Comparison of free and open-source software licenses#Approvals

{{short description|none}}

This comparison only covers software licenses which have a linked Wikipedia article for details and which are approved by at least one of the following expert groups: the Free Software Foundation, the Open Source Initiative, the Debian Project and the Fedora Project. For a list of licenses not specifically intended for software, see List of free-content licences.

FOSS licenses

FOSS stands for "Free and Open Source Software". There is no one universally agreed-upon definition of FOSS software and various groups maintain approved lists of licenses. The Open Source Initiative (OSI) is one such organization keeping a list of open-source licenses.[http://opensource.org/licenses/alphabetical Open source licenses - Licenses by Name] on opensource.org The Free Software Foundation (FSF) maintains a list of what it considers free.{{cite web |title=Various Licenses and Comments about Them| url=https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html | access-date=August 8, 2011|website=Free Software Foundation}} FSF's free software and OSI's open-source licenses together are called FOSS licenses. There are licenses accepted by the OSI which are not free as per the Free Software Definition. The Open Source Definition allows for further restrictions like price, type of contribution and origin of the contribution, e.g. the case of the NASA Open Source Agreement, which requires the code to be "original" work.{{cite web|url=https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.en.html#NASA|title=Various Licenses and Comments about Them: NASA Open Source Agreement|website=Free Software Foundation}}{{cite web|url=https://opensource.org/licenses/alphabetical|website=Open Source Initiative|title=Licenses by Name|date=16 September 2022 }} The OSI does not endorse FSF license analysis (interpretation) as per their disclaimer.{{cite web|url=https://opensource.org/node/778|title=Other Resources & Disclaimer|website=Open Source Initiative|quote=While the OSI acknowledges these as potentially helpful resources for the community, it does not endorse any content, contributors or license interpretations from these websites.[...]The OSI does not promote or exclusively favor any of the above resources, but instead mentions them as a neutral, separate third-party.}}

The FSF's Free Software Definition focuses on the user's unrestricted rights to use a program, to study and modify it, to copy it, and to redistribute it for any purpose, which are considered by the FSF the four essential freedoms.[https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-software-for-freedom.html "Relationship between the Free Software movement and Open Source movement"], Free Software Foundation, Inc[https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html "What is Free Software"], Free Software Foundation, Inc The OSI's open-source criteria focuses on the availability of the source code and the advantages of an unrestricted and community driven development model.[https://opensource.org/about opensource.org/about] "Open source is a development method for software that harnesses the power of distributed peer review and transparency of process. The promise of open source is better quality, higher reliability, more flexibility, lower cost, and an end to predatory vendor lock-in." Yet, many FOSS licenses, like the Apache License, and all Free Software licenses allow commercial use of FOSS components.{{cite book | first = Dr. Karl Michael | last = Popp | title = Best Practices for commercial use of open source software | year = 2015 | publisher = Books on Demand | location = Norderstedt, Germany | isbn = 978-3738619096}}

General comparison

{{Confusing|reason=values used in the below table are not defined and some are ambiguous|talk=Talk:Comparison of free and open-source software licences#General comparison confusing|date=May 2020}}

For a simpler comparison across the most common licenses see free-software license comparison.

The following table compares various features of each license and is a general guide to the terms and conditions of each license, based on seven subjects or categories. Recent tools like the European Commissions' Joinup Licensing Assistant,{{cite web|url=https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/solution/joinup-licensing-assistant/joinup-licensing-assistant-jla|title=Joinup Licensing Assistant|access-date=31 March 2020}} makes possible the licenses selection and comparison based on more than 40 subjects or categories, with access to their SPDX identifier and full text. The table below lists the permissions and limitations regarding the following subjects:

  • Linking - linking of the licensed code with code licensed under a different license (e.g. when the code is provided as a library)
  • Distribution - distribution of the code to third parties
  • Modification - modification of the code by a licensee
  • Patent grant - protection of licensees from patent claims made by code contributors regarding their contribution, and protection of contributors from patent claims made by licensees
  • Private use - whether modification to the code must be shared with the community or may be used privately (e.g. internal use by a corporation)
  • Sublicensing - whether modified code may be licensed under a different license (for example a copyright) or must retain the same license under which it was provided
  • TM grant - use of trademarks associated with the licensed code or its contributors by a licensee

In this table, "permissive" means the software has minimal restrictions on how it can be used, modified, and redistributed, usually including a warranty disclaimer. "Copyleft" means the software requires that its source code be made publicly available and that all provisions in the license be preserved in derivative works.

{{sort-under}}

{{sticky header}}

class="wikitable sortable sort-under sticky-header" style="text-align: center;"
License

!Author

!Latest version

!Publication date

!Linking

!Distribution

!Modification

!Patent grant

!Private use

!Sublicensing

!TM grant

Academic Free License{{cite web|url=http://rosenlaw.com/OSL3.0-explained.htm|title=OSL 3.0 Explained}}Lawrence E. Rosen3.02002{{yes|Permissive}}{{yes|Permissive}}{{yes|Permissive}}{{yes}}{{yes}}{{yes|Permissive}}{{no}}
Affero General Public LicenseAffero Inc2.02007{{free|Copylefted}}{{cite web|url=http://www.affero.org/oagpl.html|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191123101252/http://www.affero.org:80/oagpl.html|archive-date=November 23, 2019|title=affero.org: Affero General Public License version 1 (AGPLv1)}}{{free|Copyleft except for the GNU AGPL}}{{cite web|url=http://www.affero.org/agpl2.html|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191123102313/http://www.affero.org:80/agpl2.html|archive-date=November 23, 2019|title=affero.org: Affero General Public License version 2 (AGPLv2)}}{{free|Copyleft}}{{dunno}}{{yes}}{{dunno}}{{dunno}}
Apache LicenseApache Software Foundation2.02004{{yes|Permissive}}{{cite web|url=https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html#redistribution|title=the section 4 of the apache license version 2}}{{yes|Permissive}}{{yes|Permissive}}{{yes}}{{yes}}{{yes|Permissive}}{{no}}
Apple Public Source LicenseApple Computer2.02003-08-06August 6, 2003{{yes|Permissive}}{{dunno}}{{partial|Limited}}{{dunno}}{{dunno}}{{dunno}}{{dunno}}
Artistic LicenseLarry Wall2.02000{{partial|With restrictions}}{{partial|With restrictions}}{{partial|With restrictions}}{{no}}{{yes|Permissive}}{{partial|With restrictions}}{{no}}
BeerwarePoul-Henning Kamp421998{{Efn|See footnote of the Beerware article}}{{yes|Permissive}}{{yes|Permissive}}{{yes|Permissive}}{{no}}{{yes|Permissive}}{{yes|Permissive}}{{no}}
BSD LicenseRegents of the University of California3.0{{dunno}}{{yes|Permissive}}{{cite web|url=http://opensource.org/licenses/BSD-3-Clause|title=BSD license|date=22 May 2011 }}{{yes|Permissive}}{{yes|Permissive}}{{no|Manually}}{{yes}}{{yes|Permissive}}{{No|Manually}}
Boost Software LicenseDevin Smith{{cite web |url=https://www.boost.org/users/license.html |title=Boost Software License |date=December 3, 2003 |publisher=Boost (C++ libraries) |access-date=April 21, 2025 |archive-date=April 24, 2025 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20250424015917/https://www.boost.org/users/license.html |url-status=dead }}1.02003-08-17August 17, 2003{{yes|Permissive}}{{yes|Permissive}}{{yes|Permissive}}{{no}}{{yes|Permissive}}{{partial|With restrictions}}{{no}}
Creative Commons ZeroCreative Commons1.02009{{yes|Public Domain}}{{cite web |url=https://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/27081 |title=Using CC0 for public domain software |date=April 15, 2011 |publisher=Creative Commons |access-date=May 10, 2011 |archive-date=May 14, 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110514163106/https://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/27081 |url-status=dead }}{{cite web |url=https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html |title=Various Licenses and Comments about Them |publisher=GNU Project |access-date=April 4, 2015}}{{yes|Public Domain}}{{yes|Public Domain}}{{no}}{{yes|Public Domain}}{{yes|Public Domain}}{{no}}
CC BYCreative Commons4.02002{{yes|Permissive}}[https://www.fsf.org/blogs/licensing/cc-by-4-0-and-cc-by-sa-4-0-added-to-our-list-of-free-licenses cc-by-4-0-and-cc-by-sa-4-0-added-to-our-list-of-free-licenses] (2015){{yes|Permissive}}{{yes|Permissive}}{{no}}{{yes}}{{yes|Permissive}}{{no}}
CC BY-SACreative Commons4.02002{{free|Copylefted}}{{free|Copylefted}}{{free|Copylefted}}{{no}}{{yes}}{{free|Copylefted}}{{cite web |url=https://creativecommons.org/share-your-work/licensing-considerations/compatible-licenses/ |title=Compatible Licenses |publisher=Creative Commons}}{{no}}
CeCILLCEA / CNRS / INRIA2.12013-06-21June 21, 2013{{yes|Permissive}}{{yes|Permissive}}{{yes|Permissive}}{{no}}{{yes|Permissive}}{{partial|With restrictions}}{{no}}
Common Development and Distribution LicenseSun Microsystems1.02004-12December 1, 2004{{yes|Permissive}}{{dunno}}{{partial|Limited}}{{dunno}}{{dunno}}{{dunno}}{{dunno}}
Common Public LicenseIBM1.02001-05May 2001{{yes|Permissive}}{{dunno}}{{free|Copylefted}}{{dunno}}{{dunno}}{{dunno}}{{dunno}}
Cryptix General LicenseCryptix Foundation{{n/a}}1995{{yes|Permissive}}{{yes|Permissive}}{{yes|Permissive}}{{no|Manually}}{{yes}}{{dunno}}{{No|Manually}}
Eclipse Public LicenseEclipse Foundation2.02017-08-24August 24, 2017{{yes|Permissive}}{{cite web|url=https://www.eclipse.org/legal/epl-2.0/|title=Eclipse Public License - v 2.0}}{{free|Copylefted}}{{cite web|url=https://www.capitalone.com/tech/open-source/open-source-licenses-explained/|title=How to Use Popular Open Source Licenses, Explained}}{{free|Copylefted}}{{yes}}{{yes}}{{free|Copylefted}}{{no}}
Educational Community LicenseIndiana University{{cite web|url=https://scholarworks.iu.edu/dspace/handle/2022/3076|title=Open Source Collaboration in Higher Education: Guidelines and Report of the Licensing and Policy Framework Summit for Software Sharing in Higher Education|first1=Daniel|last1=Greenstein|first2=Brad|last2=Wheeler|date=1 March 2007|via=scholarworks.iu.edu}}1.02007{{yes|Permissive}}{{dunno}}{{yes|Permissive}}{{dunno}}{{dunno}}{{dunno}}{{dunno}}
European Union Public LicenceEuropean Commission1.22017-05May 2017{{yes|Permissive, according to EU law (Recitals 10 & 15 Directive 2009/24/EC)}}{{free|Copylefted, with an explicit compatibility list}}{{cite web|url=https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/collection/eupl/eupl-compatible-open-source-licences|title=EUPL compatible open source licences}}{{free|Copylefted, with an explicit compatibility list}}{{yes}}{{cite web|url=https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/collection/eupl/eupl-text-11-12|title=EUPL text (1.1 & 1.2)}}{{yes}}{{free|Copylefted, with an explicit compatibility list}}{{no}}
FreeBSDThe FreeBSD project{{n/a}}1999-04April 1999{{yes|Permissive}}{{cite web|url=https://www.freebsd.org/copyright/freebsd-license.html|title=FreeBSD license}}{{yes|Permissive}}{{yes|Permissive}}{{no|Manually}}{{yes|Permissive}}{{yes|Permissive}}{{no|Manually}}
GNU Affero General Public LicenseFree Software Foundation3.02007{{free|GNU GPLv3 only}}https://www.gnu.org/licenses/agpl.html : section 13 of the GNU AGPLv3 license{{free|Copylefted}}https://www.gnu.org/copyleft/gpl-howto.html : GNU licenses copyleft{{free|Copylefted}}{{yes}}{{cite web|url=https://www.gnu.org/licenses/agpl-3.0.html|title=the GNU Affero General Public License version 3}}{{partial|Network usage is not considered private use}}{{free|Copylefted}}{{yes}}
GNU General Public LicenseFree Software Foundation3.02007-06June 2007{{free|GPLv3 compatible only}}https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#IfLibraryIsGPL : If library is under GPLv3https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#LinkingWithGPL : Linking with the GNU GPLv3{{free|Copylefted}}{{free|Copylefted}}{{yes}}{{cite web|url=https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html|title=the GNU General Public License version 3}}{{yes}}{{free|Copylefted}}{{yes}}
GNU Lesser General Public LicenseFree Software Foundation3.02007-06June 2007{{free|With restrictions}}https://www.gnu.org/licenses/lgpl.html : the section 4 of the GNU Lesser General Public License version 3{{free|Copylefted}}{{free|Copylefted}}{{yes}}{{cite web|url=https://www.gnu.org/licenses/lgpl.html|title=the GNU Lesser General Public License version 3}}{{yes}}{{free|Copylefted}}{{yes}}
IBM Public LicenseIBM1.01999-08August 1999{{free|Copylefted}}{{dunno}}{{free|Copylefted}}{{dunno}}{{dunno}}{{dunno}}{{dunno}}
ISC licenseInternet Systems Consortium{{n/a}}2003-06June 2003{{yes|Permissive}}{{yes|Permissive}}{{yes|Permissive}}{{no|Manually}}{{yes|Permissive}}{{yes|Permissive}}{{no|Manually}}
LaTeX Project Public LicenseLaTeX project1.3c{{dunno}}{{yes|Permissive}}{{dunno}}{{yes|Permissive}}{{dunno}}{{dunno}}{{dunno}}{{dunno}}
Microsoft Public LicenseMicrosoft{{n/a}}{{dunno}}{{free|Copylefted}}{{free|Copylefted}}{{free|Copylefted}}{{no}}{{yes|Permissive}}{{dunno}}{{no}}
MIT license / X11 licenseMIT{{n/a}}1988{{yes|Permissive}}{{cite web|url=http://opensource.org/licenses/MIT|title=MIT License|date=31 October 2006 }}{{yes|Permissive}}{{yes|Permissive}}{{no|Manually}}{{yes}}{{yes|Permissive}}{{no|Manually}}
Mozilla Public LicenseMozilla Foundation2.02012-03January 3, 2012{{yes|Permissive}}{{cite web|url=https://www.mozilla.org/MPL/2.0|title=MPL version 2}}{{free|Copylefted}}{{free|Copylefted}}{{yes}}{{yes}}{{free|Copylefted}}{{no}}
Netscape Public LicenseNetscape1.1{{dunno}}{{partial|Limited}}{{dunno}}{{partial|Limited}}{{dunno}}{{dunno}}{{dunno}}{{dunno}}
Open Software LicenseLawrence Rosen3.02005{{yes|Permissive}}{{free|Copylefted}}{{free|Copylefted}}{{yes}}{{yes}}{{free|Copylefted}}{{dunno}}
OpenSSL licenseOpenSSL Project{{n/a}}{{dunno}}{{yes|Permissive}}{{dunno}}{{yes|Permissive}}{{dunno}}{{dunno}}{{dunno}}{{dunno}}
PHP License{{cite web|url=https://www.php.net/license/3_01.txt|title=PHP License 3.01}}PHP Group3.012019{{partial|With restrictions}}{{partial|With restrictions}}{{partial|With restrictions}}{{Yes}}{{Yes}}{{partial|With restrictions}}{{no|Manually}}
Python Software Foundation LicensePython Software Foundation3.9.12020-10-05May 10, 2020{{yes|Permissive}}{{yes|Permissive}}{{yes|Permissive}}{{yes}}{{yes|Permissive}}{{yes|Permissive}}{{no}}
Q Public LicenseTrolltech{{dunno}}{{dunno}}{{partial|Limited}}{{dunno}}{{partial|Limited}}{{dunno}}{{dunno}}{{dunno}}{{dunno}}
Sleepycat LicenseSleepycat Software{{n/a}}1996{{yes|Permissive}}{{partial|With restrictions}}{{yes|Permissive}}{{no}}{{yes}}{{no}}{{no}}
Unlicenseunlicense.org12010-12December 2010{{yes|Permissive/Public domain}}{{yes|Permissive/Public domain}}{{yes|Permissive/Public domain}}{{dunno}}{{yes|Permissive/Public domain}}{{yes|Permissive/Public domain}}{{dunno}}
W3C Software Notice and LicenseW3C200212312002-12-31December 31, 2002{{yes|Permissive}}{{dunno}}{{yes|Permissive}}{{dunno}}{{dunno}}{{dunno}}{{dunno}}
Do What The Fuck You Want To Public License (WTFPL)Banlu Kemiyatorn, Sam Hocevar22004-12December 2004{{yes|Permissive/Public domain}}{{yes|Permissive/Public domain}}{{yes|Permissive/Public domain}}{{no}}{{yes}}{{yes}}{{no}}
XCore Open Source License
also separate "Hardware License Agreement"
XMOS{{dunno}}2011-02February 2011{{yes|Permissive}}{{yes|Permissive}}{{yes|Permissive}}{{no|Manually}}{{yes}}{{yes|Permissive}}{{dunno}}
XFree86 1.1 LicenseThe XFree86 Project, Inc{{dunno}}{{dunno}}{{yes|Permissive}}{{dunno}}{{yes|Permissive}}{{dunno}}{{dunno}}{{dunno}}{{dunno}}
zlib/libpng licenseJean-Loup Gailly and Mark Adler{{n/a}}1995-04-15April 15, 1995{{yes|Permissive}}{{yes|Permissive}}{{yes|Permissive}}{{no|Manually}}{{yes}}{{yes|Permissive}}{{no|Manually}}

Other licenses that don't have information:

class="wikitable sortable sort-under" style="text-align: center;"
license

!Author

!Latest version

!Publication date

Eiffel Forum LicenseNICE22002
Intel Open Source LicenseIntel Corporation{{n/a}}{{dunno}}
RealNetworks Public Source LicenseRealNetworks{{dunno}}{{dunno}}
Reciprocal Public LicenseScott Shattuck1.52007
Sun Industry Standards Source LicenseSun Microsystems{{dunno}}{{dunno}}
Sun Public LicenseSun Microsystems{{dunno}}{{dunno}}
Sybase Open Watcom Public LicenseOpen Watcom{{n/a}}2003-01-28
Zope Public LicenseZope Foundation2.1{{dunno}}
Server Side Public LicenseMongoDB1.02018-10-16

Approvals

This table lists for each license what organizations from the FOSS community have approved it{{spaced ndash}}be it as a "free software" or as an "open source" license{{spaced ndash}}, how those organizations categorize it, and the license compatibility between them for a combined or mixed derivative work. Organizations usually approve specific versions of software licenses. For instance, a FSF approval means that the Free Software Foundation (FSF) considers a license to be free-software license. The FSF recommends at least "Compatible with GPL" and preferably copyleft. The OSI recommends a mix of permissive and copyleft licenses, the Apache License 2.0, 2- & 3-clause BSD license, GPL, LGPL, MIT license, MPL 2.0, CDDL and EPL.

{{sticky header}}

class="wikitable sortable sort-under sticky-header" style="text-align: center; width:99%"
License and version

!FSF approval
{{cite web|url=https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html|title=Various Licenses and Comments about Them |author=Free Software Foundation|work=Licenses|publisher=Free Software Foundation}}

!GPL (v3) compatibility
{{cite web|url=https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#Introduction|title=To be GPL-Compatible has to be compatible with Licenses GNU GPLv3 and GNU GPLv2 – Free Software Foundation |author=Free Software Foundation|work=Software Licenses|publisher=Free Software Foundation}}{{cite web|url=https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#GPLCompatibleLicenses|title=GPL-Compatible Free Software Licenses – Free Software Foundation|author=Free Software Foundation|work=Software Licenses|publisher=Free Software Foundation}}{{cite web|url=https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#GPLIncompatibleLicenses|title=GPL-Incompatible Free Software Licenses – Free Software Foundation|author=Free Software Foundation|work=Software Licenses|publisher=Free Software Foundation}}{{cite web|url=http://gplv3.fsf.org/wiki/index.php/FAQ_Update#What_does_it_mean_to_say_a_license_is_.22compatible_with_the_GPL.22.3F|title=GPL-compatible Definition by FSF – Free Software Foundation|author=Free Software Foundation|work=GPL-compatible Definition|publisher=Free Software Foundation}}{{cite web|url=https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#WhatDoesCompatMean|title=GPL-compatible Definition previous version by FSF – Free Software Foundation|author=Free Software Foundation|work=GPL-compatible Definition|publisher=Free Software Foundation}}

!OSI approval
{{cite web|url=http://www.opensource.org/licenses/|title=The Approved Licenses|author=Open Source Initiative|work=License Information|date=16 September 2022 |publisher=Open Source Initiative}}

!Debian approval
{{cite web|url=http://www.debian.org/legal/licenses/|title=Debian – License information|author=Debian|work=Licenses|publisher=Debian}}{{cite web|url=http://wiki.debian.org/DFSGLicenses|title=The DFSG and Software Licenses|publisher=Debian wiki}}

!Fedora approval
{{cite web|url=http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing|title=Licensing – FedoraProject|author=Fedora|work=Licenses|publisher=Fedora Project}}

Academic Free License{{yes}}{{no}}{{yes}}{{no}}{{yes}}
Apache License 1.x{{yes}}{{no}}{{yes}}{{yes}}{{yes}}
Apache License 2.0{{yes}}{{partial|GPLv3 only}}{{cite web|url=https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/license-list.html#apache2|title=Apache License, Version 2.0|author=Free Software Foundation|work=Licenses|publisher=Free Software Foundation}}{{yes}}{{yes}}{{yes}}
Apple Public Source License 1.x{{No}}{{cite web |url=https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#apsl1 |title=Apple Public Source License (APSL), version 1.x |access-date=2013-08-07}}{{no}}{{yes}}{{no}}{{no}}
Apple Public Source License 2.0{{yes}}{{no}}{{yes}}{{no}}{{yes}}
Artistic License 1.0{{No}}The original version of the Artistic License is defined as non-free because it is overly vague, not because of the substance of the license. The FSF encourages projects to use the [https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#ArtisticLicense Clarified Artistic License] instead.{{no}}{{yes}}{{yes}}{{no}}
Artistic License 2.0{{yes}}{{yes}}{{yes}}{{yes}}{{yes}}
Beerware License{{partial|see "Informal license" section}}{{cite web|url=https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#informal|title=Various Licenses and Comments about Them|date=2016-01-05|publisher=Free Software Foundation|access-date=2016-01-05}}{{partial|see "Informal license" section}}{{no}}{{no}}{{yes}}{{cite web|url=https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/Beerware|title=Licensing/Beerware|publisher=Fedora Project|access-date=2015-03-10}}
Original BSD license{{yes}}{{no}}{{no}}{{cite web | url = http://www.opensource.org/licenses/bsd-license.php | title = The BSD License:Licensing | publisher = Open Source Initiative | access-date = 1 February 2021 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20091129081849/http://www.opensource.org/licenses/bsd-license.php | archive-date = 29 November 2009 | url-status = dead}}{{yes}}{{yes}}
Revised BSD license{{yes}}{{yes}}{{yes}}{{yes}}{{yes}}
Simplified BSD license{{yes}}{{yes}}{{yes}}{{yes}}{{yes}}
Zero-Clause BSD License{{?}}{{?}}{{yes}}{{cite web|url=http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review_lists.opensource.org/2018-November/003830.html |title=[License-review] Please rename "Free Public License-1.0.0" to 0BSD. |publisher=Open Source Initiative |access-date=2019-02-11}}{{?}}{{?}}
Boost Software License{{yes}}{{yes}}{{yes}}{{yes}}{{yes}}
CeCILL{{yes}}{{yes}}{{yes}}{{yes}}{{yes}}
Common Development and Distribution License{{yes}}{{maybe|GPLv3 (GPLv2 disputed)}}{{cite web |url=https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#CDDL |title=Various Licenses and Comments About Them - Common Development and Distribution License |publisher=Free Software Foundation |access-date=2006-12-31}}{{cite web |author=Michael Larabel|author-link=Michael Larabel |url=https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=Ubuntu-ZFS-Standard-Plans |title=Ubuntu Is Planning To Make The ZFS File-System A "Standard" Offering |publisher=Phoronix|date=6 October 2015}}{{cite web|publisher=Canonical|work=Ubuntu Insights |url=https://insights.ubuntu.com/2016/02/18/zfs-licensing-and-linux/ |title=ZFS Licensing and Linux |author=Dustin Kirkland |date=18 February 2016}}[http://blog.hansenpartnership.com/are-gplv2-and-cddl-incompatible/ Are GPLv2 and CDDL incompatible?] on hansenpartnership.com by James E.J. Bottomley "What the above analysis shows is that even though we presumed combination of GPLv2 and CDDL works to be a technical violation, there's no way actually to prosecute such a violation because we can’t develop a convincing theory of harm resulting. Because this makes it impossible to take the case to court, effectively it must be concluded that the combination of GPLv2 and CDDL, provided you’re following a GPLv2 compliance regime for all the code, is allowable." (23 February 2016){{cite web |url=https://softwarefreedom.org/resources/2016/linux-kernel-cddl.html|title=The Linux Kernel, CDDL and Related Issues|date=26 February 2016|first1=Eben |last1=Moglen | first2=Mishi | last2= Choudhary}}[https://sfconservancy.org/blog/2016/feb/25/zfs-and-linux/ GPL Violations Related to Combining ZFS and Linux] on sfconservancy.org by Bradley M. Kuhn and Karen M. Sandler (February 25, 2016){{yes}}{{yes}}{{yes}}
Common Public License{{yes}}{{no}}{{yes}}{{yes}}{{yes}}
Creative Commons Zero{{yes}}{{cite web|url=https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.en.html#CC0 |title=Various Licenses and Comments about Them - GNU Project - Free Software Foundation}}{{yes}}{{no}}{{cite web|url=http://opensource.org/faq#cc-zero|publisher=opensource.org |title=Frequently Answered Questions |date=21 October 2007 |quote="CC0 was not explicitly rejected, but the License Review Committee was unable to reach consensus that it should be approved"}}{{yes}}{{yes}}{{cite web|url=https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main?rd=Licensing#Good_Licenses |title=Licensing:Main}}
Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0{{yes}}{{partial|GPLv3}}{{cite web|url=https://www.fsf.org/blogs/licensing/creative-commons-by-sa-4-0-declared-one-way-compatible-with-gnu-gpl-version-3|title=Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 declared one-way compatible with GNU GPL version 3 — Free Software Foundation — working together for free software}}{{?}}{{yes}}{{?}}
Cryptix General License{{yes}}{{yes}}{{yes}}{{yes}}{{yes}}
Eclipse Public License{{yes}}{{no}}{{yes}}{{yes}}{{yes}}
Educational Community License{{yes}}{{yes}}{{cite web|url=https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/license-list.html#ECL2.0|title=Educational Community License 2.0|author=Free Software Foundation|work=Licenses|publisher=Free Software Foundation}}{{yes}}{{no}}{{yes}}
Eiffel Forum License 2{{yes}}{{yes}}{{yes}}{{yes}}{{yes}}
European Union Public Licence{{yes}}{{yes}}{{yes}}{{yes}}{{yes}}
GNU Affero General Public License{{yes}}{{yes}}https://www.gnu.org/licenses/ : "We use only licenses that are compatible with the GNU GPL for GNU software."{{yes}}{{yes}}{{yes}}
GNU General Public License v2{{yes}}{{no}}But can be made compatible by upgrading to GPLv3 via the optional "or later" clause added in most GPLv2 license texts.{{yes}}{{yes}}{{yes}}
GNU General Public License v3{{yes}}{{yes}}But not with GPLv2 without "or later" clause.{{cite web| url=https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#v2v3Compatibility| title=Frequently Asked Questions about the GNU Licenses – Is GPLv3 compatible with GPLv2?| publisher=gnu.org| access-date=3 June 2014 |quote=No. Some of the requirements in GPLv3, such as the requirement to provide Installation Information, do not exist in GPLv2. As a result, the licenses are not compatible: if you tried to combine code released under both these licenses, you would violate section 6 of GPLv2. However, if code is released under GPL "version 2 or later," that is compatible with GPLv3 because GPLv3 is one of the options it permits.}}{{yes}}{{yes}}{{yes}}
GNU Lesser General Public License{{yes}}{{yes}}{{yes}}{{yes}}{{yes}}
GNU Free Documentation License{{yes}}{{no}}{{Cite web|url=https://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2003/04/msg00258.html|title = Re: Proposed statement WRT GNU FDL}}{{yes}}{{Cite web|url=https://spdx.org/licenses/|title = SPDX License List | Software Package Data Exchange (SPDX)}}{{no}}{{cite web|url=https://www.debian.org/vote/2006/vote_001|title=General Resolution: Why the GNU Free Documentation License is not suitable for Debian main}}{{no}}
IBM Public License{{yes}}{{no}}{{yes}}{{yes}}{{yes}}
Intel Open Source License{{yes}}{{yes}}{{yes}}{{no}}{{no}}
ISC license{{yes}}{{cite web|url=http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/quick-guide-gplv3.html#new-compatible-licenses|title=A Quick Guide to GPLv3|author=Free Software Foundation|work=Licenses|publisher=Free Software Foundation}}{{yes}}{{yes}}{{yes}}{{yes}}
LaTeX Project Public License{{yes}}{{no}}{{yes}}{{yes}}{{yes}}
Microsoft Public License{{yes}}{{no}}{{yes}}{{no}}{{yes}}
Microsoft Reciprocal License{{yes}}{{no}}{{yes}}{{no}}{{yes}}
MIT license / X11 license{{yes}}{{yes}}{{yes}}{{yes}}{{yes}}
Mozilla Public License 1.1{{yes}}{{no}}{{yes}}{{yes}}{{yes}}
Mozilla Public License 2.0{{yes}}{{yes}}MPL 2.0 is GPL compatible unless marked "Incompatible with Secondary Licenses".{{cite web|url=https://www.mozilla.org/MPL/2.0/FAQ.html|title=MPL 2.0 FAQ|author=Mozilla Foundation|work=Licenses|publisher=Mozilla Foundation}}{{yes}}{{yes}}{{yes}}
NASA Open Source Agreement{{no}}{{no}}{{yes}}{{?}}{{no}}
Netscape Public License{{yes}}{{no}}{{no}}{{no}}{{yes}}
Open Software License{{yes}}{{no}}{{yes}}{{no}}{{yes}}
OpenSSL license{{yes}}{{no}}{{no}}{{yes}}{{yes}}
PHP License{{yes}}{{no}}{{yes}}{{yes}}{{yes}}
Python Software Foundation License 2.0.1; 2.1.1 and newer{{yes}}{{yes}}{{yes}}{{yes}}{{yes}}
Q Public License{{yes}}{{no}}{{yes}}{{no}}{{yes}}
Reciprocal Public License 1.5{{no}}{{no}}{{yes}}{{no}}{{no}}
Sleepycat License{{yes}}{{yes}}{{yes}}{{yes}}{{yes}}
Sun Industry Standards Source License{{yes}}{{no}}{{yes}}{{no}}{{yes}}
Sun Public License{{yes}}{{no}}{{yes}}{{no}}{{yes}}
Sybase Open Watcom Public License{{no}}{{no}}{{yes}}{{no}}{{no}}
Unlicense{{yes}}{{cite web|url=https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.en.html#Unlicense |title=Various Licenses and Comments about Them - GNU Project - Free Software Foundation}}{{yes}}{{yes}}{{cite web|url=http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review_lists.opensource.org/2020-June/004890.html |title=[License-review] Request for legacy approval: The Unlicense}}{{dunno}}{{yes}}
W3C Software Notice and License{{yes}}{{yes}}{{yes}}{{yes}}{{yes}}
Do What The Fuck You Want To Public License (WTFPL){{yes}}Listed as WTFPL.{{yes}}{{no}}{{cite web|url=http://www.opensource.org/minutes20090304|title=OSI Board Meeting Minutes, Wednesday, March 4, 2009|date=4 May 2009 }}{{yes}}{{yes}}
XFree86 1.1 License{{yes}}{{yes}}{{cite web|url=https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/license-list.html#XFree861.1License|title=XFree86 1.1 License|author=Free Software Foundation|work=Licenses|publisher=Free Software Foundation}}{{no}}{{no}}{{no}}
zlib/libpng license{{yes}}{{yes}}{{yes}}{{yes}}{{yes}}
Zope Public License 1.0{{yes}}{{no}}{{no}}{{no}}{{yes}}
Zope Public License 2.0{{yes}}{{yes}}{{yes}}{{no}}{{yes}}

{{Reflist|group="note"}}

See also

Notes

{{Notelist}}

References

{{Reflist|30em}}

{{Open navbox}}

{{Intellectual property activism}}

{{DEFAULTSORT:Comparison Of Free And Open Source Software Licenses}}

Category:Debian

*

Category:Free Software Foundation

Category:Free software lists and comparisons

Licenses

Category:Companies' terms of service