstein's commentary; and The Bell Curve Debate (1995), whose essays similarly respond to issues raised in The Bell Curve. Arthur S. Goldberger and Charles F. Manski critiqued the empirical methods supporting the book's hypotheses.{{cite journal |last1=Goldberger |first1=Arthur S. |last2=Manski |first2=Charles F. |author-link1=Arthur S. Goldberger |author-link2=Charles F. Manski |title=Review Article: The Bell Curve by Herrnstein and Murray |journal=Journal of Economic Literature |date=1995 |volume=33 |issue=2 |pages=762–776 |jstor=2729026 |issn=0022-0515}}

The book's most controversial argument hinged on a hypothesized relationship between race and intelligence, specifically the hypothesis that differences in average IQ test performance between racial groups are at least partially genetic in origin. Subsequent developments in genetics research have led to a scholarly consensus that this hypothesis is false. The idea that there are genetically determined differences in intelligence between racial groups is now considered discredited by mainstream science.{{Cite news |last=Evans |first=Gavin |date=2 March 2018 |title=The unwelcome revival of 'race science' |work=The Guardian |url=https://www.theguardian.com/news/2018/mar/02/the-unwelcome-revival-of-race-science |url-status=live |access-date=May 2, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190220023319/https://www.theguardian.com/news/2018/mar/02/the-unwelcome-revival-of-race-science |archive-date=February 20, 2019}}{{cite web |last1=Turkheimer |first1=Eric |last2=Harden |first2=Kathryn Paige |last3=Nisbett |first3=Richard E. |date=June 15, 2017 |title=There's still no good reason to believe black-white IQ differences are due to genes |url=https://www.vox.com/the-big-idea/2017/6/15/15797120/race-black-white-iq-response-critics |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210504055356/https://www.vox.com/the-big-idea/2017/6/15/15797120/race-black-white-iq-response-critics |archive-date=May 4, 2021 |access-date=29 April 2021 |website=Vox |publisher=Vox Media}}{{Cite journal |last1=Panofsky |first1=Aaron |last2=Dasgupta |first2=Kushan |last3=Iturriaga |first3=Nicole |year=2021 |title=How White nationalists mobilize genetics: From genetic ancestry and human biodiversity to counterscience and metapolitics |journal=American Journal of Physical Anthropology |volume=175 |issue=2 |pages=387–398 |doi=10.1002/ajpa.24150 |pmid=32986847 |pmc=9909835 |quote= |s2cid=222163480}}

Much of the work referenced by The Bell Curve was funded by the Pioneer Fund, which aims to advance the scientific study of heredity and human differences, and which has been accused of promoting white supremacist views, particularly scientific racism.{{cite web |last=Naureckas |first=Jim |date=January 1, 1995 |title=Racism Resurgent |url=https://fair.org/home/racism-resurgent/ |access-date=May 4, 2020 |work=FAIR}}{{cite web |date=November 22, 1994 |title=The Bell Curve and the Pioneer Fund |url=http://www.hartford-hwp.com/archives/45/049.html |access-date=May 4, 2020 |format=transcript from ABC World News Tonight |via=Hartford Web Publishing}}{{cite web |last=Metcalf |first=Stephen |date=October 17, 2005 |title=Moral Courage: Is defending The Bell Curve an example of intellectual honesty? |url=http://www.slate.com/id/2128199/ |access-date=May 4, 2020 |work=Slate}}{{Cite journal |last=Rosenthal |first=Steven J. |date=1995 |title=The Pioneer Fund: Financier of Fascist Research |url=http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0002764295039001006 |journal=American Behavioral Scientist |language=en |volume=39 |issue=1 |pages=44–61 |doi=10.1177/0002764295039001006 |s2cid=144496335 |issn=0002-7642}} Murray criticized the characterization of the Pioneer Fund as a racist organization, arguing that it has as much relationship to its founder as "Henry Ford and today's Ford Foundation".Herrnstein & Murray (1994) p. 564.

=''Coming Apart''=

In his bestseller Coming Apart: The State of White America, 1960–2010 (2012), Murray describes diverging trends between poor and upper middle-class white Americans in the half-century after the death of John F. Kennedy. He focuses on white Americans in order to argue that economic decline in that period was not experienced solely by minorities, whom he brings into his argument in the last few chapters of the book. He argues that class strain has cleaved white Americans into two distinct, highly segregated strata: "an upper class, defined by educational attainment, and a new lower class, characterized by the lack of it. Murray also posits that the new [white] 'lower class' is less industrious, less likely to marry and raise children in a two-parent household, and more politically and socially disengaged."{{cite web|last1=NPR Staff|title=Is White, Working Class America 'Coming Apart'?|url=https://www.npr.org/2012/02/06/146463384/is-white-working-class-america-coming-apartl|website=NPR|access-date=1 October 2019|archive-date=October 1, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191001205625/https://www.npr.org/2012/02/06/146463384/is-white-working-class-america-coming-apartl|url-status=live}}

Critics have suggested that he cherry-picked the data and time period under analysis, with Nell Irvin Painter, for example, writing that "behaviors that seem to have begun in the 1960s belong to a much longer and more complex history than ideologically driven writers like Mr. Murray would have us believe."{{cite news|last1=Painter|first1=Nell Irvin|title=When Poverty Was White|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/25/opinion/sunday/when-poverty-was-white.html|work=The New York Times|date=March 24, 2012|access-date=1 October 2019|archive-date=October 1, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191001205625/https://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/25/opinion/sunday/when-poverty-was-white.html|url-status=live}}

=Op-ed writings=

Murray has written opinion pieces for The New Republic, Commentary, The Public Interest, The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, National Review, and The Washington Post. He has been a witness before United States House and Senate committees and a consultant to senior Republican government officials in the United States and other conservative officials in the United Kingdom, Eastern Europe, and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.{{cite web|date=November 15, 2006|title=National Review Cruise Speakers|url=http://www.nrcruise.com/Pages/speakers.htm|archive-url=https://archive.today/20061115101048/http://www.nrcruise.com/Pages/speakers.htm|archive-date=November 15, 2006}}

In the April 2007 issue of Commentary magazine, Murray wrote on the disproportionate representation of Jews in the ranks of outstanding achievers and says that one of the reasons is that they "have been found to have an unusually high mean intelligence as measured by IQ tests since the first Jewish samples were tested". His article concludes with an assertion: "At this point, I take sanctuary in my remaining hypothesis, uniquely parsimonious and happily irrefutable. The Jews are God's chosen people."{{cite web|title=Jewish Genius|date=April 2007|url=http://www.commentarymagazine.com/article/jewish-genius/|access-date=January 9, 2012|publisher=Commentarymagazine.com|archive-date=September 7, 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150907201601/https://www.commentarymagazine.com/article/jewish-genius/|url-status=live}}

In the July/August 2007 issue of The American, a magazine published by the American Enterprise Institute, Murray says he has changed his mind about SAT tests and says they should be scrapped: "Perhaps the SAT had made an important independent contribution to predicting college performance in earlier years, but by the time research was conducted in the last half of the 1990s, the test had already been ruined by political correctness." Murray advocates replacing the traditional SAT with the College Board's subject achievement tests: "The surprising empirical reality is that the SAT is redundant if students are required to take achievement tests."

Public speech and protest at Middlebury College

File:Charles Murray Midd.jpg

On March 2, 2017, Murray was scheduled to speak at Middlebury College in Middlebury, Vermont, about Coming Apart: the State of White America, 1960–2010. Murray was invited to attend the college by Middlebury's American Enterprise Institute Club, who received co-sponsorship of the event from a professor in the political science department. Before Murray was able to speak, students within the hall rose to their feet and recited in unison a speech about the eugenicist implications of Murray's work. Students proceeded to chant and dance in the hall in an effort to stop Murray from speaking. Bill Burger, Middlebury College's Vice President of Communications, announced that the speech would be moved to another location. A closed circuit broadcast showed Murray being interviewed by political science professor Allison Stanger—chanting from protesters could be heard throughout the broadcast. After the interview, there was a violent confrontation between protesters—both from the college and the surrounding community—and Murray, Vice President for Communications Bill Burger, and Stanger (who was hospitalized with a neck injury and concussion) as they left the McCullough Student Center. Middlebury students said that Middlebury Public Safety officers instigated and escalated violence against nonviolent protesters and that administrator Bill Burger assaulted protesters with a car.{{Cite web |last=keychainmail |date=March 4, 2017 |title=Middlebury Students: College Administrator and Staff Assault Students, Endanger Lives After Murray Protest |url=http://www.middbeat.org/2017/03/04/middlebury-students-college-administrator-and-staff-assault-students-endanger-lives-after-murray-protest/ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170305041134/http://www.middbeat.org/2017/03/04/middlebury-students-college-administrator-and-staff-assault-students-endanger-lives-after-murray-protest/ |archive-date=March 5, 2017 |access-date=March 4, 2017 |website=middbeat |df=mdy-all}} Middlebury President Laurie L. Patton responded after the event, saying the school would respond to "the clear violations of Middlebury College policy that occurred inside and outside Wilson Hall".{{cite web |date=March 3, 2017 |title=Statement from President Laurie L. Patton Regarding Charles Murray Event |url=https://m.middlebury.edu/news/index?feed=middlebury_newsroom_rss&id=545920+at+http%3A%2F%2Fwww.middlebury.edu |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220719031300/https://www.middlebury.edu/?feed=middlebury_newsroom_rss&id=545920+at+http%253A%252F%252Fwww.middlebury.edu |archive-date=July 19, 2022 |access-date=March 4, 2017 |publisher=Middlebury College}}{{cite news |author1=Staff writers |date=March 3, 2017 |title=Middlebury College professor injured by protesters as she escorted controversial speaker |work=Addison County Independent |location=Addison County, Vermont |url=http://www.addisonindependent.com/201703middlebury-college-professor-injured-protesters-she-escorted-controversial-speaker |access-date=4 March 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170303232106/http://www.addisonindependent.com/201703middlebury-college-professor-injured-protesters-she-escorted-controversial-speaker |archive-date=March 3, 2017}}{{Cite news |last=Hallenbeck |first=Brent |date=March 3, 2017 |title=Protesters created 'violent incident' at Middlebury |work=Burlington Free Press |url=http://www.burlingtonfreepress.com/story/news/2017/03/03/protesters-created-violent-incident-middlebury/98711176/ |url-status=live |access-date=March 5, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220719031305/https://www.burlingtonfreepress.com/story/news/2017/03/03/protesters-created-violent-incident-middlebury/98711176/ |archive-date=July 19, 2022}}{{cite web |last=Murray |first=Charles |date=March 6, 2017 |title=Charles Murray: 'Into the middle of a mob' – What happened when I tried to speak at Middlebury |url=https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/charles-murray-into-the-middle-of-a-mob-what-happened-when-i-tried-to-speak-at-middlebury/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170306223343/http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2017/03/06/charles-murray-into-middle-mob-what-happened-when-tried-to-speak-at-middlebury.html |archive-date=March 6, 2017 |access-date=March 6, 2017 |website=FoxNews.com}} The school took disciplinary action against 74 students for their involvement in the incident.{{cite web |date=2017-05-23 |title=Middlebury College Completes Sanctioning Process for March 2 Disruptions |url=http://www.middlebury.edu/newsroom/archive/2017-news/node/547896 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170525231842/http://www.middlebury.edu/newsroom/archive/2017-news/node/547896 |archive-date=May 25, 2017 |access-date=2017-05-25 |publisher=Middlebury College}}{{cite web |last=Reilly |first=Katie |date=May 24, 2017 |title=Middlebury Has Sanctioned Students for Shutting Down Charles Murray's Lecture |url=https://time.com/4792694/middlebury-college-discipline-charles-murray-protest/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170524192418/http://time.com/4792694/middlebury-college-discipline-charles-murray-protest/ |archive-date=May 24, 2017 |access-date=May 24, 2017 |work=Time}}

Political views

{{Conservatism US|intellectuals}}

Murray identifies as a libertarian.{{cite book |last1=Murray |first1=Charles |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=UgB6ST39NnQC |title=What It Means to Be a Libertarian: A Personal Interpretation |date=2010 |publisher=Crown/Archetype |isbn=978-0307764928 |access-date=April 10, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220719031258/https://books.google.com/books?id=UgB6ST39NnQC |archive-date=July 19, 2022 |url-status=live}} He has also been described as conservative,{{cite magazine |title=Conservative Writer Charles Murray Speaks Out Against Middlebury Students Who Shut Down Talk |url=https://time.com/4690735/charles-murray-middlebury-protest/ |url-status=live |magazine=Time |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180115133757/http://time.com/4690735/charles-murray-middlebury-protest/ |archive-date=January 15, 2018 |access-date=April 10, 2018}}{{cite news |last=Confessore |first=Nicholas |date=10 February 2012 |title=Tramps Like Them |work=The New York Times |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/12/books/review/charles-murray-examines-the-white-working-class-in-coming-apart.html |url-status=live |access-date=April 10, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180411111417/https://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/12/books/review/charles-murray-examines-the-white-working-class-in-coming-apart.html |archive-date=April 11, 2018}}{{cite news |title=What makes Charles Murray a lightning rod? |work=BostonGlobe.com |url=https://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2017/09/04/what-makes-charles-murray-lightning-rod/SSG8VE6EGMiIOAiTufI54N/story.html |url-status=live |access-date=April 10, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180411025853/https://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2017/09/04/what-makes-charles-murray-lightning-rod/SSG8VE6EGMiIOAiTufI54N/story.html |archive-date=April 11, 2018}}{{cite news |last1=Holley |first1=Peter |date=4 March 2017 |title=A conservative author tried to speak at a liberal arts college. He left fleeing an angry mob. |newspaper=The Washington Post |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/grade-point/wp/2017/03/04/a-conservative-author-tried-to-speak-at-a-liberal-college-he-left-fleeing-an-angry-mob/ |url-status=live |access-date=April 10, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180424205022/https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/grade-point/wp/2017/03/04/a-conservative-author-tried-to-speak-at-a-liberal-college-he-left-fleeing-an-angry-mob/ |archive-date=April 24, 2018}} and far-right.{{cite journal |last1=Robinson |first1=Nathan J. |date=July 17, 2017 |title=Why Is Charles Murray Odious? |url=https://www.currentaffairs.org/news/2017/07/why-is-charles-murray-odious |url-status=live |journal=Current Affairs |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181003062158/https://www.currentaffairs.org/2017/07/why-is-charles-murray-odious |archive-date=October 3, 2018 |access-date=October 3, 2018}}{{cite news |last=Borchers |first=Callum |date=March 6, 2017 |title=Analysis – Forget Milo Yiannopoulos. Charles Murray is the free-speech martyr to pay attention to |newspaper=The Washington Post |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2017/03/06/forget-milo-yiannopoulos-charles-murray-is-the-free-speech-martyr-to-pay-attention-to/ |url-status=live |access-date=October 3, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181010005343/https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2017/03/06/forget-milo-yiannopoulos-charles-murray-is-the-free-speech-martyr-to-pay-attention-to/ |archive-date=October 10, 2018}}{{cite magazine |last=Lane |first=Charles |date= |title=The Tainted Sources of 'The Bell Curve' |magazine=The New York Review |url=http://www.nybooks.com/articles/1994/12/01/the-tainted-sources-of-the-bell-curve/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181003101545/https://www.nybooks.com/articles/1994/12/01/the-tainted-sources-of-the-bell-curve/ |archive-date=October 3, 2018 |access-date=October 3, 2018}}

= Education =

Murray has been critical of the No Child Left Behind law, arguing that it "set a goal that was devoid of any contact with reality.... The United States Congress, acting with large bipartisan majorities, at the urging of the President, enacted as the law of the land that all children are to be above average." He sees the law as an example of "Educational romanticism [which] asks too much from students at the bottom of the intellectual pile, asks the wrong things from those in the middle, and asks too little from those at the top."{{cite web |last=Murray |first=Charles |url=http://www.aei.org/article/27962 |title=Articles & Commentary: The Age of Educational Romanticism |publisher=Aei.org |date=May 1, 2008 |access-date=January 11, 2011 |archive-date=January 7, 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110107212857/http://www.aei.org/article/27962 |url-status=live }}

Challenging "educational romanticism", he wrote Real Education: Four Simple Truths for Bringing America's Schools Back to Reality, making the argument for "four simple truths", namely: ability varies, half of all children are below average, too many people are going to college, and that America's future depends on how we educate the academically gifted.{{cite web|last=Murray |first=Charles |url=http://www.aei.org/book/958 |title=Real Education |publisher=AEI |date=August 19, 2008 |access-date=January 11, 2011|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110107212010/http://www.aei.org/book/958 |archive-date=January 7, 2011 }}

In 2014, a speech that Murray was scheduled to give at Azusa Pacific University was "postponed" due to Murray's research on human group differences.{{cite web|title=Charles Murray Questions Azusa Pacific|url=https://www.insidehighered.com/quicktakes/2014/04/23/charles-murray-questions-azusa-pacific|website=Inside Higher Ed|date=April 23, 2014 |access-date=October 17, 2014|archive-date=June 19, 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150619113819/https://www.insidehighered.com/quicktakes/2014/04/23/charles-murray-questions-azusa-pacific|url-status=live}} Murray responded to the institution by claiming that it was a disservice to the students and faculty to dismiss his research because of its controversial nature rather than the evidence. Murray also urged the university to consider his works as they are and reach conclusions for themselves, rather than relying on sources that "specialize in libeling people".{{cite web|last1=Murray|first1=Charles|title=Charles Murray: An open letter to the students of Azusa Pacific University|url=http://www.aei-ideas.org/2014/04/charles-murray-an-open-letter-to-the-students-of-azusa-pacific-university/|website=AEI Ideas|publisher=American Enterprise Institute|access-date=October 17, 2014|archive-date=October 27, 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141027110753/http://www.aei-ideas.org/2014/04/charles-murray-an-open-letter-to-the-students-of-azusa-pacific-university/}}

= Economics =

Murray has indicated that he believes that the government is over regulated and has expressed support for disobeying regulations he considers to be unjust.{{Cite news |last=Murray |first=Charles |title=Regulation Run Amok—And How to Fight Back |url=http://www.wsj.com/articles/regulation-run-amokand-how-to-fight-back-1431099256 |access-date=2022-12-25 |newspaper=Wall Street Journal |date=May 8, 2015 |language=en-US}}

Murray supports having simpler tax codes and decreasing government benefits, which could incentivize childbearing. In June 2016, Murray wrote that replacing welfare with a universal basic income (UBI) was the best way to adapt to "a radically changing U.S. jobs market"{{cite web |date=June 3, 2016 |title=A guaranteed income for every American |url=https://www.aei.org/articles/a-guaranteed-income-for-every-american/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201101023127/https://www.aei.org/articles/a-guaranteed-income-for-every-american/ |archive-date=November 1, 2020 |access-date=January 25, 2021}} and defended that, as of 2014, the annual cost of a UBI in the US would have been about $200 billion cheaper than the current system.{{Cite web |date=2020-06-04 |title=Is a Universal Basic Income Program Worth the Costs?, by Veronique de Rugy |url=https://www.creators.com/read/veronique-de-rugy/06/20/is-a-universal-basic-income-program-worth-the-costs |access-date=2024-02-11 |website=www.creators.com |language=en}}{{Cite web |last=de Rugy |first=Veronique |date=7 June 2016 |title=Universal Basic Income's Growing Appeal |url=https://www.mercatus.org/economic-insights/expert-commentary/universal-basic-incomes-growing-appeal |access-date=3 April 2023 |website=Mercatus Center}}

= Abortion =

During an appearance at CPAC, Murray said of abortions: "It's a murder—it's a homicide—but sometimes homicide is justified".{{Cite web |title=Reproductive Rights Prof Blog |url=https://lawprofessors.typepad.com/reproductive_rights/2013/03/charles-murray-elaborates-on-statement-that-abortion-is-justifiable-homicide.html |access-date=2022-12-28 |website=lawprofessors.typepad.com}} He has said that he believes that it is acceptable in certain situations including when a woman's life is at risk and when there is severe damage to the brain of the child.{{Cite web |last=fad-admin |date=2016-01-19 |title=Murray and Marriage |url=https://isi.org/intercollegiate-review/murray-and-marriage/ |access-date=2022-12-28 |website=Intercollegiate Studies Institute |language=en-US}} Murray has also indicated that he thinks that conservatives should put social issues like abortion on the back burner and has said they should seek a "moral suasion" rather than criminalization of issues like abortion and same-sex marriage.

= Race =

In Murray book The Bell Curve in chapters 13 and 14, where the authors wrote about the enduring differences in race and intelligence and discuss implications of that difference. They write in the introduction to chapter 13 that "The debate about whether and how much genes and environment have to do with ethnic differences remains unresolved,"{{cite book |last1=Murray |first1=Charles |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=s4CKqxi6yWIC&q=genes%20environment&pg=PA270 |title=The Bell Curve: Intelligence and Class Structure in American Life |last2=Herrnstein |first2=Richard J. |date=2010 |publisher=Simon and Schuster |isbn=978-1439134917 |page=270 |access-date=14 February 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220719031258/https://books.google.com/books?id=s4CKqxi6yWIC&q=genes+environment&pg=PA270 |archive-date=July 19, 2022 |url-status=live}} and that "It seems highly likely to us that both genes and the environment have something to do with racial differences."Murray and Herrnstein 2010, p. 311. This stands in contrast to the contemporary and subsequent consensus of mainstream researchers, who do not find that racial disparities in educational attainment or measured intelligence are explained by between-group genetic differences.{{Cite book |last=Mackintosh, N. J. |title=IQ and human intelligence |date=2011 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-958559-5 |edition=2nd |location=Oxford |oclc=669754008}}{{Cite journal |last1=Nisbett |first1=Richard E. |last2=Aronson |first2=Joshua |last3=Blair |first3=Clancy |last4=Dickens |first4=William |last5=Flynn |first5=James |last6=Halpern |first6=Diane F. |last7=Turkheimer |first7=Eric |date=2012 |title=Intelligence: New findings and theoretical developments. |journal=American Psychologist |language=en |volume=67 |issue=2 |pages=130–159 |doi=10.1037/a0026699 |issn=1935-990X |pmid=22233090}}{{Cite journal |last=Kaplan |first=Jonathan Michael |date=January 2015 |title=Race, IQ, and the search for statistical signals associated with so-called "X"-factors: environments, racism, and the "hereditarian hypothesis" |journal=Biology & Philosophy |language=en |volume=30 |issue=1 |pages=1–17 |doi=10.1007/s10539-014-9428-0 |issn=0169-3867 |s2cid=85351431}}{{cite book |last1=Horn |first1=John L. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=p0rauwDclu8C |title=Race and intelligence: separating science from myth |date=2013 |publisher=Lawrence Erlbaum Associates |isbn=9781135651787 |editor1-last=Fish |editor1-first=Jefferson M. |editor1-link=Jefferson Fish |pages=297–325 |chapter=Selections of Evidence, Misleading Assumptions, and Oversimplifications: The Political Message of the Bell Curve |access-date=4 July 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191220060224/https://books.google.com/books?id=p0rauwDclu8C |archive-date=December 20, 2019 |url-status=live}}{{cite book |last1=Cravens |first1=Hamilton |title=Race and science: scientific challenges to racism in modern America |publisher=Oregon State University Press |year=2009 |isbn=9780870715761 |editor1-last=Farber |editor1-first=Paul Lawrence |editor1-link=Paul Lawrence Farber |page=177 |chapter=Race, IQ, and Politics in Twentieth-Century America |editor2-last=Cravens |editor2-first=Hamilton}}{{cite book |last1=Richards |first1=Graham |title=Defining difference: race and racism in the history of psychology |date=January 2004 |publisher=American Psychological Association |isbn=9781591470274 |editor1-last=Winston |editor1-first=Andrew S. |editor1-link=Andrew Winston |edition=1st |page=143}}"Genetic Differences and School Readiness" William T. Dickens, 2005"Race, IQ, and Jensen" James R. Flynn (London: Routledge, 1980)Nisbett, Richard. "Race, Genetics, and IQ", in The Black-White Test Score Gap, edited by Christopher Jencks and Meredith Phillips (Brookings, 1998), pp. 86–102.

Citing assertions made by Murray in The Bell Curve, The Southern Poverty Law Center charged that his ideas were rooted in eugenics. Murray disputed this.{{cite web |author=Charles Murray |date=24 March 2017 |title=Charles Murray's SPLC page as edited by Charles Murray |url=https://www.aei.org/publication/charles-murrays-splc-page-as-edited-by-charles-murray |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170331013803/http://www.aei.org/publication/charles-murrays-splc-page-as-edited-by-charles-murray/ |archive-date=March 31, 2017 |access-date=12 April 2017 |publisher=American Enterprise Institute}} Francis Wheen summarized Murray's arguments as "Black people are more stupid than white people: always have been, always will be. This is why they have less economic and social success. Since the fault lies in their genes, they are doomed to be at the bottom of the heap now and forever."{{cite news |last=Wheen |first=Francie |date=10 May 2000 |title=The 'science' behind racism {{!}} Columnists {{!}} guardian.co.uk |work=The Guardian |url=https://www.theguardian.com/Columnists/Column/0,,219249,00.html |url-status=live |access-date=27 August 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201101003043/https://www.theguardian.com/Columnists/Column/0,,219249,00.html |archive-date=November 1, 2020}} Other intellectuals have defended Murray against allegations of racism, including Sam Harris,{{Cite web |last=Loury |first=Glenn |title=In Defense of Charles Murray |url=https://glennloury.substack.com/p/in-defense-of-charles-murray |access-date=2022-11-27 |website=glennloury.substack.com |date=March 29, 2022 |language=en}} Glenn Loury, Andrew Sullivan,{{Cite web |last=Sullivan |first=Andrew |date=2018-03-30 |title=Denying Genetics Isn't Shutting Down Racism, It's Fueling It |url=https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2018/03/denying-genetics-isnt-shutting-down-racism-its-fueling-it.html |access-date=2022-11-27 |website=Intelligencer |language=en-us}} James Flynn,{{Cite news |last=Risen |first=Clay |date=2021-01-25 |title=James R. Flynn, Who Found We Are Getting Smarter, Dies at 86 |language=en-US |work=The New York Times |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/25/science/james-r-flynn-dead.html |access-date=2023-03-14 |issn=0362-4331}} and Kyle Smith.{{Cite web |date=2018-04-20 |title=Ezra Klein's Intellectual Demagoguery |url=https://www.nationalreview.com/2018/04/ezra-klein-vox-accuses-sam-harris-of-racism/ |access-date=2022-11-27 |website=National Review |language=en-US}}

Selected bibliography

In addition to these books, Murray has published articles in Commentary magazine, The New Criterion, The Weekly Standard, The Washington Post, The Wall Street Journal, and The New York Times.

See also

References

{{reflist}}

Further reading

  • {{cite web

|url=http://vnweb.hwwilsonweb.com/hww/jumpstart.jhtml?recid=0bc05f7a67b1790e7b0cdce9f16d9f196e968a97071066b2835e6eca601a9b81dbbb81569bfe5c6b23796397e93ed18d&fmt=C |title=Biography of Murray, Charles A. |access-date=August 25, 2008 |year=1986 |format=fee |work=Current Biography |publisher=H. W. Wilson }}

  • {{cite encyclopedia |last=Doherty |first= Brian |author-link= Brian Doherty (journalist) |editor-first=Ronald |editor-last=Hamowy |editor-link=Ronald Hamowy |encyclopedia=The Encyclopedia of Libertarianism |title= Murray, Charles (1943–) |url= https://books.google.com/books?id=yxNgXs3TkJYC |year=2008 |publisher= Sage; Cato Institute |location= Thousand Oaks, CA |doi=10.4135/9781412965811.n211|isbn= 978-1412965804 |oclc=750831024| lccn = 2008009151 |pages=344–345 }}